Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference and Theme Analysis — 1 John

Method Note

1 John, unlike Romans, contains almost no formula-introduced OT quotations (“as it is written,” “the Scripture says”). Its relationship to the Old Testament is carried almost entirely through allusion, motif, and typology — creation/light imagery, the Cain-and-Abel narrative named outright, sacrificial and Day-of-Atonement vocabulary, covenant-love language, and idol polemic. Translators must resist forcing an OT-quotation citation apparatus onto verses that are allusive rather than citational; the sensitivity notes below flag where the temptation to over-formalize (or, conversely, to miss the allusion entirely) is highest. Coverage below proceeds chapter by chapter through the whole letter (1–5), then adds a dedicated Messianic/Typology section and a dedicated Romans-parallel section, since Romans is the sibling curriculum in this Language Package and the two books share several theologically load-bearing terms and confessional formulas that must render identically.


Section A — Chapter-by-Chapter Cross-Reference Matrix

Chapter 1

PassageThemeRelated CharacterOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1 John 1:1Eternal pre-existence of the WordChrist (the Word)Genesis 1:1 (creation “beginning”); John 1:1, 14 (the Word)從起初 must echo, not compete with, John 1:1’s established Cantonese rendering; do not introduce a new phrase for “beginning” than the one already used in Cantonese Gospel-of-John tradition.
1 John 1:1-3Apostolic eyewitness testimony grounding the gospelThe apostles; ChristJohn 1:14 (“we have seen his glory”); John 20:27-29 (Thomas’s tangible encounter)見證 (testimony) must retain eyewitness/legal-attestation force, not slide into the commercial “testimonial” register (see 08 glossary).
1 John 1:3, 1:6-7Fellowship, vertical and horizontalGod the Father; Christ; fellow believersExodus 24:9-11 (covenant meal fellowship with God); Amos 3:3 (“can two walk together…”)團契 (baseline, Low risk) must be shown to cover BOTH senses here explicitly — with God and with one another — since the curriculum doctrine “Fellowship with God and One Another” depends on this double reference being visible in exposition, not just the bare term.
1 John 1:5”God is light” — God’s holy self-revealing natureGodGenesis 1:3-4 (God separates light from darkness); Psalm 27:1; Isaiah 60:1-3; John 1:4-5, 8:12光 (Critical, new term) — grammatically parallel anarthrous predicate to 4:8’s “God is love”; both statements must be rendered with the identical subject-predicate structure 神就是X so Cantonese readers see the two as a matched theological pair spanning the whole letter.
1 John 1:7-9Cleansing by Christ’s blood; confession of sinChrist; believersLeviticus 17:11 (“the blood makes atonement”); Exodus 24:8 (covenant blood); Psalm 32:5; Proverbs 28:13血 (blood) and 洗淨 (cleanse) both carry standing cautions (blood-oath brotherhood idiom; ritual purification idiom, see 08 glossary) — must be read together with 1:9’s 認罪 as one integrated cleansing-through-confession unit, not two unrelated rituals.
1 John 1:9God’s character guarantees forgivenessGodDeuteronomy 32:4 (God faithful and just); Psalm 89:14 (righteousness and justice as the foundation of God’s throath); Psalm 51 (David’s confession)信實同公義 renders πιστός καὶ δίκαιος; δίκαιος inherits the baseline’s Critical 義 caution — flag every occurrence for Human Theologian review per baseline routing.

