Linguistic Gap Analysis
Linguistic Gap Analysis — 1 John (English ⇄ Czech)
Purpose
This analysis identifies where Czech destination-language resources are absent (missing vocabulary — a genuine conceptual void requiring construction from scratch) versus contested (crowded semantic neighborhoods — a real word exists but a stronger, competing secular sense will dominate a reader’s first impression, requiring active fencing). It also resolves transliteration-versus-paraphrase decisions for terms new to this curriculum and ranks the letter’s highest-risk ambiguities for Phase 2 prioritization.
This document extends, and nowhere contradicts, the baseline Romans Language Package. All baseline term renderings (Bůh, Ježíš, Syn Boží, Otec, Duch svatý, víra/věřit, hřích, spravedlnost/spravedlivý, společenství, vtělení, zákon, prorok, přijetí za syna, Kristus/Mesiáš) are reused exactly, per the hard rule governing this pipeline. This letter’s dominant risk pattern differs meaningfully from Romans, however: while Romans’ central problem is a conceptual void (no framework at all), 1 John introduces several genuine secular-culture collision risks not present, or not as sharply present, in the Romans package (antikrist/horror-film; idol/celebrity; duch/ghost-folklore; hřích k smrti/Catholic mortal-sin taxonomy). Both patterns are tracked below.
Full-Book Coverage Confirmation (1 John 1–5)
Per the PRD Phase 1 full-coverage mandate, every chapter of 1 John was reviewed for load-bearing vocabulary, not only the core passage (4:7-21). No chapter is silently omitted.
| Chapter | Reviewed | Load-bearing contribution |
|---|---|---|
| 1 John 1 | ✅ Reviewed | Word of life (Logos background), fellowship (vertical + horizontal), God is light, walk (conduct-of-life idiom risk), sin (false claim to sinlessness), confess, cleanse, blood, forgive |
| 1 John 2 | ✅ Reviewed | Advocate/paraklētos, propitiation, righteous/righteousness (of Christ), commandment (old vs. new), world (first negative-sense occurrences), lust/desire, flesh (negative sense), last hour, antichrist (first occurrences), liar, abide (refrain begins), anointing |
| 1 John 3 | ✅ Reviewed | Children of God, born of God (refrain continues), lawlessness, devil vs. folk-devil, murderer, lay down life, compassion, brother, abide (continues), confidence/parrēsia (first occurrence, 3:21), Holy Spirit (3:24) |
| 1 John 4 | ✅ Reviewed — core passage | Love / God is love (thesis), spirit / test the spirits, false prophet, error, world (negative value-system sense), overcome (first occurrence), incarnation-confession formula, advocate/Holy Spirit distinction reinforced, confidence/parrēsia (4:17), fear, perfected love, Savior, testify |
| 1 John 5 | ✅ Reviewed | Faith/believe (concentrated), overcome (concentrated), water and blood, testify/testimony (concentrated, legal witness structure), eternal life (letter’s stated purpose, 5:13), sin unto death, evil one, idols vs. modly, true God, know/assurance (concentrated “we know” refrain) |
No chapter in 1 John is doctrine-neutral; every chapter contributes at minimum one Critical- or High-risk term. This is itself a notable feature of this letter relative to Romans, where some chapters (e.g., Romans 13’s civil-government material) are comparatively low-density.
