Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis: Ephesians (Full Book) — Koine Greek Source Analysis for Maithili

Method Note

This analysis follows the baseline Romans Language Package for Maithili as binding authority. Every term already recorded in translation_memory.json/bible_term_registry.json (gospel, grace, faith, righteousness, justification, salvation, apostle, called/calling, holy, saints, sanctification, adoption, resurrection, lord, son of God, incarnation, peace, spiritual gifts, thanksgiving, fellowship, church, kingdom of God, law, sin, gentiles, glory, obedience of faith, power of God, messiah, prophet, prophecy, covenant, election, intercession, providence, mission, David, Israel, Jesus, God, Holy Spirit, Father, Abba, exhort, seed of David, imputed righteousness) is reused exactly, without re-derivation, wherever it recurs in Ephesians. Only new terms and new senses introduced by Ephesians receive fresh rendering proposals here, and every proposal is checked against the same class of syncretism risk the baseline documents (karma-merit worldview, Ram-Sita/Krishna Vaishnava devotion, Shakta goddess-power associations, Panjikaran lineage-purity culture, monastic math institutions, cyclical yuga cosmology, and Mithila’s own folk-religious practices of spirit-affliction and exorcism).

Ephesians introduces a distinct new cluster of risk: (1) the “mystery” vocabulary central to chs. 1–3, colliding with Mithila’s active Tantric-esoteric tradition (the regionally significant Ugratara shrine, Nath-yogi siddha traditions); (2) sustained principality/authority/spiritual-warfare vocabulary (ch. 1, 3, 6) colliding with the still-living Ojha exorcist tradition and folk belief in bhoot-pret (troublesome spirits) placated or controlled through mantra and ritual; (3) household-code vocabulary (ch. 5–6) intersecting Mithila’s strong patriarchal family-order and caste-linked occupational-name customs; and (4) the “church as temple/body” metaphor cluster, which risks re-opening the baseline’s settled मन्दिर-exclusion for “church” if handled carelessly.


PART A — Core Passage: Ephesians 2:1–10 (Verse-by-Verse)

Ephesians 2:1

Greek: Καὶ ὑμᾶς ὄντας νεκροὺς τοῖς παραπτώμασιν καὶ ταῖς ἁμαρτίαις ὑμῶν

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
deadνεκρός (nekros)corpse, lifelessphysically dead; metaphorically spiritually lifeless, unresponsivedead, deadnessTotal spiritual deadness toward God prior to grace — not a diminished capacity but complete inabilityमृत (mṛt). Medium risk: must read as spiritual deadness (inability to respond to God), not merely moral weakness; avoid terms suggesting a dormant “spark” awaiting self-effort to revive, which would echo a karma-merit self-improvement frame.
trespassesπαράπτωμα (paraptōma)a fall beside, a false stepspecific acts of wrongdoing, transgressiontrespasses, transgressions, offensesConcrete acts of sin, paired with the general state (ἁμαρτία)अपराध (aparādh). Low-Medium risk: distinguish from general पाप (sin, baseline) — used together they cover both specific acts and the underlying condition.
sinsἁμαρτία (hamartia)missing the markmoral failure before a personal GodsinsReuse from baseline TMपाप (pāp) — REUSE baseline exactly, High risk per baseline notes (distinguish from ritual impurity/karma).

Ephesians 2:2

Greek: ἐν αἷς ποτε περιεπατήσατε κατὰ τὸν αἰῶνα τοῦ κόσμου τούτου, κατὰ τὸν ἄρχοντα τῆς ἐξουσίας τοῦ ἀέρος, τοῦ πνεύματος τοῦ νῦν ἐνεργοῦντος ἐν τοῖς υἱοῖς τῆς ἀπειθείας

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
walkedπεριπατέω (peripateō)to walk aroundto conduct one’s life, habitual conductwalked, lived, conducted yourselvesThe whole pattern of pre-conversion lifeचलब/आचरण करब (calab/ācaraṇ karab). Low risk, standard idiom for “way of life” already natural in Maithili.
age/course of this worldαἰών τοῦ κόσμου τούτου (aiōn tou kosmou toutou)age, world-ordera bounded era; the present fallen order of thingscourse, age, present world-systemThe dominant spirit/pattern of the fallen present order, NOT a cyclical cosmic eraCRITICAL/HIGH RISK. αἰών is regularly rendered युग (yug) in North Indian religious registers, but युग is the Hindu cosmological term for the four cyclical ages (Satya, Tretā, Dvāpar, Kali Yuga) through which the cosmos repeatedly passes — a framework very much alive in Mithila’s Puranic literacy. Proposed rendering: “ई संसारक वर्तमान ढाँचा” (this world’s present order/pattern) rather than युग, to avoid activating yuga-cycle cosmology. Where युग must be used elsewhere in the book (see ch. 1, 3), a distinguishing translator note is REQUIRED every occurrence, on the same footing as देहधारण/अवतार.
ruler of the power of the airἄρχων τῆς ἐξουσίας τοῦ ἀέρος (archōn tēs exousias tou aeros)ruler, one having authority, of the airSatan as a personal, organized spiritual authority over a fallen domainprince of the power of the air, ruler of the atmospheric domainIntroduces the Spiritual Warfare doctrine — a personal, singular, defeated-yet-active adversary, distinct from Mithila’s many localized bhoot-pret / folk evil spirits placated by an OjhaHIGH/CRITICAL RISK. Proposed: “आकाशक अधिकार रखनिहार शासक” (the ruler holding authority over the air). Must NOT be assimilated to a generic troublesome spirit (भूत-प्रेत) subject to mantra-control; this is the personal devil (शैतान, see ch. 6) exercising organized dominion, opposed only through Christ, never through Ojha-style ritual counter-measures.
spirit now at workπνεῦμα τὸ νῦν ἐνεργοῦν (pneuma to nyn energoun)spirit now energizing/workingan active animating influencespirit now at workThe devil’s animating influence in unbelief, contrasted with the Holy Spirit’s animating work in believers (ch. 1, 4)HIGH RISK. Reuse आत्मा for “spirit” but with lower-case sense (not पवित्र आत्मा); propose “अहिना काज करएबला आत्मा”. Must not read as an impersonal cosmic energy (parallel to the ब्रह्म/परमात्मा caution already in baseline for the Holy Spirit) — this is a personal evil influence, not diffuse “energy.”
sons of disobedienceυἱοὶ τῆς ἀπειθείας (huioi tēs apeitheias)sons/children characterized by disobediencea Hebraic idiom for people characterized by a qualitysons of disobedience, the disobedientDescribes unbelieving humanity’s fundamental orientationअवज्ञाक सन्तान (avajñāk santān). Medium risk — must retain the strong idiom (characterized-by, not merely “who disobey occasionally”).

