Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference Analysis — Matthew 1–28 (English → Czech)

Purpose and Method

This document maps every identifiable Old Testament quotation, allusion, and typological pattern in the Gospel of Matthew, chapter by chapter first to last, together with (a) the related biblical character(s), (b) the New Testament/OT connection in normalized citation form, and (c) translation sensitivity notes specific to the Czech Language Package. It also identifies parallels to the Romans curriculum already anchored in this Language Package and establishes rendering-consistency rules wherever Matthew and Romans quote, echo, or draw on the same Old Testament source text or shared theological vocabulary.

Citation normalization convention for this document: citations are given in normalized English-book-name / Arabic-numeral form (e.g. Genesis 15:6, Isaiah 53:4, Matthew 5:3) to allow consistent cross-language and cross-curriculum tracking in the pipeline’s reference database. This is distinct from the final Czech-language citation convention already fixed in 12_ai_translation_requirements.md (e.g. Matouš 5:3, Izaiáš 53:4, Žalmy 22:2), which governs all Phase 2 output text. Translators must convert normalized citations to the Czech convention at the point of document assembly, never before.

Governing rule: every OT/NT term pairing already logged as a baseline Romans term (e.g. Mesiáš, Syn Boží, Pán, spravedlnost, milost, hřích, smlouva, vyvolení, spasení) is reused exactly; this document exists to surface where the same underlying OT source text or theological pattern is shared between Matthew and Romans, since unrecognized overlaps are the single greatest risk to cross-curriculum vocabulary consistency.


Cross-Reference Matrix

Chapter 1 — Genealogy and Birth

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 1:1Messianic royal lineageDavid, Abraham2 Samuel 7:12–16 (Davidic covenant); Genesis 12:1–3, 22:18 (Abrahamic promise to bless all nations); cf. Romans 1:3, 4:16–17, 9:5Medium-High. The genealogy is not decorative background but a doctrinal claim (legal Davidic heirship + Abrahamic promise fulfillment); requires the same OT covenant scaffolding Romans 4 and 9 already assume cannot be taken for granted in this Language Package.
Matthew 1:3–6Inclusion of Gentile/complicated women (Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba) in Messiah’s lineTamar, Rahab, Ruth, BathshebaGenesis 38; Joshua 2; Ruth 4; 2 Samuel 11Medium. Anticipates the Unity of Jews and Gentiles doctrine (baseline, Romans 3:29–30) and the Great Commission’s universal scope; handle historical material with pastoral care, not sensationalism.
Matthew 1:21Salvation from sinJesuscf. Psalm 130:8; Romans 5:8, 6:23Critical. First occurrence of the “salvation” concept in the Matthew curriculum; apply baseline’s mandatory narrative gloss (from what/to what/by whom) at this very first use, exactly as flagged in 07_semantic_analysis.md.
Matthew 1:23Incarnation, virgin birthIsaiah (prophet)Isaiah 7:14Critical. Fulfillment-formula citation; foundational to both Incarnation and Messianic Promise doctrines.

Chapter 2 — The Magi, Flight to Egypt, Return

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 2:6Bethlehem birthplace prophecyMicah (prophet)Micah 5:2High. Direct messianic-geography prophecy; requires OT prophetic background.
Matthew 2:15New Exodus / Son typologyHosea (prophet); Israel (corporate)Hosea 11:1High. Matthew applies a corporate-Israel text (“out of Egypt I called my son”) typologically to the individual Messiah; must be taught as typological fulfillment, not a simple one-to-one predictive quote, or the logic will appear to a secular reader as a misquotation.
Matthew 2:18Lament over slaughtered innocentsJeremiah (prophet); RachelJeremiah 31:15Medium-High. Jeremiah 31 is also the New Covenant chapter (Jeremiah 31:31–34), directly anticipating Matthew 26:28 and Romans 11:27; worth a forward cross-reference note.
Matthew 2:23”He shall be called a Nazarene”No single identifiable OT text (candidates: Isaiah 11:1 “netzer”/branch; Judges 13:5,7 Nazirite wordplay)Medium-High. Do not assert false certainty about the source; note the interpretive difficulty explicitly rather than silently resolving it.

Chapter 3 — John the Baptist; Jesus’ Baptism

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 3:3Forerunner/way-preparationJohn the Baptist; IsaiahIsaiah 40:3High. Foundational to repentance-and-kingdom-entry doctrine.
Matthew 3:17Sonship of Christ declaredGod the Father; the SonAllusion to Psalm 2:7 and Isaiah 42:1 (not direct quotation)Critical. First explicit divine testimony to Sonship of Christ; reuses baseline Syn Boží (Critical).

