Linguistic Gap Analysis
Linguistic Gap Analysis: Luke 1–24 (Koine Greek/English → Russian)
Purpose
This analysis identifies where standard Russian religious vocabulary is adequate, where it is missing (no natural single-word or fixed-phrase equivalent exists), and where it is crowded (an existing Russian term is serviceable but sits inside a semantic neighborhood dominated by a different, non-identical concept — chiefly Russian Orthodox sacramental/devotional categories, Soviet-era secular flattening, or unrelated folk/occult vocabulary). It extends the baseline Romans translation_memory.json gap analysis to the eight Luke curriculum doctrines and the core passage, Luke 4:16-21, and prepares the ground for the Step 7 semantic analysis and Step 8 core glossary (already drafted; this document supplies its underlying rationale where not already stated there).
This document does not re-litigate terms the baseline Romans package has already settled ([TM] terms); it focuses on new lexical territory Luke’s narrative-Gospel genre and its eight doctrine emphases open up that Paul’s epistolary argument in Romans did not require.
A. Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix
For each of the eight curriculum doctrines: the available Russian terms, the specific weakness or gap each carries, and the recommended translation strategy.
1. Jesus as Savior for All Nations and All People (Jew and Gentile, Rich and Poor)
| Available Russian Terms | Weakness / Gap | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Спаситель [NEW, title-level extension of спасение] | Popular devotional shorthand (“Спаси и сохрани,” worn on jewelry/talismans) risks a folk-protective-charm reading rather than a decisive, historically anchored rescuer; also risks unqualified absorption into the theosis process per baseline’s спасение note. | Always co-occur with a concrete narrative anchor (Zacchaeus 19:9-10, the sinful woman 7:50) rather than standing alone as an abstract title. |
| язычники / народы [TM] | язычники skews toward “pagans” (a value-laden, semi-pejorative register); over-corrects toward exclusion if used in every “nations” context. | Reserve язычники for contexts genuinely opposing Israel/idolatry; use народы for neutral mission-scope statements (2:32; 24:47), matching baseline practice. |
| богатый / нищий [NEW pair] | Russian intuitively ranks богатый positively and нищий negatively (social-status connotation), the reverse of Luke’s spiritual valuation (6:20-26). | Teaching text must state the reversal explicitly at every Beatitudes/Woes occurrence; do not let the terms’ ordinary connotations silently reassert themselves. |
| самарянин [NEW] | No native Russian ethnic-religious rivalry maps onto Jewish-Samaritan tension; risk of reading as a neutral geographic label only. | Explicit historical-cultural footnote required at first occurrence (9:52-53); cannot be inferred from the word alone — a genuine missing-background gap, not merely a lexical one. |
| царь [NEW] | Heavy Russian imperial/tsarist resonance (see doctrine matrix item 6 below). | See Kingdom doctrine below; cross-reference required. |
Overall risk driver: the doctrine’s universalism collides with Russia’s historic “Third Rome”/Holy Rus’ self-identification of Orthodoxy with the nation. No single term carries this risk; it is a framing risk running through гентtiles, народы, and Царство Божие together.