Ephesians 2:3

Greek: ἐν οἷς καὶ ἡμεῖς πάντες ἀνεστράφημέν ποτε ἐν ταῖς ἐπιθυμίαις τῆς σαρκὸς ἡμῶν, ποιοῦντες τὰ θελήματα τῆς σαρκὸς καὶ τῶν διανοιῶν, καὶ ἤμεθα τέκνα φύσει ὀργῆς ὡς καὶ οἱ λοιποί

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
passions/desires of the fleshἐπιθυμίαι τῆς σαρκός (epithymiai tēs sarkos)desires of the fleshdisordered cravings rooted in fallen human naturelusts, desires, passions of the fleshUniversal human bondage to sinful appetite prior to graceदेहक अभिलाषा (dehak abhilāṣā). Medium risk: keep देह/शरीर consistent with established देहधारण root but ensure “flesh” here reads as fallen moral nature, not the neutral physical body.
desires of body and mindθελήματα τῆς σαρκὸς καὶ τῶν διανοιῶν (thelēmata tēs sarkos kai tōn dianoiōn)wills of flesh and of thoughtsvolitional and cognitive dimensions of sindesires of body and mind, will of the flesh and sensesSin affects both appetite and intellect — total depravityदेह आ मनक इच्छा (deh ā manak icchā). Low-Medium risk.
children of wrathτέκνα ὀργῆς (tekna orgēs)children of wratha Hebraic idiom: those under God’s judicial angerchildren of wrath, deserving wrathHumanity’s just standing under divine judgment prior to graceHIGH RISK. Proposed: “क्रोधक सन्तान” (krodhak santān). परमेश्वरक क्रोध (God’s wrath) must be conveyed as a personal, moral, judicial response to sin — not an impersonal karmic consequence (कर्मफल, already rejected in baseline for “grace”) and not a capricious deity’s temper as sometimes depicted in Puranic narrative.
by natureφύσει (physei)by nature, nativelyinherent condition, not merely acquired habitby nature, naturallySin is an inherited condition of the human race, not only individual actsस्वभावसँ (svabhāvasã̃). Low risk.

Ephesians 2:4

Greek: ὁ δὲ θεὸς πλούσιος ὢν ἐν ἐλέει, διὰ τὴν πολλὴν ἀγάπην αὐτοῦ ἣν ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
rich in mercyπλούσιος ἐν ἐλέει (plousios en eleei)rich in mercyabundant compassion toward those deserving judgmentrich in mercy, abounding in mercyThe turning point of the passage: God’s initiative, not human meritदयामे धनी (dayāme dhanī). Medium risk: दया (mercy/compassion) may be used here per baseline note (“कृपा may be used for ordinary compassion in non-salvific contexts only” — मर्सी/दया is acceptable here as compassion-toward-the-guilty, distinct from अनुग्रह which names the unmerited-favor gift itself in v.5, v.8).
great loveπολλὴ ἀγάπη (pollē agapē)much/great loveGod’s self-originating covenant lovegreat love, love wherewith he loved usThe ground of salvation is God’s own character, not human loveliness earning itNew term — प्रेम (prem), HIGH doctrinal weight though Medium translation risk. Must be distinguished from काम (romantic/sensual desire) and kept distinct from भक्ति-style devotional love directed by a worshipper toward a deity (baseline’s caution on faith/भक्ति applies analogously: here it is God’s love moving toward humanity, not humanity’s devotional love reaching up).

Ephesians 2:5

Greek: καὶ ὄντας ἡμᾶς νεκροὺς τοῖς παραπτώμασιν συνεζωοποίησεν τῷ Χριστῷ — χάριτί ἐστε σεσῳσμένοι

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
made us alive together with Christσυζωοποιέω (syzōopoieō)to make alive together withresurrection-life given jointly with Christ’s own resurrectionmade alive together, quickened togetherBelievers’ new life is not self-generated but is a share in Christ’s own resurrection lifeख्रीष्टक संग जीवित कएल (Khrīṣṭak saṅg jīvit kael). HIGH RISK: must be kept sharply distinct from पुनर्जन्म (reincarnation — forbidden per baseline) even though the English “made alive” could tempt a rebirth-flavored gloss; this is participation in Christ’s resurrection (पुनरुत्थान, reuse baseline), a once-for-all event, not a repeatable rebirth.
by grace you have been savedχάριτί ἐστε σεσῳσμένοι (chariti este sesōsmenoi)by grace you are having-been-savedperfect passive: a completed act with continuing results, received not achievedby grace you have been saved, saved by graceTHE thesis statement of the whole doctrine of Salvation by Grace through Faith — reused verbatim in v.8अनुग्रहसँ तोहर उद्धार भेल छौ — REUSE अनुग्रह (grace) and उद्धार (salvation) exactly per baseline TM, both Critical/High risk terms. CRITICAL: the perfect-passive force (“has been saved,” a settled fact, not an ongoing uncertain process) must be preserved in the Maithili verb form to avoid reading as provisional or process-only salvation vulnerable to a karmic “still working it out” framing.

Ephesians 2:6

Greek: καὶ συνήγειρεν καὶ συνεκάθισεν ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
raised us up with himσυνεγείρω (synegeirō)to raise up together withshared resurrection status, already accomplished in union with Christraised us up with himBelievers’ definitive new standing, secured in Christ’s own resurrectionओकर संग उठाओल (okar saṅg uṭhāol), built on पुनरुत्थान root. High risk, same reincarnation-avoidance caution as v.5.
seated us with him in the heavenly placesσυνεκάθισεν ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις (synekathisen en tois epouraniois)seated together in the heavenliespresent positional authority/status shared with the enthroned Christseated us with him in heavenly placesBelievers already share Christ’s exalted authority — a present reality, not merely future hopeHIGH RISK — ἐπουράνιος (“heavenly places”). Proposed: स्वर्गीय स्थान (svargīya sthān). Must carry a translator note distinguishing this from स्वर्ग (Svarga), the Puranic temporary heavenly abode earned by accumulated merit before an eventual return to the rebirth cycle. Ephesians’ “heavenly places” names Christ’s present reign and the arena of spiritual conflict (cf. ch. 1:20-21, 3:10, 6:12), not a merit-earned resting place between lives.

Ephesians 2:7

Greek: ἵνα ἐνδείξηται ἐν τοῖς αἰῶσιν τοῖς ἐπερχομένοις τὸ ὑπερβάλλον πλοῦτος τῆς χάριτος αὐτοῦ ἐν χρηστότητι ἐφ’ ἡμᾶς ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
ages to comeαἰῶσιν τοῖς ἐπερχομένοις (aiōsin tois eperchomenois)the coming agesfuture eras of linear, forward-moving historyages to come, coming agesGod’s grace will be displayed across all future history — linear, not cyclicalSame HIGH/CRITICAL युग-caution as 2:2. Propose “आबएबला समयसभ” (the times/ages to come) rather than आबएबला युगसभ, to keep clear of yuga-cycle cosmology.
immeasurable riches of his graceὑπερβάλλον πλοῦτος τῆς χάριτος (hyperballon ploutos tēs charitos)surpassing riches of gracesuperlative abundanceimmeasurable/incomparable/surpassing riches of graceGrace is not a single gift but an inexhaustible storeअनुग्रहक अपार वैभव (anugrahak apār vaibhav) — REUSE अनुग्रह exactly; वैभव (riches/abundance) new term, Low risk.
kindnessχρηστότης (chrēstotēs)usefulness, goodnessbenevolent disposition, gentlenesskindness, graciousnessGod’s kindly disposition displayed toward undeserving peopleकृपालुता/भलमनसाहत (kṛpālutā). Low-Medium risk — distinct from अनुग्रह; this names God’s disposition, not the saving gift itself.

