Linguistic Gap Analysis — 2 Thessalonians (English → Italian)

Purpose and Method

This artifact executes PRD Phase 1 Step 8 for the 2 Thessalonians curriculum. It identifies where the Italian destination language has no ready-made vocabulary for a doctrine (a gap requiring paraphrase or a new compound), where it has too much competing vocabulary (a crowded semantic neighborhood requiring fencing so readers land on the correct sense), and which choices between transliteration and paraphrase carry doctrinal weight. It closes with a ranked list of this letter’s highest-risk ambiguities for Phase 2 review routing.

This analysis extends, and does not contradict, the baseline Romans Language Package. Every REUSED term retains its baseline rendering, risk tier, and rationale exactly. All NEW terms introduced here follow the baseline’s risk-tier definitions and escalation conventions.

Full-Book Coverage Statement

All three chapters of 2 Thessalonians were reviewed for load-bearing vocabulary and doctrinal gaps, per the mandate that the core passage (2:1–12) anchors but never limits scope.

Chapter	Coverage status	Notes
2 Thessalonians 1	New terms contributed	Perseverance/affliction vocabulary (PUP), righteous judgment/vengeance/eternal destruction vocabulary (GRJ), calling/glorification-in-the-saints nuance (GEN, reused terms with new context), Kingdom of God linked to present suffering (reused term, new nuance). See Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix below.
2 Thessalonians 2:1–12	Core passage — full analysis	Day of the Lord, Parousia, Man of Lawlessness, Son of Destruction, the Lawless One, Mystery of Lawlessness, Apostasy, the Restrainer, Temple, Epiphaneia, energeia/false signs, Love of the Truth, the Lie, believing the Lie, working of delusion, judgment/condemnation. Anchors DOTL, MOL, GRJ.
2 Thessalonians 2:13–17	New terms contributed	Election/“chosen as firstfruits” nuance, sanctification genitive ambiguity, standing firm/traditions introduced at 2:15 (SFT anchor verse), Lord of Peace title, comfort/establish vocabulary.
2 Thessalonians 3:1–5	New terms contributed	Ordinary mutual prayer (distinct from Romans 8 intercession), Lord’s faithfulness, guarding from the evil one, love/perseverance pairing.
2 Thessalonians 3:6–15	New terms contributed	Second and final “tradition” occurrence (3:6, SFT anchor), walking in idleness, busybody wordplay, admonishment, apostolic command register, work-ethic instruction as an extension of “tradition.”
2 Thessalonians 3:16–18	Reviewed — no new doctrinal terms	Closing benediction reuses “pace,” “Signore,” and introduces the authenticating-sign convention (σημεῖον, low risk, non-theological, flagged only to prevent confusion with 2:9’s “signs and wonders”). No further gap-analysis action required beyond the note already captured in the Core Glossary (row 38).

No chapter was silently omitted; each is accounted for either with new vocabulary analysis or an explicit “reviewed, no new terms” note.

---

1. Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix

For each of the five curriculum doctrines: available Italian terms, their weaknesses, and the recommended strategy.

1.1 The Day of the Lord (DOTL)

Available Italian terms	Weakness	Recommended strategy
”il giorno del Signore” (direct calque)	Low collision as a phrase, but readers have no OT prophetic frame to hang it on; risk is under-determination, not false-friend collision.	Adopt as primary rendering (matches prior_output registry). Mandatory accompanying doctrinal framing (OT day-of-judgment/vindication background) at every occurrence, not lexical substitution.
”la fine del mondo”	Italian pop-culture default for any apocalyptic scenario (disaster films, secular “doomsday” talk); flattens the day to generic catastrophe, loses the vindication-for-the-persecuted half of the doctrine (1:6–10).	Reject as a translation; permitted only as a contrastive teaching note (“non semplicemente ‘la fine del mondo’, ma…”).
“l’Apocalisse”	Culturally loaded toward the book of Revelation and secular usage (“apocalisse nucleare,” “scenario apocalittico”); risks genre confusion with Revelation’s imagery, which this letter does not use.	Avoid as a rendering of “Day of the Lord” itself; reserve strictly for actual references to the Apocalypse/Revelation if they arise elsewhere in the curriculum.
Jehovah’s Witness “last days” vocabulary (culturally salient in Italy given the group’s high public visibility — door-to-door presence, Kingdom Halls, Watchtower literature)	Readers may unconsciously import a specific, datable, sectarian chronology distinct from Paul’s own emphasis (2:1–2 explicitly rejects a claim that the day has already come).	Explicit teaching-note disambiguation recommended for Phase 2/3 pedagogical materials, distinguishing Paul’s open, imminence-without-datability stance from any fixed sectarian timetable.