Part 1: Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix
| Doctrine | Available Czech Term(s) | Weaknesses | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| God is Light and God is Love | Bůh je světlo; Bůh je láska; světlo; temnota; láska | ”Světlo” has no independent moral-metaphorical resonance in ordinary secular Czech (a light bulb, daylight); “láska” is saturated with romantic-sentimental pop-culture usage (song lyrics, advertising) and risks being flattened into greeting-card sentiment. Both are copulative identity-predications (God = X), a grammatical form Czech supports but a secular reader may not register as ontological claim rather than description of mood/activity. | Teach both identity-statements explicitly as claims about God’s essential nature, not occasional behavior. Pair “Bůh je láska” every time with the letter’s own historical definition of that love (4:9-10, sending the Son) to prevent drift into vague sentiment. Pair “Bůh je světlo” with its stated negative corollary (“no darkness at all in him,” 1:5) to establish the moral-purity sense against the purely physical default. |
| Fellowship with God and One Another | společenství | Lexically Low risk (stable, recognized modern word), but 1 John’s specific doctrinal claim — that fellowship with God and fellowship with fellow believers are a single, inseparable reality (1:3, 6-7) — is new teaching weight on an otherwise comfortable word, easily read as merely “community” in the generic civic sense. | Explicitly teach the bidirectional, inseparable structure of the term in this letter (vertical + horizontal), rather than relying on the word alone to convey that logical link. |
| Confession and Forgiveness of Sin | vyznat/vyznávat; odpustit; očistit; hřích; oběť smíření | ”Vyznat se v něčem” is a live colloquial idiom meaning “to know one’s way around a subject,” risking the confessional/allegiance-declaring force collapsing into casual competence. “Hřích” carries the baseline’s noted idiomatic flattening (“what a shame”) plus 1 John’s own new pastoral problem — the false claim to sinlessness (1:8, 10). “Oběť smíření” has essentially zero pre-existing secular content to redirect from, positive or negative. | Teach “vyznávat” as public, allegiance-declaring admission before God, explicitly distinct from the “znát se v něčem” competence idiom. Teach the false-sinlessness-claim error as its own distinct pastoral problem, separate from mere idiomatic flattening. Build “oběť smíření” from the ground up using Old Testament sacrificial background, exactly as the baseline built “přičtená spravedlnost.” |
| Love for the Brethren as Evidence of New Birth | láska; bratr; narodit se z Boha; děti Boží | ”Bratr” defaults to literal biological sibling for a secular reader with no automatic extension to “fellow believer.” “Narodit se z Boha” has zero ordinary secular usage. Genuine risk of merging this Johannine organic-birth metaphor with the baseline’s distinct Pauline forensic-adoption metaphor (“přijetí za syna”). | Teach “bratr” ‘s extended ecclesial sense explicitly on first use. Enforce a single, unvarying Czech rendering of “narodit se z Boha” at every one of its roughly ten occurrences (2:29; 3:9; 4:7; 5:1, 4, 18), matching the baseline’s Romans 1:16-17/8:28/10:9-10 consistency mandate. Explicitly teach the birth-metaphor/adoption-metaphor distinction as two related but non-identical biblical images, never collapsing one into the other. |
| The Incarnation and Antichrist | vtělení; antikrist; tělo | ”Vtělení” itself carries the baseline’s low-recognition risk (teach, don’t just translate). “Antikrist” collides with a specific, internationally circulated 2009 arthouse horror film widely discussed in Czech film culture, risking horror/occult associations overriding the letter’s comparatively mundane doctrinal definition. “Tělo” performs genuine double duty within the same letter (positive incarnational sense at 4:2; negative moral-critique sense at 2:16) with no independent moral charge to disambiguate the two on its own. | Present 1 John 4:2’s confession-formula as the letter’s own doctrinal test for vtělení, reinforcing the baseline entry rather than introducing an unrelated concept. Define “antikrist” strictly and immediately from 2:22’s textual definition on first use, specifically to override the film-title association. Flag which sense of “tělo” governs at each occurrence rather than allowing the single word to silently carry both senses. |