Ephesians 2:8

Greek: τῇ γὰρ χάριτί ἐστε σεσῳσμένοι διὰ πίστεως· καὶ τοῦτο οὐκ ἐξ ὑμῶν, θεοῦ τὸ δῶρον

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
by grace … through faithχάριτι … διὰ πίστεως (chariti … dia pisteōs)by grace, through faiththe instrumental means (faith) by which the ground (grace) is receivedby grace through faithTHE central formula of the whole curriculum’s core doctrineREUSE अनुग्रह + विश्वास exactly, both Critical/High per baseline. CRITICAL: this pairing must render identically every time it recurs across the curriculum (cf. AI requirements doc’s cross-document consistency rule for Romans 1:16-17/10:9-10 — Ephesians 2:8 deserves the same fixed, verbatim-consistent rendering status).
not of yourselvesοὐκ ἐξ ὑμῶν (ouk ex hymōn)not from youexplicit denial of human originationnot of yourselves, not from youDirectly excludes any human-originated merit, devotion, or self-effort as the source of salvationतोहरासँ नहि (tohrāsã̃ nahi). HIGH RISK companion clause to grace/works contrast — must be rendered with unambiguous force, since this is the very clause a karma-merit or bhakti-merit reading would most want to soften.
the gift of Godθεοῦ τὸ δῶρον (theou to dōron)of-God the gifta freely given, unearned presentthe gift of God, God’s giftSalvation itself named explicitly as gift, reinforcing v.5’s grace-languageNew term — दान/उपहार. Propose परमेश्वरक उपहार (parameśvarak upahār). Medium-High risk: उपहार (gift/present) must not be confused with वरदान (boon granted by a deity in response to austerity or devotion — already flagged in baseline for “spiritual gifts”); here the point is precisely that it is NOT a response to devotion or effort.

Ephesians 2:9

Greek: οὐκ ἐξ ἔργων, ἵνα μή τις καυχήσηται

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
not of worksοὐκ ἐξ ἔργων (ouk ex ergōn)not from workshuman effort/merit-based deedsnot of works, not by worksDirect exclusion of works-righteousness as the ground of salvation — the single most important grace/works contrast clause in the whole curriculumNew term — कर्म/काज. Propose काज (deeds/works) over कर्म. CRITICAL RISK: कर्म is the loaded Sanskrit-shared term for the entire karma-causality worldview (moral cause-effect governing rebirth) common to Maithil Vaishnava and Shaiva practice alike; काज is the more neutral native Maithili word for “deed/work” and avoids triggering the karma-doctrine frame directly. This clause must be flagged for mandatory human theologian review per the AI requirements doc’s grace-works escalation rule.
so that no one may boastἵνα μή τις καυχήσηται (hina mē tis kauchēsētai)so that no one might boastpurpose clause forbidding self-congratulationso no one can boast, lest anyone should boastSalvation structured specifically to exclude self-congratulation over one’s own merit or devotionNew term — घमण्ड करब (ghamaṇḍ karab, “to boast/be proud”). HIGH RISK: this is the passage’s climactic anti-merit statement; must not be softened into mere modesty-etiquette but retained as a hard theological exclusion of merit-based boasting, directly relevant to a bhakti-devotional culture that can quietly valorize demonstrated devotional achievement (cf. baseline’s Sita-exemplar caution under “grace”).

Ephesians 2:10

Greek: αὐτοῦ γάρ ἐσμεν ποίημα, κτισθέντες ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ ἐπὶ ἔργοις ἀγαθοῖς, οἷς προητοίμασεν ὁ θεὸς ἵνα ἐν αὐτοῖς περιπατήσωμεν

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
his workmanshipαὐτοῦ ποίημα (autou poiēma)his making/creationa crafted product, something madeworkmanship, handiwork, masterpieceBelievers are the result of God’s creative act, not self-made achieversNew term — रचना (racnā, “creation/handiwork”). Medium risk: must read as God’s creative act upon the believer, not a believer’s own accomplished spiritual attainment (a subtle but real risk given the region’s siddha/spiritual-attainment vocabulary — see ch. 4 note on ἀνὴρ τέλειος).
created in Christ Jesusκτισθέντες ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ (ktisthentes en Christō Iēsou)having been created in Christ Jesusa new act of divine creation, located “in Christ”created in Christ JesusEchoes Genesis creation language applied to new spiritual existenceख्रीष्ट यीशुमे सृजित/बनाओल (Khrīṣṭ Yīśume sṛjit/banāol). Medium risk, straightforward.
for good worksἐπὶ ἔργοις ἀγαθοῖς (epi ergois agathois)upon/for good worksthe intended fruit and purpose of salvation, NOT its ground (contrast v.9)for good works, unto good worksGood works are the necessary consequence of grace, never its cause — the hinge of the entire passageनीक काजक हेतु (nīk kājak hetu). CRITICAL: the sequence of vv.8-10 (not of works → for good works) must be preserved with perfect clarity in Maithili syntax so the causal order (grace produces works, works never produce grace) cannot be reversed or blurred in translation or in reader perception.
which God prepared beforehandοἷς προητοίμασεν ὁ θεός (hois proētoimasen ho theos)which he prepared beforeGod’s prior sovereign planning of the believer’s good workswhich God prepared beforehand, foreordainedContinues the Election/Predestination theme from ch. 1 into ethical lifeपहिनहिं तैयार कएल (pahinahĩ taiyār kael). High risk — same प्रारब्ध/भाग्य-avoidance caution as election/predestination terms in ch. 1 (see below): this is personal divine intentionality, not impersonal fate.
that we should walk in themἵνα ἐν αὐτοῖς περιπατήσωμεν (hina en autois peripatēsōmen)that we might walk in themthe “walk” (περιπατέω) metaphor for lived Christian conduct, recurring throughout Ephesians (2:2, 4:1, 4:17, 5:2, 5:8, 5:15)that we should walk in themIntroduces the “Walking in Newness of Life” doctrine that structures chs. 4-6ताहिमे चलब (tāhime calab), reusing चलब/आचरण from v.2. Low risk but note the deliberate literary contrast: “walked” in death (2:2) vs. “walk” in good works (2:10) — this contrast should be preserved with the same root verb in Maithili across both verses.

PART B — Chapter-by-Chapter Study of the Whole Book

Chapter 1 (Ephesians 1:1-23)

Chapter 1 introduces the Election/Predestination doctrine, the Mystery of Christ, and a dense cluster of power-vocabulary and heavenly-realm language that recurs throughout the book.

