Linguistic Gap Analysis — Revelation 1–22

Destination Language: Azerbaijani

This document executes Phase 1 Step 8 of the TRI pipeline for the Revelation curriculum, extending the baseline Romans Language Package. It identifies where Azerbaijani lacks vocabulary for Revelation’s distinctive doctrinal content, where existing vocabulary is too crowded with competing religious associations (chiefly Shia Twelver Islam and Azerbaijani folk religion) to be used without fencing, and where transliteration is preferable to paraphrase. It closes with a ranked list of this book’s highest-risk ambiguities. It builds directly on 07_semantic_analysis.md, 08_core_glossary.md, and the extended bible_term_registry.json, and does not contradict any baseline Romans term.

Full-book coverage statement: Every chapter of Revelation (1–22) has been reviewed for this analysis. Chapters that introduce no new lexical gap beyond terms already resolved in the Core Glossary are explicitly logged as “reviewed, no new gap” below rather than omitted.

---

0. Full-Book Chapter Coverage Ledger

Ch.	Load-bearing gap-analysis contribution	Status
1	Vəhy (genre/title collision), İnsan Oğlu theophany under-reading risk, Əlfa/Omeqa, dözüm/sıxıntı pair, Ölülər diyarı	New gaps analyzed
2	Şahid/şəhid, tövbə, cənnət/həyat ağacı, səhər ulduzu, dözüm	New gaps analyzed
3	Davudun açarı, Yeni Yerusəlim (first mention), İmansızlar precursor, sadiq/haqq	New gaps analyzed
4	Taxt, hər şeyə qadir, canlı məxluqlar, ağsaqqal, trisagion müqəddəs	New gaps analyzed
5	Quzu (central), səcdə, qanla satın alınmış, tumar	New gaps analyzed
6	Qəzəb (Lamb’s wrath), ölülər diyarı, canlı məxluqlar	Reviewed — reuses ch.1/4/5 resolutions
7	Möhür, millətlər universal scope, xilas as worship-shout, sıxıntı	New gaps analyzed
8	Şeypur, nimçə (bowl of incense), müqəddəslərin duaları/vasitəçilik	New gaps analyzed
9	Dibsiz quyu, damğa precursor imagery	New gaps analyzed
10	Allahın sirri (mystery), tumar (little scroll)	New gaps analyzed
11	İki şahid, vəhşi heyvan (first full appearance), Allahın Padşahlığı declaration	New gaps analyzed
12	Əjdaha, qədim ilan, şeytan/iblis, gəlin-adjacent woman-imagery (non-Bride)	New gaps analyzed
13	Vəhşi heyvan (second beast), yalançı peyğəmbər, damğa, 666	New gaps analyzed
14	Böyük Babil (first mention), qanla satın alınmış (144,000), qəzəb	Reviewed — reuses ch.5/13 resolutions
15	Nimçə, hər şeyə qadir, canlı məxluqlar	Reviewed — reuses ch.4/5 resolutions
16	Har-Magedon, qəzəb bowls, yalançı peyğəmbər	New gaps analyzed
17	Fahişə, böyük Babil, vəhşi heyvan	New gaps analyzed
18	Böyük Babil (judgment), ağı (lament) vs mərsiyə fencing	New gaps analyzed
19	Padşahların Padşahı, Allahın Kəlamı, gəlin/Quzunun toyu, müqəddəslərin saleh əməlləri	New gaps analyzed
20	Diriliş (first/second), böyük ağ taxt, od gölü, ikinci ölüm, min il	New gaps analyzed
21	Core passage. Yeni göy və yeni yer, Yeni Yerusəlim, Allahın məskəni, gəlin, oğul/inherit, imansızlar, od gölü, pulsuz	New gaps analyzed (anchor chapter)
22	Həyat ağacı/suyu, lənət, tezliklə gəlirəm, əlavə/çıxarmaq warning, səhər ulduzu (recur)	New gaps analyzed

---

Section A — Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix

For each of the nine curriculum doctrines: available Azerbaijani terms, their weaknesses, and the recommended handling strategy.

