Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis: 3 John (Koine Greek → Urdu)

Curriculum: 3 John Core passage: 3 John 1:1–14 Destination language: Urdu (Perso-Arabic/Nastaliq script) Baseline authority: Romans/Galatians Language Package (translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, doctrine_risk_registry.json, 12_ai_translation_requirements.md) — all established renderings below are reused exactly where the term recurs; new terms are marked [NEW].


0. Structural note: full-book coverage

3 John is a single-chapter letter of 14 verses. There is no chapter 2 or beyond. The core passage (1:1–14) therefore IS the entire book, and the verse-by-verse treatment below constitutes complete first-to-last coverage of the curriculum, satisfying the full-book-coverage mandate without any additional chapter sections being required. Per §5 below, this is stated explicitly rather than silently assumed.

Compared to Romans/Galatians, 3 John is a short, personal, occasional letter (a private letter of commendation and complaint, closer in genre to a Hellenistic patronage letter than to a doctrinal treatise). Its theological load is carried less by abstract soteriological vocabulary (δικαιοσύνη, χάρις, νόμος do not occur at all) and more by:

  • relational/ethical vocabulary (ἀγάπη, ἀλήθεια, ἀγαθόν/κακόν),
  • a concrete social-ethics case study (hospitality to itinerant gospel workers vs. Diotrephes’ abuse of local church authority),
  • vocabulary of testimony/reputation (μαρτυρέω, μαρτυρία) applied to named individuals (Gaius, Demetrius, Diotrephes) rather than to Christ’s resurrection or Scripture’s inspiration as in Romans.

This changes the risk profile: 3 John’s Critical/High risks cluster around honor-shame social dynamics, ecclesial authority/pride, and Islamic vocabulary collisions with “elder,” “testimony,” and “good deeds” rather than around Christological negation risks (crucifixion, sonship, incarnation) that dominate Romans/Galatians. Those Romans/Galatians risks are not absent from the wider curriculum but do not arise from 3 John’s own text, which contains no direct Christological titles beyond “the Name” (v. 7) and no crucifixion/resurrection language at all.


1. Core Passage Verse-by-Verse Analysis (3 John 1:1–14)

Verse 1

Greek: Ὁ πρεσβύτερος Γαίῳ τῷ ἀγαπητῷ, ὃν ἐγὼ ἀγαπῶ ἐν ἀληθείᾳ. Gloss: “The elder, to Gaius the beloved, whom I love in truth.”

FieldContent
Original wordπρεσβύτερος
Transliterationpresbyteros
Literal meaning”older one, elder”; comparative of πρέσβυς (“old man”)
Semantic range(1) a chronologically older person; (2) an office-holder in the local congregation (Acts 14:23, 1 Tim 5:17); (3) here, a self-designation used absolutely, without a definite office named, by the author (traditionally identified as the apostle John in his old age) — a claim to relational, pastoral authority rather than a title requiring further qualification
English variants”the elder,” “the presbyter,” “the old man”
Contextual theological meaningEstablishes the author’s authority as a first-generation eyewitness/apostolic figure writing pastorally, not institutionally; sets up the direct authority-contrast with Diotrephes (v. 9-10), who claims local preeminence but is not “the elder”
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Candidate رendering بزرگ (buzurg) is the most natural Urdu word for “elder/venerable old man,” but بزرگ in South Asian Muslim devotional usage names a revered Sufi saint or spiritual master (pir/buzurg), often associated with shrine veneration and intercessory authority — a status-category risk structurally similar to the baseline’s caution against ولی (wali) for “saints.” A literal transliteration-avoidance option (رہنما, “leader,” or بزرگ ایمان دار, “elder believer”) should be considered; this Language Package adopts بزرگ with a mandatory clarifying note at first occurrence: this is a pastoral self-designation of age and apostolic relationship, not a claim to Sufi-style saintly intercessory status. Recommend human theologian review at every occurrence (only v. 1 in this book).
Related termἀγαπητός/ἀγαπάω, ἀλήθεια — see below

Same verse, second term:

FieldContent
Original wordἀγαπητός
Transliterationagapētos
Literal meaning”beloved, dear one”
Semantic rangeTerm of affection within the Christian family; used of Gaius here and again in vv. 2, 5, 11 as a structural marker opening each new section of the letter
English variants”beloved,” “dear friend,” “dear Gaius”
Contextual theological meaningMarks Gaius as a member of the spiritual family bound by ἀγάπη, not merely a social acquaintance; the fourfold repetition (vv. 1, 2, 5, 11) structures the whole letter around relational affection
Destination-language rendering riskLOW-MEDIUM [NEW]. Render عزیز (azīz) or پیارے (pyāre). عزیز is warm, standard, and carries no significant competing religious association. Keep consistent across all four occurrences (vv. 1, 2, 5, 11) per the pipeline’s cross-document consistency rule.

Same verse, third term:

FieldContent
Original wordἀλήθεια (ἐν ἀληθείᾳ)
Transliterationalētheia
Literal meaning”truth, that which is not concealed/real”
Semantic range(1) factual accuracy; (2) the content of the Christian gospel/apostolic teaching as a body of revealed truth (cf. baseline’s “the_truth_of_the_gospel,” خوش خبری کی سچائی); (3) a quasi-technical Johannine marker of genuine, gospel-shaped Christian character and fellowship (used seven times in this short letter: vv. 1, 3 [×2], 4, 8, 12 [×2])
English variants”truth,” “the truth,” “in truth,” “in truth and love”
Contextual theological meaning”Whom I love in truth” does not mean merely “sincerely” but “as a fellow-participant in the gospel truth we share” — ἀλήθεια in 3 John functions almost as a name for authentic Christian identity and fellowship, the standard by which Gaius’s hospitality (v. 3-4) and Diotrephes’ conduct (implicitly, by contrast) are measured
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Render سچائی (sachā’ī). Risk: (a) if flattened to mean only “sincerity” or “honesty” in a generic ethical sense, the term loses its Johannine technical weight as the shared gospel-reality that binds the fellowship together, weakening the doctrine of “Truth and Christian Fellowship” that this curriculum names explicitly; (b) سچائی must be kept distinct from the baseline’s compound خوش خبری کی سچائی (“the truth of the gospel,” Critical risk in Galatians) — 3 John’s bare ἀλήθεια should be understood as continuous with, but not identical to, that compound; a translator’s note anchoring ἀλήθεια to “the gospel reality we share in Christ” is recommended at v. 1 and v. 3.

