Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference and Theme Analysis: Luke 1–24

Method and Citation Conventions

This document catalogs every Old Testament quotation and every significant OT allusion in the Gospel of Luke, chapter by chapter, together with messianic references, typological patterns, and cross-curriculum parallels to the Romans Language Package already established for Russian. Coverage spans the entire book; chapters with no direct OT citation are explicitly noted as reviewed rather than silently omitted.

Citation format: All Scripture references are normalized as Book Chapter:Verse (e.g., “Genesis 15:6”, “Isaiah 61:1-2”, “Luke 4:18-19”) — no abbreviations, matching the requirement for machine-normalizable citation strings. This is distinct from the Bible-reading-format citation convention (Рим. 3:23, Лк. 4:18) established in the baseline 12_ai_translation_requirements.md for reader-facing Scripture citations; that reader-facing convention still applies to all destination-language output text produced in Phase 2.

Translation sensitivity ratings use the same tier vocabulary as doctrine_risk_registry.json (Critical / High / Medium / Low), applied here specifically to the risk that a cross-reference’s Russian rendering could obscure, distort, or fail to surface the OT-NT link for the reader — a distinct but related risk axis to the term-level risk already logged in Steps 7-8.


PART 1 — Direct Old Testament Quotations in Luke, by Chapter

Luke PassageOT SourceThemeRelated Character(s)Translation Sensitivity
Luke 2:23-24Exodus 13:2,12; Leviticus 12:8Consecration of the firstborn; the Holy Family’s poverty (turtledoves = the poor person’s offering)Jesus, Mary, JosephMedium — Leviticus 12:8’s provision for those who cannot afford a lamb directly identifies the Holy Family as economically poor; this quiet legal detail is easy to translate literally while missing its load-bearing connection to the “Good News to the Poor” doctrine. Teaching text should make the economic marker explicit.
Luke 3:4-6Isaiah 40:3-5The voice preparing the way; universal scope (“all flesh shall see”)John the BaptistMedium — Isaiah 40:5’s “all flesh” (πᾶσα σάρξ) is a universal-scope marker parallel to Romans’ universality claims (Romans 3:23; 10:12-13); render with the same unqualified inclusiveness the baseline mandates for universal terms — no softening.
Luke 4:4Deuteronomy 8:3Dependence on God over bread aloneJesus (temptation)Low — well-established Synodal wording; ties to “Prayer and Dependence on God” doctrine.
Luke 4:8Deuteronomy 6:13Exclusive worship of GodJesus (temptation), the devilLow.
Luke 4:10-11Psalm 91:11-12Misapplied/misquoted Scripture by the devilThe devilMedium — translators must preserve that this is the devil’s misuse of a true text (out of context, omitting its implicit trust-not-presumption framing); teaching text should flag this as a model of Scripture twisted by isolating it from its own context, relevant given post-Soviet folk-superstitious use of isolated “protective” verses.
Luke 4:12Deuteronomy 6:16Not testing GodJesus (temptation)Low.
Luke 4:18-19Isaiah 61:1-2 (with Isaiah 58:6 phrase “let the oppressed go free” interwoven)Spirit-anointed messianic mission; good news to the poor; Jubilee releaseJesus, IsaiahCRITICAL — the core passage. See full term-level treatment in 07_semantic_analysis.md. Cross-reference note: this is Luke’s single most important OT quotation in the entire Gospel and must be flagged for theologian review as a unit, not just at the term level (помазал, нищим, лето Господне благоприятное).
