Doctrine Analysis

This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1–16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.

Risk tier summary

Tier	Count	Review routing	Example doctrines
Critical	7	Human theologian, every occurrence	Salvation, Incarnation, Deity of Christ, Sonship of Christ, Resurrection of Christ, Lordship of Christ, Messianic Promise
High	23	Human theologian	Gospel, Divine Calling, Grace, Faith, Sanctification, Universal Scope of the Gospel, Unity of Jews and Gentiles
Medium	7	Native speaker review	Apostleship, Prayer and Intercession, Spiritual Gifts, Mission to the Nations, Evangelism
Low	3	Automated review only	Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship

Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do

Six of the seven Critical-risk doctrines share one property distinctive to the Assamese context: each has a ready-made, fluent-sounding word drawn not from a vague “Hindu background” but specifically from the Ekasarana Dharma tradition’s own worked-out monotheistic-bhakti theology, in which a supreme God (Krishna as Vishnu’s avatar) periodically takes bodily form and is approached through single-minded devotion. This is a harder translation problem than generic polytheism, because the wrong word doesn’t just sound religious — it sounds like exactly the kind of exclusive, personal devotion Romans is calling for, while smuggling in avatar-descent and karma-merit assumptions.

Review routing rationale

Critical and High risk doctrines (30 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Assamese is fluent and even devotionally sincere-sounding without catching that it imports a contradictory theological framework. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is cultural fit and sensitivity (e.g. colonial/mission-era institutional connotations) rather than doctrinal contradiction.