Doctrine	Available AZ Terms	Weaknesses	Recommended Strategy
The Return and Reign of Christ	Allahın Padşahlığı (baseline), Padşahların Padşahı və Rəbblərin Rəbbi, Tezliklə gəlirəm	”Padşahlıq” risks being heard as a literal political state given Azerbaijan’s secular constitutional framework; “Tezliklə gəlirəm” invites structural comparison to awaited-Mahdi eschatology (a hidden, promised, undated return)	Retain baseline Padşahlıq rendering; always pair Padşahların Padşahı with Rəbb (never Ağa); teach Christ’s return as his own return, not a distinct intermediary figure — use the Mahdi parallel only as a bridge-point that is then explicitly redirected to Christ
The Sovereignty of God over History	Allahın tədbiri (baseline providence), Hər şeyə Qadir (Almighty), Taxt	Qismət/alın yazısı fatalism gravity is strong in folk speech; Taxt risks evoking historical Azerbaijani/regional khanate court imagery rather than transcendent rule	Pair Hər şeyə Qadir consistently with Taxt and Allah/Quzu referents to keep divine, not political, sovereignty in view; reuse Allahın tədbiri for narrative-purpose statements (8:28-style)
Perseverance and Faithful Witness under Persecution	Dözüm (endurance), Sıxıntı (affliction), Şahid/Şahidlik (witness)	Səbir (rejected) carries fatalistic-submission freight; Şəhid (rejected as primary) is Azerbaijan’s most emotionally saturated religious-devotional term (Karbala/Ashura)	Fence dözüm against səbir explicitly in teaching notes; use şahid/şahidlik as the term-family, with a standing footnote distinguishing it from şəhid every time death-unto-testimony is described (1:5, 9; 2:13; 6:9; 11; 17:6; 20:4)
Judgment of the Wicked and Vindication of the Saints	Böyük ağ taxt, Od gölü, İkinci ölüm, Qəzəb	Cəhənnəm import risk (differing doctrinal architecture: levels, sin-specific punishment, intercession-reducible sentence); Qiyamət-scene visual overlap may import an entirely different judgment mechanism (deeds-scales)	Retain Od gölü as primary; use Cəhənnəm only as a bounded explanatory gloss; anchor the deciding factor explicitly to the Həyat kitabı/union-with-the-Lamb basis, not a scales-of-deeds mechanism
The New Heaven and New Earth	Yeni göy və yeni yer, Lənət (removed)	Islamic Qiyamət doctrine generally teaches destruction-and-replacement of the present world rather than renewal/continuity; readers may default to the replacement frame	Require an explicit teaching note at first use (21:1) distinguishing renewal-of-the-existing-creation from a wholly discontinuous re-creation
The Church as Bride of Christ	Gəlin, Quzunun toyu	No natural devotional parallel: Allah is never spoken of in nuptial terms toward a human community in Islamic devotional register; risk of the metaphor landing as strange or even inappropriate rather than intimate	Introduce with deliberate corporate-covenantal framing (the Church collectively, not individual believers, is the Bride) before the wedding imagery is used; do not let the metaphor stand unexplained
Worship of the Lamb	Səcdə etmək / İbadət etmək, Quzu	Səcdə is precisely the prostration posture Islamic practice (namaz) reserves exclusively for Allah; extending it to the Lamb is the text’s own deliberate claim, not a rendering error to soften	Retain səcdə deliberately; use the angel’s self-refusal of worship (19:10; 22:8-9) as the internal textual proof that Revelation itself polices creature-worship, making the Lamb’s inclusion in worship a considered claim, not an oversight
Symbolic and Apocalyptic Interpretation	Tumar, Şeypur, Nimçə, Vəhy	”Vəhy” collides with the Islamic technical category of prophetic revelation culminating in the Qur’an as final/superseding; readers may treat all of Revelation’s imagery through a divination/tafsir-style decoding lens rather than typological-symbolic reading	Teach a first-use framing note on Vəhy (disclosure of Christ himself, not a rival law-code); provide consistent visual/symbolic vocabulary (tumar, şeypur, nimçə) without over-literalizing images
Assurance of God’s Final Victory over Evil	Tamamlandı!, Mən hər şeyi yeni edirəm, Diriliş	Islamic soteriology generally defers certainty of outcome to Judgment Day; a present-tense, settled-fact declaration of victory (Γέγονεν) may read as overconfident or theologically presumptuous against that backdrop	Preserve the perfect/present-tense force exactly (do not shift to future tense); coordinate with baseline’s Assurance of Salvation doctrine notes from Romans 8