Chapter 2

PassageThemeRelated CharacterOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1 John 2:1-2Christ our Advocate and PropitiationChrist; the FatherZechariah 3:1-5 (an accuser opposed by a defending angel); Job 16:19-21 (a heavenly witness/advocate); Leviticus 16 (Day of Atonement); Romans 8:34 (Christ interceding at God’s right hand)中保 (advocate) and 挽回祭 (propitiation) form a single legal-and-sacrificial unit; both must be taught together as Christ’s ongoing intercession resting on his completed atoning work — Critical, Human Theologian review required for both terms in the same segment.
1 John 2:2Universal scope of the propitiationChristIsaiah 53:6 (“the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all”); John 1:29 (“Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world”); Romans 3:23-25Ties directly to the baseline doctrine “universal_scope_of_gospel” (High risk in Romans registry) — the “whole world” language here must retain the same unqualified universality already required for Romans 3:23 and 10:12-13.
1 John 2:3-6Obedience as evidence of knowing GodChrist (as pattern)Deuteronomy 6:1-9 (covenant obedience); John 14:15, 21Parallels baseline’s “obedience_of_faith” caution: obedience flows from relationship already established, not from a debt still owed (avoid 還神還願 framing).
1 John 2:7-8The love command, old and newLeviticus 19:18 (“love your neighbor as yourself”); Deuteronomy 6:5; Matthew 22:37-39; John 13:34-35誡命/命令 (commandment) — the “old” commandment is Levitical; the “new” commandment is its Christ-fulfilled, cross-shaped intensification. Exposition must show continuity, not replacement, with the OT love command.
1 John 2:9-11Light/darkness as ethical categoriesIsaiah 9:2; Micah 7:8-9光/黑暗 pairing continues 1:5’s theme; must not be flattened into a merely moral “good vs. bad” metaphor divorced from God’s own nature as light.
1 John 2:12-14Assurance addressed to a spiritual family (children, fathers, young men)Joel 2:28 (generational address pattern); cf. Ephesians 6:1-4 household addressLow risk; standard familial address forms in Cantonese church literature apply.
1 John 2:15-17Do not love the worldJames 4:4; Matthew 6:24世界 here (kosmos as fallen system) must be visibly distinct from 4:9’s neutral “into the world” sense — see 07 semantic analysis note; do not use 江湖.
1 John 2:18-23Antichrist; denial of the Father and the SonThe antichrist(s)Daniel 7:25, 11:36 (the “little horn” who exalts himself and speaks against the Most High); 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4; Psalm 2:7 (the Son’s unique relationship to the Father, denied by antichrist teaching)敵基督 (Critical) — must connect explicitly to the baseline’s Critical “sonship_of_christ” and “deity_of_christ” doctrines: denying the Son IS the antichrist mark, not an unrelated heresy category.
1 John 2:20, 27The anointing that teachesThe Holy One (Christ or the Spirit)1 Samuel 16:13 (anointing of David); Isaiah 61:1 (“the Spirit of the Lord… has anointed me”); Psalm 45:7恩膏 — see 08 glossary; must not be rendered with the ritual-consecration term 開光.
1 John 2:28-29Confidence at Christ’s return; born of himChrist (at his coming)Malachi 3:1-2 (“who can stand when he appears?”); 1 Thessalonians 2:19坦然無懼 ties forward to 4:17’s identical phrase — render both occurrences identically to preserve the letter’s inclusio structure around confidence at judgment.

Chapter 3

PassageThemeRelated CharacterOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1 John 3:1-2Believers as God’s children now; future glorificationBelievers; God the FatherHosea 1:10 (“sons of the living God”); Romans 8:14-17, 29 (Spirit-led adoption and predestined conformity to Christ’s image); John 1:12神嘅兒女 (High) — see extensive note in 08 glossary distinguishing this organic new-birth term from Romans’ forensic 兒子嘅名分 (adoption). Both curricula must be taught as complementary, not competing, doctrines of sonship.
1 John 3:2”We shall be like him”ChristPsalm 17:15 (“I shall be satisfied, when I awake, with beholding your likeness”); 1 Corinthians 15:49; Romans 8:29 (“conformed to the image of his Son”)Direct doctrinal parallel to Romans 8:29’s glorification language — render the “likeness/image” concept consistently with any existing Romans-curriculum rendering of Romans 8:29 if available in a shared glossary; flag for cross-curriculum theologian check.
1 John 3:3-5Purification; Christ’s sinlessnessChrist; believersIsaiah 53:9 (“he had done no violence… no deceit in his mouth”); 2 Corinthians 5:21; Romans 8:3Reinforces 道成肉身 (incarnation, baseline Critical): the sinless one who appeared in the flesh, not a temporary manifestation-form.
1 John 3:8The devil’s works, destroyed by ChristThe devil; ChristGenesis 3:1-15, esp. 3:15 (the protoevangelium — the serpent’s head to be crushed); John 8:44魔鬼 (High) — this is the letter’s clearest typological link to the Genesis serpent; exposition should draw the Genesis 3:15 connection explicitly so readers see Christ’s incarnation and cross as the fulfillment of the first messianic promise, not an unrelated later development.
1 John 3:11-15Cain and Abel as the negative paradigm for brotherly loveCain; AbelGenesis 4:1-16 (direct narrative source); Hebrews 11:4; Jude 11This is the ONE explicit named-OT-character reference in 1 John. 該隱 (Cain) and 亞伯 (Abel) must use the same proper-name transliterations already established in Cantonese Genesis translation tradition (consistent with CUV Traditional-character forms); do not coin new transliterations.
1 John 3:16-18Christ’s self-giving love as the pattern for practical loveChristIsaiah 53:12 (“he poured out his soul”); John 10:11, 15; John 15:13; Romans 5:8; Deuteronomy 15:7-11 (care for the poor brother)3:16’s “laid down his life” must echo the same self-giving-love vocabulary used for God’s initiating love in 4:9-10, since both describe the same single redemptive act.
1 John 3:19-24Confidence of heart before God; keeping his commandments; the Spirit givenBelieversPsalm 139:23-24 (heart-searching before God); Romans 8:16 (Spirit bearing witness)心 (heart) as the seat of conscience parallels but is textually distinct from the Pauline conscience vocabulary in Romans 2:15; do not conflate the two into one technical term.

