Semantic Analysis: 2 Peter (Koine Greek → Kurdish)

Methodology

This analysis covers the entire book of 2 Peter (3 chapters), in the original Koine Greek. The core passage (2 Peter 1:16-21) receives verse-by-verse treatment of every load-bearing term. Every other chapter receives a chapter-section treatment of its load-bearing theological terms with the same analytical fields: original word, transliteration, literal meaning, semantic range, English variants, contextual theological meaning, and destination-language (Kurdish) rendering risk.

Baseline reuse rule: Any term already established in the Romans translation_memory.json (faith, grace, righteousness, lord, Jesus, Christ/Messiah, God, holy, holy_spirit, calling, called, election, kingdom_of_god, apostle, power_of_god, prophet, prophecy, sin, salvation, son_of_god, glory) is reused here exactly as recorded in the baseline. This document does not re-derive those renderings; it notes where 2 Peter activates a baseline term in a new way and flags any new collocation risk.

New terms are those not present in the baseline Romans package; 2 Peter, as an epistle centered on epistemology of revelation, moral formation, and eschatology, introduces substantial new load-bearing vocabulary not present in Romans. These are proposed here for the first time and must be entered into translation_memory.json at Phase 1 Step 8/Phase 2 onboarding.

---

PART A — Core Passage Verse-by-Verse: 2 Peter 1:16-21

2 Peter 1:16

Greek: Οὐ γὰρ σεσοφισμένοις μύθοις ἐξακολουθήσαντες ἐγνωρίσαμεν ὑμῖν τὴν τοῦ Κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ δύναμιν καὶ παρουσίαν, ἀλλ᾽ ἐπόπται γενηθέντες τῆς ἐκείνου μεγαλειότητος. Gloss: “For we did not follow cunningly devised myths/fables when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty.”

• σεσοφισμένοις μύθοις (sesophismenois mythois) — “cunningly devised fables/myths.” Literally “myths that have been made wise/clever” (perfect passive participle of σοφίζω, “to make wise/contrive”). Semantic range: fabricated stories, legendary tales, contrasted with historical eyewitness report. English variants: “cunningly devised fables” (KJV), “cleverly invented stories” (NIV), “myths” (ESV). Theological meaning: Peter explicitly denies that the apostolic gospel is invented legend — grounding the doctrine of Scripture’s reliability in verifiable eyewitness history. Kurdish rendering risk: Low-Medium. Proposed: “çîrokên serdest hatine çêkirin” (cleverly fabricated tales). No direct religious collision; functions as a contrast term to eyewitness testimony below.

• δύναμιν καὶ παρουσίαν (dynamin kai parousian) — “power and coming.” δύναμις (dynamis) reuses baseline power_of_god → Hêza Xwedê, here applied specifically to Christ. παρουσία (parousia) — literally “presence/arrival,” the technical term for a ruler’s official visit or a person’s bodily arrival. Semantic range: presence, arrival, official coming, and in NT eschatology, the technical term for Christ’s second, visible, bodily return. English variants: “coming,” “arrival,” “advent,” “presence.” Contextual meaning: most interpreters read this as the Transfiguration functioning as a preview/guarantee of the future Parousia (tying to ch. 3’s scoffer debate). Kurdish rendering risk: Critical. Proposed: “Hatina Xudan” (the Coming of the Lord). CRITICAL because mainstream Sunni hadith tradition (not the Quran text itself, but widely taught popular eschatology) affirms its own doctrine of Isa’s future return — but as a prophet who defeats the false messiah (al-Dajjal), affirms Islam, breaks crosses, ends Christian worship of him as divine, and later dies a natural death. This is a substantive, specific competing return-narrative that could be silently substituted for the biblical Parousia if not explicitly distinguished at every occurrence: Christ returns not as a prophet vindicating another religion but as the divine Judge and Lord returning in his own glory (v. 16’s “his majesty”).

• ἐπόπται (epoptai) — “eyewitnesses.” Literally “those who have seen/overseen” (epi + horaō). Semantic range: firsthand observers; in classical usage, also the technical term for initiates who had reached the highest grade of the Eleusinian mystery religions and “seen” the sacred vision. English variants: “eyewitnesses,” “spectators.” Contextual theological meaning: Peter deliberately claims public, historical, sensory eyewitness testimony — the opposite of esoteric private “seeing.” This is a key term for the Reliability of Scripture doctrine: apostolic testimony rests on witnessed history, not mystical vision. Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. Proposed: “şahidên bi çavên xwe dîtine” (witnesses who saw with their own eyes). No live regional mystery-cult collision, but must be rendered so as to clearly emphasize ordinary sensory witness, since Kurdish audiences with Sufi background could otherwise assimilate “seeing” language into a mystical-vision (kashf) framework.

• μεγαλειότης (megaleiotēs) — “majesty.” Related to but distinct from δόξα (glory, baseline Rûmet). Semantic range: greatness, magnificence, splendor of a sovereign. English variants: “majesty,” “greatness,” “grandeur.” Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. Proposed: “Mezinahî” (majesty/greatness), kept distinct from Rûmet so the text’s two related-but-different glory-words (δόξα in v.17, μεγαλειότης here) are not collapsed into one Kurdish term.