---

Section B — Missing Vocabulary (True Lexical Gaps)

These concepts have no existing single Azerbaijani word or settled Bible-translation phrase; each requires a constructed compound, already proposed in the Core Glossary, which this analysis confirms as the best available option.

Concept	Gap Type	Constructed Solution	Rationale
Second Death (θάνατος δεύτερος)	No Islamic or folk-religious parallel concept exists (one death, one resurrection, one judgment, one eternal abode in Islamic eschatology)	İkinci ölüm (literal compound)	A wholly novel technical category for the audience; literal compounding avoids false-friend borrowing and signals “listen carefully, this is new”
Millennium / Thousand-Year Reign	No settled single-word equivalent; “min il” is descriptive, not a technical term	Min il (descriptive phrase, not coined noun)	Avoid inventing a loanword-neologism that would falsely suggest interpretive settledness on a debated doctrine
Great White Throne (as a technical judgment-scene name)	No equivalent named scene in Azerbaijani religious vocabulary; “Qiyamət” names a different event-structure	Böyük ağ taxt (literal compound)	Naming it literally, rather than borrowing Qiyamət, prevents doctrinal conflation while remaining visually vivid
Sealing vs. Mark (paired counter-images)	Azerbaijani has words for “seal” (möhür) and “mark/brand” (damğa) individually, but no existing paired technical vocabulary contrasting protective divine sealing against a hostile counterfeit mark	Möhür (sealing of the redeemed) vs. Damğa (mark of the beast) — deliberately different roots	Lexical distance between the two Azerbaijani words must be preserved so the visual/theological contrast is not blurred by using near-synonyms
Purchased/Redeemed by Blood (universal-scope atonement, 5:9)	No prior Revelation-specific atonement term existed in the baseline Romans package (Romans uses justification/imputed righteousness vocabulary, not this purchase-image)	Qanla satın alınmış (literal compound)	New atonement image requiring its own entry, distinct from but coordinated with baseline salvation vocabulary
”It Is Done” (Γέγονεν) as a settled-fact declaration	No idiomatic Azerbaijani exclamation carries the identical perfect-tense theological weight	Tamamlandı! / Bu, olub qurtardı!	Constructed to preserve completed-action force; avoid a future-oriented gloss
Dwelling of God / tabernacling presence (σκηνόω)	Azerbaijani religious vocabulary has no settled term for a permanent, personal divine indwelling-with-humanity image (as opposed to general “closeness to God” devotional language)	Allahın məskəni / məskən salmaq	Constructed compound anchored to the baseline Incarnation doctrine rather than vague devotional-proximity language

General observation: Azerbaijani is not lexically impoverished for Revelation’s narrative vocabulary (thrones, scrolls, trumpets, bowls, elders — all have serviceable plain words). The true gaps cluster almost entirely around eschatological end-state technical terms that have no Islamic doctrinal counterpart at all (second death, millennium-as-a-named-era, great white throne as a named scene). These are gaps of category, not merely of word, and each requires a first-use teaching note, not just a glossary entry.