Verse 2

Greek: Ἀγαπητέ, περὶ πάντων εὔχομαί σε εὐοδοῦσθαι καὶ ὑγιαίνειν, καθὼς εὐοδοῦταί σου ἡ ψυχή. Gloss: “Beloved, concerning all things I pray/wish that you may prosper and be in health, just as your soul prospers.”

FieldContent
Original wordεὔχομαι
Transliterationeuchomai
Literal meaning”to wish, to pray”
Semantic rangeA general verb of wishing/praying, weaker than the technical προσεύχομαι; here a personal epistolary wish, not a liturgical prayer act
English variants”I pray,” “I wish,” “my prayer is”
Contextual theological meaningAn affectionate personal greeting-wish, part of standard Hellenistic letter convention, but here Christianized by its parallel to the health of Gaius’s ψυχή
Destination-language rendering riskLOW. Render دعا کرتا ہوں / خواہش کرتا ہوں. No significant competing association; standard epistolary greeting language.

FieldContent
Original wordεὐοδοῦσθαι
Transliterationeuodousthai
Literal meaning”to have a good journey/road” (from εὖ + ὁδός), extended to “to prosper, to go well”
Semantic rangeLiteral: journeying well; figurative: general life-flourishing, financial/material well-being, or (as here) spiritual well-being
English variants”prosper,” “go well,” “be successful”
Contextual theological meaningThe wish for Gaius’s outward prosperity is explicitly measured against (“just as,” καθώς) the prior, more important prospering of his ψυχή — outward well-being is desired in proportion to, not instead of, spiritual health
Destination-language rendering riskLOW-MEDIUM [NEW]. Render کامیاب ہونا / خوشحال ہونا. Caution: must not be taught or heard as a “prosperity gospel” promise of guaranteed material blessing; the verse’s own grammar (καθώς) subordinates outward prosperity to the soul’s prospering, and this subordination must survive translation, e.g. by keeping the comparative clause structure intact rather than rendering the two prosperities as parallel, equal wishes.

FieldContent
Original wordψυχή
Transliterationpsychē
Literal meaning”soul, life, inner self”
Semantic range(1) physical life/breath; (2) the inner, non-physical seat of a person’s will, emotion, and spiritual condition (as here); distinct from πνεῦμα, which in the NT more often names the God-given/God-related spirit (and, capitalized, the Holy Spirit)
English variants”soul,” “inner being,” “spiritual life”
Contextual theological meaningGaius’s ψυχή “prospering” refers to his spiritual health/character, evidenced concretely later in the letter by his hospitality and walking in truth (vv. 3-6)
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render جان (jān), not روح (rūh). This Language Package’s baseline reserves روح القدس (rūh al-qudus) for the Holy Spirit specifically, a Critical-risk term requiring careful distinction from the Qur’an’s own use of the same phrase (see baseline “holy_spirit” entry); using روح for ordinary human ψυχή here risks blurring that carefully maintained distinction. جان is the standard, safe Urdu word for a person’s soul/inner life and carries no Trinitarian-collision risk.

Verse 3

Greek: ἐχάρην γὰρ λίαν ἐρχομένων ἀδελφῶν καὶ μαρτυρούντων σου τῇ ἀληθεί�ᾳ, καθὼς σὺ ἐν ἀληθείᾳ περιπατεῖς. Gloss: “For I rejoiced greatly when brothers came and testified to your truth, just as you walk in truth.”

FieldContent
Original wordἐχάρην (χαίρω)
Transliterationecharēn (chairō)
Literal meaning”I rejoiced”
Semantic rangeStandard NT joy-vocabulary; here personal, relational joy at a good report about a fellow believer
English variants”I rejoiced greatly,” “I was very glad”
Contextual theological meaningThe Elder’s joy is triggered by verified good news of Gaius’s character, structurally parallel to v. 4’s “no greater joy” over spiritual children walking in truth
Destination-language rendering riskLOW. Render نہایت خوش ہوا / بہت خوشی ہوئی. Standard vocabulary.

FieldContent
Original wordἀδελφῶν (ἀδελφός)
Transliterationadelphōn (adelphos)
Literal meaning”brothers”
Semantic range(1) biological siblings; (2) fellow members of the Christian community, male and female (inclusive plural), the dominant NT epistolary sense; (3) in this letter specifically, itinerant gospel workers/missionaries (see v. 5, v. 10)
English variants”brothers,” “brethren,” “fellow believers”
Contextual theological meaningThese are not simply local congregation members but traveling ministers whose report of Gaius’s hospitality and character forms the letter’s occasion
Destination-language rendering riskLOW-MEDIUM [NEW]. Render بھائی (bhā’ī). Standard, safe. Note for translators: in modern Urdu, بھائی can carry a purely social/familial register; ensure context (traveling gospel workers, church community) is clear so the term is read as the NT’s fictive-kinship “brothers in Christ,” not merely biological or generic social brothers.

FieldContent
Original wordμαρτυρούντων (μαρτυρέω)
Transliterationmartyrountōn (martyreō)
Literal meaning”testifying, bearing witness”
Semantic rangeTo give reliable, firsthand testimony about a fact or a person’s character; legal/forensic origin (witness in a dispute) extended to general reliable report
English variants”testified,” “bore witness,” “gave a good report”
Contextual theological meaningThe traveling brothers gave eyewitness testimony specifically to Gaius’s ἀλήθεια — his gospel-shaped character was independently verified and publicly reportable, a theme repeated for Demetrius in v. 12
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Render گواہی دینا (gawāhī denā). Collision risk: Urdu شہادت (shahāda) is heavily loaded — it is (a) the Islamic legal term for court testimony, and (b) the technical name for the Islamic creedal confession (“There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His messenger”) and (c) also used for “martyrdom.” Using شہادت for this everyday Johannine “testifying to character” would import all three of those associations unhelpfully. گواہی is the correct, more neutral choice (ordinary testimony/eyewitness report) and must be used consistently for μαρτυρέω/μαρτυρία throughout this letter (vv. 3, 6, 12 [×2]), never شہادت.

