Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference and Theme Analysis — 2 Peter

Method and Scope

This document fulfills PRD Phase 1 Step 3 for the 2 Peter curriculum (destination language Russian). It covers every Old Testament quotation and allusion, every messianic reference, every typological pattern, and every significant parallel to other curricula in this language — especially the seeded Romans Language Package — across the entire letter, chapters 1–3, not merely the core passage (2 Peter 1:16–21). It builds directly on 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md and does not re-derive terms already risk-tiered there; it cites them by rendering only.

No chapter of 2 Peter lacks cross-reference material requiring documentation: all three chapters contribute OT allusions/quotations, and Part E documents specific rendering-consistency obligations toward the Romans package.

Citation format: All Scripture references in this document use the normalizable English form (Book Chapter:Verse, e.g. “Genesis 15:6”, “2 Peter 1:16”) for internal Phase 1 cross-referencing. Phase 2 output text itself must follow the Russian Synodal abbreviation conventions below, per the baseline’s Cross-Reference Preservation Rules.

Citation Normalization Table (extending the Romans baseline)

Book (EN)Normalized EN formRussian Synodal abbreviation
GenesisGenesis 1:1Быт.
NumbersNumbers 24:17Чис.
DeuteronomyDeuteronomy 29:23Втор.
PsalmsPsalm 90:4Пс.
ProverbsProverbs 26:11Притч.
IsaiahIsaiah 65:17Ис.
JeremiahJeremiah 17:15Иер.
EzekielEzekiel 33:11Иез.
DanielDaniel 7:14Дан.
MalachiMalachi 2:17Мал.
MatthewMatthew 17:5Мф.
MarkMark 9:7Мк.
LukeLuke 9:35Лк.
JohnJohn 21:18Ин.
ActsActs 5:31Деян.
RomansRomans 8:21Рим.
1 Corinthians1 Corinthians 6:201 Кор.
GalatiansGalatians 2:9Гал.
EphesiansEphesians 4:15Еф.
TitusTitus 2:13Тит.
HebrewsHebrews 1:1Евр.
JamesJames 1:2Иак.
1 Peter1 Peter 3:201 Пет.
2 Peter2 Peter 1:162 Пет.
JudeJude 6Иуд.
1 Thessalonians1 Thessalonians 5:21 Фес.
RevelationRevelation 21:1Откр.

