Linguistic Gap Analysis: James (Yakobus)

English → Malay | Phase 1, Step 8 Deliverable

1. Purpose and Scope

This document executes the linguistic gap analysis mandated for Phase 1 Step 8. It builds directly on analysis/08_core_glossary.md and assets/bible_term_registry.json, and treats the baseline Romans translation_memory.json as the non-negotiable language authority for every reused term.

Its purpose is threefold:

1. Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix — for each of the nine curriculum doctrines, catalogue the available Malay vocabulary, name its specific weaknesses (semantic gaps, collision risks, register mismatches), and recommend a translation strategy.
2. Gap Mapping — distinguish true missing vocabulary (concepts with no adequate existing Malay term, requiring compound coinage or paraphrase) from crowded semantic neighborhoods (existing Malay terms that are perfectly adequate but sit dangerously close to competing Islamic, Sufi-folk, or secular-Malaysian concepts and therefore require explicit lexical “fencing” in teaching material).
3. Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decision Log and Risk Ranking — record, term by term, why each was transliterated, reused, coined, or paraphrased, and rank the letter’s highest-risk ambiguities for downstream Phase 2 review routing.

Coverage spans all five chapters of James, organized by the nine named curriculum doctrines plus supporting God-vocabulary that recurs across all of them.

---

2. Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix

2.1 Faith and Works (core passage, James 2:14–26)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Faith	Iman [REUSED]	Object of faith not restated in 2:14 itself; Malay iman alone reads as generic religious assent (the six pillars of Islamic belief) unless the object (Christ) is supplied.	Reuse Iman exactly; require teaching notes to name the object of faith explicitly at every occurrence in James 2.
Works	Perbuatan [NEW] vs. Amal (rejected)	Amal is the natural, idiomatic Malay-Islamic word for “deeds” and would be the first word most Malay speakers reach for; but it activates the amal soleh ledger-of-deeds framework the whole Language Package exists to fence off.	Mandate Perbuatan; treat Amal as a hard forbidden substitution specific to this curriculum, parallel to the baseline’s forbidden-substitution list.
Justified (dual-sense)	Diperbenarkan [REUSED]	Single Malay verb must carry two theologically distinct senses (Paul’s forensic declaration vs. James’s public vindication) without a lexical marker distinguishing them.	Reuse the identical word (do not coin a second term); resolve the tension entirely in teaching apparatus, never by silently switching vocabulary between Romans and James.
Dead faith	Mati [NEW]	Malay has softer near-synonyms (lemah, tidak sempurna) that would blunt James’s categorical claim.	Mandate the full-strength Mati; forbid softening near-synonyms as a controlled vocabulary rule.
Demonstrative “show”	Tunjukkan [NEW]	Malay has near-synonyms (hasilkan, cipta — produce/create) that would shift the verb from evidentiary to causative, undermining the very distinction that resolves the Paul/James tension.	Mandate Tunjukkan; flag any drift toward causative-sense verbs during QA.
”God is one”	Allah itu esa [NEW]	Extremely close, almost verbatim, overlap with the Islamic tawhid confession (cf. Surah Al-Ikhlas); risk is not mistranslation but misapplication — Malay readers may hear James’s argument as a critique of tawhid itself rather than of bare intellectual assent.	Retain the natural rendering (no artificial distancing); route to human theologian review with mandatory framing note distinguishing “argument about the nature of saving faith” from “argument about monotheism.”
Demons	Syaitan-syaitan / roh-roh jahat [NEW]	Sits inside a populated Malay-Islamic and folk-animist spirit taxonomy (jin, syaitan, hantu); risk of readers treating this as one spirit-category among many rather than a category james explicitly ties to (false, condemned) belief.	Use Syaitan-syaitan; explicit teaching contrast with Roh Kudus category (never proximate in the same sentence without a clear divider).
Working together / Perfected	Bekerjasama / Disempurnakan [NEW]	Natural Malay near-readings suggest synergistic co-causation of salvation (a meritorious partnership) rather than root-and-fruit organic unity.	Pair both terms with mandatory teaching gloss (“root and fruit,” not “two causes”).
Imputed righteousness / Righteousness	Kebenaran yang diperhitungkan / Kebenaran [REUSED verbatim]	Same ambiguity risk as baseline (truth/correctness vs. moral-legal standing); James adds the complication of appearing in the same chapter as “justified by works,” compounding confusion if not distinguished from the forensic imputation concept.	Verbatim reuse mandatory; verbatim identity with Romans 4 citation is itself the strongest available teaching tool and must not be diluted.
Friend of God	Sahabat Allah [NEW]	Collides with the exclusive Qur’anic Khalilullah title reserved solely for Ibrahim; Malay Muslim readers may assume this must likewise be a unique, non-repeatable patriarchal honorific.	Use Sahabat Allah; mandatory teaching note stating the title is extended by James to any believer living by faith-with-works, directly confronting (not avoiding) the Khalilullah resonance.
Rahab	Rahab, perempuan sundal itu [NEW]	Frank sexual-moral vocabulary (sundal) may invite softening pressure in translation for propriety reasons.	Retain frank vocabulary; the moral contrast with Abraham is structurally load-bearing, not decorative.
Body/spirit	Tubuh / roh (lower-case) [NEW]	Malay does not mark case; risk that roh alone in a sentence about faith and works will be read/heard as Roh Kudus by a reader primed by other doctrines in this same curriculum.	Use qualifying phrasing (“roh manusia,” human spirit/breath) wherever ambiguity is possible rather than relying on typography alone.

