Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference and Theme Analysis — 1 Corinthians (English → Czech)

Method note: This document catalogs every identifiable Old Testament quotation and allusion, every messianic reference, every typological pattern, and every substantive parallel to the Romans Language Package across all 16 chapters of 1 Corinthians. Citations are normalized in the format Book Chapter:Verse and follow the Czech Ecumenical Translation (ČEP) book-name conventions already established in the baseline (12_ai_translation_requirements.md Cross-Reference Preservation Rules), extended here to the additional Old Testament books 1 Corinthians draws on. Where a chapter contains no direct OT quotation or new cross-reference material, it is explicitly marked “reviewed — no new citation content” rather than silently omitted, per the full-book-coverage mandate.


Book-Name Normalization Table (ČEP convention, extending the baseline)

English Book NameCzech Citation FormUsed In This Document
GenesisGenesisGenesis 1:26–27; 2:7; 2:18–23; 2:24
ExodusExodusExodus 12; 17:6; 32:6
NumbersNumeriNumeri 16:41–49; 20:2–13; 21:5–6; 25:1, 9
DeuteronomyDeuteronomiumDeuteronomium 25:4; 32:17; 32:21
JobJóbJób 5:13
PsalmsŽalmyŽalmy 8:7; 24:1; 94:11; 110:1
IsaiahIzaiášIzaiáš 22:13; 25:8; 28:11–12; 29:14; 64:3
JeremiahJeremjášJeremjáš 9:23–24
HoseaOzeášOzeáš 6:2; 13:14
Romans (this pipeline)Římanůmthroughout, see parallels table below
1 Corinthians (this curriculum)1. Korintskýmthroughout

All future Czech-language curricula in this pipeline must cite 1 Corinthians as 1. Korintským, matching the pattern already set for Římanům, so that cross-references between curricula remain navigable for the same learner.


PART A — CROSS-REFERENCE MATRIX (Chapter by Chapter)

Chapter 1 — Christian Unity versus Factionalism; The Cross as Wisdom and Power (introduced)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 1:19The Cross as Wisdom and PowerDirect quotation: Izaiáš 29:14 (“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart”).Must read as a citation of a fulfilled prophetic pattern, not a generic proverb; “moudrost” must retain its ch.1 sense (see 08 glossary) across the quotation.
1. Korintským 1:23–24The Cross as Wisdom and PowerChrist; Jews; GreeksEchoes the Jew/Gentile (“Řek”) categories central to Římanům 1:16; 3:29–30; 10:12.Reuse [TM] “pohané”/“národy” distinction conventions established in the Romans baseline; here “Řekové” (Greeks) functions as a synecdoche for Gentile wisdom-seekers, not a separate ethnic category requiring new glossary treatment.
1. Korintským 1:26–29Christian Unity versus Factionalism; Effectual CallingThematic parallel to Římanům 9:11–12 (God’s sovereign, gracious choice) and Římanům 8:28–30 (calling).[TM] “povolaný”/“vyvolení” — apply baseline’s forbidden-substitution caution: God’s choosing of “the low and despised” must not read as a secular competitive-selection process.
1. Korintským 1:31The Cross as Wisdom and PowerDirect quotation: Jeremjáš 9:23–24 (“Let him who boasts, boast in the Lord”).“chlouba”/“pyšnění se” (see 08 glossary) — ensure the contrast between self-boasting and boasting “in the Lord” ([TM] “Pán”) preserves the exclusive-Lordship weight flagged Critical in the baseline.

Chapter 2 — The Cross as Wisdom and Power (continued); Spiritual Discernment

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 2:9The Cross as Wisdom and PowerLoose citation/allusion: Izaiáš 64:3 (“what no eye has seen, nor ear heard…”). Not a verbatim LXX quotation; treat as an adapted allusion, not a precise citation.Must not be flattened into a generic proverb about surprise or good fortune; retains the “hidden-then-revealed” mystery pattern shared with 1. Korintským 2:7 (“tajemství”).
1. Korintským 2:16The Cross as Wisdom and PowerDirect quotation: Izaiáš 40:13 (“For who has known the mind of the Lord…?”).Pairs with “mysl Kristova” (mind of Christ) — see 07 semantic analysis; the quotation’s rhetorical force (no one can know God’s mind — yet believers, through the Spirit, do) must survive translation as a paradox, not a flat denial.

