Linguistic Gap Analysis
Linguistic Gap Analysis — Hebrews (English → Assamese)
Purpose and Scope
This analysis identifies where Assamese lacks a clean lexical equivalent for a Hebrews doctrine-bearing term (“missing vocabulary”), where an available Assamese term is already loaded with competing meaning from Assamese Hindu, Vaishnavite (Ekasarana Dharma), Shakta/tantric, or Vedantic religious registers (“crowded semantic neighborhoods”), and where a transliteration-vs-paraphrase decision must be made. It builds directly on the Romans baseline (translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, doctrine_risk_registry.json) and on this curriculum’s 08_core_glossary.md and Hebrews-specific bible_term_registry.json entries, reusing every baseline rendering exactly and never contradicting it. Coverage spans the entire book of Hebrews, chapters 1–13, with the core passage (Hebrews 9:11–28) treated as the theological anchor rather than the scope boundary.
Part 1: Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix
For each of the eight Hebrews curriculum doctrines: available Assamese terms, their weaknesses, and the recommended strategy.
1. The Superiority of Christ over Angels, Moses, and the Levitical Priesthood
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Available terms | দূত (angel, [baseline-extended]); মোচি (Moses, [baseline]); যাজক/মহাযাজক ([new]); উত্তম (better/superior, [new]) |
| Weaknesses | Assamese/Hindu cosmology has a crowded category of celestial and semi-divine beings (দেব, গন্ধৰ্ব, স্বৰ্গৰ দূত-adjacent figures) that can blur the sharp created/uncreated line Hebrews 1–2 draws. উত্তম itself is safe but must be used with total consistency or the book’s comparative argument (Christ vs. angels vs. Moses vs. Levitical priests) loses its rhetorical spine. |
| Recommended strategy | Retain দূত for angel with a mandatory translator note at first occurrence (Heb 1:4–14) stating angels are created, serving spirit-beings, categorically distinct from the eternal, uncreated Son who is worshipped by them (1:6). Fix উত্তম as the single, invariant rendering for κρείττων/κρείσσων throughout all 13 chapters — this is the pedagogical spine of the whole book and must never vary to শ্রেষ্ঠ or অধিক ভাল mid-document. |
2. Christ as the Great High Priest
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Available terms | মহাযাজক ([new], Critical); যাজক/যাজকত্ব ([new], High); পুৰোহিত (rejected) |
| Weaknesses | The natural, most frequent Assamese word for “priest” in ordinary religious speech is পুৰোহিত — the Brahmin ritual specialist who performs puja/yajna for a caste-restricted clientele. Using it for Christ would collapse his priesthood into a caste-based ritual-specialist role and invite a substitution logic (any properly trained priest can perform the office; the office outlives any one priest). |
| Recommended strategy | মহাযাজক/যাজক (already fixed in the Hebrews term registry) built on established Bengali-Assamese Protestant usage, never পুৰোহিত. Mandatory translator note at every first occurrence per document: Christ’s high priesthood is unique, permanent, heavenly, without successor, fulfilling and superseding the Levitical order — not a caste-based ritual office that any qualified candidate may hold. |
3. The New Covenant versus the Old
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Available terms | নিয়ম (covenant, [baseline]); নতুন নিয়ম (new covenant, [baseline-extended]) |
| Weaknesses | নতুন নিয়ম / পুৰণি নিয়ম are also the standing Assamese Bible Society book-titles for “New Testament” / “Old Testament.” A reader can default to “the book” rather than “the covenant relationship.” Additionally, διαθήκη in 9:16–17 shifts sense to “last will/testament,” a legal meaning নিয়ম does not naturally carry — Assamese has no single word doing double duty the way the Greek does. |