2.2 Trials and the Testing of Faith (James 1)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Trial (positive) / Temptation (negative)	Ujian / Godaan [NEW, context-split]	One Greek word (peirasmos), two required Malay renderings; risk of a translator or reviewer “harmonizing” them back into one term for consistency, which would make God the grammatical subject of enticement to sin (contra 1:13).	Hard-code the split as a controlled-vocabulary rule with an explicit QA check: God must never be the subject of Godaan.
Endurance / Patience (distinct in ch.1 vs ch.5)	Ketekunan (1:3-4) vs. Kesabaran (5:7-8) [NEW]	Ordinary Malay usage often treats these as interchangeable synonyms; a natural-sounding translator could merge them, erasing James’s deliberate two-word structure spanning the letter.	Register both as distinct controlled terms tied to specific chapters; add a cross-reference flag at each occurrence.
Double-minded	Bermendua hati [NEW, rare coinage]	No everyday Malay equivalent exists for James’s likely self-coined Greek term (dipsychos); available near-synonyms (ragu-ragu, tidak tetap hati) lose the vivid “two-souled” image.	Mint/retain the compound Bermendua hati as the fixed rendering across both occurrences (1:8, 4:8); treat as missing vocabulary requiring coinage, not paraphrase.
Desire (source of sin)	Keinginan [NEW] vs. Hawa nafsu (rejected)	Hawa nafsu is the natural, idiomatic Malay-Islamic term and would be the default choice of most translators, but it imports the nafs-mastery spiritual-discipline framework (jihad al-nafs) as the solution, rather than James’s simpler desire→sin→death causal chain.	Mandate Keinginan; treat Hawa nafsu as forbidden across the whole curriculum (recurs in Wisdom doctrine too, see 2.3).
Pure religion	Agama yang murni dan tidak bernoda [NEW]	Agama is not a neutral religious-studies word in Malaysia; it is a constitutionally defined legal category (Federal Constitution Art. 3) appearing on identity documents and in state Islamic administration enactments.	No viable substitute exists (avoiding “agama” entirely would sound evasive); mandatory teaching disambiguation required at every occurrence — Critical risk, human theologian review non-negotiable.
Father of lights	Bapa segala terang [REUSED, extended]	Malay Sufi devotional tradition (Hamzah Fansuri and successors) uses light-vocabulary (nur) for the pre-existent “Light of Muhammad.”	Avoid nur entirely; use terang/cahaya, per baseline “glory” precedent — no gap, but a fencing requirement.

