Semantic Analysis: Philemon (English → Sanskrit)

Curriculum: Philemon Core passage: Philemon 1:8–21 Method note: Philemon is a single-chapter epistle of 25 verses. Per the Phase 1 mandate, this analysis therefore covers the entire book — vv.1–7 (opening/thanksgiving) and vv.22–25 (closing greetings), in addition to the verse-by-verse treatment of the core passage vv.8–21 — so that no verse of the book is silently omitted. Where a term already carries a fixed Sanskrit rendering in the baseline Romans translation_memory.json, that rendering is reused exactly and marked [REUSED]; new terms required by Philemon’s distinct vocabulary are marked [NEW] and proposed here for adoption into the shared translation memory going forward.

---

Doctrinal Framing

Philemon’s five curriculum doctrines map onto the letter as follows:

Doctrine	Primary verses	Key Greek terms
Forgiveness and Reconciliation	1:10–19	ὀφείλω, ἀδικέω, ἐλλογάω, ἀποτίνω
Christian Brotherhood across Social Status	1:1–2, 1:7, 1:16, 1:20	ἀδελφός, ἀγαπητός
Slavery and the Gospel’s Transforming Power	1:11, 1:15–17	δοῦλος, ἐλεύθερος (implied), ἀδελφός
Intercession and Appeal on Behalf of Another	1:8–10, 1:17–20	παρακαλῶ, κοινωνός, προσλαβοῦ
Grace-Motivated Obedience	1:14, 1:21	ἑκούσιον, ἀνάγκη, ὑπακοή

---

Core Passage: Philemon 1:8–21 (verse-by-verse)

Verse 8

Greek: διὰ τοῦτο πολλὴν παρρησίαν ἔχων ἐν Χριστῷ ἐπιτάσσειν σοι τὸ ἀνῆκον

• παρρησία (parrēsia) — lit. “all-speech, freedom of speech”; range: boldness, frankness, confident authority to speak. English variants: boldness, confidence, freedom of speech. Theological meaning here: Paul’s apostolic authority which he sets aside in favor of appeal. Rendering risk: [NEW] धृष्टता (dhṣṛṭatā) or निर्भयवचनम् (nirbhayavacanam, “fearless speech”). Medium — no major classical-school collision, but must not be rendered with a term implying arrogance; propose निर्भयवचनम्.
• ἐπιτάσσω (epitassō) — lit. “to arrange upon, command”; range: order, command with authority. Rendering: [NEW] आदेशः (ādeśaḥ, command/order). Low — plain administrative-authority term, no doctrinal collision. Contrast set up with the next verse’s παρακαλῶ (appeal) — Paul explicitly declines to use ἐπιτάσσω-force, an important discourse feature for the Intercession/Appeal doctrine that must survive translation (Paul could command; he chooses to appeal).

Verse 9

Greek: διὰ τὴν ἀγάπην μᾶλλον παρακαλῶ, τοιοῦτος ὢν ὡς Παῦλος πρεσβύτης, νυνὶ δὲ καὶ δέσμιος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ

• ἀγάπη (agapē) — lit. self-giving love; range: covenantal, sacrificial, willed love (distinct from ἔρως or φιλία). English variants: love, charity (KJV). Theological meaning: the ground of Paul’s appeal — love, not command, motivates the request; this is the doctrinal engine of “Grace-Motivated Obedience.” Rendering risk: [NEW — proposed addition to shared translation memory] प्रेम (prema). High — प्रेम is not a doctrinally neutral Sanskrit word: in Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava theology (Rūpa Gosvāmī’s Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu), prema names the ripened, ecstatic culmination of the bhakti path (progressing śraddhā → sādhu-saṅga → bhajana-kriyā → anartha-nivṛtti → niṣṭhā → ruci → āsakti → prema), a mystical rasa-experience of loving union with Kṛṣṇa. Using प्रेम for ἀγάπη risks the reader hearing covenantal, self-giving love as an emotional/aesthetic devotional attainment rather than a willed, ethical, others-directed love that can command obedience-in-love toward a fellow human being. Alternatives considered: स्नेह (sneha, affection — too weak, mainly familial fondness) and अनुराग (anurāga — also technical in rasa-aesthetics and listed among the kleśas’ rāga in Yoga Sūtra 2.7, rejected for the same reason). प्रेम is retained as the least-worse option, following Christian Sanskrit precedent, but requires an explicit redefinition note at first occurrence: “willed, self-giving covenant love, not the bhakti-rasa culmination of devotional ecstasy.”
• παρακαλῶ (parakaleō) — see “exhort” in baseline (उत्तेजनम्/विनयः, context-sensitive). Here the “entreaty” sense is active. [REUSED] विनयः (vinayaḥ). Medium, per baseline’s existing context note.
• πρεσβύτης (presbytēs) — lit. “old man, elder” (some MSS read πρέσβυς, “ambassador” — a well-known text-critical variant that matters for how Paul’s authority is framed). Rendering: [NEW] वृद्धः (vṛddhaḥ, elder) with a translator note on the ambassador variant. Low doctrinal risk, but flag the text-critical ambiguity for scholarly review.
• δέσμιος (desmios) — lit. “bound one, prisoner.” Rendering: [NEW] बन्दी (bandī). Low-Medium — straightforward, but should not be rendered with a term implying criminal guilt (Paul’s imprisonment is for the gospel, cf. 1:13’s τοῖς δεσμοῖς τοῦ εὐαγγελίου).

Verse 10

Greek: παρακαλῶ σε περὶ τοῦ ἐμοῦ τέκνου, ὃν ἐγέννησα ἐν τοῖς δεσμοῖς, Ὀνήσιμον

• τέκνον (teknon) — lit. “child”; range: biological or spiritual offspring. Theological meaning: Onesimus as Paul’s spiritual child through gospel ministry. Rendering: [NEW] पुत्रः (putraḥ). Medium — must be explicitly distinguished from the baseline’s “adoption” doctrine (पुत्रत्वेन स्वीकरणम्, God’s adoption of believers as sons with full inheritance); this is Paul’s pastoral spiritual-fatherhood metaphor for a convert, a related but categorically distinct sense.
• γεννάω (gennaō) — lit. “to beget, father.” Rendering: [NEW] जनितवान् (janitavān, “I have begotten”). Medium — same distinction as above must be flagged: not the Father’s eternal begetting of the Son (cf. baseline “son_of_god” entry) nor divine regeneration proper, but Paul’s figurative spiritual paternity through evangelism.
• Ὀνήσιμος (Onēsimos) — proper name, meaning “useful, profitable” (from ὀνίνημι, “to profit/benefit”). [NEW] ओनेसिमः (onesimaḥ), transliterated per Serampore-tradition practice for proper names. Low risk lexically, but the name’s meaning sets up the wordplay of vv.11 and 20 — flagged for translator note since the pun is untranslatable in Devanagari transliteration alone.

Verse 11

Greek: τὸν ποτέ σοι ἄχρηστον νυνὶ δὲ σοὶ καὶ ἐμοὶ εὔχρηστον

• ἄχρηστος / εὔχρηστος (achrēstos / euchrēstos) — lit. “unuseful / well-useful.” Rendering: [NEW] निरुपयोगी / उपयोगी (nirupayogī / upayogī). Low doctrinal risk; the term itself is plain, but this verse is the first half of Paul’s wordplay on Onesimus’s name and must be flagged with a translator note: “the Greek plays on Onesimus’s name (= ‘useful’); no Sanskrit lexical equivalent preserves the pun, so the wordplay must be explained in an accompanying note rather than reproduced.”