Chapter 4 — Temptation; First Disciples; Galilee Ministry Begins

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 4:4Resisting temptation by ScriptureJesus, Moses (via Deuteronomy)Deuteronomy 8:3Medium.
Matthew 4:6Satan’s misuse of ScriptureSatanPsalm 91:11–12 (quoted out of context by the tempter)High. A rare case where the Devil himself quotes Scripture; the text must make clear this is a misapplication, not an endorsed reading — relevant background for discernment teaching.
Matthew 4:7Resisting temptationJesusDeuteronomy 6:16Medium.
Matthew 4:10Exclusive worship of GodJesus, SatanDeuteronomy 6:13Medium-High. Directly relevant to the worship/homage (προσκυνέω) trajectory flagged in 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md.
Matthew 4:15–16Light to the Gentiles/nationsIsaiahIsaiah 9:1–2High. Anticipates Great Commission; connects to Romans 15:9–12’s nations-rejoicing catena.

Chapter 5 — The Beatitudes (Core Passage) and the Sermon’s First Half

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 5:3–12Kingdom character and blessingJesus (speaker)Echoes Isaiah 61:1–3 (comfort for mourners, the poor); Psalm 37:11 (meek inherit the earth, quoted directly at 5:5)High. Psalm 37:11 is a direct quotation embedded in the Beatitudes; the eschatological “earth” inheritance must be tied to renewed creation, not escape from the physical world (see 07_semantic_analysis.md).
Matthew 5:17Fulfillment, not abolition, of Law and ProphetsJesus, MosesProgrammatic statement over the whole Torah/Prophets corpusCritical. Central hinge for “Fulfillment of Old Testament Prophecy” and “Righteousness Exceeding the Pharisees.”
Matthew 5:21Antithesis: murderMoses (via Exodus)Exodus 20:13; Deuteronomy 5:17Medium.
Matthew 5:27Antithesis: adulteryMosesExodus 20:14Medium.
Matthew 5:31Antithesis: divorceMosesDeuteronomy 24:1Medium-High. Sensitive contemporary topic (see also Matthew 19:3–9 below).
Matthew 5:33Antithesis: oathsMosesLeviticus 19:12; Numbers 30:2; Deuteronomy 23:21Medium.
Matthew 5:38Antithesis: retaliationMosesExodus 21:24; Leviticus 24:20Medium.
Matthew 5:43Antithesis: love of enemies; love of neighborMosesLeviticus 19:18HIGH — mandatory rendering-consistency rule. Leviticus 19:18 is quoted three times in Matthew (5:43, 19:19, 22:39) and in Romans 13:9. The Czech rendering of “milovat svého bližního jako sebe samého” must be verbatim-identical across all four Matthean/Pauline occurrences in this pipeline. See Consistency Rule 1 below.

Chapter 6 — Piety, Prayer, Provision

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 6:9–13The Lord’s PrayerJesus (teaching); reuses baseline OtecEchoes Jewish liturgical prayer patterns (Kaddish); no direct OT quotationCritical (per baseline’s existing note on Father/svatý). The single most memorized text in the Gospel; strict cross-document rendering consistency required.
Matthew 6:24Mammon as rival masterNo direct OT quotation; thematic echo of idolatry warnings (e.g. Exodus 20:3–5)Medium. Chapter reviewed in full; no additional load-bearing OT citations beyond the Lord’s Prayer allusions above.

Chapter 7 — Judging, Narrow Gate, Fruit, Authority

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 7:21–23False profession vs. true obedienceJesusParallels the Lordship-confession warning structure later echoed at Matthew 25:11–12 and directly parallels Romans 10:9’s confession doctrineHigh. Direct Matthean counterpart to Romans 10:9; must carry equal theological weight (see 07_semantic_analysis.md).
Matthew 7:24–27Wise/foolish buildersGeneral wisdom-tradition parallel (cf. Proverbs); no direct citationMedium. Chapter reviewed in full; remaining verses (narrow gate, fruit-testing) carry no additional direct OT citations beyond the above.