Chapter 3 — Christian Unity versus Factionalism (continued); Foundations of Ministry

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 3:16–17Church Discipline and Holiness (temple imagery)Typological echo of the Old Testament tabernacle/temple (no single verse; broad OT temple theology, e.g. Exodus 25–40, 1 Kings 8). Also parallels Římanům 12:1 (believers presenting their bodies) in a corporate key.”chrám Boží” — per 08 glossary, High risk; the corporate indwelling sense must be actively taught against the architectural/touristic default.
1. Korintským 3:19The Cross as Wisdom and PowerDirect quotation: Jób 5:13 (“He catches the wise in their own craftiness”).Same “moudrost tohoto světa” caution as ch.1–2; ensure the quotation reads as ironic reversal, not literal advice against cleverness in general.
1. Korintským 3:20The Cross as Wisdom and PowerDirect quotation: Žalmy 94:11 (“The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are futile”).Pairs with the 3:19 Job citation as a double-witness pattern (Law/Wisdom + Psalms); retain both citations distinctly rather than merging into one paraphrase.

Chapter 4 — Christian Unity versus Factionalism (continued); Apostolic Ministry

Reviewed — no new direct OT quotation identified. Thematic allusions only: Paul’s “father” language (4:15) extends the divine-Fatherhood category from Římanům 8:15 into a distinct, lower-risk pastoral-relational sense (see 07 semantic analysis, ch.4 note); the “spectacle” imagery of 4:9 (Paul and the apostles as a public spectacle, echoing Roman triumphal-procession imagery) has no direct OT source but connects thematically to the paradox of the cross (ch.1–2) — apparent shame concealing true honor before God.

Chapter 5 — Church Discipline and Holiness (introduced)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 5:6–8Church Discipline and HolinessTypology: Exodus 12 (the Passover instructions, leaven purged from the household) and Exodus 12:15, 19 (leaven prohibition). Christ identified as the true Passover victim.”kvas/nekvašený” and “Velikonoce (hod beránka)” — per 08 glossary, both require explicit Exodus background; “Velikonoce” collides with the secularized, folk-custom Easter holiday exactly as [TM] “vzkříšení” does in the baseline — the underlying sacrificial-lamb typology must be taught, not assumed from the holiday name.
1. Korintským 5:7Messianic typology (Christ as Passover Lamb)ChristMessianic fulfillment: the Passover lamb of Exodus 12 as a type fulfilled in Christ’s sacrificial death — connects forward to 1. Korintským 11:23–26 (the Lord’s Supper) and to Římanům 3:25 (propitiation), flagged Critical for theologian review in the baseline’s escalation rules.Route to human theologian review: this is the first explicit sacrificial-lamb typology in the curriculum and sets the pattern for ch.11’s Supper material.

Chapter 6 — Church Discipline and Holiness (continued); Christian Liberty (introduced)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 6:16Marriage and Singleness (anticipatory); Christian LibertyDirect quotation: Genesis 2:24 (“the two shall become one flesh”), also quoted by Christ in the Gospels (Matthew 19:5; Mark 10:8) — not part of this pipeline’s curricula but worth noting for future cross-curriculum consistency.”jedno tělo” — must be rendered identically here and in any future Genesis-creation or Gospel-marriage curriculum for this Language Package; flag for consistency tracking.
1. Korintským 6:19–20Church Discipline and Holiness; Christian LibertyHoly SpiritExtends ch.3’s corporate temple typology (3:16–17) to the individual believer’s body; connects to Římanům 12:1 (“present your bodies as a living sacrifice”).[TM] “Duch svatý” + “chrám” (High risk, see 08 glossary); “vykoupení” (new High-risk entry) must be distinguished from ordinary commercial “vykoupit” usage, paralleling the baseline’s “milost”/“ospravedlnění” secular-drift pattern.

Chapter 7 — Marriage and Singleness (introduced)

Reviewed — no direct OT quotation identified. Underlying allusion to the Genesis creation order (Genesis 1:28 “be fruitful and multiply”; Genesis 2:18–24) informs Paul’s positive view of marriage but is not directly cited in this chapter; the creation-order allusion is developed more explicitly later in 1. Korintským 11:7–9. No new messianic or typological content in ch.7 itself.