---

Section C — Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods Requiring Fencing

Unlike Section B’s empty neighborhoods, these are overcrowded neighborhoods: existing Azerbaijani words that are readily available, natural-sounding, and therefore tempting to use — but which sit inside a religious-semantic field dominated by Shia Twelver Islam or Azerbaijani folk religion, requiring active linguistic “fencing” to prevent unwanted doctrinal migration.

Azerbaijani Word/Field	Competing Occupant	Fencing Strategy
Şəhid (martyr)	Karbala/Imam Hussein martyrdom-intercession devotion, Ashura mourning ritual — the single most emotionally saturated word-field in Azerbaijani religious culture	NEVER use for μάρτυς/μαρτυρία. Use Şahid/Şahidlik exclusively, with a standing teaching footnote at every occurrence (1:5,9; 2:13; 6:9; 11:3-13; 12:11,17; 17:6; 19:10; 20:4) distinguishing testimony-to-Christ’s-finished-work from redemptive-intercessory martyrdom merit
Səbir (patient endurance)	Core Islamic virtue-term, closely tied to fatalistic submission to Allah’s decree (qismət-adjacent)	NEVER use for ὑπομονή. Use Dözüm exclusively; teach as confident, hope-fueled perseverance grounded in assured future vindication, not passive resignation
Tövbə (repentance)	Central Islamic devotional practice of ritual return-to-Allah, often paired with compensatory good deeds	Permit tövbə etmək for μετανοέω (no better alternative exists) but require every occurrence (2:5,16,21-22; 3:3,19; 9:20-21; 16:9,11) to carry a teaching note: restoration within a grace relationship already secured, not merit-restoring ritual
Cənnət (paradise)	Qur’anic garden-reward imagery attained through combined faith-and-deeds assessment at Judgment	Retain cənnət (no viable substitute) but pair every occurrence (2:7; 22:2,14) with an explicit basis-of-entry note: the Lamb’s finished work alone
Nur (light)	Shia devotional “Light of the Imams”/Nur-i Məhəmmədi pre-existence tradition (already fenced in baseline for δόξα)	Continue baseline fence: never render δόξα as nur; use Ehtişam consistently, including for the New Jerusalem’s light imagery (21:23-24; 22:5)
Taxt (throne)	Historical Azerbaijani/regional khanate and Safavid-Qajar court imagery; also risk of merely secular monarchy association given Soviet-era desacralized political vocabulary	Always pair taxt with Allah or Quzu as grammatical/textual co-referent; never let “taxt” stand alone as an unqualified noun in a doctrinally load-bearing sentence
Əjdaha (dragon)	Turkic/Azerbaijani folklore dragon-figures are not uniformly evil (some folk traditions treat əjdaha ambivalently or even as a guardian-figure)	Every occurrence (12:3-17; 20:2) must carry the text’s own explicit identification “bu əjdaha Şeytandır” (this dragon is Satan) attached, not left as a free-floating symbol
Peyğəmbər / Yalançı peyğəmbər (prophet / false prophet)	Peyğəmbər is an exclusive, sacred, closed Islamic category culminating in Muhammad as the final prophet (khatm an-nabiyyin)	Bound “yalançı peyğəmbər” narrowly and explicitly to Revelation’s specific end-times deceiver figure (13:11; 16:13; 19:20; 20:10) every time it occurs; never let it read as a claim about the category of prophethood generally
Fahişə (prostitute, of Babylon)	Strong moral/cultural sensitivity in Azerbaijani register around this word in ordinary usage	State the symbolic (idolatrous political-religious system), non-literal sense immediately and every time (17:1-5,15-16; 19:2) before any other exposition
Mərsiyə (Karbala lament genre)	Reserved, sacred Shia devotional lament-poetry genre for Imam Hussein’s martyrdom, central to Muharram mourning	FORBIDDEN as a rendering for θρῆνος (Babylon’s merchants’ lament, ch. 18). Use the more generic Ağı; using mərsiyə here would either trivialize a sacred genre or wrongly dignify Babylon’s judgment with Karbala’s emotional register
Şəfaət / Təvəssül (intercession via saint/Imam)	Central, emotionally powerful Shia devotional practice (already forbidden in baseline for Romans 8:34)	Reconfirm forbidden status for Revelation 8:3-4’s incense-prayer imagery; teach the passage as showing ordinary believers’ prayers reaching God directly, with no mediating priestly-intercessor class, as a deliberate counterpoint
Dajjal-adjacent folk eschatology (no single AZ word, but a narrative-field)	Popular Azerbaijani Shia end-times speculation around a Deceiver figure, his mark/sign, and Mahdi-return sequence	Every occurrence of Vəhşi heyvan, Damğa, and 666 (chs. 11, 13, 16, 19-20) requires an explicit teaching note distinguishing Revelation’s beast (defeated by Christ’s own return) from the Dajjal narrative (resolved by the Mahdi), to prevent silent narrative substitution
Qiyamət (Day of Judgment/Resurrection)	Familiar, vivid Islamic Judgment-Day scene, structurally similar in visual weight to the Great White Throne and lake-of-fire scenes	Use only as an explicitly named comparison point in teaching notes (never as a translation term itself) to leverage genuine visual resonance while redirecting the deciding mechanism to the Book of Life/union-with-the-Lamb

