Cross-Reference Analysis
Cross-Reference Analysis — 1 Corinthians (English → Cantonese)
Overview
1 Corinthians is Paul’s most pastorally occasional letter — written to resolve concrete disputes in a single congregation — yet it is saturated with Old Testament quotation, allusion, and typology, and it stands in close doctrinal proximity to Romans, the anchor curriculum for this Language Package. This document maps every Old Testament quotation and allusion, every messianic reference and typological pattern, and every substantive parallel to Romans (and to the wider Bible) across all sixteen chapters, first to last. Chapters with no direct OT quotation are noted explicitly as reviewed rather than silently omitted.
Because Cantonese Bible translation tradition (the Traditional-character Chinese Union Version, cross-checked against colloquial Hong Kong Protestant usage) already has an established rendering for nearly every OT passage quoted here, the governing rule is: reuse the established Cantonese OT-quotation wording wherever 1 Corinthians quotes a passage already rendered in the CUV tradition, and reuse the Romans Language Package’s rendering wherever 1 Corinthians and Romans share vocabulary, doctrine, or an identical quotation. New doctrinal-risk terms surfaced by these cross-references (e.g., δαιμόνιον/demons, εἰδωλόθυτον/idol-food, wisdom/σοφία) are documented in 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md and are referenced here by name only.
Section A — Explicit Old Testament Quotations (introduced by “it is written,” “the Scripture says,” or direct citation)
| # | 1 Corinthians passage | OT source (normalized citation) | Theme | Related character(s) | Translation sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 1 Corinthians 1:19 | Isaiah 29:14 | The Cross as Wisdom and Power — God confounds worldly wisdom | (none named) | 智慧/愚拙 pairing (see glossary); must preserve the paradox — God’s own act “destroys” human wisdom, not merely criticizes it. Use the established CUV rendering of Isaiah 29:14 for the quotation itself. |
| A2 | 1 Corinthians 1:31 | Jeremiah 9:24 | The Cross as Wisdom and Power; Grace excludes boasting | (none named) | Same quotation-family as 2 Corinthians 10:17; render 誇口 (boast) consistently with ch.13’s usage. Must connect to the baseline’s grace-versus-merit caution (Wong Tai Sin transactional framing) — boasting “in the Lord” is the opposite of boasting in one’s own religious merit or favor secured. |
| A3 | 1 Corinthians 2:9 | Isaiah 64:4 (loose composite quotation, possibly also drawing on Isaiah 65:17) | The Cross as Wisdom and Power — hidden wisdom now revealed by the Spirit | (none named) | Must not be rendered so as to suggest a fortune-teller’s or diviner’s hidden-knowledge claim (求籤, 睇相算命); this is Spirit-revealed truth, not privileged esoteric insight. |
| A4 | 1 Corinthians 2:16 | Isaiah 40:13 | The Cross as Wisdom and Power — believers share “the mind of Christ” | (none named) | 基督嘅心意 (mind of Christ); low risk, but keep distinct from a fortune-teller’s claim to discern hidden destiny. |
| A5 | 1 Corinthians 3:19 | Job 5:13 | The Cross as Wisdom and Power | (none named — Job’s friend Eliphaz, uncredited by Paul) | Low risk; reinforces 1:19/1:31 theme, use same 智慧 vocabulary. |
| A6 | 1 Corinthians 3:20 | Psalm 94:11 | The Cross as Wisdom and Power | (none named) | Low risk. |
| A7 | 1 Corinthians 5:13 | Deuteronomy 17:7 (also cf. Deuteronomy 13:5, 19:19, 22:21, 24:7 — the repeated “purge the evil from among you” formula) | Church Discipline and Holiness | (none named) | High — must be read as corporate community discipline aimed at restoration, not as a legal execution formula; distinguish from vigilante social shaming. |
| A8 | 1 Corinthians 9:9 | Deuteronomy 25:4 | Christian Liberty (ministers’ right to material support) | (none named) | Medium — an argument-from-lesser-to-greater (an ox’s needs argue for a minister’s needs); requires care so the Cantonese reader does not read this as a proof-text about animal welfare rather than ministry support. |
| A9 | 1 Corinthians 10:7 | Exodus 32:6 | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat; Israel’s Warning | Moses, Aaron, Israel (golden calf narrative) | Critical — direct historical instance of Israel’s idol-feast-and-revelry; requires Exodus 32 background explanation and connects directly to the Critical-risk 拜偶像/idolatry cluster (see Section C, D below). |