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
blessed (God)/blessingεὐλογητός / εὐλογία (eulogētos / eulogia)well-spoken-of / a speaking-well-ofpraise directed to God / spiritual benefit given by Godblessed be God / every spiritual blessingOpens the letter’s praise; “every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places” frames the whole chapterधन्य / आशीष (dhanya / āśīṣ). Medium risk: आशीष/आशीर्वाद is the standard word for a blessing given by elders, gurus, or deities in Hindu practice; retain but require a clarifying phrase (“आत्मिक आशीष,” spiritual blessing) so it is not read as a generic guru/deity blessing exchange.
chose us / electionἐξελέξατο (exelexato), cf. ἐκλογήto pick out, selectGod’s sovereign choice of particular peoplechose, electedReuse baseline’s “election” doctrine (परमेश्वरक चुनाव)REUSE परमेश्वरक चुनाव exactly, High risk per baseline.
predestinedπροορίζω (proorizō)to mark out/determine beforehandGod’s prior sovereign determination of an outcomepredestined, foreordained, predeterminedEphesians’ signature doctrine (1:5, 1:11): God’s prior determination to adopt believers as sonsCRITICAL — NEW TERM. Proposed: “पहिनहिं ठहराओल जाएब” (pahinahĩ ṭharāol jāeb, “to have been determined/settled beforehand”), built on the same native passive-construction pattern as baseline’s “called”/“calling” (बजाओल/बजाओल जाएब) for family consistency. MUST NEVER be rendered with प्रारब्ध, भाग्य, or किस्मत (fate/destiny/karma-determined outcome) — this is the single highest-risk NEW term in Ephesians ch. 1, since “predestination” language is exceptionally vulnerable to collapsing into the fatalistic idiom already deeply embedded in everyday Maithili religious speech (cf. baseline’s caution on “election” and “providence”). Requires mandatory theologian review at every occurrence (1:5, 1:11).
adoptionυἱοθεσία (huiothesia)placement as sonfull inheritance sonshipadoption as sonsDirectly tied to predestination in 1:5REUSE पुत्रत्व प्रदान exactly, High risk per baseline.
the Belovedἠγαπημένος (ēgapēmenos)the one having been lovedChrist as the object of the Father’s eternal lovethe Beloved, his beloved SonGrace is given “in the Beloved” — union with the SonNew term — प्रियतम (priyatam, “the most beloved one”). Medium risk: must clearly denote Christ the eternal Son, not evoke the “priya”/beloved-devotee vocabulary of Krishna-bhakti poetry (e.g., Radha as priya).
redemption / forgivenessἀπολύτρωσις / ἄφεσις (apolytrōsis / aphesis)a releasing by payment / a sending awayransom-deliverance / release from guiltredemption / forgiveness of trespassesRedemption “through his blood” (1:7) — the price of deliveranceछुटकारा (chuṭkārā) for redemption — per baseline’s explicit note that छुटकारा is permitted “in specific rescue-narrative contexts,” which this is. क्षमा (kṣamā) for forgiveness — Low-Medium risk, standard.
blood (of Christ)αἷμα (haima)bloodthe price/means of atonementhis blood, blood of ChristRedemption’s price; recurs 1:7, 2:13HIGH RISK — लहू (lahū). Must be clearly distinguished from the animal-blood sacrifice (बलि) offered at regional Shakta goddess shrines (e.g., the Ugratara shrine) to appease or petition a deity. Christ’s blood is a once-for-all, self-given atoning sacrifice of love, not a ritual offering that manipulates divine favor. Flag for theologian review alongside “sacrifice” in ch. 5.
mysteryμυστήριον (mystērion)a secret, hidden thinga previously hidden divine plan now openly disclosed to allmystery, secretCentral Ephesians doctrine: “mystery of his will” (1:9), later “mystery of Christ” (3:4), “mystery of the gospel” (6:19)CRITICAL — NEW TERM. Proposed: भेद (bhed, “a hidden/distinguishing matter”), rather than रहस्य. Mithila has an active Tantric-esoteric tradition (Nath-yogi and tantric siddha practice, associated with sites such as the Ugratara shrine) in which रहस्य/गुप्त विद्या names secret knowledge deliberately withheld from all but initiates. Biblical μυστήριον is the reverse: a truth once hidden but now openly proclaimed to everyone. भेद is proposed as a less occult-flavored option, but EVERY occurrence must carry (or reference) a translator note: “previously hidden, now openly revealed to all who believe — not secret knowledge reserved for initiates.”
stewardship/planοἰκονομία (oikonomia)household-managementadministrative plan, arrangementdispensation, plan, administration, stewardshipGod’s ordered unfolding of his saving purpose (1:10, 3:2, 3:9)New term — प्रबन्ध (prabandh, “arrangement/administration”). Medium risk, fairly neutral administrative term.
unite all things / recapitulateἀνακεφαλαιόω (anakephalaioō)to sum up under one headto bring all things under Christ’s headshipto unite, gather together, sum upChrist’s cosmic headship over all creation (1:10)New term — descriptive phrase required: “सब वस्तुकेँ ख्रीष्टक शिरमे एक करब” (to unite all things under Christ’s headship). High risk of theological richness lost if reduced to a single word; must be rendered as a full clause.
inheritanceκληρονομία (klēronomia)an allotted portion, heritagewhat one receives as an heirinheritance, heritageBelievers’ certain future inheritance in Christ (1:11, 1:14, 1:18)New term — उत्तराधिकार (uttarādhikār). HIGH RISK: Mithila’s Panjikaran-linked lineage and ancestral-property inheritance customs (Hindu joint-family succession practice) are a live, socially weighty institution; must be clearly marked as spiritual inheritance in Christ, not physical/ancestral property inheritance, to avoid confusing categories.
sealed / guarantee (down payment)ἐσφραγίσθητε / ἀρραβών (esphragisthēte / arrabōn)were sealed / earnest-money, pledgemark of ownership and security / partial payment guaranteeing the restsealed, guarantee, down payment, pledge, depositThe Holy Spirit as God’s mark of ownership and pledge of final inheritance (1:13-14)मुहर लगाओल गेल (muhar lagāol gel, “sealed/stamped”) for sealing; बयाना (bayānā, an everyday Maithili commercial term for earnest-money/advance payment) for guarantee. Medium risk: बयाना accurately mirrors the original commercial metaphor but must not reduce the Spirit’s presence to a cold financial transaction devoid of relational warmth — pair with पवित्र आत्मा (reuse baseline) for full sense.
enlightened eyes of the heartπεφωτισμένους τοὺς ὀφθαλμοὺς τῆς καρδίας (pephōtismenous tous ophthalmous tēs kardias)having been given light, eyes of the heartspiritual understanding granted by Godenlightened, opened eyes of understandingSpirit-given insight into the hope of the calling (1:18)HIGH RISK. Proposed: “मनक आँखि प्रकाशित होयब” (manak ā̃khi prakāśit hoeb). “Enlightenment” language strongly collides with Buddhist/Hindu enlightenment concepts (bodhi, moksha attained through self-realized knowledge/jñāna). Requires a translator note clarifying this is Spirit-given understanding of revealed gospel truth granted by grace, not self-attained mystical enlightenment or moksha-knowledge.
power (stacked vocabulary)δύναμις / ἐνέργεια / κράτος / ἰσχύς (dynamis / energeia / kratos / ischys)ability / working / dominion / strengthfour near-synonyms stacked for emphasis: “the immeasurable greatness of his power… according to the working of his great might” (1:19)power, working, might, strengthGod’s resurrection-power at work in believers, prefiguring ch. 6’s armor imageryHIGH RISK. δύναμις → REUSE सामर्थ्य (baseline’s power_of_god term). ἐνέργεια → propose “प्रभावशाली क्रिया” (effective working). κράτος → propose पराक्रम (might/valor). ἰσχύς → propose बल (strength). NEVER शक्ति for any of these (baseline’s Shakta-goddess caution applies with full force here, since this stacked passage is exactly the kind of “great power” language that could otherwise reach for शक्ति).
heavenly placesἐπουράνιος (epouranios)heavenly, above the heavensthe spiritual realm of Christ’s reign and cosmic conflictheavenly places, heavenly realmsWhere Christ is seated (1:20), where believers are seated (2:6), where spiritual conflict occurs (6:12)Same HIGH RISK treatment as in 2:6 above — स्वर्गीय स्थान, with mandatory distinguishing note from Puranic स्वर्ग (temporary karma-earned heaven).
throne, rule, authority, power, dominionθρόνος, ἀρχή, ἐξουσία, δύναμις, κυριότηςthrone / first-place / right-to-act / ability / lordshipa comprehensive list of cosmic ranks, all placed under Christrule, authority, power, dominionChrist’s supremacy over every conceivable spiritual rank (1:21) — foundational for the ch. 6 spiritual-warfare vocabularyसिंहासन, शासन, अधिकार, सामर्थ्य, प्रभुत्व. High risk as a set: establishes vocabulary reused in the Spiritual Warfare doctrine (ch. 3, ch. 6); consistency across occurrences is required.
age / this age and the one to comeαἰών (aiōn)age, erabounded epoch of timeage, this present age, the age to come1:21 explicitly contrasts “this age” with “the one to come” — a LINEAR frameworkSame CRITICAL yuga-caution as at 2:2/2:7. Never युग without a distinguishing note; prefer समय/संसार-framed renderings where possible.
fullness (of him who fills all in all)πλήρωμα (plērōma)that which fills, completenesstotality, completeness, “that which fills up”fullnessThe church as Christ’s “fullness” (1:23) — introduces the recurring πλήρωμα cluster (3:19, 4:13, 5:18)New term — परिपूर्णता (paripūrṇatā). High risk of theological richness: requires careful, consistent handling across all four major occurrences; flag for theologian review given its centrality to both Christology (Christ’s fullness) and ecclesiology (the church as his fullness).
church / bodyἐκκλησία / σῶμα (ekklēsia / sōma)assembly / bodyreusechurch, body of ChristIntroduces the Church as the Body of Christ doctrine (1:22-23), developed through ch. 4-5REUSE मण्डली exactly for church (baseline, Medium risk). New term for body-metaphor — देह (deh); propose “ख्रीष्टक देह” for the ecclesiological “body of Christ.” Medium risk: keep देह consistent with देहधारण’s root sense of a real, unified physical/organic whole, not a loose federation.

