Semantic Analysis — Mark 1–16

Source: Koine Greek (NA28/UBS5 text basis) | Destination: Azerbaijani

Curriculum core passage: Mark 10:35–45 Method: Baseline Romans terms (translation_memory.json) are reused exactly where they recur. New terms required for Mark are analyzed with the same fields: Original word, Transliteration, Literal meaning, Semantic range, English variants, Contextual theological meaning in Mark, Destination-language rendering risk.

---

PART 1 — CORE PASSAGE: Mark 10:35–45 (Verse-by-Verse)

Mark 10:35

Greek: Καὶ προσπορεύονται αὐτῷ Ἰάκωβος καὶ Ἰωάννης οἱ υἱοὶ Ζεβεδαίου λέγοντες αὐτῷ· Διδάσκαλε, θέλομεν ἵνα ὃ ἐὰν αἰτήσωμέν σε ποιήσῃς ἡμῖν.

Load-bearing term: Διδάσκαλε (Didaskale)

• Transliteration: dee-DAHS-kah-leh
• Literal meaning: “Teacher,” vocative of didaskalos
• Semantic range: teacher, rabbi, instructor; used respectfully of Jesus throughout Mark by disciples and outsiders alike
• English variants: Teacher, Master, Rabbi
• Contextual theological meaning: James and John address Jesus with a title of respect that radically understates who he is — the irony of the passage is that the “Teacher” they petition for status is about to redefine greatness itself through the cross.
• Destination-language rendering: Müəllim — Low risk. Established, neutral Azerbaijani word for teacher; no religious loading. Distinguish from Rəbb (Lord), which is reserved for confessional contexts (baseline term); here the disciples have not yet grasped his full identity, so “Müəllim” correctly preserves their limited understanding at this point in the narrative.

Mark 10:36

Greek: ὁ δὲ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς· Τί θέλετέ με ποιήσω ὑμῖν;

No new load-bearing theological term; θέλω (“to want/wish”) is common vocabulary. Jesus’ patient question models pastoral engagement rather than rebuke — relevant background for teaching notes on Servanthood versus Worldly Greatness, but not itself a glossary term.

Mark 10:37

Greek: οἱ δὲ εἶπαν αὐτῷ· Δὸς ἡμῖν ἵνα εἷς σου ἐκ δεξιῶν καὶ εἷς ἐξ ἀριστερῶν καθίσωμεν ἐν τῇ δόξῃ σου.

Load-bearing term: δόξῃ (doxē, dat. of δόξα/doxa)

• Transliteration: DOK-sah
• Literal meaning: glory, splendor, honor
• Semantic range: radiant honor, divine majesty, renown; in the Gospels often tied to Christ’s future royal/eschatological manifestation
• English variants: glory, splendor
• Contextual theological meaning: James and John envision Christ’s doxa as an enthronement scene (cf. Daniel 7) and want co-regent status in it — a request for worldly-style rank inside a genuinely eschatological hope, exposing the disciples’ confusion of the Kingdom Breaking In with a court hierarchy.
• Destination-language rendering: Ehtişam — reuse baseline term exactly (High risk per baseline: avoid nur, which carries Shia devotional “Light of the Imams” associations). No deviation.

Mark 10:38

Greek: ὁ δὲ Ἰησοῦς εἶπεν αὐτοῖς· Οὐκ οἴδατε τί αἰτεῖσθε. δύνασθε πιεῖν τὸ ποτήριον ὃ ἐγὼ πίνω, ἢ τὸ βάπτισμα ὃ ἐγὼ βαπτίζομαι βαπτισθῆναι;

Load-bearing term: ποτήριον (potērion)

• Transliteration: poh-TAY-ree-on
• Literal meaning: cup, drinking vessel
• Semantic range: literal cup; OT metaphor for an appointed portion — often divine wrath or suffering (Ps 75:8; Isa 51:17; Jer 25:15)
• English variants: cup
• Contextual theological meaning: Jesus reframes “glory” as inseparable from his appointed cup of suffering (echoed again in Mark 14:36, Gethsemane). Directly serves the doctrine of the Necessity of the Cross: there is no sharing in Christ’s glory that bypasses sharing in his suffering.
• Destination-language rendering: Kasa — new term, Medium risk. Plain word for cup; risk is purely that readers may take it literally without grasping the OT “cup of suffering/wrath” background. Teaching notes must supply the OT metaphor explicitly on first use; do not substitute a moralizing paraphrase like “sınaq” (trial/test), which loses the specific judicial-suffering nuance.

Load-bearing term: βάπτισμα (baptisma)

• Transliteration: BAHP-tees-mah
• Literal meaning: immersion, baptism
• Semantic range: John’s baptism of repentance (Mark 1:4); here, metaphorically, Jesus’ baptism into suffering/death (cf. Luke 12:50); later, Christian baptism (not in Mark’s narrative proper, but implied by 16:16 in the longer ending)
• English variants: baptism
• Contextual theological meaning: parallel to “cup” — Jesus’ coming death is his own “baptism,” a total immersion into judgment on behalf of others. James and John are asked whether they can share not glory alone but this immersion.
• Destination-language rendering: Vəftiz — new term, Medium risk. Vəftiz is the established loanword used across Azerbaijani Christian literature for baptism, distinguishing it from dəstəmaz/qüsl (Islamic ritual ablution). Risk: readers unfamiliar with Christian vocabulary may assimilate vəftiz to ritual washing for purity rather than the one-time identification with Christ’s death Mark intends here. Teaching notes must clarify that in 10:38 “baptism” is metaphorical, not the ritual act itself.

Mark 10:39

Greek: οἱ δὲ εἶπαν αὐτῷ· Δυνάμεθα. ὁ δὲ Ἰησοῦς εἶπεν αὐτοῖς· Τὸ ποτήριον ὃ ἐγὼ πίνω πίεσθε, καὶ τὸ βάπτισμα ὃ ἐγὼ βαπτίζομαι βαπτισθήσεσθε·

Reuses ποτήριον and βάπτισμα above. James’s later martyrdom (Acts 12:2) and John’s exile/suffering give this verse a grim historical fulfillment; note for teaching material rather than a new glossary term. Jesus grants the request for shared suffering (which they naively affirm) while withholding the request for rank (v.40) — a key structural point for the Servanthood vs. Worldly Greatness doctrine.

