Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis — 1 Corinthians (English → Hebrew)

Method and Scope

This analysis follows the conventions established in the baseline Romans Language Package. Every term already recorded in translation_memory.json (Romans) is reused exactly as recorded; this document does not re-litigate those choices but flags where 1 Corinthians puts the same term under new contextual pressure. New terms required by 1 Corinthians’ distinct subject matter (the cross as scandal, resurrection body, idol meat, the Lord’s Supper, tongues, marriage, love) are analyzed fresh and proposed for addition to translation memory in 08_core_glossary.md.

The core passage, 1 Corinthians 15:1-11, receives full verse-by-verse treatment. Every other chapter (1-14, the remainder of 15, and 16) receives chapter-level treatment of its load-bearing theological vocabulary. Chapters that introduce no new vocabulary beyond what has already been analyzed say so explicitly.


PART ONE: CORE PASSAGE — 1 Corinthians 15:1-11 (Verse-by-Verse)

15:1 — “Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which you also stand”

  • γνωρίζω (gnōrizō) — transliteration: gnōrizō; literal: “I make known”; semantic range: to reveal, to remind of something already known, to make certain; English variants: “I make known,” “I remind you,” “I declare to you.” Contextual meaning: Paul reopens a foundational teaching, not introducing new information — this is a recall to first principles. Hebrew rendering: מודיע אני / מזכיר אני (modi’a ani / mazkir ani). Risk: Low. No collision; standard Hebrew narrative verb.
  • εὐαγγέλιον (euangelion) — “gospel.” BASELINE REUSE: הבשורה (ha-besorah), Medium risk (see translation_memory.json). Note: this is the anchor verse of the entire chapter — Paul defines the gospel’s content in vv.3-5, so the qualifying content that follows must be read as inseparable from “ha-besorah” here; a Hebrew reader must not detach “besorah” from the specific resurrection content Paul is about to specify.
  • παραλαμβάνω (paralambanō) — literal: “to receive, take alongside”; semantic range: to receive a tradition handed down, to accept, to take into one’s charge; English variants: “received,” “accepted.” Contextual meaning: receiving a fixed apostolic tradition, paired with παραδίδωμι in v.3 (see below) — a technical transmission pair. Hebrew rendering: קיבלתם (kibaltem). Risk: Medium. Positive resonance with Rabbinic transmission language (kabbalah, “that which is received”) but must not be read as open-ended oral tradition subject to ongoing rabbinic-style development; this is a fixed, closed apostolic deposit.
  • ἑστήκατε (hestēkate) — literal: “you have stood, you stand (firm)”; semantic range: to stand firm, to be established, to persevere; English variants: “you stand,” “in which you stand firm.” Hebrew rendering: אתם עומדים (atem omdim). Risk: Low.

15:2 — “and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain”

  • σῴζω (sōzō) — “saved.” BASELINE REUSE: ישועה (yeshu’ah) as the noun form; here the verb “you are being saved” (present passive, ongoing) — render as אתם נושעים (atem noshaʿim), from the same root ישע. Risk: Critical (per baseline: yeshu’ah defaults toward corporate/national deliverance in Jewish thought). Here Paul explicitly ties present, ongoing salvation to holding fast to the resurrection gospel — reinforce the individual, present-tense sense against the corporate-eschatological default.
  • κατέχω (katechō) — literal: “to hold down, hold fast, retain”; semantic range: to grasp firmly, to keep possession of, to restrain; English variants: “hold fast,” “retain,” “keep firmly.” Hebrew rendering: מחזיקים (machzikim). Risk: Low.
  • πιστεύω (pisteuō) — “believed.” BASELINE REUSE: verb form of אמונה (emunah) — render as האמנתם (he’emantem). Risk: High (per baseline emunah note — praxis-oriented drift in Jewish usage). Here belief is specifically belief in the reported facts of the resurrection gospel (vv.3-5), not generalized piety.
  • κενός (kenos) — literal: “empty”; semantic range: without content, futile, to no purpose, in vain; English variants: “in vain,” “for nothing,” “empty.” Hebrew rendering: לשווא (la-shav). Risk: Low.

15:3 — “For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures”

  • παραδίδωμι (paradidōmi) — literal: “to hand over, deliver, transmit”; semantic range: to pass on a tradition, to entrust, (elsewhere) to betray/hand over to authorities; English variants: “delivered,” “handed on,” “passed down.” Contextual meaning: paired technical term with παραλαμβάνω (v.1) forming a fixed transmission formula — Paul is citing a pre-existing creedal tradition, likely among the earliest in the NT. Hebrew rendering: מסרתי (masarti), noun form מסורת (masoret). Risk: High. Genuine positive resource — mesorah/masoret is the very word for the chain of Rabbinic transmission (Pirkei Avot’s “Moshe received Torah from Sinai and handed it on…”). The risk is exactly the inverse of Romans’ “law” entry: here the collision is an asset if taught explicitly (apostolic tradition as a real, Sinai-like transmission chain), but must not be conflated with an open, still-developing Oral Torah process — this deposit is closed and complete in the apostolic generation.
  • ἐν πρώτοις (en prōtois) — literal: “among first things”; semantic range: of first importance, primarily, as a chief matter; English variants: “as of first importance,” “first of all,” “most importantly.” Hebrew rendering: בראש ובראשונה (be-rosh u-ve-rishonah). Risk: Low.
  • Χριστός (Christos) — “Christ.” BASELINE REUSE: משיח (Mashiach), Critical risk (see baseline “messiah” entry). Here used as a virtual proper name/title fused with the resurrection claim — reinforces that this Mashiach is specifically the crucified-and-risen one, the central point of contested Jewish-Christian messianic identification.
  • ἀπέθανεν (apethanen) — “died,” from ἀποθνήσκω. Literal: “to die off, die away”; semantic range: ordinary death, but here with sacrificial/vicarious force. Hebrew rendering: מת (met). Risk: Low standing alone, but see next entry for the doctrinally loaded phrase.
  • ὑπὲρ τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν ἡμῶν (hyper tōn hamartiōn hēmōn) — “for our sins.” κ ἁμαρτία = BASELINE REUSE: חטא (chet), High risk. The phrase as a whole names substitutionary atonement — new theological term needed: atonement — Hebrew rendering: כפרה (kapparah). Risk: Critical. Kapparah is the central Yom Kippur category (the Day of Atonement itself is Yom Ha-Kippurim) — a profound positive resource, but the conceptual leap from ritual/sacrificial kapparah (animal sacrifice, the scapegoat, the High Priest’s mediation) to a single historical person’s death functioning as final kapparah for all sin is the single largest doctrinal claim in the verse and must be taught explicitly, not assumed.
  • κατὰ τὰς γραφάς (kata tas graphas) — “according to the Scriptures.” New term: scriptures — Hebrew rendering: כתבי הקודש (kitvei ha-kodesh), NOT הכתובים (ha-ketuvim, which would collide with “Ketuvim,” the specific third division of the Tanakh canon — Writings — and wrongly narrow the reference). Risk: High. This phrase invokes the doctrine of Fulfillment of Prophecy (already Critical/High in the baseline doctrine registry); here it anchors both the death (Isaiah 53) and resurrection (Psalm 16; Hosea 6:2) to specific, contested messianic prooftexts.