| A10 | 1 Corinthians 10:26 | Psalm 24:1 | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat — “the earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it” | (none named) | Medium — grounds the liberty to eat ordinary market meat; must not be read as licensing idol-temple participation itself (context distinguishes the two cases). |
| A11 | 1 Corinthians 14:21 | Isaiah 28:11-12 | Order in Worship — tongues as a sign to unbelievers | (none named — addressed to unfaithful Israel) | High — original context is a judgment-sign to unbelieving Israel; Paul repurposes it pastorally regarding tongues in worship; footnote should clarify the OT referent is a warning-sign, not primarily a positive endorsement of ecstatic speech. |
| A12 | 1 Corinthians 15:25 | Psalm 110:1 | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers — Christ’s reign until every enemy is subdued | David (author), Christ (fulfillment) | Critical — messianic enthronement psalm; the same psalm underlies “Lord” (κύριος) Christology broadly across the NT; must render consistently with any prior 主/Lord vocabulary from the Romans baseline. |
| A13 | 1 Corinthians 15:27 | Psalm 8:6 | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers — universal subjection under Christ | David (author), Christ (fulfillment); echoes Adam’s original dominion (Genesis 1:28) | High — connects creation-dominion (first Adam) to resurrection-dominion (last Adam); reinforces the 末後嘅亞當 typology entry. |
| A14 | 1 Corinthians 15:32 | Isaiah 22:13 (cf. Ecclesiastes 8:15) | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers — the futility of a no-resurrection ethic | (none named) | Medium — “let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die” is quoted as the logical (and bleak) conclusion IF there is no resurrection; must not be mistaken for Paul’s own counsel. |
| A15 | 1 Corinthians 15:45 | Genesis 2:7 | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers — first Adam / last Adam typology | Adam (first), Christ (last Adam) | Critical — foundational to the whole chapter’s representative-headship argument; 末後嘅亞當 rendering must be paired consistently with this Genesis quotation each time it recurs in teaching material. |
| A16 | 1 Corinthians 15:54 | Isaiah 25:8 | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers — death’s final defeat | (none named) | Critical — must retain “swallowed up in victory,” not a Buddhist-liberation register (解脫) or a folk “escaping fate” framing. |
| A17 | 1 Corinthians 15:55 | Hosea 13:14 | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers — “O death, where is your sting?” | (none named) | Critical — same paired quotation as A16; both must be rendered together with consistent victory/sting vocabulary (死嘅毒鉤, 勝利) per the glossary. |
Section B — Old Testament Allusions and Narrative Background (no direct quotation formula, but clear dependence)
| # | 1 Corinthians passage | OT background (normalized citation) | Theme | Related character(s) | Translation sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 1 Corinthians 5:7 | Exodus 12:1-13, 21-27 (Passover lamb) | Church Discipline and Holiness; typology of Christ | Moses, Israel in Egypt | Critical — “Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed” is a direct typological identification; requires Passover narrative background for a low-OT-literacy Cantonese audience; must not be diluted to a generic sacrifice metaphor. |
| B2 | 1 Corinthians 6:16 | Genesis 2:24 | Marriage and Singleness | Adam, Eve | High — direct quotation of the “one flesh” formula, applied here to warn against sexual immorality; must retain the Genesis marital-union background, not reduce to casual physical contact. |
| B3 | 1 Corinthians 7 (throughout) | Genesis 1:27-28; 2:18-24 (creation of marriage) | Marriage and Singleness | Adam, Eve | Medium — background assumption throughout the chapter that marriage is a good creation-ordinance, even as singleness is commended as a special calling; requires the reader to hold both truths without contradiction. |
| B4 | 1 Corinthians 8:4, 6 | Deuteronomy 6:4 (the Shema: “the LORD our God, the LORD is one”) | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat; Cross as Wisdom (implicit monotheism) | (none named) | Critical — “there is no God but one” and “for us there is one God, the Father… and one Lord, Jesus Christ” directly echoes and christologically expands the Shema; must be handled with care given Hong Kong’s religiously plural context (many-gods folk practice) — this is the doctrinal ground for rejecting all idol-worship, not merely a preference for one deity among many. |