FieldContent
Original wordπεριπατεῖς (περιπατέω)
Transliterationperipateis (peripateō)
Literal meaning”you walk about”
Semantic rangeLiteral: to walk physically; figurative (dominant Pauline/Johannine sense): to live/conduct one’s life in a given manner
English variants”walk in truth,” “live according to truth,” “conduct yourself in truth”
Contextual theological meaning”Walking in truth” names a whole manner of life consistent with the gospel, not a single act; it is the standard against which Gaius (positively, v. 3-4) and, implicitly, Diotrephes (negatively, v. 9-11) are measured
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. The literal verb چلنا (chalnā, “to walk”) does not carry the figurative “conduct of life” sense as naturally in Urdu as in Greek/Hebrew-influenced English; render idiomatically as سچائی پر زندگی گزارنا (“to live one’s life according to truth/in the truth”) rather than a literal “سچائی میں چلنا,” which risks sounding like an unnatural calque. Preserve theological meaning (a settled manner of life) over literal idiom, per this Language Package’s idiom-handling rule.

Verse 4

Greek: μειζοτέραν τούτων οὐκ ἔχω χαράν, ἵνα ἀκούω τὰ ἐμὰ τέκνα ἐν τῇ ἀληθείᾳ περιπατοῦντα. Gloss: “I have no greater joy than this, that I hear my children are walking in truth.”

FieldContent
Original wordτέκνα
Transliterationtekna
Literal meaning”children”
Semantic range(1) biological offspring; (2) spiritual children — those brought to faith or discipled by the speaker, a common Johannine/Pauline metaphor (cf. Gal 4:19, 1 Cor 4:15)
English variants”children,” “my children,” “my spiritual children”
Contextual theological meaningThe Elder speaks of Gaius (and others in his sphere of ministry) as spiritual offspring whose faithful conduct is his greatest joy — a pastoral, not biological, relationship
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render بچے (bachche) or, more warmly, میرے فرزند (mere farzand, “my [spiritual] children/sons,” a more literary/formal register). Caution: must be clearly marked as a spiritual-relational metaphor (discipleship, not physical parentage) to avoid confusion with the baseline’s separate, carefully-scoped “adoption” doctrine (لے پالک بنانا), which concerns believers’ adoption into God’s family specifically — a distinct, Critical-adjacent doctrine that should not be conflated with this simple pastoral-affection metaphor.

Verse 5

Greek: Ἀγαπητέ, πιστὸν ποιεῖς ὃ ἐὰν ἐργάσῃ εἰς τοὺς ἀδελφοὺς καὶ τοῦτο ξένους, Gloss: “Beloved, you do a faithful thing whatever you accomplish for the brothers, and these strangers.”

FieldContent
Original wordπιστὸν ποιεῖς
Transliterationpiston poieis
Literal meaning”you do a faithful/trustworthy thing”
Semantic rangeπιστός: “faithful, trustworthy, reliable” (adjectival form of the πίστις/πιστεύω root that elsewhere carries “faith/believe”); here used of an action’s character (a loyal, dependable deed), not of saving faith itself
English variants”you do a faithful thing,” “you act faithfully,” “you do a loyal deed”
Contextual theological meaningCommends Gaius’s hospitality as an act of covenant loyalty/faithfulness to the gospel cause, not merely a kindness — his practical support of traveling ministers IS a faithful, gospel-serving deed
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. πιστός shares its root with πίστις (ایمان, “faith,” a Critical-risk baseline term). Render as وفاداری سے یہ کام کرتے ہیں (“you do this work faithfully/loyally”) or ایک وفادار کام کرتے ہیں (“you do a loyal/faithful deed”), using وفاداری (wafādārī, “faithfulness/loyalty” — already an approved baseline term for the fruit-of-the-Spirit sense in Galatians 5:22, deliberately distinct from ایمان) rather than any derivative of ایمان itself. This avoids implying that Gaius’s hospitality is itself the ground of his saving faith (a “good works secure salvation” reading that would collide with the baseline’s justification-by-faith doctrine) while still commending the act’s genuine, gospel-serving loyalty.

FieldContent
Original wordξένους (ξένος)
Transliterationxenous (xenos)
Literal meaning”strangers, foreigners, guests”
Semantic range(1) a stranger/foreigner, someone not of one’s own household or city; (2) by extension, a guest received into hospitality; root of φιλοξενία, “love of strangers/hospitality”
English variants”strangers,” “guests,” “travelers”
Contextual theological meaningNames the itinerant gospel workers (v. 7) as literal strangers to Gaius’s household, whom he nonetheless received and supported — this is the letter’s central positive doctrine, Hospitality to Traveling Ministers
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Doctrine-defining term. Render مہمان (mehmān, “guest”) in context, or پردیسی مسافر (pardesī musāfir, “traveling stranger/foreigner”) when the “unknown to the household” sense needs emphasis. South Asian culture (both Muslim and Hindu-background) has a strong, positive existing value of مہمان نوازی (mehmān-nawāzī, hospitality to guests) — this is a genuine point of cultural bridge, not collision, and should be leveraged pastorally: 3 John’s teaching does not introduce an alien concept but intensifies and gives gospel-specific direction to an already-honored virtue (supporting gospel workers “for the sake of the Name,” v. 7, specifically, not hospitality in general). Ensure the gospel-specific motive is not lost in translation by collapsing into generic mehmān-nawāzī custom.

Verse 6

Greek: οἳ ἐμαρτύρησάν σου τῇ ἀγάπῃ ἐνώπιον ἐκκλησίας· οὕς καλῶς ποιήσεις προπέμψας ἀξίως τοῦ θεοῦ· Gloss: “who testified to your love before the church; whom you will do well to send on their way worthy of God.”

FieldContent
Original wordἀγάπῃ (ἀγάπη)
Transliterationagapē
Literal meaning”love”
Semantic rangeSelf-giving, other-directed love/goodwill, distinct from ἔρος (romantic/erotic love) and φιλία (friendship-affection, though 3 John itself uses φίλος in v. 14); the characteristic NT term for God’s love and the love God’s people are to have for one another
English variants”love,” “your love”
Contextual theological meaningGaius’s ἀγάπη was made visible and reportable precisely through his concrete hospitality — love here is not sentiment but demonstrated, verifiable action, “testified to before the church”
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render محبت (muhabbat). محبت is the standard, safe Urdu word for love and is shared, comfortable vocabulary across religious traditions in South Asia. Minor caution: مhabbat/ishq vocabulary carries strong resonance in Sufi devotional poetry as mystical love of God (often bordering on the language of union/absorption); ensure 3 John’s ἀγάπη is taught as ethical, other-directed, action-verified love among believers (and God’s love for people), not assimilated to that Sufi mystical-union register. Low-to-medium risk only; genuinely shared ground.