| Recommended strategy | Reuse নতুন নিয়ম exactly, with a mandatory disambiguating note at first theological occurrence in each chapter distinguishing “the covenant relationship God establishes” from “the New Testament [the book].” For 9:16–17 specifically, use an explanatory parenthetical (নিয়ম (এটা উইলৰ দৰেও)) at that occurrence only, with a translator note explaining the Greek wordplay so the logical chain from covenant→death→inheritance is not lost. |
4. The Once-for-All Atoning Sacrifice
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Available terms | বলি (sacrifice, [new], Critical); প্ৰায়শ্চিত্ত (atonement, [new], Critical); চিৰকালৰ বাবে এবাৰ (once for all, [new], High); তেজ (blood, [new], High) |
| Weaknesses | This is the single most crowded semantic neighborhood in the entire curriculum. বলি is the living, contemporary word for votive animal sacrifice at Kamakhya and other Shakta sites — offered by a worshipper, often repeatedly, to a deity for favor or vow-fulfillment. প্ৰায়শ্চিত্ত is standard Hindu ritual penance/expiation performed BY the guilty party. Both run in the opposite direction from Hebrews’ argument: Christ, sinless, offers himself ON BEHALF OF the guilty, ONCE, ending the entire sacrificial system rather than being one more instance of it. |
| Recommended strategy | No viable substitute exists for বলি or প্ৰায়শ্চিত্ত — Assamese has no other word carrying the necessary sacrificial-cultic register. Manage entirely through mandatory, repeated translator notes at every occurrence across chapters 9, 10, and 13 (including the metaphorical প্ৰশংসাৰ বলি in 13:15, which must be explicitly marked as non-literal). চিৰকালৰ বাবে এবাৰ must be held invariant everywhere ἐφάπαξ/ἅπαξ occurs (6:4 area, 7:27, 9:12, 9:26–28, 10:10) to keep the finality argument visually consistent across the book. |
5. The Danger of Apostasy and Warning Passages
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Available terms | বিশ্বাস ত্যাগ কৰি পিছুৱাই যোৱা ([new], Critical); অবিশ্বাস ([new], High) |
| Weaknesses | No single Assamese word exists for “apostasy” as a technical category; the compound phrase must do the work of “a decisive falling away from previously professed faith,” which risks being read either too weakly (ordinary backsliding/doubt) or, in an Ekasarana-influenced setting, too strongly as leaving one’s birth religious community/social identity (a serious social-honor category in Assamese village life) rather than a theological falling away from professed trust in Christ. |
| Recommended strategy | Retain the compound phrase exactly as fixed in the term registry; every occurrence (6:4–6, 10:26–31, 10:35–39, 12:15–17, 12:25) must be routed to human theologian review per the escalation rules, both for theological precision on the perseverance/apostasy tension and to ensure the social-honor “leaving the community” reading does not silently substitute for the theological “renouncing trust in Christ” reading. |
6. Faith of the Old Testament Saints
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Available terms | বিশ্বাস ([baseline], Critical); নিশ্চয়তা (assurance/substance, [new], Medium); dozens of OT proper names ([new-proper-names]) |
| Weaknesses | বিশ্বাস is well-established from the Romans baseline, but Hebrews 11’s extended roll-call format (Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Rahab, etc.) assumes an OT narrative literacy this curriculum’s audience largely lacks, per the baseline’s own tone requirements. নিশ্চয়তা (ὑπόστασις, 11:1) risks importing the later technical Trinitarian “hypostasis” sense if a translator over-theologizes an ordinary-register verse. |
| Recommended strategy | Reuse বিশ্বাস exactly; supply brief narrative footnotes for every named OT figure at first occurrence (already flagged in the core glossary) given low assumed OT literacy. For 11:1, render ὑπόστασις in its plain, non-technical sense (নিশ্চয়তা/দৃঢ় ভিত্তি) with an explicit note that this is NOT the later Trinitarian “Person” usage. |
7. Perseverance and Assurance
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Available terms | স্থৈৰ্য্য/সহনশীলতা (endurance, [new], High); দৃঢ়তা-family terms for assurance |