Mark 10:40

Greek: τὸ δὲ καθίσαι ἐκ δεξιῶν μου ἢ ἐξ εὐωνύμων οὐκ ἔστιν ἐμὸν δοῦναι, ἀλλ’ οἷς ἡτοίμασται.

No new theological glossary term (καθίσαι “to sit,” δεξιῶν/εὐωνύμων “right/left” are positional, not theological vocabulary as such). Theological weight: Jesus submits even this to the Father’s prior arrangement (ἡτοίμασται, “has been prepared”) — an example of the Father’s sovereign prerogative that intersects with, but does not require a new term beyond, the baseline providence entry (Allahın tədbiri). Flag for teaching notes, not glossary.

Mark 10:41

Greek: Καὶ ἀκούσαντες οἱ δέκα ἤρξαντο ἀγανακτεῖν περὶ Ἰακώβου καὶ Ἰωάννου.

Term: ἀγανακτεῖν (aganaktein) — “to be indignant/angry.” Low risk, ordinary vocabulary (qəzəblənmək / hərslənmək). Included for narrative completeness: the ten’s indignation shows that James and John are not uniquely status-hungry — the whole group is caught in the same worldly-greatness framework the following verses correct. Not a doctrinally loaded term; no glossary entry required beyond this note.

Mark 10:42

Greek: καὶ προσκαλεσάμενος αὐτοὺς ὁ Ἰησοῦς λέγει αὐτοῖς· Οἴδατε ὅτι οἱ δοκοῦντες ἄρχειν τῶν ἐθνῶν κατακυριεύουσιν αὐτῶν καὶ οἱ μεγάλοι αὐτῶν κατεξουσιάζουσιν αὐτῶν.

Load-bearing term: κατακυριεύουσιν (katakyrieuousin) / κατεξουσιάζουσιν (katexousiazousin)

• Transliteration: kah-tah-kyoo-ree-EV-oo-seen / kah-teks-oo-see-AHD-zoo-seen
• Literal meaning: “lord it over” / “exercise harsh authority over” (both intensive compounds — kata- + kyrios/exousia — “down upon,” domineering)
• Semantic range: coercive, self-serving rule; the vocabulary of imperial and patronal domination in the Greco-Roman world (τῶν ἐθνῶν, “the Gentiles/nations” — Rome and its client rulers)
• English variants: lord over, dominate, exercise authority over
• Contextual theological meaning: Jesus names the pattern of worldly greatness precisely so he can overturn it in the next verse. This is the negative pole of the Servanthood versus Worldly Greatness doctrine.
• Destination-language rendering: hökmranlıq etmək / ağalıq etmək — new term, Medium risk. Risk is that a flat, neutral verb for “to rule” could lose the pejorative, domineering force; must select a verb form carrying negative connotation (e.g., “əzabla hökm sürmək” or “ağalıq etmək,” which carries a “playing the master/ağa” connotation) so the contrast with v.43 lands. Note the deliberate echo of baseline’s rejected ağa (master) gloss for kyrios in Romans — here the compound verb intentionally invokes exactly that domineering “ağa” pattern Jesus condemns, which is a useful teaching bridge rather than a contradiction of the baseline’s Lordship terminology.

Mark 10:43

Greek: οὐχ οὕτως δέ ἐστιν ἐν ὑμῖν, ἀλλ’ ὃς ἂν θέλῃ μέγας γενέσθαι ἐν ὑμῖν, ἔσται ὑμῶν διάκονος,

Load-bearing term: διάκονος (diakonos)

• Transliteration: dee-AH-koh-nos
• Literal meaning: one who serves, attendant, table-waiter (root sense)
• Semantic range: household servant; later, the church office of “deacon”; broadly, anyone rendering practical service to another
• English variants: servant, minister, deacon
• Contextual theological meaning: greatness in the Kingdom is redefined as other-directed service, inverting the Gentile-ruler pattern of v.42. This is the positive pole of the servanthood doctrine and anticipates v.45’s Christological ground.
• Destination-language rendering: Xidmətçi — new term, Medium/High risk. Xidmətçi is the natural Azerbaijani word for “one who serves.” Risk: in Azerbaijani social register, “xidmətçi” can carry connotations of menial domestic staff/servant-class status, which could either usefully sharpen the countercultural shock of Jesus’ statement (good) or be dismissed by higher-status readers as beneath their dignity to embrace literally (a pastoral risk to name in teaching notes, not a translation substitution to avoid).

Mark 10:44

Greek: καὶ ὃς ἂν θέλῃ ἐν ὑμῖν εἶναι πρῶτος, ἔσται πάντων δοῦλος·

Load-bearing term: δοῦλος (doulos)

• Transliteration: DOO-los
• Literal meaning: slave, bondservant (one who is owned, not merely employed)
• Semantic range: chattel slave in Greco-Roman society; metaphorically, total, unconditional belonging/submission to a master
• English variants: slave, bondservant, servant
• Contextual theological meaning: Jesus escalates from diakonos (service) to doulos (total, status-erasing ownership by others) — the most radical possible statement of the servanthood doctrine, immediately grounded Christologically in v.45.
• Destination-language rendering: Qul — new term, CRITICAL risk. Qul is the standard Azerbaijani word for “slave/bondservant,” but it is also the foundational Islamic theological self-designation: humanity’s proper relationship to Allah is as Allahın qulu (“Allah’s slave/servant”), a category of honor and right religious posture toward God, not toward other people. Mark 10:44 reverses the axis entirely — believers are called to become qul of one another (horizontally, toward fellow humans), a radically different and culturally jarring claim compared to the vertical, God-directed qul relationship Islamic theology assumes. This must be taught explicitly, not softened by substituting a milder word like xidmətçi (which would collapse the deliberate escalation from v.43) or by avoiding “qul” altogether (which would mute the force of Jesus’ statement). Retain Qul and address the collision directly in teaching material.