2 Peter 1:17

Greek: λαβὼν γὰρ παρὰ Θεοῦ Πατρὸς τιμὴν καὶ δόξαν φωνῆς ἐνεχθείσης αὐτῷ τοιᾶσδε ὑπὸ τῆς μεγαλοπρεποῦς δόξης, Οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ Υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός, εἰς ὃν ἐγὼ εὐδόκησα. Gloss: “For he received from God the Father honor and glory when such a voice was borne to him by the Majestic Glory: ‘This is my Son, my Beloved, in whom I am well pleased.’”

• Θεοῦ Πατρὸς (Theou Patros) — “God the Father.” Reuses baseline god → Xwedê and father → Bav exactly. Contextual note: here in explicit relational connection to the Son at the Transfiguration — reinforcing the baseline’s caution that Bav must be understood as a personal, relational Father-title, not merely an honorific.

• τιμὴν καὶ δόξαν (timēn kai doxan) — “honor and glory.” δόξα reuses baseline glory → Rûmet. τιμή (timē) is new: “honor, value, price paid.” Semantic range: honor, worth, price. English variants: “honor,” “esteem.” Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. Proposed: “Rêz” (honor/respect) or “Qedr” (worth/dignity); recommend “Rêz û Rûmet” as the paired phrase.

• φωνῆς ἐνεχθείσης (phōnēs enechtheisēs) — “a voice being borne/carried.” From φέρω (pherō, “to carry, bear along”) — the SAME verb root Peter reuses in v. 21 (φερόμενοι, “being borne along”) for how the prophets received Scripture. This is a deliberate literary link: the voice Peter personally heard at the Transfiguration and the prophetic word the OT prophets received are both described as things “borne/carried” by divine agency. This connection is a key exegetical anchor for the Reliability and Inspiration of Scripture doctrine and should be preserved or footnoted in translation, since it grounds Scripture’s authority in the same category of divine action Peter experienced firsthand. Kurdish rendering risk: High (translation-technique risk): if translated with two unrelated Kurdish verbs in vv. 17-18 and v. 21, this deliberate verbal echo is lost. Recommend using the same Kurdish verb root (hatin birin, “to be carried/borne”) in both places.

• ὁ Υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός (ho Huios mou ho agapētos) — “my Son, my Beloved.” Reuses baseline son_of_god → Kurê Xwedê in its underlying category (the Father’s declaration of the Son’s unique identity), rendered contextually here as “Kurê min ê delal” (my beloved Son) to preserve the first-person direct-address form of the Voice. Kurdish rendering risk: Critical — inherits the full Critical risk profile documented in baseline for son_of_god (Quranic denial in 112:3/19:35, and the inverted Kurdish-specific risk of Sufi wahdat al-wujud/Yazidi divine-manifestation over-assimilation). This is the single verse in 2 Peter where the Father himself makes the Sonship declaration audibly and publicly — the strongest possible textual anchor for teaching against both directions of error.

• εὐδόκησα (eudokēsa) — “I am well pleased / I have taken delight in.” Semantic range: settled, prior, sovereign pleasure/approval — not a reaction earned in the moment. English variants: “well pleased,” “delighted in.” Kurdish rendering risk: Low. Proposed: “ez pê razî me” (I am pleased with him) or “kêfa min pê tê” — low risk, standard.

2 Peter 1:18

Greek: καὶ ταύτην τὴν φωνὴν ἡμεῖς ἠκούσαμεν ἐξ οὐρανοῦ ἐνεχθεῖσαν, σὺν αὐτῷ ὄντες ἐν τῷ ἁγίῳ ὄρει. Gloss: “And we ourselves heard this voice borne from heaven, being with him on the holy mountain.”

• ἡμεῖς ἠκούσαμεν (hēmeis ēkousamen) — “we ourselves heard” — emphatic first-person plural, reinforcing the eyewitness/ear-witness claim of v. 16. Low risk; standard.

• ἐξ οὐρανοῦ (ex ouranou) — “from heaven.” Standard; low risk.

• ἐν τῷ ἁγίῳ ὄρει (en tō hagiō orei) — “on the holy mountain.” ἅγιος (hagios) reuses baseline holy → Pîroz exactly. Contextual note: referring to the Mount of Transfiguration, retroactively called “holy” because of what happened there — a historically anchored, event-specific holiness, distinct from a shrine venerated for ongoing pilgrimage. Kurdish rendering risk: Medium — Kurdish Yazidi tradition venerates specific holy sites (notably Lalish) as ongoing pilgrimage destinations; care should be taken in teaching that the “holy mountain” here is holy because of a unique historical revelation event, not an enduringly sacred geographic site for pilgrimage.

2 Peter 1:19

Greek: καὶ ἔχομεν βεβαιότερον τὸν προφητικὸν λόγον, ᾧ καλῶς ποιεῖτε προσέχοντες ὡς λύχνῳ φαίνοντι ἐν αὐχμηρῷ τόπῳ, ἕως οὗ ἡμέρα διαυγάσῃ καὶ φωσφόρος ἀνατείλῃ ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις ὑμῶν. Gloss: “And we have the prophetic word made more sure/confirmed, to which you do well to pay attention, as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.”

