How volunteers settle the wording of doctrinal terms in a language, and how those decisions reach the shipping translation package.
Last updated August 11, 2026
Every language package carries a list of doctrinal terms, words like atonement, propitiation, or covenant, and the renderings actually found across the Bible books loaded for that language. Where the books disagree with each other, someone has to decide which rendering is right.
Library review is where that decision gets made, by people who speak the language, and recorded with the reasoning attached. Once a term settles, it flows into the requirements package that translators and AI agents read during translation.
A term is either open and waiting for answers, or settled and decided. You do not need to answer every open term. Reviews are collaborative, and no term is ever settled on one person’s answer.
Plan on 15 to 30 minutes. Spend it on as many terms as you can consider carefully, rather than rushing all of them.
There are two ways in, and either one is enough.
You were invited. Look for the email Help review … Bible doctrine terms on tri-bible.ai and
open the link inside it. It expires, so use it while it is current.
You speak the language. No invitation needed. Add the language to your profile and any language already under review opens up to you.
If you are not signed in when you open a review link, you will be sent to the front page to sign in or create an account, then returned to the exact page you were heading for. Nothing is lost by clicking the link first.
Go to your profile and complete these, because they determine how much weight your answers carry:
Weighting is explained in full below. In short: teaching experience only counts toward the heavier weight once someone has vouched for you, through an invitation or an administrator grant.
It is in the left sidebar of the app, listed as Library review. You will see the languages you
can review and how many terms are still open in each. If you see Nothing here., your profile has
no language that currently has terms waiting.
Choose a language, then a term. Each term shows why it is contested, followed by Renderings found in the books, the actual wordings that appear across the Bible books loaded for that language.
Search the Library opens the Library entry for that term with the language already filtered, if you want to see how it is used before deciding.
Pick one of the renderings listed, or use one of the two alternatives:
The field labelled Why (optional, but it is the durable record) is the one that outlives the vote. The chosen word ends up in the package either way; your reasoning is what lets the next person understand the decision instead of reopening it.
Then press Submit my answer. You can come back and Update my answer later.
Other people’s answers stay hidden until you have submitted your own. That is deliberate: it keeps the first answer from anchoring everyone who follows.
Once you have answered, Other reviewers appears, and you can Agree or Disagree with
each of them. If you are first, you will see No one else has answered yet., which is normal.
Copy link gives you a direct address for the single term, shaped like
/app/review/german/atonement_kipper. It is safe to send to anyone. They will be asked to sign in,
and land on that exact term.
Nothing settles on one person’s say-so, and riskier doctrine needs more agreement.
| Doctrinal risk | Weight needed | Distinct reviewers needed |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | 4 | 2 |
| High | 3 | 2 |
| Medium | 2 | 2 |
| Low | 2 | 2 |
Vote weight. Most answers count as 1. An answer counts as 4 when all three are true: the reviewer’s profile lists that language, they report 5 or more years teaching the Bible, and someone vouched for them through an invitation or an administrator grant. Self-declaring a language on your own profile grants access to review, but not the heavier weight.
The floor that overrides everything. A term always needs at least 2 distinct reviewers. Without it, a single weight-4 answer would meet the Critical threshold alone and settle a Critical doctrinal term with nobody to agree or disagree.
This is the loop that gets decisions out of review and into the package people download.
Keep to three languages under review at a time. Every committed language store is bundled into the deploy, and there is a hard size ceiling on it.