Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Welcome to the Library

What is this?

The Library publishes the doctrine-aware translation research behind tri-bible.ai, one language and book at a time — free to read and reuse.

How to navigate

Pick a language, then a book, in the sidebar. Each book has a Doctrine Analysis, a Core Glossary, and, for the language as a whole, a Comparative Theology and Regional Analysis. Use the search icon in the top nav to jump straight to a term or doctrine instead of browsing.

What the risk tiers mean

Every doctrine and glossary term is labeled with how easily it could be misread or mistranslated in that language's own cultural and religious context:

Critical
A wrong word choice here risks distorting core theology — always reviewed by a theologian before use.
High
A real, well-documented risk of confusion with another tradition or belief system — needs theologian review.
Medium
Worth a native speaker's second look, but not likely to distort the core meaning.
Low
Minor wording nuance — low risk of confusion either way.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Executive Summary

Executive Summary: Matthew — Greek Destination Language

Why it matters

Modern Greek is the direct, unbroken descendant of Matthew’s own Koine Greek — a translation-pair situation unique in this pipeline. For most of Matthew’s vocabulary there is no cross-linguistic gap at all: the modern word simply is the New Testament’s word. That advantage is also this curriculum’s central hazard. Two millennia of semantic drift in a single language — not translation into a foreign one — have pulled load-bearing terms in two directions: secular bleaching (μακάριος → “the deceased”; παρουσία → classroom “attendance”; μαθητής → “schoolchild”; κόλαση → traffic-jam hyperbole) and patristic/liturgical accretion (μυστήριο → “the Sacraments”; προσκυνώ → icon veneration; μετάνοια → the rite of Confession). Matthew intensifies this risk profile beyond Romans/Galatians and adds a new category: denominational-referent sensitivity, where the wording is stable but the doctrine’s referent (Matthew 16:18-19’s “rock” and “keys”) sits at the center of a live, centuries-old inter-tradition dispute.

Key findings

  • All 28 chapters of Matthew reviewed; no chapter was found to contribute zero load-bearing vocabulary. Density peaks in chs. 5-7 (Sermon on the Mount, containing the core passage), 13 (Kingdom parables), 16-18 (church-founding texts), and 24-28 (Passion, Resurrection, Commission).
  • 118 tracked terms in the Matthew-extended bible_term_registry.json: 33 Critical and 41 High risk (74 total, 63% of all tracked terms) require mandatory human theologian review on every occurrence.
  • 35 doctrines mapped in doctrine_risk_registry.json: 21 Critical and 10 High (31 of 35, 89%) route to human theologian review; only 4 route to native speaker review and zero are automated-only — a materially higher review burden than the Romans/Galatians baseline.
  • The core passage (Matthew 5:1-12, the Beatitudes) contains the single highest-risk lexical item in the entire curriculum: μακάριος/μακάριοι, whose dominant Modern Greek sense is “the late/deceased” (ο μακαρίτης) — a near-total sense-substitution risk at the exact text the whole curriculum is anchored to.
  • A documented sectarian translation (the Greek New World Translation) circulates widely enough in Greece/Cyprus to require an explicit negative-check list: six specific departures (παρουσία as “presence”; two-class kingdom membership; annihilationist judgment; subordinationist Trinity framing at 28:19; tetragrammaton-insertion for Κύριος; “happy” for μακάριοι) must never be echoed.

Risks

  • Beatitudes collapse (5:3-11): μακάριος’s dominant “deceased”/“blissfully oblivious” senses can invert the passage’s entire rhetorical force at the curriculum’s theological anchor.
  • Kingdom flattening (throughout, ~32×): βασιλεία των ουρανών risks collapsing into a purely future, post-mortem “heaven” destination, erasing Matthew’s present-and-future tension.
  • Sacramental collision (13:11): μυστήρια της βασιλείας risks being heard as “the Sacraments” or a whodunit “mystery,” fully displacing Jesus’ actual point.
  • Parousia trivialization (24:3,27,37,39): the Second Coming’s technical term is dominated in everyday Greek by ordinary classroom “attendance-taking” — the single most severe secular-bleaching trap in the pipeline to date.
  • Denominational adjudication risk (16:16-19): the transparent Πέτρος/πέτρα wordplay is a genuine asset, but careless framing could be read as taking a side in the historic Catholic/Orthodox papal-primacy dispute.
  • Judgment trivialization/oversteering (25:46): κόλαση αιώνια is colloquially bleached toward hyperbole on one side and risks annihilationist reinterpretation (a documented sectarian departure) on the other.
  • Discipleship flattening (throughout; climactic at 28:19): μαθητής/μαθητεύσατε’s ordinary “schoolchild”/“enroll” sense risks reducing total-life apprenticeship to classroom enrollment at the Great Commission’s climactic verb.

Opportunities

  • Zero-gap LXX access: a Greek reader can read Matthew’s Old Testament citations (Isaiah 7:14 at 1:23; Psalm 118:22 at 21:42; Psalm 118:25-26 at 21:9) in the same language Matthew quotes them in — a genuine interpretive asset unavailable to any other Language Package in this pipeline.
  • Liturgical verbatim assets: the Beatitudes (Third Antiphon), the Lord’s Prayer, the Words of Institution (26:26-28), and the Trinitarian baptismal formula (28:19) are already memorized/chanted verbatim by most Orthodox Greek readers — reuse this wording exactly rather than modernizing it.
  • Native ἀγάπη/ἔρωτας/φιλία distinction: Greek’s own vocabulary for love supports the greatest-commandment teaching (22:37-39) with a precision most target languages lack.
  • Transparent Πέτρος/πέτρα wordplay: an asset unavailable to most languages, usable to teach Matthew 16:18 vividly once the denominational-referent caution is honored.
  • Ανάσταση as living feast: Greek Orthodox Easter already centers resurrection; the curriculum’s task is doctrinal precision, not persuasion.
  1. Load the Matthew-extended translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, and doctrine_risk_registry.json — together with the unchanged Romans/Galatians baseline — before any Phase 2 segment processing.
  2. Route all 74 Critical/High terms and all 31 Critical/High doctrines to mandatory human theologian review per the escalation rules in 12_ai_translation_requirements.md; native speaker review remains sufficient only for the 4 Medium-tier doctrines (greatest commandment, woes against hypocrisy, Gentile inclusion/mission, Sabbath authority).
  3. Apply the mandatory explanatory-note requirement at every occurrence of μακάριος, βασιλεία των ουρανών, μυστήρια της βασιλείας, παρουσία, and κόλαση αιώνια — these five terms alone account for the highest-severity risk cluster in the curriculum.
  4. Run every Matthew segment touching 24:3-44, 25:46, and 28:19 against the six-point New World Translation negative-check list before approval.
  5. Hold Matthew 16:16-19 to a strict interpretation-neutral standard: present Christ’s authority to found his church on apostolic confession without adjudicating the Catholic/Orthodox papal-primacy dispute.
  6. Reuse established Greek liturgical wording verbatim (no stylistic modernization) at the Beatitudes, the Lord’s Prayer, the Words of Institution, and the baptismal formula, per 05_translation_landscape.md.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words