• βεβαιότερον τὸν προφητικὸν λόγον (bebaioteron ton prophētikon logon) — “the prophetic word [made] more sure/confirmed.” προφητικός relates to baseline prophecy → Pêxemberî. βεβαιότερον (comparative of bebaios, “firm, sure, guaranteed”) is new and theologically striking: Peter says Scripture’s prophetic word is more certain/confirmed than even his own eyewitness experience of the Transfiguration just described. English variants: “more sure,” “more fully confirmed,” “altogether reliable.” Theological meaning: this is the central textual claim for the Reliability and Inspiration of Scripture doctrine — Scripture’s authority does not depend on, and in fact exceeds, personal religious experience. Kurdish rendering risk: High. Proposed: “peyva pêxemberî ya hîn pirtir pêbawer/teyîdkirî” (the prophetic word, [made] even more reliable/confirmed). Must not be softened to mere “also trustworthy,” losing the comparative force; this is a strong claim of Scripture’s superior certainty that must be preserved intact.

• λύχνῳ φαίνοντι ἐν αὐχμηρῷ τόπῳ (lychnō phainonti en auchmērō topō) — “a lamp shining in a dark/dry place.” Standard metaphor for Scripture’s guiding function. Low risk.

• φωσφόρος (phōsphoros) — “morning star / light-bearer” (literally “light-bringing,” from φῶς + φέρω — again the φέρω root). Semantic range: the planet Venus as morning star; by NT usage (cf. Revelation 22:16, where Christ calls himself “the bright morning star”), a messianic title anticipating Christ’s return. English variants: “morning star,” “daystar.” Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. Proposed: “Stêrka Sibê” (the star of morning). Directly linked to the parousia doctrine (v. 16) — this verse pictures the prophetic word sustaining believers until Christ’s own return dawns fully in their hearts; the messianic, not merely astronomical, sense must be taught explicitly.

2 Peter 1:20

Greek: τοῦτο πρῶτον γινώσκοντες, ὅτι πᾶσα προφητεία γραφῆς ἰδίας ἐπιλύσεως οὐ γίνεται. Gloss: “Knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from one’s own interpretation/releasing.”

• προφητεία γραφῆς (prophēteia graphēs) — “prophecy of Scripture.” Reuses baseline prophecy → Pêxemberî; γραφή (graphē, “writing, Scripture”) is new but straightforward — Kurdish “Nivîsara Pîroz” (Holy Writing), consistent with the established “Kitêba Pîroz” (Holy Book) naming convention. Low-Medium risk on its own.

• ἰδίας ἐπιλύσεως (idias epilyseōs) — “of its own interpretation/release” (ἐπίλυσις, “a releasing, unloosing,解 explanation”). Semantic range: private origin, one’s own solving/interpreting, personal unloosing of meaning. English variants: “of any private interpretation” (KJV), “a matter of one’s own interpretation” (ESV/NIV), “someone’s own idea” (NLT). Contextual theological meaning: the verse’s own grammar (verse 21 gives the reason, “for”) shows this is about the origin of prophecy — prophecy did not arise from a prophet’s own private initiative or ingenuity — not a statement restricting who may later read or interpret Scripture. Kurdish rendering risk: High. Proposed: “şîroveya kesane” (private/personal interpretation) — but requires a translator’s note distinguishing two possible misreadings: (1) it must NOT be rendered/taught as endorsing a clergy-only, ulama-style monopoly on legitimate interpretation (an easy but wrong parallel to the Sunni tafsir tradition, where authoritative Quranic interpretation is restricted to qualified scholars); nor (2) as denying the human author any personality or voice (which v. 21’s “being borne along” specifically preserves — see below). The verse is about the source of the prophecy (God, not the prophet’s own will), a distinct question from who may read Scripture today.

2 Peter 1:21

Greek: οὐ γὰρ θελήματι ἀνθρώπου ἠνέχθη ποτὲ προφητεία, ἀλλὰ ὑπὸ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου φερόμενοι ἐλάλησαν ἀπὸ Θεοῦ ἄνθρωποι. Gloss: “For prophecy was never brought/borne by the will of man, but men spoke from God, being borne along by the Holy Spirit.”

• θελήματι ἀνθρώπου (thelēmati anthrōpou) — “by the will of man.” Establishes the negative: human initiative is explicitly excluded as the source of prophecy. Low-Medium risk; straightforward.

• ὑπὸ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου φερόμενοι (hypo Pneumatos Hagiou pheromenoi) — “being borne along by the Holy Spirit.” Πνεῦμα Ἅγιον reuses baseline holy_spirit → Ruhê Pîroz exactly, with its documented Critical risk (regional tafsir identification of “Holy Spirit” with the angel Jibril/Gabriel) fully inherited here and requiring the same explicit created-being-versus-divine-Person correction. φερόμενοι (present passive participle of φέρω, “to carry, bear along” — the nautical image of a ship carried by the wind, cf. Acts 27:15,17 of Paul’s storm-driven ship) is new and is the single most theologically load-bearing word in the core passage for the doctrine of Scripture’s inspiration. Semantic range: to be carried, borne, driven along by an outside force while the vessel/person retains its own form and movement. English variants: “moved by” (KJV), “carried along by” (ESV/NIV), “borne along” (NASB). Kurdish rendering risk: CRITICAL. Proposed: “ji hêla Ruhê Pîroz ve hatin birin” (were carried/borne along by the Holy Spirit). This is CRITICAL because the mainstream regional Sunni doctrine of wahy (revelation) — especially as popularly understood regarding the Quran’s transmission to Muhammad — treats the human recipient as a passive channel for verbatim divine dictation (tanzīl, “sending down” of the exact words), with no admixture of the human messenger’s own vocabulary, style, or personality. The Greek φέρω metaphor (a ship carried by wind, still sailing under its own hull, rudder, and captain) is different in kind: it depicts the Spirit’s superintending, guiding action working through each human author’s own faculties, vocabulary, and personality — not replacing them. If this term is rendered or taught in a way that collapses into the wahy/tanzīl dictation model, 2 Peter’s own carefully chosen distinct verb is lost and readers will import a subtly but significantly different doctrine of inspiration. This distinction must be made explicit in any teaching material accompanying this verse, not left to be inferred.