Chapter 8 — Healing Ministry

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 8:11Gentile inclusion at the patriarchs’ tableAbraham, Isaac, JacobGenesis 12 (Abrahamic promise); cf. Romans 4:16–17, 9:6–13, 11:28High. Direct link to the baseline’s Romans 4/9/11 Abraham material; same three patriarchs anchor both curricula’s argument for Gentile inclusion.
Matthew 8:17Healing as fulfillment of Servant prophecyIsaiah; the Suffering ServantIsaiah 53:4CRITICAL — shared-source rule. Directly draws on the same Isaiah 53 Servant Song that Romans 10:16 quotes (Isaiah 53:1). See Consistency Rule 2 below. Must not be flattened into a generic “he healed people” statement stripped of its Servant-prophecy identity claim.

Chapter 9 — Forgiveness, Calling of Matthew, Compassion

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 9:13Mercy over ritualHosea (prophet)Hosea 6:6High. Repeated verbatim at Matthew 12:7; must render identically both times.
Matthew 9:36Shepherd/sheep compassionEzekiel 34; Numbers 27:17; 1 Kings 22:17Medium. Shepherd typology anticipates Matthew 25:31–46 (sheep and goats); flag as a recurring pastoral image across the book.

Chapter 10 — Sending of the Twelve

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 10:6Staged mission: Israel firstIsrael (corporate)Ezekiel 34 (lost sheep imagery)Medium. Must not be read as a permanent ethnic restriction, later universalized at Matthew 28:19.
Matthew 10:34–36”Not peace but a sword”Micah 7:6Medium-High — doctrinal disambiguation required. This must not be confused with, or read as contradicting, the baseline’s “Peace with God” doctrine (pokoj s Bohem, Romans 5:1). Matthew 10:34 describes relational division between disciple and world/family; Romans 5:1 describes covenantal peace with God secured through justification. These are two distinct referents using related vocabulary and must be clearly distinguished in teaching material.
Matthew 10:32–33Confess/deny ChristDirect Matthean counterpart to Romans 10:9–10’s confession doctrineHigh. See 07_semantic_analysis.md; must be cross-referenced explicitly.

Chapter 11 — John’s Question; Woes; Jesus’ Yoke

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 11:5Messianic signsIsaiahIsaiah 35:5–6; Isaiah 61:1High. Ties healing miracles directly to Isaianic messianic-age expectation; foundational to “Jesus as the Promised Messiah.”
Matthew 11:10Forerunner/messengerMalachi; John the BaptistMalachi 3:1; Exodus 23:20Medium-High.
Matthew 11:14Elijah typologyElijah; John the BaptistMalachi 4:5–6High. Establishes a named OT-figure typology (Elijah → John the Baptist) that recurs at Matthew 17:10–13.
Matthew 11:23Judgment warningSodom (typological reference)Genesis 19 (background)Medium.
Matthew 11:28–30The easy yokeAllusive echo of Jeremiah 6:16 (“rest for your souls”)High. See 07_semantic_analysis.md’s “jho” risk note; the OT echo (rest for souls) should reinforce, not obscure, the restful (not oppressive) sense intended.

Chapter 12 — Sabbath Controversies; Servant Song; Sign of Jonah

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 12:3–4David’s precedent for Jesus’ authorityDavid1 Samuel 21:1–6Medium-High. David-typology directly authorizing Jesus’ own authority claim — reinforces “Son of David” and “Authority of Jesus’ Teaching” together.
Matthew 12:5Priestly Sabbath exceptionMoses (via Numbers)Numbers 28:9–10Medium.
Matthew 12:7Mercy over sacrifice (repeat)HoseaHosea 6:6High (repeat of 9:13; render identically).
Matthew 12:18–21The Servant of the LordIsaiah; the Suffering ServantIsaiah 42:1–4Critical. The longest single direct OT quotation in Matthew; explicitly identifies Jesus with Isaiah’s Servant figure — the same prophetic figure behind Isaiah 53 (see Matthew 8:17, 20:28 below, and Romans 10:16).
Matthew 12:39–41Sign of Jonah — resurrection typologyJonahJonah 1:17; Jonah 3:5High. Explicit OT typological prediction of the Resurrection (Critical baseline doctrine).
Matthew 12:42Greater than SolomonSolomon; Queen of Sheba1 Kings 10Medium.