15:4 — “that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures”

  • ἐτάφη (etaphē) — “was buried,” from θάπτω. Literal: “to bury.” Hebrew rendering: נקבר (nikbar). Risk: Low. Establishes the historical, bodily reality of death — relevant apologetic weight against docetic or purely “spiritual” readings.
  • ἐγήγερται (egēgertai) — “has been raised,” from ἐγείρω (perfect tense — a completed act with continuing effect). BASELINE REUSE: term resurrectionתחיית המתים (techiyat hametim), Critical risk. The verb form here specifically renders Christ’s own resurrection: הוא הוקם or, matching the doctrine registry’s specific phrase, קם לתחייה / תחיית המשיח (techiyat ha-Mashiach) for the doctrinal referent. Risk: Critical (per baseline: Judaism affirms general future resurrection as a Principle of Faith, but a Messiah who dies and is raised mid-mission, to return later, breaks the expected one-reign template — must be taught explicitly, not assumed self-evident).
  • τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρᾳ (tē tritē hēmera) — “on the third day.” Hebrew rendering: ביום השלישי (ba-yom ha-shlishi). Risk: Low, though note the Hosea 6:2 allusion (“on the third day he will raise us up”) worth flagging for teaching purposes, not translation risk.

15:5 — “and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve”

  • ὤφθη (ōphthē) — “he appeared,” from ὁράω (passive: “was seen by”). Literal: “was seen”; semantic range: to be seen, to appear, often of a divine or significant visual manifestation (used of theophanies in the LXX, e.g., Genesis 12:7). Hebrew rendering: נראה (nir’ah). Risk: Medium. This is the term underlying the entire eyewitness-testimony structure of vv.5-8; its LXX theophany resonance (“the LORD appeared to Abram”) lends real weight but should not be overstated into a claim of theophany per se — it establishes verifiable, embodied appearance to named individuals and groups.
  • Κηφᾷ (Kēphas) — “Cephas,” Peter’s Aramaic name (Kepha, “rock”). Hebrew rendering: כיפא (Keifa). Risk: Low. Proper name; note the wordplay with Matthew 16:18 is outside this passage’s scope but worth cross-referencing in teaching notes.
  • τοῖς δώδεκα (tois dōdeka) — “the twelve.” Hebrew rendering: שנים העשר (shneim ha-asar). Risk: Low.

15:6 — “Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep”

  • ἐπάνω πεντακοσίοις (epanō pentakosiois) — “more than five hundred.” Hebrew rendering: יותר מחמש מאות (yoter me-chamesh me’ot). Risk: Low. Notable as a specific, falsifiable eyewitness claim — apologetically significant, but not a translation risk.
  • ἐκοιμήθησαν (ekoimēthēsan) — “have fallen asleep,” from κοιμάω, a common NT euphemism for the death of believers. Literal: “to sleep, fall asleep.” Hebrew rendering: נרדמו (nirdemu) or ישנים (yesheinim, “those who sleep”). Risk: Medium. Genuine positive resource: biblical Hebrew already uses sleep-euphemisms for death (“he lay down with his fathers,” שכב עם אבותיו). The risk is under-teaching the resurrection-hope specifically attached to this NT sleep-euphemism (v.51-52 below; 1 Thessalonians 4) rather than treating it as a generic idiom for death.

15:7 — “Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles”

  • Ἰακώβῳ (Iakōbō) — “James” (the Lord’s brother, not the apostle James son of Zebedee). Hebrew rendering: יעקב (Ya’akov). Risk: Low, though the identical Hebrew name to the patriarch Jacob (also יעקב) may cause momentary reader confusion resolvable by context/footnote.
  • τοῖς ἀποστόλοις (tois apostolois) — “the apostles.” BASELINE REUSE: שליח / שליחים (shaliach / shlichim), Medium risk (see baseline “apostle” entry). Here “all the apostles” as a defined, closed group of resurrection witnesses beyond the Twelve — a slightly wider technical usage than 1:1’s individual apostolic calling; note this scope difference.

15:8 — “Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me”

  • ἔκτρωμα (ektrōma) — literal: “a miscarried or stillborn thing, an abnormal/untimely birth”; semantic range: harsh self-deprecating image — one born outside the normal, expected process; English variants: “one born last,” “one untimely born,” “an abortion” (older translations), “a miscarriage.” Contextual meaning: Paul’s shocking self-description as the last, least-expected, almost illegitimate recipient of a resurrection appearance — his conversion was abrupt and outside the normal pattern of a disciple’s formation with the earthly Jesus. Hebrew rendering: כפג נדחה (ke-pega nidcheh, “like a rejected/premature birth”) or more directly כנפל (ke-nefel, “like a stillborn”). Risk: Medium. No doctrinal collision, but the image is strong and potentially jarring in Hebrew (נפל carries its own weight); a translator’s note explaining Paul’s rhetorical self-abasement is advisable.

15:9 — “For I am the least of the apostles, unworthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God”

  • ἐλάχιστος (elachistos) — literal: “smallest, least”; superlative of “small.” Hebrew rendering: הקטן ביותר (ha-katan be-yoter) / הצעיר contextually הפחות (ha-pachut). Risk: Low.
  • ἱκανός (hikanos) — here negated: “not fit/worthy/sufficient.” Hebrew rendering (negated phrase): אינני כשיר (eineni kashir). Risk: Low.
  • ἐδίωξα (ediōxa) — “I persecuted,” from διώκω. Literal: “to pursue, chase, persecute.” Hebrew rendering: רדפתי (radafti). Risk: Medium. Historically weighty word given Paul’s biography (Saul the persecutor of the early Messianic community, cf. Acts 9) — no translation collision, but this verse is a significant point of contact for a Hebrew-speaking audience reflecting on Sha’ul of Tarsus’s own transformation.
  • τὴν ἐκκλησίαν τοῦ θεοῦ (tēn ekklēsian tou theou) — “the church of God.” BASELINE REUSE: קהילה (kehilah), Critical risk (see baseline “church” entry — never עדה). Here specifically “God’s kehilah” — reinforce the grafting-in, not-replacement framing per baseline instruction even in this early, pre-Gentile-mission biographical reference.

15:10 — “But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me was not in vain…”

  • χάριτι θεοῦ (chariti theou) — “by the grace of God.” BASELINE REUSE: חסד האלוהים (chesed ha-Elohim), Medium/High risk (see baseline “grace” entry). Note: here grace is credited as the entire explanatory cause of Paul’s apostolic identity and labor — a strong Pauline instance to anchor the “grace, not merit” theme.
  • ἐκοπίασα (ekopiasa) — “I labored/worked hard,” from κοπιάω. Literal: “to grow weary from labor, to toil.” Hebrew rendering: עמלתי (amalti). Risk: Low. Positive resonance with the Hebrew concept of amal (labor/toil), used positively of Torah study labor (ameilut Torah) — a genuine bridge for teaching diligent gospel labor as flowing from, not earning, grace.