Luke 7:27Malachi 3:1The messenger who prepares the Lord’s wayJohn the BaptistMedium — identifies John’s role via a directly messianic OT text; ensure “Господень” possessive force is not lost in favor of a generic “God’s messenger” paraphrase.
Luke 10:27Deuteronomy 6:5; Leviticus 19:18The great love command (love of God, love of neighbor)The lawyer, JesusHIGH — this combined double-citation is the direct springboard into the Good Samaritan parable and Luke’s neighbor-love doctrine; see Part 4 rendering-consistency rules (parallel to Romans 13:9).
Luke 13:35Psalm 118:26”Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord” — Jerusalem’s coming recognition of JesusJesus, JerusalemMedium; recurs at Luke 19:38 (see below) — ensure identical Russian rendering both times per the consistency rule in Part 4.
Luke 18:20Exodus 20:12-16 / Deuteronomy 5:16-20The Ten Commandments cited to the rich rulerJesus, the rich rulerLow-Medium — standard Decalogue wording; ties to the rich/poor doctrine strand (the ruler’s inability to part with wealth, contrasted with the commandments he can recite but not fully keep).
Luke 19:38Psalm 118:26Triumphal Entry acclamationThe crowd, JesusMedium — see Luke 13:35 above; also intersects the “king” (царь) Medium-risk term already logged in Step 8.
Luke 19:46Isaiah 56:7; Jeremiah 7:11”House of prayer” vs. “den of robbers” — Temple cleansingJesus, Temple merchantsMedium — Isaiah 56:7’s own context (the preceding verses promise Gentiles and outcasts full worship access) directly reinforces “Savior for All Nations”; teaching text should note this connection rather than treat the citation as merely about commerce in the Temple.
Luke 20:17Psalm 118:22The rejected stone become the cornerstoneJesus, the religious leadersHIGH — messianic rejection-and-vindication typology; see Part 3 typology section and Part 4 Romans-parallel note (thematic, not verbal, parallel to Romans 9:33’s citation of Isaiah 28:16/8:14).
Luke 20:28Deuteronomy 25:5-6Levirate marriage law (Sadducees’ resurrection test-case)The Sadducees, JesusLow.
Luke 20:37Exodus 3:6”God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob” — argument for the resurrection from the burning bush narrativeJesus, Moses, the patriarchsMedium — see Part 4 for the thematic (not verbal) parallel to Romans 4:17’s “God who gives life to the dead.”
Luke 20:42-43Psalm 110:1”The Lord said to my Lord… sit at my right hand”Jesus, DavidCRITICAL — direct messianic/Lordship text; recurs at Luke 22:69. See Part 4 rendering-consistency rule (Господь must be rendered identically here and in every Romans occurrence of κύριος tied to this same Psalm’s conceptual background, notably Romans 8:34).
Luke 22:37Isaiah 53:12”Numbered with the transgressors” — the Suffering Servant applied to Jesus’ arrestJesus, Isaiah’s ServantHIGH — see Part 3 (Suffering Servant typology) and Part 4 (parallel to Romans 10:16’s citation of Isaiah 53:1).
Luke 22:69Psalm 110:1Repeated right-hand enthronement claim before the SanhedrinJesusCRITICAL — same rendering-consistency rule as Luke 20:42-43.
Luke 23:30Hosea 10:8”Fall on us” — judgment lamentThe crowds, Jesus (prophesying)Medium.
Luke 23:46Psalm 31:5”Into your hands I commit my spirit” — Jesus’ final word from the crossJesusHIGH — a dying prayer of complete trust; ties directly to “Prayer and Dependence on God” doctrine at its most extreme test case; render with the same intimate Отец address already established for this doctrine (Step 8).

PART 2 — Old Testament Allusions and Typological Echoes (Non-Quotation), by Chapter