Part A — Cross-Reference Matrix

Chapter 1

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
2 Peter 1:1Righteousness granting faith; deity of ChristPeter, Simeon Peter (self-designation), addresseesRomans 1:17; Romans 3:21-22; 2 Corinthians 5:21праведность (High, baseline) — syntax here (received “by/in the righteousness of…”) is causal/instrumental, not Romans’ forensic-declarative argument; do not force into an identical mold without comment.
2 Peter 1:1Savior title continuityJesus ChristLuke 2:11; Acts 5:31; Titus 2:13; Titus 3:6Спаситель (Medium, new) — must render identically at all 5 letter occurrences (1:1, 1:11, 2:20, 3:2, 3:18).
2 Peter 1:2Apostolic greeting formulaPeter, addresseesRomans 1:7; 1 Corinthians 1:3; Galatians 1:3благодать и мир (Critical/Medium, baseline) — exact reuse mandatory; identical Russian phrase already fixed by Romans package.
2 Peter 1:3-4Divine power granting life/godliness; partaking of divine natureRomans 8:29 (conformed to the image of the Son); 2 Corinthians 3:18 (transformed… from glory to glory); John 1:12-13Critical (theosis proof-text) — see 07/08 notes on причастник/Божеское естество; must name theosis explicitly if referenced, not silently blend or reject.
2 Peter 1:4Escaping corruption (φθορά)Romans 8:21 — direct verbal parallel: “creation itself… freed from its bondage to corruption (φθορά)“High — Romans 8:21 already uses the identical Greek term φθορά; the Russian rendering (тление/растление) used in the 2 Peter package MUST be checked against however Romans 8:21 renders it, to preserve cross-curriculum consistency of this exact Greek word.
2 Peter 1:5-7Virtue chain (growth in Christian character)Romans 5:3-5 (suffering→endurance→character→hope, structurally parallel chain); Galatians 5:22-23 (fruit of the Spirit); James 1:2-4Medium — thematic, not verbal, parallel; curriculum should note the structural similarity to Romans 5 without implying vocabulary identity (different Greek terms).
2 Peter 1:9Cleansing from past sinsTitus 3:5; Hebrews 9:14; 1 John 1:9Medium — reuse баseline sin (грех, High); “очищение” risk of ritual-purification misreading (see 07 analysis).
2 Peter 1:10Calling and election secured by diligenceRomans 8:28-30; Romans 9:11; Romans 11:29 — direct doctrinal and terminological parallelHigh/Critical — призвание/избрание MUST be reused exactly from the Romans package (both High in baseline); apply same судьба/предопределение caution.
2 Peter 1:11Eternal kingdomDaniel 7:14, 27 (OT eternal-kingdom promise); Romans 14:17; 2 Timothy 4:18Medium — reuse kingdom_of_god (Царство Божие); Daniel gives OT typological grounding for “eternal” (вечное) kingdom absent from Romans’ more inaugurated-kingdom emphasis.
2 Peter 1:14Peter’s foretold death (“exodus”)Peter, JesusJohn 21:18-19 (Jesus foretells Peter’s death); Luke 9:31 (Christ’s own “exodus” spoken of at the Transfiguration)Medium — literary link between 1:14-15’s “departure” (ἔξοδος) and the Transfiguration account that follows in 1:16-18 (also using ἔξοδος-adjacent imagery in Luke’s parallel); do not let “исход” over-technicalize the plain sense of death.
2 Peter 1:16-18Transfiguration; eyewitness authorityPeter, James, John (implicit), Moses and Elijah (present in Synoptic accounts though unnamed here), God the FatherMatthew 17:1-8; Mark 9:2-8; Luke 9:28-36 (same historical event, direct NT narrative parallel); background: Exodus 24:15-18; Exodus 34:29 (Sinai theophany); Psalm 2:7 (“You are my Son”); Isaiah 42:1 (Servant “in whom my soul delights”)High — the Father’s declaration “Сын Мой возлюбленный” must match exactly the Synodal wording already used for Matthew 17:5 / Mark 9:7 / Luke 9:35 in any parallel Gospel curriculum, per baseline consistency rules; do not introduce a fresh phrasing for 2 Peter’s citation of the same event.
2 Peter 1:18”Holy mountain”Exodus 24:15-18 (Sinai); Psalm 2:6 (“my holy mountain,” Zion); Matthew 17:1 (“a high mountain”)High — «Святая Гора» collision with Mount Athos (see 07/08); every occurrence requires explicit Transfiguration-mountain framing in the Russian text.
2 Peter 1:19”Morning star” — messianic hopeNumbers 24:17 (Balaam’s oracle: “a star shall come out of Jacob” — messianic); Revelation 22:16 (Jesus self-identifies as “the morning star”); Malachi 4:2 (“sun of righteousness”) — contrast Isaiah 14:12 (a different, negative “morning star/Lucifer” figure)High — messianic typological chain (Numbers→Revelation) must be preserved; Isaiah 14:12’s unrelated “Lucifer” figure must be kept entirely distinct — never let “утренняя звезда” drift toward that figure; forbidden substitution “фосфор” applies absolutely (see 08 glossary).
2 Peter 1:19-21Prophetic word; verbal-plenary inspirationOld Testament prophets2 Timothy 3:16 (“all Scripture is God-breathed”); Hebrews 1:1 (“God spoke by the prophets”); 1 Peter 1:10-12 (prophets searched what the Spirit indicated)High/Critical — direct verbal-inspiration parallel within the Petrine corpus (1 Peter) reinforces this passage’s doctrine; ties to baseline inspiration_of_scripture (High in Romans registry), which requires the curriculum’s implicit sola-scriptura-adjacent stance to be stated explicitly rather than assumed against Orthodox Предание categories.