Mark 10:45

Greek: καὶ γὰρ ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου οὐκ ἦλθεν διακονηθῆναι ἀλλὰ διακονῆσαι, καὶ δοῦναι τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ λύτρον ἀντὶ πολλῶν.

Load-bearing term: ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου (ho huios tou anthrōpou)

• Transliteration: hoh hwee-OS too an-THROH-poo
• Literal meaning: “the Son of Man”
• Semantic range: (1) generic idiom for “a human being” (as in Ezekiel); (2) the specific apocalyptic figure of Daniel 7:13–14 who receives everlasting dominion from the Ancient of Days; Mark uniquely fuses this exalted-authority sense with (3) a suffering, dying figure — Jesus’ own preferred self-designation throughout Mark, deliberately ambiguous until its content is filled in by the passion predictions
• English variants: Son of Man
• Contextual theological meaning: this is Mark’s central Christological title, tying together Jesus as the Suffering Servant and Son of God doctrine (suffering) with Jesus’ Authority over Sickness, Sin, and Nature (Daniel 7 authority). Romans 10:35-45 is the hinge verse where both senses converge explicitly: the authoritative Danielic figure “did not come to be served” but to die.
• Destination-language rendering: İnsan Oğlu — new term, CRITICAL risk. Literal calque of “Son of Man” is transparent in Azerbaijani but carries a serious risk of being read as merely re-affirming Jesus’ full humanity — a claim Islamic theology already fully accepts and, in fact, insists on (Isa as a human prophet, not divine). Without explicit teaching, Azerbaijani readers are likely to hear İnsan Oğlu as “confirmation” that Jesus is merely human, missing entirely the Daniel 7 authority-and-glory content Mark intends. Every occurrence must be paired in teaching notes with the Daniel 7:13-14 background; never allow İnsan Oğlu to function as a demotion of Allahın Oğlu (Son of God) or Məsih (baseline terms) elsewhere in the same lesson.

Load-bearing term: διακονηθῆναι / διακονῆσαι (diakonēthēnai / diakonēsai)

• Same root as διάκονος above (v.43). Passive “to be served” vs. active “to serve.” Jesus states his mission in these exact terms: not to be served, but to serve. Destination-language rendering: xidmət olunmaq / xidmət etmək — Medium risk, consistent with the Xidmətçi entry above; must be rendered with the same root so the connection to v.43 remains visible to the Azerbaijani reader.

Load-bearing term: δοῦναι τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ (dounai tēn psychēn autou)

• Literal meaning: “to give his soul/life”
• ψυχή (psychē) here means “life” in the sense of one’s whole living self, not a detachable “soul” separate from the body (avoid dualistic overtones). Destination-language rendering: canını vermək (“to give his life/self”) — Medium risk; “can” in Azerbaijani correctly conveys whole-life self-giving rather than a Platonic soul-substance, and avoids conflict with Islamic anthropology of the ruh/nəfs, which is a separate discussion outside this doctrine’s scope.

Load-bearing term: λύτρον (lytron)

• Transliteration: LOO-tron
• Literal meaning: the price paid to redeem/free a slave, captive, or hostage; a ransom-payment
• Semantic range: manumission price for a slave; ransom for a prisoner of war; in LXX usage, echoes of Isaiah 53’s substitutionary suffering servant and of Exodus redemption-price categories
• English variants: ransom, redemption price
• Contextual theological meaning: this is the single most theologically loaded word in the core passage and gives the curriculum’s doctrine its name — the Ransom for Many. Christ’s death is a payment that liberates others from bondage (to sin, per the whole Gospel’s logic) at the cost of his own life.
• Destination-language rendering: Satınalma haqqı (“the price paid to buy back/redeem”) — new term, CRITICAL risk. The most tempting Azerbaijani gloss, fidyə (an Arabic-derived loanword well established in Azerbaijani religious vocabulary for a compensatory religious payment — e.g., the fidyə owed for a missed Ramadan fast-day, or the substitute-sacrifice tradition associated with Qur’an 37:107), is REJECTED. Fidyə operates inside an Islamic legal-compensatory framework (a payment discharging a specific personal religious obligation), not Paul’s/Mark’s framework of one person’s death substituting for the condemnation of “the many.” Using fidyə risks collapsing Christ’s unique, once-for-all substitutionary death into a routine, repeatable religious-legal payment category. Satınalma haqqı (paralleling the baseline’s compound-phrase convention seen in “Hesaba alınan salehlik”) preserves the commercial-redemption image (buying back a slave/captive) without importing the Islamic legal category. Must be taught alongside baseline Xilas (salvation) and imputed_righteousness entries as part of one integrated atonement teaching unit.

Load-bearing term: ἀντὶ πολλῶν (anti pollōn)

• Literal meaning: “in place of/instead of many,” “on behalf of many”
• ἀντί is substitutionary (“in place of”), not merely representative (“on behalf of” in a loose sense) — grammatically the strongest available preposition for substitution in koine Greek.
• Destination-language rendering: çoxlarının əvəzinə (“in place of/instead of many”) — new term, High risk. Must retain the substitutionary force (əvəzinə = “instead of/in place of,” not just “üçün” = generic “for/on behalf of,” which would weaken the substitution to mere benefit-for). This exact substitutionary sense underlies the whole Necessity of the Cross doctrine and must not be flattened.

---

PART 2 — CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER ANALYSIS, MARK 1–16 (FULL BOOK)

Chapter 1

εὐαγγέλιον (euangelion), 1:1, 1:14-15 — Gospel. Reuse baseline exactly: Müjdə (High risk; see baseline notes on İncil-as-disputed-book collision).

[TRANSLATOR NOTE: Mark 1:1 in some early manuscripts omits “Son of God” — a textual-critical variant, not a doctrinal choice. Footnote for translators; do not resolve silently either direction without noting the variant.]

υἱὸς θεοῦ (huios theou), 1:1 — Son of God. Reuse baseline exactly: Allahın Oğlu (Critical; see baseline notes on Qur’an 112:3).