2.3 Wisdom from Above (James 1:5; 3:13–18)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Wisdom / Wisdom from above	Hikmat / Hikmat dari atas [NEW, established Alkitab convention]	Hikmah is a substantial, independent Islamic theological category (Qur’an 2:269, 31:12 Luqman’s wisdom) that can be conceived as a free-standing divine attribute accessible through piety and reflection apart from any mediator.	Retain Hikmat (no viable alternative; same class of decision as Rasul/Nabi/Injil in Romans); mandatory teaching note tying wisdom “from above” inseparably to Christ and the Spirit, not a generically accessible attribute.
Earthly / Unspiritual / Demonic wisdom (3-part escalation)	Duniawi / Manusiawi / Daripada syaitan [NEW]	Middle term (psychikē, “soulish/natural”) has no precise single Malay word; Manusiawi (“human, of humanity”) is an approximation that undersells the Greek’s psychological-anthropological technicality; hawa nafsu would be the tempting but forbidden alternative (see 2.2).	Accept Manusiawi as the best available approximation; supply a one-line gloss (“unaided by God’s Spirit”) wherever it appears, since the term alone under-communicates.
Fruit of righteousness	Buah kebenaran [REUSED, extended]	Inherits all baseline Kebenaran cautions.	No new strategy needed beyond baseline enforcement.

2.4 Favoritism and the Poor (James 2:1–13)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Favoritism	Berat sebelah / Memandang muka [NEW]	Not a doctrinal collision, but a live-wire cultural one: Malaysia’s own bumiputera preferential-policy discourse uses closely related vocabulary in public debate, risking off-topic political association.	Keep strictly scoped to intra-congregational rich/poor treatment in teaching apparatus; avoid any illustrative material referencing national policy.
Royal law	Hukum diraja [NEW]	Raja activates Malaysia’s living constitutional monarchy/sultanate register; risk of conflating “supreme, sovereign law” with an earthly kerajaan (government), an ambiguity the baseline already flags for Kerajaan Allah.	Retain Hukum diraja (best available rendering, and the royal resonance is usable positively); add explicit disambiguation from earthly government, cross-referencing the baseline’s Kingdom-of-God caution.
Law of liberty	Hukum yang membebaskan [NEW]	Structurally adjacent to “law” vocabulary; must never drift toward Syariah/Hukum Syariat.	Absolute forbidden-substitution status inherited directly from the Romans baseline; no exceptions.
Mercy	Belas kasihan [NEW] vs. Rahmat (rejected)	Rahmat is the natural, idiomatic choice and shares a root with extremely common everyday Malay-Islamic piety phrases; but it operates within a deeds-still-matter judgment framework, and this term sits one verse before the Faith-and-Works core passage, compounding the risk.	Mandate Belas kasihan; treat as a high-priority forbidden-substitution check specifically because of its proximity to 2:14.
Love your neighbor	Kasihilah sesamamu manusia [NEW, established Alkitab phrasing]	Kasih root is shared with Kasih kurnia (grace); a bare root-word reuse risks unintended doctrinal blending.	Always use the full established phrase, never an abbreviated “kasih” alone.

2.5 Taming the Tongue (James 3:1–12)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Tongue	Lidah [NEW]	Minimal lexical risk; literal and idiomatic.	No special strategy required beyond standard QA.
Hell/Gehenna	Neraka [NEW]	Malay neraka imports the fully elaborated Islamic eschatological cosmology (multiple named levels, described in Qur’an and Hadith) well beyond James’s narrower NT Gehenna background (the historical Valley of Hinnom as a judgment image).	No viable alternative exists; mandatory brief historical-background gloss at first occurrence.
Likeness of God	Keserupaan dengan Allah [NEW]	Classical Islamic tanzih (God’s transcendence, freedom from resemblance to creation) makes “likeness of God” language sound theologically risky to a Malay Muslim ear, even though the doctrine concerns humanity’s nature, not God’s form.	Retain the direct rendering (paraphrase-avoidance is intentional — softening it would blunt the verse’s argumentative hinge); mandatory theologian framing note distinguishing anthropology from theology proper.