2. The Holy Spirit’s Work in Salvation History
| Available Russian Terms | Weakness / Gap | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Святой Дух [TM] | Settled, Critical-risk term; no Luke-specific weakness beyond baseline’s “never дух alone” rule, intensified here by sheer density of occurrence (highest concentration of any Gospel). | Reuse exactly; add teaching note on density/emphasis unique to Luke. |
| помазал / помазание [NEW] | Crowded neighborhood: помазание is the ordinary Russian name for the Orthodox sacrament of Chrismation (Таинство Миропомазания), administered to every baptized Orthodox believer shortly after baptism. A reader may default to “he received the sacrament” rather than “God consecrated him for a unique messianic office.” | Explicit fencing note required at 4:18 distinguishing (a) Jesus’ unique, unrepeatable, Spirit-empowering consecration to the messianic office from (b) the sacramental rite bearing the same Russian name. Never let the word stand unglossed at its first, most load-bearing occurrence. |
| силу свыше [NEW] | Low ambiguity but under-connected; readers may not spontaneously link Jesus’ own Spirit-anointing (3:22/4:1/4:18) with the disciples’ promised empowering (24:49) since two different Russian phrases (помазание vs. силу свыше) are used for structurally parallel events. | Teaching text must state the inclusio explicitly: the same Spirit who empowered Jesus now empowers his followers. |
| бес / демон; нечистый дух [NEW, contrast term] | Post-Soviet folk culture keeps a live, semi-comic бес folklore register (leshy/bes tricksters) alongside a live экстрасенс/folk-healer culture; either can trivialize or sensationalize. | Narrative descriptions of exorcism must retain clinical seriousness and clear divine-versus-demonic power contrast; avoid horror-genre or folkloric diction. |
| осенит (overshadow) [NEW] | Low risk, but adjacent to comparative-religion “divine conception” narratives increasingly known via popular media. | Retain established chaste Synodal term; no additional gloss needed beyond what Step 8 already provides. |
3. Good News to the Poor and Marginalized
| Available Russian Terms | Weakness / Gap | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| нищий / бедный [NEW] | нищий colloquially evokes a beggar figure regarded with a mix of pity and suspicion (post-Soviet urban begging is a live, sometimes distrusted phenomenon); risk of premature “poor in spirit” spiritualizing borrowed from the more familiar Matthean Beatitudes register. | Use нищий for Scripture-register citation (matches Synodal 4:18; 6:20) but pair with expository бедный and concrete narrative illustration (widow’s mite, Lazarus at the gate) to keep the referent economic and unqualified. |
| благовествовать нищим [NEW, verbal] | Risk of collapsing into Евангелие’s “book” association (baseline note) rather than an active, targeted proclamation event. | Preserve the verbal form; do not nominalize into “Евангелие для нищих” as a book title. |
| освобождение / свобода / отпустить [NEW — split ἄφεσις root] | Genuine missing-vocabulary gap: Greek ἄφεσις unifies “forgiveness of sins,” “release of captives,” and “liberty for the oppressed” under a single root; Russian has no single word spanning all three senses, splitting them across прощение, освобождение/свобода, and отпустить. | Explicit unifying teaching note required at 4:18-19 connecting Jubilee-release, social liberation, and forgiveness of sins as one Isaianic concept Luke intends as a single reality, not three separate blessings. |
| вдова, прокажённый [NEW] | Both terms are clinically/socially accurate but under-communicate first-century social exclusion (widow = economically defenseless with no legal recourse; leper = ritually unclean and physically banished from community) to a modern reader who may read purely medically/materially. | Brief social-context gloss at first occurrence of each; do not assume the exclusion dimension is self-evident. |
| маммона [NEW, transliteration retained] | Low risk; may be read as simply “money” rather than a personified rival power. | Gloss explicitly as “wealth treated as a rival master,” not currency itself. |
4. Repentance and Forgiveness of Sins
