Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference and Theme Analysis — Ephesians 1–6 (English → Czech)

Methodology Note

This analysis catalogs every Old Testament quotation and allusion in Ephesians, chapter by chapter, front to back, together with messianic references, typological patterns, and direct parallels to the Romans curriculum already governed by the baseline Language Package for this destination language. Citations are given in normalizable English form (e.g. “Ephesians 2:8”, “Genesis 15:6”) throughout this analysis document for cross-curriculum consistency at the Phase 1 planning level. Final Phase 2 translated output must convert all citations to the Czech Ecumenical Translation (ČEP) book-name conventions per the baseline’s Cross-Reference Preservation Rules, extended below with the Ephesians book name.

Extended book-name mapping (adds to the Romans baseline table):

EnglishCzech (ČEP)
EphesiansEfezským
ExodusExodus
DeuteronomyDeuteronomium
EzekielEzechiel
ZechariahZachariáš
DanielDaniel
ProverbsPřísloví
1 Peter1. Petrův

Verse numbers remain Arabic numerals; citation format is Book Chapter:Verse (English) / Kniha Kapitola,Verš or Kniha Kapitola:Verš per established ČEP convention already fixed in the Romans baseline (e.g. “Římanům 3:23”). For Ephesians: “Efezským 2:8”.


Part 1 — Chapter-by-Chapter OT Quotation and Allusion Matrix

Chapter 1

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Ephesians 1:3–14Comprehensive spiritual blessing “in Christ”; election before creationGod the Father, ChristEchoes the Abrahamic blessing formula of Genesis 12:2–3 (“I will bless you…all families of the earth shall be blessed”) extended to “every spiritual blessing”; structurally parallels Jewish berakah (blessing) prayer formsMedium. The doxological, liturgical Greek sentence structure (one long sentence, vv.3–14) should not be broken so severely in Czech that the cumulative, overflowing character of the blessing is lost; “požehnání” (blessing) needs to carry forward the Genesis covenant-blessing background, not read as a vague wish for luck.
Ephesians 1:17Spirit of wisdom and revelationHoly SpiritAllusion to Isaiah 11:2 (“the Spirit of the LORD shall rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding”) — messianic endowment now given to the churchMedium. Render to preserve the allusion’s link to messianic empowerment rather than generic “smart insight.”
Ephesians 1:20Christ seated at God’s right handChrist, God the FatherDirect thematic dependence on Psalm 110:1 (“The LORD said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand”) — the most-quoted OT verse in the NT, foundational to NT ChristologyHigh. “Pravice” (right hand) as the position of supreme honor/authority must not be flattened to a merely spatial description; this is the same verse underlying the Lordship-of-Christ doctrine already Critical-rated in the Romans baseline (cf. Romans 8:34, “at the right hand of God”). Rendering must remain consistent with any prior Psalm 110:1 citation in this curriculum’s Romans materials.
Ephesians 1:22All things under Christ’s feetChristDirect allusion to Psalm 8:6 (“You have given him dominion…you have put all things under his feet”)High. The Czech rendering must preserve the totalizing, cosmic scope (“všechno pod jeho nohy”) — risk of softening into a vague statement of general respect rather than absolute cosmic authority.