| Weaknesses | The most available Assamese vocabulary for enduring hardship over a long span (সহনশীলতা, ধৃতি) carries an available stoic-fatalistic overtone consonant with accepting one’s karmic lot without complaint — the opposite of Hebrews’ point, which grounds endurance in a specific, personal, promise-keeping God. |
| Recommended strategy | Use স্থৈৰ্য্য anchored explicitly, at every occurrence in chapters 10 and 12, to the preceding clause naming God’s promise or Christ’s example (10:23, 10:36, 12:1–2) so the endurance reads as hope-grounded rather than resignation-grounded. |
8. Access to God through Christ’s Blood
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Available terms | সাহস (boldness, [new], High); ওচৰ চাপি যাওক (draw near, [new], High); অনুগ্ৰহৰ সিংহাসন (throne of grace, [new], High) |
| Weaknesses | Assamese devotional and social registers both contain deeply embedded patterns of mediated, purity-graded, or status-graded access to the sacred — historic caste-restricted temple-entry customs, and (in a different register) the entry customs of the Namghar. সাহস alone (ordinary “courage”) does not by itself convey the specifically theological “unrestricted access for every believer regardless of status” claim unless anchored to its object. |
| Recommended strategy | Always pair সাহস and ওচৰ চাপি যাওক with an explicit object (ঈশ্বৰৰ ওচৰত / অনুগ্ৰহৰ সিংহাসনৰ ওচৰত) and, at first occurrence in chapters 4 and 10, a translator note stating this access is unconditioned by caste, purity-status, or priestly gatekeeping — a genuinely new, socially significant claim for the target audience. |
Part 2: Missing Vocabulary vs. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods
2A. Missing Vocabulary (no natural single Assamese word — compound phrase or coinage required)
| Concept | Gap | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| justification-style forensic terms carried over (n/a to Hebrews directly, but structurally similar gap recurs) | — | See baseline; not newly introduced here |
| ”exact imprint” (χαρακτὴρ τῆς ὑποστάσεως, 1:3) | No single Assamese noun conveys “the precise stamp that shares the very substance of its source” as opposed to “a representative image of” | Use compound যথাযথ স্বৰূপ; mandatory note it is NOT প্ৰতিমূৰ্তি (crafted idol-image) |
| “eternal redemption” (9:12) | উদ্ধাৰ alone conveys rescue but not the decisive, price-paid, once-secured legal sense of ἀπολύτρωσις | Compound অনন্ত উদ্ধাৰ; never a মুক্তি-root word |
| ”once for all” (ἐφάπαξ/ἅπαξ) | No single-word Assamese equivalent for this technical finality-marker | Fixed phrase চিৰকালৰ বাবে এবাৰ, held invariant |
| ”covenant-as-testament” wordplay (9:16–17) | নিয়ম cannot carry the dual covenant/last-will sense the Greek exploits | Parenthetical gloss + mandatory translator note, single occurrence only |
| ”end of the ages” (9:26) | No neutral Assamese temporal phrase free of cyclical connotation | যুগৰ শেষত with mandatory linear-history note; consider সময়ৰ পৰিসমাপ্তিত as supplement |
| ”dead works” (6:1, 9:14) | কৰ্ম is the very word for karma; there is no neutral Assamese word for “meritless ritual/legal action” that avoids the karma-accounting field entirely | Compound মৃত কৰ্ম with mandatory note distinguishing from multi-life merit/demerit accounting |
| ”sacrifice of praise” (13:15) | No word exists for a purely verbal/devotional “offering” that is not বলি | Compound প্ৰশংসাৰ বলি with an explicit non-literal marker at first use |
| ”bear the sins of many” (9:28) | No existing Assamese theological phrase for one-person vicarious sin-bearing; individual, non-transferable κৰ্ম-debt is the dominant local framework | Descriptive compound বহুতৰ পাপ বহন কৰা; treat as a positive teaching opportunity, flagged for commentary explanation rather than softened |
| ”indestructible life” (7:16) | No word untouched by ritual-merit association | অক্ষয় জীৱন with a brief note that this is intrinsic to Christ’s own resurrection-victory, not accumulated merit (cf. Akshaya Tritiya association) |
2B. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods (available term already carries competing religious weight — requires fencing)