2.6 Worldliness versus Friendship with God (James 1:27; 4:1–10)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Friendship with the world / Enmity with God	Persahabatan dengan dunia / Permusuhan dengan Allah [NEW]	Minimal lexical gap; the risk is rhetorical softening (adding a false middle ground) rather than word choice.	Preserve the stark either/or in translation; forbid hedging conjunctions that would imply a neutral third option.
Adulterous people	Kamu yang tidak setia (secara rohani) [NEW, paraphrase]	No single Malay word carries the OT prophetic marriage-covenant-infidelity image (cf. Hosea); the marriage metaphor for the God-human relationship is largely absent from Islamic theological vocabulary.	Accept paraphrase as necessary (true missing-vocabulary case, not merely a crowded neighborhood); supplement with an explanatory teaching note on the OT background rather than expecting the phrase alone to carry the metaphor.
Indwelling Spirit	Roh Kudus yang berdiam di dalam kita [REUSED, extended]	The concept of an indwelling divine presence has no parallel either in mainstream Islamic pneumatology (Spirit/Jibril as an external aid) or in Malay folk-animist roh halus concepts (impersonal nature-spirits); also a genuinely disputed verse in Greek textual/exegetical terms.	Retain baseline Roh Kudus; flag for theologian review on both doctrinal and textual-difficulty grounds simultaneously.
”If the Lord wills”	Jika Tuhan menghendaki(nya) [NEW]	Near-identical in form and daily function to the ubiquitous Malay-Muslim expression InsyaAllah, used reflexively for virtually any future plan.	Do not avoid the resonance (unavoidable and, if handled well, constructive); mandatory teaching framing distinguishing personal, purposive trust (cf. baseline Pemeliharaan Allah) from fatalistic takdir-style resignation.
Devil	Iblis [REUSED, established convention]	Also the specific Qur’anic proper name for the jinn who refused to prostrate before Adam (Qur’an 2:34; 7:11-18) — a related but distinctly different narrative figure from the biblical Satan/adversary.	Retain Iblis per established Alkitab precedent; add a short narrative-contrast note rather than assuming full equivalence.

2.7 Prayer and Healing (James 5:13–18)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Anoint with oil	Meminyaki dengan minyak [NEW]	Double collision risk: (1) traditional Malay bomoh folk-healing practice using oils/talismans believed to carry independent supernatural potency; (2) Roman Catholic sacramental Anointing of the Sick, a different theological category.	No lexical substitute solves this; the risk must be managed entirely through teaching material clarifying this is a simple faith-and-care practice accompanying prayer, not a ritual with independent power. Critical/High risk, mandatory theologian review.
Prayer of faith will heal (sōzō, healing sense)	Doa dengan iman akan menyembuhkan orang sakit [NEW, deliberate divergence from core-passage rendering]	Same Greek verb (sōzō) is rendered menyelamatkan in the core passage (2:14) and menyembuhkan here (5:15); an inconsistency-flagging QA process could wrongly “correct” this deliberate split.	Register explicitly as a controlled, context-dependent bifurcation (like Ujian/Godaan); tag both entries in translation memory so automated consistency checks do not misflag it.

2.8 Patience and the Lord’s Return (James 5:7–11)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Coming (Parousia) of the Lord	Kedatangan Tuhan [NEW]	Mainstream Sunni eschatology has its own doctrine of Isa’s return (Nuzul Isa), in which the returning Isa submits to and confirms Islamic teaching (prays behind the Mahdi, breaks crosses, later dies naturally) — substantially different from Christ’s unveiled, exclusive, glorious return as divine Judge.	No lexical alternative avoids the resonance; mandatory Critical-tier theologian review with explicit doctrinal contrast, treated with the same seriousness as Resurrection/Deity of Christ in the Romans baseline.
Compassionate and merciful	Penyayang dan berbelas kasihan [NEW]	Near-paraphrase of two of the most frequently recited Islamic divine names, Ar-Rahman and Ar-Rahim.	Anchor concretely to the person of Christ and the Job narrative in every occurrence; do not let the phrase stand as a free-floating attribute list.
Oaths	Sumpah / bersumpah [NEW]	Directly countercultural against the common Malay-Muslim speech habit of invoking Allah’s name for emphasis (e.g., “wallahi”).	Frame as a distinctive, positive teaching point (simple truthfulness) rather than an implicit critique of a common speech pattern; native-speaker sensitivity review recommended.