Chapter 13 — Parables of the Kingdom

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 13:14–15Hardened perceptionIsaiahIsaiah 6:9–10CRITICAL — shared-source rule. This same hardening motif recurs in Romans 11:8 (quoting Deuteronomy 29:4/Isaiah 29:10) as part of Paul’s argument about Israel’s partial and temporary hardening. See Consistency Rule 3 below: both curricula must present hardening as judicial-but-not-final, never as irrevocable rejection, to avoid contradicting each other pastorally.
Matthew 13:35Hidden things disclosed in parablesPsalm (Asaph)Psalm 78:2Medium.
Matthew 13:43Eschatological radiance of the righteousDanielDaniel 12:3Medium-High.

Chapter 14 — Death of John; Feeding of 5,000; Walking on Water

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 14:13–21Feeding miracle — new-Moses/new-Elisha typologyMoses; ElishaExodus 16 (manna); 2 Kings 4:42–44 (Elisha’s feeding miracle)Medium. No direct quotation, but strong typological pattern reinforcing “greater than Moses” Christology that undergirds the Sermon on the Mount’s authority claims (ch. 5). Chapter otherwise reviewed; no further direct OT citations.
Matthew 14:27Possible divine self-disclosureJesusPossible echo of Exodus 3:14 (LXX ἐγώ εἰμι)High. Flag, do not over-assert (see 07_semantic_analysis.md).

Chapter 15 — Tradition of the Elders; the Canaanite Woman

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 15:4Honoring parentsMosesExodus 20:12; Deuteronomy 5:16; Exodus 21:17Medium.
Matthew 15:8–9External religion indictedIsaiahIsaiah 29:13HIGH — shared-source rule. Isaiah 29 is the same prophetic oracle Paul draws on in Romans 11:8 (Isaiah 29:10, on hardened perception, cross-referenced with Matthew 13:14–15 above). Both curricula draw on Isaiah 29’s larger indictment-and-hardening theme; use consistent framing of Isaiah 29 as addressing hardened, externalized religion rather than treating the two Matthew/Romans citations as unrelated.
Matthew 15:22”Son of David” invoked by a GentileCanaanite womanMedium-High. A Gentile’s use of the messianic title anticipates the doctrine’s universal reach (cf. Romans 15:8–12).

Chapter 16 — Peter’s Confession; the Keys; First Passion Prediction

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 16:16”Son of the living God”PeterEchoes Psalm 2; Daniel 6:26; Hosea 1:10Critical. Doctrinal climax; mandatory theologian review, verbatim consistency across documents (see 08_core_glossary.md).
Matthew 16:18–19Keys of the kingdomPeterPossible echo of Isaiah 22:22 (“key of the house of David”)Critical. Denominational sensitivity already flagged in Step 2; the Isaiah 22:22 “key of David” background, if referenced, should be framed as delegated stewardship authority, not singular institutional succession, consistent with this curriculum’s tradition.
Matthew 16:27Judgment according to deedsPsalm 62:12; Proverbs 24:12High — cross-curriculum sensitivity. This “reward according to deeds” language directly parallels Romans 2:6 (“God will render to each according to his works”). Both must be harmonized with the Grace doctrine already established as Critical/High in the Romans baseline: works are the evidence, not the basis, of right standing with God. Flag for theologian review wherever both passages are taught together.

Chapter 17 — The Transfiguration

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 17:5”Listen to him”God the Father; Moses (typologically)Echoes Psalm 2:7, Isaiah 42:1, and Deuteronomy 18:15 (“a prophet like Moses… listen to him”)Critical. The Deuteronomy 18:15 echo directly grounds “The Authority of Jesus’ Teaching” in the promised Moses-like-prophet typology; this connection should be made explicit rather than left implicit.
Matthew 17:10–13Elijah typology confirmedElijah; John the BaptistMalachi 4:5–6 (repeat of 11:14)High.

Chapter 18 — Church Discipline and Forgiveness

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 18:16Two-or-three-witness procedureMosesDeuteronomy 19:15High. Direct legal-procedural OT text imported wholesale into the church-discipline doctrine; foundational textual anchor for “The Church and Church Discipline.”
Matthew 18:20Gathered in his nameBackground parallel to Jewish communal-prayer (minyan) tradition; no direct OT quotationMedium.
Matthew 18:23–35Unforgiving servant; debt/forgivenessThematic parallel to the “debt” metaphor for sin already flagged at Matthew 6:12Medium.

