Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Linguistic Gap Analysis

06 — Linguistic Gap Analysis: Hebrews (Full Book) for Konkani

1. Purpose and Method

This analysis identifies where Devanagari-script Konkani (Bible Society of India tradition, Hindu-background-facing register, per the Romans baseline) has no natural vocabulary for a Hebrews concept (“missing vocabulary”), and where it has vocabulary that is already occupied by Goan Hindu, Goan Catholic (Romi Konkani), or general-Konkani meanings that would distort the doctrine if left unfenced (“crowded semantic neighborhoods”). It also records every transliteration-vs-paraphrase decision and ranks Hebrews’ highest-risk ambiguities. All recommendations here are consistent with, and where already adopted are cited from, 08_core_glossary.md and bible_term_registry.json — this document does not introduce any rendering that contradicts those files.

Hebrews presents a distinct gap-analysis profile from Romans: where Romans’ hardest problem was abstract soteriological vocabulary (grace, justification, righteousness), Hebrews’ hardest problem is cultic vocabulary — priesthood, sacrifice, blood, altar, purification, atonement — precisely the domain where Konkani’s available words are most heavily populated by living, still-practiced Goan Hindu ritual (yajna, puja, abhisheka, caste priesthood) rather than by dormant or purely literary associations. This raises the average risk tier of Hebrews’ new vocabulary compared to Romans.

2. Full-Book Chapter Coverage Scan

Every chapter of Hebrews has been reviewed for load-bearing terminology. Chapters contributing no new terms beyond what is already catalogued are explicitly noted as reviewed.

Ch.Load-bearing content reviewedNew/crowded terms surfaced
1Superiority of the Son over angels; radiance of glory; exact imprint; enthronement citation (Ps 2:7); firstborn; providenceगौरवाचें तेज, हुबेहूब खूण, जेष्ठ पुत्र, आयज हांव तुजो जल्म दिला, देवदूत — see §4-5
2Christ’s humanity, suffering, solidarity with “brothers”; propitiation; pioneer/founder; angels reaffirmed inferiorपापांची क्षमा मेळोवपाखातीर बलिदान करप, आरंभकर्ता
3Moses vs. Christ (servant vs. Son); apostasy warning begins; unbelief/hardened heartsविश्वासत्याग (first occurrence, 3:12); मोशे contrast argument — no new lexical item beyond reused नियमशास्त्र-adjacent household imagery
4Rest (κατάπαυσις); word of God living and active; throne of graceविसावो / शब्बाथ विसावो, देवाचें उतर जिवें आनी कार्यक्षम, कृपेचें आसन
5High priest qualifications; Melchizedek introduced; learned obedience; perfection (Christ “made perfect”)महापुरोहित, मलकीसदेक, जें तो सोसलो…आज्ञाधारकपण शिकलो, परिपूर्ण करप
6Warning against apostasy (6:4-6, most severe instance); oath; anchor; Melchizedek resumedविश्वासत्याग (Critical severity peak), शपथ, नांगर
7Levitical priesthood insufficiency; Melchizedek order; indestructible life; Christ unblemished/separated from sinnersलेवी वंशाचें पुरोहितपण, पुरोहितपण, न्हिवारपाक येनासलें जिवीत, पवित्र निर्दोष पापी मनशांपसून वेगळो केल्लो
8New covenant citation (Jer 31); old covenant “obsolete”; tabernacle as shadowनवो करार, जुनो करार, सावळी/नमुनो, निवासमंडप
9Core passage. Tabernacle furniture; Holy Place/Most Holy Place; blood; sprinkling; purification; redemption; testament/will pun; die once; salvation completed at Christ’s returnरगत, शिंपणें, शुद्धीकरण, खंडणी, वचनपत्र (gloss), एकाच खेपे मरप, पड्दो
10Sacrifices’ insufficiency vs. Christ’s single offering; sanctification vs. perfection tension; apostasy warning (10:26-31, most explicit); boldness of access; conscienceअर्पण, बलिदान, परिपूर्ण करप / पवित्रीकरण tension, धिटाईन…प्रवेश, सद्सद्विवेकबुद्धी
11Faith definition (ὑπόστασις/ἔλεγχος); roll call of OT saints; “better resurrection”खात्री, पुरावो, चड बरें पुनरुत्थान, full proper-name list (§ Section C of 08)
12Fatherly discipline; Zion/heavenly Jerusalem; unshakeable kingdom; consuming fire; firstborn (assembly)शिस्तीचें शिक्षण, सियोन/स्वर्गीय जெருसலேம், न हालपी देवाचें राज्य, भस्म करपी जाळ
13Altar (spiritual); sacrifice of praise; blood of the eternal covenant (closing doxology); great shepherdवेदी, स्तुतीचें बलिदान, सार्वकालीक कराराचें रगत, व्हड मेंढपाळ