Chapter 2

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
2 Peter 2:1False prophets/teachers arisingOld Testament false prophets (unnamed)Deuteronomy 13:1-5 (test for false prophets); Matthew 7:15 (“wolves in sheep’s clothing”); 1 Timothy 4:1; Jude 4 (extremely close literary parallel — much of 2 Peter 2 parallels Jude verse-for-verse)High — лжеучитель (High, new) risk of the term’s contemporary Orthodox-polemical use against Protestants/Evangelicals (see 08); frame by Peter’s own specific criteria.
2 Peter 2:1Christ’s atoning purchase (“bought them”)1 Corinthians 6:20; 1 Corinthians 7:23 (“bought with a price”); Romans 14:9 (“Lord of both the dead and the living”)High — атonement/redemption language; apply the baseline’s mandatory theologian-escalation rule (искупил) exactly as for Romans 3:25-adjacent propitiation content.
2 Peter 2:1δεσπότης — absolute MasterJesus ChristContrast/complement to κύριος throughout Romans (Господь, Critical)High — «Владыка» risks confusion with the contemporary Orthodox bishop’s title; recommend Synodal «Господа» for running text (see 08), matching baseline lord.
2 Peter 2:4Angels who sinned, judgedFallen angels (unnamed)Genesis 6:1-4 (the “sons of God”); Jude 6 (near-identical parallel); extra-biblical Second Temple tradition (1 Enoch) forms shared background material for both Jude and 2 PeterCritical-adjacent — do not import 1 Enoch’s specific mythological content explicitly into the Russian expository text; note the shared literary background with Jude 6 for teaching purposes without treating non-canonical material as Scripture.
2 Peter 2:5Noah and the FloodNoahGenesis 6:1-9:17; Matthew 24:37-39; Luke 17:26-27; Hebrews 11:7; 1 Peter 3:20Medium — потоп (Low, baseline-adjacent); typological pattern (water judgment) developed further at 3:5-7 (fire judgment).
2 Peter 2:6Sodom and Gomorrah destroyedPeople of Sodom and GomorrahGenesis 19:24-25; Deuteronomy 29:23; Jude 7; Luke 17:29Medium — establishes the fire-judgment precedent picked up explicitly in 3:7; keep the historical-narrative referent concrete, not merely idiomatic (“as in Sodom and Gomorrah” as a stock phrase).
2 Peter 2:7-8Lot rescuedLotGenesis 19:1-29High — праведный (High, baseline) applied to Lot; here the “venerable righteous exemplar” connotation is a mild asset, but curriculum should clarify rescue-by-grace, not moral perfection, per baseline righteousness caution.
2 Peter 2:9God rescues the godly, keeps the unrighteous for judgmentNoah, Lot (summarized)Same as 2:5-8 above; anticipates 3:7’s “day of judgment”Medium — суд (Medium, new) converges positively with Orthodox Страшный Суд iconography; NT-specific timing content must not be left to default to traditional imagery alone.
2 Peter 2:15-16Balaam, mercenary false prophetBalaamNumbers 22:21-35 (Balaam’s donkey speaks); Numbers 31:16; Deuteronomy 23:4-5; Jude 11; Revelation 2:14Medium — Валаам (Low, baseline place-name homograph with the Orthodox Valaam Monastery is not a genuine confusion risk given clear OT narrative framing); ironic contrast with the genuine prophetic word of 1:19-21 should be drawn out explicitly in exposition.
2 Peter 2:19Slaves of corruption promising freedomFalse teachersRomans 6:16-22 — direct doctrinal parallel (slaves of sin vs. slaves of righteousness)High — раб (Medium, baseline) and свобода (Medium, new) must be handled with the same slavery/freedom framework Romans 6 already establishes; do not let свобода drift toward modern political-liberty connotations.
2 Peter 2:20-22Relapse into corruption worse than beforeMatthew 12:43-45 (unclean spirit returns, worse state); Luke 11:24-26Medium — warns against relapse after “knowing the way of righteousness”; ties epignōsis/gnōsis distinction from ch.1.
2 Peter 2:22Closing proverb: dog and vomit / sow and mireProverbs 26:11 — direct, explicit OT quotation (“As a dog returns to its vomit…”); the “sow that is washed returns to wallow in the mire” clause is extra-biblical proverbial material (paralleled in ancient Near Eastern wisdom literature, e.g. the Aramaic Ahiqar tradition, not found in canonical Scripture)High — must clearly distinguish, in any footnote or expository framing, that only the first half is a direct Scripture quotation (Proverbs 26:11); the second half must not be presented to Russian readers as itself a biblical quotation.