• ἐλάλησαν ἀπὸ Θεοῦ ἄνθρωποι (elalēsan apo Theou anthrōpoi) — “men spoke from God.” Confirms the human authors truly spoke (in their own voice, their own act of speech) even while originating “from God” — reinforcing that inspiration does not erase human authorial agency. Medium risk; should be translated to preserve both halves of the paradox (truly human speech, truly divine origin).

---

PART B — Chapter-by-Chapter Study of the Whole Book

Chapter 1 (verses 1-15; vv. 16-21 treated above as core passage)

• ἀπόστολος (apostolos, “apostle”) — v.1. Reuses baseline apostle → Şandî exactly.
• δοῦλος (doulos, “servant/bondservant”) — v.1, Peter’s self-designation, “Simon Peter, a servant and apostle.” New term. Literal: “slave, bondservant.” Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. Proposed: “Xulam” (servant/bondservant). Pairs with δεσπότης below (ch. 2) — the doulos belongs wholly to a despotēs (master). Low-Medium collision risk; a humble self-designation of total ownership by the Master.
• σωτήρ (sōtēr, “Savior”) — v.1 (“our God and Savior Jesus Christ” — a single-article Greek construction grammatically identifying Jesus as “our God and Savior” in one breath, the same construction as Titus 2:13), also vv. 11, 2:20, 3:2, 3:18. New term, related to but distinct from baseline salvation → Rizgarî. Literal: “one who saves/delivers, rescuer.” Kurdish rendering risk: CRITICAL. Proposed: “Rizgarker” (deliverer/savior, agent-noun on the rizgarî root). CRITICAL for two compounding reasons: (1) Christological — 2 Peter 1:1’s grammar directly asserts the deity of Christ by calling him “our God and Savior” with a single definite article, making this one of the strongest single-verse deity-of-Christ texts in the NT; this force must not be diluted by translating “God” and “Savior” as if they referred to two separate figures. (2) Politically — baseline already flags rizgarî as saturated with Kurdish nationalist-liberation vocabulary (“Rizgariya Kurdistanê”); “Rizgarker” as a personal title applied to Jesus compounds this risk, since it could be heard as casting Jesus in the role of a national liberation hero/leader figure rather than the divine, personal Savior from sin. Every occurrence needs explicit personal/spiritual anchoring, exactly as the baseline requires for rizgarî itself.
• ἰσότιμον πίστιν (isotimon pistin, “faith of equal standing/privilege”) — v.1. πίστις reuses baseline faith → Îman. ἰσότιμος (“equal in honor/value”) is new, describing that Gentile believers receive faith of the same standing as the apostles’. Low-Medium risk; supports the baseline’s unity_of_jews_and_gentiles doctrine cluster.
• χάρις καὶ εἰρήνη (charis kai eirēnē, “grace and peace”) — v.2. Reuses baseline grace → Kerem and peace → Aştî exactly.
• ἐπίγνωσις (epignōsis, “full/true knowledge”) — vv. 2, 3, 8; also γνῶσις (gnōsis, plain “knowledge”) vv. 5, 6; 2:20; 3:18. New term family, central to 2 Peter as a whole. Literal: ἐπίγνωσις is γνῶσις intensified with ἐπί (“upon/toward”), often rendered “full knowledge” or “precise/personal knowledge.” Semantic range: from bare cognitive information to deep, personal, relational acquaintance. English variants: “knowledge,” “full knowledge,” “true knowledge,” “acknowledgment.” Contextual theological meaning: throughout 2 Peter, this is always relational knowledge of God/Christ specifically (never abstract knowledge), and stands opposed to the false teachers’ claims to superior spiritual insight (ch. 2). Kurdish rendering risk: High. Proposed: “Nasîn” (relational “knowing,” as one knows a person) for epignōsis, distinguished from “Zanîn” (knowing facts) where plain gnōsis appears. HIGH RISK because Kurdish Sufism (the Naqshbandi tradition already flagged in baseline for kerem/keramet) places heavy weight on ma’rifa — mystical, experiential gnosis attained through advanced spiritual stations (maqamat), often understood as available only to spiritually elevated initiates. 2 Peter’s epignōsis must be taught as available to every believer through the ordinary means of Scripture and apostolic teaching (see 1:19-21), not as an esoteric attainment reserved for spiritual elites — directly relevant to the “Reliability and Inspiration of Scripture” doctrine’s stress on the prophetic word as a lamp for ALL believers.
• θεία δύναμις (theia dynamis, “divine power”) — v.3. Reuses power_of_god → Hêza Xwedê, modified: “Hêza wî ya xwedayî” (his divine power).
• ἀρετή (aretē, “virtue, moral excellence”) — vv.3, 5. New term. Literal: “excellence, virtue” (classical Greek used this of any excellence, including a god’s manifest power). English variants: “virtue,” “moral excellence,” “goodness.” Kurdish rendering risk: High. Proposed: “Fezîlet” (the common Kurdish/Arabic-loan term for virtue). HIGH RISK: 2 Peter 1:5-7 presents a step-by-step “add to X, Y” virtue ladder (faith → virtue → knowledge → self-control → endurance → godliness → brotherly affection → love) that bears a striking surface resemblance to the Sufi maqamat (stations) progression — a sequence of spiritual attainments a disciple ascends under a pîr’s guidance toward mystical perfection. This must be taught as the fruit of grace already given (v.3, “granted to us”), growing organically from a completed salvation, not a ladder of stages one climbs toward acceptance or spiritual elevation.