Chapter 19 — Divorce, Children, Rich Young Man

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 19:4Creation order — male and femaleAdam, Eve (implied)Genesis 1:27High. Grounds marriage teaching in creation, reasserting created design over Mosaic concession (19:8, referencing Deuteronomy 24:1).
Matthew 19:5Creation order — one fleshAdam, Eve (implied)Genesis 2:24High.
Matthew 19:18–19Commandments summarizedMosesExodus 20:12–16; Deuteronomy 5:16–20; Leviticus 19:18 (repeat)High. Third Matthean occurrence of Leviticus 19:18 (see Consistency Rule 1).
Matthew 19:25”Who then can be saved?”Directly reuses baseline spasení (Critical)Critical. Apply baseline’s mandatory narrative gloss again at this occurrence.
Matthew 19:28Twelve tribes / restorationThe Twelve; IsraelRestoration-of-Israel typology (cf. Ezekiel 37)Medium.

Chapter 20 — Laborers in the Vineyard; the Ransom Saying

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 20:1–16Grace vs. merit (vineyard parable)Shares vineyard imagery with Isaiah 5:1–7 (though used differently: labor/wage rather than judgment)High. The clearest Matthean narrative dramatization of the baseline’s Grace doctrine (grace ≠ merit); direct companion text to Romans 4:4–5 and 11:5–6.
Matthew 20:28Ransom for manyJesus; the Son of ManEchoes Isaiah 53:10–12 (“the many,” rabbim; the Servant’s soul as an offering)CRITICAL — shared-source rule. See Consistency Rule 2. Directly parallel to Romans 5:15–19’s “the many” (hoi polloi) contrasted with Adam. Mandatory theologian review.

Chapter 21 — Triumphal Entry, Temple, Judgment Parables

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 21:5Humble king on a donkeyJesusZechariah 9:9; Isaiah 62:11Critical. Deliberate humble-king messianic fulfillment; combined citation.
Matthew 21:9Hosanna acclamationCrowdsPsalm 118:25–26High. Repeated at Matthew 23:39.
Matthew 21:13Temple’s true purpose corruptedIsaiah 56:7; Jeremiah 7:11Medium-High.
Matthew 21:16Praise from childrenPsalm 8:2Medium.
Matthew 21:33–41Vineyard/tenants judgment parableDirect allusion to Isaiah 5:1–7 (vineyard-planting details closely match)High. Judgment on unfaithful leadership; rejection-of-prophets-and-Son motif.
Matthew 21:42The rejected stone becomes cornerstonePsalm 118:22–23HIGH — shared-source rule. See Consistency Rule 4: Matthew’s “cornerstone” (Psalm 118) and Romans 9:33/10:11’s “stone of stumbling/cornerstone” (Isaiah 8:14 + 28:16) draw on different source texts but the same stone-Christology family; Czech vocabulary must clearly differentiate foundation-sense from stumbling-sense per occurrence while remaining recognizably part of one image-family.
Matthew 21:43”Kingdom of God” (sole Matthean use)Direct terminological link to baseline kingdom_of_god (Romans doctrine)Medium. Must render as království Boží, not Matthew’s usual království nebeské (see 08_core_glossary.md note 3).

Chapter 22 — Wedding Feast; Greatest Commandment; David Calls Him Lord

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 22:14Many called, few chosenCombines baseline called and election terms in one verseHigh. See 07_semantic_analysis.md/08_core_glossary.md.
Matthew 22:24Levirate marriage questionMosesDeuteronomy 25:5Medium.
Matthew 22:32God of the living — resurrection argumentAbraham, Isaac, JacobExodus 3:6High. Same three patriarchs anchor Romans 4, 9, 11’s argument for God’s covenant faithfulness.
Matthew 22:37Love the Lord your God (the Shema)MosesDeuteronomy 6:5High. Not directly quoted in Romans but foundational to the Jewish confession “God is one” background relevant to Romans 3:30.
Matthew 22:39Love your neighbor (repeat)MosesLeviticus 19:18HIGH — mandatory rendering-consistency rule (fourth occurrence across the two curricula). See Consistency Rule 1.
Matthew 22:44David calls the Messiah “Lord”DavidPsalm 110:1Critical. Foundational OT text behind the “Lord” (Pán) Christology; echoed again at Matthew 26:64 and implicit in Romans 8:34.

