Doctrine Analysis

This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.

Risk tier summary

Tier	Count	Review routing	Example doctrines
Critical	9	Human theologian, every occurrence	Sonship of Christ, Deity of Christ, Incarnation, Resurrection of Christ, Lordship of Christ, Salvation, Church as God’s People, Unity of Jews and Gentiles
High	16	Human theologian	Grace, Faith, Adoption, Sanctification, Davidic Covenant, Evangelism, Assurance of Salvation
Medium	12	Native speaker review	Apostleship, Sainthood, Peace with God, Spiritual Gifts, Kingdom Mission
Low	3	Automated review only	Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship

Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do

Hebrew’s nine Critical-risk doctrines fall into two distinct clusters, unlike the single-cause clustering seen in some other Language Packages. The first cluster (Sonship, Deity, Incarnation, Resurrection, Lordship of Christ, Messianic Promise) traces to the Tanakh’s and Rabbinic tradition’s own specific, textually-argued categories for God’s unity and the Messiah’s expected work — the reader’s objection is scripturally grounded, not merely cultural. The second cluster (Church as God’s People, Unity of Jews and Gentiles) traces to the historical weight of supersessionism and requires Romans 11’s grafting-in framework to be applied with unusual care.

Review routing rationale

Critical and High risk doctrines (25 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Hebrew is textually accurate and even Scripturally well-grounded without catching that it is grounded in the reader’s own tradition’s different conclusion. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is Modern Hebrew semantic drift or scope-calibration (corporate vs. individual) rather than outright doctrinal contradiction.