Chapter 8 — Christian Liberty and Idol Meat (introduced)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 8:4, 6Christian Liberty and Idol MeatEchoes the Shema, Deuteronomium 6:4 (“Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one”), restructured Christologically around “one God, the Father… and one Lord, Jesus Christ.”Connects directly to the baseline’s Critical-risk “lord” entry ([TM] “Pán”) and to Římanům 3:29–30 (“Is God the God of Jews only?… one God”); the Shema echo should be flagged for theologian review since it applies exclusive OT monotheistic language to Christ — a load-bearing deity-of-Christ text parallel to Římanům 9:5.

Chapter 9 — Christian Liberty and Idol Meat (continued); Apostolic Self-Denial

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 9:9Christian Liberty and Idol Meat (apostolic-support argument)Direct quotation: Deuteronomium 25:4 (“You shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain”).Requires explicit agrarian-legal background; Paul’s a-fortiori argument (if this applies to oxen, how much more to gospel workers) needs the logical structure preserved, not just the image.
1. Korintským 9:20Christian Liberty and Idol MeatThematic parallel to Římanům 7 (the believer’s relationship to the Mosaic Law) — Paul “became as a Jew” without himself being under the Law’s condemning power.[TM] “zákon” (High risk, per baseline) — ensure Paul’s flexible missionary posture toward the Law here is not confused with a claim that the Law is now irrelevant or non-authoritative Scripture.

Chapter 10 — Christian Liberty and Idol Meat (continued); Warning from Israel’s History

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 10:1–4Typology; Christian Liberty and Idol MeatMoses; Israel in the wildernessTypology of the Exodus generation: the cloud and sea (Exodus 13:21–22; 14:22), manna (Exodus 16), water from the rock (Exodus 17:6; Numeri 20:8–11). Christ identified as “the spiritual Rock that followed them.”Route to human theologian review: identifying Christ retroactively with the OT rock is a strong, non-obvious typological/pre-existence claim (connects to Deity of Christ, Critical in the baseline) and must not be softened into a mere literary metaphor.
1. Korintským 10:6, 11TypologyIsrael in the wildernessThe whole wilderness narrative functions as a τύπος (type/pattern) for the church — extends the baseline’s “fulfillment_of_prophecy” doctrine (Medium risk in Romans) into explicit typological reading.”typ/vzor/výstraha” (see 08 glossary) — the concept of OT-events-as-instructive-patterns-for-the-church needs explicit teaching; no assumed OT narrative literacy.
1. Korintským 10:7Christian Liberty and Idol MeatIsrael; golden calfDirect quotation: Exodus 32:6 (“the people sat down to eat and drink and rose up to play” — golden-calf idolatry).Must retain the idolatrous-feasting context; do not let “eat and drink” be read as a neutral description of ordinary dining.
1. Korintským 10:8Christian Liberty and Idol MeatIsraelAllusion: Numeri 25:1, 9 (sexual immorality with Moabite women; 23,000 fell in one day).Connects to [TM] “hřích” (High risk) and the new “smilstvo” entry (ch.5); reinforces the seriousness of sexual sin against the Czech idiom-flattening risk noted in the baseline.
1. Korintským 10:9Christian Liberty and Idol MeatIsraelAllusion: Numeri 21:5–6 (testing the Lord; the fiery serpents). Note the textual variant “tested Christ”/“tested the Lord” — flag for theologian-level textual note.Another instance applying an OT YHWH-directed narrative to Christ — connects to the Deity-of-Christ doctrine (Critical in the baseline); flag for theologian review.
1. Korintským 10:10Christian Liberty and Idol MeatIsraelAllusion: Numeri 16:41–49 (grumbling against Moses/Aaron; the destroyer).“destroyer” imagery should not be flattened into a vague misfortune; it names a specific act of divine judgment within the covenant narrative.
1. Korintským 10:20Christian Liberty and Idol MeatDirect quotation/allusion: Deuteronomium 32:17 (“they sacrificed to demons, not God”).Connects to the new “démon” entry (08 glossary, Medium risk); reinforces that pagan sacrifice has real, not merely symbolic, spiritual reality behind it.
1. Korintským 10:22Christian Liberty and Idol MeatAllusion: Deuteronomium 32:21 (“they have made me jealous with what is no god”). Note: Římanům 10:19 directly quotes this same verse (Deuteronomium 32:21) regarding Israel’s jealousy over Gentile inclusion — a genuine shared-source cross-reference between the two curricula.Rendering-consistency rule: the Czech rendering of “jealousy” (žárlivost/rozhořčení) in Deuteronomium 32:21 material must match between the Romans and 1 Corinthians curricula wherever this verse is cited, even though the applications differ (Israel’s jealousy vs. provoking the Lord through idolatry).
1. Korintským 10:26Christian Liberty and Idol MeatDirect quotation: Žalmy 24:1 (“the earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it”).Doxological parallel to Římanům 11:36 (“For from him and through him and to him are all things”); both ground practical ethics in God’s universal ownership — render with the same weight of comprehensive divine sovereignty, not a folk-proverb tone.