Verdict: No true vocabulary gap — “il giorno del Signore” is available and stable — but a significant framing gap: the phrase alone under-delivers the OT judgment/vindication content for a low-OT-literacy readership. Strategy: retain the phrase, invest teaching-note effort, not lexical substitution.

1.2 The Man of Lawlessness (MOL)

Available Italian terms	Weakness	Recommended strategy
”l’uomo del peccato” (ἁμαρτίας variant)	Collides directly with the baseline’s fixed “peccato” = ἁμαρτία (Romans), erasing the sin/lawlessness lexical distinction the curriculum needs; also reflects a minority textual variant, not the critical text.	Forbidden substitution. Never use.
”l’uomo dell’iniquità” (ἀνομίας)	“Iniquità” is a real but somewhat elevated/literary register word in modern Italian (more common in liturgical/legal-moral register than everyday speech); mild readability cost.	Accept the register cost deliberately: it buys a distinct, traceable lexical family (iniquità/iniquo) not shared with any baseline term, essential for tracking a single figure across 2:3, 7, 8.
”l’anticristo”	Widely known term (1 John), but NOT used by Paul here and imports Johannine associations (and popular/eschatological-thriller-fiction associations) not present in this text.	Permitted only as a cross-reference note connecting this figure to the broader NT antichrist tradition — never as the primary rendering of ἄνθρωπος τῆς ἀνομίας itself.
”il figlio della perdizione”	None significant; matches the established Italian rendering of the same phrase for Judas (John 17:12), a genuine asset.	Adopt; leverage the intertextual echo explicitly in teaching notes.

Verdict: No missing vocabulary, but a crowded neighborhood around “anticristo,” which must be fenced off from the primary rendering while still being available as a cross-reference.

1.3 Perseverance under Persecution (PUP)

Available Italian terms	Weakness	Recommended strategy
”perseveranza”	Strong Catholic catechetical association with “perseveranza finale” (final perseverance), a live Tridentine-era debate about merit, grace-cooperation, and the possibility of losing final salvation.	Retain the term (no better alternative exists) but frame explicitly in teaching notes as Spirit-enabled endurance under external persecution, not as an entry point into the final-perseverance merit debate.
”resistenza”	Carries an extremely strong 20th-century Italian civil/political resonance (“la Resistenza” = the WWII anti-Fascist partisan resistance movement), a national historical memory of enormous weight.	Avoid as primary rendering — the political-historical resonance would recast NT persecution-endurance as a political resistance movement, a serious category error, though the cultural memory of courage under oppression may be a useful illustrative bridge in supplementary teaching material only, clearly labeled as illustrative, not translational.
”sopportazione”	Register drifts toward passive toleration/putting-up-with, weaker than the active, hope-fueled endurance ὑπομονή conveys.	Reject as primary rendering; may appear in paraphrase glosses only alongside “perseveranza.”

Verdict: No gap; the correct term (“perseveranza”) already exists but sits in a crowded neighborhood next to a major, unrelated national-historical term (“resistenza”) and a Tridentine doctrinal debate. Fencing via teaching notes is required, not lexical substitution.

1.4 God’s Righteous Judgment (GRJ)

Available Italian terms	Weakness	Recommended strategy
”giudizio” / “giusto giudizio di Dio”	None doctrinally — here the courtroom/retributive resonance of Italian judicial vocabulary is correct, the reverse of the baseline Romans caution against over-legal readings of “giustizia.”	Adopt directly; explicitly flag for reviewers moving between curricula that the direction of caution reverses here (see Ranked Ambiguities §4 below).
“vendetta” (ἐκδίκησις)	Very strong Italian cultural loading toward personal/clan/mafia-genre revenge cycles (“vendetta familiare,” “faida”), especially salient in Southern Italian cultural memory and heavily reinforced by popular film/television.	Retain (established CEI rendering, and no viable substitute conveys the judicial-retribution sense as directly) but mandate theologian-level framing distinguishing God’s exclusive, judicial prerogative of vendetta from human vendetta-cycles — cf. the intertextual echo of Romans 12:19, already in the baseline package, which explicitly prohibits human vendetta. This creates a valuable teachable contrast rather than a pure liability.
”condanna” / “condannati” (κρίνω)	None significant; correct judicial register.	Adopt directly.
”castigo” / “punizione”	Both available as near-synonyms for retribution but lack ἐκδίκησις’s specific legal-prerogative nuance (a wronged party’s right to redress) and read more generically as punishment for wrongdoing in the abstract.	Avoid as primary renderings of ἐκδίκησις specifically; acceptable only as generic glosses for “eternal destruction” (ὄλεθρος αἰώνιος) if variety is needed in surrounding prose.