Chapter 23 — Woes Against the Pharisees and Scribes

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 23:35Line of murdered prophetsAbel; ZechariahGenesis 4; 2 Chronicles 24:20–22Medium-High. Establishes a prophetic-martyrdom typology spanning the entire Hebrew canon (from Genesis to Chronicles, “first to last book” in the traditional Hebrew Bible ordering).
Matthew 23:37–39Lament over JerusalemJerusalem (personified)Psalm 118:26 (repeat)High. Care that this lament over historic Jerusalem is not read through contemporary Middle East political associations (per baseline’s existing note on “Israel”).

Chapter 24 — The Olivet Discourse

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 24:15Abomination of desolationDanielDaniel 9:27; 11:31; 12:11High. Requires substantial Danielic apocalyptic background.
Matthew 24:21Great tribulationDanielDaniel 12:1Medium.
Matthew 24:29–30Cosmic signs; Son of Man comingIsaiah; DanielIsaiah 13:10; 34:4; Daniel 7:13–14Critical. Directly grounds the Parousia doctrine in Daniel’s Son of Man vision.
Matthew 24:37–39Flood typologyNoahGenesis 6–7Medium-High. Judgment-pattern typology.

Chapter 25 — Judgment Parables

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 25:31–46Sheep and goats judgmentEzekiel 34:17High. Direct OT source for the sheep/goats judgment imagery.
Matthew 25:14–30Talents/stewardshipGeneral wisdom-tradition parallel; no direct OT citationMedium.

Chapter 26 — Last Supper, Gethsemane, Arrest, Trial

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 26:2Passover typologyJesus (as Passover Lamb, implicit)Exodus 12Critical typological connection (implicit, not stated directly by Matthew). Relevant to Romans’ sacrificial/substitutionary atonement language (Romans 3:25), though Paul does not use Passover-lamb imagery directly (cf. 1 Corinthians 5:7, outside this curriculum, for the explicit NT statement of this typology).
Matthew 26:28Blood of the covenant, for forgiveness of sinsJesus; Moses (typologically)Exodus 24:8 (Mosaic covenant blood); Jeremiah 31:31–34 (New Covenant)Critical. Reuses baseline smlouva (High) and hřích (High) at maximum theological density; directly anticipates Romans 11:27’s citation of the same New Covenant promise.
Matthew 26:31Shepherd struck, sheep scatteredZechariahZechariah 13:7High.
Matthew 26:64Son of Man at God’s right handJesusDaniel 7:13; Psalm 110:1 (combined)Critical. Combines the two major OT texts (Daniel 7, Psalm 110) behind both the Son of Man and Lord/Christ titles; directly parallel to Matthew 22:44 above.
Matthew 27:9–10Thirty pieces of silverJudasZechariah 11:12–13, though the text attributes the citation to Jeremiah (a well-known text-critical feature)Medium-High. Do not silently “correct” the attribution in translation; a brief translator note explaining the compound/attributed citation is preferable to either ignoring the difficulty or overclaiming certainty.

Chapter 27 — Crucifixion and Burial

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 27:35Dividing garments, casting lotsPsalm 22:18High.
Matthew 27:39Mockery, wagging headsPsalm 22:7Medium-High.
Matthew 27:43”He trusts in God” mockeryPsalm 22:8Medium-High.
Matthew 27:46Cry of derelictionJesusPsalm 22:1Critical. Retain transliterated Aramaic Elí, Elí, lema sabachthani per the established “Abba” convention (see 07_semantic_analysis.md); mandatory theologian review.
Matthew 27:54Gentile confession of SonshipRoman centurionClimactic confession, not an OT citation; parallels Matthew 16:16Critical. Reuses baseline Syn Boží.

Chapter 28 — Resurrection and the Great Commission

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Matthew 28:18All authority givenJesus (the Son of Man)Daniel 7:14Critical. Climactic fulfillment of the Son of Man authority granted in Daniel’s vision.
Matthew 28:19–20Great Commission to all nationsJesus; the disciplesEchoes Genesis 12:3/22:18 (Abrahamic blessing to all nations); Isaiah 49:6 (light to the nations); Psalm 2:8 (nations as inheritance)High. Fulfills the Abrahamic promise first cited at Matthew 1:1; directly connects to Romans 1:5, 15:8–12, and 16:26’s “obedience of faith… among all nations.”