Chapter 11 — The Lord’s Supper (introduced); Order in Worship (introduced)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 11:7–9Order in WorshipAdam; EveAllusion: Genesis 1:26–27 (man made in God’s image) and Genesis 2:18–23 (woman made from/for man).“hlava” (headship, High risk per 08 glossary) — the creation-order allusion must be presented within Paul’s larger relational, mutually-honoring argument (11:11–12, “nor is man independent of woman”), not extracted as a bare hierarchy proof-text. Flag for human theologian review.
1. Korintským 11:23–26The Lord’s Supper; Messianic fulfillmentChrist; the Twelve (at the Last Supper)Institution narrative parallel to the Gospel accounts (Matthew 26:26–28; Mark 14:22–24; Luke 22:19–20 — outside this pipeline’s current curricula but essential background); the “new covenant” (11:25) directly echoes Jeremjáš 31:31–34 and connects to Římanům covenant vocabulary ([TM] “smlouva,” High risk).“nová smlouva” — must retain the relational-covenant weight already established for [TM] “smlouva” in the baseline, not collapse into “nová smlouva” read as merely a new commercial contract. Critical: this is the direct institution of the ordinance whose elements are named “tělo a krev” — flagged for the Catholic-liturgical-collision risk documented in 07/08.
1. Korintským 11:25Christian Unity versus Factionalism (background); The Lord’s SupperDirect echo: Jeremjáš 31:31 (“Behold, the days are coming… when I will make a new covenant”).Route to human theologian review alongside all Lord’s Supper material per the escalation rules; ensure “nová smlouva” is glossed with its Jeremiah background on first substantive use.

Chapter 12 — Spiritual Gifts and the Body of Christ (introduced)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 12:12–27Spiritual Gifts and the Body of ChristDirect thematic parallel to Římanům 12:4–5 (“we have many members in one body… so we, though many, are one body in Christ”); both use the identical body/many-members figure. No OT quotation, but the “one body, many members” image itself functions as apostolic teaching shared across both letters.Rendering-consistency rule: “tělo” and “údy” (members) must be rendered identically in both curricula’s teaching material; this is the clearest direct parallel between Romans and 1 Corinthians in the entire book and must not diverge in vocabulary between the two Language Package documents. See Section C below.
1. Korintským 12:3The Lord’s Supper (background); Lordship of ChristHoly SpiritParallel confession to Římanům 10:9 (“no one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except by the Holy Spirit”).Rendering-consistency rule: “Ježíš je Pán” must be rendered identically here and in the Romans material, accompanied by the same explanatory note pattern the baseline mandates for Římanům 10:9 (capitalization alone is an insufficient signal).

Chapter 13 — Love as the Greater Way (introduced)

Reviewed — no direct OT quotation identified. Thematic resonance with OT wisdom-literature love/covenant-loyalty language (e.g., the Hebrew hesed concept, cf. Žalmy 136) informs but is not directly cited. One lexical note of cross-reference significance: the Greek verb behind “keeps no record of wrongs” (13:5, οὐ λογίζεται τὸ κακόν) shares its root with the verb translated “counted/credited” in Genesis 15:6 and Římanům 4:3 (ἐλογίσθη — the baseline’s Critical-risk “imputed_righteousness” term). This is a lexical, not doctrinal, parallel and should NOT be forced into an identical Czech word choice, since the senses differ (God crediting righteousness vs. love not keeping a mental ledger of offense) — flagged here only so translators are aware of the shared root and do not accidentally import “přičtená spravedlnost” vocabulary into 13:5’s very different context.