| Assamese term | Competing tradition-meaning | Biblical concept assigned | Fencing strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| বলি | Shakta votive animal sacrifice (Kamakhya and related sites); worshipper-offered, often repeated, boon-seeking | sacrifice (θυσία) | Mandatory, repeated translator notes at every occurrence (chs. 9, 10, 13); emphasize priest-as-victim, once, on behalf of the guilty, ending the system |
| প্ৰায়শ্চিত্ত | Self-performed Hindu penance/expiation to neutralize karmic consequence | atonement/propitiation (ἱλασμός) | Mandatory note: Christ (sinless) atones FOR the guilty; the guilty do not atone for themselves |
| পুৰোহিত | Caste-restricted Brahmin ritual specialist, substitutable office | priest / high priest | Forbidden; use যাজক/মহাযাজক exclusively, with uniqueness/non-successive note |
| অৱতাৰ | Krishna’s periodic avatar-descent to restore dharma at a yuga transition | incarnation-adjacent “appearing” language (9:24–28), and by extension any first-coming/second-coming language | Forbidden (already forbidden for দেহধাৰণ in Romans baseline); extend the prohibition explicitly to appear_manifest/second_appearing entries; use দেখা দিয়া, never a প্ৰকাশ-root |
| যুগ | Cyclical cosmic age (yuga) with avatar-at-transition pattern | ”end of the ages” (9:26) | Mandatory linear-history note every occurrence; consider supplementary phrasing |
| সিদ্ধ | Tantric/yogic adept who has attained supernatural power/liberation through spiritual technique (Kamakhya-region tantric-Shakta association) | perfect/mature (τελειόω/τέλειος) | Forbidden; use সম্পূর্ণ কৰা with mandatory note (5:9, 7:28, 6:1, 12:2) |
| আত্মা | Vedantic ātman, ultimately identical with the universal Self/Brahman in Advaita thought | soul (ψυχή) | Unavoidable (also the required word for “spirit” elsewhere); mandatory note at first occurrence (6:19) distinguishing the biblical soul (a creature, distinct from and dependent on God) from ātman-Brahman identity |
| শাস্তি | Punishment/retribution, easily read through a karmic cause-effect lens | fatherly discipline (παιδεία, 12:5–11) | Forbidden for this sense; use শাসন with mandatory note anchoring it to prior sonship/adoption, not retribution |
| প্ৰতিমূৰ্তি | Crafted cultic idol-image (e.g., a Durga Puja pratima) representing a deity | exact imprint (χαρακτὴρ, 1:3) | Forbidden; use যথাযথ স্বৰূপ — the Son shares God’s being, does not merely depict it |
| সিঞ্চন | Standard Hindu ritual aspersion (abhishek, holy-water sprinkling) | sprinkle (ῥαντίζω, 9:13, 10:22, 12:24) | No better alternative exists; anchor with a note tying each occurrence to the specific OT red-heifer ordinance, not generic devotional ritual |
| প্ৰণাম (alone) | Generic respectful bowing given to deities, elders, gurus, and a Satradhikar alike | worship of the Son by angels (προσκυνέω, 1:6) | Insufficient alone; pair with a note that this specific instance affirms full deity, not general honorific veneration |
| নামঘৰ / মন্দিৰ | Ekasarana Dharma prayer-house institution / image-centered Hindu temple | tabernacle (σκηνή) and, separately, church (already forbidden in baseline) | Both forbidden for তম্বু; the tabernacle’s portable, provisional, non-architectural character must be preserved |
| গুৰু / Satradhikar | Institutional guru-successor mediating between an ordinary devotee and the divine within Ekasarana structure | mediator (μεσίτης, 8:6, 9:15, 12:24) and, separately, apostle (already fenced in baseline) | Use মধ্যস্থ, built on baseline’s মধ্যস্থতা root; note that Christ’s mediatorship is unique, sufficient, and not institutionally transmitted or successive |
| যুগ-avatar-adjacent risk in “second appearing” | Reincarnation of the same divine figure into a fresh body | second coming (ἐκ δευτέρου ὀφθήσεται, 9:28) | Mandatory note: singular, bodily, self-same return, not reincarnation or a fresh avatar-descent |
| কৰ্মফল / ভাগ্য | Impersonal karmic reckoning / fate | judgment (κρίσις, 9:27, 10:27) | Forbidden; use বিচাৰ, anchored to a personal God’s forensic verdict, not automatic cause-effect across lifetimes |