Luke PassageOT Allusion/EchoThemeRelated Character(s)Translation Sensitivity
Luke 1:46-55 (Magnificat)1 Samuel 2:1-10 (Hannah’s Song); Psalm 103; Micah 7:20God’s reversal of the proud and humble; covenant faithfulnessMary, HannahHIGH — the Magnificat is Luke’s earliest programmatic statement of the “great reversal” theme (rich/poor, proud/humble) that structures the whole Gospel and anticipates the core passage; a paraphrase-only rendering that loses its OT poetic parallelism risks flattening this founding text.
Luke 1:68-79 (Benedictus)Malachi 3:1; Malachi 4:5-6; Isaiah 9:2; Psalm 106:10Covenant fulfillment; a new Elijah-forerunner; light in darknessZechariah, Elijah (typologically, of John)Medium.
Luke 2:32Isaiah 42:6; Isaiah 49:6”A light for revelation to the Gentiles… glory to Israel” — Simeon’s Nunc DimittisSimeon, JesusHIGH — directly load-bearing for “Savior for All Nations”; Isaiah’s Servant-as-light-to-nations background must not be lost behind the phrase’s heavy liturgical familiarity (Nunc Dimittis is a fixed Orthodox Vespers text).
Luke 3:23-38 (genealogy)Genesis 1-5 (Adam); 1 Chronicles 1-3; Ruth 4Jesus’ full humanity traced to Adam, “son of God”Adam, David, AbrahamMedium — see Part 3, Adam typology; flag the distinct sense of “son of God” here from Christ’s unique eternal Sonship (already logged Step 7-8).
Luke 4:25-271 Kings 17:1,9 (Elijah and the widow of Zarephath); 2 Kings 5:1-14 (Elisha and Naaman the Syrian)God’s saving mercy reaching Gentile outsiders even when Israel rejected the prophetsElijah, Elisha, JesusCRITICAL — Jesus cites these two Gentile-mercy narratives immediately after his Nazareth sermon, and it is this, not the sermon’s positive content, that provokes the crowd’s murderous rage (4:28-29). This is the Gospel’s earliest and sharpest statement of “Savior for All Nations” and must be translated with full force — a softened rendering would erase the reason for the violent reaction that follows.
Luke 6:3-41 Samuel 21:1-6David eating the consecrated bread — precedent for Sabbath mercy over ritualDavid, JesusMedium — ties Sabbath-lordship claim (6:5) to Davidic-messianic authority.
Luke 9:28-36 (Transfiguration)Exodus 24:15-18; Exodus 34:29-35 (Moses, cloud, glory, shining face)New-Moses/new-Exodus typology; divine glory disclosedMoses, Elijah, JesusMedium, per baseline’s deity_of_christ/glory entries; ensure слава retains full theological weight here (cf. Step 7 note on liturgical over-familiarity).
Luke 9:35Deuteronomy 18:15”This is my Son… listen to him” — the prophet like MosesMoses, JesusHIGH — see Part 3, Moses typology.
Luke 10:15Isaiah 14:13-15Capernaum’s proud self-exaltation and coming humiliation (echoing the King of Babylon oracle)Jesus, CapernaumLow-Medium.
Luke 10:28(echoes Leviticus 18:5)“Do this, and you will live”The lawyer, JesusHIGH — see Part 4 rendering-consistency rule; this is the same OT legal formula Paul cites in Romans 10:5, and the two passages must be taught in coordinated tension (law-doing vs. faith) rather than in isolation.
Luke 11:29-32Jonah 1-3; 1 Kings 10:1-10 (Queen of Sheba)“Sign of Jonah”; Gentile recognition exceeding Israel’sJonah, the Queen of the South, JesusHIGH — reinforces “Savior for All Nations” via explicit Gentile-superior-response typology; see Part 3, Jonah typology.
Luke 11:49-51Genesis 4:8-10 (Abel); 2 Chronicles 24:20-22 (Zechariah son of Berechiah)The full span of Israel’s prophet-rejecting history, from the first to the last martyr in the Hebrew canon’s own internal orderingAbel, Zechariah, JesusMedium — requires an explanatory note for readers with low continuous-OT-narrative literacy (per baseline’s inspiration_of_scripture doctrine note on liturgical-excerpt-only exposure); “from Genesis to Chronicles” is a canon-spanning idiom that will not land without explanation.