Verse 12

Greek: ὃν ἀνέπεμψά σοι, τοῦτ’ ἔστιν τὰ ἐμὰ σπλάγχνα

• σπλάγχνα (splanchna) — lit. “inward parts, entrails, bowels”; range: Hebraic/Koine idiom for the seat of deep affection, compassion, love. English variants: “my very heart” (ESV), “bowels” (KJV, archaic). Theological meaning: Paul’s deep personal affection for Onesimus, making the appeal deeply relational rather than merely administrative. Rendering risk: [NEW] हृदयम् (hṛdayam, heart). Medium — Sanskrit has no “bowels of compassion” idiom; हृदयम् (heart) is the safe, non-technical choice. Explicitly rejected: अन्तःकरणम् (antaḥkaraṇam), which is a precise Sāṃkhya/Vedānta technical term for the “inner instrument” (comprising manas, buddhi, citta, ahaṃkāra) — using it here would import an unrelated psychological-metaphysical apparatus into a simple expression of affection.
• ἀναπέμπω (anapempō) — “send back/up.” [NEW] प्रत्यर्पितवान् (pratyarpitavān, “sent back”). Low.

Verse 13

Greek: ὃν ἐγὼ ἐβουλόμην πρὸς ἐμαυτὸν κατέχειν, ἵνα ὑπὲρ σοῦ μοι διακονῇ ἐν τοῖς δεσμοῖς τοῦ εὐαγγελίου

• διακονέω (diakoneō) — “to serve, minister.” [NEW] सेवां कुर्यात् (sevāṃ kuryāt). Low-Medium — plain service term; watch that it not be rendered with a term implying ritual temple-service (e.g. avoid पूजा-family words).
• εὐαγγέλιον (euangelion) — [REUSED] सुसमाचारः (susamācāraḥ), per baseline. High, per baseline’s existing Gospel doctrine entry.
• κατέχω (katechō) — “hold fast, retain.” [NEW] धारयितुम् (dhārayitum). Low.

Verse 14

Greek: χωρὶς δὲ τῆς σῆς γνώμης οὐδὲν ἤθελον ποιῆσαι, ἵνα μὴ ὡς κατὰ ἀνάγκην τὸ ἀγαθόν σου ᾗ ἀλλὰ κατὰ ἑκούσιον

• ἑκούσιον (hekousion) — lit. “voluntary, of one’s own will.” Theological meaning: the heart of “Grace-Motivated Obedience” — Philemon’s good act toward Onesimus must arise freely, not under compulsion. Rendering risk: [NEW] स्वेच्छया (svecchayā, “by one’s own will”). High — this term stands in deliberate contrast to ἀνάγκη below, and that very contrast collides with Pūrva Mīmāṃsā’s vidhi-niyoga theory (already flagged for “law”/विधिः in the baseline), in which scripturally enjoined duty carries binding, non-optional force (niyoga) irrespective of the agent’s private will. Philemon’s action must be understood as not performed under vidhi-like scriptural compulsion but as a freely willed act flowing from love and gospel-transformed character — precisely the same theological point the baseline’s “law” and “obedience_of_faith” entries make regarding Torah-obedience versus faith-obedience. This connection should be made explicit in translator notes.
• ἀνάγκη (anankē) — “necessity, compulsion, constraint.” [NEW] आवश्यकता / बलात्कारः (āvaśyakatā / balātkāraḥ, “compulsion”). Medium-High, paired with the above; must not be rendered with निःयोग/विधि-family vocabulary, which would actively invoke rather than avoid the Mīmāṃsā collision.
• γνώμη (gnōmē) — “consent, opinion, will.” [NEW] अनुमतिः (anumatiḥ, consent). Low.

Verse 15

Greek: τάχα γὰρ διὰ τοῦτο ἐχωρίσθη πρὸς ὥραν, ἵνα αἰώνιον αὐτὸν ἀπέχῃς

• αἰώνιος (aiōnios) — lit. “age-long, eternal”; range: here used practically (“for good, permanently”) rather than in its fullest eschatological sense. Rendering: [NEW] नित्यम् / सदा (nityam/sadā, permanently/forever). Medium — must be distinguished in translator notes from the baseline’s eschatological uses of “eternal” elsewhere (e.g. resurrection life); here it denotes a permanent restored relationship in this life and beyond, not a technical soteriological category, and certainly not the mokṣa-adjacent “eternity” language the baseline warns against for “salvation.”
• χωρίζω (chōrizō) — “separate, depart.” [NEW] वियुक्तः (viyuktaḥ). Low.
• ἀπέχω (apechō) — “have back, possess fully.” [NEW] प्राप्नुयाः (prāpnuyāḥ). Low.