| মুক্তি / মোক্ষ | Release from the samsara rebirth cycle | rest (κατάπαυσις/σαββατισμός, chs. 3–4), redemption (9:12), homeland/city (11:14–16) | All three forbidden from importing this root; use বিশ্ৰাম, উদ্ধাৰ, and স্বদেশ respectively, each anchored to relational/covenantal/embodied-future categories, never escape-from-embodiment categories |
Part 3: Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions
| Item | Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Melchizedek (Μελχισέδεκ) | Transliterate: মল্কিচেদক | Proper name with no Assamese equivalent; historically obscure even to a Christian OT-literate reader — requires an explanatory footnote (Gen 14 priest-king) at every occurrence (chs. 5, 6, 7), not a descriptive paraphrase, since the argument depends on the specific named “order of Melchizedek.” |
| Zion / Sinai (Σιών / Σινά) | Transliterate: সিয়োন পাহাৰ / সিনয় পাহাৰ | Established proper-name convention; paraphrase (e.g., “the holy mountain” / “the mountain of law”) would erase the deliberate Hebrews 12:18–24 contrast between the two named mountains, which is the rhetorical point of the passage. |
| High priest (ἀρχιερεύς) | Paraphrase via compound (মহাযাজক), not transliteration | A transliterated Greek loanword would communicate nothing to the target audience; the compound anchors to the already-established Bengali-Assamese Protestant যাজক root, preserving intelligibility while avoiding পুৰোহিত. |
| Abba (Romans 8:15, referenced doctrinally in Hebrews 12:9’s Father-discipline argument) | Retain transliteration আব্বা per baseline, supplemented with পিতা | Consistency with Romans baseline; Hebrews 12 does not itself use Abba but the underlying filial-intimacy doctrine connects — no new decision needed, reuse baseline exactly. |
| Amen / Hallelujah (13:21 doxology; not present verbatim but doxological form recurs) | Transliterate: আমেন / হাল্লিলূয়া | Per the 12_ai_translation_requirements.md standard; reuse exactly, no new decision required. |
| ”Once for all” (ἐφάπαξ/ἅπαξ) | Paraphrase as fixed idiomatic compound চিৰকালৰ বাবে এবাৰ, not a single coined transliteration | English/Greek has no exact one-word Assamese match; a stable multi-word phrase used with total consistency communicates the finality concept better than any coinage would. |
| Melchizedekian priesthood language (“after the order of,” κατὰ τὴν τάξιν) | Paraphrase: ”…ৰ ক্ৰম অনুসৰি” / ”…ৰ ধৰণৰ” with Melchizedek transliterated | The “order/rank” concept paraphrases cleanly; only the proper name itself needs transliteration. |
| Sabbath-rest (σαββατισμός, 4:9) | Paraphrase: শবাথ-বিশ্ৰাম (compound, partial transliteration of “Sabbath” + translated “rest”) | Sabbath as an OT institution is unfamiliar to the target audience; partial transliteration preserves the OT-specific referent while বিশ্ৰাম keeps the theological content (covenantal rest, not moksha) legible. Footnote on the OT Sabbath institution recommended at first occurrence. |
| Exact imprint (χαρακτήρ) | Paraphrase only (যথাযথ স্বৰূপ); transliteration rejected outright | A Greek loanword transliteration would carry zero meaning; must paraphrase, and must avoid প্ৰতিমূৰ্তি specifically (see Part 2B). |
| Names of OT saints in Hebrews 11 (Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Rahab, etc.) | Transliterate using established ABS forms (হাবিল, হনোক, নোহ, অব্ৰাহাম, চাৰা, ইজাক, যাকোব, যোচেফ, ৰাহাব) | Reuse exactly per the core glossary; supplement each with a brief narrative footnote given assumed low OT literacy, rather than attempting a paraphrase-in-place that would disrupt the roll-call’s rhetorical cadence. |
Part 4: Ranked List of This Book’s Highest-Risk Ambiguities
Ranked by combined severity (doctrinal centrality × collision risk with an existing, well-entrenched Assamese religious concept):
-
Sacrifice (বলি) — Hebrews 9–10, 13. Unavoidable lexical collision with living Kamakhya-adjacent Shakta votive sacrifice. No substitute word exists. Single highest risk term in the book; requires mandatory, repeated translator notes at every occurrence, not just first use.
