Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis
This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.
Risk tier summary
| Tier | Count | Review routing | Example doctrines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 10 | Human theologian, every occurrence | Deity of Christ, Sonship of Christ, Resurrection of Christ, Incarnation, Prayer and Intercession, Evangelism, Assurance of Salvation, Salvation, Messianic Promise, Lordship of Christ |
| High | 17 | Human theologian | Gospel, Divine Calling, Grace, Faith, Sanctification, Universal Scope of the Gospel, Providence, Universal Human Accountability |
| Medium | 10 | Native speaker review | Apostleship, Humanity of Christ, Sainthood, Spiritual Gifts, Mission to the Nations, Unity of Jews and Gentiles |
| Low | 3 | Automated review only | Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship |
Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do
Eight of the ten Critical-risk doctrines share the pan-Islamic tawhid-collision property found in other Turkic Language Packages in this pipeline. The other two are distinctive to this Language Package: Prayer and Intercession is elevated to Critical because of Uzbekistan’s unusually deep and widespread Sufi shrine-intercession culture (shafoat sought through awliyo at mazor tombs), and Evangelism is elevated to Critical because Uzbekistan’s religion law imposes some of the most restrictive, actively enforced limits on unregistered religious teaching and proselytism in the region — a legal-safety risk layered on top of the translation-accuracy risk that governs most other Critical items.
Review routing rationale
Critical and High risk doctrines (27 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Uzbek is fluent and even doctrinally correct in isolation, without catching that a lesson has failed to distinguish Christ’s mediating work from shafoat, or has under-appreciated the legal risk of evangelism-adjacent content. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is cultural fit rather than direct doctrinal contradiction or legal exposure.