Luke 12:53Micah 7:6Household division as a sign of the age’s upheavalFamily members (generic)Low.
Luke 13:18-19Ezekiel 17:23; Daniel 4:10-12,20-21The mustard seed becoming a great tree sheltering birds — small hidden beginnings, large future scopeJesusMedium — directly load-bearing for “Kingdom of God Present and Future.”
Luke 14:15-24Isaiah 25:6The eschatological banquet for all peoplesJesus (parable)HIGH — reinforces both “Savior for All Nations” and “Table Fellowship” doctrines; the invitation extended to “the poor, crippled, blind, and lame” (14:21) directly echoes and fulfills the core passage’s own catalogue (4:18).
Luke 15:11-32Exodus 34:6-7 (God’s compassion and steadfast love); broader Hosea return-of-the-wayward-people motifThe father’s compassionate, running welcomeThe father, the prodigal sonHIGH — this parable’s climax is Luke’s most vivid narrative embodiment of grace (благодать) and full restoration (усыновление); both baseline Critical-risk terms converge here even though neither Greek word occurs in the text itself.
Luke 17:26-27Genesis 6-8 (Noah and the Flood)Unpreparedness before sudden judgmentNoahLow.
Luke 17:28-32Genesis 19 (Lot, Sodom)Same theme, intensified; “remember Lot’s wife”LotLow-Medium.
Luke 18:13Psalm 51:1 (echo, not direct quotation)“God, be merciful to me, a sinner” — the tax collector’s penitential cryThe tax collectorHIGH — this is the Gospel’s clearest verbal echo of the great penitential Psalm, directly reinforcing “Repentance and Forgiveness of Sins”; see Part 4 for its thematic parallel to Romans’ grace-apart-from-works argument.
Luke 21:27Daniel 7:13-14The Son of Man coming with the clouds of heaven, receiving dominionJesus, “the Son of Man” figure of DanielHIGH — see Part 3, Son of Man typology (already logged Step 7-8 at the term level; this entry logs the specific OT citation underlying the whole title).
Luke 22:14-20Exodus 12 (Passover); Exodus 24:8 (covenant blood); Jeremiah 31:31-34 (new covenant promise)The Last Supper as new Passover and new-covenant inaugurationJesus, Moses, JeremiahCRITICAL — combines three major OT streams (Passover deliverance, Sinai covenant ratification by blood, Jeremiah’s explicit “new covenant” prophecy) in a single scene; see Part 4 for the direct link to Romans’ covenant vocabulary and the book-title collision risk already logged for “Новый Завет” in Step 8.
Luke 23:34Psalm 22:18 (echoed; made explicit in the parallel Gospel accounts)Casting lots for Jesus’ garmentsThe soldiersLow-Medium — Luke’s own text does not narrate the detail as explicitly as John 19:24, but the scene is universally read against this Psalm; a footnote cross-reference is useful rather than a translation risk per se.
Luke 23:41,47Isaiah 53:9 (echo — “he had done no violence”)Jesus’ innocence declared by the criminal and the centurionThe penitent criminal, the centurionMedium.
Luke 24:46Hosea 6:2 (typological, not a direct verbal quotation); Isaiah 53 (Suffering Servant, broadly)“Raised on the third day,” suffering-then-glory patternJesusMedium, consistent with baseline’s resurrection_of_christ entry.
Luke 24:44-47Programmatic reference to “Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms” (the full Hebrew canon in its threefold structure)Christ as the fulfillment and interpretive key to the entire OTJesusCRITICAL — this closing statement is the direct bookend of the core passage’s own opening fulfillment claim (4:21) and should be taught as a matching pair; see Part 4.
Luke 24:49Joel 2:28-32 (allusion, fulfilled explicitly by direct quotation in Acts 2:16-21)The promised outpouring of the SpiritJesus, the disciplesHIGH — forms a direct narrative bridge from Luke’s Gospel into Acts (Luke’s own sequel volume); see Part 4.