Chapter 2

(2:1–10 treated in full in analysis/07_semantic_analysis.md; cross-references below cover 2:1–22 as a unit.)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Ephesians 2:1–5Death in sin, made aliveBelievers (Jew and Gentile)Echoes Ezekiel 37:1–14 (the valley of dry bones made alive by God’s breath/Spirit) as conceptual background for “made us alive” (συζωοποιέω); also echoes Genesis 2:17; 3:19 (death as consequence of sin)High. The Ezekiel background (a corporate, national resurrection image) reinforces that Ephesians 2’s “made alive” is not individualistic self-improvement but a sovereign divine act paralleling a well-known OT resurrection-of-the-dead scene; a brief cross-reference note is recommended at first teaching of this passage.
Ephesians 2:8–9Salvation by grace through faith, not worksBelieversStructurally parallel to the Abraham narrative of Genesis 15:6 (“Abraham believed the LORD, and he counted it to him as righteousness”) already treated as the anchor for the baseline’s Critical “imputed_righteousness” doctrine (Romans 4:3)Critical. This is the most important cross-reference in the letter for doctrinal consistency: Ephesians 2:8–9 must be taught and rendered so that it reinforces, rather than duplicates independently, the Romans 4 Abraham-faith teaching already established in this Language Package. See Part 3 below for the mandatory rendering-consistency rule.
Ephesians 2:13, 17Peace to those far and nearChrist, Jew and GentileDirect quotation/echo of Isaiah 57:19 (“Peace, peace, to the far and to the near, says the LORD”)High. “Pokoj” here must retain its baseline relational/covenantal sense (already High-risk in the Romans package for its collision with the everyday “quiet/leave-me-alone” meaning) while also carrying the specific Isaiah background of reconciliation extended to a formerly excluded people group.
Ephesians 2:14Christ himself is our peace; dividing wall abolishedChrist, Jew and GentilePossible echo of Isaiah 9:6–7 (“Prince of Peace”); background is the literal soreg barrier in the Second Temple separating the Court of the Gentiles from inner courtsHigh. Requires an explanatory note on the Temple’s physical dividing wall for readers with no Second Temple background — without this, “dělící stěna” (dividing wall) reads as an abstract metaphor rather than Paul’s concrete historical referent.
Ephesians 2:20Apostles and prophets as foundation, Christ the cornerstoneChrist, apostles, prophetsDirect quotation of Isaiah 28:16 (“a stone, a tested stone, a precious cornerstone”) and Psalm 118:22 (“the stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone”) — both texts also quoted in Romans 9:33 and 1 Peter 2:6–8Critical. This is a directly shared cross-curricular quotation. The Czech rendering of “cornerstone” (úhelný kámen) MUST be identical to any rendering already fixed for Romans 9:33 in this Language Package’s translation memory when that curriculum is or has been produced, per the baseline’s cross-document consistency rule. Flag for theologian review to confirm consistency.
Ephesians 2:21–22Church as holy temple, dwelling place of GodBelievers corporatelyTypological fulfillment of the Solomonic Temple (1 Kings 6, 8) and the wilderness Tabernacle (Exodus 25–40) as God’s dwelling place, now relocated to the corporate body of believers indwelt by the SpiritHigh. “Chrám” (temple) must be taught against its default heritage-tourism association (per baseline note on “kostel”); the OT temple/tabernacle typology (God’s presence dwelling among his people) needs to be made explicit, not assumed.

Chapter 3

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Ephesians 3:2–9The mystery of Gentile inclusion, now revealedPaul, GentilesEchoes Daniel 2:28–29, 47 (mystery hidden and then revealed by God alone) as the conceptual background for μυστήριον’s technical sense: a plan hidden by God, not humanly discoverable, but now disclosed by revelationCritical. This Daniel background is the single most important corrective for the “tajemství” collision risk already flagged Critical in 08_core_glossary.md: the Czech reader’s instinct (an intriguing secret, withheld for narrative effect) is the opposite of the Daniel pattern (a mystery humanly undiscoverable, now graciously disclosed). This OT connection should be taught explicitly alongside every occurrence of μυστήριον in this curriculum.
Ephesians 3:6Gentiles as fellow heirs, fellow members, fellow partakersGentiles, IsraelFulfillment of the Abrahamic promise that “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:3; cf. Genesis 22:18) and of Isaiah 49:6 (“a light to the nations”)High. Requires the same Abrahamic-covenant background already invoked for Romans 4 and Romans 9–11; render consistently with any existing rendering of these Genesis texts in the Romans curriculum.
Ephesians 3:14–15Every family named from the FatherGod the FatherWordplay on πατήρ/πατριά not reproducible in Czech; conceptually connects to God as Father of all nations, echoing the universal fatherhood implied in Malachi 2:10Medium. A translator’s note explaining the lost Greek wordplay (Father/family share a root) is recommended rather than attempting an artificial Czech equivalent.