| Assurance of Salvation and Eternal Life | věčný život; Spasitel; důvěra; znát/vědět | ”Věčný život” shares the baseline’s “spasení” archaic-registration risk, compounded by a distinct secular-era misreading (medical life-extension, sci-fi immortality) rather than covenantal relational life. “Důvěra” is a comfortable, low-charge secular word (trust in a friend) that under-conveys the forensic setting of confident standing before a Judge. “Znát/vědět” risk being hedged into tentative Czech phrasing (“myslím, že…”), undercutting the letter’s repeated, settled “we know” refrain. | Pair “věčný život” every occurrence with narrative/relational content (5:11-13), never as a bare label. Build “důvěra” up as forensic confidence before God as Judge (4:17), not generic positive feeling. Preserve the assured, unhedged register of “víme” throughout 5:13, 18-20 without softening. |
| Overcoming the World | svět; přemoci/zvítězit | ”Svět” collapses three genuinely distinct senses (neutral creation, humanity as object of God’s love, God-opposing value-system) into one neutral word, with the negative value-system sense — central to this doctrine — entirely absent from ordinary usage. “Zvítězit” carries strong secular competitive-achievement connotations (a sports match, a competition), risking a self-help “win through effort” misreading. | Flag which of the three senses of “svět” governs at each occurrence (2:15-17; 3:13; 4:1-5, 9, 14, 17; 5:19), never assuming the negative sense is automatically inferred. Ground “přemoci/zvítězit” explicitly in God’s indwelling presence (4:4), not human willpower or effort. |
| Testing the Spirits | duch; zkoušet/rozlišovat; falešný prorok; pomazání | ”Duch” covers the Holy Spirit, human disposition, AND — significantly for secular Czech popular culture — folkloric ghosts (“duch zámku”; haunted-castle tourism and ghost-story culture are a genuinely live category). “Zkoušet”/“rozlišovat” combined with “duchy” risks drifting toward ghost-investigation/entertainment framing rather than sober doctrinal discernment. “Pomazání” has near-zero active secular use and no OT background to draw on. | Explicitly establish the referent of “duch” at every occurrence in 4:1-6 (the source/content behind a teacher’s message, tested by confession of Christ), never left ambiguous. Reframe “testing the spirits” around doctrinal content (what is confessed about Jesus Christ, 4:2-3), explicitly not phenomena or unusual experiences. Build “pomazání” ‘s OT royal/priestly background from scratch. |
Part 2: Missing Vocabulary vs. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods
2.1 Missing Vocabulary — Genuine Conceptual Voids (build from scratch; low collision risk, high comprehension-gap risk)
These terms have stable, well-formed Czech renderings but essentially zero pre-existing secular content to draw on, positive or negative. The risk is that the correct word communicates nothing at all, not that it communicates the wrong thing.
| Term | Czech Rendering | Gap Description | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| propitiation | oběť smíření | No everyday Czech usage whatsoever; unlike “milost” or “spasení,” there is no secular meaning to redirect from. | Construct fully from OT sacrificial background at every occurrence (2:2; 4:10), exactly paralleling baseline treatment of “přičtená spravedlnost.” |
| born of God | narodit se z Boha / je zrozen z Boha | No ordinary secular usage; the concept of a supernatural, morally-evidenced new birth is wholly unfamiliar. | Introduce as new theological content on first occurrence (2:29); enforce identical phrasing at every subsequent occurrence as a rhetorical refrain. |
| anointing | pomazání | Real word, near-zero active use, no independent cultural resonance (unlike “svatý,” which retains name-day traction). | Build entire OT royal/priestly anointing background from scratch before applying to the Spirit’s teaching ministry (2:20, 27). |
| lawlessness | nezákonnost / bezzákonnost | Abstract, clinical-sounding legal coinage with weak independent traction. | Pair every occurrence with a concrete gloss (“odmítnutí Božího řádu,” rejection of God’s order), not left as a bare abstract noun (3:4). |
| word of life | slovo života | Reads as a vague inspirational phrase without John 1:1’s Logos-Christology background, which cannot be assumed. | Supply brief Logos/“Slovo” background on first use (1:1) before the phrase can carry its intended christological weight. |
| advocate (legal-defense sense) | přímluvce | Builds on baseline “přímluva” root, but the specific courtroom-defense-counsel nuance (pleading a case before a judge, not merely praying) is unfamiliar. | Teach the forensic-legal picture explicitly (2:1); keep lexically distinct from the Holy Spirit’s separate Advocate role to avoid conflating two Persons’ functions. |
2.2 Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods — Competing Secular Senses (fence explicitly; high collision risk)
These terms have an available Czech word, but that word’s dominant everyday meaning is a strong, active competitor that a secular reader will reach for by default. Fencing means an explicit, repeated act of ruling the wrong sense out, not merely defining the right one.