| Available Russian Terms | Weakness / Gap | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| покаяние [NEW, CRITICAL] | Crowded neighborhood — the single highest-priority fencing requirement in this document. покаяние is tightly bound in ordinary Russian Orthodox usage to the sacrament of Confession (Исповедь / Таинство Покаяния), typically priest-mediated and preparatory to Communion. Luke presents repentance as a direct, unmediated turning of the whole person to God (3:3,8; 5:32; 15:7,10; 24:47), not primarily a liturgical rite. | Explicit distinguishing note required at every doctrinally load-bearing occurrence: repentance is the turning itself, prior to and independent of any sacramental form, while not denying that ongoing repentance may be later expressed sacramentally in a reader’s own church tradition. Never let покаяние silently gloss as “going to confession.” |
| прощение грехов [NEW] | Risk of conflation with оправдание (justification) — both are real, distinct, and both present in Luke (5:20-24 forgiveness; 18:14 justification). Russian speakers may treat them as loose synonyms. | Teach both terms side by side at least once, showing forgiveness (removal of guilt) and justification (positive declared-righteous status) as related but distinct realities. |
| погибший / потерянная [NEW — split ἀπόλλυμι root] | Missing-vocabulary gap: Russian register naturally splits a single Greek verb-family across потерянная (lost object/animal) and погибший (lost/perished person, a stronger and more final-sounding word). This makes Luke 15’s single unifying “lost-and-found” thread less visible, and risks implying the prodigal’s state (погибший, 15:24,32) was irreversible. | Explicit note connecting all three parables (sheep, coin, son) as one continuous argument; clarify погибший describes the son’s condition, not a permanent verdict, given the father’s active search-and-restore initiative. |
| ад / лоно Авраамово [NEW] | ад defaults in ordinary and popular-Orthodox usage to final, post-judgment “hell,” collapsing Luke 16:22-23’s distinct intermediate-state ᾅδης into the reader’s existing final-hell concept (γέεννα). | One clarifying note required distinguishing intermediate ад from final γέεννα, without fully systematizing the parable, whose primary point is the moral/economic reversal of rich and poor, not afterlife geography. |
| рай [NEW] | Comparatively low risk; functions as the culturally expected positive counterpart to ад. | Preserve the immediate, personal, pastoral force of 23:43’s promise to the penitent criminal; no heavy gloss needed. |
5. Prayer and Dependence on God
| Available Russian Terms | Weakness / Gap | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| молитва / молиться [NEW] | Orthodox devotional culture weights heavily toward fixed, memorized, often archaic Church-Slavonic-inflected prayers (акафисты, молитвослов); Luke’s emphasis on spontaneous, confident, child-to-Father address (11:2-4) may read as a foreign, low-liturgy Protestant innovation rather than an equally legitimate biblical pattern. | Teach spontaneous dependent prayer as Luke’s emphasis without denigrating fixed forms; frame as complementary, not competing, practices. |
| милость [NEW, distinct from благодать] | Low-medium risk on its own, but requires careful boundary-setting against благодать (χάρις), since English “grace” and “mercy” can appear to overlap while Greek χάρις/ἔλεος are distinct. | Reinforce baseline’s explicit ruling: милость = ἔλεος (covenant-loyalty compassion, Magnificat/Benedictus/publican’s cry) and благодать = χάρις (unmerited favor); do not blur even though both terms are “warm” in register. |
| ходатайство [TM] | Settled; low residual risk given clear fencing already established against заступничество. | Reuse exactly at 22:32. |
| Отец / Авва [TM] | Settled; no new Luke-specific weakness beyond reinforcing never-батюшка rule at 11:2, 15:12-32. | Reuse exactly. |
6. The Kingdom of God Present and Future
| Available Russian Terms | Weakness / Gap | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Царство Божие [TM] | Baseline’s tsardom/imperial-nostalgia risk, intensified in Luke by sheer frequency (30+ occurrences) and by the added “present and future” tension unique to this curriculum’s doctrine framing. | Reinforce at every major occurrence that this is a spiritual, already-inaugurated-yet-not-consummated reign, neither a lost imperial past nor a future political restoration. |
| внутрь вас есть (17:21) [NEW] | Genuine grammatical ambiguity in the Greek (ἐντὸς ὑμῶν = “within you” individually or “among/in the midst of you” corporately) compounded by the fact that the established Synodal rendering happens to converge suggestively with Russian Orthodox hesychastic/mystical spirituality’s emphasis on interior encounter with divine grace in the heart — an attractive but potentially skewing convergence that could make readers assume the individual-inward reading is settled exegesis rather than one live option among two. | Present both readings explicitly; do not let the Synodal wording’s devotional resonance silently foreclose the “in your midst” (corporate, kingdom-already-present-in-Jesus’-person) alternative. |
