Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis
This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.
Risk tier summary
| Tier | Count | Review routing | Example doctrines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 9 | Human theologian, every occurrence | Salvation, Incarnation, Grace, Apostleship, Deity of Christ, Sonship of Christ, Resurrection of Christ, Lordship of Christ, Messianic Promise |
| High | 20 | Human theologian | Gospel, Divine Calling, Faith, Sanctification, Providence, Universal Scope of the Gospel, Unity of Jews and Gentiles |
| Medium | 8 | Native speaker review | Prayer and Intercession, Spiritual Gifts, Mission to the Nations, Evangelism, Church as God’s People, Kingdom Mission |
| Low | 3 | Automated review only | Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship |
Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do, and why the count is higher here
Kashmiri has nine Critical-risk doctrines, the highest count in this pipeline, because its two comparative-religion traditions each contribute their own distinct flashpoints rather than sharing one. Sonship, Deity of Christ, and Resurrection are Critical because they directly contradict specific, well-articulated, already-answered positions in mainstream Islamic theology (Tawhid, Quran 112, Quran 4:157). Salvation and Grace are Critical because they must be defended against two separate wrong frames at once — Islamic deeds-weighing mercy and Trika’s shaktipat/pratyabhijna self-realization. Apostleship, unusually promoted from its normal Medium tier elsewhere in this pipeline, is Critical here specifically because رسول is reserved for Muhammad’s title in mainstream Islamic usage.
Review routing rationale
Critical and High risk doctrines (29 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Kashmiri is fluent without catching that a shared word (Injil, Masih, Ruh al-Qudus, rasul) carries an already-settled, different meaning in Islamic theology, or that a term reads naturally to a Trika-shaped Pandit reader precisely because it borrows the wrong non-dualist framework. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is cultural and political sensitivity (e.g. mission framing, kingdom language given the region’s contested-sovereignty history) rather than doctrinal contradiction.