Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Week Planned July 13, 2026 – July 19, 2026

Week ending 7/19

This report previews planned work. Nothing below has shipped yet.

Executive summary

This week's focus is designing volunteer login with edit rights, so trusted volunteers can review, update, and approve Language Package content directly instead of routing every change through the internal team.

What's new

  • Change

    Planning volunteer login with edit rights to review, update, and propose changes to Language Package content.

    Impact

    Distributed reviewers could correct doctrine-risk terms and glossary entries directly, instead of every fix routing through the internal team.

    Next action

    Draft the login and permissions design, scoped to which fields a volunteer editor may change.

  • Change

    Planning a two-approver requirement before any volunteer-submitted edit goes live.

    Impact

    No single volunteer account, if mistaken or compromised, can change doctrine-checked content unilaterally.

    Next action

    Write the approval-routing instructions covering who qualifies as an approver and how a second approver is assigned per language.

  • Change

    Planning an edit history view so every approved change is traceable to its two approvers.

    Impact

    Any future doctrine question can be traced to exactly who approved a change and when.

    Next action

    Confirm whether edit history lives in the existing Language Package files or a separate audit log.

Business impact

Volunteer edit access is the platform's biggest lever for scaling doctrine review capacity without growing the internal team, but it only works if every approved change is provably safe before it reaches Crowdin.

Metrics

No metrics recorded for this period yet.

Risks

Opening edit access before the two-approver workflow is proven risks an unreviewed doctrinal change reaching production; login and permissions security also has to be right from day one given the sensitivity of the content.

Decisions needed

Leadership: decide whether the two-approver requirement applies to every volunteer edit or only Critical- and High-risk doctrine terms, and confirm who is authorized to serve as an approver for each language.

Next Week

  • Circulate the volunteer login and approval workflow design for feedback
  • Begin scoping which Language Package fields are editable by volunteers

Key dates

  • August 1, 2026 — Target: circulate the volunteer login and two-approver workflow design for review