Ἰωάννης ὁ βαπτίζων / βάπτισμα μετανοίας (John the baptizer / baptism of repentance), 1:4-5

• New terms: βαπτίζω (baptizō) “to baptize/immerse” → vəftiz etmək (Medium; see core passage note above); μετάνοια (metanoia) “repentance,” literally “a change of mind/direction” → Tövbə (established loanword shared with Islamic tövbə vocabulary). Risk: Medium-High. Islamic tövbə centers on turning from sin and appealing to Allah’s mercy for forgiveness, generally without reference to a mediating substitutionary death; Mark’s repentance is the doorway into the in-breaking Kingdom and must be taught as inseparable from İman (faith, baseline term) in Christ specifically, not a self-standing act of contrition that itself secures standing.

βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ ἤγγικεν (hē basileia tou theou ēngiken), 1:15 — “The Kingdom of God has come near/drawn near.” Reuse baseline term Allahın Padşahlığı (Medium in Romans) but note: elevate to High risk specifically for this Mark curriculum. Rationale: Romans treats the Kingdom mostly abstractly; Mark’s central doctrinal claim (Kingdom of God Breaking In) requires the perfect-tense force of ἤγγικεν — an already-arriving reality breaking into the present through Jesus’ own ministry — which has no real parallel in Islamic eschatology, where God’s kingdom/rule is exclusively future and apocalyptic (tied to the Day of Judgment and, in Shia expectation, the Twelfth Imam’s return). Azerbaijani rendering: Allahın Padşahlığı yaxınlaşıb (“has drawn near” — present-perfect force). Do not render as simple future (“gələcək,” “will come”), which would erase the inaugurated, already-present dimension Mark insists on.

δαιμόνιον / πνεῦμα ἀκάθαρτον (daimonion / pneuma akatharton), 1:23-27, 1:32-34, 1:39 — “demon” / “unclean spirit”

• Literal meaning: an evil spiritual being; πνεῦμα ἀκάθαρτον emphasizes ritual/moral impurity, δαιμόνιον is the generic term for a lesser malevolent spirit.
• Contextual theological meaning: Jesus’ authority (ἐξουσία, see below) directly confronts and expels these beings — foundational to the doctrine of Jesus’ Authority over Sickness, Sin, and Nature.
• Destination-language rendering: Natəmiz ruh (unclean spirit) / cin (REJECTED). High risk. Azerbaijani folk Islam retains a robust popular belief in cin (jinn) — capricious, morally ambiguous spirit-beings that can be bound, warded off, or negotiated with through amulets, folk-Islamic practitioners, or Qur’anic recitation rather than decisively expelled by a single sovereign command. Using cin for Mark’s daimonia would import this entire folk-religious framework of manageable, semi-independent spirits rather than Mark’s picture of beings wholly and immediately subject to Christ’s authority. Natəmiz ruh (calqued directly from the Greek) avoids this collision; cin must never be used in this curriculum.

ἐξουσία (exousia), 1:22, 1:27 — “authority”

• Literal meaning: delegated right/power to act; the authority of one who has the standing to command
• Semantic range: political rule, legal right, moral authority, supernatural command-authority
• Contextual theological meaning: Mark’s crowds are repeatedly “astonished” (ch.1) at an authority in Jesus’ teaching and exorcisms unlike the scribes’ — this is the load-bearing term for the whole doctrine of Jesus’ Authority over Sickness, Sin, and Nature (recurring 2:10, 3:15, 6:7, 11:28-33, 13:34).
• Destination-language rendering: Səlahiyyət — new term, High risk. Risk of two kinds: (1) confusion with purely administrative/political “authority” (a government official’s səlahiyyəti), which would flatten the supernatural dimension; (2) confusion with clerical religious authority (a mullah’s interpretive authority derived from training and lineage), which would wrongly place Jesus’ authority on the same derived, institutional spectrum rather than as an authority intrinsic to who he is. Teaching notes must specify which sense is active at each occurrence.

λέπρα / λεπρός, καθαρός / ἀκάθαρτος (leprosy/leper, clean/unclean) — first appears ch.1:40-45; recurs ch.14:3 (Simon the leper)

• Contextual theological meaning: touching a leper should render Jesus ritually unclean by the purity system; instead his touch makes the leper clean — a reversal of the purity logic, anticipating Mark 7’s fuller redefinition.
• Destination-language rendering: Cüzam(lı) (leprosy/leper — established medical/Biblical loanword, Low risk) and Təmiz / Natəmiz (clean/unclean, ritual sense). Medium risk: Azerbaijani Islamic culture retains a strong tahara/najasat (ritual purity/impurity) framework (ablution before prayer, dietary purity, etc.). Mark’s clean/unclean vocabulary must be taught as a distinct, first-century Jewish ritual-purity system that Jesus is engaging and ultimately relativizing (fully unpacked in ch.7), not simply mapped onto the reader’s own purity intuitions.

Chapter 2

ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου … ἀφιέναι ἁμαρτίας (2:10) — Son of Man’s authority to forgive sins. Reuses İnsan Oğlu (see core passage, Critical) and baseline Günah (sin, High). New point: the scribes’ internal objection (“this is blasphemy — only God forgives sins,” 2:7) makes 2:10 an early, deliberate deity claim embedded in a Son of Man saying — teaching notes should connect this directly to the deity_of_christ doctrine in the baseline registry.

νηστεύω (nēsteuō), 2:18-20 — “to fast”

• Destination-language rendering: Oruc tutmaq — established loanword shared directly with Islamic Ramadan vocabulary (Oruc). Medium risk: Islamic fasting is an obligatory pillar with fixed calendar timing; Mark 2:18-20 presents fasting as a voluntary devotional practice whose appropriateness is governed by the presence or absence of “the bridegroom” (Christ) — a Christ-centered, not calendar-centered, logic. Teaching notes should make this contrast explicit rather than assuming shared meaning from the shared word.

σάββατον (sabbaton), 2:23-28 — “Sabbath”

• Destination-language rendering: Şənbə (günü) — new term, Medium risk. Distinguish clearly from Cümə (Friday, the Islamic day of congregational prayer); the Sabbath is the Mosaic seventh-day rest command (reuse baseline Qanun, Mosaic Law, High risk), and Mark 2:27-28 (“the Sabbath was made for man… the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath”) is itself another authority/lordship claim tied to İnsan Oğlu and baseline Rəbb.