Chapter 4 (Non-Core Verses 4:1-6; Core Passage 4:7-21 fully treated in 07_semantic_analysis.md Part A)

PassageThemeRelated CharacterOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1 John 4:1-3Testing the spirits; confession of the incarnationFalse prophets; the Spirit of God/of errorDeuteronomy 13:1-3 (testing a prophet’s message against known truth); 1 Kings 22:19-23 (discerning true from false prophecy); John 1:14靈 (unqualified plural) requires supplied qualifiers throughout — see 08 glossary Critical entry. Deuteronomy 13 gives the OT root of the test-the-message principle, though the content of the test (confessing Christ’s incarnation) is distinctly Christological, not merely predictive-accuracy-based.
1 John 4:4-6Overcoming false teachers; spirit of truth vs. errorBelievers; false teachers2 Chronicles 32:7-8 (“with us is the LORD our God… greater is he who is with us”); John 14:17, 16:13勝過/得勝 first appears here (before its fuller development in 5:4-5); render identically both places.
1 John 4:9God sending his only SonGod the Father; Christ (獨生子)Genesis 22:2, 16 (Abraham’s “only son” Isaac, offered in type — LXX ἀγαπητός; the “beloved/only son” motif); John 3:16; Romans 8:32 (“he did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all”)Strong typological parallel: Isaac as Abraham’s uniquely-promised son offered on the altar prefigures God’s own uniquely-begotten Son given for the world. Romans 8:32 uses nearly identical “giving up the Son” language — the Cantonese rendering of “sent/gave his Son” across both curricula should use compatible verbs (差遣/賜下) so learners recognize the same theological event described from two angles.
1 John 4:10PropitiationChristLeviticus 16 (Day of Atonement); Isaiah 53:5-6; Romans 3:25See Section C below for full Romans-parallel rendering-consistency treatment.
1 John 4:12No one has seen GodGodExodus 33:20 (“you cannot see my face and live”); John 1:18; 1 Timothy 6:16God’s invisibility is an OT-rooted, not novel, claim; do not let the Cantonese rendering imply this is a surprising new revelation rather than a reaffirmed OT truth now resolved relationally through love and the Spirit’s witness.
1 John 4:17-18Confidence at judgment; fear cast out by loveBelieversMalachi 3:2 (“who can endure the day of his coming?”); Romans 8:1, 8:15 (no condemnation; not a spirit of fear but of adoption)Direct thematic parallel to Romans 8:1 and 8:15 — see Section C.
1 John 4:19-21Love God, love brother; command received from himBelieversLeviticus 19:18; Deuteronomy 7:7-8 (God’s prior, unearned love for Israel); Matthew 22:39; James 2:8-9Deuteronomy 7:7-8’s account of God loving Israel not because of merit but from his own initiative is the OT root of 4:19’s “he loved us first” — should be cited in teaching notes as the covenantal background for grace’s priority.