• θεῖα φύσις / θείας κοινωνοὶ φύσεως (theia physis, “divine nature” / “partakers of the divine nature”) — v.4. New term, arguably the single most theologically distinctive phrase in 2 Peter and the anchor of the “Divine Nature and Escaping Corruption” doctrine. Literal: “divine nature/essence.” English variants: “divine nature,” “God’s own nature,” “partakers/partners of the divine nature.” Kurdish rendering risk: CRITICAL. Proposed: “Xwezaya Xwedayî” (divine nature); “beşdarên Xwezaya Xwedayî” (partakers/sharers of the divine nature). CRITICAL for the same reason baseline flags incarnation and sonship as critical in Kurdish: Sufi wahdat al-wujud (“unity of being”) philosophy and Yazidi belief in successive divine manifestation through human figures create a genuine and specific risk that this phrase will be read as teaching human beings’ ontological merger or absorption into God’s own essence (fanā, self-annihilation into the Divine) — precisely the opposite of Peter’s point, which is moral transformation and escape from corruption (v.4b) through a real but creaturely participation in God’s moral character and promises, never a collapsing of the Creator-creature distinction.
• ἐπαγγέλματα (epangelmata, “promises”) — v.4. New but low-risk; “soz/wade” (promise). Reuses conceptually baseline’s covenant/promise category.
• φθορά (phthora, “corruption, decay, ruin”) — v.4 (“escape the corruption that is in the world”), also 2:12, 19. New term, central to the “Divine Nature and Escaping Corruption” doctrine. Literal: “decay, ruin, destruction, corruption” (from φθείρω, “to destroy/corrupt”). Semantic range: physical decay/perishing and moral corruption/depravity, often overlapping in Greek usage. English variants: “corruption,” “decay,” “depravity.” Kurdish rendering risk: High. Proposed: “Xirabûn” (corruption/decay). Must be distinguished from ritual/ceremonial defilement categories (see miasma below); this is a moral-cosmic decay tied to sin and death, escaped only through participation in the divine nature/promises, not through ritual purification.
• σπουδή (spoudē, “diligence, effort, earnestness”) — v.5. New, low-risk: “hewldan/bijartî” — recommend “hewldana mezin” (great effort/diligence).
• ἐγκράτεια (enkrateia, “self-control”) — v.6. New term. Literal: “inner strength, self-mastery, self-control” (from kratos, “power/might,” + en, “in”). Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. Proposed: “Xwerêvebirin” (self-governance/self-mastery). Note a genuine positive overlap-asset: the Islamic/Sufi concept of jihad al-nafs (struggle/discipline against the lower self) shares real conceptual territory here; this can be taught as a point of contact provided enkrateia is anchored as Spirit-produced fruit (cf. Galatians 5:23), not self-achieved ascetic discipline earning merit.
• ὑπομονή (hypomonē, “endurance, steadfastness, perseverance”) — v.6. New term. Literal: “remaining under” (hypo + menō, “to remain”). Kurdish rendering risk: HIGH. The natural, most common contemporary Kurdish word for this concept, “Berxwedan,” is saturated in modern Kurdish public discourse with a specific political-military resistance narrative (e.g., “Berxwedana Kobanê,” the Kurdish resistance struggle against ISIS, and decades of usage across the PKK/Kurdish national movements’ rhetoric). Using berxwedan risks the entire virtue list (and by extension Christian discipleship) being heard as continuous with the political resistance struggle rather than personal spiritual endurance under trial. Recommend the more neutral “Domdarî” (continuance, steadfast persistence) as the primary theological rendering, with berxwedan explicitly recorded as a rejected alternative, exactly parallel to how baseline handles rizgarî/azadî.
• φιλαδελφία (philadelphia, “brotherly affection”) — v.7. New term. Literal: “love of brothers.” Kurdish rendering risk: Medium-High. Proposed: “Hezkirina Biran” (love of brothers) rather than bare “Biratî” (brotherhood), since Kurdish tribal (aşîret) kinship structures — already flagged in baseline regarding adoption and covenant — could cause bare “brotherhood” language to be read as blood/tribal kinship rather than the spiritual family bond among believers regardless of lineage.
• ἀγάπη (agapē, “love”) — v.7. New term (not in baseline TM, though used throughout Romans). Proposed: “Evîn” (love), the standard Kurdish word. Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. As baseline already notes for “father” and “glory,” Kurdish classical Sufi poetry (Melayê Cizîrî, Ehmedê Xanî) cultivates an intimate, often erotically-charged lover/beloved (aşiq-maşuq) register around “evîn,” describing the soul’s romantic-mystical union with the Divine. Agapē here is committed, willed, others-directed love within the believing community — the ethical climax of the virtue list — and must be calibrated in register so as not to import the Sufi mystical-romantic frame into this practical, communal context.
• κλῆσις καὶ ἐκλογή (klēsis kai eklogē, “calling and election”) — v.10, “make your calling and election sure.” Reuses baseline calling → Vexwendin and election → Hilbijartin exactly, inheriting their documented risk notes (democratic-election collision for hilbijartin).
• αἰώνιον βασιλείαν (aiōnion basileian, “eternal kingdom”) — v.11, “the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” Reuses baseline kingdom_of_god → Padîşahiya Xwedê, here explicitly qualified “eternal” and tied to the Savior title (σωτήρ, see above) — reinforcing that this kingdom is Christ’s own eternal reign, not a this-worldly political entity, directly relevant to the baseline’s Critical flag on kingdom_of_god and Kurdish statehood aspirations.
• σκήνωμα (skēnōma, “tent, tabernacle” — body metaphor) — vv.13-14, “as long as I am in this tent… I must soon put off my tabernacle.” New, low risk: “kon/xême” (tent) as a body-metaphor; standard figurative usage, minor note only.

