Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis

1 John 1–5 | Koine Greek Source Analysis for Fulfulde Translation

Curriculum: 1 John Core passage: 1 John 4:7–21 Destination language: Fulfulde (Fula)


How to Read This Document

Every load-bearing term is given with: original Greek word, transliteration, literal meaning, semantic range, English variants (as different English Bible versions render it), contextual theological meaning in the passage, and destination-language rendering risk (the assigned Fulfulde term, its risk tier, and the specific reason for that tier — reusing baseline translation_memory.json renderings exactly wherever a term already exists there).

Risk tiers follow the baseline doctrine_risk_registry.json definitions exactly:

  • Critical — will be automatically read through and rejected by a specific, well-articulated Islamic theological framework unless explicitly engaged; human theologian review required.
  • High — significant theological confusion risk, unconfirmed/not-yet-crystallized rendering, or syncretism risk with Islamic-folk or Pulaaku categories; human theologian review required.
  • Medium — reduces clarity but preserves essential meaning; native speaker review recommended.
  • Low — minor imprecision; automated review sufficient.

Where a term is already recorded in the baseline Romans translation_memory.json, it is marked [BASELINE REUSE — enforced exactly]. Where 1 John requires a new term not present in the baseline, it is marked [NEW TERM — proposed for Fulfulde extension memory] and should be added to a curriculum-specific extension of translation_memory.json in Phase 1 Step 8/9 tooling, pending theologian confirmation per the baseline’s standing rule for provisional descriptive compounds.


PART 1 — CORE PASSAGE: 1 JOHN 4:7–21 (Verse-by-Verse)

4:7 — Ἀγαπητοί, ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους, ὅτι ἡ ἀγάπη ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ ἐστιν, καὶ πᾶς ὁ ἀγαπῶν ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ γεγέννηται καὶ γινώσκει τὸν θεόν.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
ἀγαπητοί
agapētoi
”beloved ones”
term of endearment; those who are objects of agapē-love
”beloved,” “dear friends,” “dear ones”
John’s pastoral address, grounding the command in relationship, not obligationgiggaaɓe (beloved ones, from proposed noun giggol “love”) — [NEW TERM] Medium. Must not default to a generic affectionate address stripped of covenantal warmth.
ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους
agapōmen allēlous
”let us love one another”
mutual, reciprocal love within the community of believers
”let us love one another,” “let us love each other”
The central ethical command of the letter; love for fellow believers, not romantic or merely familial loveyiɗen musiɗɓe amen (verb yiɗde, “to love”) — [NEW TERM] High. Fulfulde yiɗde is the general verb for “love/want,” used identically for food, family, and God; the text’s specific self-giving, God-originated love must be taught explicitly, not assumed from the verb alone.
ἀγάπη
agapē
”love” (self-giving, willed love)
ranges from romantic love to divine self-giving love; NT narrows it toward the latter
”love,” “charity” (KJV)
Here: the very nature and source of authentic love — it originates from Godgiggol (noun) — [NEW TERM] CRITICAL. See doctrine-level note below (4:8).
ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ
ek tou theou
”out of/from God”
source, origin
”of God,” “from God,” “comes from God”
Love’s ultimate source is God himself, not human sentiment or reciprocityAlla — [BASELINE REUSE].
γεγέννηται
gegennētai
”has been born/begotten” (perfect passive)
birth; by extension, spiritual regeneration
”is born,” “has been born,” “is a child”
New birth from God is the root cause of a genuine capacity to love this wayjibinaaɗo Alla (“born of God”) — [NEW TERM] High. Builds on the jibin- root already used in the baseline’s “peewal jibinaangal” (imputed righteousness), for morphological consistency, but denotes a distinct doctrine (regeneration, not forensic crediting) and must be taught as such.
γινώσκει
ginōskei
”knows” (present, ongoing)
experiential, relational knowledge, not mere information
”knows,” “has come to know”
Genuine relational knowledge of God is evidenced by a life of loveanndude Alla (to know God) — [NEW TERM] Medium. Distinguish from gomɗinal (baseline: faith/trust) — this is relational acquaintance flowing from faith, not faith itself.

4:8 — ὁ μὴ ἀγαπῶν οὐκ ἔγνω τὸν θεόν, ὅτι ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν
ho theos agapē estin
”God is love” (predicate nominative, no article on ἀγάπη)
an ontological identity-statement about God’s very nature, not merely one of his acts
”God is love”
One of two “God is ___” statements in this letter (cf. 1:5 “God is light”); love is not simply something God does but part of what God isAlla ko giggol[NEW TERM] CRITICAL. This is the single highest-stakes rendering decision in the letter. Islamic theology affirms Allah’s love (al-Wadūd, “The Loving,” one of the 99 names) as a responsive attribute, conditioned on piety and obedience (cf. Qur’an 3:31–32, “Allah loves those who…”), not an unconditional essence-statement preceding and independent of merit. Rendering must preserve the ontological “is,” not soften to “God loves” (an action-statement compatible with conditional Islamic usage). Requires explicit theological teaching contrasting essence-love with responsive-love; must not be left to the word alone.
ἔγνω
egnō
”knew” (aorist)
as above, relational
”knew,” “does not know”
Failure to love reveals that one has never truly known God relationally, whatever one professesanndude — [NEW TERM, see 4:7] Medium.