---

Section D — Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decision Log

Term	Decision	Rationale
Ἁρμαγεδών (Armageddon)	Transliterate: Har-Magedon	Proper place-name with no meaningful semantic content to paraphrase; transliteration also avoids inventing a false etymological gloss that could fuel geopolitical over-identification
Ἄλφα καὶ τὸ Ὦ (Alpha and Omega)	Transliterate + gloss: Əlfa və Omeqa (Əvvəl və Axır)	Letters have no Azerbaijani equivalent; the parenthetical gloss (First and Last) carries the actual doctrinal content and must always accompany the transliteration on first use per lesson
χξϛ / 666	Numeral, not word: Altı yüz altmış altı (666)	Retain Arabic numeral form alongside the spelled-out Azerbaijani number per established Bible-citation convention (see baseline verse-numbering rule); do not attempt symbolic-letter transliteration from Greek gematria, which would be meaningless to readers
Βαβυλὼν (Babylon)	Transliterate proper name: Babil (established), qualified as Böyük Babil	Established Azerbaijani Bible/Qur’anic proper-name form already exists; paraphrasing would obscure the deliberate historical-symbolic double reference (literal ancient city vs. symbolic end-times power)
Ἅδης (Hades)	Paraphrase, not transliterate: Ölülər diyarı	Transliterating “Hades” would import unfamiliar Greek-mythology associations with no biblical-translation precedent in Azerbaijani; “Ölülər diyarı” (realm of the dead) is the natural OT-Sheol-equivalent paraphrase already serviceable in Azerbaijani biblical idiom
Ἁρμαγεδών-adjacent: γάμος τοῦ ἀρνίου (Marriage of the Lamb)	Paraphrase: Quzunun toyu	A descriptive event-name, not a proper noun; paraphrase preserves comprehensibility and ties directly to the “Gəlin” (Bride) term already established
Ἄβυσσος (Abyss)	Paraphrase: Dibsiz quyu	Descriptive compound (“bottomless pit”) is more transparent to readers than a transliterated “Abissos,” which would carry no inherited meaning
ναρδίον/Νικολαΐτης (Nicolaitans), Βαλαάμ (Balaam), Ἰεζάβελ (Jezebel) — proper names in the letters to the churches (ch. 2)	Transliterate: Nikolaitlər, Bilam (established OT form), İzevel (established OT form)	Standard proper-name handling; reuse established Azerbaijani Bible OT forms where they already exist (Bilam per Numbers 22, İzevel per 1 Kings) rather than inventing new transliterations
Ἀββά (Abba, Romans 8:15)	Precedent already set in baseline; not recurring in Revelation	No new decision needed; noted here only to confirm the transliteration-retention precedent is available if any future lesson material cross-references it
Ἁλληλουϊά (Hallelujah, 19:1,3,4,6)	Transliterate (established): Halleluya	Reuse baseline’s established transliterated form; do not paraphrase as “Allaha həmd olsun” in the text itself, though such a gloss may appear in teaching notes
Ἀμήν (Amen)	Transliterate (established): Amin	Reuse baseline’s established transliterated form throughout doxologies (1:6-7; 5:14; 7:12; 19:4; 22:20-21)
Ἰερουσαλὴμ καινή (New Jerusalem)	Paraphrase compound + established proper name: Yeni Yerusəlim	”Yerusəlim” is the established transliterated proper name; “Yeni” (new) is a plain paraphrase-qualifier, not itself transliterated — the combination keeps the proper-name recognizability while flagging its distinctness from the modern geopolitical city