15:11 — “Whether then it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed”

  • κηρύσσομεν (kēryssomen) — “we preach,” from κηρύσσω. Literal: “to herald, proclaim as a herald”; semantic range: authoritative public proclamation, not private teaching. New term: preach/proclaim — Hebrew rendering: מכריזים (makrizim) / קוראים בקול (kor’im be-kol). Risk: Medium. Distinguish from “teach” (למד/הורה) — this is heralding an announcement, matching besorah’s own force as news to be publicly declared, not a philosophy to be discussed.
  • ἐπιστεύσατε (episteusate) — “you believed.” BASELINE REUSE: verb form of אמונה, האמנתם (he’emantem). Risk: High (see v.2 note). The chapter’s entire argument in vv.12-58 depends on this belief including specifically the bodily resurrection content just rehearsed, not a generalized trust separable from that historical claim.

PART TWO: CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER STUDY OF THE WHOLE BOOK

Chapter 1 — Christian Unity versus Factionalism; The Cross as Wisdom and Power (introductory statement)

Term (Greek/translit)Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
σοφία (sophia)wisdomintellectual skill, philosophical insight, Greco-Roman rhetorical sophistication, OT wisdom (Proverbs)“wisdom”Paul contrasts human/Greek rhetorical wisdom with God’s wisdom revealed in the cross (1:17-25)חכמה (chochmah). Risk: Medium. Chochmah is a rich, positive OT category (Proverbs, Wisdom literature) — risk is that Paul’s ironic/negative use (“wisdom of this world,” 1:20) could be misread as devaluing chochmah itself rather than a specific worldly counterfeit of it.
μωρία (mōria)foolishness, follyfoolishness, absurdity, that which appears senseless”folly,” “foolishness”The cross appears as foolishness to those perishing but is God’s wisdom to the saved (1:18, 23)סכלות (sichlut). Risk: Low-Medium. No direct collision, but must retain the ironic force — this is perceived folly that is actually wisdom, not an endorsement of actual foolishness.
σταυρός (stauros)crossthe wooden execution stake/cross; by extension, Christ’s crucifixion as an event and message”the cross,” “cross of Christ”The central scandal and power of the gospel message (1:17-18)צלב (tzlav). Risk: CRITICAL. The cross as a physical/cultural symbol carries deep historical trauma for Hebrew-speaking Jewish readers — pogroms, forced conversions, and the Crusades were historically carried out under the sign of the cross. This is not merely a doctrinal collision but a cultural-historical wound; teaching must address this directly rather than assume the symbol reads neutrally, as it might for other language communities.
ἐσταυρωμένος (estaurōmenos)crucifiedthe state/fact of having been crucified”crucified,” “Christ crucified”1:23’s “Christ crucified” — the specific stumbling block to Jewish hearersנצלב (nitzlav). Risk: Critical, same grounds as above, compounded by direct juxtaposition with “Messiah” — “a crucified Messiah” was and remains the central point of Jewish-Christian dispute (cf. Deuteronomy 21:23, “cursed is everyone hung on a tree,” historically read by some as excluding a crucified figure from messianic candidacy). Must be taught with explicit reference to this interpretive history, not asserted as self-evident.
δύναμις (dynamis)powerstrength, capability, miraculous power”power""The power of God” manifest paradoxically through the cross’s apparent weakness (1:18, 24)כוח (koach) — general use; BASELINE REUSE convention from “power_of_God” applies (never גבורה, to avoid Kabbalistic sefirot association). Risk: Medium.
σκάνδαλον (skandalon)stumbling blocka trap-trigger, an obstacle causing one to trip or take offense”stumbling block,” “offense”The cross as a skandalon to Jewish hearers expecting a triumphant Messiah (1:23)מכשול (mikhshol). Risk: High. Mikhshol is the exact Levitical/Torah term for a stumbling block placed before the blind (Leviticus 19:14) — strong positive lexical fit, but the theological claim that the Messiah’s own death is this stumbling block is precisely the point of maximal friction and must be handled as such.
σχίσμα (schisma)division, schisma tear, split, rupture (used of torn cloth, Matthew 9:16)“division,” “quarreling,” “factions”The Corinthian party-spirit around Paul/Apollos/Cephas/Christ (1:10-12)פילוג / מחלוקת (pilug / machloket). Risk: Medium. Machloket has a nuanced positive use in Rabbinic literature (“machloket le-shem shamayim,” a dispute for the sake of Heaven) — risk that Paul’s condemnation of Corinthian division could be softened by that positive rabbinic category; clarify this is destructive partisan rivalry, not principled halakhic debate.
ἔρις (eris)strife, quarrelingcontention, rivalry, discord”strife,” “quarreling,” “jealousy”Named alongside schisma as evidence of Corinthian immaturity (1:11; cf. 3:3)מריבה (merivah). Risk: Low.
καύχησις / καυχάομαι (kauchēsis / kauchaomai)boastingto glory in, take pride in, exult”boast,” “boasting”1:29, 31 — “so that no one may boast… let him who boasts, boast in the Lord” (echoing Jeremiah 9:23-24)התפארות / להתפאר (hitpa’arut / le-hitpa’er). Risk: Low. Direct positive resonance with Jeremiah 9:23-24’s own Hebrew wording, worth citing explicitly in teaching notes.
βαπτίζω (baptizō)baptizeto dip, immerse”baptize,” “baptism”1:13-17 — factionalism expressed through pride over who baptized whom; introduces the practice that will recur through the book (10:2; 12:13; 15:29)טבילה (tevilah) / verb להיטבל (le-hitabel). Risk: High. Genuine positive resource — tevilah is the established word for ritual immersion (mikveh) — but this is precisely the risk: Christian baptism must be distinguished from repeatable ritual purification immersion; it is a single, unrepeated identification with Christ’s death and resurrection (cf. Romans 6, already in the baseline curriculum), not an ongoing purity practice.
Also present, reused without change: called (קרוא), calling (קריאה), saints/sanctified (קדושים/התקדשות — 1:2), fellowship (שותפות — 1:9), grace (חסד), church of God (קהילה), faith (אמונה), gospel (הבשורה — 1:17), Lord Jesus Christ (ישוע המשיח אדוננו).

Chapter 2 — The Cross as Wisdom and Power (continued): the Spirit reveals hidden wisdom

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
μυστήριον (mystērion)
mystery
a hidden thing now disclosed, a secret plan revealed to initiates
”mystery,” “secret”
God’s wisdom, “hidden,” now revealed through the Spirit (2:7-10)רז (raz), preferred over סוד (sod). Risk: Medium. Raz carries strong Danielic-biblical precedent (Daniel 2’s “raza,” the mystery of the dream) without Sod’s stronger Kabbalistic-mystical overtone (Sod as one of the four PaRDeS levels of interpretation); raz avoids importing an esoteric-mystical reading frame.
πνευματικός (pneumatikos)
spiritual
pertaining to the Spirit, spiritually discerning
”spiritual person,” “the one who is spiritual”
The Spirit-indwelt believer who can discern spiritual truth (2:13-15)רוחני (ruchani). Risk: Low.
ψυχικός (psychikos)
natural, soulish, unspiritual
pertaining to the natural soul/psyche apart from the Spirit
”natural person,” “unspiritual man”
The person without the Spirit who cannot receive spiritual truth (2:14)נפשי (nafshi) / אדם טבעי (adam tiv’i). Risk: Medium. No direct collision, but nafshi’s connection to nefesh (soul) in Jewish anthropology (which does not carry a negative “merely natural, Spirit-less” connotation on its own) requires the contrast with pneumatikos to be made explicit in surrounding phrasing, not assumed to be self-evidently negative.
νοῦς (nous)
mind
the faculty of reasoning, understanding, intent
”mind,” “understanding”
2:16, quoting Isaiah 40:13 — “we have the mind of Christ”מחשבה / דעת (machashavah / da’at). Risk: Medium. The claim to share “the mind of the Lord” (echoing Isaiah 40:13’s “who has known the mind of YHWH”) applied to believers collectively is a strong theological claim requiring care in framing — not that believers become omniscient, but that the Spirit grants true, Christ-shaped understanding.
ἀνακρίνω (anakrinō)
to examine, discern, judge
to investigate, scrutinize, evaluate
”discerns,” “judges,” “examines”
The spiritual person “discerns/judges all things” yet is himself not subject to such examination by the unspiritual (2:15)לבחון / להבחין (livchon / lehavchin). Risk: Low.