Chapter 5

PassageThemeRelated CharacterOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1 John 5:1Born of God; believing Jesus is the ChristBelieversJohn 1:12-13; John 3:3-8從神而生/重生 — see 08 glossary; keep consistent with usage at 2:29, 3:9, 4:7, 5:4, 5:18.
1 John 5:4-5Overcoming the world through faithBelieversJohn 16:33 (“I have overcome the world”)勝過/得勝 — render identically to 4:4 occurrence; avoid martial-combat framing (see 08 glossary).
1 John 5:6-8Threefold witness: Spirit, water, bloodChrist; the SpiritDeuteronomy 19:15 (legal principle: two or three witnesses establish a matter); John 19:34-35 (blood and water from Christ’s side); John 5:31-39 (multiple witnesses to Christ)見證/水同血 — the Deuteronomic two-or-three-witness legal principle is the OT structural root of this passage’s argument form; exposition should make the legal-testimony logic explicit so it is not misread as a mystical triad.
1 John 5:9-13God’s own testimony concerning the Son; eternal life given in the SonGod the Father; ChristPsalm 19:7-9 (the trustworthy testimony of the LORD); John 5:36-37; John 20:31見證 and 永生 converge here; 永生 must retain its Critical caution against Daoist immortality framing even in this testimony-heavy context.
1 John 5:14-15Confidence in prayer according to God’s willBelievers1 Kings 3:5-14 (Solomon’s prayer according to God’s will and purposes); John 14:13-14; Matthew 7:7-11坦然無懼 recurs a third time (2:28, 4:17, 5:14) — the letter’s confidence-refrain must be rendered identically at all three occurrences.
1 John 5:16-17Sin unto deathBelievers (sinning brother)Numbers 15:30-31 (deliberate, presumptuous sin); 1 Corinthians 11:30 (sickness/death from abuse of the Lord’s Supper, an NT parallel pastoral category)致死嘅罪 (High) — must be kept as a specific pastoral distinction, never generalized into 報應 (karmic retribution); see 08 glossary.
1 John 5:18-20Assurance: kept by God, knowing the true GodBelievers; God the Father; ChristJeremiah 10:10 (“the LORD is the true God, the living God”); John 17:3 (“this is eternal life, that they know you…”); Numbers 6:24-26 (priestly blessing of divine keeping)“The true God and eternal life” (5:20) directly echoes Jeremiah 10:10’s polemic against idols with a living God — sets up the immediate transition to 5:21’s idol command; the two verses should be exposited as one unit, not read as unrelated closing remarks.
1 John 5:21Keep yourselves from idolsBelieversExodus 20:3-4 (the first and second commandments); Psalm 115:4-8; Isaiah 44:9-20 (idol polemic); 1 Corinthians 10:14; 1 Thessalonians 1:9偶像 (Critical) — see extended double-collision note in 08 glossary (temple-idol referent vs. celebrity-idol referent). This closing command is the letter’s final application of the entire “God is light/God is love” argument: exclusive devotion to the true, living, self-revealing God.

Section B — Messianic References and Typology (Whole-Book Summary)

Type/Reference1 John PassageOT RootTypological/Messianic SignificanceTranslation Sensitivity
The eternal Word, active in creation, now incarnate1:1-3Genesis 1:1-3 (God’s creative Word); Psalm 33:6Christ is the same Word/agent through whom God spoke at creation, now historically manifested — continuity between creation and incarnation生命之道 must be taught as continuous with John 1:1, not a new coinage (see 08 glossary).
The serpent-crusher3:8Genesis 3:15 (protoevangelium)Christ’s incarnate mission is to “destroy the works of the devil” — the first messianic promise in Scripture finding its enactmentExposition should draw this link explicitly; 07/08’s caution against generic-demon framing for 魔鬼 applies with special force here.
The Isaac/only-son typology4:9Genesis 22:2, 16Abraham’s uniquely-loved son offered up prefigures the Father giving his uniquely-begotten SonSee Section A (4:9 row) and Section C (Romans 8:32 parallel) for rendering-consistency detail.
The Passover/atonement lamb2:2, 4:10 (via ἱλασμός)Leviticus 16 (Day of Atonement); Exodus 12 (Passover); Isaiah 53:5-7,10 (the Suffering Servant as guilt offering)Christ as the once-for-all atoning sacrifice fulfilling and superseding the entire OT sacrificial system挽回祭 must always be taught with reference to its OT sacrificial background, not as an isolated NT technical term with no history.
The anointed teacher/prophet2:20, 271 Samuel 16:13; Isaiah 61:1Believers share, through the Spirit, in the anointing pattern previously reserved for kings/prophets — corporate, Spirit-given discernment恩膏 must not be over-individualized into a special-elite gift; it is corporate to all believers who have received the Spirit.
The Davidic/eschatological “Son” denied by antichrist2:22-23Psalm 2:7 (“You are my Son”); 2 Samuel 7:14 (Davidic sonship promise)Antichrist teaching specifically denies the Father-Son relationship rooted in the Davidic and eternal-sonship promise-line already flagged Critical in the Romans baseline (davidic_covenant, sonship_of_christ)Reinforces cross-curriculum consistency: the same doctrinal core (Christ’s unique divine Sonship) is under direct denial in 1 John 2:22-23 as is affirmed in Romans 1:3-4.
The true God contrasted with idols5:20-21Jeremiah 10:10; Isaiah 44:6-20; Deuteronomy 6:4 (Shema)Christ identified with “the true God and eternal life” in direct continuity with OT monotheistic polemic against idolsTies 偶像 and 永生 together as the letter’s closing theological climax; do not treat 5:21 as a detached ethical add-on.