Chapter 4

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Ephesians 4:8Christ’s ascent and gift-givingChristDirect quotation of Psalm 68:18 (“When you ascended on high, you led captives away; you received gifts among men”)Critical. This is a directly quoted OT verse, not merely an allusion; the Czech rendering must match the wording of Žalm 68:19 (ČEP verse numbering differs by one) as closely as translation constraints allow, and any note explaining Paul’s application of a victorious-king enthronement psalm to Christ’s ascension must be preserved. Flag for theologian review given the descent/ascent Christological argument built on it in 4:9–10.
Ephesians 4:9–10Christ’s descent and ascentChristExtends the Psalm 68 quotation into an argument about Christ’s incarnation (descent) and ascension (ascent) — ties directly to the baseline’s Critical “incarnation” and “resurrection_of_christ” doctrinesHigh. The descent/ascent movement should be cross-referenced explicitly with the Incarnation doctrine already established for Romans 1:3 (baseline: “vtělení”) to avoid the two curricula presenting the incarnation with inconsistent conceptual framing.
Ephesians 4:24New self created in righteousness and holinessBelieversEchoes Genesis 1:26–27 (humanity created in God’s image/likeness) — the “new self” is a renewed image-bearing, paralleling the original creationHigh. The Genesis image-of-God background should be made explicit so “nový člověk” (new self) is understood as restoration of a lost original design, not a self-help “new you.”
Ephesians 4:25Speak truth to one anotherBelieversDirect quotation of Zechariah 8:16 (“Speak the truth to one another”)Medium. Straightforward citation; low collision risk, but the source citation should be retained/footnoted for teaching credibility.
Ephesians 4:26Be angry and do not sinBelieversDirect quotation of Psalm 4:4 (LXX numbering; Psalm 4:5 in some English versions)Medium. Ensure Czech verse numbering (which follows the Hebrew/ČEP numbering, typically Žalm 4:5) is correctly cross-referenced, not the Greek Septuagint numbering, to avoid citation mismatches for readers checking their own Czech Bible.

Chapter 5

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Ephesians 5:2Christ as a fragrant offering and sacrificeChristEchoes the sacrificial system’s “pleasing aroma” language (Genesis 8:21; Exodus 29:18; Leviticus 1:9) and possibly Psalm 40:6–8Medium. “Vůně příjemná” (pleasing aroma) requires brief unpacking of OT sacrificial background for a reader with no framework for cultic offerings; low lexical risk, moderate conceptual risk.
Ephesians 5:14”Awake, O sleeper, and arise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you”BelieversA composite quotation/early hymn fragment, likely drawing on Isaiah 60:1 (“Arise, shine, for your light has come”) and Isaiah 26:19 (resurrection imagery)High. Introduced with “λέγει” (“it says”), suggesting Paul treats this as authoritative, Scripture-like material even though it is not a verbatim OT citation; the Czech rendering should preserve the citation-like introduction (“Proto se říká” / “Písmo praví” per translation choice) without overstating a precision the underlying source does not have — flag for native speaker review on how confidently to present the source.
Ephesians 5:18Do not get drunk with wineBelieversLoosely echoes Proverbs 20:1; 23:29–35 (wisdom-literature warnings against drunkenness)Low-Medium. Minor allusion; the contrast (drunkenness vs. Spirit-filling) is the main point, not the specific OT source.
Ephesians 5:31”A man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh”Adam, Eve (typologically: Christ, the Church)Direct quotation of Genesis 2:24Critical. This is a directly and precisely quoted OT verse foundational to both the doctrine of marriage and its typological application to Christ and the church (5:32, “this mystery is great” — reusing μυστήριον). The Czech rendering of Genesis 2:24 here MUST match the wording used wherever Genesis 2:24 is or will be quoted elsewhere in this Language Package’s materials, per the baseline’s shared-quotation consistency principle (see Part 3).
Ephesians 5:32The Christ-church marriage mysteryChrist, the ChurchTypological application of Genesis 2:24 to Christ and the church, paralleling OT prophetic marriage-covenant imagery for God and Israel (Hosea 1–3; Isaiah 54:5; Ezekiel 16)Critical. Requires the reader to hold together three layers: (1) the literal Genesis 2:24 marriage institution, (2) the OT prophetic pattern of God as covenant “husband” to Israel, and (3) Paul’s specific application to Christ and the church — a substantial theological load for a reader building all three categories from scratch; reuses the Critical “tajemství” term.