Chapter 2 (2:11-22) — continuing after the core passage

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
uncircumcision / circumcisionἀκροβυστία / περιτομή (akrobystia / peritomē)foreskin / a cutting-aroundGentile status / Jewish covenant-sign statusuncircumcision, circumcisionMarks the old Jew-Gentile boundary now abolished in Christ (2:11)HIGH RISK — NEW TERM. Standard North Indian rendering is खतना (khatanā), an established loanword — but in contemporary North Indian village life खतना is strongly associated specifically with Muslim religious practice. A translator note is required clarifying this refers to the Old Testament Jewish covenant sign given to Abraham, not to Islamic custom, so readers do not misassign the reference.
strangers/aliens, fellow citizensξένοι / συμπολῖται (xenoi / sympolitai)foreigners / fellow-citizensoutsider status / shared civic membershipstrangers and foreigners / fellow citizens with the saintsGentiles’ former exclusion, now full inclusion — feeds Unity of Jews and Gentiles doctrineपरदेशी (paradeśī) for strangers; सहनागरिक (sahanāgarik) for fellow citizens. Medium risk, fairly transparent.
household of Godοἰκεῖοι τοῦ θεοῦ (oikeioi tou theou)members of the householdfamily-insider statusmembers of God’s householdReinforces the Adoption doctrine corporatelyपरमेश्वरक घरानाक सदस्य (parameśvarak gharānāk sadasya). Medium risk.
dividing wall of hostilityμεσότοιχον τοῦ φραγμοῦ / ἔχθρα (mesotoichon tou phragmou / echthra)middle-wall of the fence / enmitythe barrier separating Jew and Gentile, now torn downdividing wall, wall of hostilityThe most vivid image in the Unity of Jews and Gentiles doctrine (2:14)New term — बैरक बिभाजन-देबाल (bairak bibhājan-debāl). HIGH RISK: this doctrine directly confronts caste- and lineage-based social hierarchy sustained by Mithila’s Panjikaran genealogical-verification system; must not be softened into vague “difference” language — the wall is explicitly torn down, and this equalizing force must be retained without qualification, per the baseline’s Unity of Jews and Gentiles risk notes.
new man / one new humanityεἷς καινὸς ἄνθρωπος (heis kainos anthrōpos)one new mana single new corporate humanity created out of two formerly hostile groupsone new man, one new humanityThe central positive claim of ch. 2: not assimilation of one group into the other, but a genuinely new third entity in ChristNew term — एक नब मनुष्य (ek nab manuṣya). HIGH RISK, central to the Unity doctrine; must be distinguished from mere social tolerance or coexistence — this is a new corporate identity superseding both former categories, directly challenging caste-based social hierarchy.
reconcileἀποκαταλλάσσω (apokatallassō)to reconcile fully/completelyrestoring hostile parties to peace through a third party’s mediating actreconcile, restore to peaceChrist reconciling both Jew and Gentile to God “in one body through the cross” (2:16)New term — मेल-मिलाप (mel-milāp, “reconciliation”). High risk: must be distinguished from a merely social compromise or negotiated truce — the reconciliation here is achieved solely through the cross, a completed divine act, not an ongoing human negotiation.
crossσταυρός (stauros)stake, crossthe instrument of Christ’s death, standing for his atoning workcross, the crossThe means of reconciliation (2:16); recurs implicitly through the atonement themeNew term — क्रूस (krūs), an established transliteration already standard across North Indian Bible translation traditions. Low risk.
accessπροσαγωγή (prosagōgē)a bringing-to, introductiondirect, unmediated approach to Godaccess, we have access, introductionBoth Jew and Gentile now have direct access to the Father through Christ, by one Spirit (2:18)New term — पहुँच (pahũch, “access/reach”). Medium risk: should be framed as direct, unmediated access, notably significant in a culture where Panjikaran genealogists and Ojha/priestly intermediaries commonly mediate access to sacred or social standing.
holy temple / dwelling placeναὸς ἅγιος / κατοικητήριον (naos hagios / katoikētērion)holy sanctuary / dwelling-placethe church corporately as God’s indwelt sanctuaryholy temple, dwelling place of GodThe climax of the chapter: believers together, built on Christ the cornerstone, growing into God’s dwelling place (2:20-22)CRITICAL RISK — NEW TERM. Baseline TM explicitly forbids मन्दिर (Hindu temple) for “church” (ekklēsia). Ephesians 2:21 uses a different but closely related image — ναός, “temple/sanctuary” — as a direct metaphor for the very same church body. If rendered मन्दिर here, it would directly reopen and contradict the baseline’s settled church≠मन्दिर distinction. Proposed: पवित्र धाम (pavitra dhām, “holy abode/sanctuary”) for ναός, and निवासस्थान (nivāsasthān, “dwelling place”) for κατοικητήριον — neither of which invokes a Hindu temple building. Flag for mandatory theologian review as a genuinely new collision point not anticipated in the Romans baseline.
cornerstone / foundationἀκρογωνιαῖος / θεμέλιος (akrogōniaios / themelios)topmost-corner(stone) / foundationthe structurally decisive stone; the basecornerstone, foundationChrist as the structural foundation of the church, with apostles/prophets as the foundation-layer (2:20)कोनाक पाथर (konāk pāthar) for cornerstone; नींव (nĩv) for foundation. Low-Medium risk.