Verse 16

Greek: οὐκέτι ὡς δοῦλον ἀλλ’ ὑπὲρ δοῦλον, ἀδελφὸν ἀγαπητόν, μάλιστα ἐμοί, πόσῳ δὲ μᾶλλον σοί, καὶ ἐν σαρκὶ καὶ ἐν κυρίῳ

This verse is the theological hinge of the entire letter and of two curriculum doctrines simultaneously (Slavery/Gospel’s Transforming Power; Christian Brotherhood across Social Status).

• δοῦλος (doulos) — lit. “slave, bondservant”; range: one legally owned and obligated to serve another, without personal legal freedom. English variants: slave, bondservant, servant (softened in some translations). Theological meaning: Onesimus’s actual prior social-legal status, which the gospel does not merely soften but transforms in status (“no longer as a slave but more than a slave”). Rendering risk: [NEW — proposed addition, Critical tier] दासः (dāsaḥ). Critical — this is the single highest-stakes lexical choice in the book, for two compounding reasons. (1) दासः is the ordinary Sanskrit word for chattel/bonded slave/servant and carries the weight of the historical varṇāśrama social order, in which a person’s dāsa-status (or śūdra varṇa) is treated in dharmaśāstra literature (e.g. Manusmṛti) as a stable, often birth-fixed social category — the very opposite of Paul’s claim that the gospel reclassifies a δοῦλος as ἀδελφός. (2) दास is simultaneously a major positive devotional-technical term in bhakti theology: dāsya-bhāva, one of the five classical devotee-relationships to a personal deity (śānta, dāsya, sakhya, vātsalya, mādhurya) in Vaiṣṇava rasa-theology, in which calling oneself “dāsa” of God (cf. names like Rāmadāsa, Tulsīdās) is a mark of devotional humility, not degradation. Neither collision is avoidable by word substitution — no Sanskrit term escapes both the social-status weight and the devotional-technical weight simultaneously. The translation must therefore retain दासः (there is no safer synonym) but require an explicit note at every occurrence in this letter distinguishing: (a) Onesimus’s real, non-metaphorical social-legal bondage from dāsya-bhāva’s voluntary devotional self-designation, and (b) the letter’s claim that the gospel does not merely add a devotional layer on top of unchanged social status, but reclassifies the relationship itself — “no longer as a slave” — a claim that stands in real tension with, and must not be softened into harmony with, dharmaśāstra’s treatment of varṇa/dāsa status as fixed.
• ἀδελφός (adelphos) — lit. “brother.” Rendering: [NEW — proposed addition, High tier] भ्राता (bhrātā). High — the lexical item itself is not technically encumbered, but its doctrinal use here directly and explicitly challenges the varṇa-hierarchical premise (already flagged as High/Critical risk under the baseline’s “unity_of_jews_and_gentiles” and “universal_human_accountability” doctrines) that ritual and social status are stable, birth-determined, and non-transferable. Calling a δοῦλος a full ἀδελφός “both in the flesh and in the Lord” is the most socially concrete instance in the New Testament of the leveling claim Romans makes in the abstract (cf. Romans 10:12, “no distinction”). Must be translated without softening.
• ἀγαπητός (agapētos) — “beloved,” from the same root as ἀγάπη (v.9). [NEW] प्रियः (priyaḥ) or प्रेमास्पदः (premāspadaḥ, “object of love,” matching the प्रेम choice above). Medium, inherits the same collision-risk profile as ἀγάπη but at reduced severity since it is adjectival, not the doctrine-bearing noun itself.
• σάρξ (sarx) — “flesh,” here meaning “in the natural/social realm” as opposed to ἐν κυρίῳ (“in the Lord,” the spiritual realm). [NEW] शरीरतः / मांसतः (śarīrataḥ). Medium — must not be confused with the baseline’s “humanity_of_christ” usage of flesh-language (Christ’s real physical human nature); here it denotes ordinary social/bodily relationship, a different sense of the same word requiring separate contextual glossing.
• κύριος (kyrios) — [REUSED] प्रभुः (prabhuḥ), per baseline “lord” entry. Critical, per baseline.

