Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Linguistic Gap Analysis

Linguistic Gap Analysis: Acts (English–Urdu)

Purpose and Method

This document executes Phase 1 Step 8 for the Acts curriculum, extending (never contradicting) the baseline Romans/Galatians translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, and doctrine_risk_registry.json, and incorporating the Acts-specific terminology already seeded in 08_core_glossary.md and the Acts additions to bible_term_registry.json. It answers four questions for every doctrine named in the curriculum parameters and for the book as a whole:

  1. What Urdu vocabulary is available for this doctrine, and what does each candidate term cost us?
  2. Where is vocabulary missing outright, versus where is it crowded by a pre-existing, differently-freighted Islamic theological or legal term that must be fenced off?
  3. Where should the AI transliterate (retain a Greek/Aramaic/proper-name form) versus paraphrase (build a descriptive Urdu phrase) versus reuse an existing shared word with mandatory annotation?
  4. Of all the ambiguities surfaced, which carry the highest risk, ranked, so Phase 2 review routing can be prioritized?

Coverage is full-book: every chapter of Acts 1–28 is accounted for in the chapter coverage table (Part 5), even where a chapter introduces no new vocabulary beyond what Parts 1–4 already resolve.


Part 1 — Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix

For each doctrine named in the curriculum parameters: available Urdu terms, their weaknesses, and the recommended strategy. All renderings below are already recorded in translation_memory.json/bible_term_registry.json (baseline) or 08_core_glossary.md (Acts additions) and must be enforced exactly; this matrix explains why.

1. The Holy Spirit and Pentecost

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
Holy Spiritروح القدسIS a Qur’anic phrase (Qur’an 2:87, 2:253, 16:102), traditionally identified in tafsir with Jibreel, not a co-equal divine PersonReuse (no alternative exists that readers would recognize); mandatory personhood/deity annotation at every doctrinally load-bearing occurrence, intensified in Acts by 5:3 (Spirit personally lied to) and 15:28 (Spirit personally decides)
Pentecostپن‌تِکُست کا تہوارعید (the generic festival word) triggers immediate Eid al-Fitr/Eid al-Adha associationTransliterate the proper name + پیر neutral تہوار; never عید
Tongues (glossolalia)دیگر زبانیںRisk of collapse into generic ecstatic-speech phenomena recognized in regional devotional traditions (e.g., some dhikr practice)Paraphrase (“other/different languages”), not a coined technical term; anchor every occurrence to the text’s own claim that these are real, intelligible human languages confirmed by hearers (2:6,8,11)
Gift of the Holy Spiritروح القدس کی بخششRisk of conflation with روحانی نعمتیں (baseline spiritual_gifts, ongoing ministry-enablements)Keep the two categories lexically distinct: بخشش (foundational, once-for-all, at conversion) vs نعمتیں (ongoing, variously distributed)
Vision/dreamرویا / خوابGenuinely shared vocabulary with Islamic ru’ya/istikhara dream-guidance traditionReuse with a framing note: unrepeated, apostolic-founding-narrative authority, not a general personal-guidance technique for ongoing replication

Recommended strategy overall: Treat Pentecost (Acts 2) as the doctrinal anchor chapter where the Holy Spirit’s personhood must be taught most explicitly, since the book’s entire subsequent narrative (4:8, 4:31, 6:3, 7:55, 9:17, 13:9, 13:52, 15:28) assumes what chapter 2 establishes.