Chapter 2

Chapter 2 is the primary textual home of the “False Teachers and Their Judgment” doctrine and introduces substantial new vocabulary.

• ψευδοπροφῆται / ψευδοδιδάσκαλοι (pseudoprophētai / pseudodidaskaloi, “false prophets / false teachers”) — v.1. New terms, built on baseline prophet → Pêxember. Proposed: “Pêxemberê Derewîn” / “Mamosteyê Derewîn.” Kurdish rendering risk: High. Must be carefully scoped in teaching material as an intra-church polemic (v.1, “false teachers will arise among you,” i.e., within the believing community) rather than an adjudication of Muhammad’s prophetic status or any claim about Islam’s prophets generally — an unintended but predictable misreading given the region’s deep sensitivity around prophetic legitimacy and the doctrine of khatam al-anbiya (finality of prophethood).
• αἱρέσεις ἀπωλείας (haireseis apōleias, “destructive heresies/sects”) — v.1. New term. αἵρεσις literally “a choosing, a school of thought/faction” (root of English “heresy”). Kurdish rendering risk: Medium-High. Proposed: “baweriyên şaş ên wêrankar” (destructive false beliefs).
• δεσπότην (despotēn, “Master/Sovereign Owner”) — v.1, “denying the Master who bought them.” New term, distinct from κύριος (baseline lord → Xudan). Literal: “master of the household, absolute owner.” Kurdish rendering risk: High. Proposed: “Serwer” (sovereign master) rather than reusing Xudan (to preserve the distinct Greek term) and rather than “Xwedan” (owner), whose shared root with Xwedê (God) risks confusing readers about which divine Person is meant. Must retain the force of Christ’s ownership by purchase (ἀγοράσαντα, “bought/redeemed”) — an atonement claim over even those who later apostatize — not softened to a generic “leader” or “teacher.”
• ἀπώλεια (apōleia, “destruction, perdition, ruin”) — vv.1, 3; also 3:7, 16. New term, central to “The Day of the Lord and Final Judgment.” Proposed: “Helakbûn” (perishing/destruction). Kurdish rendering risk: High. Must communicate genuine, severe, final divine judgment; translators should flag ambiguity for theologian review rather than importing a specific resolution (annihilation vs. ongoing conscious ruin) not settled by the term alone.
• ταρταρόω (tartaroō, “cast into Tartarus”) — v.4, of the angels who sinned. A NT hapax legomenon, borrowed from the Greek mythological underworld-name Tartarus. Kurdish rendering risk: CRITICAL. Proposed: “avêtin Dojehê” (cast into Dojeh), using “Dojeh” — the native, Old Iranian-root Kurdish/Persian word for hell — rather than “Cehenem,” the Arabic Quranic loanword. This mirrors exactly the reasoning already established in baseline for preferring native Xwedê over Allah: Cehenem carries the full weight of specific Quranic afterlife geography and theology (multiple levels of hell, specific classes of sinners, debates over intercession and duration for professing Muslims) that would import an entire foreign doctrinal apparatus into this verse about fallen angels, which the term itself does not intend.
• κατακλυσμός (kataklysmos, “flood, deluge”) — v.5, of Noah. New term. Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. Proposed: “tofan” (the widely used Kurdish/regional loanword for a great flood, cognate with the Quran’s account of Noah in Surah Nūḥ/71). This is a genuine positive shared-story asset, but the specific Petrine typology — the flood as a past pattern of judgment prefiguring the future judgment by fire (ch. 3) — is distinctly Christian and must be taught explicitly, not assumed already present in the shared story.
• Σόδομα καὶ Γόμορρα (Sodoma kai Gomorra) — v.6. Standard proper names; shared positively with the Quran’s account of Lot’s people (Surah Hūd, Al-Aʿrāf). Medium risk; same “teach the typology explicitly” note as the flood.
• ὁδὸς τῆς ἀληθείας / ὁδὸν τοῦ Βαλαάμ / εὐθεῖα ὁδός (“the way of truth” v.2 / “the way of Balaam” v.15 / “the straight way” v.15) — New term-family built on ὁδός (“way, road, path”). Kurdish rendering risk: High. Proposed: “Rê” (way/path); “Riya Rast” (the straight/right way). HIGH RISK: this vocabulary directly overlaps with two live regional concepts — (1) the Islamic aş-şirāṭ al-mustaqīm (“the Straight Path”), recited by every practicing Muslim in the Fatiha at each of the five daily prayers, and (2) the Sufi ṭarīqa (“the Way”), denoting a specific mystical order under a living pîr’s guidance (see baseline’s saints/pîr note). 2 Peter’s “way of truth” and “right way” must be explicitly anchored to the apostolic gospel and to Christ himself, not left available to be filled in by either existing framework.
• ἐλευθερίαν ἐπαγγελλόμενοι (eleutherian epangellomenoi, “promising them liberty”) — v.19. Reuses the concept-companion of baseline salvation/rizgarî: ἐλευθερία → Azadî (freedom), the exact companion term baseline already names as saturated with Kurdish nationalist-liberation meaning. Kurdish rendering risk: CRITICAL. This is one of the most delicate single phrases in the whole curriculum: false teachers “promise them azadî while they themselves are slaves of corruption.” Because azadî is a revered, emotionally central word in the (sympathetic, real, ongoing) Kurdish freedom movement, this verse risks sounding — if not carefully anchored — like an attack on that movement itself. It must be taught as being exclusively about personal moral/spiritual bondage to sin masquerading as liberty, with an explicit statement that the text has no bearing whatsoever on political freedom aspirations.
• μιάσματα (miasmata, “pollutions, defilements”) — v.20. New term. Kurdish rendering risk: Medium-High. Proposed: “Qirêjî” (filth/defilement). Risk of being heard as ritual/ceremonial impurity (parallel to Islamic najāsa, requiring specific ritual purification) rather than the moral corruption of worldly sin 2 Peter intends — the same caution baseline already records for sanctification/Pakkirin.
• κύων … ὗς (“dog… sow,” proverbial images, v.22) — low risk; standard proverbial imagery of reversion to a former corrupt state, recognizable cross-culturally.