2.9 Confession and Restoration (James 5:16, 19–20)

Concept	Available Malay Term(s)	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
Confess your sins to one another	Mengaku dosa seorang kepada yang lain [NEW]	Sits between two other confession models familiar to Malay readers: Catholic sacramental confession to a priest, and Islamic tawbah (private, vertical, individual-to-Allah repentance, no required human intermediary); James’s horizontal, mutual, non-sacramental model fits neither pattern.	No existing Malay term captures this middle model; retain the descriptive phrase and supply explicit teaching contrast against both alternative models rather than assuming the phrase alone communicates James’s distinctive practice.
Cover a multitude of sins	Akan menudungi banyak dosa [NEW]	Risk of being heard as human merit/atonement (the restorer’s act itself “covering” sin), reactivating the amal-soleh caution.	Mandatory teaching note grounding the “covering” in Christ’s own prior forgiveness, not in the restorer’s meritorious action.

---

3. Missing Vocabulary vs. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods

3.1 True Missing Vocabulary (no adequate existing Malay term; requires coinage or paraphrase)

These are concepts for which ordinary Malay simply lacks a ready-made lexical item, as distinct from concepts where a good Malay word exists but must be fenced off from a competing concept.

Concept	Gap Type	Resolution
Double-minded (dipsychos, 1:8, 4:8)	James’s own likely neologism; no Malay equivalent exists at any register	Coin and fix the compound Bermendua hati across both occurrences
Adulterous people (moichalides, 4:4) as covenant-infidelity metaphor	OT prophetic marriage-covenant image not native to Malay religious vocabulary	Retain descriptive paraphrase Kamu yang tidak setia (secara rohani); cannot be reduced to a single word without loss
”Cover a multitude of sins” idiom (5:20)	No fixed Malay idiom of equivalent compactness	Retain literal-relational paraphrase Akan menudungi banyak dosa with mandatory grounding note
Confess sins to one another as a horizontal, non-sacramental, non-vertical-only practice (5:16)	No existing single Malay religious-practice term maps onto this specific configuration	Retain descriptive phrase Mengaku dosa seorang kepada yang lain; teach as a distinctive practice, not an equivalent of an existing category
”Unspiritual/soulish” wisdom (psychikē, 3:15)	No precise single-word Malay match for this specific NT anthropological category	Use approximation Manusiawi with mandatory explanatory gloss

3.2 Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods Requiring Fencing (good Malay term exists, but must be actively distinguished from a nearby competing concept)

