Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis
This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.
Risk tier summary
| Tier | Count | Review routing | Example doctrines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 10 | Human theologian, every occurrence | Deity of Christ, Sonship of Christ, Resurrection of Christ, Incarnation, Inspiration of Scripture, Prayer and Intercession, Assurance of Salvation, Salvation, Messianic Promise, Lordship of Christ |
| High | 17 | Human theologian | Gospel, Divine Calling, Grace, Faith, Sanctification, Evangelism, Universal Scope of the Gospel, Providence, Universal Human Accountability |
| Medium | 10 | Native speaker review | Apostleship, Humanity of Christ, Sainthood, Spiritual Gifts, Mission to the Nations, Unity of Jews and Gentiles |
| Low | 3 | Automated review only | Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship |
Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do
Eight of the ten Critical-risk doctrines share the pan-Islamic tawhid-collision property found in other Islamic-context Language Packages in this pipeline. The other two are distinctive to this Language Package: Inspiration of Scripture is elevated to Critical because the “Allah” word controversy makes Scripture’s own vocabulary a live legal and political matter in Malaysia, not just a doctrinal-confidence question; and Prayer and Intercession is elevated to Critical because syafaat Nabi Muhammad is a mainstream, formally taught article of Sunni eschatology in Malaysian Islamic education, giving it a more official, creedal status than the folk or sectarian intercession practices flagged in some of this pipeline’s other Language Packages.
Review routing rationale
Critical and High risk doctrines (27 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Malay is fluent and even doctrinally correct in isolation, without catching that a lesson has drifted toward an Insider Movement-style softening of “Son of God,” used the Qur’anic Isa/Al-Masih naming instead of the established Alkitab Yesus/Kristus convention, or failed to distinguish Christ’s intercession from syafaat. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is cultural and ethnic-identity fit rather than direct doctrinal contradiction or legal exposure.