2. The Gospel to Jews and Gentiles

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
Gentilesغیر قوموںNone significant if کافر is excludedReuse; never کافر (baseline forbidden substitution), reinforced by Acts’ unusually high frequency (9:15; 10:45; 11:1,18; 13:46-48; 15:3-23; 28:28)
Clean/uncleanپاک / ناپاکStructural parity with the Islamic حلال/حرام dietary-law system, currently and widely practicedReuse پاک/ناپاک (already established from the baseline “holy” entry), explicitly not حلال/حرام, to avoid the text being read as a verdict on contemporary Islamic dietary law rather than OT dietary-purity categories
God shows no partialityخدا کسی کا طرفدار نہیںGenuine resonance with Qur’anic divine-impartiality affirmations, risking a premature “we already agree” readingReuse with explicit teaching that the specific application (Gentiles fully included through faith in Christ, on equal terms with Jews, without circumcision/law) exceeds the shared premise
Unknown Godنامعلوم خداRisk of pluralist misreading (“all religions worship this same God under different names, Islam included”)Reuse with explicit framing toward exclusive identification and the call to repent (17:30-31), never toward equivalence

Recommended strategy overall: This doctrine’s linguistic risk is not a missing-word problem but a false-agreement problem: several available terms and formulas sound like immediate common ground with Islamic theology and must be taught with the “yes, and also” contrastive move rather than left as though the resonance settles the matter.

3. Repentance and Baptism

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
RepentanceتوبہSimultaneously the established Christian term and the central Islamic tawbah concept, operating within a mercy-weighed-against-deeds frameworkReuse (no alternative exists that would be recognized); mandatory contrastive teaching every doctrinally load-bearing occurrence (2:38; 3:19; 17:30; 26:20), joining repentance immediately to baptism and the Spirit’s gift, not a standalone act awaiting a separate future reckoning
BaptismبپتسمہRisk of collapse into غسل (ghusl) or وضو (wudu), repeatable Islamic ritual-purity actsRetain the transliterated Christian term; explicitly one-time, tied to Christ’s death/resurrection, forgiveness, and the Spirit — never a repeatable purification rite
Call on the name of the Lordخداوند کے نام کا پکارناCombines two Critical baseline terms (خداوند, نجات) in a single formulaRender identically at 2:21; 9:14,21; 22:16, and identically again wherever Romans 10:9-13 is cross-referenced, per baseline cross-document consistency rule
John’s baptism vs. baptism in Jesus’s name(no separate lexical item; distinguished by modifier)Risk of flattening 18:25 and 19:1-5’s internal distinction into a single undifferentiated “baptism”Preserve the qualifying phrases (یوحنا کا بپتسمہ / خداوند یسوع کے نام سے بپتسمہ) explicitly at each occurrence; do not compress

Recommended strategy overall: توبہ is this doctrine’s single highest-density shared-word risk in the whole curriculum (structurally identical in kind to نجات in the baseline); Acts 2:38, the core passage’s climactic verse, is the highest-priority single occurrence for contrastive teaching in this entire Phase 1 output.

4. The Church as Community

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
ChurchکلیسیاNone if مسجد/امت excludedReuse; never مسجد or امت
Having all things in commonسب کچھ مل کر بانٹناRisk of being read as enforced communal property, or as a substitute obligation parallel to zakat/sadaqahFrame explicitly as voluntary, love-motivated sharing, distinct in mechanism and obligation-structure from zakat/sadaqah, without denigrating the latter
Breaking of breadروٹی توڑناRisk of over-defining as the later formalized Eucharistic riteKeep descriptive at this narrative stage (2:42,46; 20:7,11); do not import later sacramental theology not yet established in the text
Elders/overseersبزرگ / نگہرانبزرگ carries Sufi pir/elder devotional-veneration associations in popular usageFrame explicitly as a functional teaching-and-shepherding office among equals, echoing the baseline’s caution against ولی for “saints”
General favor (2:47)لوگوں کی نظر میں پسندیدگیRisk of confusion with فضل (baseline Critical soteriological grace) if rendered the same wayKeep lexically distinct from فضل; this is social goodwill, not saving grace
Nazirite-type vowنذرNone significant — genuine positive bridge with Islamic nadhrReuse, framed as Paul’s cultural accommodation to Jewish custom (21:23-26), not a gospel requirement

Recommended strategy overall: This doctrine has the fewest acute collision risks in the curriculum; the main task is fencing (keeping فضل/پسندیدگی and بزرگ/ولی pairs from bleeding into each other) rather than resolving denial or negation risk.