PART 3 — Messianic References and Typological Patterns

Typological PatternKey Luke PassagesOT RootTheological SignificanceTranslation Sensitivity
Anointed Messiah / Isaiah’s Servant4:18-19; 22:37; 24:26,46Isaiah 61:1-2; Isaiah 53Jesus explicitly claims and then narratively fulfills the Isaianic Servant’s anointed, suffering, vindicated mission — the Gospel’s controlling messianic frame.CRITICAL — see помазал/помазание (Step 7-8); the Servant-typology thread must be traceable across the whole book, not isolated to 4:18.
New/Greater Moses9:28-36; 9:35 (Deuteronomy 18:15); 22:14-20 (new Passover/new covenant)Exodus 3, 24, 34; Deuteronomy 18:15; Jeremiah 31:31-34Jesus as the prophet like Moses who leads a new exodus and ratifies a new covenant; ties directly into “The Kingdom of God Present and Future” and the Romans-shared завет vocabulary.HIGH.
Son of David1:32-33; 3:31; 18:38-39; 20:41-442 Samuel 7 (Davidic covenant, echoed); Psalm 110:1Royal, enthroned messianic identity; directly continuous with the baseline’s seed_of_david entry and davidic_covenant doctrine.Medium/Critical (Critical specifically at 20:41-44’s Psalm 110:1 citation).
New Elijah/Elisha ministry pattern4:25-27; 7:11-17 (widow of Nain, echoing Elijah raising the widow’s son at Zarephath, 1 Kings 17:17-24); 9:54 (disciples wanting to call down fire, rebuked)1 Kings 17; 2 Kings 5Jesus’ compassion-driven miracles among the socially marginalized and even Gentile outsiders recapitulate and surpass Elijah/Elisha’s prophetic ministry.HIGH — directly reinforces “Jesus’ Compassion” and “Savior for All Nations” doctrines together.
Adam3:38Genesis 1-5Jesus’ genealogy traced to Adam as “son of God,” establishing his full, representative humanity — distinct in kind from his unique eternal Sonship (already flagged Step 7-8) and structurally parallel to (though not identical with) the Adam-Christ typology of Romans 5:12-21.Medium — flag for teaching-text cross-reference to Romans 5 without conflating the two distinct “son of God” senses.
Jonah11:29-32Jonah 1-3”As Jonah was a sign… so will the Son of Man be” — death/vindication typology plus Gentile-responsiveness contrast (Nineveh repented; “this generation” resists).High, per Part 2 entry above.
Jubilee (Year of the Lord’s Favor)4:19Leviticus 25:8-13The Jubilee’s debt-cancellation, slave-release, and land-rest provisions are the concrete legal-historical background Isaiah 61 draws on and Jesus claims to inaugurate; this is the single most important OT legal-institutional background for the entire core passage.CRITICAL — teaching text must supply the Leviticus 25 background explicitly, since Russian readers with low sustained OT narrative literacy cannot be assumed to recognize the Jubilee institution from the phrase “лето Господне благоприятное” alone.
Rejected Stone / Vindicated Cornerstone20:17Psalm 118:22Messianic rejection-then-exaltation pattern; parallel (though not verbally identical) OT “stone” testimony to Romans 9:33’s citation of Isaiah 28:16/8:14.High, per Part 1 entry above.
Suffering Servant, numbered with sinners22:37; 23:32-43 (crucified between two criminals)Isaiah 53:12Jesus’ death is narratively and textually identified with the Servant who “bore the sin of many” and was “numbered with the transgressors.”HIGH — direct link to Romans 10:16’s Isaiah 53:1 citation; see Part 4.
Son of Man (Danielic)25+ occurrences; climactic at 21:27; 22:69Daniel 7:13-14Authority, suffering, and coming glory combined in one title; already logged as a dedicated [NEW] glossary term (Step 8) — this entry supplies its specific OT citation anchor.Medium, per Step 8; teach the Daniel 7 background explicitly at first major occurrence (5:24).

PART 4 — Cross-Curriculum Parallels: Luke ↔ Romans, and Rendering-Consistency Rules

The Romans Language Package is the only other Russian-destination curriculum currently established for this language pair. The following table identifies passages, terms, or themes where Luke and Romans share an Old Testament citation, a direct theological argument, or a controlling vocabulary item, and specifies the rendering-consistency rule required to keep the two curricula from diverging in the destination language.