Chapter 3 — Christian Unity versus Factionalism (continued); Church Discipline and Holiness (introductory: the temple)

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
σαρκικός (sarkikos)
carnal, fleshly
belonging to the flesh, immature, worldly
”carnal,” “fleshly,” “of the flesh”
3:1-3 — the Corinthians behave “as mere men,” driven by jealousy and strife despite claiming spiritual maturityבשרי (basari). Risk: Medium. Distinct from the doctrinal “sin” entry (חטא) — this describes an immature moral-spiritual state, not sin’s guilt per se; keep distinct in teaching from the Adamic sin-nature discussion in Romans 5/7.
ναός (naos)
temple, sanctuary
specifically the inner sanctuary (distinct from the broader temple precinct, hieron); the dwelling place of deity
”temple,” “sanctuary”
3:16-17 — “you [plural, corporate] are God’s temple, and God’s Spirit dwells in you”היכל (heichal). Risk: High. Heichal is precisely the term for the Temple’s inner sanctuary in Jerusalem — the single most sacred structure in Jewish history and hope (its destruction mourned annually on Tisha B’Av; its rebuilding a live messianic expectation). Applying this language to the corporate church (and individually in 6:19) is a major theological claim — the Spirit’s presence is no longer localized to a physical structure — requiring explicit teaching, not assumption, and must be handled with sensitivity given ongoing Jewish longing for the physical Temple’s restoration.
οἰκοδομή / οἰκοδομέω (oikodomē / oikodomeō)
building; to build
construction; to build up, edify
”building,” “God’s building,” “build”
3:9-15 — the church as God’s building under construction, with each teacher’s work tested by fireבניין / לבנות (binyan / livnot). Risk: Low. First occurrence of a term that recurs as “edification” language in chs. 8, 10, 14.
πῦρ (pyr), δοκιμάζω (dokimazō)
fire; to test/prove
refining fire; to examine/test for genuineness
”fire will test,” “test,” “prove”
3:13 — ministers’ work will be tested/refined by fire on the Dayאש (בוחנת) / לבחון (esh (bochenet) / livchon). Risk: Low.
μισθός (misthos)
wages, reward
payment for labor, recompense
”reward,” “wages”
3:8, 14 — reward proportional to faithful labor, distinct from salvation itself which is not earned (cf. grace, ch.15 baseline framing)שכר / גמול (sachar / gemul). Risk: Medium. Must be carefully distinguished from justification/salvation-by-grace language (Romans 3-4, baseline) — this is post-salvation reward for faithful ministry, not the basis of right standing before God.

Chapter 4 — Christian Unity versus Factionalism (continued): apostolic stewardship

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
οἰκονόμος (oikonomos)
steward, household manager
one entrusted with managing another’s estate/household affairs
”steward,” “manager”
4:1-2 — apostles as stewards of “the mysteries of God,” entrusted, not owning, the messageסוכן (sochen). Risk: Medium. Standard Modern Hebrew word for agent/manager; low collision but requires the theological weight (entrusted with God’s own mysteries, accountable to God alone) to be built through context rather than assumed from the word alone.
ὑπηρέτης (hypēretēs)
servant, assistant
an under-rower, subordinate assistant
”servant,” “assistant”
4:1 — “servants of Christ,” a term of humble subordination distinct from δοῦλος (slave, ch.7/9/12)משרת (mesharet). Risk: Low.
κρίνω (krinō)
to judge
to evaluate, decide, pass judgment, condemn
”judge,” “condemn”
4:3-5 — Paul refuses human judgment of his ministry, deferring to the Lord’s future judgmentלשפוט / לדון (lishpot / la-dun). Risk: Low.

Chapter 5 — Church Discipline and Holiness

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
πορνεία (porneia)
sexual immorality
unlawful sexual relations broadly (fornication, incest, adultery)
“sexual immorality,” “fornication”
5:1 — the specific case of a man living with his father’s wife, requiring church disciplineזנות (zenut). Risk: Medium. Zenut is the established Torah-rooted term (cf. Leviticus 18-20’s prohibited unions); low lexical risk, but the corporate church-discipline response Paul demands (removal from the community) is the more significant point requiring teaching, distinct from the vocabulary itself.
ζύμη (zymē)
leaven, yeast
fermenting agent; figuratively, corrupting influence
”leaven,” “yeast”
5:6-8 — “purge out the old leaven” — moral corruption spreading through the community, applied metaphoricallyחמץ (chametz). Risk: High. Chametz-removal before Pesach is one of the most detailed, practiced halakhic observances in Jewish life. The metaphorical NT extension (purging moral leaven, i.e., sin, from the community) is textually rooted in the same Exodus imagery Paul explicitly invokes — a genuine positive resource — but risk lies in the reader either (a) over-literalizing to actual dietary chametz-removal, or (b) under-appreciating the seriousness Paul intends by the deliberate choice of this specific, weighty metaphor.
ἄζυμος (azymos)
unleavened
without yeast/leaven
”unleavened,” “unleavened bread”
5:7-8 — believers are to be “unleavened,” matching their identity as those for whom Christ has already been sacrificedמצה / בלי חמץ (matzah / bli chametz). Risk: High, same grounds as above — genuinely positive Passover resonance requiring deliberate teaching of the Christ-as-Passover-lamb typology (see next entry) rather than assumption.
πάσχα (pascha)
Passover
the Passover festival; the Passover lamb itself
”Passover,” “our Passover lamb”
5:7 — “For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed”פסח (Pesach). Risk: CRITICAL. Pesach is the central festival of Jewish national memory and identity (the Exodus, the Seder, the retelling “in every generation”). Applying the Passover-lamb typology to Yeshua’s death is a foundational, textually explicit NT claim (also 1 Peter 1:19, John 1:29, 19:36) and a genuine positive bridge for Messianic Jewish teaching — but for a general Hebrew-speaking readership this is among the highest-stakes typological claims in the epistle and must be taught with full care for its meaning within, not against, the Seder’s own themes of redemption from bondage.