Chapter 3 (Ephesians 3:1-21)

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
mystery of Christμυστήριον τοῦ Χριστοῦ (mystērion tou Christou)reusereusemystery of ChristSpecified content of the mystery: Gentiles are “fellow heirs, fellow members of the body, fellow partakers of the promise” (3:6)REUSE भेद from ch. 1, with same mandatory distinguishing note.
fellow heirs / fellow members of the body / fellow partakersσυγκληρονόμα / σύσσωμα / συμμέτοχα (synklēronoma / syssōma / symmetocha)co-heirs / co-bodied / co-partakersthree compound terms stressing FULL EQUALITY, not junior-partner inclusionfellow heirs, members of the same body, partakers togetherThe strongest statement in the book of Gentile equality with Jewish believers — central to Unity of Jews and Gentilesसहवारिस (sahavāris, “co-heir”); देहमे सहभागी (dehme sahabhāgī, “co-participant in the body”); प्रतिज्ञाक सहभागी (pratijñāk sahabhāgī, “co-participant in the promise”). HIGH RISK: the “सह-” (co-/fellow-) prefix pattern must be visibly consistent across all three terms in Maithili to preserve Paul’s rhetorical emphasis on full equality, directly countering any lingering hierarchical reading rooted in caste/lineage status distinctions.
stewardship, revelationοἰκονομία, ἀποκάλυψις (oikonomia, apokalypsis)reuse from ch.1 conceptsadministrative grace-gift / unveilingstewardship of grace, revelationPaul’s own apostolic commission to reveal the mystery (3:2-3)REUSE प्रबन्ध (ch.1); New term — प्रकाशन (prakāśan, “revelation/unveiling”) for ἀποκάλυψις. Low-Medium risk.
manifold wisdomπολυποίκιλος σοφία (polypoikilos sophia)many-colored/varied wisdomGod’s rich, multifaceted wisdom displayed through the churchmanifold wisdom, many-sided wisdomThe church itself displays God’s wisdom to the “rulers and authorities in heavenly places” (3:10)New term — नाना प्रकारक बुद्धि (nānā prakārak buddhi). Medium risk: बुद्धि (wisdom/intellect) chosen over ज्ञान to reduce (though not eliminate) association with the jñāna-mārga (path-of-knowledge) soteriology of Vedantic thought, in which self-attained knowledge itself liberates. A clarifying note may be needed: this is wisdom displayed by God through the church’s existence, not wisdom attained by human contemplation.
rulers and authorities in the heavenly placesἀρχαὶ καὶ ἐξουσίαι ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις (archai kai exousiai en tois epouraniois)reuseorganized spiritual powersrulers and authoritiesThe church’s very existence as a Jew-Gentile unity is itself a message preached to the spiritual realm — ties Unity doctrine to Spiritual Warfare doctrineREUSE शासक आ अधिकारी established in ch.1/2:2; Critical/High per Spiritual Warfare doctrine (see ch. 6 for full treatment).
boldness/confidence, access with confidenceπαρρησία, προσαγωγὴ ἐν πεποιθήσει (parrēsia, prosagōgē en pepoithēsei)freedom of speech / access with persuasionconfident, unashamed approach to Godboldness, confidence, access with confidenceBelievers’ confident access to God through faith in Christ (3:12)New term — निडरता/साहस (niḍartā/sāhas, “fearlessness/courage”) reused with पहुँच (access, from ch. 2). Medium risk.
rooted and groundedἐρριζωμένοι καὶ τεθεμελιωμένοι (errizōmenoi kai tethemeliōmenoi)having been rooted and foundedstable, well-establishedrooted and grounded, establishedBelievers stabilized in Christ’s love (3:17)New term — जड़ जमाओल आ नींवपर स्थापित (jaḍ jamāol ā nĩvpar sthāpit). Low risk, descriptive.
breadth, length, height, depthπλάτος, μῆκος, ὕψος, βάθοςspatial dimension wordsthe vastness of Christ’s love, beyond full comprehensionbreadth and length and height and depthEmphasizes the immeasurability of Christ’s love (3:18)Straightforward spatial vocabulary: चौड़ाई, लम्बाई, ऊँचाई, गहराई. Low risk.
fullness of Godπλήρωμα τοῦ θεοῦ (plērōma tou theou)reuse πλήρωμαthe goal of Christian maturity: being filled up to God’s own completenessfilled with all the fullness of GodClimax of Paul’s prayer (3:19); connects to ch. 1’s and ch. 4’s πλήρωμα occurrencesREUSE परिपूर्णता from ch. 1, same High-risk handling required for consistency.

Chapter 4 (Ephesians 4:1-32)