FieldContent
Original wordἐκκλησίας (ἐκκλησία)
Transliterationekklēsias
Semantic rangePer baseline: the local gathered community of believers
English variants”church,” “the congregation,” “the assembly”
Contextual theological meaningThe traveling brothers’ testimony to Gaius’s love was given publicly, before Gaius’s own local congregation — establishing that hospitality is a matter of public, congregational reputation, not merely private virtue; this also sets up the direct structural parallel/contrast with Diotrephes’ abuse of ἐκκλησία authority in vv. 9-10
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM. Reuse baseline term كلیسیا (kalīsiyā) exactly, per established Romans/Galatians convention. Never مسجد or امت (see baseline rationale).

FieldContent
Original wordπροπέμψας (προπέμπω)
Transliterationpropempsas (propempō)
Literal meaning”having sent forward”
Semantic rangeTo escort or send someone on their way, often including provisioning them for the journey (food, funds, a traveling companion) — a technical term for missionary support-logistics in the NT (cf. Acts 15:3, Rom 15:24, 1 Cor 16:6, 11)
English variants”send them on their way,” “help them on their journey,” “provide for their journey”
Contextual theological meaningNames the concrete, practical action Gaius is urged to take: not merely welcoming the traveling ministers while present, but equipping and provisioning them to continue their gospel work onward — the letter’s specific, applied form of the hospitality doctrine
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render سفر کے لیے مدد دینا / روانہ کرنا (“to help/provide for the journey” / “to send off”). No single Urdu word captures the full sense (escort + provision); a short phrase is preferable to a single verb. Low religious-collision risk; primarily a translation-completeness risk (ensuring the provisioning sense is not lost by rendering only “send away,” which could sound dismissive rather than supportive).

FieldContent
Original wordἀξίως τοῦ θεοῦ
Transliterationaxiōs tou theou
Literal meaning”worthily of God”
Semantic rangeAn adverbial standard-of-conduct phrase: acting in a manner that befits, or is fitting in light of, God’s own character/God’s cause
English variants”in a manner worthy of God,” “as befits God’s service,” “as God deserves”
Contextual theological meaningElevates the practical act of provisioning traveling ministers to a matter of honoring God himself — hospitality to gospel workers is done not merely as a social kindness but as service rendered to God’s own cause and character
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render خدا کے لائق (k͟hudā ke lā’iq, “worthy of God”) or خدا کی خوشنودی کے مطابق (“in keeping with what pleases God”). Use خدا consistently (never اللہ) per baseline convention. No major doctrinal collision; ensure the phrase is not weakened to a vague “as is proper,” losing its explicit God-directedness.

Verse 7

Greek: ὑπὲρ γὰρ τοῦ ὀνόματος ἐξῆλθον μηδὲν λαμβάνοντες ἀπὸ τῶν ἐθνικῶν. Gloss: “For they went out for the sake of the Name, receiving nothing from the Gentiles/pagans.”

FieldContent
Original wordτοῦ ὀνόματος
Transliterationtou onomatos
Literal meaning”of the Name”
Semantic rangeὄνομα, “name,” used absolutely with the definite article as a reverent shorthand for the name of Jesus Christ, a common early-Christian usage (cf. Acts 5:41 “suffer shame for the Name”); a title-substitute rather than a generic reference to any name
English variants”for the sake of the Name,” “for the Name’s sake,” “on behalf of the name [of Christ]“
Contextual theological meaningIdentifies the traveling ministers’ motive and mission as specifically Christ-centered gospel proclamation, not general religious charity or humanitarian travel — the missionaries went out under, and for, the authority and cause of Jesus’s name specifically
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Render اُس نام کی خاطر (us nām kī k͟hātir, “for the sake of that Name”) with a mandatory clarifying gloss at first occurrence identifying “the Name” as Christ’s name (یسوع مسیح کا نام), since a bare “the Name” in Urdu risks being read generically (e.g., as a reference to Allah, whose “beautiful names,” al-asmā’ al-husnā, are a major and familiar Islamic devotional category — 99 names of God). Without the clarifying gloss, this verse’s Christ-specific missionary motive could be misread as a statement about generic religious devotion “for God’s name” rather than the specifically Christ-commissioned gospel mission this doctrine concerns.

FieldContent
Original wordτῶν ἐθνικῶν (ἐθνικός)
Transliterationtōn ethnikōn (ethnikos)
Literal meaning”the ethnic ones, the nations-people”
Semantic rangeAdjectival form related to ἔθνος (nation); in NT usage frequently means “Gentile” in the Jew/Gentile sense (as in the baseline’s ἔθνη entry), but here, in a letter with no Jew/Gentile controversy in view, more precisely means “outsiders/pagans, non-believers in general” from whom the missionaries refused to accept support, to avoid any appearance of preaching for profit
English variants”the Gentiles,” “the pagans,” “outsiders,” “unbelievers”
Contextual theological meaningThe missionaries’ refusal to take support from ἐθνικῶν establishes their financial integrity and pure motive, making the church’s (Gaius’s) support all the more necessary and commendable — this is the practical, financial-integrity dimension of the hospitality doctrine
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM. Reuse baseline term غیر قوموں (g͟hair qaumõ) for consistency, but with a contextual usage note: unlike Romans’ use of this term for the Jew/Gentile ethnic-theological distinction (a Critical/High-risk doctrinal category throughout Romans), 3 John’s use is the more general “non-believing outsiders” sense. Never render as کافر (see baseline forbidden-substitution rule); غیر قوموں remains correct and neutral here as well.

Verse 8

Greek: ἡμεῖς οὖν ὀφείλομεν ὑπολαμβάνειν τοὺς τοιούτους, ἵνα συνεργοὶ γινώμεθα τῇ ἀληθεί�ᾳ. Gloss: “We therefore ought to support such people, so that we may become fellow workers with the truth.”

