Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis
This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.
Risk tier summary
| Tier | Count | Review routing | Example doctrines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 6 | Human theologian, every occurrence | Salvation, Justification-adjacent Salvation doctrine, Deity/Sonship/Resurrection/Lordship of Christ, Messianic Promise |
| High | 13 | Human theologian | Gospel, Divine Calling, Grace, Faith, Sanctification, Sainthood, Assurance of Salvation, Universal Human Accountability |
| Medium | 17 | Native speaker review | Inspiration of Scripture, Adoption, Prayer and Intercession, Spiritual Gifts, Church as God’s People, Evangelism |
| Low | 4 | Automated review only | Apostleship, Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship |
Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do
Czech has the smallest Critical-risk cluster of any Language Package in this batch (6, compared to 8-10 in most others), precisely because most doctrinal content here is not being actively distorted by a rival framework — it is simply unfamiliar. The doctrines that remain Critical are the ones where a specific dominant secular reading (Pán as “Mister,” ordinary excuse-making for ospravedlnění) or total conceptual vacancy (spasení as an archaism) poses a severe enough comprehension failure that the doctrine could be lost entirely rather than merely under-explained. The core Christological doctrines are Critical for the same universal reason shared across every Language Package: any mistranslation here would destroy essential, creedal Christian doctrine.
Review routing rationale
Critical and High risk doctrines (19 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Czech is grammatically correct and even lexically traditional without catching that the intended meaning never actually reaches a reader with no prior framework for it. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is general clarity and register rather than a severe comprehension or doctrinal failure.