General principle applied: Transliterate proper nouns and letter-names with no semantic content (Har-Magedon, Babil, Əlfa/Omeqa, personal names); paraphrase descriptive theological images and place-descriptions even when a transliterated Greek/Hebrew loanword might exist in scholarly usage (Hades, Abyss), since the target audience’s Bible-literacy level (per the baseline’s reading-level target: general adult newspaper-feature literacy) cannot be assumed to carry inherited meaning for untransliterated technical Greek vocabulary.

---

Section E — Ranked List of Highest-Risk Ambiguities

Ranked by combined severity (doctrinal centrality × likelihood of syncretistic misreading), drawing on Sections A–D above.

1. Witness/Martyr (μάρτυς) vs. şəhid — Critical. The single highest-friction term-cluster in the curriculum (1:5,9; 2:13; 6:9; 11:3-13; 12:11,17; 17:6; 19:10; 20:4). Risk: readers instinctively map testimony-unto-death onto Karbala/Ashura martyrdom-intercession theology, importing merit-earning suffering into a doctrine that grounds all vindication in Christ’s own finished work.

2. Worship of the Lamb / səcdə (5:8-14; 7:9-11) — Critical. Extending the exclusively-Allah-reserved prostration posture to a sacrificial-animal image is the text’s sharpest direct collision with tawhid’s worship-exclusivity; any softening (e.g., rendering as mere “honor” rather than worship) would erase the doctrine Revelation itself insists on.

3. Sonship/Alpha-Omega/Word-of-God deity-of-Christ cluster (1:8, 17-18; 19:13; 21:6; 22:13) — Critical. These titles, shared identically between Father and Son, constitute the book’s most concentrated deity-of-Christ claim; any rendering implying Christ merely received or borrowed the title (rather than possessing it eternally) collapses the doctrine.

4. Beast / Mark / 666 vs. Dajjal narrative (chs. 11, 13, 16, 19-20) — Critical. Strong pre-existing folk-eschatological narrative structure (Deceiver, his mark, Mahdi’s victorious return) risks silently substituting itself for Revelation’s actual sequence (the beast defeated by Christ’s own return), especially in oral teaching contexts where the narrative parallel is more memorable than the term itself.

5. Lake of Fire / Second Death vs. Cəhənnəm (19:20; 20:10,14-15; 21:8) — Critical. Cəhənnəm’s independent doctrinal architecture (levels, sin-specific punishments, intercession-reducible sentences) is different enough from Revelation’s lake-of-fire imagery that even careful glossing risks readers importing an entirely different judgment mechanism wholesale.

6. Great White Throne vs. Qiyamət scene (20:11-15) — Critical. Genuine visual/structural overlap with the Islamic Judgment-Day scene is a double-edged resource: useful as a bridge point, but dangerous if the deciding mechanism (Book of Life / union with the Lamb) is not foregrounded loudly enough to displace the culturally default deeds-scales expectation.