Verse 17

Greek: εἰ οὖν με ἔχεις κοινωνόν, προσλαβοῦ αὐτὸν ὡς ἐμέ

• κοινωνός (koinōnos) — lit. “partner, sharer,” cognate with κοινωνία (“fellowship,” already [REUSED] सहभागिता per baseline). [NEW] सहभागी (sahabhāgī, “one who shares”). Medium — inherits baseline’s caution that सहभागिता-family terms must not be read as the specific satsaṅga devotional-gathering institution of Vaiṣṇava bhakti; here it functions simply as “business/ministry partner,” reinforcing the Intercession/Appeal doctrine (Paul asks Philemon to receive Onesimus as he would receive Paul himself).
• προσλαμβάνω (proslambanō) — “receive, welcome to oneself.” [NEW] आदरेण स्वीकुर्यात् (ādareṇa svīkuryāt, “receive with honor”). Medium — the choice of verb must convey full welcome, not merely tolerance, reinforcing the Christian Brotherhood doctrine.

Verse 18

Greek: εἰ δέ τι ἠδίκησέν σε ἢ ὀφείλει, τοῦτο ἐμοὶ ἐλλόγα

• ἀδικέω (adikeō) — “to wrong, do injustice to.” [NEW] अन्यायं कृतवान् (anyāyaṃ kṛtavān). Medium.
• ὀφείλω (opheilō) — lit. “to owe (a debt).” Rendering risk: [NEW] ऋणी (ṛṇī, “indebted”) / ऋणम् (ṛṇam, “debt,” noun). High — ऋण is not a doctrinally neutral commercial word in Sanskrit religious literature; it is the term underlying the classical doctrine of ṛṇatraya, the “three debts” every twice-born male is dharmaśāstrically obligated to discharge (debt to the ṛṣis through Veda-study, to the gods through yajña, to the ancestors through progeny). Using ऋणम् here risks the reader hearing Onesimus’s “debt” to Philemon within this ritual-obligation framework rather than as a simple, personal, repayable financial/moral wrong. Must be paired with a note clarifying this is an ordinary personal debt, not a cosmic-ritual one.
• ἐλλογάω (ellogaō) — lit. “to charge to one’s account, credit/impute” — a rare, technical accounting term. Theological significance: this verb is in the same root-family (λόγος/λογ-) as ἐλογίσθη in Romans 4:3 (“counted/imputed… for righteousness”), the very verb underlying the baseline’s Critical-tier “imputed_righteousness” doctrine (आरोपिता धार्मिकता). Paul’s request — “charge that to my account” — is a small, concrete, personal-finance picture of the very substitutionary-imputation logic that Romans develops as full atonement doctrine: another’s debt transferred to, and borne by, one who did not incur it. Rendering risk: [NEW] मयि आरोपयतु (mayi āropayatu, “let it be charged/imputed to me”), deliberately built on the same आरोप- root the baseline uses for imputed righteousness. High — this cross-reference should be made explicit in a translator note, since it is one of the richest doctrinal parallels in the letter and its force is lost if a generic “count it against me” idiom is chosen instead of the आरोप-root term that echoes the baseline’s existing imputation vocabulary.

Verse 19

Greek: ἐγὼ Παῦλος ἔγραψα τῇ ἐμῇ χειρί, ἐγὼ ἀποτίσω· ἵνα μὴ λέγω σοι ὅτι καὶ σεαυτὸν μοι προσοφείλεις

• ἀποτίνω (apotinō) — “to pay back in full, repay a debt.” [NEW] प्रतिदास्यामि (pratidāsyāmi, “I will repay”). Medium-High — continues the imputation/substitution picture of v.18; should be glossed together with ἐλλογάω as a single doctrinal unit in review notes.
• προσοφείλω (prosopheilō) — “to owe besides, owe in addition.” [NEW] अधिकं ऋणी (adhikaṃ ṛṇī). Medium, same ऋण-caution as v.18 applies.
• χειρί (“with my own hand”) — a formulaic authentication marker (cf. Galatians 6:11, 1 Corinthians 16:21); [NEW] स्वहस्तेन (svahastena). Low, no doctrinal weight, epistolary convention.