FieldContent
Original wordὀφείλομεν (ὀφείλω)
Transliterationopheilomen (opheilō)
Literal meaning”we owe, we are obligated”
Semantic rangeTo be under obligation, whether financial debt or moral duty; here a strong moral “ought,” not a mere suggestion
English variants”we ought,” “we are obligated,” “it is our duty”
Contextual theological meaningElevates hospitality to traveling gospel workers from an optional kindness to a binding communal obligation on all believers, given the missionaries’ Name-centered, financially-integrous motive (v. 7)
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render ہم پر لازم ہے (ham par lāzim hai, “it is binding/obligatory upon us”) or ہمارا فرض ہے (hamārā farz hai, “it is our duty”). Caution: فرض (farz) is a specific, weighty Islamic legal category (an obligatory duty, as distinct from sunnah/nafl, optional acts) — using it here is not wrong (the sense of binding obligation genuinely matches), but reviewers should be aware it may activate that specific Islamic legal-duty frame in a reader’s mind; لازم ہے is a slightly safer, more general alternative if a lighter touch is preferred. Either is acceptable; flag for native speaker review to select register.

FieldContent
Original wordὑπολαμβάνειν (ὑπολαμβάνω)
Transliterationhypolambanein (hypolambanō)
Literal meaning”to take up, to receive, to support”
Semantic rangeLiterally “to take from under” (as in supporting a weight); extended to receiving/welcoming a person, and specifically here to materially supporting them
English variants”support,” “receive,” “take in,” “welcome and provide for”
Contextual theological meaningNames the concrete duty owed to traveling gospel workers: active material support, not merely passive tolerance or a warm welcome without practical follow-through
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render سہارا دینا / مدد کرنا (sahārā denā / madad karnā, “to support/help”). Ensure the material, practical-support sense is not lost by rendering only with a word implying emotional welcome alone (e.g. خوش آمدید کہنا, “to welcome,” used for ἐπιδέχομαι in v. 9-10, is a distinct, related-but-different term and should not be used interchangeably here).

FieldContent
Original wordσυνεργοὶ (συνεργός)
Transliterationsynergoi (synergos)
Literal meaning”fellow-workers, co-workers”
Semantic rangeOne who works alongside another toward a shared goal; a common Pauline term for ministry partnership (Rom 16:3, 9, 21; Phil 4:3)
English variants”fellow workers,” “co-workers,” “partners”
Contextual theological meaningSupporting traveling ministers makes the supporter an active participant in the gospel mission itself, not merely a passive enabler standing outside it — hospitality is itself a form of gospel co-labor, “fellow workers with/for the truth”
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render ساتھی کارکن (sāthī kārkun) or ہم خدمت (ham-k͟hidmat, “fellow servant/co-laborer,” echoing the baseline’s بشارت کی خدمت, “service of the good news”). No major collision risk; keep consistent with بشارت کی خدمت vocabulary already established for gospel mission/service in the baseline, to reinforce that hospitality here is a form of participation in that same mission.

Verse 9

Greek: Ἔγραψά τι τῇ ἐκκλησίᾳ· ἀλλ᾿ ὁ φιλοπρωτεύων αὐτῶν Διοτρέφης οὐκ ἐπιδέχεται ἡμᾶς. Gloss: “I wrote something to the church; but Diotrephes, who loves to be first among them, does not receive us.”

FieldContent
Original wordφιλοπρωτεύων (φιλοπρωτεύω)
Transliterationphiloprōteuōn (philoprōteuō)
Literal meaning”loving to be first” (φιλέω, “to love” + πρῶτος, “first”)
Semantic rangeA rare compound (this is its only NT occurrence), naming a settled character trait/ambition: love of preeminence, status-seeking, self-promotion to leadership
English variants”who loves to be first,” “who likes to put himself first,” “who loves preeminence,” “the ambitious one”
Contextual theological meaningThe doctrinal core of “Church Leadership and Pride.” This single word diagnoses Diotrephes’ entire subsequent misconduct (refusing hospitality, slandering the Elder, expelling others, v. 10) as flowing from one root sin: love of status/preeminence rather than love of truth or the church’s good
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Doctrine-defining term; mandatory native-speaker/theologian review. Render سرداری پسند (sardārī-pasand, “one who loves to be chief/leader”) or اول بننے کی خواہش رکھنے والا (awwal bannē kī k͟hwāhish rakhnē wālā, “one who desires to be first”). Caution: this term names a spiritual vice (pride, self-promotion in the church), and translators must avoid any wording that sounds like ordinary respectful leadership-language (رہنما, “leader,” or سردار, “chief/elder,” used neutrally elsewhere) — the negative, censuring force of φιλοπρωτεύων must be unambiguous in the Urdu, since honor-shame dynamics in South Asian culture make leadership-critique material socially sensitive and easy to soften unintentionally into mere description. This is a teaching passage about a named, real leadership failure and must not be blunted.

FieldContent
Original wordἐπιδέχεται (ἐπιδέχομαι)
Transliterationepidechetai (epidechomai)
Literal meaning”receives, welcomes, accepts”
Semantic rangeTo receive someone hospitably, or to accept/acknowledge someone’s authority/message; used here (and negatively again in v. 10) of Diotrephes’ refusal to receive the Elder’s representatives/authority
English variants”does not receive us,” “does not accept us,” “will not welcome us”
Contextual theological meaningDiotrephes’ refusal is not merely inhospitable but a direct rejection of the Elder’s apostolic authority and the traveling ministers he sends — the same verb links back to the positive hospitality vocabulary of vv. 5-8, making Diotrephes’ conduct the letter’s explicit negative counter-example
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render قبول نہیں کرتا / خوش آمدید نہیں کہتا (qabūl nahī̃ kartā / k͟hush āmdīd nahī̃ kahtā). Keep consistent with ὑπολαμβάνω/vv. 8, 10 vocabulary cluster so the positive/negative contrast (Gaius receives and supports vs. Diotrephes refuses) remains visible in translation.