Chapter 3

Reuses: natəmiz ruh (unclean spirit, 3:11, 3:30), ἐξουσία/Səlahiyyət (authority, 3:15, given to the Twelve).

ἀπόστολος (apostolos), 3:14 — the Twelve named “apostles.” Reuse baseline exactly: Həvari (Medium; guard against Imamate-succession associations per baseline notes).

βλασφημία εἰς τὸ Πνεῦμα τὸ Ἅγιον (blasphemy against the Holy Spirit), 3:28-29 — new term.

• Destination-language rendering: Müqəddəs Ruha qarşı küfr — High risk. Küfr is the standing Azerbaijani/Islamic legal-religious term for blasphemy/unbelief, carrying serious cultural and historically legal weight distinct from a milder Western “blasphemy” register. Reuse baseline Müqəddəs Ruh exactly (Critical; guard against Cəbrail/archangel Gabriel substitution). Teaching notes should address the cultural weight küfr carries without softening Mark’s own severity here.

Chapter 4

παραβολή (parabolē), 4:2 and throughout — “parable.” New term, Low risk. Destination-language rendering: Məsəl — an established, doctrinally neutral literary term.

τὸ μυστήριον τῆς βασιλείας τοῦ θεοῦ (to mystērion tēs basileias tou theou), 4:11 — “the mystery/secret of the Kingdom of God.” New term.

• Destination-language rendering: Allahın Padşahlığının sirri — Medium risk. Reuse baseline Allahın Padşahlığı exactly. Risk: sirr (secret/mystery) risks assimilation to Sufi/Batini traditions of hidden esoteric knowledge reserved for spiritual initiates. Mark’s mystērion is not esoteric gnosis but a disclosed-yet-veiled reality — perceivable by faith-responsive “insiders” (the disciples) and opaque to faith-resistant “outsiders,” a distinction that must be taught, not assumed from the word alone. Directly relevant to the Messianic Secret doctrine’s parable strand.

ὀλιγόπιστος-type language / φόβος (fear) and faith, 4:40 — “Why are you afraid? Have you still no faith?” Reuse baseline İman exactly (High). New pairing: fear (φόβος, qorxu — Low risk, ordinary vocabulary) set directly against faith — the first clear instance of the Faith and Discipleship amid Fear doctrine, recurring through 5:36, 6:50, 9:24, 10:32, 16:8.

Chapter 5

Reuses: natəmiz ruh/daimonion (unclean spirit — “Legion,” 5:1-13), İman (faith, 5:34, 5:36), qorxu (fear, 5:33, 5:36), təmiz/natəmiz purity vocabulary (the woman with the flow of blood, 5:25-34, touches Jesus in a state of ritual impurity — same reversal pattern as ch.1’s leper).

Λεγιών (Legiōn), 5:9 — proper name (a Roman military unit of several thousand men) used self-referentially by the unclean spirits. New term, Low risk (proper noun, transliterate as Legion), but worth a teaching note on the political-military overtone (Roman occupying power imagery) reinforcing the scale of the authority Jesus exercises over hostile powers.

Chapter 6

ἀποστέλλω (apostellō) / ἀποστολή-type sending, 6:7-13 — the Twelve sent out with authority over unclean spirits. Reuses Səlahiyyət (authority) and natəmiz ruh. Ties to baseline mission doctrine (Müjdə yayma xidməti).

σπλαγχνίζομαι (splagchnizomai), 6:34 — “he had compassion” (lit. “was moved in his inward parts/bowels”)

• New term, Low-Medium risk. Destination-language rendering: ürəyi yandı / rəhmi gəldi (“his heart burned”/“he was moved with mercy”). Do not substitute baseline Lütf (grace) or mərhəmət (mercy, rejected elsewhere as a grace-substitute) — this is a distinct verb describing Jesus’ visceral emotional reaction, not a technical soteriological term; keep as ordinary compassionate-feeling vocabulary. Recurs 8:2, 9:22 (a father’s plea).

ἐγώ εἰμι (egō eimi), 6:50 — “It is I” (walking on water). New term, Critical risk.

• Contextual theological meaning: possible echo of the divine self-disclosure formula (LXX Exodus 3:14; Isaiah 43). In context of Jesus commanding the sea (a power reserved for God alone in the OT — Job 38:11, Ps 107:29), this is an authority-over-nature claim reinforced by a divine-sounding self-identification.
• Destination-language rendering: Mənəm (“It is I / I am”) — flag for human theologian review every occurrence (recurs 14:62). Must not be flattened to a merely reassuring “it’s just me” register; teaching notes should surface the possible Exodus 3:14 echo without overclaiming certainty, consistent with responsible handling of a debated allusion.

Chapter 7

παράδοσις τῶν πρεσβυτέρων (paradosis tōn presbyterōn), 7:3-13 — “the tradition of the elders.” New term, Low-Medium risk. Destination-language rendering: ağsaqqalların ənənəsi. Useful bridge concept: Azerbaijani culture already has strong respect for ağsaqqal (elder) tradition, making the concept immediately intelligible; the risk is purely that readers may sympathize with “honoring tradition” and miss Jesus’ critique of tradition displacing God’s actual command (7:8-9).

κοινός / κοινόω (koinos / koinoō), 7:2, 7:15, 7:18-23 — “common/defiled” / “to defile”

• Literal meaning: ritually common (i.e., not set apart/clean); to render unclean
• Contextual theological meaning: “There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him… nothing that comes out of a person is what defiles him” (7:15) — Jesus relocates defilement from external, ritual/dietary categories to the internal moral condition of the heart (7:21-23, vice list). This is one of the sharpest points of contact with Islamic halal/haram dietary-purity categories in the entire book.
• Destination-language rendering: murdar / murdarlamaq (distinct from the ritual-purity pair təmiz/natəmiz used for leprosy and bodily discharge in chs. 1 and 5). High risk. Azerbaijani Muslim readers operate within an active halal/haram dietary framework; Mark 7’s redefinition of defilement as heart-originating rather than food-originating is not an abstract point but a direct challenge to an everyday practiced category. Must be taught carefully and explicitly, not softened into a vague “attitude matters too” statement that leaves the food-purity framework intact alongside it.