5. Apostolic Authority and Miracles

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
ApostleرسولRead through the Quranic scripture-bearing-messenger paradigm culminating in Muhammad as “seal of the prophets”Reuse with the baseline’s clarifying note; anchor Acts’ own qualification (eyewitness resurrection-testimony, 1:22) as the defining criterion, distinct from that paradigm
Signs and wondersنشان اور عجائباتمعجزہ (miracle, singular) is the standard Islamic technical term for a prophet’s authenticating signPrefer the compound نشان اور عجائبات over bare معجزہ; teach as authenticating Jesus’s unique divine identity/lordship/resurrection specifically, not adding apostles to a shared generic prophet-miracle category
Servant (pais) titleخدا کا خادمRisk of confusion with ‘Abduhu (His servant), the Islamic devotional honorific for MuhammadAnchor explicitly to Isaiah’s Suffering Servant fulfilled uniquely in Jesus
Spirit of divinationغیب گوئی کی روحBare روح risks conflation with روح القدسAlways qualify with بد روح (evil/unclean spirit); never share vocabulary with the Holy Spirit entry
Council decreeفیصلہفتویٰ (fatwa) is the specific, live Islamic juridical-ruling term issued by a qualified religious authorityForbidden substitution: never فتویٰ; the council’s Spirit-and-elders collegial model (15:28) has no true Islamic-authority-structure parallel

Recommended strategy overall: The main fencing task here is separating apostolic/Spirit-empowered authority language from three adjacent, well-known Islamic authority categories (prophethood, prophetic miracle, and juridical fatwa) that a reader might otherwise assume as the default frame.

6. Persecution and Bold Witness

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
WitnessگواہMust not be prematurely read as “martyr”Keep the “testifier” sense primary; distinguish from the developing martyr sense (below)
Martyr (of Stephen)شہیدSimultaneously established Christian vocabulary and the central Islamic term for one who dies defending the faith, frequently associated with jihad/armed struggle and popular automatic-paradise beliefReuse (no viable alternative), but mandatory explicit teaching every occurrence that Stephen’s death is suffered, non-violent, and forgiving (7:60) — the opposite posture from the jihad-martyrdom paradigm
Blasphemyکفر / گستاخیCRITICAL AND DISTINCT IN KIND: collides with live Pakistani/Indian criminal law (e.g. PPC 295-C), not merely historical doctrine, with documented mob-violence historyMandatory contextual-safety note at every occurrence (ch. 6-7, 26:11); combined theologian + native-speaker legal-context review, not either alone
BoldnessدلیریRisk of being taught as encouragement toward public confrontation/defianceFrame strictly as confident, unashamed proclamation flowing from conviction — per the baseline’s persecution/apostasy pastoral-safety framework, never a summons to increase real-world exposure
The Wayیہ راہClose parallel to Qur’an’s “straight path” (al-sirat al-mustaqim) and shari’ah’s etymologyUsable as a genuine bridge point, but must specify: following the crucified and risen Jesus as Lord specifically, not a generic interchangeable path-metaphor

Recommended strategy overall: بلاسفیمی/گستاخی is the single term in this entire Language Package (Romans + Galatians + Acts) whose primary risk is contemporary legal exposure rather than historical-theological collision; it requires review protocols distinct from every other Critical term in the package.

7. Conversion of Paul

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
Conversion (of Paul)رجوعRisk of assimilation to the Islamic “reversion” concept (return to innate Muslim nature, fitrah)Frame explicitly as sovereign, Christ-initiated interruption and re-commissioning of a zealous, sincerely practicing religious man — not a return to an original nature
Chosen instrumentچنا ہوا برتنTies to the baseline election entry (خدا کا انتخاب)Reuse the baseline’s caution regarding تقدیر; do not let “chosen” drift into the taqdir predestination debate without direct engagement
SatanشیطانGenuinely shared, low-risk vocabularyReuse without extensive caveat (26:18); minor translator-awareness note on the Iblis/shaytan distinction only

Recommended strategy overall: Paul’s threefold retelling of his own conversion (ch. 9, 22, 26) should render identically across all three occurrences per the baseline’s cross-document consistency principle, since Acts itself treats consistency of testimony as evidentially significant.