Chapter 14 — Order in Worship (continued); Spiritual Gifts (continued)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 14:21Order in Worship; Spiritual GiftsDirect quotation: Izaiáš 28:11–12 (“By people of strange tongues and by the lips of foreigners will I speak to this people, and even then they will not listen”).“jazyky” (High risk, per 08 glossary) — the quotation’s original context (a sign of judgment on unbelieving Israel) must be preserved rather than read as a general endorsement of tongues-speaking; flag for native speaker review given the interpretive complexity.
1. Korintským 14:33–35Order in WorshipNo OT quotation; thematic connection to the same creation-order material underlying 1. Korintským 11:7–9.”ženy nechť ve shromáždění mlčí” (High risk, per 08 glossary) — route to human theologian review every occurrence, per the escalation rules already established.

Chapter 15 (verses 12–58) — The Resurrection of Christ and Believers (continued)

(Verses 1–11 are treated exhaustively in 07_semantic_analysis.md Part A; this section covers additional cross-reference material in vv.12–58.)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 15:3–4Messianic Promise; Resurrection of ChristChristCreedal summary alluding to Izaiáš 53:5, 8–9 (the Suffering Servant “for our sins,” “cut off,” “buried”) and Ozeáš 6:2 (“on the third day he will raise us up”) and/or Žalmy 16:10 (echoed also in Acts 2:27, outside this pipeline).Route to human theologian review: this is the doctrinal anchor of the whole curriculum’s core passage; per the baseline’s Messianic Promise doctrine (Critical), the entire OT messianic-expectation background must be actively supplied, not assumed.
1. Korintským 15:21–22, 45–49The Resurrection of Christ and Believers; Typology (Adam/Christ)Adam; ChristDirect typological parallel to Římanům 5:12–21 (Adam’s trespass vs. Christ’s grace) and direct quotation of Genesis 2:7 (“the first man Adam became a living being”) in 15:45.Rendering-consistency rule: “první Adam”/“poslední Adam” and the representative-headship logic (“in Adam… in Christ”) must be rendered with vocabulary consistent with how Romans 5 frames Adam/Christ typology, even though the Romans baseline TM does not carry a dedicated “Adam” entry — this document formally establishes that consistency requirement for Phase 2. Flag for theologian review.
1. Korintským 15:25The Resurrection of Christ and Believers; Kingdom MissionChristDirect quotation: Žalmy 110:1 (“he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet”).Applies a royal-messianic Psalm directly to Christ’s present reign; connects to [TM] “království Boží” (Medium risk) — must not be read as a merely future/fairy-tale kingdom but as Christ’s present, active reign.
1. Korintským 15:27The Resurrection of Christ and BelieversChristDirect quotation: Žalmy 8:7 (“he has put all things under his feet”) — a psalm originally about humanity’s creation-mandate dominion, applied here to Christ as the last Adam.Requires both the Genesis 1 dominion background and its Christological escalation to be taught; flag for theologian review alongside the Adam/Christ material above.
1. Korintským 15:32The Resurrection of Christ and BelieversPossible echo: Izaiáš 22:13 (“let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die”) — a proverb of despairing hedonism, here voiced as the logical (and rejected) consequence of denying the resurrection.Present as a cited example of what follows if there is no resurrection, not as the letter’s own teaching; ensure the ironic/hypothetical framing survives translation.
1. Korintským 15:54The Resurrection of Christ and BelieversDirect quotation: Izaiáš 25:8 (“he will swallow up death forever”).Connects to Assurance of Salvation (High risk in the baseline); “smrt bude pohlcena” must retain the note of decisive, final victory, not a partial or ongoing struggle.
1. Korintským 15:55The Resurrection of Christ and BelieversDirect quotation: Ozeáš 13:14 (“O death, where is your sting? O grave, where is your victory?”).“osten smrti” (Medium risk, per 08 glossary) — needs the brief explanatory gloss on the “sting” image noted in 07/08; pairs directly with 15:54’s Isaiah quotation as a double-witness pattern.