Malay Term	Competing Neighbor	Fencing Requirement
Perbuatan (works)	Amal (Islamic deeds-ledger)	Amal is a forbidden substitution across this entire curriculum
Belas kasihan (mercy)	Rahmat (Islamic deeds-conditioned mercy)	Rahmat forbidden; extra vigilance given proximity to 2:14 core passage
Keinginan (desire)	Hawa nafsu (Islamic nafs-mastery framework)	Hawa nafsu forbidden in both Trials (1:14-15) and Wisdom (3:15) doctrines
Hikmat (wisdom)	Hikmah as an independent, gospel-detached Islamic attribute	Mandatory tie-to-Christ/Spirit gloss at every occurrence
Sahabat Allah (friend of God)	Khalilullah (exclusive Abrahamic title)	Mandatory “extended to any believer” teaching note
Allah itu esa (God is one)	Tawhid confession (Shema-echo)	Mandatory framing distinguishing critique-of-bare-assent from critique-of-monotheism
Agama yang murni… (pure religion)	Constitutional/legal “agama” category (Federal Constitution Art. 3)	Mandatory legal/theological disambiguation; Critical risk
Neraka (hell/Gehenna)	Full Islamic eschatological cosmology (named hell-levels)	Mandatory historical-background gloss (Valley of Hinnom)
Keserupaan dengan Allah (likeness of God)	Tanzih/tashbih sensitivities (God’s non-resemblance to creation)	Mandatory anthropology-not-theology-proper framing
Jika Tuhan menghendaki (if the Lord wills)	InsyaAllah (everyday fatalistic-adjacent speech habit)	Mandatory personal-providence-not-takdir framing
Iblis (devil)	Qur’anic Iblis-and-Adam prostration narrative	Mandatory narrative-contrast note
Meminyaki dengan minyak (anoint with oil)	Bomoh occult-oil practice; Catholic sacramental unction	Mandatory “simple faith practice, not independent ritual power” framing
Kedatangan Tuhan (coming of the Lord)	Nuzul Isa (Sunni Isa-returns doctrine)	Mandatory Critical-tier doctrinal contrast
Penyayang dan berbelas kasihan (compassionate/merciful)	Ar-Rahman/Ar-Rahim recited divine names	Mandatory anchoring to Christ/Job narrative, not free-floating attributes
Roh (human spirit, 2:26)	Roh Kudus (Holy Spirit)	Mandatory lower-case/qualifying-phrase distinction; never allow bare “Roh” to stand ambiguously
Ketekunan / Kesabaran (endurance/patience)	Each other (near-synonyms in ordinary Malay)	Mandatory chapter-specific fixed assignment; forbid harmonizing them into one term
Ujian / Godaan (trial/temptation)	Each other (same Greek word, opposite doctrinal implications)	Hard-coded context split; God never grammatical subject of Godaan
Menyelamatkan / Menyembuhkan (save/heal, both from sōzō)	Each other (same Greek verb)	Explicit registration as intentional bifurcation, not inconsistency

---

4. Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions

Decision Type	Terms	Rationale
Reuse baseline verbatim (no change permitted)	Iman, Diperbenarkan, Kebenaran, Kebenaran yang diperhitungkan, Kasih kurnia, Roh Kudus, Allah, Tuhan, Dosa, Gereja, Hukum Taurat, Iblis	Cross-curriculum doctrinal consistency mandate; James reuses the identical Greek/theological vocabulary Romans already resolved.
Established Alkitab convention retained despite Islamic-vocabulary overlap	Hikmat, Iblis, Nabi (where prophets are referenced), Rasul (where apostleship is referenced)	Precedent already set in the Romans baseline (Rasul/Nabi/Injil); consistency of method across the whole Language Package, managed via teaching disambiguation rather than word substitution.
New coinage/compound required (missing vocabulary)	Bermendua hati (double-minded)	No existing Malay word or phrase carries the split-souled image; must be fixed once and reused identically at both occurrences (1:8, 4:8).
Paraphrase accepted as necessary (no single-word solution exists)	Kamu yang tidak setia (secara rohani); Akan menudungi banyak dosa; Mengaku dosa seorang kepada yang lain; Hukum yang membebaskan	Compactness sacrificed deliberately for doctrinal accuracy; each requires a supporting teaching gloss rather than reliance on the phrase alone.
Deliberate context-split of one source word into two Malay renderings	Ujian/Godaan (peirasmos); Ketekunan/Kesabaran (hypomonē/makrothymia, cross-chapter); Menyelamatkan/Menyembuhkan (sōzō)	A single Malay rendering would either introduce false theology (God tempting) or erase a structurally significant lexical distinction James himself maintains.
Retained frank/direct vocabulary (paraphrase-avoidance is intentional)	Rahab, perempuan sundal itu; Keserupaan dengan Allah; Permusuhan dengan Allah	Softening would blunt argumentative force that is structurally load-bearing to the passage, not incidental.
Retained transliterated proper names (established Alkitab forms, no alternatives)	Elia (Elijah), Ayub (Job), Abraham, Daud (David, cross-referenced)	Standard proper-noun policy; no theological content at stake in the name form itself.

---

5. Ranked List of Highest-Risk Ambiguities

Ranked by combined severity (doctrinal centrality × collision strength × likelihood of misreading in the Malaysian Malay-Muslim-majority context). Top-ranked items require mandatory human theologian review with a specific accompanying teaching note; all are Critical or High risk.

