Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis
This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.
Risk tier summary
| Tier | Count | Review routing | Example doctrines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 5 | Human theologian, every occurrence | Grace, Salvation, Sanctification, Church as God’s People |
| High | 14 | Human theologian | Gospel, Lordship of Christ, Faith, Adoption, Sainthood, Peace with God, Universal Scope of the Gospel, Unity of Jews and Gentiles, Mission to the Nations, Kingdom Mission |
| Medium | 18 | Native speaker review | Incarnation, Deity of Christ, Sonship of Christ, Resurrection of Christ, Prayer and Intercession, Evangelism |
| Low | 3 | Automated review only | Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship |
Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do
The five Critical-risk doctrines share one property distinct from both a syncretism-risk profile and a purely theological East-West divergence: each collides with either a three-way theological divergence among Ukraine’s coexisting Christian traditions, or a live, current political controversy over church jurisdiction since 2022. Grace, salvation, and sanctification are doctrines where Ukrainian’s existing, perfectly fluent vocabulary was shaped differently by each of three traditions; church as God’s people is Critical specifically because “church” itself has become an actively contested political word in the current wartime landscape, not merely a default-institutional-reading risk.
Review routing rationale
Critical and High risk doctrines (19 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Ukrainian is fluent and theologically coherent within one tradition without catching that it doesn’t match Romans’ own forensic argument, or without catching an unintended political signal around church jurisdiction. Native speaker review is sufficient for the 18 Medium-risk doctrines, which include the shared Christological core (incarnation, deity and sonship of Christ, resurrection) — lower risk because all three Ukrainian Christian traditions already confess the same Nicene doctrine, and the concern is clarity of exposition rather than doctrinal contradiction.