Chapter 6 — Church Discipline and Holiness (continued); the body as temple

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
σῶμα (sōma)
body
the physical body; by extension, the corporate body of Christ (ch.12)
“body”
6:13-20 — the individual believer’s body is “for the Lord,” a temple of the Holy Spirit, not a vessel for porneiaגוף (guf). Risk: Medium. First major theological load-bearing use of a term that recurs constantly (chs. 10, 11, 12, 15). No lexical collision, but the specific claim that an individual’s ordinary physical body is itself sacred space (paired with ναός, temple, 6:19) needs consistent handling across all its recurrences.
ἀγοράζω (agorazō)
to buy, purchase
to acquire in the marketplace; used figuratively of purchase from slavery
”bought,” “bought with a price”
6:20 — “you were bought with a price,” grounding the ethical appeal to holiness in the fact of belonging to Anotherנקנה במחיר (nikneh be-mechir). Risk: Medium. Distinct from ge’ulah (redemption, deliberately kept separate from yeshu’ah per baseline “salvation” entry) — this is commercial purchase-language (echoing the ancient slave-manumission market), not covenantal ge’ulah language; keep the two registers distinct in teaching.
μέλος / μέλη (melos / melē)
member(s)
a bodily limb or organ; figuratively, a constituent part of a larger body
”members”
6:15 — “your bodies are members of Christ”; foundational for the body-of-Christ imagery fully developed in ch.12איברים (eivarim). Risk: Low.
μία σάρξ (mia sarx)
one flesh
a single physical/relational unity
”one flesh”
6:16, quoting Genesis 2:24 — sexual union creates a “one flesh” bond, the basis of Paul’s argument against porneiaבשר אחד (basar echad). Risk: Low. Direct citation of Genesis 2:24’s own Hebrew wording — strong positive resource requiring no adaptation.
ἀπολούω (apolouō)
to wash off, wash away
ritual or literal washing/cleansing
”washed”
6:11 — “you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified” — a tight triad summarizing conversionנרחצתם (nirchatzetem). Risk: Medium. Appears alongside BASELINE REUSE terms sanctification (התקדשות) and justification (ההצדקה, requiring the qualifying “by faith” phrase per baseline rule) — the three must be kept in their established forms and not smoothed into a single generic “cleansed” gloss.

Chapter 7 — Marriage and Singleness

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
γαμέω (gameō)
to marry
to enter into marriage
”marry,” “to be married”
Throughout ch.7 — Paul’s extended teaching balancing the goodness of marriage against the value of singleness for undivided devotionלהתחתן / לשאת אישה (lehitchaten / lasat ishah). Risk: Medium. No lexical collision, but the chapter’s elevation of singleness (“it is good for a man not to touch a woman,” 7:1; “I wish that all were as I myself am,” 7:7) sits in real tension with the strong, mitzvah-status Jewish emphasis on marriage and procreation (peru u-revu, Genesis 1:28) — this tension must be taught as Paul’s situational, eschatologically-motivated counsel (7:26, 29, 31), not a general devaluation of marriage as a good and commanded thing.
παρθένος (parthenos)
virgin
an unmarried woman (or, in some contexts, man) who has not had sexual relations
”virgin,” “the betrothed,” “unmarried woman”
7:25-38 — specific counsel to “virgins” regarding marriage in light of the present distressבתולה (betulah); masculine context also possible, פנוי (panui). Risk: Low-Medium.
ἄγαμος (agamos)
unmarried
without a spouse, single
”unmarried,” “the widowed and unmarried”
7:8, 11, 32-34 — the unmarried state as a context for undivided devotion to the Lordפנוי / פנויה (panui / panuyah). Risk: Low.
χωρίζω / ἀπολύω (chōrizō / apolyō)
to separate; to release, divorce
to separate a marriage bond; to dismiss/release
”separate,” “divorce”
7:10-15 — instructions on separation and divorce, including the “Pauline privilege” regarding an unbelieving spouseלהיפרד / גירושין (lehipared / gerushin). Risk: High. Halakhic divorce (get) is a formal, developed legal procedure in Jewish law with its own detailed requirements; Paul’s pastoral instructions here operate in a distinct register (apostolic ethical counsel to a mixed Jewish-Gentile congregation) and must not be presented as either superseding or equivalent to halakhic get procedure — the relationship between the two systems needs explicit teaching, not assumption of equivalence or of conflict.
ἐγκράτεια (egkrateia)
self-control
mastery over one’s own desires/impulses
”self-control”
7:9 — “if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry”שליטה עצמית (shlita atzmit). Risk: Low.
χάρισμα (charisma)
gift
a gift of grace, Spirit-given enablement
”gift”
7:7 — Paul describes both marriage and celibacy as forms of God-given charisma, distinct from but related to the term’s use in chs.12-14BASELINE REUSE — matanah root, cf. מתנות רוחניות (spiritual_gifts). Here rendered singular and more personal: מתנה (matanah), with note that context (a state of life, not a ministry enablement) differs from the ch.12-14 sense — flag for native speaker review to avoid conflating the two senses.

Chapter 8 — Christian Liberty and Idol Meat

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
εἴδωλον (eidōlon)
idol
an image, a false god represented by an image
”idol”
8:4-7 — “an idol has no real existence,” yet believers must weigh the effect of idol-associated food on othersאליל (elil). Risk: Medium. Elil is the standard, strongly negative Torah term (cf. Leviticus 19:4; Isaiah 2:8) — no lexical risk, but Paul’s nuanced argument (idols are nothing, yet eating idol-food can still wound a weak conscience) is more permissive than a blanket Torah-style avoidance-of-idolatry framing and needs careful teaching to avoid either flattening into pure prohibition or pure license.
εἰδωλόθυτον (eidōlothyton)
food sacrificed to idols
meat/food that has been ritually offered to an idol before being sold or served
”food offered to idols,” “meat sacrificed to idols”
Central subject of chs.8 and 10 — whether believers may eat such foodמאכל שנזבח לאלילים / זבחי אלילים (ma’akhal she-nizbach la-elilim / zivchei elilim). Risk: High. This is the chapter’s central practical-ethical question and has no exact parallel category in contemporary halakhah (which addresses kashrut on different grounds); the risk is that a Hebrew-speaking reader may import a strict kashrut-style “forbidden substance” framework onto Paul’s actually more nuanced, conscience-and-conduct-based argument (8:4-13; 10:25-30).
γνῶσις (gnōsis)
knowledge
understanding, insight; here specifically doctrinal knowledge that idols are nothing
”knowledge”
8:1-2 — “knowledge puffs up, but love builds up” — knowledge without love is insufficient and even dangerousדעת (da’at). Risk: Low.
συνείδησις (syneidēsis)
conscience
the inner faculty of moral self-awareness and judgment
”conscience”
8:7, 10, 12 — the “weak” conscience that may be wounded by observing a “knowledgeable” believer eating idol-foodמצפון (matzpun). Risk: Medium. A real but under-theologized category in classical Rabbinic ethics (which tends to center on external halakhic conduct more than an internal conscience-faculty as such); Paul’s argument that one must restrain one’s own liberty for the sake of another’s conscience is a genuinely distinct ethical move worth explicit teaching.
ἐξουσία (exousia)
right, authority
authority, permission, the right to act
”right,” “liberty,” “authority”
8:9; 9:4-18 — the “right” believers have that must sometimes be voluntarily set aside for love’s sakeזכות / סמכות (zchut / samchut), context-dependent. Risk: Medium.
ἀσθενής (asthenēs)
weak
lacking strength, frail; here of conscience specifically
”weak,” “weak brother”
8:7-12 — the believer whose conscience is not yet settled regarding idol-foodחלש (chalash). Risk: Low.