No chapter of Hebrews is without load-bearing theological content; unlike some Pauline epistles, there is no purely administrative/greetings chapter to mark “reviewed, no new terms” in the strict sense — even chapter 13’s closing exhortations carry the fixed blood-of-the-covenant phrase. This is noted here to confirm the full-book mandate has been executed rather than silently assumed.

3. Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix

DoctrineAvailable Konkani termsWeaknesses in available vocabularyRecommended strategy
Superiority of Christ over Angelsदेवदूत (angels, reused-adjacent to baseline), गौरव, देवाचो पुत्रKonkani/regional cosmology has a dense, hierarchically-ranked category of devas/celestial beings; a bare “दूत” or unqualified “देवता” would read as one more rank within that same hierarchy rather than a categorically different, created, worshipping order.Use देवदूत (never देवता); every occurrence in ch. 1-2 must reinforce “created, serving, worshipping” status via context or note. Never let angelology stand unglossed at first occurrence.
Superiority of Christ over Mosesमोशे (established transliteration), बोलावलेले (household/calling language)No direct lexical gap; risk is argumentative, not lexical — readers must grasp “servant vs. Son” as categorical, not merely honorific, difference.No new term needed; rely on syntactic clarity (सेवक vs. पुत्र) rather than vocabulary innovation. Flag ch. 3 for native-speaker review on argument clarity, not glossary compliance.
Superiority of Christ over the Levitical Priesthoodपुरोहित, पुरोहितपण, लेवी वंशाचें पुरोहितपण (new)Crowded neighborhood: Goa’s Goud Saraswat Brahmin and other hereditary priestly castes make “पुरोहित” a live, socially loaded caste-office term, not a dormant biblical-only word.Fence with explicit hereditary/non-hereditary contrast at every occurrence (7:11-24); never let “better priesthood” reduce to “better-born priesthood” — the Melchizedek argument’s whole point is non-hereditary, indestructible-life basis.
Christ as the Great High Priestमहापुरोहित, मलकीसदेक, मध्यस्थSame caste-collision risk as above, intensified: “high priest” without qualification could be heard as simply the most senior member of a hereditary priestly lineage.महापुरोहित must never stand alone in a doctrinally load-bearing sentence; require accompanying phrase anchoring uniqueness/permanence (e.g., “सदाकाळ रावपी एकच महापुरोहित”). Escalate every occurrence to theologian review per registry.
The New Covenant versus the Oldकरार (baseline, reused), नवो करार, जुनो करार, सावळी/नमुनो, वचनपत्र (gloss)Two distinct gaps: (1) Konkani करार does not carry the Greek διαθήκη’s secondary “last will and testament activated by death” sense exploited in 9:16-17; (2) “obsolete” (जुनो, “old”) risks implying the OT Scriptures themselves are devalued, when only the covenant administration is in view.Retain करार throughout for the covenant sense (consistency with baseline); add an explanatory clause at 9:16-17 rather than a substitute term; add a standing translator note at 8:13 clarifying that covenant-administration obsolescence ≠ Scripture devaluation.
The Once-for-All Atoning Sacrificeबलिदान, अर्पण, खंडणी, पापांची क्षमा मेळोवपाखातीर बलिदान करप, एकाच खेपे मरपExtremely crowded neighborhood: यज्ञ (Vedic fire-sacrifice), होम (fire-offering), प्रायश्चित (self-performed expiation) are all live, frequently-practiced Goan Hindu ritual categories that could each individually mis-render “sacrifice.”Hard-fence बलिदान against यज्ञ/होम at every occurrence (never substitute); render propitiation as the full descriptive phrase rather than प्रायश्चित, since propitiation in Hebrews is God-provided, not sinner-performed. This is the single highest-density risk cluster in the book (see §6).
The Danger of Apostasy and Warning Passagesविश्वासत्याग (new)Gap: no single existing Konkani word cleanly names “decisive, willful defection after full exposure to truth” without either (a) importing धर्म (forbidden) or (b) sounding like ordinary “loss of faith/doubt,” which is too weak for 6:4-6 and 10:26-31’s severity.Compound coinage विश्वासत्याग (faith + abandonment) retained as the correct fence against धर्मत्याग. Flag both severe-warning passages (6:4-6; 10:26-31) for theologian review of tone/severity, not just lexical compliance.
! Faith of the Old Testament Saintsविश्वास (baseline, reused), खात्री, पुरावोGap: Hebrews 11:1’s formal definition (ὑπόστασις/ἔλεγχος) has no ready single-word Konkani pair; existing devotional vocabulary (भक्ती-adjacent terms) would wrongly shift the register from confident trust to emotive devotion.Use खात्री/निश्चितता + पुरावो/खात्रीलायक जाणीव as a fixed definitional pair, applied consistently at every 11:1 cross-reference throughout the curriculum.
Perseverance and Assuranceनांगर, शिस्तीचें शिक्षण, न हालपी देवाचें राज्यNo major lexical gap; risk is conceptual fencing against fatalistic/karmic reading of hardship-as-discipline (12:5-11), where regional idiom might default to “this suffering is your own karma coming due.”Anchor शिस्तीचें शिक्षण tightly to baseline पिता/अब्बा intimacy register — formative fatherly correction, not karmic consequence or merit-earning ascetic self-discipline.
Access to God through Christ’s Bloodरगत, पड्दो, धिटाईन/भरवशान पवित्र स्थळांत प्रवेश, कृपेचें आसन, वेदीCrowded neighborhood: blood as ritual substance is a recognized medium in Shakta-influenced folk devi-shrine practice; वेदी independently denotes a functioning Hindu yajna fire-altar.Fence रगत and वेदी at every occurrence as references to Christ’s own voluntary, historical, once-for-all self-giving — never a substance offered to appease an angry deity, never an ongoing physical altar-ritual.