| Term | Czech Rendering | Competing Secular Sense | Fencing Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| love | láska | Romantic-sentimental pop-culture love (song lyrics, “all you need is love,” advertising) | Actively and repeatedly distinguish from romantic love throughout 4:7-21, not once at first use; anchor every reference to the letter’s concrete definition (self-giving, historically demonstrated at 4:9-10). |
| spirit | duch | (a) generic human disposition/attitude, (b) folkloric ghosts (“duch zámku,” a live Czech ghost-story/haunted-castle-tourism category) | Explicitly state the referent (content of a teacher’s message about Christ) at every one of the six occurrences in 4:1-6; never leave “duch” unqualified in this passage. |
| antichrist | antikrist | The 2009 Lars von Trier horror film widely discussed in Czech film/arts culture | Define immediately and exclusively from the text’s own definition (2:22) on first use, specifically to override the film association. |
| idols | modly (NOT idoly) | The loanword “idol,” in active colloquial use for a celebrity/pop star/talent-show figure (“je to můj idol”) | Mandatory: never render as “idoly.” Use only the traditional Bible-vocabulary “modly.” Flag any translation candidate using “idoly” for immediate rejection. |
| sin unto death | hřích k smrti | The inherited (if secularized) Roman Catholic mortal-sin/venial-sin taxonomy (“smrtelný hřích” vs. “všední hřích”) | Explicitly clarify this is NOT a reference to the Catholic mortal/venial distinction, but a specific, debated Johannine category (5:16-17), likely decisive final rejection of Christ. |
| world | svět | Only the neutral senses (the planet, everyone) are active in ordinary usage; the negative value-system sense is simply absent | Flag the governing sense per occurrence; explicitly supply the negative sense where operative (2:15-17; 5:19), since Czech offers no separate lexical item to disambiguate automatically. |
| overcome | přemoci / zvítězit | Secular competitive-achievement victory (sports, competitions) | Explicitly ground in God’s indwelling presence (4:4) as the stated basis for confidence, not effort or willpower. |
| confess | vyznat / vyznávat | Colloquial idiom “vyznat se v něčem” = to know one’s way around a subject | Teach as public, allegiance-declaring admission/acknowledgment, explicitly distinct from casual competence, on first substantive use (1:9; 4:2-3, 15). |
| walk (=conduct of life) | chodit | Colloquial idiom “chodit s někým” = to date someone; also literal walking | Supply a brief explanatory gloss on first use (1:6-7) establishing the metaphorical “conduct of life” sense before the idiom risk can intrude. |
| abide/remain | zůstávat | Purely spatial/literal in ordinary speech (“zůstat doma”) | Unpack the relational, mutual-indwelling sense explicitly on first substantive use; enforce identical rendering across all ~20 occurrences as a structural refrain. |
| confidence/boldness | důvěra | Comfortable, low-charge everyday trust (in a friend, in a plan) | Build up the specific forensic content (confident standing before the Judge, 4:17) explicitly; do not leave as generic positive feeling. |
| perfected love | dokonalá láska / naplněná láska | ”Dokonalý” carries a strong “flawless” everyday connotation (a perfect score) | Gloss on first use (4:12, 17-18) as “reaching its intended goal,” explicitly distinguishing from moral-perfectionist misreading. |
| commandment | přikázání | ”Desatero přikázání” (the Ten Commandments) is a genuine cultural touchpoint even for secular Czechs | Make explicit that this refers to the NEW love-commandment (2:7-8; 3:23; 4:21), not the Mosaic Decalogue, to prevent a false assumed reference. |
| flesh (positive sense) | tělo | Neutral physical-body sense under-conveys both the negative moral-critique sense (2:16) and risks the positive incarnational sense (4:2) being read as merely “body” without doctrinal weight | Flag the governing sense (positive/incarnational vs. negative/moral) explicitly at each occurrence; never let the negative sense silently absorb the doctrinally essential positive one. |
Part 3: Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions
| Term | Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Χριστός / Mesiáš | Transliterate — retain established “Kristus / Mesiáš” | Baseline term; established Bible-translation tradition; 1 John’s confessional formula (2:22; 5:1) functions identically to baseline’s Messianic Promise doctrine. |
| ἀντίχριστος | Transliterate — “antikrist,” WITH mandatory doctrinal gloss on first use | The Greek-derived transliteration is already the fixed Czech Bible-tradition term; paraphrasing it (e.g., “popírač Krista,” “denier of Christ”) would break consistency with established Czech Bible translations and cross-reference navigability. Given the film-title collision, transliteration must be paired with an explicit definitional gloss (2:22) rather than replaced with a paraphrase. |
| Ἀββά | Retain untranslated, paired with “Otče” | Not a new decision for this curriculum — matches baseline’s existing Romans 8:15 treatment exactly; 1 John does not use the term, but the AI Translation Requirements update should note the baseline rule remains in force for cross-document consistency. |