8. Justification apart from the Law

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
Justificationراستباز ٹھہرایا جاناRisk of collapsing into معافی پانا (mere forgiveness), assimilable to Islamic mercy-at-judgment framingReuse the exact baseline compound at 13:39, the direct narrative bridge to Romans/Galatians
Works of the lawشریعت کے اعمالاعمال is itself a live Islamic deeds-at-judgment termAnchor to Mosaic Torah-observance specifically at every occurrence (15:1,5 implicit; 13:39); never bare اعمال
CircumcisionختنہCurrently, widely practiced Islamic sunnah, not a historical curiosityDistinguish requiring circumcision for justification (denied, ch. 15) from the practice itself (not condemned, 16:3); mandatory theologian review every occurrence
Council decreeفیصلہSee above (Apostolic Authority)Never فتویٰ

Recommended strategy overall: Acts 15 is the narrative enactment of the very controversy Galatians treats doctrinally; every rendering choice made for Galatians’ works_of_the_law, circumcision, and law_and_grace entries must be reused identically here rather than re-derived, preserving curriculum-wide consistency.

9. The Great Commission Fulfilled

Available termUrduWeaknessStrategy
Ends of the earthزمین کی انتہا تکNone significantRender identically at 1:8 and 13:47; this is the book’s structural bracket-phrase
Kingdom of Godخدا کی بادشاہیRisk of political caliphate/khilafat associationReuse baseline caution; opens (1:3,6) and closes (28:23,31) the book
Unhinderedبلا روک ٹوکRisk of triumphalist over-translationPreserve the text’s own open, hopeful, non-triumphalist tone as the book’s deliberate final word
Missionبشارت کی خدمتدعوت/تبلیغ are specific competing-religion missionary technical termsNever دعوت/تبلیغ, per baseline forbidden substitution, reinforced through ch. 13-28

Recommended strategy overall: This doctrine’s vocabulary is comparatively low-risk on a term-by-term basis; the primary translation task is structural — making the 1:8 / 13:47 / 28:31 bracket audible in Urdu as a deliberate narrative arc, not merely three unrelated verses.


Part 2 — Missing Vocabulary vs. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods

2.1 Crowded semantic neighborhoods requiring active fencing

Acts intensifies several baseline crowding problems and introduces some new ones. “Fencing” here means: the term is correct and must be kept, but its neighbor-term(s) must be explicitly ruled out and the distinction taught, not merely assumed.