4. Missing Vocabulary (Genuine Lexical Gaps)

These concepts have no existing Konkani word or phrase and required coinage or compound construction (already reflected in 08_core_glossary.md; this section records the underlying gap-reasoning):

ConceptGap descriptionSolution adopted
Apostasy (decisive post-illumination defection)No single word distinguishes this from ordinary doubt or from धर्म-based “religious abandonment”Compound coinage विश्वासत्याग
Propitiation (God-provided, not sinner-performed)Nearest available word (प्रायश्चित) has the opposite agency structureFull descriptive clause पापांची क्षमा मेळोवपाखातीर बलिदान करप
Testament/will pun (διαθήκη’s legal-will sense)करार cannot carry “will activated by the testator’s death”Contextual gloss वचनपत्र + explanatory clause, flagged as exegetical expansion
Perfection/perfecter (τελειόω-family, completed gift not attained state)Nearest available words (सिद्ध-family) denote self-attained yogic/ascetic perfectionDescriptive verb-phrase परिपूर्ण करप, never सिद्ध
”Today I have begotten you” (enthronement, not origin)No idiomatic Konkani rendering distinguishes declarative/enthronement language from a literal birth-in-time statementLiteral rendering आयज हांव तुजो जल्म दिला + mandatory translator note
”Die once” (structural anti-reincarnation claim)No natural Konkani phrase carries this polemical force without added explanationPlain रendering एकाच खेपे मरप + mandatory translator note distinguishing from rebirth
Indestructible life / permanent priesthoodNo existing single term for “unending, unbroken life” distinct from cyclical-immortality-through-rebirth notionsDescriptive phrase न्हिवारपाक येनासलें जिवीत
Radiance of glory / exact imprint (co-essential deity)No existing phrase conveys ontological co-essence without collapsing into honorific light-imageryCompound descriptive phrase गौरवाचें तेज / देवाच्या स्वरूपाची हुबेहूब खूण, tightly bound to baseline गौरव

5. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods Requiring Fencing

These concepts DO have ready Konkani words, but those words are already occupied by competing meanings from Goan Hindu practice, Goan Catholic Romi Konkani tradition, or general secular usage, and therefore require explicit fencing (context markers, translator notes, or consistent avoidance of the competing term) rather than substitution:

Konkani word/rootCompeting occupied meaningDoctrine at riskFencing strategy
यज्ञ / होमVedic fire-sacrifice performed by Brahmin priests for merit/cosmic order — live, frequent Goan Hindu ritual practiceOnce-for-All Atoning SacrificeFORBIDDEN outright; always बलिदान, always anchored as unique historical self-giving
प्रायश्चितSelf-performed penance/expiation (fasting, pilgrimage) undertaken BY the sinnerOnce-for-All Atoning Sacrifice (propitiation)FORBIDDEN; use full descriptive clause reversing agency to God
अभिषेकRitual sprinkling/anointing of a deity image (e.g., a Shiva liṅga)Access to God through Christ’s Blood (sprinkling, 9:13,19,21; 10:22; 12:24)FORBIDDEN; use शिंपणें, which lacks the image-consecration association
वेदीA functioning Hindu yajna fire-altar, still physically present in Goan temple courtyardsAccess to God through Christ’s Blood (13:10)Retained but must carry explicit metaphorical marker every occurrence — “the altar we have,” referring to Christ’s finished sacrifice, never a physical ritual site
सिद्ध / सिद्धीA yogic/ascetic adept who attains supernatural powers or liberation through disciplined practiceChrist as Great High Priest; Once-for-All Sacrifice (perfection)FORBIDDEN outright for τελειόω-family; use परिपूर्ण करप exclusively
सनातनSelf-designation of Hinduism itself (“Sanātana Dharma”)Once-for-All Sacrifice; New Covenant (eternal)FORBIDDEN; use सार्वकालीक exclusively
मुक्ती / मोक्षRelease from the cycle of rebirth (samsara) through devotional or ascetic effortSalvation; Redemption; RestFORBIDDEN for both तारण and खंडणी and विसावो; all three require explicit relational, not liberationist, framing
धर्मCosmic/social duty, caste-linked religious orderRighteousness; Law; Apostasy (धर्मत्याग rejected)FORBIDDEN across all Hebrews doctrine uses, consistent with Romans baseline
देवता (unqualified)A worshipped deity/celestial being within Hindu devotional hierarchySuperiority of Christ over AngelsNever used for “angels”; देवदूत retained and reinforced as created/serving/worshipping, not worshipped
संतVarkari bhakti-poet devotional tradition (Tukaram, Namdev, etc.)Faith of the OT Saints; SainthoodContinue baseline avoidance; पवित्र जन used for corporate believer-sainthood, and OT “saints/faithful” language in ch. 11 must also avoid संत to prevent conflating OT exemplars with the regional poet-saint category
व्रत / संकल्पPersonal Hindu devotional vow undertaken by a devoteeFaith of OT Saints (Oath, 6:16-17; 7:20-21)FORBIDDEN for God’s self-oath; शपथ reserved for God’s own binding self-oath, never a human ritual vow
अग्नि / भस्म-अग्नि associationsAgni as a revered fire-deity central to yajna, independently veneratedConsuming fire (12:29)भस्म करपी जाळ retained but must be explicitly tied to God’s holiness/judgment against sin in context, never left to stand as an allusion to fire-deity veneration
गुरूGuru-disciple religious authority structure, prominent in regional Hindu practiceApostleship-adjacent (Mediator, High Priest, Founder/Pioneer)Already forbidden in Romans baseline for “apostle”; extended here to महापुरोहित, मध्यस्थ, and आरंभकर्ता — none of these may be rendered or glossed with गुरू
इगोर्ज़ / वांजेल / जेजू (Romi Konkani forms)Settled Goan Catholic Portuguese-loanword vocabulary, out of script/register scope(register boundary, not doctrinal)Continue baseline policy: acknowledge existence in landscape documentation only; never mix into this Devanagari-register glossary

6. Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions

TermDecisionRationale
MelchizedekTransliterate: मलकीसदेकProper name central to a typological argument (chs. 5-7); no paraphrase is possible or desirable, but requires an explanatory footnote establishing his unique Genesis 14 appearance and strictly typological function, to prevent assimilation to local mythic priest-king figures
Messiah / ChristTransliterate: मसीहा (title contexts) / ख्रिस्त (proper-name contexts)Consistent with Romans baseline transliteration table; no paraphrase attempted
AbbaTransliterate: अब्बाRetained per baseline for filial-intimacy register, though not directly cited in Hebrews’ Greek text; used tonally for cross-reference with 12:5-11
Amen, Hallelujah-type termsTransliterate (established forms)Per AI requirements transliteration table; no Hebrews-specific instance in this book beyond closing benedictions, but policy applies
Zion / heavenly JerusalemTransliterate: सियोन / स्वर्गीय जெருसলேம்Proper geographic/theological names; paraphrase would lose the OT resonance; requires background note given low assumed OT narrative literacy
PropitiationParaphrase: पापांची क्षमा मेळोवपाखातीर बलिदान करपNo single Konkani word carries the God-provided, wrath-turning-aside sense without collapsing into human-performed प्रायश्चित; full descriptive clause required
Justification-adjacent apostasyParaphrase-avoided, coinage instead: विश्वासत्यागNeither transliteration nor an existing paraphrase was adequate; a compound coinage from two already-established roots (विश्वास + त्याग) was preferred over either loanword transliteration or a multi-clause paraphrase, for reading-level and memorability reasons
Testament/will pun (9:16-17)Paraphrase with explanatory clause; करार retained, वचनपत्र offered only as contextual glossTransliterating διαθήκη itself would abandon the established करार consistency; a bare paraphrase substitute risks losing the covenant sense elsewhere; the compromise is to keep करार and add a one-time clarifying clause at the pun’s location
”Today I have begotten you”Literal rendering, not paraphrase: आयज हांव तुजो जल्म दिलाThis is a direct OT citation (Ps 2:7) reused verbatim in the argument; loose paraphrase would obscure the intertextual link. Literal rendering + mandatory translator note carries the enthronement sense without inventing new vocabulary
Perfection (τελειόω)Paraphrase: परिपूर्ण करपDeliberate avoidance of both transliteration (meaningless to readers) and the tempting single-word सिद्ध paraphrase (doctrinally dangerous); a descriptive verb-phrase was judged safest
High Priest / Priest / PriesthoodNeither transliterated nor paraphrased broadly — existing Konkani words retained (महापुरोहित, पुरोहित, पुरोहितपण)These concepts are not absent from Konkani (unlike Melchizedek or propitiation); the risk is not lexical gap but semantic crowding, so the correct strategy is fencing (§5), not transliteration or invented paraphrase
Sacrifice / Blood / AltarExisting Konkani words retained (बलिदान, रगत, वेदी) with mandatory fencingSame logic as above: the words exist and are the established Christian-tradition renderings; the task is contextual anchoring, not lexical innovation

7. Ranked List of Highest-Risk Ambiguities in Hebrews

Ranked by combined severity of doctrinal consequence and probability of confusion given Goa’s specific religious landscape:

  1. महापुरोहित (High Priest) left unanchored — risk of being heard as “the most senior member of a hereditary Brahmin priestly lineage” rather than Christ’s unique, non-hereditary, permanent office. Highest-frequency Critical term in the book (2:17–10:21). Mitigation: mandatory anchoring phrase at every occurrence; theologian review required.

  2. बलिदान/रगत/वेदी cluster left unanchored — the single densest collision zone in the book, because Goa’s Hindu ritual practice (yajna, blood-medium devi worship, functioning fire-altars) is a lived, physically present, currently practiced reality, not dormant background, unlike some other risk categories in the Romans baseline. Mitigation: every occurrence in chs. 9–10, 13 requires explicit “once-for-all, Christ’s own voluntary self-giving” framing.

  3. विश्वासत्याग severity calibration (6:4-6; 10:26-31) — risk of either softening the warning (implying easy restoration) or overstating it (implying salvation can be lost by minor lapses) in a way not fully controlled by lexical choice alone; this is an interpretive/tonal risk layered on top of the lexical coinage. Mitigation: theologian review of these two passages specifically, beyond ordinary glossary compliance.