| ἱλασμός (propitiation) | Paraphrase — “oběť smíření” (lit. “sacrifice of reconciliation/atonement”), NOT a single-word transliteration or coinage | No single Czech word carries this concept; the established ČEP compound phrase is the correct target, matching the treatment the baseline gives “přičtená spravedlnost” (a compound phrase, not a one-word coinage). |
| παράκλητος (advocate) | Paraphrase using existing Czech root — “přímluvce,” NOT a transliteration (“parakletos”) | Czech already has a serviceable root (“přímluva,” intercession) from the baseline; introducing a Greek transliteration would create an unnecessary and unhelpfully technical-sounding new term where a comprehensible native compound exists. |
| γεννάω passive (born of God) | Paraphrase — full clause “narodit se z Boha / je zrozen z Boha,” NOT a single compact noun-coinage | The concept requires the full relational clause to communicate at all; a single invented noun would obscure rather than clarify, and the letter’s rhetorical refrain effect depends on repeating a recognizable clause, not a technical label. |
| κόσμος (world, negative sense) | No transliteration; no separate coinage — retain ordinary “svět” for all three senses | Introducing an invented technical term for the negative sense (e.g., “světský systém”) would depart from established Czech Bible-translation convention and reduce cross-reference consistency with other biblical books; disambiguation must be handled through explicit per-occurrence flagging in teaching material, not through a new lexical item. |
| εἴδωλα (idols) | Reject the available loanword; use the established Bible term instead — “modly,” explicitly NOT “idoly” | This is a rare case where the “obvious” cognate choice (a real, current Czech word) must be actively rejected in favor of the older, less immediately recognizable but doctrinally safe established rendering, precisely because the cognate has drifted to an incompatible secular meaning (celebrity). |
| ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον (sin unto death) | Paraphrase, not equated with any single existing Czech theological category — “hřích k smrti,” WITH mandatory clarifying note | Must NOT be rendered or footnoted in a way that imports the Catholic “smrtelný hřích” category; the phrase should be presented as a distinct, debated Johannine category on its own terms. |
| πνεῦμα (spirit, generic) | No transliteration; retain “duch,” with mandatory referent-specification | A transliteration is neither available nor helpful; the correct decision is not lexical substitution but discourse-level disambiguation (explicitly stating the referent) at every occurrence in 4:1-6. |
General transliteration policy for this curriculum: transliterate only where (a) an established Czech Bible-translation tradition already does so (Kristus/Mesiáš, Abba, Amen, Haleluja — per baseline) and (b) the concept is a proper name or formal title rather than a descriptive concept. Descriptive theological concepts (propitiation, advocacy, new birth, world-as-value-system) are paraphrased using existing Czech roots and compound constructions, never rendered as fresh Greek-derived coinages, to preserve readability for a low-biblical-literacy general audience per the baseline’s reading-level target.
Part 4: Ranked List of Highest-Risk Ambiguities in 1 John
Ranked by combined severity of (1) doctrinal centrality, (2) strength of the competing secular/cultural association, and (3) breadth of occurrence across the letter. All items ranked Critical or High require human theologian review per the baseline’s risk-tier routing.
- duch (πνεῦμα) in 1 John 4:1-6 — Six occurrences in six verses of the single most severe context-sensitivity problem in the letter: the same word must cover the Holy Spirit, a human disposition, and risks drifting toward Czech folkloric ghost-culture (“duch zámku”), directly undermining “Testing the Spirits.” Critical.
- láska / Bůh je láska (4:7-21, throughout) — The letter’s thesis term and thesis doctrine, competing against the single most saturated romantic-sentimental word in the Czech language, with no lexical alternative available at all. Critical.
- antikrist (2:18, 22; 4:3) — A specific, named, currently active pop-culture collision (a well-known horror film) unusual for this Language Package’s normal “no competing framework” risk pattern; a wrong first impression here actively displaces the correct doctrinal content rather than merely leaving a void. Critical.
- idoly vs. modly (5:21) — The letter’s climactic closing sentence is at direct risk of a trivializing misreading (celebrity worship rather than exclusivity of worship) if the wrong Czech word is chosen; this is a single binary lexical decision with outsized consequence for the letter’s final rhetorical force. High/Critical.
- hřích k smrti (5:16-17) — The one genuine instance in this Language Package of an inherited (if secularized) competing religious-institutional framework (Catholic mortal/venial sin taxonomy) actively substituting for 1 John’s own distinct, debated category. High.