4:9 — ἐν τούτῳ ἐφανερώθη ἡ ἀγάπη τοῦ θεοῦ ἐν ἡμῖν, ὅτι τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ τὸν μονογενῆ ἀπέσταλκεν ὁ θεὸς εἰς τὸν κόσμον, ἵνα ζήσωμεν διʼ αὐτοῦ.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
ἐφανερώθη
ephanerōthē
”was manifested/made visible” (aorist passive)
disclosure of something previously hidden
”was manifested,” “was revealed,” “was shown”
God’s love became historically visible in a specific, datable actfeeñinaa (was revealed/made to appear) — [NEW TERM] Medium.
τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ τὸν μονογενῆ
ton huion autou ton monogenē
”his only-begotten/unique Son”
μονογενής: one-of-a-kind, unique, not “only-born” in a biological sense but “unique, one-of-a-kind"
"his one and only Son,” “his only begotten Son,” “his one Son”
Direct assertion of Christ’s unique, exclusive divine Sonship — parallel to John 3:16Ɓiɗɗo Alla gooto tun (“God’s Son, the only one”) — [BASELINE REUSE of “Ɓiɗɗo Alla,” + NEW modifier “gooto tun”] CRITICAL. This is precisely the doctrine flagged Critical in the baseline registry (sonship_of_christ): must never be softened, and directly contradicts the Tawhid-based objection (echoing Qur’an 112, “He begets not, nor is He begotten”) that many Fulfulde readers with Islamic scholarly formation will raise immediately. Must be taught with direct engagement, not avoided.
ἀπέσταλκεν
apestalken
”has sent” (perfect)
sending with purpose and authority
”sent,” “has sent”
God the Father as sender of the Son — the ultimate “sending,” behind all human sending/apostleshipnulaa (verb form of nul-, “to send”) — [NEW TERM, root shared with BASELINE “nulaaɗo”] Medium. Using the same root as “apostle” (nulaaɗo, “one sent”) is theologically appropriate — human apostles are sent in the pattern of the Son’s sending — but must be clearly distinguished grammatically (here God sends his own Son, a categorically different, unrepeatable sending) from ordinary apostolic sending.
τὸν κόσμον
ton kosmon
”the world”
(a) the created order; (b) humanity in general; (c) the moral system opposed to God — all three senses occur in 1 John
”the world,” “into the world”
Here: the inhabited human world as the destination of the Son’s missionaduna[NEW TERM] High. See doctrine-level note under Chapter 2.
ζήσωμεν
zēsōmen
”we might live” (aorist subjunctive)
life, in the specifically Johannine sense of resurrection/eternal life
”might live,” “would live”
The purpose of the sending: that believers might have life through the Sonwuurde (to live) — [NEW TERM] Low, but see “eternal life” (nguurndam duumiiɗam) below for the doctrinally loaded noun form.

4:10 — ἐν τούτῳ ἐστὶν ἡ ἀγάπη, οὐχ ὅτι ἡμεῖς ἠγαπήσαμεν τὸν θεόν, ἀλλʼ ὅτι αὐτὸς ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς καὶ ἀπέστειλεν τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ ἱλασμὸν περὶ τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν ἡμῶν.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
οὐχ ὅτι ἡμεῖς ἠγαπήσαμεν… ἀλλʼ ὅτι αὐτὸς ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς
ouch hoti hēmeis ēgapēsamen… all’ hoti autos ēgapēsen hēmas
”not that we loved… but that he loved us”
priority and initiation
”not that we loved God, but that he loved us”
God’s love is prior to and independent of human response — the same “apart from works” logic as baseline’s grace doctrine, applied to love itselfStructural contrast must be preserved explicitly in Fulfulde word order — High, parallel risk to baseline’s arjunde (grace) caution: if softened, giggol risks the same reciprocal, piety-conditioned reading Islamic usage gives arjunde.
ἱλασμὸν περὶ τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν ἡμῶν
hilasmon peri tōn hamartiōn hēmōn
”a propitiation/atoning sacrifice concerning our sins”
ἱλασμός: that which turns away wrath / covers/removes sin’s guilt through sacrifice
”an atoning sacrifice,” “a propitiation,” “to atone for”
The Son’s sending had a specific atoning purpose — this is not sentiment, it is substitutionary sacrifice for sinsadaka Almasiihu yaafuya bakkaatuuji amen (“Christ’s sacrifice atones for our sins”) — [NEW TERM] CRITICAL. Descriptive compound required; no crystallized single Fulfulde theological term exists (consistent with this language’s thinner translation tradition, as noted throughout the baseline). Islamic soteriology has no atonement framework at all — sin is addressed through Allah’s discretionary mercy weighed against deeds and sincere repentance (tawba), never through a substitutionary sacrifice. This must be taught explicitly and cannot be assumed from vocabulary alone, exactly as the baseline instructs for grace and salvation.
ἁμαρτιῶν
hamartiōn
”sins”
moral transgression
”sins”
bakkaatu — [BASELINE REUSE].

4:11 — Ἀγαπητοί, εἰ οὕτως ὁ θεὸς ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς, καὶ ἡμεῖς ὀφείλομεν ἀλλήλους ἀγαπᾶν.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
ὀφείλομεν
opheilomen
”we owe/are obligated”
debt-obligation language, borrowed from commercial/legal domain
”we ought,” “we are obligated,” “we owe it”
Believers’ love for one another is a responsive debt flowing from having received God’s prior love, not a means of earning iten fotii (“it is fitting/required of us”) — [NEW TERM] Medium. Care must be taken that “obligation” here reads as gratitude-response, not as a meritorious work that itself earns standing before God (which would collapse back into the deeds-weighing framework flagged Critical for arjunde/grace).

4:12 — θεὸν οὐδεὶς πώποτε τεθέαται· ἐὰν ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους, ὁ θεὸς ἐν ἡμῖν μένει καὶ ἡ ἀγάπη αὐτοῦ ἐν ἡμῖν τετελειωμένη ἐστίν.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
θεὸν οὐδεὶς πώποτε τεθέαται
theon oudeis pōpote tetheatai
”no one has ever seen God”
direct visual perception
”no one has ever seen God”
God’s invisibility contrasted with the visible evidence of love among believersyi’ude (to see) — [NEW TERM] Low.
μένει
menei
”abides/remains/dwells”
ongoing indwelling relational presence, a key Johannine theological term (used ~24 times across 1 John)
“abides,” “remains,” “lives in”
Mutual love is the visible evidence of God’s continuing, indwelling presence in believersñiiɓde (“to remain/dwell/abide”) — [NEW TERM] High. This term must be established early and used consistently throughout the letter (it recurs in nearly every chapter). It must be distinguished both from mere physical residing and from Sufi ḥulūl (mystical indwelling/union with the divine), a concept regarded even within Islamic orthodoxy as theologically fraught; the Johannine sense is covenantal relational communion, not metaphysical absorption or fusion of being.
τετελειωμένη ἐστίν
teteleiōmenē estin
”has been perfected/completed” (perfect passive)
brought to its intended completeness/maturity
”is perfected,” “is made complete”
Love reaches its full, God-intended expression through being shared in communitytimmude (to be complete) — [NEW TERM] Medium.