Chapter 6

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Ephesians 6:2–3Honor your father and motherChildren, parentsDirect quotation of Exodus 20:12 / Deuteronomy 5:16 (the fifth commandment), explicitly identified by Paul as “the first commandment with a promise”High. The Czech rendering of the Decalogue command must match the established Czech Bible-tradition wording of Exodus 20:12/Deuteronomy 5:16 exactly, since Paul’s argument depends on the reader recognizing this as a direct, verbatim quotation of a specific, well-known commandment, not a paraphrase.
Ephesians 6:9No partiality with God, master and slave alikeMasters, slavesEchoes Deuteronomy 10:17 and Leviticus 19:15 (God’s impartiality/no partiality principle)Medium. Reinforces the baseline’s “universal_scope_of_gospel” doctrine (High in Romans); the impartiality principle should be linked explicitly to Romans 2:11 (“God shows no partiality”) already present in this pipeline’s Romans materials.
Ephesians 6:14Belt of truthBelieversEchoes Isaiah 11:5 (“Righteousness shall be the belt of his waist, and faithfulness the belt of his loins”) — messianic endowment imagery reapplied to believersHigh. The Isaiah 11 messianic background (originally describing the coming Messianic king) is now extended to ordinary believers equipped with the Messiah’s own characteristics — this typological transfer needs explicit teaching.
Ephesians 6:14Breastplate of righteousnessBelieversDirect echo of Isaiah 59:17 (“He put on righteousness as a breastplate”)Critical. God’s own armor in Isaiah 59 (worn by the LORD himself as divine warrior) is now given to believers to wear — the typological transfer from divine warrior to human believer is theologically significant and easily lost if the Isaiah 59 background is not made explicit; flag for theologian review.
Ephesians 6:15Shoes of readiness from the gospel of peaceBelieversDirect echo of Isaiah 52:7 (“How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him who brings good news, who publishes peace”)High. Directly connects to the baseline’s “gospel” (evangelium, High) and “peace” (pokoj, Medium) terms; the Isaiah 52 herald imagery should be preserved rather than reduced to generic “readiness.”
Ephesians 6:16Shield of faithBelieversPossibly echoes Psalm 18:2, 30 (God/his word as a “shield”)Medium. General shield-of-God imagery common across the Psalms; low specific-citation risk.
Ephesians 6:17Helmet of salvationBelieversDirect echo of Isaiah 59:17 (“and a helmet of salvation on his head”)Critical. Same divine-warrior-to-believer typological transfer as the breastplate above; reuses baseline Critical term “spasení,” compounding both risks together — the armor passage as a whole should be flagged as a single unit for theologian review given how many Critical-tier terms and OT allusions converge here.
Ephesians 6:17Sword of the Spirit, the word of GodHoly Spirit, ScriptureContinues the Isaiah 59:17 armor sequence (cf. also Isaiah 49:2, “he made my mouth like a sharp sword”)High. Ties directly to the baseline’s “inspiration_of_scripture” doctrine (Medium in Romans); “ῥῆμα” (spoken utterance) rather than “λόγος” should be noted in any accompanying study material as a minor lexical variation worth flagging but not requiring different Czech vocabulary.

Part 2 — Messianic References and Typology Summary

TypeEphesians PassageOT Source / TypeFulfillment PatternTranslation Sensitivity
Messianic enthronementEphesians 1:20Psalm 110:1Christ exalted to God’s right hand, fulfilling the enthronement psalm applied to the Davidic MessiahCritical — see Lordship of Christ, already Critical in Romans baseline.
Messianic dominionEphesians 1:22Psalm 8:6Christ’s universal dominion, originally spoken of humanity’s creational mandate, now fulfilled supremely in Christ (cf. Hebrews 2:6–9 for the same move)High — cosmic authority claim must not be softened.
Messianic Spirit-endowmentEphesians 1:17Isaiah 11:2The Spirit that rested uniquely on the Messiah now given to the church corporatelyMedium — needs the “Spirit of the Messiah now shared” framing spelled out.
Ascended, gift-giving conquerorEphesians 4:8–10Psalm 68:18A victory-procession psalm (originally celebrating God/the king’s triumphant ascent to Zion) applied to Christ’s ascension and gift-giving to the churchCritical — direct quotation; theologian review required.
Divine warrior’s armor transferred to believersEphesians 6:14, 17Isaiah 59:17Armor originally worn exclusively by the LORD as divine warrior-judge is now given to ordinary believers, marking their participation in Christ’s own victoryCritical — the most theologically dense typological move in the letter; requires explicit teaching that believers do not generate this armor themselves but are clothed in what is properly God’s own.
Cornerstone/rejected stoneEphesians 2:20Isaiah 28:16; Psalm 118:22Christ as the rejected-yet-vindicated foundation stone of the new temple-communityCritical — shared quotation with Romans 9:33; consistency mandatory (see Part 3).
New Adam / new humanityEphesians 2:15; 4:24Genesis 1:26–27; implicit contrast with Genesis 3Christ creates “one new man” (2:15) and believers “put on the new self, created…in the likeness of God” (4:24) — a restoration/new-creation typology paralleling Adam’s original creation and fallHigh — should be cross-referenced with the baseline’s “christian_identity_in_christ” doctrine (Romans 6, High) and with Romans 5:12–21’s Adam/Christ contrast, which this curriculum’s users are likely to encounter in the companion Romans material.
Marriage as covenant typeEphesians 5:31–32Genesis 2:24; Hosea 1–3; Isaiah 54:5; Ezekiel 16Human marriage typologically depicts the Christ-Church covenant bond, drawing on the OT prophetic pattern of God as Israel’s covenant “husband”Critical — layered typology; see chapter 5 table above.
Temple typologyEphesians 2:21–22Exodus 25–40 (Tabernacle); 1 Kings 6, 8 (Temple); Ezekiel 40–48 (eschatological temple vision)The church, not a building, is now God’s dwelling place by the Spirit — fulfilling and relocating OT temple theologyHigh — must be actively taught against the “chrám” heritage-tourism default.
Exodus/redemption patternEphesians 1:7, 14 (ἀπολύτρωσις)Exodus 6:6; 15:13 (redemption from Egypt); Leviticus 25 (kinsman-redeemer)Christ’s blood accomplishes a new, decisive “exodus”-pattern redemption/ransomHigh — reinforces the baseline’s caution on “vykoupení” (commercial “buy out” collision); the Exodus background should be invoked to anchor the concept concretely rather than leaving it abstract.