Συροφοινίκισσα (the Syrophoenician woman), 7:24-30 — a Gentile woman’s persistent faith secures her daughter’s deliverance. Reuses baseline Millətlər (gentiles) conceptually (though the woman is not called ethnē here by name, the narrative functions as an enacted instance of gentile inclusion) and İman. Ties to baseline unity_of_jews_and_gentiles doctrine — flag Medium, Native speaker review, consistent with baseline routing.

Chapter 8

ζύμη τῶν Φαρισαίων (the leaven/yeast of the Pharisees), 8:15 — idiom for corrupting influence; Low risk, teach as metaphor (Fərisilərin mayası), not a technical term.

Σὺ εἶ ὁ Χριστός (Su ei ho Christos), 8:29 — Peter’s confession, “You are the Christ.” Reuse baseline Məsih exactly (Critical; per baseline, must always carry full Davidic-covenant, atoning-savior content, not the emptied Qur’anic al-Masih sense).

ἐπετίμησεν αὐτοῖς ἵνα μηδενὶ λέγωσιν περὶ αὐτοῦ (8:30) — “he warned them to tell no one about him.” New term/motif: the Messianic Secret command itself.

• Destination-language rendering: kimsəyə deməsinlər deyə xəbərdarlıq etdi. High risk (named curriculum doctrine). Risk: readers may assimilate this secrecy motif to Sufi/Batini traditions of esoteric hidden knowledge reserved for an inner circle, or conversely conclude Jesus was ashamed or uncertain of his identity. Teaching notes must frame the secrecy as strategic and pedagogical — controlling the timing and content of messianic disclosure until it can be filled with cross-shaped content (immediately following, 8:31) — not as concealment of doubtful or esoteric truth.

δεῖ (dei), 8:31 — “it is necessary/must” (the Son of Man must suffer). New term, High risk.

• Literal meaning: impersonal verb of necessity, “it is necessary/binding”
• Contextual theological meaning: the first Passion prediction states the cross as a divine necessity, not an accident or a defeat to be avoided — foundational to the Necessity of the Cross doctrine.
• Destination-language rendering: lazımdır / gərəkdir (“it is necessary”). Risk: a flat rendering can read as mere circumstantial obligation; teaching notes must clarify this is theological necessity rooted in the Father’s redemptive plan and the fulfillment of Scripture (cf. Isaiah 53), not fatalistic inevitability (avoid any drift toward baseline’s rejected qismət/alın yazısı fatalism vocabulary).

ἀπαρνησάσθω ἑαυτόν / ἄρας τὸν σταυρὸν αὐτοῦ (8:34) — “let him deny himself and take up his cross.” New terms.

• Destination-language rendering: özündən imtina etsin, çarmıxını götürsün. High risk. (“Çarmıx,” not “xaç” — see Chapter 15 note below for the ethnic-political reasoning; anticipate that reasoning here since the term first occurs in this chapter.) Teaching notes: self-denial here is not generic asceticism (a point of possible false resonance with Sufi ascetic renunciation) but specifically taking up an instrument of shameful execution in following a crucified Messiah.

Chapter 9

μετεμορφώθη (metemorphōthē), 9:2 — “he was transfigured.” New term, Medium-High risk. Destination-language rendering: görkəmi dəyişdi / cəlallandı. Ties to baseline Ehtişam (glory): Jesus’ true, hidden glory becomes momentarily visible. Recommend pairing with Ehtişam explicitly rather than introducing a separate unrelated glory-term.

ἀκούετε αὐτοῦ (akouete autou), 9:7 — the divine voice’s command, “Listen to him.” New term, High risk. Echoes Deuteronomy 18:15 (“a prophet like Moses… you shall listen to him”) — ties directly to baseline fulfillment_of_prophecy and prophet doctrines, elevating Jesus above Moses and Elijah who appear alongside him (9:4-5). Destination-language rendering: Onu dinləyin.

Ἠλίας (Elijah), 9:11-13 — proper name. Low risk, and a genuine point of cultural resonance: Elijah (İlyas) is also a recognized prophetic figure in Islamic tradition, providing an unusually strong bridge for teaching Mark’s “Elijah must first come” (fulfilled in John the Baptist) without needing to introduce an unfamiliar figure from scratch.

Πιστεύω· βοήθει μου τῇ ἀπιστίᾳ (9:24) — “I believe; help my unbelief.” Reuses baseline İman and introduces ἀπιστία (apistia), “unbelief/lack of faith.” Medium risk, ordinary vocabulary (imansızlıq), but theologically important as the clearest statement in Mark that faith and doubt coexist in genuine discipleship — central to Faith and Discipleship amid Fear.

Chapter 10

ἀφίημι / διαζεύγνυμι (divorce), 10:2-12 — new vocabulary (boşanma, divorce), Low-Medium risk, primarily a pastoral/cultural-practice topic rather than a doctrine-collision term; flag for native speaker review per baseline’s “cultural practices” routing category, not theologian review.

ζωὴ αἰώνιος (zōē aiōnios), 10:17, 10:30 — “eternal life.” New term, High risk. Destination-language rendering: əbədi həyat. Risk: could be conflated with the more future-only, paradise-entry framing baseline already flags for salvation (reject cənnətə girmək as a substitute); teach zōē aiōnios as a quality and relationship of life beginning now (consistent with baseline’s insistence that Xilas is a present reality), not solely a post-mortem destination.

CORE PASSAGE, 10:35-45 — see Part 1 above in full.

υἱὲ Δαυίδ (huie Dauid), 10:47-48 — “Son of David,” Bartimaeus’s cry for mercy. New term, High risk. Destination-language rendering: Davudun Oğlu (reuse baseline Davud proper name exactly). Ties directly to baseline davidic_covenant doctrine (High); a blind beggar’s messianic recognition contrasts pointedly with James and John’s status-seeking blindness earlier in the same chapter.