Verse 20

Greek: ναί, ἀδελφέ, ἐγώ σου ὀναίμην ἐν κυρίῳ· ἀνάπαυσόν μου τὰ σπλάγχνα ἐν Χριστῷ

• ὀναίμην (onaimēn, optative of ὀνίνημι, “to profit/benefit”) — the second half of the wordplay on Ὀνήσιμος begun in v.11: “may I have benefit/Onesimus from you.” [NEW] लाभं प्राप्नुयाम् (lābhaṃ prāpnuyām, “may I obtain benefit”). Low doctrinal risk, but High translation-difficulty flag: the pun is untranslatable in Sanskrit and must be explained in a translator note rather than reproduced, matching the flag already raised at v.11.
• ἀναπαύω (anapauō) — “refresh, give rest to,” echoing σπλάγχνα from v.12. [NEW] विश्रामं देहि (viśrāmaṃ dehi, “give rest”). Low.
• ἐν Χριστῷ / ἐν κυρίῳ — reuse the baseline’s “christian_identity_in_christ” doctrinal frame. [REUSED]. High, per baseline.

Verse 21

Greek: Πεποιθὼς τῇ ὑπακοῇ σου ἔγραψά σοι, εἰδὼς ὅτι καὶ ὑπὲρ ὃ λέγω ποιήσεις

• πεποιθώς (pepoithōs, perfect participle of πείθω, “persuade/trust”) — “having confidence.” [NEW] विश्वस्तः / निश्चयेन (niścayena, “with confidence”). Medium — take care not to conflate with [REUSED] विश्वासः (faith, per baseline); this is ordinary interpersonal confidence in Philemon’s character, not saving faith in Christ, and should be lexically distinguished from विश्वासः to avoid doctrinal blurring.
• ὑπακοή (hypakoē) — lit. “obedience,” same root the baseline uses for the doctrine “obedience_of_faith” (विश्वासस्य आज्ञापालनम्). Theological meaning here: Paul expects Philemon’s free, love-motivated compliance with the appeal — a small-scale enactment of the same faith-flowing-obedience principle Romans states doctrinally. [NEW] आज्ञापालनम् (ājñāpālanam). Medium-High — should be explicitly cross-referenced to the baseline’s “obedience_of_faith” doctrine entry and to v.14’s ἑκούσιον/ἀνάγκη contrast: this is obedience arising from transformed love and confidence, not compelled duty (again touching, by contrast, the Mīmāṃsā vidhi/niyoga concern already flagged for “law”).

---

Chapter 1 — Remaining Sections (vv.1–7 and vv.22–25)

Since Philemon is a single-chapter letter, full-book coverage requires treating its opening and closing sections with the same rigor as any additional “chapter” in a longer book.

Philemon 1:1–7 (Opening and Thanksgiving)