Part 3 — Parallels to the Romans Curriculum and Rendering-Consistency Rules

Ephesians shares substantial doctrinal and lexical territory with Romans, already governed by the baseline Language Package for Czech. The following table identifies direct parallels and states the mandatory rendering-consistency rule for each.

Ephesians PassageShared Theme/QuotationRomans Parallel PassageRendering-Consistency Rule
Ephesians 2:8–9Salvation by grace through faith, not worksRomans 3:24, 27–28; 4:4–5; 11:5–6MANDATORY: Use the identical baseline rendering “Milostí jste spaseni skrze víru” (or the grammatically adapted form thereof) established in the Romans package for the grace/faith/works triad. The grace-works contrast in both letters must be theologically indistinguishable in Czech; any deviation must be flagged for theologian review per the baseline’s grace-merit escalation rule.
Ephesians 2:20; (typological anchor)Cornerstone citation (Isaiah 28:16; Psalm 118:22)Romans 9:33 (same combined citation)MANDATORY: The Czech rendering of “kámen úrazu” / “úhelný kámen” (stumbling stone / cornerstone) must be verbally identical in both curricula’s translated Scripture quotations, since this is the same composite OT quotation used for the same Christological argument.
Ephesians 2:11–22Unity of Jews and Gentiles; abolition of ethnic distinction “in Christ”Romans 3:29–30; 10:12; 11:17–24 (olive tree)Recommended consistency, not verbatim-mandatory (different Greek vocabulary: Ephesians uses the “dividing wall”/“one new man” imagery, Romans uses the olive-tree graft imagery). However, the underlying doctrinal claim (no remaining distinction, one people in Christ) must be taught as the same doctrine, not two separate ideas, and the baseline’s “unity_of_jews_and_gentiles” doctrine notes (Medium risk, flagged for the Czech lands’ own Jewish-Christian history) apply equally here — arguably with heightened sensitivity in Ephesians, since 2:15’s “one new humanity” is a stronger claim than Romans’ “no distinction” language and should be flagged accordingly for native speaker/theologian review.
Ephesians 4:22–24Old self / new selfRomans 6:6 (“our old self was crucified with him,” ὁ παλαιὸς ἡμῶν ἄνθρωπος — the identical Greek phrase)MANDATORY: “Starý člověk” and “nový člověk” must be rendered identically in both curricula, since Paul uses the exact same Greek phrase in both letters. Any inconsistency here would visibly fracture the shared vocabulary a learner carries between the two curricula.
Ephesians 4:7–13Spiritual gifts for building up the churchRomans 12:6–8Recommended: Reuse baseline “duchovní dary” register consistently, even though Ephesians’ specific gift-list (apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, teachers — offices) differs from Romans’ list (prophecy, service, teaching, exhortation, giving, leading, mercy — functions); the underlying doctrine (“Gifts for Building Up the Church” in this curriculum) should be explicitly taught as continuous with, not contradictory to, the Romans 12 list.
Ephesians 4:11Teaching office (διδάσκαλος)Romans 12:7 (“the one who teaches”)Recommended consistency: use “učitel” in both, flagged in both cases with the same caution against the everyday school-teacher default reading.
Ephesians 5:21–6:9Household relationships under Christ’s lordshipRomans 13:1–7 (submission to governing authorities, structurally parallel logic of submission-within-a-hierarchy grounded in God’s ordained order)Recommended: the Czech rendering of ὑποτάσσω (“podřídit se”) should be handled with the same theologian-level care given to Romans 13’s submission-to-authority language, since both passages carry live contemporary sensitivity in a strongly egalitarian secular Czech society; cross-reference the two passages explicitly in accompanying teaching notes so submission-to-authority is taught as one consistent NT ethical pattern, not two unrelated ideas.
Ephesians 6:11–17Armor imageryRomans 13:12 (“put on the armor of light,” ὅπλα τοῦ φωτός)Recommended, not verbatim-mandatory (different Greek word: ὅπλα in Romans vs. πανοπλία in Ephesians — general armament vs. full/complete armor). Render Romans’ phrase as “výzbroj světla” and Ephesians’ as “plná zbroj” without conflating the two, but a translator’s note should link them as the same broader NT metaphor of spiritual battle-readiness.
Ephesians 1:13–14Holy Spirit as seal/guarantee of future inheritanceRomans 8:23 (“we…who have the firstfruits of the Spirit,” and 8:16–17’s inheritance language)Recommended: teach ἀρραβών (záruka, “down payment/guarantee”) and Romans’ “firstfruits” (prvotiny) as two complementary images for the same doctrine (the Spirit as present, partial, guaranteed evidence of a future, complete inheritance) rather than separate concepts.
Ephesians 1:4–5Election “in Christ” before the foundation of the worldRomans 8:28–30; 9:11–13MANDATORY: “Vyvolení” and the new term “předurčení” must both be used consistently with their Romans-baseline definitions; Ephesians 1 should be taught as extending, not revising, the Romans 9–11 doctrine of election — the same forbidden-substitution caution (must not register as competitive selection) applies identically here.
Ephesians 5:2Christ’s self-giving as a sacrificial offeringRomans 3:25 (propitiation, ἱλαστήριον); Romans 12:1 (believers as living sacrifice)Recommended: maintain consistent sacrificial vocabulary (“oběť,” “obětoval sám sebe”) across both curricula so the atonement theme reads as a single coherent doctrine rather than two independent treatments.
Ephesians 6:18Prayer and intercessionRomans 8:26–27 (Spirit’s intercession); Romans 15:30–32Recommended: reuse the baseline’s “prayer_and_intercession” doctrine framing (Medium; no dominant rival intercessory framework in secular Czech culture) — teach as a single continuous theme across both letters.

