Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis
This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.
Risk tier summary
| Tier | Count | Review routing | Example doctrines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 10 | Human theologian, every occurrence | Salvation, Kingdom Mission, Incarnation, Deity of Christ, Sonship of Christ, Resurrection of Christ, Lordship of Christ, Adoption |
| High | 18 | Human theologian | Gospel-adjacent doctrines, Grace, Faith, Sainthood, Mission to the Nations, Evangelism, Church as God’s People |
| Medium | 10 | Native speaker review | Divine Calling, Apostleship, Peace with God, Unity of Jews and Gentiles, Christ-Centered Ministry |
| Low | 2 | Automated review only | Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification |
Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do
Kurdish’s ten Critical-risk doctrines fall into three distinct clusters, more variety of sources than any other language in this batch. The first (Incarnation, Deity, Sonship, Resurrection, Lordship of Christ) traces to the shared tawhid objection found across Sunni Islam, but with an added twist for Sonship and Incarnation: Sufi and Yazidi frameworks create an inverted risk of over-assimilation rather than simple rejection. The second (Adoption) traces to the shared Quranic restriction reinforced by Kurdish tribal structures. The third, and the reason Kurdish’s risk profile is genuinely unique in this pipeline, is political-vocabulary overlap: Salvation and Kingdom Mission are Critical because their Kurdish vocabulary is inseparable in everyday usage from the defining language of Kurdish political nationalism.
Review routing rationale
Critical and High risk doctrines (28 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Kurdish is fluent, doctrinally aware, and even devotionally rich (via Sufi poetic resonance) without catching either a subtle mystical-absorption drift or an unintended nationalist-political reading. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is regional variation (across the four states Kurdish spans) or secular-vocabulary echo rather than doctrinal contradiction.