Chapter 11

Ὡσαννά (Hōsanna), 11:9-10 — transliterated Hebrew liturgical acclamation (“save now!” originally, but functioning as an acclamation of praise by this period). New term, Low risk: retain transliteration Hosanna, per the baseline’s convention for retaining untranslated liturgical/Aramaic-Hebrew terms (cf. Abba).

ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν Δαυίδ (11:10) — “the coming kingdom of our father David.” New term, High risk. Reuses baseline Allahın Padşahlığı and davidic_covenant; the crowd’s nationalistic-messianic expectation (a restored earthly Davidic kingdom) sets up the Kingdom of God Breaking In doctrine’s central tension — Jesus fulfills but redefines this expectation away from a political-military restoration.

οἶκος προσευχῆς / σπήλαιον λῃστῶν (11:17) — “house of prayer” / “den of robbers” (temple cleansing). New terms, Medium risk. Destination-language rendering: dua evi / quldurlar yuvası. Teaching note: this is a prophetic indictment (quoting Isaiah 56:7 and Jeremiah 7:11) of corrupted worship, relevant background for the Necessity of the Cross narrative arc (the temple incident precipitates the final conflict leading to Jesus’ arrest).

ἐξουσία (11:28-33) — reuses Səlahiyyət (authority); the religious leaders directly question the source of Jesus’ authority, textbook instance of the Authority doctrine’s central conflict.

Chapter 12

τὴν κεφαλὴν γωνίας (tēn kephalēn gōnias), 12:10 — “the cornerstone” (quoting Ps 118:22). New term, Medium-High risk. Destination-language rendering: guşə daşı / bünövrə daşı. Ties fulfillment_of_prophecy doctrine to the parable of the tenants’ rejected/vindicated son imagery — an oblique but pointed messianic and passion-resurrection claim.

Καίσαρι … εἰκὼν (Caesar / image), 12:14-17 — “Render to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.” New terms: Qeysər (Caesar, proper name/title, Low risk) and surət/təsvir (image, Medium risk — ties to the imago Dei background without needing a full new doctrine entry). Flag per baseline’s “government/authority” native-speaker-review category (Romans 13 parallel).

Ἄκουε, Ἰσραήλ, Κύριος ὁ θεὸς ἡμῶν Κύριος εἷς ἐστιν (12:29, quoting Deut 6:4, the Shema) — new term, Critical risk. Reuses baseline Rəbb and Allah exactly. Contextual meaning: Jesus affirms the Shema’s strict monotheism as “the first commandment,” which is a genuine and important point of theological common ground with Islamic tawhid — flag explicitly as a bridge point, while noting that Mark elsewhere (esp. 12:35-37, immediately following) has Jesus complicate simple monotheistic categories by questioning how the Messiah can be both David’s son and David’s Lord (Ps 110:1) — anticipating the deity_of_christ tension rather than resolving it away.

ἀνάστασις (anastasis), 12:18-27 — “resurrection,” debated with the Sadducees. Reuse baseline Diriliş exactly (Critical). Note for teaching material: here the topic is the general future resurrection of the dead (a category Islamic eschatology does affirm, at the Day of Judgment), distinct from but preparatory for Mark’s climactic claim of Christ’s own specific, past-tense, historical resurrection in ch.16. Distinguish the two referents explicitly in lesson material.

Chapter 13

τὸ βδέλυγμα τῆς ἐρημώσεως (to bdelygma tēs erēmōseōs), 13:14 — “the abomination of desolation” (quoting Daniel). New term, Medium risk. Destination-language rendering: viranəliyin iyrənc şeyi. Requires OT/Danielic background teaching; without it, the phrase is opaque rather than doctrinally dangerous.

κηρυχθῆναι τὸ εὐαγγέλιον εἰς πάντα τὰ ἔθνη (13:10) — “the gospel must first be preached to all nations.” Reuses baseline Müjdə and Millətlər exactly; ties to baseline universal_scope_of_gospel and mission doctrines.

ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ἐρχόμενον ἐν νεφέλαις (13:26) — Son of Man coming in the clouds (Daniel 7 again, now explicit). Reuses İnsan Oğlu (Critical); this is the clearest full disclosure of the Danielic-authority sense flagged in the core passage.

γρηγορεῖτε (grēgoreite), 13:33-37 — “watch/be alert/stay awake.” New term, Low-Medium risk. Destination-language rendering: ayıq olun. Straightforward eschatological vigilance exhortation; recurs 14:34, 14:37-38 (Gethsemane), linking the eschatological and passion narratives.

οἱ ἐκλεκτοί (hoi eklektoi), 13:20, 13:22, 13:27 — “the elect.” Reuse baseline Seçilmə family exactly (High; avoid qismət/fatalism substitutes per baseline).

Chapter 14

τὸ αἷμά μου τῆς διαθήκης (to haima mou tēs diathēkēs), 14:24 — “my blood of the covenant.” Reuse baseline Əhd exactly (Medium in Romans; elevate to High/Critical here given the direct Lord’s Supper/atonement context). Destination-language rendering: Əhdimin qanı. New paired term σῶμά μου (sōma mou), “my body,” rendered bədənim. High risk pastoral note: some hearers may (mis)read “this is my body/blood” with a literalism that provokes visceral cultural resistance (parallel to general Islamic and broader Middle Eastern discomfort with blood-consumption imagery, cf. dietary blood prohibitions); teaching material must frame this within its Passover-meal, covenant-ratification context (echoing Exodus 24:8) rather than leaving it to be read as literal.

τὸ πάσχα (to pascha), 14:1, 14:12-16 — “the Passover.” New term, Medium risk. Destination-language rendering: Pasxa bayramı, always qualified in first use as yəhudilərin Pasxa bayramı (“the Jews’ Passover feast”) to prevent conflation with the Russian-Orthodox-influenced popular Azerbaijani association of “Pasxa” primarily with Christian Easter. Without this qualifier, readers may miss that Jesus’ Last Supper is deliberately set within the Old Testament exodus-redemption festival, a background essential to the Ransom for Many doctrine’s OT roots.