Chapter 3

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
2 Peter 3:2Prophets and apostles as joint authoritative testimonyOT prophets, the apostlesDirect restatement/summary of 1:19-21’s inspiration doctrine; parallel Ephesians 2:20 (“apostles and prophets” as the church’s foundation)High — reinforces inspiration_of_scripture; places OT prophetic word and NT apostolic command on the same authoritative plane, directly relevant to canonicity.
2 Peter 3:4Scoffers’ taunt: “Where is the promise of his coming?”Scoffers/mockersMalachi 2:17; Isaiah 5:19; Jeremiah 17:15; Psalm 42:3, 10 (mocking “where is your God?”)Medium — established OT taunt-question literary pattern; ties certainty_of_christs_return doctrine, must retain the mocking, doubt-provoking force rather than softening it into neutral inquiry.
2 Peter 3:5-6Creation and the Flood by the word of GodNoah (implicit)Genesis 1:6-9 (waters separated by God’s word); Genesis 7:11 (the Flood); Psalm 33:6 (“by the word of the LORD the heavens were made”)Medium — ties creation-by-word to judgment-by-word, foundational for the fire-judgment argument that follows.
2 Peter 3:7Present heavens/earth reserved for fireIsaiah 66:15-16; Zephaniah 1:18; Malachi 4:1; Matthew 3:11-12 (John the Baptist’s fire imagery)High — typological escalation water→fire; “сберегаются для огня” must retain purposeful divine reservation, ties to providence (промысел Божий, High baseline).
2 Peter 3:8”With the Lord a day is as a thousand years”Psalm 90:4 — direct, explicit OT quotation/allusionHigh — central proof-text for patience_of_gods_timing; must be rendered as a genuine scriptural citation, not a generic proverb about time’s relativity.
2 Peter 3:9God’s patience; not wishing any to perishEzekiel 18:23, 32; Ezekiel 33:11 (“I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked”); Romans 2:4 — direct thematic parallel (“God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance”)Critical — universal-offer language (μακροθυμία/долготерпение and μὴ… τινας ἀπολέσθαι/не желая, чтобы кто погиб) sits in tension with 1:10’s “calling and election”; apply baseline’s election/predestination escalation rule; must not soften or over-qualify the universal offer, per Romans’ universal_scope_of_gospel consistency requirement.
2 Peter 3:10Day of the Lord comes as a thiefMatthew 24:42-44; Luke 12:39-40; 1 Thessalonians 5:2; Revelation 3:3; Revelation 16:15 — direct verbal parallel across the NTHigh — “как вор”/“словно тать” (thief image) must render consistently with any Gospel/Thessalonians curricula using this same image in this language, per forward cross-curriculum consistency.
2 Peter 3:12-13New heavens and new earthIsaiah 65:17; Isaiah 66:22 — direct OT quotation/echo; Revelation 21:1Medium — “новое небо и новая земля” must match whatever rendering is used in any existing or future Isaiah/Revelation curricula in this language; flag for forward cross-curriculum consistency review.
2 Peter 3:13Righteousness dwells in the new creationIsaiah 32:17; Isaiah 60:21; Psalm 85:10-13High — праведность (High, baseline) reused; OT background gives righteousness a settled, environmental/cosmic sense here beyond Romans’ forensic-declarative emphasis — note but do not force into that single mold.
2 Peter 3:15Paul’s wisdom; recognition of Paul’s lettersPaulGalatians 2:9 (Paul’s apostolic recognition by the Jerusalem pillars); the Pauline corpus generally, including RomansHigh — direct literary bridge to the Romans curriculum itself; “наш любимый брат Павел” (our beloved brother Paul) should be rendered consistently with however Paul is named/introduced in the Romans package’s introductory materials, if any exist.
2 Peter 3:16Paul’s letters called “Scripture” (γραφαί)PaulDirect canonical/inspiration statement placing the Pauline corpus, including Romans, on par with the OT γραφαί already discussed at 1:20-21Critical — “Писание” must be the single consistent Russian term for γραφή used across both the Romans and 2 Peter packages (OT citations within Romans, e.g. Genesis 15:6 quoted at Romans 4:3, and the Pauline corpus itself here); this verse is the letter’s most direct statement of canonicity and must be handled with the same rigor as inspiration_of_scripture (High in the Romans registry).
2 Peter 3:18Closing charge: grow in grace and knowledge; doxologyEphesians 4:15 (“grow up… into Christ”); Romans 11:36; Romans 16:27 — direct doxological parallel (“to him be glory… Amen”)High — “Ему слава” doxological formula should match, where the underlying Greek doxology structure is equivalent, however Romans 16:27 renders its closing doxology, per the baseline’s cross-document consistency rules; also bookends 2 Peter 1:2 (grace) and the ἐπίγνωσις/γνῶσις distinction established across the letter (see 07/08 notes on the deliberate γνῶσις-not-ἐπίγνωσις wording here).