Chapter 9 — Christian Liberty (continued); apostolic self-restraint

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
στέφανος (stephanos)
crown, wreath
victor’s wreath awarded in athletic competition
”crown,” “wreath,” “prize”
9:25 — an imperishable crown contrasted with the athlete’s perishable oneעטרה (atarah). Risk: Low. Positive resonance with existing Jewish liturgical/poetic use of atarah (a crown of glory/Torah).
ἀγών / τρέχω (agōn / trechō)
contest, race; to run
athletic competition; to run in a race
”race,” “run”
9:24-27 — Paul’s athletic metaphor for disciplined gospel ministryמירוץ / לרוץ (merotz / larutz). Risk: Low.
ὑπωπιάζω (hypōpiazō)
to strike under the eye, to discipline severely
boxing metaphor: to give a black eye; figuratively, rigorous self-discipline
”discipline my body,” “buffet my body”
9:27 — Paul’s rigorous self-discipline to avoid disqualificationלרסן את גופי (le-rasen et gufi). Risk: Low.

Chapter 10 — Christian Liberty and Idol Meat (continued); Israel’s wilderness typology; the Lord’s Table

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
τύπος (typos)
type, pattern, example
a mold, pattern, or prefiguring example
”example,” “type,” “warning”
10:6, 11 — Israel’s wilderness generation as a typological warning for the churchדוגמה / אות מבשר (dugma / ot mevaser). Risk: Medium. This introduces biblical typology as an interpretive method applied directly to Israel’s own history — worth flagging that this is a distinctly Christian hermeneutical move (reading Israel’s story as pattern/warning for the church) that should be taught explicitly rather than assumed uncontroversial.
εἰδωλολατρία (eidōlolatria)
idolatry
worship of idols
”idolatry”
10:14 — “flee from idolatry,” summarizing the section’s practical exhortationעבודת אלילים (avodat elilim). Risk: Low. Strong, well-established, entirely positive-resonance Torah category (avodah zarah’s near-synonym) — no collision.
δαιμόνιον (daimonion)
demon
a malevolent spiritual being
”demons”
10:20-21 — pagan sacrifices are offered to demons, not merely to “nothing,” creating real spiritual danger in participationשדים (shedim). Risk: Medium. Shedim is an established biblical/Rabbinic category (Deuteronomy 32:17; Psalm 106:37), but folk-Jewish demonology (shedim in Talmudic and later folklore) differs somewhat in character/function from the NT’s demonic framework tied specifically to idol-worship and spiritual warfare; brief contextual clarification recommended.
ποτήριον κυρίου / τράπεζα κυρίου (potērion kyriou / trapeza kyriou)
cup of the Lord; table of the Lord
the cup and table associated with the Lord’s Supper, contrasted with pagan cultic meals
”the Lord’s cup,” “the Lord’s table”
10:21 — one cannot partake of both the Lord’s table and the table of demonsכוס האדון / שולחן האדון (kos ha-Adon / shulchan ha-Adon). Risk: High. First appearance of Lord’s Supper vocabulary developed fully in ch.11 (see below); the “Adon” component reuses the baseline’s Critical-risk lord rendering (אדון, echoing Adonai as the spoken substitute for the Tetragrammaton) — applying it to a shared cultic/covenantal meal requires the same care as the baseline’s Romans 10:9 handling.

Chapter 11 — Order in Worship (head coverings); The Lord’s Supper

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
κατακαλύπτω (katakalyptō) / κεφαλή (kephalē)
to cover down/over; head
to veil, cover the head; literal head; figuratively, source/authority
”cover her head”; “head” (of a person, of the relation between Christ, man, and woman)
11:2-16 — head covering practice and the theological argument from creation order about “headship”כיסוי ראש (kisui rosh); ראש / ראשות (rosh / rashut). Risk: High. Head-covering already exists as a live, well-known Jewish practice (married women’s hair-covering; men’s kippah) but for different halakhic reasons (modesty, mitzvah of covering before God) — risk that Paul’s argument (rooted in a creation-order headship argument, 11:3, 8-9) will be assimilated into the existing but distinct Jewish practice-rationale rather than engaged on its own textual grounds; requires explicit disambiguation.
κυριακὸν δεῖπνον (kyriakon deipnon)
the Lord’s Supper
the Lord’s own meal/supper
”the Lord’s Supper”
11:20 — naming the shared meal under discussionסעודת האדון (se’udat ha-Adon). Risk: Critical. Establishes the primary Hebrew term for the ordinance; see below for the doctrinally weightiest components.
σῶμα / αἷμα (sōma / haima)
body / blood
Christ’s body and blood, given and shed
”body,” “blood”
11:23-26 — “This is my body… this cup is the new covenant in my blood”גוף / דם (guf / dam). Risk: CRITICAL. This is among the highest-collision phrases in the entire epistle for a Hebrew-speaking, Torah-aware audience: the Torah’s blood-consumption prohibition is severe, explicit, and repeated (Leviticus 17:10-14; Genesis 9:4) — “you shall not eat the blood of any flesh.” Language of “drinking blood,” even understood symbolically/memorially by virtually all Christian traditions, requires the most deliberate, explicit teaching of the Lord’s Supper’s symbolic/memorial (not literal, not a violation of the blood prohibition) character, distinguishing it clearly from any implication of a literal blood-consumption ritual.
καινὴ διαθήκη (kainē diathēkē)
new covenant
a newly established covenant/relational bond
”new covenant”
11:25 — “this cup is the new covenant in my blood,” directly invoking Jeremiah 31:31ברית חדשה (brit chadashah). BASELINE REUSE of covenant term (ברית), High risk per baseline “covenant” entry. Jeremiah 31:31 is itself the source of this exact Hebrew phrase — a genuine positive textual anchor — but the claim that this new covenant is enacted specifically through Christ’s sacrificial blood, extended to uncircumcised Gentiles apart from Torah observance, remains (per baseline) “a live point of difficulty, not a foreign concept needing basic introduction.”
ἀνάμνησις (anamnēsis)
remembrance
a calling to mind, memorial
”remembrance,” “in remembrance of me”
11:24-25 — “do this in remembrance of me”זיכרון (zikaron). Risk: Medium. Positive resonance with the Passover Haggadah’s own memorial language and with Jewish liturgical zikaron generally — a real asset, but the specific referent (remembering Christ’s atoning death) must be made explicit, not assumed automatically transferable from Passover zikaron alone.
διακρίνω (diakrinō)
to discern, distinguish
to judge correctly, separate/distinguish between things
”discerning the body,” “without discerning the body”
11:29 — failure to discern the body brings judgment on the unworthy participantלהבחין (lehavchin). Risk: High. The phrase “discerning the body” is itself exegetically debated (the body of Christ sacramentally present, vs. the body as the gathered church community, cf. ch.12) — translators should preserve the ambiguity rather than resolve it toward one reading, and flag for theologian review.