1. “Justified” (2:21, 24, 25) — apparent contradiction with Romans’ justification doctrine. The single highest cross-document risk in this curriculum: identical Malay word (Diperbenarkan) used for two theologically distinct senses within the same Language Package. Failure to resolve this explicitly could produce the most consequential doctrinal confusion of the entire book.
2. “Works” (Perbuatan) vs. Amal. The word most likely to be silently substituted by a well-meaning translator reaching for natural Malay-Islamic idiom, directly reactivating the amal-soleh framework the whole Language Package is built to prevent — and doing so in the curriculum’s core passage.
3. Anoint with oil (5:14). Dual collision (bomoh occult practice + Catholic sacramental unction) with no lexical escape route; entirely dependent on teaching-material framing.
4. Coming of the Lord / Parousia (5:7-9). Direct doctrinal collision with a formally taught Sunni eschatological doctrine (Nuzul Isa) that superficially resembles but substantively contradicts James’s claim.
5. Pure religion / Agama (1:27). The single most legally sensitive term in the book outside “Allah” itself, given Malaysia’s constitutional and administrative use of “agama.”
6. Mercy (Belas kasihan) vs. Rahmat (2:13). High risk specifically because of its structural proximity (one verse) to the Faith-and-Works core passage; a slip here compounds risk #2.
7. “God is one” (2:19). Near-verbatim overlap with the tawhid confession; risk is not mistranslation but James’s rhetorical use of a shared confession in a way that could read as dismissive of tawhid if not carefully framed.
8. Friend of God (2:23) vs. Khalilullah. Risk that Malay readers assume James is claiming (falsely, from an Islamic perspective) a title exclusively reserved for Abraham, rather than recognizing James’s own extension of the title to all believers.
9. Desire (Keinginan) vs. Hawa nafsu (1:14-15; 3:15). Recurs in two separate doctrines (Trials; Wisdom), doubling the exposure if the forbidden substitution slips through in either location.
10. Likeness of God (3:9) — tanzih/tashbih sensitivity. The argument’s structural hinge verse; a hesitant or euphemistic rendering here would silently weaken James’s core ethical argument about human speech.
11. Indwelling Spirit (4:5). Compounds ordinary doctrinal risk with genuine Greek textual/exegetical difficulty; requires dual-track flagging (doctrinal AND textual).
12. Confess your sins to one another (5:16). A practice that fits neither the Catholic-confessional nor the Islamic-tawbah models familiar to likely readers; risk of the practice simply not being understood as intended without explicit teaching.
13. “If the Lord wills” (4:15) vs. InsyaAllah. Lower doctrinal severity than items above, but very high frequency of encounter risk given how embedded the parallel expression is in daily Malay-Muslim speech.
14. Hell/Gehenna (3:6) vs. full Islamic eschatological cosmology. Real but more containable risk, since the concept of post-mortem judgment itself is shared ground; the risk is background-conflation rather than direct doctrinal contradiction.
15. Oaths (5:12) vs. everyday oath-invocation speech habits. Countercultural teaching point; risk is reader alienation/misunderstanding rather than doctrinal corruption.

---

6. Forward Recommendations for Steps 9–17

• Every term flagged Critical or High above must carry its fencing/framing note forward verbatim into the doctrine risk registry and the AI translation requirements document, not merely into this analysis.
• The three deliberate one-source-word/two-target-word splits (Ujian/Godaan; Ketekunan/Kesabaran; Menyelamatkan/Menyembuhkan) must be explicitly whitelisted in Phase 2 QA tooling so automated consistency checks do not misflag them as translator drift.
• The Paul/James “justified” tension (item #1) should receive a dedicated, standalone teaching-note template reusable at all three occurrences (2:21, 2:24, 2:25), rather than three separately drafted notes risking drift in how the resolution is worded.
• No chapter of James is exempt from this analysis: Chapter 1 (Trials, Wisdom seed, Pure Religion), Chapter 2 (Favoritism, core Faith-and-Works passage), Chapter 3 (Tongue, Wisdom), Chapter 4 (Worldliness), and Chapter 5 (Prayer/Healing, Patience/Return, Confession/Restoration) are all represented above with load-bearing analysis; none contributed only reused, risk-free vocabulary.