Verse 10

Greek: διὰ τοῦτο, ἐὰν ἔλθω, ὑπομνήσω τὰ ἔργα αὐτοῦ ἃ ποιεῖ, λόγοις πονηροῖς καταλαλῶν ἡμᾶς, καὶ μὴ ἀρκούμενος ἐπὶ τούτοις οὔτε αὐτὸς ἐπιδέχεται τοὺς ἀδελφοὺς καὶ τοὺς βουλομένους κωλύει καὶ ἐκ τῆς ἐκκλησίας ἐκβάλλει. Gloss: “Therefore, if I come, I will call attention to his deeds, which he does — slandering us with evil words, and not content with this, he neither himself receives the brothers, and hinders those who wish to, and casts them out of the church.”

FieldContent
Original wordκαταλαλῶν (καταλαλέω)
Transliterationkatalalōn (katalaleō)
Literal meaning”speaking against, running down”
Semantic rangeMalicious speech against another, defamation/slander; a NT vice-list term (cf. 1 Pet 2:1, 2 Cor 12:20)
English variants”slandering,” “speaking evil against,” “running us down”
Contextual theological meaningNames Diotrephes’ specific sin against the Elder as slander with λόγοις πονηροῖς (“evil words”) — a verbal, reputation-damaging attack, part of the pattern of abuse flowing from his love of preeminence
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render بدگوئی کرنا (bad-go’ī karnā, “to speak evil/slander”) or غیبت کرنا (g͟hībat karnā, “to backbite”). Note: غیبت is itself a specific, named, gravely condemned sin category in Islamic ethics (backbiting, speaking ill of someone in their absence) — this is a genuine point of positive bridge (the underlying moral judgment that this speech is wrong is already shared cultural ground) rather than a collision risk; either term is safe, with غیبت offering a slightly stronger rhetorical/moral resonance for readers familiar with that ethical category.

FieldContent
Original wordκωλύει (κωλύω)
Transliterationkōlyei (kōlyō)
Literal meaning”hinders, prevents, forbids”
Semantic rangeTo actively stop or forbid an action others wish to take
English variants”hinders,” “forbids,” “prevents,” “stops”
Contextual theological meaningDiotrephes not only personally refuses hospitality but actively obstructs other willing church members from extending it — an escalation from personal refusal to institutional coercion/control
Destination-language rendering riskLOW-MEDIUM [NEW]. Render روکتا ہے (roktā hai, “hinders/stops”) or منع کرتا ہے (mana’ kartā hai, “forbids”). No major collision risk; straightforward vocabulary.

FieldContent
Original wordἐκβάλλει (ἐκβάλλω)
Transliterationekballei (ekballō)
Literal meaning”casts out, throws out, expels”
Semantic rangeForceful removal/expulsion; used elsewhere of exorcism (casting out demons) and of expulsion from a place or community
English variants”expels,” “casts out,” “throws out,” “excludes”
Contextual theological meaningThe climax of Diotrephes’ abuse of power: unilateral expulsion of faithful believers from the local congregation for the “offense” of showing hospitality to the Elder’s representatives — an abuse of church discipline for personal, status-protecting ends rather than genuine doctrinal or moral correction
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM-HIGH [NEW]. Render خارج کر دیتا ہے (k͟hārij kar detā hai, “expels/excommunicates”) or کلیسیا سے نکال دیتا ہے (kalīsiyā se nikāl detā hai, “casts out of the church”). Caution: خارج کر دینا/excommunication-adjacent vocabulary sits near (though is not identical to) the Islamic concept of takfīr (declaring someone outside the faith) — a serious, contested category in Islamic jurisprudence. The two concepts are not equivalent (Diotrephes’ expulsion is a personal-power abuse targeting hospitable believers, not a doctrinal-purity ruling), and this Language Package’s rendering must make clear through context that Diotrephes’ action is condemned by the Elder precisely as an ABUSE of legitimate church authority, not modeled as a legitimate exercise of it — this is the passage’s own verdict, and translators must ensure the Urdu does not accidentally read as validating Diotrephes’ expulsion as proper discipline. Native speaker plus theologian review recommended.

Verse 11

Greek: Ἀγαπητέ, μὴ μιμοῦ τὸ κακὸν ἀλλὰ τὸ ἀγαθόν. ὁ ἀγαθοποιῶν ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ ἐστιν· ὁ κακοποιῶν οὐχ ἑώρακεν τὸν θεόν. Gloss: “Beloved, do not imitate the evil but the good. The one who does good is of God; the one who does evil has not seen God.”

FieldContent
Original wordμιμοῦ (μιμέομαι)
Transliterationmimou (mimeomai)
Literal meaning”imitate” (root of English “mimic, mime”)
Semantic rangeTo model one’s own conduct on an observed example, positive or negative; a significant NT ethical-formation category (cf. 1 Cor 11:1, 1 Thess 1:6)
English variants”imitate,” “follow the example of,” “copy”
Contextual theological meaningThe doctrinal core of “Imitating Good rather than Evil.” Directly applies the Diotrephes/Demetrius contrast just narrated: readers are to consciously choose which example (Demetrius’s good, or Diotrephes’ evil) to pattern their own lives on — moral formation by modeling, not merely by abstract instruction
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM [NEW]. Render پیروی نہ کرو (pairawī nā karo, “do not follow/imitate”) or نقل نہ کرو (naql nā karo, “do not copy”). Low collision risk; straightforward ethical-formation vocabulary shared broadly across religious traditions (the concept of following a good exemplar, e.g., a prophet’s sunnah/example, is itself familiar ground in Islamic ethics — a genuine positive bridge for teaching this doctrine).