Verdict: No gap. This is the one doctrine in the curriculum where standard Italian judicial/retributive vocabulary is doctrinally welcome rather than doctrinally risky — but “vendetta” sits in an unusually crowded and culturally loaded neighborhood (mafia-genre revenge) requiring careful fencing.

1.5 Standing Firm in the Traditions (SFT)

Available Italian terms	Weakness	Recommended strategy
”tradizione” / “tradizioni” (παράδοσις)	THE single highest-sensitivity term in this curriculum. Italian “tradizione” in religious register is anchored to the Catholic doctrine of Sacred Tradition (Trent; Dei Verbum), an authoritative source of revelation alongside Scripture, transmitted through the Magisterium — a live, active doctrinal category in contemporary Italian Catholicism, not a historical relic. Waldensian/evangelical sola scriptura tradition reads the identical verses (2:15, 3:6) as referring only to first-century apostolic teaching now fully contained in Scripture.	No viable substitute exists that would not sound evasive (e.g., “insegnamento” loses the “handed-down, received, kept” nuance of παράδοσις and would itself need justification as a deviation from established Bible-translation convention). Retain “tradizione”/“tradizioni.” Mandatory theologian review at every occurrence, with a fixed explanatory note distinguishing first-century apostolic paradosis (spoken and written, closed with the apostolic era) from later Magisterial Sacred Tradition (an ongoing, open category in Catholic doctrine). This note must accompany 2:15 and 3:6 identically for consistency.
”insegnamento”	Softer, more neutral, avoids the Catholic/Protestant flashpoint but under-translates παράδοσις’s specific “received and to-be-transmitted” sense (which is precisely why Catholic apologetics fastens onto these verses) — using it would look evasive to reviewers on both sides.	Reject as primary rendering; may appear only as a clarifying gloss (“la tradizione, cioè l’insegnamento ricevuto dagli apostoli”).
“state fermi” / “tenete fermamente” (στήκετε/κρατεῖτε)	“Tenete” alone risks a passive, weak register.	Always pair with “fermamente”/“fermi”; never leave bare.

Verdict: No lexical gap, but the highest-stakes fencing requirement in the entire curriculum: “tradizione” must be actively, repeatedly disambiguated between two live, opposed, contemporary Italian doctrinal communities every time it appears, rather than fenced once and left alone.

---

2. Missing Vocabulary vs. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods

2.1 Genuine gaps (no ready Italian equivalent; paraphrase/compound required)

Concept	Gap description	Resolution
τὸ κατέχον / ὁ κατέχων (“the Restrainer”)	Italian has no single noun for an underdetermined-referent “restraining thing/one.” A bare noun choice (e.g. “il freno,” “il limite”) would either sound colloquial/mechanical or force a premature identification.	Paraphrase with a relative clause: “ciò che trattiene” (neuter) / “colui che trattiene” (masculine), preserving the Greek’s own grammatical shift and interpretive openness. Mandatory footnote presenting the range of historic proposals (Roman Empire, human government, gospel proclamation, Michael, Holy Spirit/church, God’s restraint).
ἐπισυναγωγή (“gathering together”)	No single Italian noun captures “the final eschatological gathering to Christ” without either sounding like a routine assembly (“adunanza,” “riunione” bare) or importing ekklesia-adjacent institutional overtones.	Paraphrase: “la nostra riunione con lui,” explicitly anchored to the parousia context so it is not misread as a regular church meeting.
αἱρέομαι / ἀπαρχή textual-variant phrase (“chosen as firstfruits”/“chosen from the beginning”)	Italian has adequate vocabulary for each half (“scegliere,” “primizie,” “dall’inizio”) but no single fixed phrase; the underlying Greek textual variant itself is unsettled.	Paraphrase with footnoted variant: “Dio vi ha scelti come primizie per la salvezza” (favoring ἀπαρχήν) with a note on the ἀπ’ ἀρχῆς alternative (“dall’inizio”).
περιεργάζομαι (“busybody,” Greek pun on ἐργάζομαι/“work”)	Italian has good functional equivalents for “meddling” (“immischiarsi negli affari altrui,” “impiccioni”) but no word that visibly puns on “lavorare” (to work) the way the Greek puns on ἐργάζομαι.	Accept the loss of wordplay; flag with a translator’s note so the letter’s ironic connection between refusing to work and meddling instead is explained rather than shown.