4:13 — Ἐν τούτῳ γινώσκομεν ὅτι ἐν αὐτῷ μένομεν καὶ αὐτὸς ἐν ἡμῖν, ὅτι ἐκ τοῦ πνεύματος αὐτοῦ δέδωκεν ἡμῖν.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
ἐκ τοῦ πνεύματος αὐτοῦ δέδωκεν ἡμῖν
ek tou pneumatos autou dedōken hēmin
”he has given us of his Spirit”
the Spirit as gift, evidence of mutual indwelling
”given us his Spirit,” “given us of his Spirit”
The Holy Spirit’s presence is the ground of assurance of mutual abidingRuuhu Ceniiɗo — [BASELINE REUSE — enforced exactly, never shortened].

4:14 — καὶ ἡμεῖς τεθεάμεθα καὶ μαρτυροῦμεν ὅτι ὁ πατὴρ ἀπέσταλκεν τὸν υἱὸν σωτῆρα τοῦ κόσμου.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
μαρτυροῦμεν
martyroumen
”we testify/bear witness”
eyewitness legal testimony
”we testify,” “we bear witness”
Apostolic eyewitness authority undergirds the letter’s claims (cf. 1:1-3)seedaade (“to testify,” from seede, “witness”) — [NEW TERM] High. See doctrine-level note on “confess/testify” under Chapter 1 — this vocabulary family runs a structural parallel, in form only, to the Islamic shahāda (testimony/confession of faith), and must be handled with the same care the baseline gives Almasiihu (shared vocabulary ≠ shared content).
ὁ πατὴρ
ho patēr
”the Father”

“the Father”
God as personal FatherBaaba — [BASELINE REUSE].
σωτῆρα τοῦ κόσμου
sōtēra tou kosmou
”Savior of the world”
one who rescues/delivers
”Savior of the world”
Christ’s universal-scope saving missionKisoowo aduna (“Savior/Rescuer of the world,” built on the kis- root of [BASELINE REUSE] kisal) — [NEW TERM, morphologically consistent with baseline] CRITICAL. Same caution as baseline’s salvation entry: must not default into a deeds-weighing framework, and “world” (aduna) here must be read as scope of mission, not endorsement of worldly (dunya) values elsewhere condemned in this same letter (2:15-17).

4:15 — ὃς ἂν ὁμολογήσῃ ὅτι Ἰησοῦς ἐστιν ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ, ὁ θεὸς ἐν αὐτῷ μένει καὶ αὐτὸς ἐν τῷ θεῷ.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
ὁμολογήσῃ
homologēsē
”confesses/acknowledges” (from homo- “same” + logos “word” — to say the same thing, agree)
public, verbal acknowledgment/confession
”confesses,” “acknowledges,” “declares”
The confession “Jesus is the Son of God” is the identifying mark of genuine indwelling faithjaɓa (from jaɓde, “to accept/receive/confess,” reusing the jaɓ- root already present in baseline’s “jaɓugol wonande ɓiɗɗo,” adoption) — [NEW TERM] CRITICAL. This exact confession is the direct verbal negation of the Islamic shahāda’s core content (“there is no god… and Muhammad is His messenger” — with no son ascribed to Allah at all). The confession must be rendered plainly and completely; it is precisely the kind of statement the baseline instructs must never be softened (see sonship_of_christ, Critical).
Ἰησοῦς…ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ
Iēsous… ho huios tou theou
”Jesus… the Son of God”

“Jesus is the Son of God”
Direct identity statementYeesu… Ɓiɗɗo Alla — [BASELINE REUSE — enforced exactly, verbatim across documents per baseline consistency rule].

4:16 — καὶ ἡμεῖς ἐγνώκαμεν καὶ πεπιστεύκαμεν τὴν ἀγάπην ἣν ἔχει ὁ θεὸς ἐν ἡμῖν. ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν, καὶ ὁ μένων ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ ἐν τῷ θεῷ μένει καὶ ὁ θεὸς ἐν αὐτῷ μένει.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
πεπιστεύκαμεν
pepisteukamen
”have believed/come to trust” (perfect)
settled, ongoing trust
”have believed,” “have come to believe,” “trust”
Belief and knowledge of God’s love are inseparable and abidinggomɗinal (verbal form) — [BASELINE REUSE]. Object of faith must be explicit: God’s love in particular, not generic religious belief (per baseline’s standing caution on faith).
ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν (repeated)


Repetition for emphasis — the letter’s central ontological claim about God restatedSee 4:8 above — CRITICAL, same rendering enforced identically both occurrences (per this document’s cross-document consistency principle, parallel to baseline’s rule for Romans 1:16-17).

4:17 — Ἐν τούτῳ τετελείωται ἡ ἀγάπη μεθʼ ἡμῶν, ἵνα παρρησίαν ἔχωμεν ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῆς κρίσεως, ὅτι καθὼς ἐκεῖνός ἐστιν καὶ ἡμεῖς ἐσμεν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ τούτῳ.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
παρρησίαν
parrēsian
”boldness/confidence/freedom of speech”
courage to stand without shame or fear
”confidence,” “boldness”
Assurance before God’s judgment, grounded in love perfected, not in performancehardeende (“boldness/confidence”) — [NEW TERM] Medium. Directly relevant to baseline’s assurance_of_salvation doctrine risk: this confidence rests on Christ’s finished atoning work (4:10), not a favorable outcome in a deeds-weighing process.
ἡμέρᾳ τῆς κρίσεως
hēmera tēs kriseōs
”day of judgment”
eschatological final judgment
”day of judgment,” “judgment day”
The final reckoning before Godñalaande ñaawoore (“day of judgment,” from ñaaw-, “to judge”) — [NEW TERM] High. This parallels the Islamic Yawm al-Qiyāma/Yawm ad-Dīn (Day of Resurrection/Judgment), a deeply familiar concept — genuine common ground, but the basis of confidence on that day differs sharply: Romans/1 John ground it in union with Christ and perfected love, not a scale of weighed deeds (mīzān). This distinction must be taught explicitly, not left implicit.