Urdu term (ours)Crowding neighbor (Islamic/cultural)What must be fenced
روح القدسJibreel-identified Qur’anic ruh al-qudusPersonhood, co-equal deity, capacity to be lied to (5:3) and to decide (15:28) — none possible for a created angel
توبہtawbah within the mizan/qiyamat frameworkImmediate union with baptism and Spirit-reception; not a standalone act awaiting separate future reckoning
شہیدjihad-martyrdom, popular automatic-paradise beliefSuffered, non-violent, forgiving posture (7:60)
کفر / گستاخیPPC 295-C and related contemporary criminal lawFirst-century Jewish legal-religious charge vs. present-day real legal exposure for the reader — two entirely different registers requiring separate framing
پاک / ناپاکحلال / حرام dietary law (currently practiced)OT ritual-purity abolition, not a verdict on contemporary Islamic dietary law
ختنہIslamic sunnah of khatna (currently practiced)Requirement-for-justification (denied) vs. the practice itself (not condemned)
رسولQuranic messenger-prophet paradigm, “seal of the prophets”Eyewitness-resurrection-testimony criterion (1:22), not scripture-bearing prophetic office
نشان اور عجائباتمعجزہ (prophetic authenticating miracle)Authentication of Jesus’s unique identity/lordship/resurrection, not a shared miracle-worker category
فیصلہفتویٰ (juridical ruling by qualified authority)Collegial Spirit-and-elders discernment model, no fatwa-issuing-authority parallel
بزرگSufi pir/wali devotional-veneration figureFunctional shepherding office among equals, not a veneration category
یہ راہal-sirat al-mustaqim / shari’ah (etymological “the way”)Following the crucified, risen Jesus as Lord specifically
رجوعIslamic “reversion” (return to fitrah)Sovereign Christ-initiated interruption of a sincere prior religious life, not return to an innate nature
آزادیapostasy/freedom-from-Islam framingFreedom from law-as-justification and sin’s dominion only; never license, defiance, or apostasy activism
نامعلوم خداpluralist “all paths lead to the same God” readingExclusive identification + call to repent, not equivalence
نذرIslamic nadhr (a genuine, positive shared practice)Low risk — flagged here as a positive bridge, not a danger, but still worth explicit framing (cultural accommodation, not gospel requirement) so it is not over-read as doctrinally load-bearing

2.2 Genuinely missing vocabulary (no adequate existing Urdu term)

Unlike the crowding cases above, these concepts have no pre-existing Urdu word carrying the needed sense at all, requiring coined compounds or paraphrase rather than fencing an existing term:

  1. Glossolalia as known, intelligible Spirit-given human language (2:4-11) — no single Urdu word distinguishes this from generic “speaking in tongues” as popularly understood in some charismatic-adjacent or ecstatic-devotional registers regionally. Resolved by paraphrase (دیگر زبانیں) plus mandatory framing that these are real, known human languages, confirmed by hearers — not private ecstatic utterance.
  2. The distinct once-for-all “gift” (dōrea) of the Spirit at conversion vs. ongoing “gifts” (charismata) for ministry — Urdu نعمت/بخشش vocabulary does not lexically force this distinction the way Greek’s two separate roots do. Resolved by disciplined, consistent separate compound usage (روح القدس کی بخشش vs. روحانی نعمتیں), never interchanged.
  3. A neutral, non-Eid-associated word for a Jewish pilgrimage festival — تہوار plus transliteration is a workaround, not a true equivalent, since Urdu’s festival vocabulary is otherwise saturated by Islamic festival associations (عید) or Hindu-festival associations (تہوار can occasionally evoke mela-type usage). Monitor for unwanted connotation drift in Phase 2 back-translation testing.
  4. A term for “chosen instrument” (skeuos eklogēs) that avoids both a mechanical-tool reading and premature identification with taqdir — چنا ہوا برتن (chosen vessel) is serviceable but should be reviewed alongside the baseline’s election entry rather than treated as a fully independent term.
  5. A precise Urdu equivalent for the internal John’s-baptism-vs-Spirit-baptism distinction (18:25; 19:1-5) — there is no single noun distinguishing the two; only the qualifying phrase preserves the distinction, and translators risk silently collapsing it under time/space pressure. Flag explicitly as a paraphrase-dependent, not lexicalized, distinction.