Major Typological Patterns Across the Book

TypeOT RootMatthean DevelopmentCross-Curriculum Note
New MosesMoses as lawgiver, prophet, deliverer from Egypt (Exodus; Deuteronomy 18:15)Infancy flight from/return to “Egypt” (2:15); teaching from a mountain (5:1); feeding miracles (14:13–21); “listen to him” (17:5)Reinforces “Authority of Jesus’ Teaching”; no direct Romans parallel, but supports the same Christological weight Romans places on Christ’s supremacy (Romans 8:3–4, 10:4).
New/Greater David2 Samuel 7; Psalm 110Genealogy (1:1); “Son of David” acclamations (9:27, 15:22, 20:30, 21:9); David-authorizes-Jesus argument (12:3–4); Psalm 110 argument (22:44)Directly parallel to Romans 1:3 (“descended from David”) and Romans 9:5.
Suffering ServantIsaiah 42, 49, 50, 52–53Healing ministry (8:17); Servant identification (12:18–21); ransom saying (20:28)Directly shares source material with Romans 10:16 (Isaiah 53:1) and Romans 15:21 (Isaiah 52:15); see Consistency Rule 2.
Jonah / three daysJonah 1–3Sign of Jonah (12:39–41)Typological ground for the Resurrection doctrine (Critical in both curricula’s Christological frameworks).
Passover LambExodus 12Last Supper set explicitly within Passover (26:2, 17–19)Implicit atonement typology; complements Romans 3:24–25’s more forensic/sacrificial vocabulary (redemption, propitiation) without duplicating it lexically.
Vineyard = IsraelIsaiah 5:1–7Laborers parable (20:1–16, different application); tenants parable (21:33–41, judgment application)No direct Romans citation, but thematically parallel to Romans 11:17–24’s olive-tree metaphor for Israel/Gentile relationship — both use a cultivated-plant image for God’s people; keep the two plant-metaphors (vineyard/olive tree) visually and conceptually distinct in Czech to avoid readers merging them into one image.
Shepherd and flockEzekiel 34; Numbers 27:17Compassion on the crowds (9:36); sheep and goats judgment (25:31–46)No direct Romans parallel; connects forward canonically to John 10 (outside this curriculum).
Elijah forerunnerMalachi 4:5–6John the Baptist identified as Elijah-typology (11:14; 17:10–13)No Romans parallel; purely intra-Matthean/OT typology.

Rendering-Consistency Rules for Shared Quotations (Matthew ↔ Romans)

Rule 1 — Leviticus 19:18 (“love your neighbor as yourself”). Quoted at Matthew 5:43, 19:19, and 22:39, and at Romans 13:9. All four occurrences MUST use the identical Czech rendering: “miluj svého bližního jako sebe samého.” Any variation (e.g. “milovat bližního svého” vs. “miluj svého bližního”) must be flagged and corrected before Phase 2 approval, per the baseline’s cross-document consistency rule for shared Scripture citations.

Rule 2 — Isaiah 53 / the Suffering Servant “many” (rabbim) language. Isaiah 53:4 (Matthew 8:17), Isaiah 53:10–12 (echoed at Matthew 20:28’s “ransom for many” and Matthew 26:28’s “poured out for many”), and Isaiah 53:1 (quoted directly in Romans 10:16) all draw on a single prophetic Servant-figure and its climactic “the many” (Czech: mnozí/za mnohé) language, which Romans 5:15–19 also uses of the many under Adam and the many under Christ. The Czech word family used for “many” in these atonement contexts (mnozí, za mnohé) must be applied consistently across Matthew 20:28, 26:28, and any teaching material connecting these to Romans 5:15–19, so that a reader moving between the two curricula recognizes the shared theological argument rather than encountering what appears to be unrelated vocabulary.

Rule 3 — Isaiah 6:9–10 and Isaiah 29:10/13 (hardened perception). Matthew 13:14–15 (quoting Isaiah 6:9–10) and Matthew 15:8–9 (quoting Isaiah 29:13) must be taught, alongside Romans 11:8 (quoting Deuteronomy 29:4/Isaiah 29:10), with a consistent doctrinal framing: hardening of perception is judicial and real but not final or irrevocable — Romans 11:11–32 explicitly develops this into the doctrine of Israel’s partial, temporary hardening with a future restoration in view. Teaching material in either curriculum must not present hardening language in a way that would contradict this framing if a learner encounters both curricula.