Section C — Parallels to Romans (Cross-Curriculum Rendering-Consistency)

Romans is the sibling curriculum already governed by this Language Package. Where 1 John and Romans describe the same theological reality using different Greek vocabulary or a different rhetorical angle, the Cantonese renderings must be chosen so that a learner moving between the two curricula recognizes the underlying unity rather than perceiving two unrelated teachings.

1 John PassageRomans PassageShared Theological RealityRendering-Consistency Rule
4:9-10 (“sent/gave his only Son”)Romans 8:32 (“did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all”)The Father’s initiative in giving the Son for sinnersUse compatible verbs for “sent/gave up” (差遣 / 賜下) across both curricula’s teaching materials; both must retain 神嘅兒子/神嘅獨生子 without abbreviation (baseline rule).
2:2, 4:10 (ἱλασμός, propitiation)Romans 3:25 (ἱλαστήριον, propitiation/mercy seat) — flagged in the baseline’s escalation rules as requiring identical Human Theologian reviewThe same doctrinal category: Christ himself as God’s own provided means of dealing with sin’s guilt and wrath, not a worshipper-initiated appeasementRecommend that any future retranslation of Romans 3:25 in this Language Package adopt 挽回祭 (already fixed for 1 John) rather than an independent coinage, so the two curricula’s atonement vocabulary matches exactly. Flag for Phase 2 cross-curriculum glossary reconciliation.
3:1-2 (τέκνα θεοῦ, “children of God”)Romans 8:14-17 (υἱοθεσία, “adoption,” 兒子嘅名分)Believers’ sonship/childhood status before GodKeep 神嘅兒女 (organic new-birth sense) and 兒子嘅名分 (forensic-legal placement sense) visibly distinct in exposition; teach as two complementary biblical pictures of the same standing, per 08 glossary note — never let one silently substitute for the other in cross-curriculum materials.
3:2 (“we shall be like him”)Romans 8:29 (“conformed to the image of his Son”)Future glorification/ChristlikenessUse a consistent Cantonese phrase for “conformed/made like” across both curricula if Romans 8:29 receives its own dedicated rendering in a future Language Package update; flag for reconciliation.
4:17-18 (confidence, fear cast out)Romans 8:1 (“no condemnation”), 8:15 (“not a spirit of slavery to fear but of adoption”)Assurance grounded in secure standing, not anxious dread of judgment坦然無懼 (1 John) and any future Romans 8:1/8:15 rendering should be checked for compatible register — both describe the same assurance doctrine (baseline: assurance_of_salvation, Critical/High).
4:19 (“he loved us first”)Romans 5:8 (“God shows his love for us in that… Christ died for us”)The directional priority of God’s love — God initiates, humanity respondsBoth passages use 愛 (1 John, new Critical term) in the identical doctrinal sense of unearned, initiating divine love; when Romans materials eventually render 5:8’s ἀγάπη-noun usage, verify no accidental drift toward the baseline Romans package’s existing caution against reciprocal-favor framing (grace, Critical).
5:1, 5:4-5 (“born of God… believes… overcomes”)Romans 10:9-10 (confession “Jesus is Lord” = the salvation confession)Both passages tie a specific confession about Christ’s identity to a settled, secure salvation status1 John’s confession-of-Christ vocabulary (承認/宣認, High) and Romans’ 耶穌是主 (Critical, verbatim-fixed by baseline) are structurally parallel confessional formulas; both require Human Theologian review routing whenever they appear, per baseline escalation rules.
2:15-17 (“do not love the world”)Romans 12:2 (“do not be conformed to this world”)Rejection of the present fallen order’s values世界 (1 John) should match whatever Cantonese rendering the Romans curriculum uses for κόσμος/αἰών in Romans 12:2, to preserve a single “world-system” vocabulary across curricula.
3:23 (“believe… and love”)Romans 1:5, 16:26 (“obedience of faith”)Faith and its inseparable behavioral fruit1 John’s love-as-evidence pairs with Romans’ obedience-as-fruit; both must avoid a merit-earning framing (baseline “obedience_of_faith” caution reused without modification for 1 John’s parallel commandment texts).
2:2 (“propitiation for the whole world”)Romans 3:23, 10:12-13 (universal accountability and universal offer)The gospel’s unqualified universal scopeBoth must retain fully unqualified “all/whole world” language; neither curriculum may soften toward a local/insider-outsider reading (baseline “universal_scope_of_gospel,” High).