| B5 | 1 Corinthians 10:1-4 | Exodus 13:17-14:31 (sea crossing); Exodus 16 (manna); Exodus 17:1-7 / Numbers 20:2-13 (water from the rock) | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat; typology | Moses, Israel | Critical — Israel’s wilderness experience is explicitly typological (“these things happened to them as an example,” 10:6, 11); “the Rock was Christ” (10:4) is a direct christological identification requiring careful typological (not literal-identity) framing. |
| B6 | 1 Corinthians 10:5 | Numbers 14:26-35 (wilderness deaths after unbelief) | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat — warning against presumption | Israel, Moses | High — grounds Paul’s warning that covenant privilege (baptism, spiritual food) does not guarantee immunity from judgment for continued sin; must not be read as contradicting assurance-of-salvation doctrine but as a pastoral warning against presumptuous sin. |
| B7 | 1 Corinthians 10:8 | Numbers 25:1-9 (Baal of Peor; sexual immorality and idolatry combined) | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat | Israel, Phinehas (background) | Critical — directly links sexual immorality with idol-feast participation, the same combination underlying the Corinthian idol-meat/porneia problem; strong live cultural analogue in temple-associated practices. |
| B8 | 1 Corinthians 10:9 | Numbers 21:4-9 (testing the LORD, the bronze serpent) | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat | Israel, Moses | High — “we must not test Christ/the Lord” (textual variant); requires background on the serpent-and-plague narrative. |
| B9 | 1 Corinthians 10:10 | Numbers 16:1-35 (Korah’s rebellion; “the destroyer”) | Church Discipline; Christian Liberty | Korah, Moses, Aaron | Medium — background narrative for “do not grumble”; low direct doctrinal risk but requires narrative context. |
| B10 | 1 Corinthians 10:20-21 | Deuteronomy 32:17 (Israel “sacrificed to demons”) | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat | (none named) | Critical — direct scriptural warrant for the δαιμόνιον/demons doctrine cluster flagged in 07_semantic_analysis.md; the OT itself, not merely Paul, identifies pagan sacrifice as demon-directed. This strengthens (rather than eases) the translation caution around Cantonese folk-ghost vocabulary. |
| B11 | 1 Corinthians 11:7-9 | Genesis 1:27; 2:18-23 | Order in Worship | Adam, Eve | High — background for the contested “head” (κεφαλή) passage; must be presented as background context alongside the passage’s genuinely disputed interpretation, not as settling the debate. |
| B12 | 1 Corinthians 11:25 | Jeremiah 31:31-34 (new covenant promise); Exodus 24:8 (covenant blood) | The Lord’s Supper | Moses (Exodus); Jeremiah (prophecy) | Critical — “new covenant” (新約) directly fulfills Jeremiah’s prophecy and echoes the Exodus covenant-blood ritual; requires both OT backgrounds for a full doctrinal grounding of the Lord’s Supper. |
| B13 | 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 | Leviticus 19:18 (“love your neighbor as yourself”) — thematic, not quoted | Love as the Greater Way | (none named) | Medium — thematic parallel only; Paul does not quote Leviticus 19:18 directly in ch.13 (contrast Romans 13:9, which does quote it explicitly), but the content overlaps; teaching materials may draw the connection without implying a direct citation. |
| B14 | 1 Corinthians 14:34 | Genesis 3:16 (background debated) / general Torah order-of-creation background | Order in Worship | Adam, Eve | High — the phrase “as the Law says” in 14:34 has no single agreed OT referent among interpreters; flag as an area of scholarly debate rather than assert a specific OT text unilaterally. |