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
walk worthyπεριπατῆσαι ἀξίως (peripatēsai axiōs)reuse περιπατέωto live in a manner matching one’s callingwalk worthy of the callingBegins the ethical section, tying back to “calling” (baseline term)REUSE चलब (walk) + बजाओल जाएब (calling, baseline).
unity of the Spirit / bond of peaceἑνότης τοῦ πνεύματος / σύνδεσμος τῆς εἰρήνης (henotēs tou pneumatos / syndesmos tēs eirēnēs)oneness of the Spirit / bond of peacethe church’s God-given, Spirit-produced unity, to be diligently maintained (not created)unity of the Spirit, bond of peaceCore of the Church as the Body of Christ doctrine (4:3)New term — एकता (ekatā) for unity; शान्तिक बन्धन (śāntik bandhan) for bond of peace, reusing शान्ति (peace, baseline). HIGH RISK: एकता must be presented as Spirit-produced and Christ-grounded, not generic social harmony rhetoric that could flatten the specific theological ground of Jew-Gentile unity into a vague, caste-blind civility slogan divorced from the cross (cf. ch. 2).
seven-fold unity formulaἓν σῶμα, ἓν πνεῦμα, μία ἐλπίς, εἷς κύριος, μία πίστις, ἓν βάπτισμα, εἷς θεὸς καὶ πατήρ (4:4-6)one body, one Spirit, one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Fathera doctrinal creed-like listone body, one Spirit, one hope…The theological ground of unity: singular realities, not many competing pathsREUSE: body=देह, Spirit=आत्मा (पवित्र आत्मा, baseline), Lord=प्रभु (baseline), faith=विश्वास (baseline), God and Father=परमेश्वर पिता (baseline). New term — hope = आशा (āśā, Medium risk, standard); New term — baptism = बपतिस्मा (bapatismā), the established North Indian Bible transliteration, Low-Medium risk. CRITICAL: the “one…one…one” repeated structure must be preserved in Maithili syntax since it is the passage’s rhetorical argument against a “many paths” pluralistic religious framework common in the region.
grace given / giftsἡ χάρις ἐδόθη / δόματα (hē charis edothē / domata)grace was given / giftsChrist’s gift-giving to equip the church, following his ascent (4:7-8, citing Psalm 68)grace was given, he gave giftsIntroduces the Gifts for Building Up the Church doctrineREUSE अनुग्रह (grace, baseline); New term — वरदान may be used here specifically because it is Christ’s gift to the church (reuse baseline’s spiritual_gifts pattern: आत्मिक वरदान), Medium risk.
apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, teachersἀπόστολοι, προφῆται, εὐαγγελισταί, ποιμένες, διδάσκαλοιoffice-titlesthe five (or four) ministry offices given to equip the churchapostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachersThe concrete “gifts” of 4:11REUSE प्रेरित (apostle) and भविष्यद्वक्ता (prophet), both baseline. New term — सुसमाचार प्रचारक (susamācār pracārak, “gospel proclaimer”) for evangelist, built on established सुसमाचार प्रचार (mission, baseline), Low-Medium risk. New term — पासक/शिक्षक for teacher (शिक्षक, standard, Low risk). HIGH-VALUE CATCH for pastor/shepherd (ποιμήν): a literal shepherd word (e.g. गड़ेरिया) risks doubling as a caste-occupational name (the Gaderiya/Gadariya shepherd caste of North India), which would introduce an unintended and inappropriate caste association into a ministry-office title. Proposed: रखवार (rakhavār, “guardian/keeper”) — an abstract caring-oversight term that avoids the occupational-caste-name collision. Flag Medium-High risk for native speaker review.
equippingκαταρτισμός (katartismos)making fit, preparingtraining/preparing believers for ministryequipping, perfectingThe purpose of the ministry offices (4:12)New term — सुसज्जित करब (susajjit karab, “to make ready/equip”). Low-Medium risk.
building up the body of Christοἰκοδομὴ τοῦ σώματος τοῦ Χριστοῦ (oikodomē tou sōmatos tou Christou)reuse baseline’s mutual_edificationbuilding up in the corporate, ecclesial sensebuilding up the body of ChristReuses the Low-risk baseline “mutual edification” concept but applied corporatelyREUSE पारस्परिक उन्नति (baseline) alongside ख्रीष्टक देह (ch. 1).
mature manhood / fullness of Christἀνὴρ τέλειος / πλήρωμα τοῦ Χριστοῦ (anēr teleios / plērōma tou Christou)complete/perfect man / fullness of Christcorporate spiritual maturity, the goal of church growth (4:13)mature manhood, full stature of ChristThe church’s corporate goal: unified, mature, Christlike fullnessHIGH RISK — NEW TERM. τέλειος (“perfect/mature”) must NOT be rendered सिद्ध (siddha) — a heavily loaded term across North Indian Nath-yogi and Tantric traditions naming a person who has attained supernatural perfection/powers through yogic-ascetic practice (a “siddha”). Proposed instead: पूर्ण/परिपक्व मनुष्य (pūrṇa/paripakva manuṣya, “complete/mature person”). REUSE परिपूर्णता for πλήρωμα.
old self / new selfπαλαιὸς ἄνθρωπος / καινὸς ἄνθρωπος (palaios anthrōpos / kainos anthrōpos)old man / new manthe believer’s former unregenerate identity vs. new Christ-given identity (individual sense here, contrasted with 2:15’s corporate “one new man”)old self, new self, old man, new manTies the Walking in Newness of Life doctrine to concrete daily ethics (4:22-24)पुरान मनुष्य / नब मनुष्य (purān manuṣya / nab manuṣya). Medium-High risk: keep terminologically distinct in context from ch. 2’s corporate “one new man” (एक नब मनुष्य) even while sharing the root, since one is individual-transformational and the other is corporate-reconciliatory.
created after God in righteousness and holinessκτισθεὶς κατὰ θεὸν ἐν δικαιοσύνῃ καὶ ὁσιότητι τῆς ἀληθείας (4:24)reuse κτίζωthe new self is itself a fresh divine creation bearing God’s moral likenesscreated in true righteousness and holinessConnects Walking in Newness of Life back to the Salvation doctrine’s “created” language (cf. 2:10)REUSE धार्मिकता (righteousness, baseline, Critical). New term — पवित्रता/धर्मपरायणता for ὁσιότης (holiness/godly devotion) — distinct nuance from पवित्र (holy, baseline) as this stresses devout moral character; Medium risk.
grieve the Holy Spiritλυπεῖτε τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον (lypeite to pneuma to hagion)do not grievethe Spirit is personally hurt/offended by singrieve not the Holy SpiritDirect evidence of the Spirit’s personhood — reinforces baseline’s insistence that पवित्र आत्मा is personal, never an impersonal universal forceREUSE पवित्र आत्मा (baseline, Critical). New term — दुखी करब (dukhī karab, “to grieve/sadden”). HIGH RISK theologically: this verse is a strong textual anchor for personhood of the Spirit and should be flagged alongside baseline’s existing ब्रह्म/परमात्मा caution.
vice/virtue listsπικρία, θυμός, ὀργή, κραυγή, βλασφημία, κακία / χρηστότης, εὔσπλαγχνος, χαριζόμενοι (4:31-32)bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, slander, malice / kind, tenderhearted, forgivingstandard ethical catalog vocabularybitterness…malice / kindness…forgivingPractical outworking of “putting off/putting on” the old/new selfStandard Maithili equivalents: कड़वाहट, क्रोध, गुस्सा, कोलाहल, निन्दा, दुर्भावना / दयालु, करुणामय, क्षमा करएबला. Low-Medium risk as a set; no major syncretism concern beyond ensuring क्षमा (forgiveness) stays consistent with its ch.1 rendering.

Chapter 5 (Ephesians 5:1-33)