• Παῦλος (Paulos) — [REUSED] पौलः (Paulaḥ), per baseline transliteration standards. Low.
• δέσμιος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ (“prisoner of Christ Jesus,” v.1) — combines [NEW] बन्दी (see v.9 above) with [REUSED] ख्रीष्टः/यीशुः. Medium — note that Paul identifies his imprisonment status as belonging to Christ, not as shameful; the genitive should be rendered to preserve this (ख्रीष्टयीशोः बन्दी, “Christ Jesus’s prisoner,” not merely “a prisoner who happens to be Christian”).
• συνεργός (synergos, “fellow-worker,” of Philemon himself and, at v.24, of Mark/Aristarchus/Demas/Luke) — [NEW] सहकारी (sahakārī). Low.
• ἀγαπητός (v.1, “beloved,” of Philemon) — see v.16 treatment above. Medium.
• ἀδελφή (adelphē, “sister,” of Apphia, v.2) — [NEW] भगिनी (bhaginī). Low — direct feminine counterpart to ἀδελφός; no additional doctrinal weight beyond the brotherhood doctrine already carried by the masculine form.
• συστρατιώτης (systratiōtēs, “fellow soldier,” of Archippus, v.2) — [NEW] सहसैनिकः (sahasainikaḥ), a military metaphor for shared gospel labor. Low-Medium — ensure it is not read as endorsing literal militarism; this is a standard Pauline metaphor (cf. 2 Timothy 2:3) for costly shared struggle.
• ἐκκλησία (v.2, “the church in your house”) — [REUSED] मण्डली (maṇḍalī), per baseline. Medium, per baseline’s existing “church_as_gods_people” doctrine; note the house-church setting, distinct from a temple-building.
• χάρις / εἰρήνη (v.3, grace/peace salutation) — [REUSED] अनुग्रहः / शान्तिः, per baseline. High/Medium respectively, per baseline.
• εὐχαριστέω (v.4, “I give thanks”) — [REUSED] धन्यवादः, per baseline “thanksgiving” entry. Low.
• μνεία (mneia, “remembrance/mention,” v.4) — [NEW] स्मरणम् (smaraṇam). Low.
• προσευχή (proseuchē, “prayer,” v.4, also v.22) — [NEW] प्रार्थना (prārthanā). Medium, per baseline’s “prayer_and_intercession” doctrine entry — distinguish from Vedic ritual invocation (āhvāna/homa) requiring precise mantra-performance for efficacy; Christian prayer here is relational petition, not ritually mechanical.
• πίστις (v.5–6, “your faith”) — [REUSED] विश्वासः, per baseline. High, per baseline’s “faith” doctrine.
• ἀγάπη (v.5, “and love,” paired with faith) — see v.9 treatment above. High.
• κοινωνία (v.6, “the fellowship of your faith”) — [REUSED] सहभागिता, per baseline. Low, per baseline.
• ἐνεργής (energēs, “effective/active,” v.6 — “that the fellowship of your faith may become effective”) — [NEW] सक्रिया (sakriyā, “active/effective”). Low.
• ἐπίγνωσις (epignōsis, “full knowledge,” v.6) — [NEW] पूर्णज्ञानम् (pūrṇajñānam). Medium — caution: avoid रendering with a bare ज्ञान-family term without qualification, since ज्ञान alone risks activating jñāna-mārga (the knowledge-path to mokṣa) associations; पूर्णज्ञानम् here denotes simple, full comprehension of the good one has in Christ, not a liberating gnosis.
• χαρά (chara, “joy,” v.7) — [NEW] आनन्दः (ānandaḥ). Medium — आनन्द is a significant Vedāntic term (one of the descriptors of Brahman in satcitānanda, “being-consciousness-bliss”); a lighter alternative, हर्षः (harṣaḥ, joy/gladness), is proposed as preferred to avoid inadvertently invoking Brahman-nature language for simple relational joy. Alternatives rejected: आनन्दः (too theologically loaded); recommended: हर्षः.
• ἄνεσις (anesis, “refreshment, rest,” v.7) — same semantic family as ἀναπαύω (v.20). [NEW] विश्रान्तिः (viśrāntiḥ). Low.

Chapter coverage note: vv.1–7 introduce no terms already flagged Critical in the baseline beyond the reused God/Christ/Church/Faith/Grace/Peace vocabulary; the new terms above are Low-to-Medium risk except ἀγάπη (High, treated fully at v.9).

Philemon 1:22–25 (Closing)