Shared ElementLuke Passage(s)Romans Passage(s)Nature of ParallelRendering-Consistency Rule
Faith as the ground of right standing before God7:9,50; 8:48; 17:19; 18:42 (faith-healing formula “your faith has saved you”)Romans 1:17 (citing Habakkuk 2:4); 3:22-28; 4:1-25Shared theological center (вера); Luke’s narrative healing-faith texts function as concrete case studies for the same trust-in-God principle Paul argues doctrinally.вера must be rendered identically in both curricula (per baseline translation_memory.json); Luke’s healing formula “ἡ πίστις σου σέσωκέν σε” should render as “вера твоя спасла тебя,” using [TM] спасение’s verbal form so the term-level continuity with Romans’ спасение doctrine is visible to the learner.
Abraham as father of faith1:55,73; 3:8; 13:16,28; 16:22-31; 19:9; 20:37 (Abraham referenced but Genesis 15:6 not directly quoted)Romans 4:3 (directly quotes Genesis 15:6); 4:9-22Luke repeatedly invokes Abraham as the covenant reference point for who truly belongs to God’s people (3:8’s warning against presuming on physical descent; 19:9’s Zacchaeus as “a son of Abraham”); Romans supplies the explicit doctrinal grounding (imputed righteousness) for why Abraham matters.Where Luke curriculum teaching text draws this connection explicitly (recommended at 19:9 and 3:8), use [TM] вменённая праведность by name and cite Genesis 15:6 directly, rather than leaving Luke’s Abraham references theologically free-floating.
”Doing” the Law versus receiving righteousness by faith10:25-28 (the lawyer’s question, “what must I do to inherit eternal life,” answered first by Leviticus 18:5’s “do this and you will live,” then reframed by the Good Samaritan parable)Romans 10:5 (directly quotes Leviticus 18:5); 10:6-13 (contrasting Deuteronomy 30 and faith-based confession)Both texts cite the identical OT legal formula (Leviticus 18:5) in service of two sides of the same argument: the law’s demand for perfect doing, contrasted with the gospel’s offer received by faith.Render Luke 10:28’s “так поступай, и будешь жить” (Synodal) and Romans 10:5’s equivalent Leviticus citation with the same verb (поступать/будешь жить) so a learner moving between curricula recognizes the identical OT source; teaching text in both curricula should cross-reference the other passage explicitly.
Universal offer of salvation, “everyone who calls”24:47 (repentance and forgiveness proclaimed to all nations); Acts 2:21 (Luke’s own sequel, quoting Joel 2:32 directly)Romans 10:12-13 (directly quotes Joel 2:32)Same OT text (Joel 2:32) stands directly behind Romans’ universal-scope argument and functions as the fulfilled reality Luke narrates in Acts; Luke’s Gospel itself supplies the mission mandate (24:47) that Acts/Joel then fulfill.Use [TM] спасение and the baseline’s mission-scope preference for народы (not язычники) at Luke 24:47, matching Romans 10:12-13’s “no distinction” universality exactly; do not soften either passage’s unqualified inclusiveness (per baseline’s universal_scope_of_gospel doctrine).
The Suffering Servant fulfilled22:37 (quotes Isaiah 53:12); 23:32-43 (numbered with criminals)Romans 10:16 (quotes Isaiah 53:1)Both curricula cite the same Isaiah 53 Servant Song, from different verses, applied to the same fulfillment claim.Ensure [TM] Мессия/Христос and пророк (of Isaiah) render identically; teaching text in Luke should note that Paul’s citation of the same chapter in Romans confirms this is the early church’s shared, foundational reading of Isaiah 53, not an isolated Lukan emphasis.
Christ’s exclusive Lordship, enthroned at God’s right hand20:42-43; 22:69 (both quote Psalm 110:1)Romans 8:34 (alludes to the same enthronement, “at the right hand of God”)Direct shared OT citation underlying the baseline’s Critical/High lordship_of_christ doctrine.Господь and the “right hand” (по правую руку / одесную) phrasing must match the baseline’s existing lordship_of_christ framing exactly; flag both Luke occurrences for the same Human theologian review routing already assigned to Romans 10:9 in the baseline registry.
Love of neighbor as law’s fulfillment10:27 (Jesus/the lawyer combine Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18)Romans 13:9-10 (quotes Leviticus 19:18 alone, as the summary of the second table of the Law)Same Levitical citation, doing the same summarizing theological work in both books.[NEW] ближний (neighbor, Step 8) must be rendered with the identical Russian word Romans 13:9 uses for the same Leviticus 19:18 citation; if Romans’ own translation memory does not yet log this specific verse, this analysis proposes логировать it there for full-canon consistency.
Grace apart from works, penitential cry18:13 (echoes Psalm 51:1, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner”)Romans 3:23-24; 4:4-5; 11:5-6 (grace-works contrast)Not a shared citation but a shared theological logic: the one who can offer nothing receives everything by grace; Luke narrates it, Romans argues it doctrinally.Render 18:13’s cry with [TM]-adjacent милость (per Step 8’s ἔλεος analysis, distinct from благодать) while ensuring surrounding teaching text draws the explicit line to Romans’ благодать doctrine — the two Russian words must not be blurred (see baseline’s grace entry and Step 7’s ἔλεος clarification).
New covenant inaugurated22:14-20 (Last Supper; alludes to Exodus 24:8 and Jeremiah 31:31-34)Romans (завет vocabulary throughout, e.g., 9:4; cf. Romans 11:27’s own echo of the new-covenant promise)Same завет word-family; Luke narrates the covenant’s historical inauguration, Romans reflects theologically on covenant faithfulness to Israel and the nations.Reuse [TM] завет exactly; explicitly distinguish “Новый Завет” the book-title from “новый завет” the covenant-reality per the [NEW] glossary entry logged in Step 8 — this distinction must hold consistently whenever the Luke curriculum’s teaching text cross-references Romans’ covenant discussions.
God who gives life to the dead / resurrection hope20:37-38 (quotes Exodus 3:6; “he is not God of the dead but of the living”)Romans 4:17 (“God who gives life to the dead”)Thematic (not verbal) parallel: both texts ground resurrection hope in God’s own life-giving character revealed to the patriarchs.No shared citation to render identically, but teaching text in both curricula should be encouraged to cross-reference this shared theological logic; use [TM] воскресение-family vocabulary consistently in both.