Chapter 12 — Spiritual Gifts and the Body of Christ

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
χάρισμα / χαρίσματα (charisma / charismata)
gift(s)
grace-gift(s), Spirit-given enablement(s)
“spiritual gifts,” “gifts”
12:4-11 — the variety of Spirit-given gifts for building up the churchBASELINE REUSE: מתנות רוחניות (matanot ruchaniyot), Medium risk (see baseline entry).
φανέρωσις (phanerōsis)
manifestation
a making visible/evident
”manifestation”
12:7 — “to each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good”התגלות (hitgalut). Risk: Low. Distinct root from the baseline’s Critical-risk “incarnation” (התגלמות, hitgalmut) — no lexical collision, but ensure consistent spelling/distinction between the two terms across documents.
γλῶσσα / γλῶσσαι (glōssa / glōssai)
tongue(s)
literal tongue/language; a Spirit-given gift of speaking in an unlearned language/utterance
”tongues,” “speaking in tongues”
12:10, 28, 30; developed further in ch.14לשונות (leshonot). Risk: High. No lexical collision (leshonot is the plain word for “languages/tongues”), but the specific phenomenon (ecstatic or unlearned Spirit-given speech) is unfamiliar and needs careful framing so it is not read either as ordinary multilingual ability or as a merely psychological/emotional phenomenon.
ἑρμηνεία γλωσσῶν (hermēneia glōssōn)
interpretation of tongues
the accompanying gift of interpreting tongues-speech
”interpretation of tongues”
12:10, 30; ch.14’s requirement that tongues be interpreted in corporate worshipפירוש לשונות (peirush leshonot). Risk: Medium.
Ἕλλην (Hellēn)
Greek
a Greek, or by extension any Gentile
”Greek,” “Gentile”
12:13 — “whether Jews or Greeks” — used interchangeably with “Gentile” language elsewhere in Paulיווני (yevani). Risk: Medium. Distinct from the baseline’s גויים (goyim, “Gentiles”) — note this is an ethnic-specific term (Greeks specifically) sometimes standing in for the broader Gentile category; keep both available and context-sensitive.
δοῦλος / ἐλεύθερος (doulos / eleutheros)
slave; free person
one in bondage/servitude; one not enslaved
”slave,” “bondservant”; “free”
12:13 — “slave or free,” part of the baptismal unity formula (cf. Galatians 3:28)עבד / חופשי (eved / chofshi). Risk: Medium. Eved carries deep resonance with the Exodus narrative itself (Israel’s own bondage and liberation) — an asset for teaching the gospel’s liberating, unifying force across social status, provided the historical weight of the term is engaged rather than flattened into a merely sociological category.
ἰάματα (iamata)
healings
acts of healing
”healings,” “gifts of healing”
12:9, 28, 30רפואות (refu’ot). Risk: Low.
δυνάμεις (dynameis, pl.)
miracles, works of power
miraculous deeds
”miracles,” “workings of miracles”
12:10, 28-29נסים (nissim), deliberately preferred over גבורות (gevurot) per the baseline’s power_of_God convention avoiding Kabbalistic sefirot association. Risk: Medium.
σῶμα Χριστοῦ (sōma Christou)
body of Christ
the church as Christ’s corporate body, with believers as its members
”body of Christ,” “one body”
12:12-27 — the extended body metaphor: many members, one body, mutual interdependenceגוף המשיח (guf ha-Mashiach). Risk: High. Builds directly on ch.6’s individual-body temple language and must be held together with the baseline’s Critical-risk church entry (קהילה) — teach as an organic-unity metaphor consistent with Romans 11’s grafting-in framework, not a supersessionist replacement image.

Chapter 13 — Love as the Greater Way

| Term | Literal meaning | Semantic range | English variants | Contextual theological meaning | Hebrew rendering & risk | |---|---|---not applicable|---|---|---| | ἀγάπη (agapē) | love | selfless, committed, others-oriented love; distinct from erotic (erōs) or familial (philia) love in Greek usage | “love,” “charity” (older translations) | The entire chapter — love as superior to all spiritual gifts, defined by its qualities (patient, kind, not envious, etc.) | אהבה (ahavah). Risk: Medium. Ahavah is the standard, rich, positive Hebrew word (cf. the Shema’s “ve-ahavta,” Deuteronomy 6:5) — a genuine asset with deep covenantal resonance. The risk is the inverse of most entries in this glossary: because ahavah is used constantly in Modern Hebrew for romantic/casual affection, Paul’s specific, demanding, self-giving definition (13:4-7) can be diluted by the word’s everyday breadth unless the surrounding content (the definitional list itself) carries the theological weight. | | ἐλπίς (elpis) | hope | confident expectation, not mere wish | “hope” | 13:13 — “faith, hope, and love abide, these three” | תקווה (tikvah). Risk: Low. Positive resonance with Israel’s own national anthem (“Hatikvah”) and long history of hope-language — a genuine asset, though the specifically NT theological content (confident hope grounded in the resurrection, cf. ch.15) should be made explicit rather than assumed automatically read into the word. | | αἴνιγμα / ἔσοπτρον (ainigma / esoptron) | riddle; mirror | an obscure image; a dim/imperfect reflecting surface (ancient mirrors were polished metal, giving indistinct images) | “through a glass, darkly,” “in a mirror dimly,” “as in a riddle” | 13:12 — present, partial knowledge contrasted with future face-to-face knowledge | בראי, כחידה (be-mar’ah, ke-chidah). Risk: Low. | | πρόσωπον πρὸς πρόσωπον (prosōpon pros prosōpon) | face to face | direct, unmediated encounter | “face to face” | 13:12 — the eschatological hope of direct knowledge of God | פנים אל פנים (panim el panim). Risk: Low. Direct echo of Exodus 33:11’s description of Moses speaking with God “panim el panim” — a strong, positive intertextual resource. |

Chapter 14 — Order in Worship (tongues, prophecy, edification)

TermLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
οἰκοδομέω (oikodomeō)to build up, edifyto construct; figuratively, to strengthen/build up spiritually”build up,” “edify”14:3-5, 12, 17, 26 — the governing criterion for corporate worship practices: does it build up the church?לבנות (livnot); noun בנייה (bniyah). Risk: Low. First formalized here as the chapter’s central term, reusing the root introduced in ch.3’s building metaphor.
τάξις (taxis)orderorderly arrangement, sequence, proper arrangement”order,” “in order”14:40 — “let all things be done decently and in order”סדר (seder). Risk: Low. Positive resonance with the Passover Seder’s own name (meaning “order”) — a genuine, low-risk cultural bridge worth noting for teaching purposes.
σιγάω (sigaō)to be silentto keep silence, refrain from speaking”keep silent,” “remain silent”14:28, 30, 34 — instructions on order regarding tongues, prophecy, and (controversially) women’s speech in worshipלשתוק / דממה (lishtok / demamah). Risk: High. 14:34-35’s instructions regarding women are among the most exegetically contested passages in the epistle (textual-critical questions about the verses’ placement, and interpretive debate over scope — universal prescription vs. situational correction of specific disorder). Translators must render the plain sense accurately while flagging the passage for human theologian review given its contested status and pastoral sensitivity; this is a translation-fidelity issue, not a license to resolve the interpretive debate in translation.
Also reused without new analysis: tongues (לשונות), interpretation (פירוש), prophesy (verb form of navi root — BASELINE REUSE, cf. נביא/נבואה).