Part 3 — Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions

TermDecisionRenderingRationale
PentecostTransliterate + paraphraseپن‌تِکُست کا تہوارProper name preserved; تہوار avoids عید’s Islamic-festival pull
BaptismTransliterateبپتسمہEstablished Christian Greek-via-Syriac loanword; paraphrasing risks drifting into غسل/وضو territory
Tongues (glossolalia)Paraphraseدیگر زبانیںNo established transliteration; a coined loanword would obscure the text’s own “real known languages” claim more than a plain descriptive phrase does
JesusTransliterate (established form)یسوع (یسوع مسیح)Never bare عیسیٰ; baseline forbidden-substitution rule carried forward unchanged
MessiahTransliterate (shared with Qur’anic usage)مسیحShared proper title, correct per baseline, always with the “content beyond Qur’anic al-Masih” note
Christian (self-designation)Reuse established formal term, avoid colloquial alternativeمسیحی (not عیسائی in formal doctrinal material)مسیحی is the settled formal register; عیسائی is acceptable colloquially but not preferred here
RepentanceReuse existing shared word (no transliteration option exists)توبہAlready the established Christian term; transliterating a Greek metanoia-derived form would be unrecognizable and pastorally counterproductive
The WayParaphraseیہ راہNo transliteration tradition exists; paraphrase preserves the bridge-and-collision value with al-sirat al-mustaqim while remaining natural Urdu
Nazirite-type vowReuse existing Urdu/Islamic-shared term, no transliterationنذرGenuine positive bridge word already naturalized in Urdu religious vocabulary; transliterating “Nazirite” would add an unfamiliar technical term for no doctrinal gain
Council decreeParaphrase, explicitly avoiding the nearest transliteration-adjacent optionفیصلہ (never فتویٰ)فتویٰ is available and would be the “natural” transliteration-adjacent borrowing, but is explicitly forbidden due to differing authority-structure implications
Signs and wondersParaphrase (compound), avoiding the single-word Islamic-technical-term optionنشان اور عجائبات (never bare معجزہ)معجزہ is available and shorter, but its specific Islamic prophetic-authentication associations make the longer compound the safer choice
Amen, HallelujahTransliterate (per baseline)آمین, ہلelویاہAlready-established forms carried forward unchanged from the baseline package
Roman citizenship / Appeal to CaesarParaphrase (civil-legal, low doctrinal risk)رومی شہریت / قیصر سے اپیل کرناPurely descriptive; no transliteration tradition needed or expected

General rule for this curriculum: transliterate proper names, established loanwords, and liturgical exclamations already fixed in Urdu Christian tradition; paraphrase novel technical concepts (glossolalia, council decree, signs and wonders) where an available Islamic-technical-term transliteration exists but would misdirect the reader; reuse existing shared vocabulary with mandatory annotation where no better option exists at all (repentance, martyr, blasphemy, Holy Spirit).


Part 4 — Ranked List of Highest-Risk Ambiguities in Acts

Ranked by combined severity (doctrinal centrality × collision/crowding acuteness × real-world consequence for the reader), highest first:

  1. Acts 2:23, 2:36; 4:10; 5:30; 10:39 — the crucifixion accusation formula (“you crucified/killed him… God raised him”). Repeated across multiple independent sermons, reinforcing apostolic-consensus testimony against Qur’an 4:157’s explicit denial. Highest-priority escalation item in the whole curriculum; every occurrence mandatory theologian review.
  2. Acts 2:38 — repentance + baptism + forgiveness + gift of the Spirit, in one verse. The single densest convergence of four flagged terms (توبہ, بپتسمہ, گناہ, روح القدس کی بخشش) at the climax of the core passage itself; the contrastive-teaching burden is maximal here.
  3. Acts 6:11,13; 26:11 — blasphemy (کفر/گستاخی). Unique in this entire Language Package for colliding with live criminal law and documented mob-violence risk, not historical doctrine alone. Requires a review protocol (combined theologian + legal-context native-speaker) found nowhere else in the package.
  4. Acts 9:20; 13:33 — Son of God (خدا کا بیٹا). Inherits the baseline’s single most explosive doctrinal collision (Qur’an 4:171, 112:3); mandatory eternal-not-begotten annotation at every occurrence, now doubled by Acts’ narrative confirmation alongside the resurrection claim.
  5. Acts 15:1-29 — works of the law, circumcision, council decree. A three-term cluster where mis-anchoring any one (bare اعمال, unqualified ختنہ, or فتویٰ-style فیصلہ) collapses the entire Jerusalem Council narrative into either a generalized anti-religious-law statement or a false-parallel Islamic authority structure.
  6. Acts 10:14-15,28; 11:8-9; 15:9,20,29 — clean/unclean (پاک/ناپاک). Structural parity with the circumcision escalation; risk of being read as direct commentary on contemporary halal/haram practice rather than OT purity-law abolition.
  7. Acts 4:12 — “salvation in no one else.” The single most exclusivist salvation statement in the curriculum; نجات’s shared-word risk (mercy-weighed-at-judgment vs. Christ’s atonement) is here compressed into an absolute negative claim with no room for softening.
  8. Acts 7:54-60 — Stephen’s martyrdom (شہید). High risk of the jihad-martyrdom paradigm supplying the reader’s default frame unless the suffered, non-violent, forgiving posture is made explicit at first occurrence.
  9. Acts 5:3; 15:28 — Holy Spirit personhood. These two verses are the strongest available textual counter-evidence in Acts against the ruh al-qudus/Jibreel identification (a lied-to, decision-making Person, not a conveying angel); under-translation here weakens the whole book’s Pneumatology.
  10. Acts 16:30-31 — “What must I do to be saved?” Prime, high-visibility teaching text for the نجات contrastive requirement; frequently extracted for evangelistic use, raising the stakes of getting the framing right on a verse likely to circulate outside its full chapter context.
  11. Acts 17:22-31 — Unknown God / Areopagus speech. High risk of pluralist misreading at scale, since this is Acts’ most philosophically-framed, apparently-conciliatory speech; the turn toward exclusive repentance (17:30-31) must not be lost beneath the bridge-building opening.
  12. Acts 9, 22, 26 — Paul’s threefold conversion narrative (رجوع). Risk of quiet assimilation to the Islamic “reversion” concept across three retellings; consistency of framing across all three is itself part of the text’s persuasive strategy and must not drift between occurrences.
  13. Acts 1:8; 24:23 — freedom/apostasy-adjacent framing (آزادی). Lower doctrinal density than in Galatians but carries the same politically-resonant risk wherever teaching material extrapolates from Acts’ narrative into applied discipleship content.
  14. Acts 3:14-15 — “Holy and Righteous One,” “Author of Life.” Compounds two Critical baseline risks (پاک, راستبازی) immediately adjacent to a crucifixion-accusation clause; low frequency but high per-occurrence density.
  15. Acts 19:1-5; 18:25 — John’s baptism vs. baptism in Jesus’s name. Lower doctrinal stakes than items above, but the highest mechanical risk of silent flattening under translation-workflow time pressure, since no single lexical item carries the distinction — only careful phrase-level discipline does.

Part 5 — Full-Book Chapter Coverage Confirmation

Every chapter of Acts has been reviewed for terminology introduced or intensified beyond what Parts 1-4 above already resolve. Chapters not separately itemized here contribute no vocabulary beyond terms already covered.

