Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis
This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.
Risk tier summary
| Tier | Count | Review routing | Example doctrines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 8 | Human theologian, every occurrence | Salvation, Incarnation, Grace, Deity of Christ, Sonship of Christ, Resurrection of Christ, Lordship of Christ, Messianic Promise |
| High | 20 | Human theologian | Gospel, Divine Calling, Faith, Sanctification, Providence, Universal Scope of the Gospel, Unity of Jews and Gentiles |
| Medium | 9 | Native speaker review | Apostleship, Prayer and Intercession, Spiritual Gifts, Mission to the Nations, Evangelism, Church as God’s People, Kingdom Mission |
| Low | 3 | Automated review only | Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship |
Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do
Bodo’s eight Critical-risk doctrines split into two distinct failure modes rather than one. Incarnation, Resurrection, Lordship, Sonship, and Deity of Christ are Critical because a fluent-sounding rendering could accidentally borrow structure from the Kherai puja’s doudini trance-possession (for incarnation and Spirit language) or from Brahma Dharma’s imported rebirth vocabulary (for resurrection). Salvation and Grace are Critical for a different reason: they name concepts with no ready native scaffold in Bathou tradition at all, so getting them wrong means leaving the concept untaught rather than mistranslating an existing one. Messianic Promise is Critical because it must not be folded into the populated Bathou/Kherai pantheon as one more recognized divine figure.
Review routing rationale
Critical and High risk doctrines (28 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Bodo is fluent without catching that it either imports possession/rebirth framing or silently skips teaching a concept that has no existing native starting point. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is cultural fit (e.g. colonial-mission associations, contemporary ethnic-territorial sensitivities) rather than doctrinal contradiction or conceptual absence.