| лето Господне благоприятное / год Господень благоприятный [NEW] | Missing-vocabulary / comprehension gap, not primarily doctrinal: archaic Church-Slavonic-influenced лето means “year” in the Synodal idiom, but modern Russian лето means exclusively “summer.” A reader encountering “лето Господне” outside a Scripture-citation context risks a simple comprehension failure (reading “the Lord’s summer”), independent of any theological dispute. | Retain лето Господне благоприятное only in direct Scripture citation (matching reader expectation of the received Bible text); use год Господень благоприятный in all expository/teaching prose; gloss explicitly on first joint occurrence. |
| Новый завет (22:20) [NEW] | Book-title collision: “Новый Завет” is also the standard Russian name for the entire New Testament canon; readers may default to “the book” rather than “the covenant reality Jesus enacts at this meal.” | Require an explicit note distinguishing the covenant event from the canon’s title at every high-stakes teaching occurrence. |
| Сын Человеческий [NEW] | Under-communication, not crowding: plain Russian surface reading suggests emphasis on Christ’s humanity only, silently losing the Danielic authority-and-judgment background (Daniel 7:13-14) that the title actually foregrounds. | Explicit teaching at first major occurrence (5:24) surfacing the Danielic background; do not allow the title to accumulate meaning silently across 25+ occurrences without this anchor. |
| царь [NEW] | Deep tsarist-historical resonance (imperial monarchy, its violent 1917 overthrow, ongoing contemporary political symbolism around monarchist nostalgia in some Orthodox-nationalist circles). | Clarify at every occurrence (19:38; 23:2-3,37-38) that Jesus’ kingship is humble, non-political, and eschatological — neither an endorsement of historical monarchy nor a target for either nostalgia or anti-monarchist suspicion. |
| власть [NEW] | Strong civil/political-institutional Russian connotation (state power, historical authoritarianism); risk of reading Jesus’ authority as a this-worldly power claim, directly relevant to the later Rome/Herod tension (ch. 20, 23). | Clarify this is a unique, self-authenticating spiritual authority (over sickness, demons, sin, Sabbath), not a civil-political claim; this groundwork matters for later government/authority-sensitive material. |
7. The Cost and Joy of Discipleship
| Available Russian Terms | Weakness / Gap | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| ученик [NEW] | Under-communication gap: ordinary secular Russian ученик denotes primarily a school pupil under a teacher — an intellectual, relatively low-cost relationship. Luke’s usage (9:57-62; 14:25-33) demands total, costly, life-reordering allegiance far exceeding this register. | Repeated explicit restoration of the term’s full force at cost-of-discipleship passages; do not let the word’s everyday thinness silently under-translate the doctrine. |
| крест [NEW] | Crowded neighborhood: крест is deeply resonant in Russian devotional practice (крестное знамение, нательный крест worn daily by many, including secular/cultural Orthodox), but also lives as a worn secular idiom — “у каждого свой крест” (“everyone has their burden”) — a fatalistic, resigned-suffering cliché quite different from Luke’s specific, daily, voluntary, Christ-following call to self-denial (9:23). | Explicit note restoring the term’s original force against idiomatic drift into generic stoic endurance. |
| смирение [NEW] | Crowded but largely as an asset: deeply established Russian Orthodox ascetic-monastic virtue term (elders/старцы literature), risking narrowing into a technical ascetic-discipline register rather than Luke’s concrete, situational, social-reversal sense (Magnificat, banquet etiquette, the tax collector’s prayer). | Keep illustrations concrete and situational; do not let the term drift into monastic-technical abstraction alone. |
| управитель [NEW] | Low-medium risk; avoid менеджер (too commercial/casual). | Retain управитель; frame explicitly as accountability before God, not secular business management. |
| радость [NEW] | Low risk; ensure it is read as heaven’s joy over repentance, not merely human relief. | Minor expository emphasis sufficient. |
8. Jesus’ Compassion and Table Fellowship with Sinners