7. “Righteous deeds of the saints” (τὰ δικαιώματα τῶν ἁγίων, 19:8) — Critical. The one place in the whole two-curriculum span (Romans + Revelation) where “saleh əməllər” is the correct rendering; the surrounding risk is that this single verse gets extracted and used to reintroduce a deeds-ledger reading into the otherwise carefully guarded Salehlik/Saleh sayılma doctrine.

8. Coming Soon (ἔρχομαι ταχύ) vs. awaited-Mahdi framing (22:7,12,20) — Critical. The imminence-of-a-hidden-returning-figure structure closely parallels Mahdi eschatology; without explicit redirection, readers may mentally substitute a distinct awaited intermediary for Christ himself.

9. New Heaven and New Earth: renewal vs. replacement (21:1) — High. The Islamic Qiyamət tradition of destroying and replacing the present world with a disconnected paradise runs directly against Revelation’s continuity/renewal emphasis (creation groaning toward restoration, not annihilation); this shapes how the entire core passage (21:1-8) is heard.

10. Bride of Christ / Marriage of the Lamb (19:7-9; 21:2,9; 22:17) — High. No natural Islamic devotional register exists for nuptial language applied to the divine-human relationship; without deliberate corporate-covenantal framing up front, the metaphor risks landing as merely strange rather than intimate, undermining the doctrine’s emotional force.

11. Dwelling of God / tabernacling presence vs. vague devotional “closeness” (21:3,22) — High. Risk of softening a bold Incarnation-adjacent permanence-of-presence claim into generic Sufi-adjacent devotional nearness-to-God language, losing the doctrine’s specific, bodily-adjacent, tabernacle-fulfillment content.

12. Patient Endurance (ὑπομονή) vs. səbir (throughout, esp. 1:9; 2:2-3,19; 3:10; 13:10; 14:12) — High. Even with dözüm established as the fenced term, informal register slippage toward səbir in teaching or oral paraphrase is a live risk given səbir’s much higher frequency in everyday Azerbaijani religious speech.

13. Repent (μετανοέω) vs. ritual tövbə (chs. 2-3, 9, 16) — High. Because tövbə is retained (no better option exists), the risk is not lexical substitution but doctrinal drift: without the recurring teaching-note discipline, readers may quietly re-import a merit-restoring works framework into a call addressed to churches already secured by grace.

14. Vəhy (Revelation as book-title/genre, ch. 1 and throughout) vs. Islamic wahy — Medium-High. Because lay engagement with primary religious texts in Azerbaijani Shia practice is often clergy-mediated rather than direct, this collision is somewhat diffused in practice (per baseline’s Inspiration of Scripture note) but not eliminated, especially for more text-literate or diaspora-influenced readers.

15. Elders/Living Creatures/Throne cluster (chs. 4-5) as merely decorative apocalyptic furniture — Medium. Lower doctrinal stakes than items 1-14, but a real risk that readers treat the entire throne-room vision as ornamental symbolism disconnected from the Sovereignty-over-History doctrine it exists to establish, given the Symbolic and Apocalyptic Interpretation doctrine’s general vulnerability to over-literalization or under-attention.

---

Governance Notes

1. All Section B constructed compounds and Section C fenced terms must be entered into translation_memory.json with version increment before Phase 2 segment translation begins (per the AI Translation Requirements pre-flight checklist).
2. The ranked ambiguity list (Section E) should drive Phase 2 review-routing priority within each risk tier: items 1–8 warrant concentrated theologian attention even beyond the standard Critical-tier routing, given their compounding cultural-collision severity.
3. This analysis assumes and does not repeat the baseline Romans forbidden-substitution list (şəriət, qismət/alın yazısı, şəfaət/təvəssül, Cəbrail); all baseline forbidden substitutions remain in force throughout Revelation.
4. See 08_core_glossary.md for the full term-by-term glossary this analysis supports, and bible_term_registry.json for the formal per-term doctrinal risk entries.

End of Linguistic Gap Analysis.