  4. परिपूर्ण करप (perfection) vs. सिद्ध-family intrusion — nine occurrences across the book; any translator or reviewer unfamiliar with the forbidden-term policy could reflexively reach for सिद्ध as the “obvious” Konkani word for perfection, silently reintroducing yogic-attainment theology. Mitigation: standing translator note attached to every occurrence, per bible_term_registry.json.

  5. विसावो/शब्बाथ विसावो (rest) drifting toward मोक्ष/मुक्ती’s semantic field — chs. 3-4’s “entering rest” language is lexically and thematically adjacent to liberation-from-striving vocabulary already forbidden elsewhere; the risk is subtler here because no single forbidden word is being substituted, but the surrounding argument’s shape (ceasing from one’s own works) closely parallels moksha-seeking logic. Mitigation: explicit relational-rest framing at every occurrence (3:11-19; 4:1-11).

  6. देवदूत (angels) collapsing into देवता-hierarchy thinking — chapter 1’s entire rhetorical argument (Son superior to angels) is weakened if readers default to hearing “angels” as simply lower-ranked devas within a populated celestial hierarchy they already hold, rather than categorically different created/worshipping beings. Mitigation: reinforce created/serving/non-worshipped status at 1:4-14 and 2:2-9.

  7. मलकीसदेक assimilation to local mythic priest-king narrative — a proper name with no natural Konkani equivalent is inherently vulnerable to being domesticated into a locally familiar category (divine-king, avatar-adjacent figure) absent an explanatory footnote. Mitigation: mandatory footnote at first occurrence (5:6) establishing the Genesis 14 typological function.

  8. आयज हांव तुजो जल्म दिला misread as literal origin-in-time — without the mandatory translator note, this citation (1:5; 5:5) could be read as contradicting the Critical Sonship-of-Christ doctrine it is meant to support. Mitigation: note required at both occurrences, not just the first.

  9. लेवी वंशाचें पुरोहितपण (Levitical priesthood) reduced to “a lesser lineage” rather than “a categorically superseded order” — readers in a caste-conscious context may naturally hear ch. 7’s argument as “Christ has better ancestry” rather than “Christ’s priesthood is of an entirely different, non-hereditary kind.” Mitigation: explicit hereditary/non-hereditary contrast language required at 7:11-24.

  10. एकाच खेपे मरप (die once) read as merely narrative rather than doctrinal — without its mandatory note, 9:27 could pass as an incidental observation rather than the book’s direct, structural rebuttal of the rebirth framework. Mitigation: standing translator note, flagged for theologian review per registry.

  11. कृपेचें आसन (throne of grace) losing either its royal-authority or its gracious-access half — a translator under space pressure might compress this to कृपा alone (losing royal access) or आसन alone (losing gracious welcome); both halves are required (4:16). Mitigation: native-speaker review of this compound at its point of use.

  12. वचनपत्र gloss at 9:16-17 overreaching into a general-purpose substitute for करार — if a translator generalizes this contextual gloss beyond its single flagged location, it would fracture the otherwise-consistent करार rendering used everywhere else in the book. Mitigation: explicit scope restriction — वचनपत्र may appear only as a bracketed clarifying gloss at 9:16-17, nowhere else.

  13. धिटाईन/भरवशान पवित्र स्थळांत प्रवेश (confident access) read as presumption rather than confidence — Konkani register conventions around addressing the divine formally could push a translator toward a more hesitant phrasing that undercuts 10:19-22’s deliberately bold invitation. Mitigation: native-speaker review for register/tone, not just lexical accuracy.

  14. इस्राएल/दावीद/मोशे consistency drift across Hebrews vs. Romans — because these proper names already carry established Romans-baseline spellings, any Hebrews-specific worker unaware of the shared translation memory could introduce spelling variants. Mitigation: pre-flight loading of the shared translation_memory.json, per the AI requirements document, applies without modification here.


This document supplies the gap-analysis rationale underlying 08_core_glossary.md’s term decisions for Hebrews and must be read alongside it. No rendering recorded here departs from, or is intended to override, any decision already recorded in 08_core_glossary.md, bible_term_registry.json, or the Romans baseline translation_memory.json.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words