- svět / κόσμος (2:15-17; 3:1, 13; 4:1-5, 9, 14, 17; 5:19) — High-frequency term whose negative, doctrine-critical sense (“Overcoming the World”) is entirely absent from the word’s ordinary Czech meaning, with no compensating lexical marker available. High.
- Bůh je světlo / světlo (1:5, 7; 2:8-10) — An identity-predication resting on a word with almost no independent moral-metaphorical resonance in secular Czech, at risk of registering as mere physical brightness. Critical.
- narodit se z Boha (2:29; 3:9; 4:7; 5:1, 4, 18) — Not a collision risk but a severe consistency risk: the letter’s rhetorical argument depends on this exact refrain recurring identically roughly ten times; any lexical drift across occurrences (or across Phase 2 documents) breaks the doctrinal argument itself. Critical.
- věčný život (1:2; 2:25; 3:15; 5:11-13, 20) — Shares the baseline’s archaic-registration risk for “spasení,” compounded by a distinctly contemporary secular misreading (medical life-extension/sci-fi immortality) not present in the baseline’s original analysis. Critical.
- vyznat / vyznávat (1:9; 4:2-3, 15) — A live colloquial idiom (“vyznat se v něčem” = know one’s way around) risks flattening the confessional, allegiance-declaring force into casual familiarity at exactly the passages carrying the letter’s doctrinal test-formulas. High.
- zvítězit / přemoci (2:13-14; 4:4; 5:4-5) — Strong secular competitive-achievement connotation risks a self-help “win through effort” misreading precisely where the text grounds victory in God’s indwelling presence rather than human willpower. High.
- děti Boží vs. přijetí za syna (3:1-2, 10; 5:2, cross-referenced against baseline) — Genuine risk of collapsing two distinct biblical metaphors (Johannine organic birth vs. Pauline forensic adoption) into one undifferentiated idea across this curriculum and the Romans curriculum together. High.
- chodit (1:6-7; 2:6, 11) — A highly specific idiom collision (“chodit s někým” = to date someone) that could produce an unintentionally comic or confusing misreading of “walking in darkness/light” if not glossed on first use. Medium-High.
- oběť smíření (2:2; 4:10) — Not a collision risk but a severe comprehension-void risk: a compound phrase with genuinely zero pre-existing content to draw on, at real risk of communicating nothing at all to an unprepared reader. Critical (comprehension gap).
- tělo / σάρξ (2:16 negative; 4:2 positive) — Double-duty term within the same short letter; the doctrinally essential positive incarnational sense (4:2) risks being silently absorbed by the more available negative moral-critique sense. High.
- přikázání (2:3-8; 3:22-24; 4:21; 5:2-3) — A real cultural asset (Desatero přikázání) that becomes a liability if not actively redirected, since readers will default-assume reference to the Mosaic Decalogue rather than the letter’s new love-commandment. Medium.
- důvěra / παρρησία (2:28; 3:21; 4:17; 5:14) — Comfortable, low-charge everyday word standing in for the specific forensic content of confident standing before the Judge; risk of under-teaching rather than mistranslation. High.
Summary for Phase 2 Handoff
- All baseline Critical/High terms recurring in 1 John retain their exact baseline renderings and risk tiers; no baseline entry is altered.
- Seven terms in this curriculum carry a collision risk profile unusual for this Language Package (a specific competing cultural association actively displacing correct meaning, rather than the baseline’s more typical “no framework at all” pattern): antikrist, idoly/modly, duch (folklore), hřích k smrti (Catholic taxonomy), chodit (dating idiom), vyznat se (competence idiom), and zvítězit (competitive-achievement idiom). These require forbidden-substitution flags in the AI Translation Requirements update (Step 12 continuation), parallel to the baseline’s existing forbidden-substitution list for Pán, povolání, smlouva, vyvolení, and milost.
- Two terms carry a pure consistency risk requiring identical rendering at every occurrence across every document: narodit se z Boha (~10 occurrences) and zůstávat (~20 occurrences), matching the priority the baseline gives to Romans 1:16-17, 8:28, and 10:9-10.
- All Critical- and High-risk items above require the baseline’s mandated plain-language gloss on first substantive use in every document, per the existing “Conceptual Scaffolding” requirement.