• ξενία (xenia, “lodging/hospitality,” v.22) — [NEW] अतिथ्यम् (ātithyam). Low — a positive, well-attested Sanskrit social-religious concept (atithi-satkāra, hospitality to the guest) that aligns naturally with the biblical concept and needs no doctrinal caution.
• ἐλπίζω (elpizō, “I hope,” v.22) — [NEW] आशा करोमि (āśāṃ karomi). Low.
• χαρίζομαι (charizomai, “to grant graciously,” v.22 — “I hope to be granted to you,” χαρισθήσομαι) — cognate with [REUSED] χάρις/अनुग्रहः. [NEW] अनुग्रहेण दास्यते (anugraheṇa dāsyate, “will be graciously given”). Medium-High — this is a notable doctrinal echo: Paul frames his own restored presence with the church as itself a charis-gift, reinforcing (in miniature) the baseline’s Grace doctrine; flag for a translator note connecting this verb to the noun χάρις/अनुग्रहः already Critical/High-flagged in the baseline.
• συναιχμάλωτος (synaichmalōtos, “fellow-prisoner-of-war,” of Epaphras, v.23) — [NEW] सहबन्दी (sahabandī). Low-Medium — a vivid military-captivity metaphor for shared suffering in gospel ministry; should not be softened to a generic “companion.”
• ἀσπάζομαι (aspazomai, “greet,” v.23) — [NEW] नमस्करोति (namaskaroti) or अभिवादयति (abhivādayati). Low — standard epistolary greeting; note that नमस्कार-family verbs carry no ritual-worship risk when used for ordinary human greeting (context clearly non-devotional), but abhivādayati is the more neutral choice to avoid any devotional overtone.
• τὸ πνεῦμα ὑμῶν (“your spirit,” v.25, the closing benediction — a human spirit, not the Holy Spirit) — High-risk flag, [NEW]: do not render with आत्मा here, despite आत्मा being grammatically available for “spirit.” The baseline’s Holy Spirit entry explicitly warns that आत्मा must never be used for generic “spirit” language elsewhere in a way that could reinforce an ātman-Brahman identity reading (per Chāndogya 6.8.7, Bṛhadāraṇyaka 1.4.10). Since this verse addresses the reader’s own personal “spirit,” using आत्मा here would risk the strongest possible activation of exactly that Advaitic mahāvākya association (“thou art that,” “I am Brahman”) at the letter’s final and most memorable line. Recommended rendering: चित्तेन (cittena, “with your mind/heart”) or प्राणेन (prāṇena, “with your life/breath”), explicitly avoiding आत्मा. This is flagged Critical for review, notwithstanding its brevity, precisely because it is a placement risk (final verse, benediction) compounding a lexical risk already flagged at the highest tier in the baseline.
• χάρις (v.25, closing grace benediction) — [REUSED] अनुग्रहः. High, per baseline; note the consistency rule that Romans 1:16–17-style thesis verses require identical rendering — the same discipline should apply to this letter’s opening (v.3) and closing (v.25) grace benedictions, which should be worded identically to each other within this document.

Chapter coverage note: vv.22–25 introduce no Critical-tier lexical items beyond the “your spirit” flag above (which is Critical by placement/context rather than by the underlying Greek word itself) and the reused grace/Christ vocabulary.

---

Summary Table: Reused vs. New Terms

Status	Terms
Reused exactly from baseline	εὐαγγέλιον (सुसमाचारः), χάρις (अनुग्रहः), εἰρήνη (शान्तिः), πίστις (विश्वासः), κοινωνία (सहभागिता), ἐκκλησία (मण्डली), κύριος (प्रभुः), Ἰησοῦς/Χριστός (यीशुः/ख्रीष्टः), ἅγιοι — implied for the church at v.5 context (पवित्राः जनाः), ἐν Χριστῷ doctrinal frame, Παῦλος (पौलः), “obedience of faith” root vocabulary
New terms proposed for extension of translation memory	ἀγάπη (प्रेम, High), δοῦλος (दासः, Critical), ἀδελφός (भ्राता, High), σπλάγχνα (हृदयम्, Medium), ὀφείλω/ἐλλογάω (ऋणम्/मयि आरोपयतु, High), ἑκούσιον/ἀνάγκη (स्वेच्छया/आवश्यकता, High), τέκνον/γεννάω (पुत्रः/जनितवान्, Medium), δέσμιος (बन्दी, Low-Medium), κοινωνός (सहभागी, Medium), the “your spirit” flag at 1:25 (चित्तेन, Critical by context), and a set of Low-risk descriptive terms (παρρησία, ἐπιτάσσω, ξενία, ἀσπάζομαι, etc.) detailed above.

Every chapter of Philemon (i.e., the whole of its single chapter) has been reviewed; no verse is without at least one load-bearing term analyzed above.