General Rendering-Consistency Principle for Future Curricula

Wherever a future curriculum in this language pipeline shares an OT citation, a Greek/Hebrew term already logged in translation_memory.json, or a controlling theological argument with either Romans or Luke, the destination-language rendering established first in whichever curriculum treats it must be reused exactly, and any new curriculum-specific nuance must be layered on as an explicit teaching note rather than a silent re-rendering. This preserves the cross-curriculum vocabulary consistency the baseline’s 12_ai_translation_requirements.md already mandates within a single curriculum, extended here across curricula.


PART 5 — Chapters Reviewed with No New Direct OT Citation

The following chapters were fully reviewed and contain no direct OT quotation beyond what is already logged above under an adjoining chapter’s allusion entries; they are noted here explicitly per the full-coverage mandate rather than silently omitted:

  • Luke 5 — No direct quotation; Leviticus 14’s cleansing-rite background is implicit in the leper’s healing (5:12-14) and is treated at the term level (прокажённый) in Step 7-8 rather than as a citation.
  • Luke 8 — No direct OT quotation. The sower parable’s imagery loosely echoes the wisdom tradition’s sowing/harvest metaphors (cf. Psalm 126:5-6, Hosea 8:7) but does not cite a specific text; no dedicated cross-reference entry is warranted beyond this note.
  • Luke 12 — Reviewed; only allusion is Micah 7:6 (logged in Part 2).
  • Luke 16 — No direct quotation; “Moses and the Prophets” (16:29,31) functions as a canonical shorthand for the whole OT rather than a citation of a specific text, reinforcing the fulfillment_of_prophecy doctrine generally.

End of Step 3, Document 1 (09_cross_reference_analysis.md). Proceed to 10_biblical_theme_map.md for the thematic-structural companion analysis.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words