4:18 — φόβος οὐκ ἔστιν ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ, ἀλλʼ ἡ τελεία ἀγάπη ἔξω βάλλει τὸν φόβον, ὅτι ὁ φόβος κόλασιν ἔχει, ὁ δὲ φοβούμενος οὐ τετελείωται ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
φόβος
phobos
”fear”
servile dread of punishment (this context), distinct elsewhere from reverential awe
”fear,” “terror,” “dread”
The specific fear in view is dread of condemnation/punishment, not reverencekulol (“fear”) — [NEW TERM] High. This requires careful qualification: Islamic spirituality places strong positive weight on taqwa (God-fearing reverence/mindfulness) as a core virtue. John is not condemning reverence for God but the servile dread of punishment that has no place once perfected love and assurance are present. Must be taught precisely, not as “fear of God is bad,” which would create unnecessary and inaccurate friction with a shared value.
κόλασιν
kolasin
”punishment/torment”
retributive penalty
”punishment,” “torment”
The object of the fear being cast out — dread of just retributionlepte (punishment, Arabic-derived, shared vocabulary with Islamic ‘adhāb) — [NEW TERM] Medium.
τελεία ἀγάπη
teleia agapē
”perfect/complete love”
full, mature, unhindered love
”perfect love,” “complete love”
Love that has reached its God-intended fullness expels servile feargiggol timmuɗo (“complete/perfected love”) — [NEW TERM] CRITICAL (compounding the Critical risk of giggol itself, see 4:8).

4:19 — ἡμεῖς ἀγαπῶμεν, ὅτι αὐτὸς πρῶτος ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
αὐτὸς πρῶτος ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς
autos prōtos ēgapēsen hēmas
”he first loved us”
temporal and causal priority
”he first loved us,” “he loved us first”
Restates 4:10’s priority principle in compressed form — God’s initiating love is the root of all human love for God and othersHigh — the word “first” (hà rawii, adverb of priority) must be retained explicitly; omitting it would allow giggol to collapse into the same reciprocal, response-to-piety framework flagged Critical for arjunde (grace) in the baseline.

4:20 — ἐάν τις εἴπῃ ὅτι ἀγαπῶ τὸν θεόν, καὶ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ μισῇ, ψεύστης ἐστίν· ὁ γὰρ μὴ ἀγαπῶν τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ ὃν ἑώρακεν, τὸν θεὸν ὃν οὐχ ἑώρακεν οὐ δύναται ἀγαπᾶν.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
μισῇ
misē
”hates”
active hostility/enmity, not mere indifference
”hates”
Hatred toward a fellow believer, not mere neutrality, is in viewañde (“to hate”) — [NEW TERM] Low.
ψεύστης
pseustēs
”liar”
one who speaks falsehood
”liar”
Claiming love for God while hating a brother makes the claim itself falsefenoowo (“liar,” from the fen- root shared with baseline’s rejected-alternative “fenaande” for sin) — [NEW TERM] Low-Medium. Appropriate reuse: fenaande was rejected in the baseline only as too weak a substitute for the doctrine of sin; as a plain descriptive term for “lie/liar” it is accurate and low-risk here.
τὸν ἀδελφὸν
ton adelphon
”the brother”
fellow believer
”brother”
The concrete, visible test-case for love of the invisible Godmusiɗɗo (“brother”) — [NEW TERM] Medium. See Chapter 3 doctrine-level note on “love for the brethren” and its interaction with Pulaaku kinship categories.

4:21 — καὶ ταύτην τὴν ἐντολὴν ἔχομεν ἀπʼ αὐτοῦ, ἵνα ὁ ἀγαπῶν τὸν θεὸν ἀγαπᾷ καὶ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ.

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
ἐντολήν
entolēn
”commandment”
authoritative directive
”commandment,” “command”
This is a single, unified commandment (love God + love brother), not two separable rulesyamiroore (reusing the root of [BASELINE REUSE] “yamiroore Linjiila”) — [NEW TERM] Medium. Must be kept distinct from sariya (baseline: Law/Sharia) — this is a relational love-command flowing from new birth, not a legal code to be observed for merit; conflating the two risks pulling this commandment into a Sharia-observance framework.

PART 2 — CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER STUDY OF THE WHOLE BOOK

Chapter 1 (1:1–10)

New load-bearing terms not covered in the core passage:

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
ὁ λόγος τῆς ζωῆς
ho logos tēs zōēs
”the Word of life”
the eternal Logos, source and giver of life (echoes John 1:1, 1:4)
“the Word of life,” “the word which is life”
Christ himself as the eternal, life-giving Word, historically seen, heard, touched — grounding apostolic testimonyKonngol nguurndam (“the Word of life”) — [NEW TERM] CRITICAL. Directly related to the baseline’s incarnation doctrine (Alla wontii neɗɗo). A genuine point of contact exists: the Qur’an (4:171) calls Jesus “a Word from Him” (kalimatun minhu), giving Fulfulde readers an existing category for “Jesus as Word.” This shared vocabulary must not be mistaken for shared belief — the Qur’anic “Word” is not the eternal, personally pre-existent, incarnate Logos of John’s theology. Requires explicit teaching, exactly as the baseline handles Almasiihu.
φανερόω (ἡ ζωὴ ἐφανερώθη)
phaneroō
”was manifested”
disclosure of what was hidden/heavenly into visible historical form
”was manifested,” “appeared”
The eternal life/Word became visible, audible, tangible in historyfeeñinaa — [NEW TERM, see 4:9] High, since applied here directly to the Incarnation itself, inheriting that doctrine’s Critical-adjacent sensitivity.
κοινωνία
koinōnia
”fellowship/shared participation”
shared life, partnership, communion
”fellowship,” “communion,” “partnership”
Fellowship with the apostles is fellowship with the Father and Son — vertical and horizontal fellowship are inseparablediisnondiral — [BASELINE REUSE]. Confirm regional naturalness per baseline’s standing note.
χαρά
chara
”joy”
gladness, delight
”joy”
The purpose of apostolic proclamation is the readers’ shared joyweltaare (“joy”) — [NEW TERM] Low.
ὁ θεὸς φῶς ἐστιν
ho theos phōs estin
”God is light”
ontological identity-statement, parallel in form to 4:8’s “God is love"
"God is light”
God’s essential moral purity and self-revealing natureAlla ko ndaygu[NEW TERM] CRITICAL. The Qur’an’s An-Nur sura (24:35), “Allah is the Light (Nūr) of the heavens and the earth,” and broader Sufi Nūr theology (including doctrines of a primordial “Light of Muhammad,” Nūr Muhammadī) give Fulfulde readers a rich, familiar, but theologically distinct category for divine light. John’s “light” is a moral-relational category (truthfulness, exposure of sin, verses 5-7) rather than a metaphysical-cosmic radiance category; this distinction must be made explicit, not assumed as automatically shared ground.
σκοτία
skotia
”darkness”
absence of light; moral/spiritual corruption
”darkness”
The moral opposite of God’s nature; the sphere of sin and falsehoodniɓe (“darkness”) — [NEW TERM] High, paired directly with the light term above; must retain the moral (not merely physical/temporal) sense.
περιπατέω (ἐν τῷ σκότει περιπατῶμεν)
peripateō
”to walk”
figurative for conduct/manner of life
”walk,” “live,” “conduct ourselves”
Habitual moral conduct, whether in fellowship with God (light) or estrangement from him (darkness)yahde (to walk, figurative) — [NEW TERM] Medium.
ψευδόμεθα
pseudometha
”we lie/we are lying”
falsehood, misrepresentation
”we lie”
Claiming fellowship with God while walking in darkness is itself a liefenaade (verb) — [NEW TERM, root shared with 4:20’s fenoowo] Low.
αἷμα Ἰησοῦ
haima Iēsou
”the blood of Jesus”
sacrificial, atoning blood
”the blood of Jesus,” “his blood”
The concrete atoning agent that cleanses from all sin — the same doctrine as ἱλασμός (4:10) expressed in sacrificial-blood imageryƴiiƴam Yeesu[NEW TERM] CRITICAL. Same doctrinal weight as the baseline’s grace/salvation Critical entries: Islamic theology has no substitutionary-atonement category; sin is addressed by discretionary mercy weighed against deeds, never by sacrificial blood. Must be taught explicitly alongside the ἱλασμός doctrine at 4:10 and 2:2.
ὁμολογῶμεν τὰς ἁμαρτίας
homologōmen tas hamartias
”we confess our sins”
verbal, specific acknowledgment
”confess our sins,” “admit our sins”
Confession, not mere private remorse, is the condition for cleansing (1:9)jaɓen bakkaatuuji amen (reusing the jaɓ- root, see 4:15) — [NEW TERM] High. Must be distinguished from Islamic tawba (repentance), which is a broader process of remorse, cessation, and resolve not to repeat, understood to secure Allah’s forgiveness on its own terms; 1 John 1:9 ties confession specifically and exclusively to cleansing through Christ’s atoning blood (1:7), a christologically-anchored basis tawba does not have.
πιστός καὶ δίκαιος
pistos kai dikaios
”faithful and just” (of God)
trustworthy and righteous
”faithful and just”
God’s own character guarantees that confessed sin will be forgivenπιστός: gomɗinaaɗo (trustworthy, from [BASELINE REUSE root] gomɗinal); δίκαιος: peewɗo (righteous, from [BASELINE REUSE root] peewal) — [NEW TERMS] Medium.
ἀφῇ (τὰς ἁμαρτίας)
aphē
”forgive”
release, remission of a debt/offense
”forgive,” “will forgive”
God’s forgiveness of confessed sinyaafaade (verb; noun yaafuyee, flagged in baseline as “too narrow” a stand-alone gloss for justification but appropriate here for its own concept of forgiveness) — [NEW TERM] Medium-High. Must be taught as flowing from Christ’s atoning blood (1:7), not as a separate, independent mercy-transaction.
καθαρίσῃ
katharisē
”cleanse”
purification from moral defilement
”cleanse,” “purify”
Christ’s blood cleanses from the guilt and defilement of sin — a moral-spiritual cleansing, not rituallaɓɓinde (“to cleanse/purify”) — [NEW TERM] High. The baseline reserves laaɓɗo/laaɓal for ritual/physical cleanliness (relevant to Islamic ablution, wuḍūʾ) and keeps this category distinct from ceniiɗo/ceniinde (moral holiness). 1 John 1:7,9’s cleansing-from-sin-by-blood is a third, related-but-distinct category (a punctiliar cleansing from guilt through atonement, not the ongoing process ceniinde denotes, nor mere ritual washing); this must be explicitly taught as neither of the other two categories, to avoid readers mapping it onto wuḍūʾ-style ablution.