| Available Russian Terms | Weakness / Gap | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| сидеть / возлежать за одним столом; трапеза [NEW] | Missing cultural-practice gap: reclining together at a meal was a first-century marker of social acceptance, honor, and intimacy with no living equivalent practice in modern Russian culture; the social/purity scandal of Jesus dining with tax collectors and sinners (5:29-30; 7:36-50; 15:1-2; 19:1-10) cannot be inferred from the vocabulary alone — it is a fact about ancient social convention, not a translation choice per se. | Explicit historical-cultural teaching note required at first major occurrence (5:29-30); do not assume the scandal is self-evident from “eating together” language alone. |
| грешники [NEW] | Risk of softening into a vague, generic “everyone is a sinner” abstraction, losing the concrete social-outcast referent (tax collectors, the sinful woman) that gives the meal scenes their scandal. | Keep grounded in named social categories (мытари, блудница) rather than abstract theological generality. |
| мытарь [NEW] | Narrow recognition risk: modern readers typically know мытарь only via the parable title (“притча о мытаре и фарисее,” 18:9-14) as “the humble one,” losing the historical scandal of Roman tax-collaboration and presumed extortion/dishonesty. | Restore the historical-social scandal explicitly at first occurrence (3:12; 5:27-29), not only at the familiar parable. |
| сжалился / сострадание [NEW] | Under-communication gap: Luke’s strongest compassion-verb (σπλαγχνίζομαι) denotes a visceral, gut-level, involuntary movement; сжалился and especially the softer сострадание/жалость register risk flattening this into polite pity. | Use narrative-verb сжалился/умилосердился (not the weaker жалость) and supplement with expository description of the term’s visceral force at first occurrence (7:13). |
| ближний [NEW] | Crowded neighborhood: the phrase “добрый самарянин” has become a fully secularized Russian idiom for “any helpful stranger,” flattening the parable’s original ethnic-religious scandal (a despised Samaritan as hero) into generic feel-good moralism. | Explicit note restoring the original scandal; do not let cultural over-familiarity with the idiom substitute for the parable’s actual argument. |
| пир / ужин [NEW] | Low-medium risk; ensure the climactic image (servants sent to compel the poor, crippled, blind, lame to fill the table, 14:21-23) is not reduced to generic “hospitality” language. | Preserve the active, compelling, boundary-crossing outreach dimension in exposition. |
B. Missing Vocabulary vs. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods
B1. Genuine Missing Vocabulary (No Natural Single Russian Equivalent)
These are cases where Russian simply does not have a single term or fixed phrase covering the same semantic range as the Greek, requiring either a compound phrase, an explicit unifying teaching note, or acceptance of split registers with compensating exposition.
| Concept | Greek Root | Russian Split / Gap | Compensating Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jubilee release (forgiveness + social liberation) | ἄφεσις | Splits across прощение (sins), освобождение/свобода (captives/oppressed), отпустить (measured release) | Explicit unifying teaching note at 4:18-19 |
| Lost-ness (object, animal, person) | ἀπόλλυμι / ἀπολωλός | Splits across потерянная (thing/animal) and погибший (person, stronger/finality-implying) | Explicit note tying Luke 15’s three parables to one continuous thread; clarify non-finality of погибший in the son’s case |
| Visceral, gut-level compassion | σπλαγχνίζομαι | No single Russian verb carries the same bodily immediacy; сжалился/сострадание are comparatively cooler | Reinforce with narrative context and explicit exposition, not lexical substitution |
| Reclining-table social status marker | συνανάκειμαι / κατάκειμαι | No living Russian dining practice conveys the same honor/scandal signal | Explicit historical-cultural gloss, not a lexical fix |
| Ancient ethnic-religious rivalry (Jew-Samaritan) | Σαμαρίτης (contextual) | No native Russian analogy of comparable intensity | Explicit historical-cultural gloss |
| ”Year” sense of лето | ἐνιαυτόν (Isaiah 61:2 citation) | Modern Russian лето = “summer” only; archaic sense survives only in fixed Scripture idiom | Dual-register solution: retain in citation, gloss/replace in exposition |
B2. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods (Need Explicit Fencing)
These are cases where a serviceable, even correct, Russian term already exists but sits inside a semantic field dominated by a different concept — usually a Russian Orthodox sacramental/devotional category, a Soviet-era secularized idiom, or a live folk/occult category — such that the term will be silently pulled toward the wrong referent unless fenced with explicit teaching text.