Chapter 15 — The Resurrection of Christ and Believers (15:12-58, beyond the core passage’s vv.1-11)

TermLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
ἀπαρχή (aparchē)firstfruitsthe first portion of a harvest, offered to God”firstfruits”15:20, 23 — “Christ the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep,” guaranteeing the believers’ own future resurrectionראשית הביכורים / ביכורים (reishit ha-bikurim / bikurim). Risk: Medium. Strong positive resonance with the Torah’s own bikurim offering (Deuteronomy 26; the festival of Shavuot) — a genuine asset, since firstfruits inherently guarantees more of the same harvest to come; the specific application to resurrection guarantee should be taught explicitly alongside the existing agricultural/liturgical association.
ὁ πρῶτος Ἀδάμ / ὁ ἔσχατος Ἀδάμ (ho prōtos Adam / ho eschatos Adam)the first Adam / the last AdamAdam as the head of humanity in death; Christ as the head of a new humanity in resurrection life”the first man Adam / the last Adam”15:21-22, 45-49 — federal-headship argument: as in Adam all die, so in Christ all are made aliveהאדם הראשון / האדם האחרון (ha-Adam ha-rishon / ha-Adam ha-acharon). Risk: High. Extends the same federal-headship collision already flagged as High/Critical in the baseline “sin” and “universal_human_accountability” entries — mainstream Jewish anthropology (yetzer hatov/yetzer hara, real moral freedom) does not default to an inherited corrupted nature transmitted through a single federal head; here the same structure is applied positively (Christ as a new federal head of resurrection life) and must be taught with the same explicit care.
σῶμα ψυχικόν / σῶμα πνευματικόν (sōma psychikon / sōma pneumatikon)natural/soulish body; spiritual bodythe present, mortal, Adam-patterned body; the future, transformed, resurrection body”natural body” / “spiritual body”15:44 — the resurrection body is not immaterial/non-bodily, but a transformed, Spirit-empowered physical bodyגוף נפשי / גוף רוחני (guf nafshi / guf ruchani). Risk: High. Critical to avoid two errors: (1) reading “spiritual body” as implying a non-physical, ghost-like existence (Paul explicitly affirms bodily continuity/transformation, not disembodiment) and (2) collapsing the distinction with the Rabbinic general-resurrection expectation without addressing the specific claim of bodily transformation into an imperishable mode, which goes beyond a simple future re-embodiment.
ἀφθαρσία (aphtharsia)incorruptionfreedom from decay, imperishability”incorruption,” “imperishable”15:42, 50, 53-54 — the resurrection body’s new quality of incorruptibilityאי-כליון (i-kelayon). Risk: Medium.
ἀθανασία (athanasia)immortalitydeathlessness”immortality”15:53-54 — “this mortal body must put on immortality”אלמוות (almavet). Risk: Medium. Almavet is a standard, well-understood Hebrew word; risk is conceptual rather than lexical — clarify this is bodily immortality through resurrection, not the disembodied soul-immortality more associated with Hellenistic philosophy.
σάλπιγξ (salpinx)trumpeta wind instrument used for signals, war, and cultic/liturgical announcement”trumpet,” “the last trumpet”15:52 — “at the last trumpet… the dead will be raised”שופר (shofar). Risk: Medium. Strong, genuinely positive resonance with the shofar’s own role in Jewish eschatological expectation (the shofar blasts of Rosh Hashanah and the anticipated “great shofar” of ingathering, Isaiah 27:13) — a real asset for teaching, though the specific NT sequence (resurrection at this trumpet) should be distinguished from, while related to, the broader Jewish eschatological shofar expectation.
κέντρον (kentron)stinga goad, sting (of an insect), point”sting”15:55-56, quoting Hosea 13:14 — “where, O death, is your sting?”עוקץ (oketz). Risk: Low. Direct citation of the Hosea text; low risk, strong positive intertextual anchor.
νῖκος (nikos)victorytriumph, conquest”victory”15:54, 57 — “death is swallowed up in victory… thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ”ניצחון (nitzachon). Risk: Low.
Also present: mystery (רז, reuse from ch.2 — 15:51), flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God (σὰρξ καὶ αἷμα — idiom for mortal, unglorified humanity; render literally as בשר ודם [basar va-dam], a standard existing Hebrew idiom for mortal humanity — Risk: Low, genuine positive lexical match), kingdom of God (BASELINE REUSE, מלכות האלוהים).

Chapter 16 — Closing: the collection, final greetings, and liturgical formulas

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningHebrew rendering & risk
λογία (logia)
collection
a fund gathered by contribution
”collection” (for the saints in Jerusalem)
16:1-4 — practical instructions for the collection supporting the Jerusalem believersמגבית (megbit). Risk: Medium. Megbit is the standard Modern Hebrew/Israeli word for a charitable fundraising campaign — a natural, low-friction fit; the risk is deliberately routing around the baseline’s flagged tzedakah (charity) drift risk (see baseline “righteousness” and “imputed_righteousness” entries) — megbit is preferred precisely because it does not touch the tzedek/tzedakah lexical family at all.
ἀνάθεμα (anathema)
accursed, devoted to destruction
something set apart under a curse/ban
”let him be accursed”
16:22 — “if anyone has no love for the Lord, let him be accursed”חרם (cherem). Risk: High. Cherem is a serious, historically weighty category in Jewish law (formal rabbinic excommunication/ban, e.g., the cherem pronounced against Spinoza) — a genuine positive lexical match for the force of Paul’s language, but its gravity means the verse’s specific object (lack of love for the Lord, in context of the resurrection gospel just expounded) must be clearly connected, not left as an isolated, free-floating severe pronouncement.
φίλημα ἅγιον (philēma hagion)
holy kiss
the customary greeting-kiss, practiced with sanctified intent among believers
”holy kiss”
16:20 — closing instruction for mutual greetingנשיקה קדושה (neshikah kedoshah). Risk: Low. Cultural-practice note only; no doctrinal collision.
Μαρανα θά (Marana tha)
“Our Lord, come!“
an Aramaic liturgical acclamation/prayer, preserved untranslated even in the Greek text
”Maranatha,” “Come, Lord!“
16:22 — an early, spontaneous liturgical formula expressing eager expectation of Christ’s returnPreserve as transliterated Aramaic per the baseline’s Abba convention: מרנא תא. Risk: Low-Medium. Like Abba, its power lies in its untranslated, intimate immediacy; render as a preserved loanword with a brief gloss rather than translating its sense into ordinary Hebrew, which would lose its liturgical, primitive-church character.

Summary Note on Coverage

Every chapter of 1 Corinthians (1-16) has been reviewed. Chapters with substantial new load-bearing vocabulary (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) are analyzed in full above. Chapter 4 is reviewed and contributes a smaller but genuine new-term set (steward, servant, judge) rather than being a pure reuse chapter. No chapter in 1 Corinthians was found to introduce zero new theological vocabulary; even chapters primarily reusing established terms (e.g., portions of chs. 9, 10, 14) contribute at least one load-bearing addition, as documented above.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words