Linguistic Gap Analysis — Matthew (German)

Continuing the established finding across all five prior German packages: German again has precise native vocabulary for nearly every concept in Matthew (selig, Reich der Himmel, Menschensohn, Lösegeld), with the recurring gap categories being sensitivity/historical-framing rather than any absence of vocabulary — and Matthew introduces the single most severe instance of the sensitivity-gap category anywhere in this pipeline.

Terms requiring careful qualification

• Selig (μακάριος): no vocabulary gap, but a partial associative gap — the word’s Catholic technical sense (Seligsprechung, beatification) risks narrowing its Sermon-on-the-Mount sense for some readers; requires brief qualification rather than a substitute word.
• Buße (repentance, μετάνοια): no vocabulary gap, but the same confessional-history gap already identified for kenosis and predestination in prior packages — a precise German word whose theological content has itself been historically contested (the Reformation-era sacramental-penance dispute).
• Reich der Himmel vs. Reich Gottes: no vocabulary gap at all — both phrases are precise and well-established — but a documentation gap: this distinction is rarely made explicit for lay readers, even though Matthew’s own consistent preference for the “heaven” phrasing is a recognized literary feature.

The most severe sensitivity gap in this pipeline: Matthew 27:25 and Matthew 23

• “Sein Blut komme über uns und unsere Kinder” and “Wehe euch, Schriftgelehrte und Pharisäer”: in both cases, there is no vocabulary gap whatsoever — the German rendering is precise, uncontroversial, and matches the source text exactly. The gap is entirely a framing and reception gap, of the same category first identified for Philippians 4:13 (a reception gap downstream of accurate translation) but of a categorically higher severity given the documented historical consequences specifically in German history. No wording change to the translation itself can address this risk; only mandatory, explicit accompanying teaching material can.

Terms with no gap at all

• Immanuel, Lösegeld, Verklärung, Vaterunser: all precise, well-established renderings requiring no gap-filling strategy beyond the liturgical-consistency notes already documented in 05_translation_landscape.md.

Gap-filling strategy

Where Matthew presents its most severe reception gap (27:25, and to a lesser degree chapter 23), this Language Package documents the mandatory framing requirement explicitly and repeatedly across 02_cultural_context.md, 04_comparative_theology.md, and the doctrine registry, treating it as a non-optional requirement rather than a single documented caution — a stronger discipline than any other reception-gap or sensitivity-gap risk identified elsewhere in this pipeline.

Coverage confirmation

Covers linguistic-gap material relevant across chapters 3, 5, 23, and 27; the remainder of the Gospel introduces no new gap category beyond those already documented in prior German packages.