Ch.Coverage status
1Covered above: kingdom_of_god, power_of_god, ends_of_the_earth, witness, promise (of the Father), apostle (replacement criterion, 1:22)
2Core passage; covered extensively above: pentecost, tongues, holy_spirit, repentance, baptism, gift_of_the_holy_spirit, call_on_the_name_of_the_lord, church-community terms, general_favor_nonsoteriological
3Covered above: servant_title_pais, holy_and_righteous_one, author_of_life, repentance, resurrection, covenant/promise
4Covered above: boldness, salvation (4:12), grace, one_heart_and_soul, having_all_things_in_common
5Covered above: signs_and_wonders, savior_title, boldness, angel_of_the_lord; Holy Spirit personhood (5:3) — see ranked risk item 9
6Covered above: blasphemy (charge against Stephen), church (deacon-function selection — no new lexical item beyond elders_overseers/church entries; reviewed, no additional term required)
7Covered above: covenant, promise, law, glory, martyr (developing sense); Stephen’s speech reviewed in full — dense OT-history content but no additional new-term risk beyond what covenant/promise/law entries already carry
8Covered above: gift_of_the_holy_spirit (Simon Magus), baptism, holy_spirit; Samaritan and Ethiopian-eunuch episodes reviewed — extend gentiles/gospel-inclusion themes already covered under Doctrine 2, no additional new term required
9Covered above: conversion_of_paul, chosen_instrument, the_way, baptism; Ananias/Tabitha healing miracles reviewed — covered by signs_and_wonders entry, no additional term required
10Covered above: clean_unclean, god_shows_no_partiality, gift_of_the_holy_spirit (Gentiles), vision_dream, tongues
11Covered above: christian_name (Antioch), repentance, gift_of_the_holy_spirit; Jerusalem church’s response reviewed — no additional term beyond gentiles/god_shows_no_partiality entries
12Covered above: angel_of_the_lord; Herod’s death (glory-misappropriation, 12:23) reviewed under baseline glory entry — no additional new term required
13Covered above: messiah, justification (13:39), resurrection, promise, savior_title, boldness, ends_of_the_earth (13:47); Cyprus/sorcerer episode (Bar-Jesus) reviewed — covered by spirit_of_divination-adjacent occult framing, no additional term required
14Covered above: signs_and_wonders, tribulation_persecution, kingdom_of_god, grace; Lystra healing/near-worship-of-Paul-and-Barnabas episode reviewed — no additional new term beyond glory/idolatry framing already established
15Covered above: works_of_the_law, circumcision, council_decree, freedom/yoke, gentiles — the Jerusalem Council, this book’s densest single-chapter concentration of Doctrine 8 vocabulary
16Covered above: spirit_of_divination, baptism, salvation (16:30-31), roman_citizenship; Timothy circumcision reference (16:3) reviewed under the ch. 15 circumcision entry, no new term required
17Covered above: unknown_god, resurrection (Athens debate), repentance (17:30), god_shows_no_partiality-adjacent idol-critique
18Covered above: baptism (Apollos, John’s-baptism distinction, 18:25); Corinth/Gallio episode reviewed — no additional new term beyond church/law entries already established
19Covered above: baptism (disciples of John re-baptized, 19:1-5), tongues, the_way (riot, 19:9,23); Ephesian magic-scroll-burning episode reviewed — covered by spirit_of_divination/occult framing already established, no additional new term required
20Covered above: elders_overseers, tribulation_persecution, breaking_of_bread (20:7,11)
21Covered above: vow_nazirite, law; arrest-in-temple riot reviewed — no additional new term beyond the_way/blasphemy-adjacent persecution framing already established
22Covered above: conversion_of_paul (retelling), call_on_the_name_of_the_lord (22:16), roman_citizenship, the_way (22:4)
23Covered above: resurrection (Pharisee/Sadducee debate — see ranked risk discussion under Doctrine-1/Eschatology distinguishing note); roman_citizenship
24Covered above: the_way, freedom (loose custody, non-doctrinal sense), hope, law
25Covered above: appeal_to_caesar; Festus/Agrippa hearing reviewed — no additional new term required
26Covered above: conversion_of_paul (third retelling), hope, satan, blasphemy (26:11), boldness (26:26)
27Covered above: providence (27:22-24), breaking_of_bread (27:35); shipwreck narrative reviewed — no additional new term beyond providence/roman-legal-context entries already established
28Covered above: unhindered, kingdom_of_god, boldness; Malta snake-bite episode reviewed — covered by signs_and_wonders/providence framing already established, no additional new term required

Conclusion: All 28 chapters of Acts have been reviewed. No chapter contributes doctrinal or terminological content requiring a new entry beyond those already resolved in Parts 1-4 of this analysis and the accompanying 08_core_glossary.md/bible_term_registry.json additions. This linguistic gap analysis is ready to inform Phase 1 Step 2 (doctrine_risk_registry.json extension for Acts) and the Phase 2 translation pipeline’s pre-flight checklist.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words