Part B — Direct Old Testament Quotations (Explicit)

2 Peter PassageOT SourceQuotation TypeNotes
2 Peter 2:22aProverbs 26:11Direct quotation”As a dog returns to its vomit, so a fool repeats his folly” — applied to apostate false teachers.
2 Peter 3:8Psalm 90:4Direct allusion/near-quotation”With the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”
2 Peter 3:13Isaiah 65:17; 66:22Direct echo”New heavens and a new earth” — near-verbatim phrase.

Note: 2 Peter 2:22b (the sow-and-mire clause) is explicitly not an OT quotation and must not be presented as one; see Part A, ch.2 row for 2 Peter 2:22.


Part C — Messianic References

PassageMessianic ContentOT RootNT Trajectory
2 Peter 1:1”our God and Savior Jesus Christ”Isaiah 43:11 (God alone as Savior)Titus 2:13; deity of Christ doctrine
2 Peter 1:11, 3:18”our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (fixed title, 5x)Consistent NT Christological title
2 Peter 1:16-18Transfiguration glory as foretaste of the ParousiaPsalm 2:7; Isaiah 42:1Matthew 17:1-8 and parallels; anticipates Christ’s return in glory
2 Peter 1:19”Morning star”Numbers 24:17 — Balaam’s messianic star oracleRevelation 22:16 — Christ’s self-identification as the morning star
2 Peter 3:2, 3:15-16Prophets and apostles jointly testify to ChristWhole OT prophetic corpusHebrews 1:1-2 (“in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son”)

Part D — Typological Patterns

Type (OT Pattern)Antitype / Fulfillment in 2 PeterPassageNotes
Sinai theophany (Exodus 24, 34)Transfiguration on the “holy mountain”2 Peter 1:16-18Both are mountain-top, voice-of-God, glory-manifestation events; do not let the Mount Athos collision (see Part A) obscure this typological link.
The Flood (Genesis 6-9)The coming Day-of-the-Lord judgment by fire2 Peter 2:5; 3:5-7Explicit water→fire escalation pattern; Peter argues from a past precedent to a future certainty.
Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19)Judgment of false teachers/the ungodly2 Peter 2:6-9Precedent for both fire-judgment and rescue-of-the-righteous typology.
Noah and Lot rescued amid judgmentAssurance that God rescues the godly2 Peter 2:5, 7-9Pastoral typological pattern: judgment on the wicked does not preclude God’s care for his own.
Balaam, prophet-for-hire (Numbers 22-24)The false teachers’ greed-driven “prophecy”2 Peter 2:15-16Negative type, contrasted with the genuine prophetic word of 1:19-21.

Part E — Parallels to the Romans Curriculum: Rendering-Consistency Rules

The following terms/references occur in both the Romans and 2 Peter packages (or are structurally/verbally parallel) and must use identical or explicitly reconciled Russian renderings across both curricula.