Chapter 3

Chapter 3 anchors “The Certainty of Christ’s Return,” “The Day of the Lord and Final Judgment,” and “Patience of God’s Timing.”

• ἐμπαῖκται (empaiktai, “scoffers, mockers”) — v.3. New term. Proposed: “Tinazkar” (mockers). Medium risk; standard.
• παρουσία (parousia) — v.4, “Where is the promise of his coming?” Reuses the analysis under 1:16 above; here the scoffers’ direct challenge to the doctrine of Christ’s return. Same CRITICAL risk profile as noted in the core passage, including the Islamic-eschatology Isa-return collision.
• τεθησαυρισμένοι εἰσὶν πυρί (“stored up/reserved for fire”) — v.7. New but low-medium risk phrase describing the present heavens and earth as reserved for the coming fire-judgment, paralleling the flood-judgment typology of ch. 2.
• ἡμέρα κρίσεως καὶ ἀπωλείας τῶν ἀσεβῶν ἀνθρώπων (“day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men”) — v.7. Combines ἀπώλεια (see ch.2 above) with a new phrase “day of judgment,” closely related to the next entry.
• ἡμέρα κυρίου (hēmera kyriou, “Day of the Lord”) — v.10. New term, central to “The Day of the Lord and Final Judgment.” Reuses baseline lord → Xudan. Proposed: “Roja Xudan.” Kurdish rendering risk: CRITICAL, paired directly with the parousia entry above. Note a genuine positive point of contact: mainstream Islamic eschatology has its own robust doctrine of a final Day of Judgment (Yawm ad-Dīn/Yawm al-Qiyāma), which can be a bridge for teaching the reality and seriousness of final judgment — but this term must be anchored specifically to Christ’s own personal, visible return as the divine Judge, not left as a generic “day of Allah’s judgment” compatible with either framework without distinction.
• βραδύνει … μακροθυμεῖ (bradynei … makrothymei, “is slow… is patient/longsuffering”) — v.9. μακροθυμία (makrothymia, “patience, longsuffering, forbearance”) is the anchor term of “Patience of God’s Timing,” also at v.15. Literal: “long-tempered” (makros, “long” + thymos, “temper/passion”). Kurdish rendering risk: HIGH. The most readily available Kurdish word, “Sebir” (the Arabic-loan term used across the region), is one of the most heavily weighted virtue-terms in Islamic ethics — patient endurance under hardship/trial, a core value in both mainstream Sunni piety and Sufi spiritual formation. Using sebir risks 2 Peter’s very specific point — that God is deliberately delaying judgment in order to give space for repentance — being flattened into a generic praise of patient endurance as a virtue in itself. Recommend the native compound “Bîhnfirehî” (literally “broad-breathedness,” i.e., forbearance) as the primary rendering, preserving the specific sense of God’s purposeful withholding of judgment, with “sebir” recorded as a rejected alternative for this specific theological sense (though sebir remains appropriate for ordinary human patience elsewhere).
• μετάνοια (metanoia, “repentance,” literally “a change of mind”) — v.9. New term. Kurdish rendering risk: High. Proposed: “Poşmanî” (native Kurdish for regret/repentance) as the primary rendering, with awareness that “Tobe” (the Arabic loanword tawba) is in wide common use. Islamic tawba is understood as a structured process (ceasing the sin, feeling regret, resolving not to repeat, sometimes restitution), whereas biblical metanoia is a Spirit-enabled reorientation of the whole person toward God specifically through Christ — this distinction should be taught explicitly, parallel to how baseline distinguishes obedience_of_faith from Islamic submission.
• ἡμέρα κυρίου ὡς κλέπτης (“Day of the Lord as a thief,” v.10) — κλέπτης (kleptēs, “thief”) new, low risk; the point is suddenness/unpredictability of timing, not injustice.
• στοιχεῖα (stoicheia, “elements,” vv.10,12) — New term, “basic components” of the physical cosmos. Low-Medium risk; primarily cosmological, no major regional collision requiring flag.