Ἀββά ὁ πατήρ (Abba ho patēr), 14:36 — Gethsemane prayer. Reuse baseline Abba and Ata exactly (Abba: Medium; Ata as Father: Critical, per baseline notes on tawhid sensitivity). New contextual note: Jesus’ own anguished use of this intimate address while facing the “cup” (v.36, reusing Kasa) models the Faith and Discipleship amid Fear doctrine at its most acute — even the Son experiences dread while remaining obedient, a crucial pastoral resource distinct from stoic fatalism.

παραδίδωμι (paradidōmi), 14:10-11, 14:18, 14:21, 14:41-42 — “to hand over/betray.” New term, Medium-High risk. Destination-language rendering: ələ vermək / satmaq. Theological nuance: the same verb describes both Judas’s culpable betrayal and, elsewhere in Mark’s passion predictions, the divinely-purposed “handing over” of the Son of Man (e.g., 9:31, 10:33) — human treachery operating within, but not excusing itself by, God’s sovereign redemptive plan. Consistent with baseline’s providence framework (Allahın tədbiri) but must not collapse into determinism that removes Judas’s culpability.

Σὺ εἶ ὁ Χριστός, ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ εὐλογητοῦ; … Ἐγώ εἰμι (14:61-62) — the high priest’s question (“Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?”) and Jesus’ answer, “I am.” New terms: ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ εὐλογητοῦ (ho huios tou eulogētou), “the Son of the Blessed [One]” — a Jewish reverential circumlocution for God, functionally equivalent to “Son of God.” Destination-language rendering: Mübarəkin Oğlu, Critical risk, teach as equivalent in force to baseline Allahın Oğlu. Jesus’ reply Ἐγώ εἰμι — reuse Mənəm (Critical, see ch.6 note) — is the clearest, most direct self-identification claim in the entire Gospel and the direct legal basis for the βλασφημία (blasphēmia) charge that follows (14:64) — reuse Küfr (High, see ch.3 note). This is the theological climax of the Messianic Secret doctrine: the secret is now fully and irrevocably disclosed, at the cost of Jesus’ life.

Chapter 15

σταυρός / σταυρόω (stauros / staurōo), 15:13-15, 15:20-27, 15:30-32 — “cross” / “to crucify.” New terms, HIGH risk — culturally and politically sensitive, in addition to the doctrinal weight already flagged in the baseline’s forbidden-substitution logic.

• Destination-language rendering: Çarmıx / çarmıxa çəkmək. Do not use xaç for the cross in this context. Rationale: in contemporary Azerbaijani popular usage, xaç (cross) is strongly associated with Armenian Apostolic Christian identity and church iconography, given the decades-long Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh; using xaç risks unintentionally coding the crucifixion narrative with contemporary ethnic-political associations entirely foreign to the biblical text. Çarmıx, the term for the execution stake/instrument itself, is the established, religiously and politically neutral Bible-translation choice and must be used consistently for all crucifixion vocabulary (also applies to 8:34’s “take up his cross,” corrected above).

ὁ βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων (ho basileus tōn Ioudaiōn), 15:2, 15:9, 15:12, 15:18, 15:26 — “the King of the Jews.” New term, Medium-High risk. Destination-language rendering: Yəhudilərin Padşahı. Reuse baseline İsrail proper-name sensitivity note (contemporary diplomatic/political awareness); the title is used mockingly by Pilate’s soldiers and inscribed on the cross as an unwitting proclamation of truth — theological irony central to how Mark narrates the Necessity of the Cross.

Ἀληθῶς οὗτος ὁ ἄνθρωπος υἱὸς θεοῦ ἦν (15:39) — the centurion’s confession, “Truly this man was the Son of God.” Reuse baseline Allahın Oğlu exactly (Critical). Theological/cultural significance: the first unambiguous human confession of Jesus’ divine sonship in Mark’s Gospel comes from a Gentile Roman soldier at the cross, not from a Jewish disciple — a powerful enacted instance of both the deity_of_christ and unity_of_jews_and_gentiles doctrines converging at the crucifixion.

τὸ καταπέτασμα (to katapetasma), 15:38 — “the [temple] curtain/veil,” torn in two. New term, Medium risk. Destination-language rendering: məbədin pərdəsi. Symbolic marker of opened access to God’s presence, occurring at the exact moment of Jesus’ death — worth flagging for teaching notes connecting the cross to restored access, without overloading a single-word translation risk.

Chapter 16

ἠγέρθη (ēgerthē), 16:6 — “he has been raised” (divine passive — God is the implied agent). Reuse baseline Diriliş exactly (Critical; see baseline notes on Qur’an 4:157’s denial of Christ’s death). Destination-language rendering of the announcement: O dirildi / O dirildi (“he has risen/he was raised”), consistently paired with the empty-tomb narrative affirming a real, prior death (16:1-5) — never permit any drift toward a no-death-ascension framing.

[TEXTUAL-CRITICAL NOTE, not a doctrinal glossary term: Mark 16:9-20 (the “longer ending”) is absent from the earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus) and is widely regarded by textual critics as a later addition. This curriculum should follow standard practice: include 16:9-20 with a clear editorial note on its textual status (most study Bibles bracket it or footnote it), rather than silently presenting it as textually equivalent to 16:1-8. This is a scholarly-integrity issue distinct from, and should not be confused with, the doctrinal collision risks flagged elsewhere in this document.]

If the longer ending is included in curriculum materials, note new terms: κηρύξατε τὸ εὐαγγέλιον πάσῃ τῇ κτίσει (16:15), “proclaim the gospel to all creation” — reuses baseline Müjdə, Millətlər/mission vocabulary; ties to universal_scope_of_gospel doctrine.

---

Summary of Chapters Introducing No New Load-Bearing Terms

All sixteen chapters of Mark contain load-bearing theological vocabulary relevant to this curriculum; no chapter is doctrinally empty. Chapters 3, 5, 6, and 9 in particular are dominated by terms already introduced in earlier chapters (unclean spirit, authority, faith/fear, compassion) rather than substantial new vocabulary, and are treated above with that explicitly noted where applicable.