Chapter 16 — Closing Instructions (Collection, Greetings, Benediction)

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1. Korintským 16:22“Marana tha” (Aramaic, not an OT quotation) — parallel in form (untranslated transliteration) to [TM] “Abba” in Římanům 8:15.Retain transliteration per the baseline’s convention for Abba; pair with a brief gloss (“Náš Pán, přijď!“).
1. Korintským 16:22“anathema” (ἀνάθεμα) — no direct single OT source verse, but the concept of solemn covenantal exclusion echoes the herem (ban/devotion-to-destruction) category found throughout the OT conquest narratives (e.g., Joshua 6:17–18, outside this pipeline).“anathema/ať je proklet” (High risk, per 08 glossary) — must be framed against Czech folk-superstition (“uhranutí,” curses) rather than left to be read that way by default.

Reviewed — remainder of chapter 16 (collection instructions, personal greetings, holy kiss) contains no further direct OT quotation or new doctrinal cross-reference content beyond what is cataloged above.


PART B — MESSIANIC REFERENCES SUMMARY

ReferencePassageMessianic ContentRisk
Christ as fulfillment of Isaiah’s Suffering Servant1. Korintským 15:3”Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures” — anchors the entire core passage in OT messianic expectation (Izaiáš 53).Critical — connects directly to the baseline’s Messianic Promise doctrine.
Christ’s resurrection “on the third day, according to the Scriptures”1. Korintským 15:4Fulfillment pattern, likely Ozeáš 6:2 and/or Žalmy 16:10.Critical — Resurrection of Christ doctrine.
Christ as the true Passover Lamb1. Korintským 5:7Fulfills the Exodus 12 Passover typology.High — requires explicit sacrificial background.
Christ as the spiritual Rock in the wilderness1. Korintským 10:4Retroactive identification of Christ with the OT rock that gave Israel water (Exodus 17:6; Numeri 20).Critical — implicates Christ’s pre-existence and deity; route to theologian review.
Christ as the “one Lord” of the reformulated Shema1. Korintským 8:6Applies exclusive OT monotheistic confession (Deuteronomium 6:4) to Christ alongside the Father.Critical — Deity of Christ doctrine.
Christ as the last Adam, reigning per Žalmy 8 and 1101. Korintským 15:25, 27, 45Royal-messianic Psalms applied to Christ’s present and future reign; representative headship over redeemed humanity.Critical — connects Resurrection, Deity of Christ, and Kingdom Mission doctrines.

PART C — TYPOLOGY SUMMARY

Type (OT Pattern)Antitype (NT Fulfillment)PassagesTeaching Note
The Passover lamb (Exodus 12)Christ’s sacrificial death1. Korintským 5:7; connects forward to 11:23–26Must be taught with the Exodus narrative supplied, not assumed; parallels the baseline’s “seed_of_david”/“messiah” scaffolding requirement.
The wilderness generation (Exodus/Numeri narratives)The church, warned against complacency1. Korintským 10:1–11Explicit τύπος language (10:6, 11) — this is the clearest instance of Paul naming his own typological method; use as a teaching anchor for how OT narrative applies to NT believers.
The rock that followed Israel (Exodus 17; Numeri 20)Christ1. Korintským 10:4Route to theologian review; a strong pre-existence claim.
Adam, the first man (Genesis 2:7; 3)Christ, the last Adam1. Korintským 15:21–22, 45–49Direct parallel to Římanům 5:12–21; establishes the rendering-consistency rule in Section D below.
The tabernacle/temple as God’s dwelling (Exodus 25–40 et al.)The church (corporate) and the believer’s body (individual) as God’s dwelling by the Spirit1. Korintským 3:16–17; 6:19–20”chrám Boží” — High risk; architectural/touristic association must be corrected in both applications.

PART D — PARALLELS TO ROMANS: RENDERING-CONSISTENCY RULES

The following table records every substantive parallel identified between 1 Corinthians and the Romans Language Package baseline. Where a shared OT quotation, shared apostolic teaching-figure, or shared theological term appears in both curricula, the Czech rendering must be identical across both Language Package documents, consistent with the baseline’s “Theological Consistency Rules Across Documents.”