-
Christ’s “appearing” language (9:24–28), including “second appearing.” The passage’s own once/again structure superficially mirrors the cyclical avatar-descent pattern central to Ekasarana Dharma theology (Krishna’s periodic descents). Requires দেখা দিয়া (never a প্ৰকাশ-root) with mandatory notes at every one of the three appearings named in this single paragraph.
-
Atonement / propitiation (প্ৰায়শ্চিত্ত) — Hebrews 2:17, 9. Structurally inverted from Hindu ritual penance (self-performed by the guilty); Christ atones on behalf of, not through the effort of, the guilty. Compounds directly with risk #1.
-
High priest / priest (মহাযাজক / যাজক) vs. পুৰোহিত — throughout chs. 2–10. Constant, high-frequency term across the whole doctrinal spine of the book (Christ as Great High Priest); a single lapse into পুৰোহিত anywhere in the curriculum would undermine the uniqueness argument.
-
Perfect/mature (সম্পূর্ণ কৰা) vs. সিদ্ধ — chs. 5, 6, 7, 12. Tantric-Shakta “siddha” adept-attainment collision is specific to this region’s religious vocabulary (compounded by Kamakhya’s tantric associations) and easily missed by a translator defaulting to the more literarily elegant সিদ্ধ.
-
End of the ages (যুগৰ শেষত) — Hebrews 9:26. Direct collision with Hindu cyclical yuga-cosmology and the avatar-at-yuga-transition pattern; this single verse is where the book’s linear-history argument is most vulnerable to a cyclical misreading.
-
Dead works (মৃত কৰ্ম) — Hebrews 6:1, 9:14. কৰ্ম is literally “karma” in ordinary Assamese religious usage; risk of importing the entire multi-life merit/demerit accounting framework into a phrase meant to describe spiritually lifeless (not karmically negative) works.
-
Soul (আত্মা) — Hebrews 6:19, 10:39, 13. Unavoidable word, but carries latent ātman-Brahman identity risk from Advaita Vedanta’s strong influence on Assamese religious vocabulary; risk is diffuse (recurs quietly across many verses) rather than acute in any single verse.
-
New covenant (নতুন নিয়ম) vs. “New Testament” [the book] — chs. 8, 9, 12. Not a syncretism risk but a reference-confusion risk: readers may default to “the book” rather than “the covenant relationship,” weakening the chs. 8–9 argument’s force.
-
Exact imprint (যথাযথ স্বৰূপ) vs. প্ৰতিমূৰ্তি — Hebrews 1:3. Single-verse but Critical-tier risk: an idol-image reading would suggest the Son merely represents God rather than shares his very being — a direct contradiction of the deity-of-Christ doctrine this verse anchors.
-
Fatherly discipline (শাসন) vs. শাস্তি — Hebrews 12:5–11. Common-word risk: শাস্তি is the far more natural/frequent Assamese word for “discipline” in casual usage, creating strong pressure toward the punitive-retribution reading the passage explicitly rejects.