| B15 | 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 | Isaiah 53:5-12 (Suffering Servant, died for sins); Psalm 16:8-11 (resurrection hope, “you will not abandon my soul to Sheol”) | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers | The Servant (Isaiah); David (Psalm 16, applied messianically) | Critical — “in accordance with the Scriptures” (15:3-4) is best read as summarizing this OT substructure; this is the single most important cross-reference cluster in the whole book, anchoring the core passage’s “of first importance” gospel summary. Must be handled identically in doctrine and teaching materials to how Romans handles Isaiah 53/Psalm 16 background (Romans does not quote these directly, but the same substitutionary-atonement and resurrection-hope doctrine underlies Romans 4:25 and 5:8; render consistently). |
Section C — Messianic References and Typology (summary table)
| # | Type figure / pattern | OT anchor | 1 Corinthians fulfillment passage | Theme | Rendering note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Passover lamb | Exodus 12 | 1 Corinthians 5:7 | Church Discipline and Holiness; Atonement | Christ as the once-for-all Passover sacrifice; keep 逾越節 (Passover) vocabulary paired with 基督 consistently. |
| C2 | The Rock in the wilderness | Exodus 17:6; Numbers 20:11 | 1 Corinthians 10:4 | Christian Liberty and Idol Meat | 磐石 (the Rock) = Christ, typologically; must not imply a literal stone was itself the pre-incarnate Christ in a crude sense — this is typological identification, consistent with how the baseline handles other OT type-figures. |
| C3 | Firstfruits offering | Leviticus 23:9-14 | 1 Corinthians 15:20, 23 | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers | 初熟嘅果子; requires OT harvest-offering background — Christ’s resurrection guarantees the full “harvest” of believers’ resurrection. |
| C4 | The last Adam | Genesis 1-3 (first Adam) | 1 Corinthians 15:21-22, 45-49 | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers | 末後嘅亞當; the book’s central representative-headship typology — reverses the first Adam’s death-bringing act. Direct doctrinal parallel to Romans 5:12-21 (“as in Adam… so in Christ”) — render with awareness that Romans 5 already establishes this Adam/Christ typology in the same Language Package family; keep Adam’s Cantonese name 亞當 (aa3 dong1) identical across both curricula. |
| C5 | Davidic royal enthronement | Psalm 110:1; Psalm 8:6 | 1 Corinthians 15:25, 27 | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers | Christ’s present reign and coming universal subjection of every enemy including death; consistent with the Romans baseline’s davidic_covenant and seed_of_david entries — reuse 大衛 (David) exactly. |
| C6 | Suffering Servant | Isaiah 53 | 1 Corinthians 15:3 (“died for our sins”) | The Resurrection of Christ and Believers; The Cross | Substitutionary atonement; must retain “for our sins” as substitutionary/representative, not merely exemplary suffering. |
| C7 | New covenant promise | Jeremiah 31:31-34 | 1 Corinthians 11:25 | The Lord’s Supper | 新約; reuses Romans baseline’s 約 (covenant) term with 新 prefixed; must be relational/blood-sealed, never a commercial contract (合約). |
Section D — Parallels to Romans and Other Curricula in this Language Package
| # | 1 Corinthians theme/passage | Romans parallel (normalized citation) | Shared doctrine | Rendering-consistency requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 1 Corinthians 12:3 (“Jesus is Lord”) | Romans 10:9-10 | Lordship of Christ / salvation confession | MANDATORY VERBATIM MATCH: 耶穌是主 — the Romans baseline explicitly requires cross-document identical rendering of this confession; 1 Corinthians 12:3 must use the exact same four-character string, unqualified. |
| D2 | 1 Corinthians 15:1-11 (gospel received/delivered, died for sins, raised, appeared) | Romans 1:1-4; 4:25; 6:4-11; 8:11 | Gospel content; Resurrection of Christ; Justification grounded in the resurrection | 福音, 復活, 罪 must all be identical to Romans TM. Note the shared “died for our sins… raised” summary structure; teaching materials should cross-reference Romans 4:25 explicitly. |
| D3 | 1 Corinthians 15:10 (“by the grace of God I am what I am… not I, but the grace of God”) | Romans 11:5-6; Romans 4:4-5 | Grace versus merit/works | 恩典 identical; this passage is an unusually strong positive illustration of the same grace-excludes-boasting doctrine flagged Critical in the Romans baseline (Wong Tai Sin transactional-favor caution). Recommend cross-referencing directly in teaching notes as a “grace in ministry” case study alongside Romans’ “grace in justification” case study. |