General Rendering-Consistency Principle for Shared/Overlapping OT Quotations

Where Ephesians and Romans (or Ephesians and a future curriculum in this pipeline) quote the same OT verse verbatim (Psalm 118:22/Isaiah 28:16 in Ephesians 2:20 and Romans 9:33 being the clearest case in the current corpus), the Czech rendering of that OT verse must be lexically identical in both curricula’s Scripture-quotation text, even where the surrounding English commentary differs. This prevents a Czech learner encountering the “same” quoted Bible verse worded two different ways across two different lesson sets — a comprehension-eroding inconsistency this Language Package can least afford given its already-low-biblical-literacy baseline. All such shared quotations must be logged in translation_memory.json under a shared “ot_quotations” cross-reference key when Phase 2 begins, so that whichever curriculum is translated first fixes the wording for all that follow.


Coverage Note

All six chapters of Ephesians have been reviewed for OT quotation, allusion, messianic reference, and typological content. Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 each contain load-bearing cross-references; none is reviewed as contributing nothing. The highest-sensitivity findings are: (1) the directly shared Isaiah 28:16/Psalm 118:22 cornerstone citation with Romans 9:33, (2) the verbatim-shared “old self” (παλαιὸς ἄνθρωπος) phrase with Romans 6:6, (3) the Genesis 2:24 marriage quotation feeding the Critical-rated μυστήριον doctrine, and (4) the Isaiah 59:17 divine-warrior-armor typology underlying the whole of Ephesians 6:14–17. All four require theologian-level review and cross-curricular consistency checks before Phase 2 translation of either curriculum proceeds.

See analysis/10_biblical_theme_map.md for the letter’s overall theme structure and its connections across the whole of Scripture.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words