| Russian Term | Correct Referent Here | Competing/Crowding Referent | Fencing Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| покаяние | Direct, unmediated personal turning to God | Sacramental Confession/Исповедь (priest-mediated, pre-Communion rite) | Explicit distinguishing note at every load-bearing occurrence — highest priority in this document |
| помазание | Jesus’ unique messianic consecration by the Spirit (4:18) | The sacrament of Chrismation (Миропомазание), administered to every baptized Orthodox believer | Explicit fencing note at first occurrence |
| ад | Luke 16’s intermediate-state ᾅδης | Final post-judgment hell (γέεννα) in popular usage | One clarifying note, not full systematization |
| крест | Daily, voluntary self-denial in following Christ (9:23) | Secular fatalistic idiom “у каждого свой крест” (resigned endurance of any life burden) | Explicit note restoring original force |
| ближний | The parable’s specific scandal (a despised outsider as moral hero) | Secularized idiom “добрый самарянин” for any helpful stranger | Explicit note restoring ethnic-religious scandal |
| смирение | Concrete, situational social reversal (Magnificat, banquet, publican’s prayer) | Technical ascetic-monastic virtue category (старцы literature) | Keep illustrations concrete; do not let term drift to pure ascesis |
| царь | Jesus’ humble, spiritual, eschatological kingship | Russian tsarist-imperial historical/political resonance, live monarchist-nostalgia currents in some circles | Explicit non-political framing at every occurrence |
| власть | Jesus’ unique spiritual authority | Civil/political-institutional state power | Explicit spiritual-not-civil framing |
| бес / демон | Personal, serious, malevolent spiritual agents defeated by Christ’s word | Post-Soviet folk-comic бес folklore and live экстрасенс/folk-healer culture | Maintain narrative seriousness; avoid horror or folkloric diction |
| Новый завет | The covenant reality inaugurated at the Last Supper | The New Testament canon (identical name) | Explicit distinguishing note |
| нищий | Concrete, unqualified economic destitution (6:20; 4:18) | Modern beggar-stereotype connotation; reflexive “poor in spirit” spiritualizing borrowed from Matthew’s more familiar Beatitudes | Anchor to concrete narrative illustration; forbid unqualified spiritualizing paraphrase |
| Спаситель | Christ’s decisive, historically anchored rescue | Folk-devotional protective-charm register (“Спаси и сохрани”) | Anchor to concrete narrative encounters |
| мытарь | Historically scandalous Roman-collaborator tax agent | Narrow “humble parable figure” association from 18:9-14 alone | Restore historical scandal at first occurrence |
C. Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions
| Term | Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Мессия | Transliterate (retain alongside Христос) | Established loanword; restores the etymological “Anointed One” sense the worn-smooth Христос no longer communicates on its own |
| Авва | Transliterate, paired with Отче | Matches existing Synodal/Romans 8:15 precedent exactly; preserves Aramaic intimacy the formal Отец alone under-communicates |
| маммона | Transliterate | Established loanword; no native Russian personification of wealth-as-rival-master carries equivalent force |
| осанна | Transliterate | Established liturgical loanword; strong cultural-liturgical asset, no ambiguity risk |
| синагога | Transliterate, with brief gloss | Clearly distinct from церковь/храм by form alone, but Second Temple institutional function needs a one-line gloss for low-OT-literacy readers |
| диавол / дьявол | Transliterate (native-established form) | No rival folk-concept confusion; well established across registers |
| помазал / помазание | Paraphrase (native Russian verb/noun), NOT transliterate a Greek “chrisma”-derived form | A transliteration would be unrecognizable and lose all resonance; the correct strategy is fencing the existing native term (see B2), not substituting a foreign-sounding alternative |
| лето Господне благоприятное | Retain archaic Synodal phrase in Scripture citation; paraphrase as год Господень благоприятный in exposition | This is a comprehension issue solvable only by dual-register handling, not by transliteration |
| Царство Божие | Native compound, no transliteration considered | Long-settled term; risk lies in political resonance, not in lexical form |
| Сын Человеческий | Native calque, no transliteration considered | Established rendering; risk lies in under-communicated background, not lexical form |
| крест | Native term, no transliteration considered | Deep devotional resonance is a genuine asset; the risk is idiomatic flattening, addressed through exposition, not lexical substitution |
| Аминь / аллилуия | Transliterate (per baseline precedent) | Established Synodal forms carried over automatically; no Luke-specific change needed |
General principle: transliteration is reserved for (a) proper names, (b) terms with no viable native Russian equivalent and an already-established loanword tradition (Мессия, маммона, осанна), and (c) terms whose intimacy or specificity would be lost by translation (Авва). Native paraphrase is preferred wherever a serviceable Russian term exists, even where that term requires fencing — introducing a foreign-sounding neologism to escape a crowded neighborhood (e.g., avoiding помазание) would create a worse problem: total unfamiliarity in place of a fenceable false association.
D. Ranked List of Highest-Risk Ambiguities
Ranked by combined doctrinal weight, likelihood of silent misreading, and centrality to the core passage and the eight curriculum doctrines.