FieldContent
Original wordτὸ κακὸν / τὸ ἀγαθόν
Transliterationto kakon / to agathon
Literal meaning”the evil / the good”
Semantic rangeκακός: morally bad, harmful; ἀγαθός: morally good, beneficial — general ethical-quality terms, not the forensic/soteriological vocabulary of δικαιοσύνη (righteousness)
English variants”evil…good,” “bad…good,” “wrong…right”
Contextual theological meaningNames the two exemplars just given (Diotrephes = κακόν, Demetrius = ἀγαθόν) as instances of a general moral binary that every believer must choose between; this is character-formation language, not a restatement of the justification doctrine
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Requires careful doctrinal boundary-setting. Render برائی (burā’ī, “evil”) and نیکی (nekī, “good/goodness”) or بھلائی (bhalā’ī, “goodness”). Critical distinction to maintain: the baseline translation memory explicitly rejects نیکی as a rendering for “righteousness” (راستبازی) precisely because نیکی names achieved personal piety/good deeds, which the baseline’s justification doctrine must keep separate from forensic, faith-received righteous standing. In 3 John, however, ἀγαθόν/κακόν is NOT the soteriological “righteousness” concept at all — it is ordinary ethical goodness/badness in a general exhortation, and نیکی is the correct, natural word for it here. Translators and reviewers must therefore hold two things together without confusing them: (a) نیکی is the right word for “good” in 3 John 1:11, and (b) نیکی must never be used to translate “righteousness”/“justification” elsewhere in the curriculum. A translator’s note distinguishing general ethical “goodness” (3 John’s ἀγαθόν) from forensic “righteousness” (Romans’ δικαιοσύνη) is recommended precisely because both curricula will circulate together and use related-but-distinct Urdu vocabulary.

FieldContent
Original wordὁ ἀγαθοποιῶν … ὁ κακοποιῶν
Transliterationho agathopoiōn … ho kakopoiōn
Literal meaning”the one doing good … the one doing evil”
Semantic rangeAgent-nouns built on the same ἀγαθός/κακός roots; naming a settled pattern of character/action, not a single deed
English variants”the one who does good…the one who does evil,” “whoever does good…whoever does evil”
Contextual theological meaning”Is of God” / “has not seen God” makes the ethical choice a matter of spiritual origin and relationship with God himself, not merely social approval — doing good identifies one as God’s own; doing evil reveals one has not truly encountered/known God, regardless of religious profession
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Render نیکی کرنے والا خدا کی طرف سے ہے؛ برائی کرنے والے نے خدا کو نہیں دیکھا۔ Caution: “is of God” (ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ) must not be read as a claim about divine begetting/sonship (which would wrongly collide with the baseline’s careful Sonship-of-Christ handling) — this is a general Johannine idiom for spiritual origin/belonging (cf. similar phrasing in 1 John 3:9-10, 4:6-7), applied here to any believer who does good, not a unique Christological claim. A brief clarifying note distinguishing this general “belonging to God” idiom from the unique, exclusive Sonship of Christ is recommended to prevent doctrinal confusion between the two curricula’s overlapping vocabulary (بیٹا/خدا کی طرف سے ہونا).

Verse 12

Greek: Δημητρίῳ μεμαρτύρηται ὑπὸ πάντων καὶ ὑπὸ αὐτῆς τῆς ἀληθείας· καὶ ἡμεῖς δὲ μαρτυροῦμεν, καὶ οἶδας ὅτι ἡ μαρτυρία ἡμῶν ἀληθής ἐστιν. Gloss: “Demetrius has been testified to by all, and by the truth itself; and we also testify, and you know that our testimony is true.”

FieldContent
Original wordμεμαρτύρηται (μαρτυρέω)
Transliterationmemartyrētai (martyreō)
Literal meaning”has been testified of, has received testimony” (perfect passive)
Semantic rangeSame root as v. 3, 6 above; here in the perfect tense, indicating an established, standing reputation rather than a single act of testimony
English variants”has been well spoken of,” “has a good reputation,” “is testified to”
Contextual theological meaningThe doctrinal core of “Commendation of Faithful Witness (Demetrius).” Demetrius is commended by the strongest possible double testimony: universal human report (“by all”) AND “by the truth itself” — personified ἀλήθεια is presented as itself bearing witness, meaning Demetrius’s character is so consistent with gospel truth that the truth “testifies” through the observable facts of his life
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Render سب کی طرف سے اُس کی گواہی دی گئی ہے، بلکہ خود سچائی کی طرف سے بھی۔ Reuse گواہی (never شہادت, per v. 3 note above) consistently. The personification “truth itself testifies” is a striking rhetorical figure that should be preserved rather than flattened to a simpler “everyone agrees he is good,” since it makes the theological point that Demetrius’s life is a visible embodiment of ἀλήθεια, reinforcing the letter’s “Truth and Christian Fellowship” doctrine — his reputation is not merely social consensus but a genuine correspondence between his conduct and the gospel reality.

FieldContent
Original wordἡ μαρτυρία ἡμῶν ἀληθής
Transliterationhē martyria hēmōn alēthēs
Literal meaning”our testimony is true”
Semantic rangeCombines μαρτυρία (“testimony,” noun form of the same root) with ἀληθής (adjectival form of ἀλήθεια, “true, truthful”)
English variants”our testimony is true,” “you know that what we say is true”
Contextual theological meaningThe Elder underwrites his own commendation of Demetrius with the same reliability-claim used throughout the letter for ἀλήθεια — his testimony, like Demetrius’s own life and like Gaius’s reputation, is trustworthy and verifiable, not mere flattery or rhetoric
Destination-language rendering riskHIGH [NEW]. Render ہماری گواہی سچی ہے (hamārī gawāhī sachī hai). Keep گواہی (testimony) and سچائی/سچی (truth/true) vocabulary consistent with all prior occurrences in this letter (vv. 3, 6, 12) so the letter’s repeated ἀλήθεια-μαρτυρία wordplay remains visible to an Urdu reader tracking the letter’s argument as a whole.

Verse 13

Greek: Πολλὰ εἶχον γράψαι σοι ἀλλ᾿ οὐ θέλω διὰ μέλανος καὶ καλάμου σοι γράψαι· Gloss: “I had many things to write to you, but I do not wish to write to you with ink and pen.”

FieldContent
Original wordμέλανος / καλάμου
Transliterationmelanos / kalamou
Literal meaning”ink / reed [pen]“
Semantic rangeConcrete writing implements of the ancient world; a stock epistolary closing formula (cf. 2 John 12) expressing a preference for face-to-face communication over what a letter alone can convey
English variants”ink and pen,” “pen and paper”
Contextual theological meaningNo independent doctrinal weight; a literary/cultural convention signaling the letter’s intentionally partial, occasional character — there is more to say than a short letter permits
Destination-language rendering riskLOW. Render سیاہی اور قلم (siyāhī aur qalam). No collision risk; concrete, low-ambiguity vocabulary, though translators may note this is a literary convention (like “I’ll say more when we meet”) rather than a literal statement about writing materials being unavailable.