• καινοὺς οὐρανοὺς καὶ γῆν καινήν (“new heavens and a new earth,” v.13) — New term, anchor image for future hope. Kurdish rendering risk: Medium. Proposed: “Ezmanên Nû û Erdê Nû.” Must be distinguished from a separate, otherworldly Islamic Paradise/Jannah (garden) concept: Peter’s hope is the renewal of THIS created cosmos, in which righteousness (baseline righteousness → Adalet) dwells — a distinct vision from a separate garden-paradise, worth clarifying rather than assuming equivalence.
• ἐν ᾗ δικαιοσύνη κατοικεῖ (“in which righteousness dwells,” v.13) — reuses baseline righteousness → Adalet exactly; note the personification of righteousness as an inhabitant of the renewed cosmos.
• ἄσπιλοι καὶ ἀμώμητοι (“without spot and blameless,” v.14) — New, low-medium risk moral-purity imagery; consistent with baseline sanctification caution (avoid a purely ritual-purity reading).
• μακροθυμίαν σωτηρίαν ἡγεῖσθε (“regard the patience of our Lord as salvation,” v.15) — combines μακροθυμία (see above) with baseline salvation → Rizgarî, inheriting Rizgarî’s own Critical risk profile; the phrase must be anchored so “our Lord’s patience IS itself salvation” is read as personal, spiritual opportunity for repentance, not folded into any political-liberation register.
• δυσνόητά … στρεβλοῦσιν (“hard to understand… twist/distort,” v.16, of Paul’s letters) — New, low-medium risk; supports the “Reliability and Inspiration of Scripture” doctrine by placing Paul’s letters alongside “the other Scriptures” (v.16), an important early canon-consciousness statement.
• στηριγμοῦ (stērigmou, “steadfastness, firm standing,” v.17) — New, low-medium risk: “Xurtbûn” (firmness/steadfastness).
• αὐξάνετε ἐν χάριτι καὶ γνώσει (“grow in grace and knowledge,” v.18, the book’s closing exhortation) — Reuses baseline grace → Kerem and the ch.1 γνῶσις/ἐπίγνωσις → Nasîn/Zanîn entries, bringing the letter’s two central themes (grace and true knowledge of Christ, against the false teachers’ corrupted alternative) to its climactic close.

---

Cross-Cutting Risk Clusters (Summary Observations for Phase 1 Step 2 onward)

1. Political-vocabulary cluster (Critical): Rizgarî (salvation) / Rizgarker (Savior) / Azadî (liberty) / Berxwedan-vs-Domdarî (endurance) all sit inside the same semantic field as Kurdish nationalist-liberation discourse. Every occurrence across 2 Peter needs explicit personal/spiritual anchoring language, and Berxwedan should generally be avoided in favor of Domdarî for the specific virtue of hypomonē.
2. Mystical-absorption cluster (Critical): Theia physis (divine nature), son_of_god, incarnation-adjacent transfiguration language, and epignōsis/gnōsis (via Sufi ma’rifa) all carry the inverted risk — documented in baseline for Sonship/Incarnation — of being too readily assimilated into Sufi wahdat al-wujud or Yazidi divine-manifestation frameworks rather than resisted outright.
3. Islamic-legal/interpretive-authority cluster (High): “Private interpretation” (1:20), “the way/straight way” (2:2,15), and false prophet/teacher language (2:1) each brush against structurally similar Islamic categories (tafsir authority, sirat al-mustaqim/tariqa, khatam al-anbiya) that could silently supply the missing content if not explicitly taught against.
4. Islamic eschatology cluster (Critical): Parousia and Day of the Lord (chs. 1, 3) collide with the specific, popularly-known hadith doctrine of Isa’s own future return — a genuine and specific competing narrative, not a generic difference of belief, requiring explicit differentiation at every occurrence.
5. Virtue/piety vocabulary cluster (High): Aretē (virtue), eusebeia (godliness, treated in the glossary below), makrothymia (patience), and metanoia (repentance) each have strong, positively-regarded Islamic ethical/devotional cognates (fadila/fazilet, taqwa, sabr, tawba) that risk flattening 2 Peter’s specific, grace-grounded, Christ-centered senses into generic shared piety vocabulary.

---

This document feeds directly into analysis/08_core_glossary.md. All new terms proposed here require Phase 1 Step 8 confirmation and formal entry into translation_memory.json before Phase 2 processing begins.