-
покаяние (repentance) — sacramental-Confession absorption. The single highest risk in the entire Luke curriculum vocabulary. Affects the doctrine “Repentance and Forgiveness of Sins” at nearly every major turning point in the book (3:3,8; 5:32; 13:3,5; 15:7,10; 17:3-4; 24:47) and directly parallels the baseline’s already-Critical treatment of оправдание/благодать. Requires theologian-level review at every occurrence.
-
помазание/помазал (anointed, 4:18) — Chrismation-sacrament absorption. Occurs at the exact center of the core passage (Luke 4:16-21) and is the etymological ground of Мессия/Христос itself. A silent misread here compromises the entire curriculum’s central text.
-
ад/лоно Авраамово (16:22-23) — intermediate-state collapse into final hell. High risk because Russian ад’s default sense is already “final hell” in ordinary and popular-Orthodox usage; the parable’s actual point (moral/economic reversal) can be lost entirely if readers get stuck debating afterlife geography instead.
-
внутрь вас есть (17:21) — false closure of a genuinely open grammatical question. Risk is compounded (not merely doctrinal but exegetical): the Synodal wording’s accidental convergence with hesychastic inward-spirituality tradition could make one disputed reading appear to be the text’s only meaning.
-
лето Господне благоприятное — comprehension failure, not doctrinal dispute. Distinct in kind from the other entries: a reader with no prior exposure to the archaic Synodal idiom may simply fail to parse the phrase (default modern meaning “summer”), producing total communication breakdown rather than subtle theological drift. Direct core-passage relevance (4:19) elevates its priority despite its non-doctrinal nature.
-
Новый завет (22:20) — book-title collision. Risk of readers substituting “the New Testament [book]” for “the covenant Jesus enacts at this meal,” paralleling and intensifying the baseline’s Евангелие “book, not proclamation” caution.
-
грешники / мытарь / table-fellowship scandal — flattening of Luke’s central social-scandal argument. Compounding risk across three linked terms: if any one of сидеть/возлежать за столом, грешники, or мытарь is under-explained, the doctrine “Jesus’ Compassion and Table Fellowship with Sinners” loses its concrete force and becomes generic niceness.
-
ученик (disciple) — chronic under-translation via register mismatch. Not a single-occurrence risk but a cumulative one: because ученик’s everyday “school pupil” sense is so entrenched, every individual occurrence silently under-communicates cost unless repeatedly, explicitly corrected — a slow leak rather than a single puncture.
-
ἄφεσις-family split (4:18-19) — invisible unifying concept. Risk is structural: Luke’s Isaianic Jubilee unity (forgiveness = release = liberty, one reality) is architecturally invisible in Russian because the single Greek root necessarily fragments into прощение/освобождение/свобода/отпустить. Without an explicit unifying note, readers will never suspect these are meant to be heard as one thing.
-
крест (9:23) — idiomatic drift into secular fatalism. Risk is that the term’s very over-familiarity (devotional jewelry, common idiom) substitutes cultural resonance for actual comprehension of Luke’s specific, voluntary, daily call.
-
царь / власть (Kingdom doctrine, throughout) — political resonance overriding spiritual referent. Compounded risk given contemporary political sensitivity around monarchist nostalgia and state authority in Russian public discourse; requires the same non-polemical, pastoral framing the baseline already models for Romans 13’s government material.
-
Спаситель — folk-devotional flattening. Lower but real risk of drifting into a generic protective-helper reading disconnected from the specific historical rescue narratives Luke supplies.
-
самарянин / ближний — loss of ethnic-religious scandal via cultural over-familiarity. The Good Samaritan’s total secular naturalization into Russian idiom is a double-edged asset/risk: high recognition, low retained scandal.
-
σπλαγχνίζομαι (compassion) — under-communication via register-cooling. Lower-tier risk since the surrounding narrative (father running to the prodigal, Jesus stopping the funeral procession) largely carries the force even if the single verb underperforms.
-
мытарь — narrow parable-only recognition. Lowest-tier risk on this list; mostly a matter of restoring historical color rather than a live doctrinal collision, but still relevant to “Savior for All Nations” and table-fellowship doctrines.
End of Step 6 linguistic gap analysis. This document, together with the baseline Romans translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, and doctrine_risk_registry.json, supplies the rationale underlying analysis/07_semantic_analysis.md and analysis/08_core_glossary.md and must be treated as consistent with, not superseded by, those later Phase 1 artifacts.