Section D — Rendering-Consistency Rules for Shared Quotations and Motifs

  1. Genesis 22 / Romans 8:32 / 1 John 4:9 “only/beloved son” motif. Whenever teaching materials draw this typological line explicitly, use 獨生子 for Christ (never for Isaac, who should retain whatever Cantonese rendering — likely 獨生子 or 愛子 — the Genesis narrative already uses in the Traditional CUV tradition) so learners see the pattern without confusing the two “sons.”
  2. Cain and Abel (Genesis 4) proper names. 該隱 (Cain) and 亞伯 (Abel) must use the established Traditional-character Cantonese Bible transliterations; do not coin new forms for this curriculum.
  3. “God is light” (1:5) / “God is love” (4:8, 16). Both anarthrous predicate statements must use the identical grammatical pattern 神就是X in every occurrence, including the repetition at 4:16, so the letter’s structural inclusio is visible in Cantonese.
  4. 坦然無懼 (confidence) refrain (2:28, 4:17, 5:14). Render identically at all three occurrences; do not vary the phrase for stylistic variety, since the repetition is deliberate and doctrinally load-bearing (Assurance of Salvation).
  5. 見證 (testimony) across 1:1-2, 4:14, 5:6-11. Render identically throughout; never substitute the commercial-testimonial-flavored 見證分享.
  6. 靈 (spirit/spirits) qualifier rule (4:1-6). Every occurrence of unqualified “spirit(s)” in this passage requires a supplied Cantonese qualifier; this rule takes absolute priority over any stylistic preference for brevity.
  7. Propitiation vocabulary reconciliation with Romans 3:25. Until a formal Phase 2 cross-curriculum glossary merge occurs, translators working on either curriculum must flag any Romans 3:25 rendering decision to the 1 John team (and vice versa) so that 挽回祭 is not independently reinvented under a different Cantonese term for Romans.
  8. 兒子嘅名分 vs. 神嘅兒女 non-substitution rule. These two terms must never be used interchangeably across the two curricula’s shared teaching series (e.g., a combined Romans + 1 John discipleship course); each must be introduced with its own doctrinal frame every time it first appears in a given lesson.
  9. 偶像 double-sense disambiguation. Any lesson introducing 1 John 5:21 to a Hong Kong audience saturated with celebrity-idol (偶像歌手) media usage must include an explicit sentence-level disambiguation the first time the term is used in that lesson, per the 08 glossary note.

Full-Book Coverage Confirmation

All five chapters of 1 John have been surveyed above (Chapter 1: 1:1-9 reviewed in full; Chapter 2: 2:1-29 reviewed in full; Chapter 3: 3:1-24 reviewed in full; Chapter 4: 4:1-6 reviewed in full in this document, 4:7-21 reviewed in full in 07_semantic_analysis.md Part A; Chapter 5: 5:1-21 reviewed in full). No chapter or verse range was silently omitted; every verse range contributes at minimum a load-bearing OT/NT connection or a Romans-curriculum parallel recorded above.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words