2.2 Crowded semantic neighborhoods (term exists but competes with strong rival senses)

Italian term	Competing sense(s) crowding the neighborhood	Fencing strategy
”mistero” (μυστήριον τῆς ἀνομίας)	Dominant positive liturgical sense: “i misteri del Rosario,” “il mistero della fede” (spoken at every Mass) — sacred, joyful, Christ-centered.	NEVER leave “mistero” bare; always bind to “dell’iniquità.” Consider an explicit teaching-note contrast: “non un mistero sacro, ma un mistero di male."
"epifania” (ἐπιφάνεια)	Dominant cultural sense: the January 6th holiday, “la Befana,” a beloved children’s folk holiday — positive, festive, wholly unrelated.	Do not use the noun “epifania” at all; render as “manifestazione."
"energia” (ἐνέργεια)	Dominant contemporary sense in Italy’s substantial New Age/esoteric subculture: impersonal cosmic force (“energie universali,” “energia positiva/negativa”).	Never use any form of “energia” for Satan’s/lawlessness’s ἐνέργεια; use “azione/attività/influsso” to preserve personal, morally culpable agency.
”apostasia”	Dominant technical sense in Catholic canon law: formal juridical renunciation of Catholic faith/baptism, a defined disciplinary category.	Retain the word (established Bible-translation term) but always accompany with a note distinguishing Paul’s cosmic-scale eschatological falling-away from the narrower canonical-defection sense.
”vendetta” (ἐκδίκησις)	Dominant cultural sense: personal/clan/mafia-genre revenge cycles.	Retain but frame explicitly as God’s exclusive judicial prerogative, contrasted with (and echoing) Romans 12:19’s prohibition of human vendetta.
”tradizione” (παράδοσις)	Dominant sense: Catholic Sacred Tradition (Magisterium-transmitted, alongside Scripture) — a genuinely competing theological neighbor, not merely a secular distraction.	Highest-priority fencing item in this curriculum; mandatory theologian review and fixed disambiguating note at every occurrence.
”perseveranza”	Competing sense: Tridentine “perseveranza finale” merit/cooperation debate.	Frame as Spirit-enabled endurance under persecution specifically; avoid unqualified statements about final salvation security phrased so as to sound like a settled position in that debate.
”resistenza” (near-neighbor to “perseveranza,” not a direct rendering of it)	Dominant sense: WWII anti-Fascist partisan Resistance, a major national historical/political memory.	Avoid using “resistenza” as a rendering of ὑπομονή at all; reserve any appeal to that historical memory for clearly-labeled illustrative material only.
”potenza” (δύναμις)	No competing external cultural sense, but an internal text-level collision: the same Italian word must render both God’s/Christ’s genuine power (1:7, 1:11) and Satan’s counterfeit, permitted power (2:9).	Resolve contextually/pedagogically (teaching notes clarifying “genuine” vs. “counterfeit, permitted”), not by inventing two different Italian words, per baseline’s cross-document-consistency requirement carried over from Romans 1:16.
”segno/segni” (σημεῖον/σημεῖα)	Internal homonym collision: theological “false signs and wonders” (2:9) vs. non-theological “authenticating sign” of Paul’s own handwriting (3:17).	Flag for reviewer awareness only; context fully disambiguates, no lexical action needed.