Chapter 2 (2:1–29)

New load-bearing terms not covered above:

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
τεκνία / παιδία
teknia / paidia
”little children”
affectionate pastoral address
”my little children,” “dear children”
John’s pastoral, fatherly tone toward his readersɓiɓɓe (“little ones/children,” term of endearment) — [NEW TERM] Low.
παράκλητος
paraklētos
”advocate/one who pleads on another’s behalf”
legal advocate, intercessor, comforter (same word used of the Holy Spirit in John’s Gospel)
“advocate,” “intercessor,” “one who speaks to the Father in our defense”
Christ himself as believers’ advocate before the Father when they sintorɗo wonande men e Baaba (building on [BASELINE REUSE root] “torgol wonande,” intercession) — [NEW TERM] High. Must be distinguished carefully from the Islamic concept of shafā’a (intercession, chiefly of prophets/saints at judgment) — a doctrine itself contested within Islamic schools (embraced by many Sufi-influenced traditions, more cautiously received or rejected by reform-minded/Salafi-influenced currents with real presence in Fulani Islamic scholarship). This term risks being read either as confirming a mediating-saint framework or, among reform-minded readers, being rejected outright as shirk-adjacent; requires explicit theological framing either way.
Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν δίκαιον
Iēsoun Christon dikaion
”Jesus Christ the righteous [one]“
title emphasizing Christ’s sinless righteousness, qualifying him as advocate
”Jesus Christ the Righteous One”
Christ’s own righteousness (not the believer’s) qualifies him to advocateYeesu Kiristu, Peewɗo — reuses [BASELINE REUSE] peewal root; High.
ἱλασμός (repeated, 2:2)
hilasmos
”propitiation”
as at 4:10
”propitiation,” “atoning sacrifice”
Christ’s atonement is universal in scope (“for the whole world”)See 4:10 — CRITICAL, rendered identically.
τηρεῖν τὰς ἐντολάς
tērein tas entolas
”to keep the commandments”
ongoing obedience
”keep his commandments,” “obey his commands”
Obedience as the evidence, not the ground, of knowing Christreende yamirooje (“to guard/keep commandments,” reend- = “to guard/keep,” reusing [NEW TERM] yamiroore) — Medium.
ὁ κόσμος / ἡ ἐπιθυμία τῆς σαρκός / ἡ ἐπιθυμία τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν / ἡ ἀλαζονεία τοῦ βίου
ho kosmos / hē epithymia tēs sarkos / tōn ophthalmōn / hē alazoneia tou biou
”the world / lust of the flesh / lust of the eyes / pride of life”
the world-system opposed to God, and its threefold characteristic desires
”the world,” “lust of the flesh,” “lust of the eyes,” “pride of life”
The world (as moral-spiritual system, not creation itself) and its disordered desires must not be loved, as they are incompatible with love for the Fatheraduna (world) — [NEW TERM] High: aduna (Arabic-derived, shared with Islamic dunyā) carries the existing dunyā/ākhira (this-world/hereafter) dichotomy familiar from regional Islamic ethical teaching — a genuine point of contact for an ascetic-adjacent warning, but must be distinguished from a purely temporal/material category; John’s “world” is a moral-spiritual system in active opposition to God’s love, not merely “this present life” as opposed to “the next life.” “Lust of the flesh” → tuuyo ɓanndu; “lust of the eyes” → tuuyo gite; “pride of life” → mantoore nguurndam — each [NEW TERM] Medium, with “pride” (mantoore) requiring care to distinguish sinful worldly boastfulness from the legitimate Pulaaku value of teddungal (dignity/honor), which the baseline already flags as needing to be kept distinct from divine glory (manaango).
ἀντίχριστος
antichristos
”antichrist” (against/instead-of Christ)
one who opposes or falsely claims to be Christ; in 1 John, specifically those denying the incarnation and Christ’s messianic identity — plural (“many antichrists”) describing a present, ongoing category, not one future individual
”antichrist,” “the antichrist”
Present deniers of Christ’s true identity, evidenced by having left the community of true believersgaño Almasiihu (“enemy/opponent of the Messiah”) — [NEW TERM] CRITICAL. Fulfulde readers are very likely to map this term onto al-Dajjāl, the Islamic eschatological deceiver-figure well known across Sahelian Islamic teaching, who appears once, near the end of time. This is a real point of partial contact (both traditions expect a great deceiver) but the content differs sharply: John describes many antichrists already active in his own day, identified specifically by their denial of the incarnation (2:22-23; 4:2-3), not a single end-times figure. This must be explicitly taught to prevent readers from either dismissing the doctrine as “not yet relevant” (since Dajjāl hasn’t appeared) or collapsing the two figures into one.
χρῖσμα
chrisma
”anointing”
the endowment/gift received from the Holy Spirit, which teaches truth
”anointing,” “the anointing you received”
The Holy Spirit’s abiding teaching ministry in every believer, not an elite class of specially-anointed teachersƴiƴŋal Ruuhu Ceniiɗo (“anointing of the Holy Spirit”) — [NEW TERM] High. Must never be confused with barke (the baseline’s forbidden-substitution term for grace/power/gifts — the widespread West African Islamic-Sufi concept of blessing/spiritual power associated with marabouts). The anointing in 2:20,27 is the Spirit’s gift to every believer, categorically different from a person-mediated barke transferred through a religious specialist.
ἀρνεῖται
arneitai
”denies”
explicit rejection/repudiation
”denies,” “disowns”
Denying that Jesus is the Christ, or denying the Father and the Son together, is the defining mark of the antichrist spirityeddude (“to deny/refuse”) — [NEW TERM] High. Note the doctrinal inversion at stake: Islamic Tawhid theology itself formally “denies” the Son in the Trinitarian/incarnational sense (echoing Qur’an 112); this verse’s condemnation of “denying the Son” is therefore a direct, unavoidable point of confrontation with mainstream regional Islamic doctrine, not merely with a marginal heresy as in John’s original context.
ἐπαγγελία
epaggelia
”promise”
a pledge, assurance of future fulfillment
”promise”
The promise of eternal life given by the Sonalkawal[BASELINE REUSE] (already used in baseline for “covenant/promise”).
ὁ Χριστός (“Ἰησοῦς ἐστιν ὁ Χριστός,” 2:22)
ho Christos
”the Christ” (title, articular)
the promised Messiah
”the Christ,” “the Messiah”
The specific messianic-identity claim being denied by the “antichrists”Almasiihu[BASELINE REUSE], used here specifically as the contested title (distinguishing from “Yeesu Kiristu” as the plain proper name — see glossary note).