-
Apostasy language (Critical, escalation-mandatory) — Hebrews 6:4–6, 10:26–31, 12:15–17. Not primarily a syncretism risk but an internal-doctrinal-coherence risk (relationship to perseverance/assurance doctrine); flagged here because it recurs across three separate warning passages and each occurrence independently requires human theologian adjudication.
-
Covenant-as-testament wordplay (নিয়ম) — Hebrews 9:16–17. Narrow, single-passage risk of lost argumentative logic (not syncretism) if the covenant/last-will double sense is not explicitly glossed.
-
Worship of the Son by angels (প্ৰণাম কৰা alone) — Hebrews 1:6. Risk of the reader supplying the ordinary honorific-bowing sense (given to deities, elders, gurus, and Satradhikars alike) rather than recognizing this as a deity-affirming exclusive-worship claim.
Part 5: Full-Book Chapter Coverage Note
Per the full-book coverage mandate, every chapter of Hebrews has been reviewed for load-bearing vocabulary and doctrinal risk, whether or not it contributed new registry entries beyond those already captured in 08_core_glossary.md and the Hebrews bible_term_registry.json:
| Chapter | Coverage status |
|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed — high new-term density (Son, exact imprint, radiance of glory, worship, angel); addressed in Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 above. |
| 2 | Reviewed — high priest/priesthood introduced; founder/pioneer, dead works (implicit); no additional new-term risk beyond core glossary entries. |
| 3 | Reviewed — apostle (elevated sense), unbelief, rest, calling; addressed above. |
| 4 | Reviewed — rest, boldness, throne of grace, draw near; addressed above. |
| 5 | Reviewed — Melchizedek, perfect/mature, priesthood; addressed above. |
| 6 | Reviewed — apostasy, repentance, enlightened, dead works, resurrection (elementary teachings), once-for-all groundwork; addressed above. |
| 7 | Reviewed — Melchizedek’s order, indestructible life, better/superior, mediator groundwork, perfect/mature; addressed above. |
| 8 | Reviewed — new covenant, covenant, mediator, copy/shadow groundwork, tabernacle groundwork; addressed above. No further new terms beyond core glossary. |
| 9 | Core passage (9:11–28). Reviewed exhaustively — high priest, tabernacle, holy places, Most Holy Place, veil, ark of the covenant, mercy seat, atonement, blood, sacrifice, once for all, redemption, sprinkle, mediator, covenant-as-testament, purification of flesh, conscience, copy/shadow, true things, appear/manifest, end of the ages, bear sins of many, second appearing, die once, judgment; every item addressed in Parts 1–4 above. |
| 10 | Reviewed — sacrifice, blood, once for all, sprinkle, boldness, draw near, endurance, apostasy (10:26–31), righteousness (Hab 2:4 quotation continuity with Romans 1:17), soul; addressed above. |
| 11 | Reviewed — faith, assurance/substance, resurrection (“better resurrection”), extensive OT proper names (Abel through Rahab and beyond), homeland/city groundwork; addressed above. |
| 12 | Reviewed — discipline (fatherly), endurance, founder/pioneer (“founder and perfecter of faith”), kingdom of God (unshakeable kingdom), Zion/Sinai, apostasy (12:15–17), homeland/city, mediator (blood of the covenant echo); addressed above. |
| 13 | Reviewed — sacrifice of praise, outside the camp, blood of the covenant (echo), living God, serve (cultic); addressed above. No additional new-term risk beyond what is captured in Parts 1–4. |
No chapter was found to be theologically inert; chapters 8 and 13, while contributing comparatively fewer new lexical items than chapter 9, still carry load-bearing continuations of covenant and sacrifice vocabulary already fenced above and are explicitly noted as reviewed rather than silently omitted.
This analysis extends but does not alter any baseline Romans Language Package rendering. All Critical- and High-risk items identified here must be carried forward into the Hebrews translation_memory.json update and doctrine_risk_registry.json extension, and routed per the escalation rules in 12_ai_translation_requirements.md.