---

3. Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions

Term	Transliteration option	Paraphrase option	Decision	Rationale
παρουσία (parousia)	“parusia"	"venuta”	Paraphrase primary; transliteration as footnote gloss only	”Parusia” is unfamiliar to lay/secular/nominal-Catholic readers and would require its own gloss, defeating the purpose; “venuta” is the established Italian Bible-tradition rendering and remains intelligible while carrying royal-arrival connotations when paired with glory/judgment language in context.
ἀποστασία (apostasia)	“apostasia"	"abbandono della fede,” “ribellione”	Transliteration retained	Established Italian Bible-tradition term; a paraphrase would sacrifice recognizability across translations without actually escaping the canon-law collision (which attaches to the concept, not merely the word-form). Disambiguating note required regardless of which option is chosen, so transliteration is preferred for consistency with existing Italian Bibles.
Ἀββά (Abba) — cf. baseline	”Abba”	(n/a — no 2 Thessalonians occurrence, listed for consistency reference only)	Not applicable in this letter	Included only to confirm no conflict with baseline’s Abba transliteration convention; 2 Thessalonians does not use this term.
ἄνομος / ἀνομία family (lawlessness)	none proposed	”l’uomo dell’iniquità,” “il mistero dell’iniquità,” “l’iniquo”	Paraphrase/lexical-family choice, not transliteration	No Greek transliteration would communicate to a general reader; the priority is an internally consistent Italian lexical family distinct from “peccato,” achieved through the “iniquità” root, not through borrowing Greek.
μυστήριον (mystērion)	“mistero” (already a loanword-via-Latin, not a fresh transliteration)	—	Retain as-is, always qualified	Already fully naturalized in Italian; the decision point is qualification (“dell’iniquità”), not transliteration vs. paraphrase.
ἐπιφάνεια (epiphaneia)	“epifania"	"manifestazione”	Paraphrase; transliteration/loanword explicitly rejected	The Italian loanword “epifania” has drifted entirely to the January 6th folk holiday; unlike “parusia” (simply unfamiliar) this loanword is familiar but wrongly familiar — an active false-friend, making paraphrase the clear choice.
ψεῦδος / πλάνη (the Lie / delusion)	none proposed	”la menzogna” / “un’azione ingannatrice”	Paraphrase, no transliteration considered	Fully ordinary theological vocabulary; no transliteration tradition exists or is needed.
παράδοσις (paradosis)	“paradosi” (theoretical, essentially unused in Italian Bible tradition)	“tradizione”	Paraphrase (established loanword “tradizione”), not a fresh transliteration	”Tradizione” is itself already the universal, centuries-old Italian Bible rendering; introducing a novel transliteration would be both unprecedented and would not escape the doctrinal collision, which is conceptual, not lexical-form-based.

General principle for this curriculum: transliteration is reserved for cases where (a) an established Italian Bible-tradition transliteration already exists and is recognizable (apostasia), or (b) the concept is so specialized that a technical gloss alongside a natural-language primary term is more useful than forcing an awkward native coinage (parousia → venuta + parusia gloss). Transliteration is actively rejected wherever the resulting Italian word-form has drifted to an unrelated, strongly-loaded cultural sense in ordinary usage (epiphaneia → NOT “epifania”).

---

4. Ranked List of Highest-Risk Ambiguities

Ranked by combined doctrinal weight and likelihood of misreading by the described Italian audience (practicing/lapsed Catholic majority, Waldensian/evangelical minority, secular/biblically-unchurched readers).

1. “Tradizione” (παράδοσις, 2:15, 3:6) — Highest risk in the entire curriculum. Directly engages a live, unresolved Catholic-Protestant doctrinal boundary specific to Italy (Sacred Tradition vs. sola scriptura). Any unglossed occurrence will be read through one or the other community’s existing theological grid by default. Mandatory theologian review, every occurrence, fixed disambiguating note required.

2. “L’uomo dell’iniquità” / “l’iniquo” (ἀνομία family, 2:3, 7, 8) vs. baseline “peccato” (ἁμαρτία) — Risk of doctrinal conflation between two distinct Pauline categories (sin in general vs. eschatological lawlessness personified) if translators or reviewers default to the more familiar “peccato” word family. Mandatory theologian review; forbidden-substitution rule required (never “l’uomo del peccato”).

3. “Il giusto giudizio di Dio” / “condannati” (GRJ) — directional reversal risk — Reviewers trained on the baseline Romans package’s caution against over-legal readings of “giustizia” may over-correct and inadvertently soften 2 Thessalonians’ genuinely retributive judgment language, when the correct instruction here is the opposite: preserve, don’t soften, the judicial resonance. High risk of cross-curriculum habit transfer; explicit reviewer briefing required.