1 Corinthians PassageRomans PassageShared ElementConsistency Rule
1. Korintským 12:12–27Římanům 12:4–5”One body, many members” figureRender “tělo” and “údy” identically in both documents; this is the single clearest cross-curriculum parallel in the book.
1. Korintským 12:3Římanům 10:9”Jesus is Lord” confession, only possible by the Holy SpiritRender “Ježíš je Pán” verbatim-identically, with the same explanatory note on exclusive divine Lordship attached in both.
1. Korintským 12:8–10, 28Římanům 12:6–8Spiritual gifts listsReuse [TM] “duchovní dary” exactly; ensure individual gift names (prophecy, etc.) match across both curricula’s teaching material.
1. Korintským 15:21–22, 45–49Římanům 5:12–21Adam/Christ typology, representative headshipEstablish and reuse a single consistent Czech rendering for “první Adam”/“poslední Adam” and “in Adam”/“in Christ” corporate language across both curricula (new requirement — not present in the baseline TM).
1. Korintským 15:1–58 (whole chapter)Římanům 6:4–5; 8:11Resurrection doctrine[TM] “vzkříšení” — Critical; reuse the baseline’s plain-language narrative gloss (from what/to what/by whom) identically across both curricula, extending it explicitly to believers’ future resurrection here.
1. Korintským 15:10Římanům 3:24; 5:2, 15–17, 20–21; 6:1, 14–15; 11:5–6Grace[TM] “milost” — High; reuse baseline gloss (unmerited favor, not judicial clemency) and extend with 1 Corinthians 15:10’s additional “ongoing empowering presence” nuance identified in 07 semantic analysis.
1. Korintským 1:26–29; 7:17–24Římanům 8:28–30; 9:11–12Calling / election[TM] “povolaný”/“povolání”/“vyvolení” — High; reuse baseline forbidden-substitution cautions (vocational/competitive-selection secular drift) exactly.
1. Korintským 4:20; 6:9–10; 15:24, 50Římanům 14:17Kingdom of God[TM] “království Boží” — Medium; reuse baseline caution against the fairy-tale-kingdom association.
1. Korintským 9:8–9, 20; 15:56Římanům 7 (whole chapter)Law (Mosaic)[TM] “zákon” — High; reuse baseline caution distinguishing Mosaic Law from civil law-in-general.
1. Korintským 10:22Římanům 10:19Shared OT source: Deuteronomium 32:21Render the “jealousy/no-god” language consistently in both curricula even though the applications differ (see Chapter 10 entry above).
1. Korintským 10:26Římanům 11:36Doxological universal-sovereignty statementRender with equivalent weight of comprehensive divine ownership/sovereignty in both; avoid a folk-proverb register in either.
1. Korintským 15:3; 15:17, 56Římanům 1:18–3:20; 3:23Universal Human Accountability / Sin[TM] “hřích” — High; reuse baseline caution against the colloquial “hřích” = “a shame/pity” idiom.
1. Korintským 1:19; 1:31; 2:9; 2:16; 3:19–20; 14:21; 15:3–4, 25, 27, 54–55Římanům’s extensive use of Izaiáš across chs. 9–11Shared reliance on Izaiáš as primary OT source-textUse the established Czech citation form “Izaiáš” consistently; both curricula draw heavily on this prophet, and consistent citation format aids a learner moving between the two Language Packages.
1. Korintským 8:4, 6Římanům 3:29–30; 9:5Monotheism reformulated Christologically / Deity of ChristReuse [TM] “Bůh,” “Pán,” “Syn Boží” exactly; flag both passages for theologian review as parallel deity-of-Christ texts.

PART E — CHAPTERS REVIEWED WITH NO NEW CROSS-REFERENCE CONTENT

Per the full-book-coverage mandate, the following note applies to chapters (or portions) not otherwise itemized above: Chapter 4 (beyond the 4:15 “father” allusion noted), Chapter 7 (beyond the Genesis creation-order background noted), Chapter 13 (beyond the lexical note on λογίζεται), and the closing portions of Chapter 16 (collection logistics, personal greetings, holy kiss custom) have been reviewed in full and contain no additional direct OT quotation or cross-curriculum parallel beyond what is documented above. These chapters remain fully covered in 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md for their doctrinal and lexical content.


This document extends 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md and must be loaded alongside them, together with the Romans baseline translation_memory.json, before any Phase 2 translation of cross-referenced or OT-quotation-bearing segments. See 10_biblical_theme_map.md for the letter’s full theme structure and canonical connections beyond Romans.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words