Chapter 3 (3:1–24)

New load-bearing terms not covered above:

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
τέκνα θεοῦ
tekna theou
”children of God”
believers’ derived, adoptive sonship — a different Greek word from υἱός/huios used exclusively of Christ
”children of God,” “sons of God” (some versions)
Believers become God’s children by adoption/new birth; this status is a gift of the Father’s love (3:1)ɓiɓɓe Alla (“children of God,” plural) — [NEW TERM] CRITICAL. This term must be kept rigorously distinct from [BASELINE REUSE, singular, reserved] Ɓiɗɗo Alla, which is enforced exclusively for Christ’s unique, eternal, co-equal Sonship (baseline sonship_of_christ, Critical). John himself makes this distinction in Greek (tekna vs. huios); Fulfulde translation must preserve it structurally, or two serious errors follow: (a) diluting Christ’s unique Sonship by implying believers share the identical status, which would hand Islamic Tawhid objections easy ammunition (“even Christians admit many ‘sons of God’”), or (b) under-translating believers’ real, Spirit-given filial status. Build explicitly on the baseline’s adoption doctrine (jaɓugol wonande ɓiɗɗo) to anchor ɓiɓɓe Alla as adoptive, not ontologically identical to Christ’s Sonship.
φανερωθῇ (3:2)
phanerōthē
”is/will be revealed”
as above
”is revealed,” “appears”
Future revelation of believers’ full likeness to Christfeeñinaa — [NEW TERM, see above] Medium.
ἀνομία
anomia
”lawlessness”
rejection of/rebellion against God’s law
”lawlessness,” “transgression of the law”
Sin defined at its root as rebellion against God’s moral ordertooñange sariya (“violation of the law,” building on [BASELINE REUSE root] sariya) — [NEW TERM] Medium.
σπέρμα αὐτοῦ
sperma autou
”his seed”
the generative, abiding principle of new birth planted by God
”his seed,” “God’s nature,” “God’s seed”
The regenerating, sin-resisting principle God plants in the believergeɗal Alla (“God’s seed,” reusing the [BASELINE REUSE root] “geɗal Daawuda,” seed of David) — [NEW TERM] Medium. A deliberate morphological echo: as the Messiah’s physical lineage is “geɗal Daawuda,” the believer’s spiritual regeneration is “geɗal Alla” — a resonant, consistent image for a culture with strong lineage/genealogy values.
Κάϊν
Kain
”Cain”
proper name
”Cain”
Negative moral exemplar — hatred of a brother leading to murderKayinu[NEW TERM] Low (proper name, transliterated).
ἀνθρωποκτόνος
anthrōpoktonos
”murderer”
one who kills a human being
”murderer”
Hatred is morally equated with murder in its root dispositionwaroowo (“killer/murderer”) — [NEW TERM] Low.
τίθημι τὴν ψυχήν
tithēmi tēn psychēn
”to lay down one’s life”
sacrificial self-giving, following Christ’s pattern
”lay down his life,” “give his life”
The pattern of Christ’s sacrificial love that believers are called to imitate toward the brethrenwaɗde nguurndam mun wonande (“to lay down/give one’s life for”) — [NEW TERM] Medium. This sacrificial-courage image resonates positively with Pulaaku’s valuing of courage and self-sacrifice for the community — a genuine bridge, though the object here (dying for fellow believers specifically) should be made explicit rather than assumed as generic communal heroism.
τὰ σπλάγχνα
ta splagchna
”the inward parts/bowels” (seat of compassion in ancient idiom)
deep compassion/pity
”compassion,” “bowels of compassion” (KJV)
Withholding compassion from a brother in need contradicts the claim to have God’s loveyurmeende — [BASELINE REUSE] (baseline reserves this for “mercy/compassion” generally; consistent usage here).
παρρησία (πρὸς τὸν θεόν)
parrēsia
”confidence/boldness” (before God, in prayer)
as at 4:17
”confidence,” “boldness”
Confidence in prayer flowing from a clean conscience and obedient lovehardeende — [NEW TERM, see 4:17] Medium.
διάβολος
diabolos
”the devil” (slanderer/accuser)
the personal adversary, source of sin and murder (contrasted with the children of God)
“the devil”
Cain, and all who hate, are morally aligned with the devil rather than GodIbliisa (Arabic-derived, shared with Islamic Iblīs) — [NEW TERM] Medium. A genuine point of shared vocabulary and broadly compatible category (a personal, rebellious spiritual adversary); the differing origin-narratives (Iblīs’s refusal to bow before Adam, versus the biblical Satan/serpent narrative) are a secondary teaching point, not a translation-substitution risk.

Chapter 4 (4:1–6; verses 7–21 treated in full above)

New load-bearing terms in 4:1–6 not covered in the core passage section:

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
δοκιμάζετε τὰ πνεύματα
dokimazete ta pneumata
”test/examine the spirits”
discernment/testing for authenticity, as one tests metal for purity
”test the spirits”
Believers must discern which teachings/teachers are truly from God, by a specific doctrinal test (confession of the incarnation)ɗaɓɓitde ruuhuuji (“to test/examine spirits”) — [NEW TERM] CRITICAL. This is one of the most culturally sensitive renderings in the letter: “testing spirits” (plural, lowercase, generic ruuhu) risks being popularly read through the lens of jinn-discernment and exorcism practices carried out by marabouts across Fulani and neighboring communities — a real, active folk-Islamic practice distinct from John’s meaning. It must be explicitly taught that these “spirits” are teaching-spirits behind human prophets/teachers, tested by a specific doctrinal confession (4:2), not spirit-beings to be exorcised or divined about. This is not the Holy Spirit (Ruuhu Ceniiɗo, capitalized, singular) — lowercase, plural, generic ruuhu is deliberately distinct and must never be confused with it (cf. baseline’s standing caution that unqualified ruuhu is “broadly ambiguous”).
ψευδοπροφῆται
pseudoprophētai
”false prophets”
those who falsely claim divine inspiration
”false prophets”
Many false prophets/teachers had arisen, requiring the test aboveannabi fenaaɗo (“false prophet,” reusing [BASELINE REUSE root] annabi) — [NEW TERM] High. Given the exceptional weight and prestige of prophetic authority in regional Islamic self-understanding (including Muhammad’s status as the final prophet/“seal of the prophets”), this phrase requires careful contextual framing: John’s “false prophets” are specific historical opponents denying the incarnation (docetic/proto-Gnostic teachers), not a general polemic against religious teachers of other traditions across history. Teaching materials must state this scope explicitly to avoid the doctrine being read as a blanket claim about prophetic figures generally.
πᾶν πνεῦμα ὃ ὁμολογεῖ Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν ἐν σαρκὶ ἐληλυθότα
pan pneuma ho homologei Iēsoun Christon en sarki elēlythota
”every spirit that confesses Jesus Christ having come in the flesh”
doctrinal test: affirmation of the genuine, real incarnation
”confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh”
The doctrinal litmus test for authentic teaching is affirmation of the real incarnationReuses [BASELINE REUSE] Alla wontii neɗɗo (incarnation) + jaɓa (confess, see 4:15) + ɓanndu (“flesh/body,” distinct sense from “lust of the flesh” in 2:16 — here the fact of bodily human existence, not disordered desire) — CRITICAL, compounding the baseline’s Critical incarnation doctrine with the Critical confession vocabulary of 4:15. This is the single sharpest doctrinal flashpoint in the letter for a Fulfulde-speaking Islamic audience, for whom God assuming flesh is shirk by definition; must be taught with direct, careful, non-evasive explanation exactly as the baseline instructs for incarnation.
τὸ πνεῦμα τῆς ἀληθείας / τὸ πνεῦμα τῆς πλάνης
to pneuma tēs alētheias / tēs planēs
”the spirit of truth / the spirit of error”
contrasting sources of inspiration — divine versus deceptive
”spirit of truth,” “spirit of error/falsehood”
The ultimate spiritual source behind true and false teachingruuhu goonga / ruuhu majjere[NEW TERM] High, same jinn-discernment caution as “testing the spirits” above applies.

Chapter 5 (5:1–21)

New load-bearing terms not covered above:

TermsVariantsContextual theological meaningFulfulde rendering & risk
νικᾷ τὸν κόσμον
nika ton kosmon
”overcomes/conquers the world”
victory, defeat of an opposing power
”overcomes the world,” “conquers the world”
Victory over the world’s opposition to God is achieved through faith, not human strength or strategyfoolde aduna (“to conquer/overcome the world,” foold- = “to conquer”) — [NEW TERM] High. “Foold-” carries strong military-conquest resonance in a region with living historical memory of the 19th-century Fulani-led Sokoto Caliphate’s jihad campaigns; this doctrine must be explicitly taught as moral-spiritual victory through faith (5:4-5), never suggesting political or military conquest, to avoid the term being co-opted into a religio-political conquest narrative.
ἡ νίκη
hē nikē
”the victory”
as above
”the victory”
The specific means of victory: faithfooleeru (“victory”) — [NEW TERM] Medium.
τὸ ὕδωρ καὶ τὸ αἷμα (καὶ τὸ πνεῦμα)
to hydōr kai to haima (kai to pneuma)
“the water and the blood (and the Spirit)“
three witnesses testifying to Christ’s identity
”water and blood,” “Spirit, water, and blood”
Threefold testimony to who Jesus isndiyam (water) / ƴiiƴam (blood, reuse) / Ruuhu (Spirit, reuse) — [NEW TERM] Medium-High: the triadic structure of “three that testify” adds a further, subtler Trinitarian-adjacent dimension to a text already carrying heavy Trinitarian freight elsewhere in the letter; teaching materials should note this without over-reading it doctrinally beyond the text’s own claim (testimony to Christ, not an explicit Trinity formula).
μαρτυρία (τοῦ θεοῦ)
martyria (tou theou)
“testimony (of God)“
witness/evidence
”testimony,” “witness”
God’s own testimony concerning his Son is the ground of certain faithseedaagal (noun form of seedaade, see 4:14) — [NEW TERM] High, same shahāda-adjacent caution noted at 4:14/4:15.
ζωὴν αἰώνιον (repeated across ch.5)
zōēn aiōnion
”eternal life”
life that is unending, of the age to come, possessed now
”eternal life,” “everlasting life”
Eternal life is a present possession of those who have the Son (5:11-13), not solely a future rewardnguurndam duumiiɗam (“eternal/lasting life”) — [NEW TERM] High. Consistent with the baseline’s salvation Critical caution: Islamic eschatology understands entry to paradise (aljanna) as a future reward contingent on Allah’s mercy weighed against a lifetime of deeds; 1 John 5:11-13’s claim that eternal life is already possessed by believers in the present, on the basis of having the Son, must be stated explicitly as a present-tense certainty, not softened into a future hope alone.
ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον
hamartia pros thanaton
”sin unto/leading to death”
a specific category of sin John distinguishes from sin in general (5:16-17)
“sin that leads to death,” “mortal sin”
A pastoral-care distinction, not a fixed checklist of unforgivable sinsbakkaatu yahdi e maayde (descriptive, reusing [BASELINE REUSE] bakkaatu) — [NEW TERM] Medium. Requires careful pastoral framing to avoid readers constructing an anxious checklist of “unforgivable sins.”
εἴδωλα
eidōla
”idols”
objects of false worship
”idols”
Final exhortation: guard against idolatrysanamuuji (Arabic-derived, shared with Islamic anti-shirk vocabulary) — [NEW TERM] High. A double-edged term: it names genuine common ground (both traditions strongly condemn idol-worship), but this very shared conviction creates risk that a sophisticated reader could turn the term back on the Trinitarian/incarnational content of this same letter, framing devotion to Christ-as-God as itself a form of shirk/idolatry. This tension should be anticipated directly in teaching materials, not left for the reader to raise unaddressed.

End of semantic analysis. See 08_core_glossary.md for the consolidated per-term glossary table covering all chapters.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words