4. “Il maligno”/ “l’iniquo” vs. “l’anticristo” — figure conflation risk — Readers may default to the more familiar Johannine “anticristo” vocabulary (reinforced by popular eschatological fiction) when encountering 2 Thessalonians’ distinct “man of lawlessness” language, blending two related but textually separate NT figures/traditions. Human theologian review recommended at first occurrence (2:3).

5. “Ciò che trattiene / colui che trattiene” (the Restrainer, 2:6–7) — Genuine textual/interpretive indeterminacy compounded by translation risk: any Italian rendering that commits to a single referent (e.g., naming the Spirit, the Church, or the Empire outright) would improperly resolve an open exegetical question. Mandatory theologian review; mandatory footnote presenting the range of views; never silently resolved.

6. “L’apostasia” (2:3) — Canon-law technical sense (formal juridical renunciation of Catholic faith/baptism) risks narrowing Paul’s cosmic-scale falling-away to an institutional-membership category familiar from Italian ecclesiastical/legal discourse. Mandatory theologian review with disambiguating note.

7. “Perseveranza” (PUP, throughout ch. 1 and 3) — Tridentine “perseveranza finale” debate risk (merit/cooperation, possibility of losing final salvation) could import an unintended doctrinal position into pastoral encouragement passages not actually engaging that debate. Human theologian review recommended; explicit “Spirit-enabled endurance under persecution, not final-perseverance debate” framing note required.

8. “Vendetta” (ἐκδίκησις, 1:8) — Extremely strong Italian cultural loading toward personal/clan revenge cycles (mafia-genre salience) risks readers hearing God’s judgment as analogous to a human vendetta cycle rather than God’s exclusive judicial prerogative — ironically the opposite of Romans 12:19’s point (already in the baseline), which this verse’s vocabulary echoes. Human theologian review with explicit contrastive framing required.

9. “Mistero dell’iniquità” (2:7) — Bare “mistero” carries strong positive liturgical resonance (Rosary, Mass) that is the precise opposite valence of this verse; omission of the qualifier “dell’iniquità” in any downstream paraphrase, teaching aid, or heading would flip the term’s connotation entirely. Native-speaker/theologian check on every occurrence and derivative material (headings, summaries).

10. “Potenza” (δύναμις) — internal genuine/counterfeit collision (1:7, 1:11 vs. 2:9) — Because the identical Italian word must serve both God’s genuine power and Satan’s permitted, counterfeit power, any teaching material that quotes both passages side by side without contextual framing risks implying moral/ontological equivalence between the two. Native speaker review; contextual framing required, not lexical substitution.

11. “Manifestazione” vs. “epifania” (ἐπιφάνεια, 2:8) — Lower doctrinal risk than items above but a genuine false-friend trap: any translator or downstream editor unfamiliar with this analysis might reflexively reach for the seemingly obvious cognate “epifania,” triggering the January 6th/“Befana” folk-holiday association. Native speaker review; explicit forbidden-substitution note recommended for Phase 2 tooling.

12. “Fedele” / “il Signore è fedele” (3:3) — cross-reading with baseline “fede” — Low risk in itself, but reviewers should note the deliberate positive reuse of the “fede” root here (God’s own faithfulness) is structurally distinct from, though thematically supportive of, the negative ironic reuse of “credere” in “credere alla menzogna” (2:11) — a subtlety worth flagging in teaching notes so the letter’s faith/faithfulness wordplay is not lost. Native speaker review, informational flag only.

---

5. Summary of Required Phase 2 Actions

1. Load this analysis alongside analysis/08_core_glossary.md and assets/bible_term_registry.json before any 2 Thessalonians segment translation.
2. Extend the baseline translation_memory.json forbidden-substitution list with: “l’uomo del peccato” (never, for ἄνθρωπος τῆς ἀνομίας), “energia” (never, for ἐνέργεια in 2:7/2:9/2:11), “epifania” (never, for ἐπιφάνεια).
3. Extend the baseline escalation rules (human theologian review) to cover every occurrence of: Day of the Lord, Man of Lawlessness, Son of Destruction, the Lawless One, Apostasy, the Restrainer, Righteous Judgment of God, Vengeance/Retribution, and Tradition — consistent with Doctrine Risk Registry extension (Phase 1 Step 9).
4. Carry forward, unchanged, every baseline REUSED term’s rendering, risk tier, and rationale (rows 39–55 of the Core Glossary) with no modification introduced by this curriculum’s new context.