Rule 4 — “Stone/cornerstone” imagery. Matthew 21:42 (Psalm 118:22–23, “the stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone”) and Romans 9:33/10:11 (Isaiah 8:14 + 28:16, “a stone of stumbling… whoever believes in him will not be put to shame”) draw on different OT source texts but the same stone-Christology image family. Czech renderings must use a recognizable shared vocabulary root (kámen) while clearly distinguishing sense per occurrence: kámen úhelný (cornerstone/foundation sense, Matthew 21:42) versus kámen úrazu (stumbling-stone sense, Romans 9:33) — note that kámen úrazu is the identical idiom already flagged as a Medium-risk secular collision for “stumbling block” (σκάνδαλον) at Matthew 18:6–9; translators must track which of the two distinct theological uses of this idiom is active in a given passage.

Rule 5 — Davidic Lordship texts (Psalm 110:1). Quoted or echoed at Matthew 22:44 and Matthew 26:64, and structurally presupposed in Romans 8:34 (“who is at the right hand of God”). All three must reinforce, not merely coexist with, the single baseline Pán (Lord) doctrine; teaching material should cross-reference Matthew 22:44 explicitly whenever Romans 8:34 or 10:9 is taught, since Psalm 110:1 is the OT root of the “Lord” title’s exclusive divine-authority sense in both curricula.

Rule 6 — Genesis patriarchal material (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob). Matthew 1:1, 8:11, and 22:32 all invoke the patriarchs in ways that presuppose the same Abrahamic covenant material Romans 4, 9, and 11 develop at length (though Matthew does not quote Genesis 15:6 directly, as Romans 4:3 does). Both curricula’s treatment of Abraham as the recipient of God’s unconditional promise-by-faith must remain theologically consistent; a learner should recognize the same Abraham across both books, not two disconnected figures.

Rule 7 — “Reward/wages according to works” language (Psalm 62:12/Proverbs 24:12 via Matthew 16:27; Romans 2:6). Both texts affirm a real, personal accounting before God for deeds done. Both curricula must frame this consistently as evidence of genuine faith and standing, never as the ground of justification, to avoid contradicting the Grace and Justification doctrines already Critical/High in the Romans baseline. Flag any teaching passage combining Matthew 16:27 and Romans 2:6 for mandatory theologian review.


Parallels to the Romans Curriculum: Doctrine-Level Bridge Summary

Matthew Doctrine (this curriculum)Corresponding Romans Doctrine (baseline)Key Shared or Parallel Texts
Jesus as the Promised Messiah and Son of DavidMessianic Promise; Davidic CovenantMatthew 1:1, 21:9, 22:42–45 ↔ Romans 1:3, 9:5, 15:8–12
Fulfillment of Old Testament ProphecyFulfillment of ProphecyMatthew’s ~12 fulfillment-formula citations ↔ Romans 3:21, 10:11, 15:8–12
The Kingdom of HeavenKingdom MissionMatthew 4:17, 5:3–10, 13 (parables) ↔ Romans 14:17
The Authority of Jesus’ TeachingLordship of Christ; Obedience of FaithMatthew 7:28–29, 28:18 ↔ Romans 10:9, 1:5, 16:26
Righteousness Exceeding the PhariseesRighteousness; Universal Human AccountabilityMatthew 5:20, 5:48, 23 (woes) ↔ Romans 3:20–23, 10:3
The Church and Church DisciplineChurch as God’s PeopleMatthew 16:18, 18:15–20 ↔ Romans 12:4–5, 16:1–16
The Great CommissionMission to the Nations; Universal Scope of the GospelMatthew 28:19–20 ↔ Romans 1:5, 1:16, 10:12–13, 15:19–24
Judgment and the End of the AgeAssurance of Salvation (contrastive); ProvidenceMatthew 24–25 ↔ Romans 2:6–11, 8:1, 8:28–39, 14:10–12
Discipleship and the Cost of Following JesusChristian Identity in ChristMatthew 10:32–39, 16:24–26 ↔ Romans 6:1–11, 8:1, 12:1–2

Summary Observation for Phase 1 Step 4

Matthew’s Old Testament citation density (roughly sixty identifiable direct quotations and major allusions across twenty-eight chapters) is substantially higher than Romans’, and several of its source texts (Isaiah 53, Leviticus 19:18, Psalm 110, Psalm 118, Isaiah 6/29’s hardening motif) are shared load-bearing texts with the Romans baseline. The single greatest cross-curriculum risk identified in this analysis is not mistranslation of any individual OT quotation but inconsistent Czech rendering of the same source text across the two curricula, which would silently obscure the very typological and canonical connections this curriculum is meant to teach. All seven consistency rules above should be loaded into Phase 2 alongside translation_memory.json before any segment referencing these texts is processed.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words