Verse 14

Greek: ἐλπίζω δὲ εὐθέως σε ἰδεῖν, καὶ στόμα πρὸς στόμα λαλήσομεν. Εἰρήνη σοι. ἀσπάζονταί σε οἱ φίλοι. ἀσπάζου τοὺς φίλους κατ᾿ ὄνομα. Gloss: “But I hope to see you soon, and we will speak mouth to mouth. Peace to you. The friends greet you. Greet the friends by name.”

FieldContent
Original wordστόμα πρὸς στόμα
Transliterationstoma pros stoma
Literal meaning”mouth to mouth”
Semantic rangeA Hebraic idiom (cf. Num 12:8 LXX, “mouth to mouth” of God speaking directly to Moses) for direct, unmediated, face-to-face communication
English variants”face to face,” “in person,” “speak directly”
Contextual theological meaningReinforces the letter’s closing preference for personal presence over written correspondence, echoing v. 13; no independent doctrinal content, but continues the relational warmth that frames the whole letter
Destination-language rendering riskLOW. Do not translate literally as “mouth to mouth” (منہ سے منہ ملا کر), which would sound strange or even physically intimate in Urdu idiom. Render idiomatically as آمنے سامنے (āmne sāmne, “face to face”) or روبرو (rūbarū, “in person”), per this Language Package’s idiom-handling rule preferring natural target-language equivalents that preserve meaning over literal calques.

FieldContent
Original wordΕἰρήνη
Transliterationeirēnē
Literal meaning”peace”
Semantic rangePer baseline: relational, covenantal peace; here functioning as a standard epistolary benediction/closing greeting (cf. its use throughout the NT letters and dominical greeting, John 20:19, 21)
English variants”Peace to you,” “Peace be with you”
Contextual theological meaningA simple, warm closing blessing invoking God’s peace on Gaius, continuous with (though less doctrinally weighted here than) Romans 5:1’s “peace with God through justification”
Destination-language rendering riskMEDIUM. Reuse baseline term صلح for consistency with the established Language Package convention (see baseline “peace” entry), rendering تمہیں صلح ہو یا خدا کی طرف سے تمہیں صلح حاصل ہو. Contextual note: because this is a bare greeting formula, it will closely resemble the structure of the common Islamic salutation السلام علیکم (as-salāmu ‘alaikum, “peace be upon you”) in the reader’s ear — this is a genuine point of cultural/linguistic resonance (both traditions share the Semitic peace-greeting root) that can be leveraged pastorally as a bridge, provided the passage is not taught as claiming the two greetings are doctrinally identical. Flag for native speaker review to confirm register and avoid the greeting sounding like a direct, unremarked-upon borrowing of the Islamic salutation formula.

FieldContent
Original wordοἱ φίλοι / τοὺς φίλους
Transliterationhoi philoi / tous philous
Literal meaning”the friends”
Semantic rangeφίλος: “friend,” from φιλία (affectionate, loyal friendship) — notably NOT the letter’s usual ἀδελφός (“brother”); a deliberate closing shift to more intimate, personal-network language, likely reflecting the small, patronage-based house-church circle in view
English variants”the friends,” “our friends”
Contextual theological meaningThe shift from ἀδελφοί (used throughout for the broader Christian community/traveling ministers) to φίλοι in the closing greeting signals the letter’s underlying social reality: a close, personal circle of named individuals (Gaius, Demetrius, and others “by name”) bound by both faith and personal friendship — the letter’s warmth is not abstract but rooted in real, named relationships
Destination-language rendering riskLOW-MEDIUM [NEW]. Render دوست (dost, “friend[s]”). Keep distinct from بھائی (brothers) used elsewhere in the letter, preserving the deliberate register-shift in the Greek; do not default to بھائی here simply because it has been the letter’s dominant term for fellow believers up to this point.

Proper names in the core passage

NameGreekUrdu renderingTransliterationRiskNote
GaiusΓάϊοςگایسGā’yasLowEstablished transliteration form; the letter’s primary addressee, commended for hospitality
DiotrephesΔιοτρέφηςدیوترفیسDiyotrefīsLow-MediumProper name of the letter’s negative example; no translation risk in the name itself, but the surrounding vocabulary describing him (φιλοπρωτεύων, v. 9) carries the doctrine’s main risk (see above)
DemetriusΔημήτριοςدیمیتریسDēmītrīsLowProper name of the letter’s positive example, commended in v. 12

2. Chapter-by-Chapter Coverage of the Whole Book

Chapter 1 (the entire book, verses 1–14): Fully treated verse-by-verse in Section 1 above. As noted in Section 0, 3 John contains only one chapter, and that chapter is coextensive with the assigned core passage (1:1–14); there is no remaining, untreated material anywhere in the book. This satisfies the full-book-coverage requirement completely: every verse of 3 John has received explicit term-level analysis above. No chapter of this book is reviewed-but-silently-omitted; there is exactly one chapter, and it has received the deepest tier of analysis available in this framework (verse-by-verse, term-by-term), exceeding the standard chapter-section treatment that would apply to a multi-chapter book.


3. Summary of Doctrine-to-Term Mapping

Curriculum doctrinePrimary Greek termsPrimary Urdu renderingsRisk tier
Hospitality to Traveling Ministersξένος, προπέμπω, ὑπολαμβάνω, ἀδελφός, ὀφείλομενمہمان، روانہ کرنا، سہارا دینا، بھائی، لازم ہےHigh
Imitating Good rather than Evilμιμέομαι, ἀγαθόν, κακόν, ἀγαθοποιῶν, κακοποιῶνپیروی کرنا، نیکی، برائی، نیکی کرنے والا، برائی کرنے والاHigh
Church Leadership and Pride (Diotrephes)φιλοπρωτεύων, ἐπιδέχομαι, καταλαλέω, κωλύω, ἐκβάλλωسرداری پسند، قبول کرنا، بدگوئی کرنا، روکنا، خارج کر دیناHigh
Commendation of Faithful Witness (Demetrius)μαρτυρέω, μαρτυρία, ἀληθήςگواہی دینا، گواہی، سچیHigh
Truth and Christian Fellowshipἀλήθεια, ἀγάπη, ἐκκλησία, φίλος, ἀδελφόςسچائی، محبت، کلیسیا، دوست، بھائیHigh

End of 07_semantic_analysis.md

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words