Shared Term / ReferenceRomans Locus2 Peter LocusRequired Russian RenderingConsistency Rule
grace and peace (greeting)Romans 1:72 Peter 1:2благодать и мирVerbatim identical phrase; no variation permitted.
calling and electionRomans 8:28-30; 9:112 Peter 1:10призвание и избраниеReuse baseline exactly; same High/Medium risk tiers apply.
corruption (φθορά)Romans 8:212 Peter 1:4; 2:12, 19тление / растлениеIdentical underlying Greek word; the Russian choice made for Romans 8:21 (if already fixed in a Romans-specific document) governs 2 Peter’s rendering — do not introduce a second Russian word for the same Greek term across the two curricula.
slaves of sin/corruption vs. freedomRomans 6:16-222 Peter 2:19раб / свободаSame slavery-freedom conceptual frame; свобода must carry the same moral-bondage-vs-freedom sense in both, not drift toward political liberty in either.
Lord (κύριος)Romans 10:9; throughout2 Peter 1:2 and throughout (15x)ГосподьReuse baseline exactly, Critical tier; 2 Peter’s δεσπότης (2:1) is a distinct, stronger Greek term and should not be collapsed into an identical rendering without a footnote distinguishing its absolute-ownership force.
God’s patience leading to repentanceRomans 2:42 Peter 3:9, 3:15долготерпение (2 Peter) — note Romans 2:4 uses the same Greek root; ensure the Romans package’s own rendering of Romans 2:4 is checked and reconciled with долготерпение hereBoth texts make the identical theological move (patience → space for repentance); the Russian expository framing in both curricula should use compatible vocabulary so students recognize the shared argument.
universal salvific desire / universal gospel scopeRomans 10:12-13 (universal_scope_of_gospel, High)2 Peter 3:9 (“not wishing that any should perish”)не желая, чтобы кто погиб / всеобщий охватBoth must retain unqualified universal language; neither curriculum should let election/predestination categories silently soften the universal offer — apply the identical Human-theologian escalation rule from the Romans package.
Paul and his letters (including Romans itself)2 Peter 3:15-16Павел; Писание2 Peter 3:16 explicitly names Paul’s letters as Scripture; “Писание” (γραφή) must be the single consistent term across both packages for canonical Scripture, whether OT or NT.
doxology (“to him be glory… Amen”)Romans 11:36; 16:272 Peter 3:18Ему слава … аминьMatch doxological form used in Romans’ closing doxology wherever the underlying Greek structure is equivalent.
righteousness (δικαιοσύνη)Romans 1:17; 3:21-22; throughout2 Peter 1:1; 2:5, 21; 3:13праведностьReuse baseline exactly (High); note syntactic differences per Part A entries above without changing the term.
new heavens and new earth(not present in Romans; forward-looking cross-curriculum note)2 Peter 3:13новое небо и новая земляFlag for consistency with any future Isaiah- or Revelation-based curricula in this language pipeline.
Day of the Lord thief-image(not present in Romans; forward-looking cross-curriculum note)2 Peter 3:10как вор / словно татьFlag for consistency with any future Gospel (Matthew 24) or 1 Thessalonians curricula.

Part F — Note on Non-Canonical Source Material

Two passages draw on material outside the Protestant biblical canon and require careful framing so the Russian text does not present non-Scriptural material as Scripture:

  1. 2 Peter 2:4 (angels who sinned) shares background tradition with Jude 6 and Second Temple Jewish literature (notably 1 Enoch’s expanded angel-fall narrative). The curriculum should teach the canonical content (fallen angels, kept for judgment) without importing 1 Enoch’s specific narrative details as though authoritative.
  2. 2 Peter 2:22b (the sow returning to the mire) is proverbial material paralleled in ancient Near Eastern wisdom literature (e.g., the Ahiqar tradition) rather than an OT quotation, unlike 2:22a’s direct citation of Proverbs 26:11. See Part B above.

Both cases should be flagged for native-speaker/theologian review if expository material in Phase 2 risks conflating canonical and non-canonical sources for Russian readers, some of whom (via Orthodox catechesis) may already be familiar with a wider deuterocanonical/patristic literary landscape than a typical Protestant reader.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words