| D4 | 1 Corinthians 1:29, 31; 3:21; 4:7 (boasting excluded) | Romans 3:27; 4:2 | Grace excludes human boasting | 誇口 (boast) — new term for this curriculum, but doctrinally identical function to Romans’ grace/works contrast; keep the same theological framing (face/status culture caution) established in the baseline’s glory entry. |
| E5 (sic, continue D) | 1 Corinthians 12:12-27 (body of Christ, many members) | Romans 12:4-8 | Spiritual gifts; unity in diversity | 基督嘅身體, 屬靈恩賜 — 屬靈恩賜 is REUSED from Romans TM exactly; 基督嘅身體 is new to this curriculum but must be treated as the fuller development of the same image Romans introduces briefly. Gift lists differ (compare Romans 12:6-8 vs. 1 Corinthians 12:8-10, 28) — do not force identical gift-term translations where the Greek terms differ, but keep the governing image (身體/肢體) identical. |
| D6 | 1 Corinthians 8-10 (idol meat, conscience, liberty) | Romans 14:1-15:7 (weaker brother, food, days) | Christian liberty and love-limited freedom | Structural parallel: both passages address a disputable-practices conflict resolved by love limiting liberty. Cantonese teaching materials should note the parallel explicitly; however, 1 Corinthians’ concrete referent (idol-temple meat) is a sharper, more theologically loaded case than Romans’ more general dietary-scruple discussion, and requires its own Critical-risk vocabulary (偶像, 祭偶像之物, 拜偶像, 鬼魔) not present in the Romans TM. Do not collapse the two passages’ vocabulary into one shared term set. |
| D7 | 1 Corinthians 13 (love as the greater way) | Romans 12:9-10; Romans 13:8-10 | Love as fulfillment/goal of Christian life | 愛 (agapē) is new to this curriculum (Romans TM does not carry a standalone “love” entry). Recommend this curriculum’s 08_core_glossary 愛 entry be added retroactively as a cross-curriculum term so future Pauline-epistle curricula in this Language Package reuse it exactly. Romans 13:9 directly quotes Leviticus 19:18, which 1 Corinthians 13 echoes thematically without quoting — keep this distinction clear in teaching notes (see B13 above). |
| D8 | 1 Corinthians 6:19; 3:16 (temple of the Holy Spirit / temple of God) | Romans 8:9-11 (the Spirit dwells in you) | Indwelling of the Holy Spirit | Shared underlying doctrine (Spirit-indwelling) but 1 Corinthians expresses it with the temple (殿) metaphor, absent from Romans’ phrasing. New Critical-risk term 神嘅殿/聖靈嘅殿 must never use 廟 (folk temple), consistent with the baseline’s church/廟 prohibition, extended here to the individual-body and corporate-church temple metaphors. |
| D9 | 1 Corinthians 1:26-29 (calling of the socially unimpressive) | Romans 8:28-30; Romans 9:11-12 | Divine calling / election | 蒙召嘅, 呼召, 揀選 all REUSED from Romans TM exactly; same caution against 命中注定/八字注定 (astrology/fate) framing applies here as in Romans. |
| D10 | 1 Corinthians 5:1-13 (church discipline) | Romans 16:17 (watch out for those who cause divisions) — lighter parallel | Church discipline and holiness | Romans treats this theme only briefly; 1 Corinthians 5 is the fuller development. No direct terminological overlap requiring consistency beyond 教會 (church, REUSED) and 聖潔/成聖 (holy/sanctification, REUSED). |
| D11 | 1 Corinthians 9:24-27 (athletic imagery, disqualified) | (no direct Romans parallel; cf. Philippians 3:12-14, 2 Timothy 4:7-8 in the wider canon, outside this Language Package’s current scope) | Perseverance and ministry integrity | New imagery to this curriculum; flag 被棄絕 (disqualified) for careful framing so as not to contradict Romans 8’s assurance-of-salvation doctrine (see 07_semantic_analysis.md ch.9 note). |
| D12 | 1 Corinthians 11:23-26 (Lord’s Supper institution) | (no direct Romans parallel — Romans does not treat the Lord’s Supper) | The Lord’s Supper | Wholly new sacramental-doctrine territory for this Language Package; 聖餐, 記念, 新約, 唔配, 分辨主嘅身體 are all new Critical/High-risk terms requiring full risk-registry entries (see Step 2 extension of translation_memory.json). |
Section E — Rendering-Consistency Rules for Shared Quotations and Cross-Curriculum Terms
- “Jesus is Lord” (1 Corinthians 12:3 = Romans 10:9-10): Render 耶穌是主 verbatim in both curricula. No qualification, softening, or expansion permitted in either location.
- Adam / last Adam (1 Corinthians 15:21-22, 45-49; Romans 5:12-21): Use 亞當 (aa3 dong1) for “Adam” in both curricula; 末後嘅亞當 for “the last Adam” is unique to 1 Corinthians but must be introduced with an explicit forward/backward cross-reference note to Romans 5 wherever both passages are taught together.
- Grace (χάρις) contrasted with merit (1 Corinthians 15:10; 1:29,31; Romans 3:27; 4:2-5; 11:5-6): Always render 恩典 per the Romans TM; always preserve the contrast against transactional temple-vow exchange (Wong Tai Sin framing) established as Critical in the baseline, regardless of which curriculum the passage appears in.
- Covenant (διαθήκη) and new covenant (1 Corinthians 11:25; Romans 9:4, 11:27): 約 is REUSED from Romans TM exactly; 新約 (new covenant) is a new compound introduced by this curriculum and should be added to translation memory as a formal extension, not a standalone new entry, so future curricula treating Hebrews or the Last Supper narratives in the Gospels can reuse it without renegotiation.
- Firstfruits, temple, body of Christ, and other images unique to 1 Corinthians: these are NEW to the Language Package and have no Romans precedent to preserve; once rendered here, they become authoritative for all future curricula in this Language Package (e.g., a future Hebrews or Ephesians curriculum reusing 神嘅殿 or 基督嘅身體 must match this curriculum’s rendering exactly, per the baseline’s stated goal of vocabulary consistency “across all documents”).
- OT quotations shared in wording with any future Old Testament curriculum (e.g., a future Isaiah or Genesis curriculum) must use the same Cantonese OT-quotation wording established here, drawn from the Traditional-character CUV tradition, to avoid readers encountering two different Cantonese renderings of the same OT verse across different curricula in this Language Package.
- Typological identifications (Passover lamb, the Rock, last Adam, firstfruits): must always be flagged for human theologian review per the Critical-risk routing already established in
doctrine_risk_registry.json’s review-routing categories, since typology is a doctrinally sensitive interpretive move requiring careful “type/fulfillment,” not “literal identity,” framing in Cantonese.
Section F — Full-Book Coverage Confirmation
Every chapter of 1 Corinthians has been reviewed for OT quotation, allusion, messianic reference, typology, and Romans parallel content. The following chapters contain no direct Old Testament quotation or major typological pattern beyond what is noted above, and are recorded here as explicitly reviewed rather than silently omitted:
- Chapter 2 — covered above (A3, A4).
- Chapter 4 — reviewed: 4:6’s “as it is written” is a citation formula without an identifiable specific OT text attached in the immediate context; no further OT cross-reference beyond the general wisdom-versus-boasting theme already covered under Chapter 1/3 (A1-A6). No new cross-reference entry required.
- Chapter 6 — covered above (B2); remainder of chapter (lawsuits, 6:1-11) reviewed with no additional OT quotation found.
- Chapter 7 — covered above (B3); remainder of chapter (practical marriage counsel, 7:10-40) reviewed with no additional direct OT quotation found.
- Chapter 9 — covered above (A8); remainder of chapter (athletic imagery, 9:24-27) reviewed — Greco-Roman games imagery, not OT-derived.
- Chapter 12 — reviewed: no direct OT quotation; body-of-Christ imagery is Pauline-original (see D5/D9 above for Romans parallel).
- Chapter 13 — covered above (B13); no direct OT quotation, thematic parallel only.
- Chapter 14 — covered above (A11, B14); remainder reviewed with no further OT quotation found.
- Chapter 16 — reviewed: no OT quotation; 16:22’s Maranatha is an Aramaic liturgical formula (not an OT quotation) whose eschatological “come, Lord” longing broadly echoes Day-of-the-Lord expectation across the Prophets (e.g., Malachi 4:5, Zechariah 14) without quoting a specific verse; no dedicated cross-reference entry required beyond this note.
All sixteen chapters are therefore confirmed as reviewed for cross-reference content, with Chapters 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 11, and 15 carrying the heaviest concentration of load-bearing OT and typological material, consistent with the doctrinal weight these chapters carry in the curriculum (Cross as Wisdom, Church Discipline, Christian Liberty and Idol Meat, the Lord’s Supper, and the Resurrection).
Load this document alongside 07_semantic_analysis.md, 08_core_glossary.md, and the Romans baseline translation_memory.json/doctrine_risk_registry.json before proceeding to Phase 1 Step 4 (doctrine risk registry extension) and Phase 2 translation.