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
imitators of Godμιμηταὶ τοῦ θεοῦ (mimētai tou theou)imitators, mimicsreflecting God’s moral character in conductbe imitators of GodGrounds ethics in reflecting God’s character, not attaining divine statusNew term — परमेश्वरक अनुकरण करएबला (parameśvarak anukaraṇ karaebalā). HIGH RISK: must be clearly framed as reflecting God’s moral character (love, as v.2 specifies), not as mystical identification with or absorption into the divine — a real risk given bhakti traditions in which intense devotional imitation of a deity’s life (e.g., Krishna’s līlā) can shade into identity-merging devotional practice.
offering and sacrificeπροσφορὰ καὶ θυσία (prosphora kai thysia)offering and sacrificeChrist’s self-giving death described in Levitical sacrificial termsoffering and sacrifice, fragrant offeringChrist’s death as the perfect, final, self-given sacrifice of love (5:2)HIGH RISK — NEW TERM. Propose भेंट आ अर्पण (bheṇṭ ā arpaṇ, “offering and dedication”) rather than बलिदान, whose everyday Maithili/Hindi usage is closely tied to animal-blood sacrifice (बलि) offered at Shakta goddess shrines to petition or appease a deity. A translator note is required: Christ’s self-sacrifice is a once-for-all act of self-giving love for others, not a ritual offering that manipulates divine favor — theologically related to, but categorically different from, regional bali practice.
sexual immorality, impurity, covetousness = idolatryπορνεία, ἀκαθαρσία, πλεονεξία = εἰδωλολατρία (porneia, akatharsia, pleonexia = eidōlolatria)fornication, uncleanness, greed = image-worshipvice list culminating in an equation with idol-worshipsexual immorality…covetousness which is idolatry5:5’s identification of covetousness AS idolatry is the single most culturally sensitive clause in the chapterCRITICAL RISK. εἰδωλολατρία literally names precisely what the majority Hindu culture around the audience practices reverently as मूर्तिपूजा (mūrtipūjā, image/idol worship). Rendering this literally risks the verse being heard as a blanket, in-passing condemnation of the neighboring religious tradition rather than as Paul’s specific rhetorical point (that greed functions like idol-worship because it makes a created thing one’s functional god). REQUIRES a mandatory theologian-reviewed translator note clarifying the metaphorical logic of the comparison, not merely the literal term. Standard vice terms: व्यभिचार (porneia), अशुद्धता (akatharsia), लोभ (pleonexia) — Low-Medium risk individually.
children of light / darknessτέκνα φωτός / σκότος (tekna phōtos / skotos)children of light / darknessmoral-spiritual categories, not literal illuminationchildren of light, once darknessEthical dualism grounding the “walk” ethic (5:8)HIGH RISK — NEW TERM. ज्योति (light) was already flagged in the baseline as risking conflation with Puranic divine-luster imagery when used for “glory”; here the risk is compounded by Mithila’s Chhath festival tradition, which centrally venerates the sun (Sūrya) as a living source of light and life. Propose “ज्योतिक सन्तान” with a clarifying note that “light” here names moral-spiritual character revealed by the gospel, not solar veneration or divine radiance in the Puranic sense. अन्हार (darkness) is Low risk.
be filled with the Spiritπληροῦσθε ἐν πνεύματι (plērousthe en pneumati)be being filledcontinuous Spirit-empowered life, contrasted with drunkenness (5:18)be filled with the SpiritCentral to the Walking in Newness of Life doctrine’s practical outworkingHIGH RISK — NEW TERM. Propose “पवित्र आत्मासँ भरल होयब” (pavitra ātmāsã̃ bharal hoeb). Must carry a translator note distinguishing this from folk possession-trance phenomena (आवेश/संचरण) practiced in regional goddess-worship and Ojha ritual, in which a deity or spirit is understood to temporarily “enter” or “possess” a devotee. Being filled with the Spirit in Ephesians is an ongoing, morally fruitful yielding to God’s own personal Spirit, not an ecstatic trance-possession episode.
psalms, hymns, spiritual songsψαλμοῖς καὶ ὕμνοις καὶ ᾠδαῖς πνευματικαῖςpsalms, hymns, spiritual odescorporate worship-song vocabularypsalms and hymns and spiritual songsThe overflow of Spirit-filled community life (5:19)New term — भजन, स्तुतिगान, आत्मिक गीत (bhajan, stutigān, ātmik gīt). Medium risk: भजन is the standard genre-term for Hindu bhakti devotional song (to Krishna, Ram, Shiva); likely acceptable given its wide familiarity and its established use across North Indian Christian hymnody, but requires a clarifying note that the object of praise is Christ.
submitting to one anotherὑποτασσόμενοι ἀλλήλοις (hypotassomenoi allēlois)subjecting yourselves to one anothermutual, reciprocal submission as the frame for all household relationships (5:21)submit to one another, be subject to one anotherGoverns the entire Household Codes section — mutuality is the frame before any one-directional instruction followsHIGH RISK — NEW TERM. Proposed: अधीन होयब (adhīn hoeb, “to be submissive/subject to”). Must retain the mutual force of 5:21 (submitting to ONE ANOTHER) distinctly from the specific, non-reciprocal instruction to wives in 5:22-24, since Mithila’s strong patriarchal family and marriage customs (including dowry-linked social expectations) make it easy to collapse the whole passage into one-directional female submission alone, losing Paul’s careful mutual frame and his parallel, costly instruction to husbands (5:25). Requires theologian review.
headκεφαλή (kephalē)head (of a body)source, authority, organic-connection metaphorhead of the wife, head of the churchChrist as head of the church (5:23), applied analogically to husband as head of wifeNew term — शिर (śir, “head”). Medium-High risk: must be handled with the same care as any headship-authority metaphor in a strongly patriarchal social setting — the analogy’s controlling term is Christ’s sacrificial, self-giving love (5:25), not raw authority, and this qualifying context must not be lost.
savior of the bodyσωτὴρ τοῦ σώματος (sōtēr tou sōmatos)savior of the bodyChrist’s saving headship over the churchsavior of the bodyConnects headship directly to the Salvation doctrine, guarding against a purely authoritarian reading of headshipNew term — उद्धारकर्ता (uddhārkartā, “savior/deliverer”), built directly on baseline’s उद्धार root. Low-Medium risk, straightforward derivation.
one fleshμία σάρξ (mia sarx)one fleshmarital union, citing Genesis 2:24one flesh, become one fleshChrist-and-church union as the deep pattern behind marital union (5:31-32)New term — एक देह (ek deh). Low-Medium risk.
great mysteryμυστήριον…μέγα (mystērion…mega)reuse μυστήριονPaul’s own comment that the Christ-church analogy is itself part of the “mystery”this is a profound mystery / great mysteryTies household-code teaching back to the Mystery of Christ doctrineREUSE भेद, same distinguishing-note requirement as ch. 1/3.

Chapter 6 (Ephesians 6:1-24)

TermGreek / Translit.Literal meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningMaithili rendering & risk
obey / honor parentsὑπακούετε / τίμα τὸν πατέρα καὶ τὴν μητέραreuse ὑπακοή root (baseline’s obedience_of_faith) / honorfilial obedience and honor, cited from the Ten Commandmentschildren obey your parents, honor father and motherGrounds household ethics in OT covenant law, applied within the “in the Lord” frame (6:1)New term — आज्ञा पालन करब (ājñā pālan karab, obey) and आदर करब (ādar karab, honor). Low-Medium risk; ensure “in the Lord” qualifier is preserved so obedience is Christ-framed, not raw filial duty of the kind emphasized in Mithila’s dharma-ordered household ideal (cf. baseline’s caution on obedience_of_faith vs. कर्तव्य पालन).
discipline and instruction of the Lordπαιδεία καὶ νουθεσία κυρίου (paideia kai nouthesia kyriou)training/discipline and admonition/counsel of the LordChrist-centered child-rearing, not provoking children to anger (6:4)discipline and instruction of the LordReframes parenting as ministry under Christ’s authority, not mere dharma-bound duty transmissionNew term — प्रभुक अनुशासन आ शिक्षा (prabhuk anuśāsan ā śikṣā), reusing प्रभु (Lord, baseline). Medium risk.
bondservants/slaves; mastersδοῦλοι; κύριοι κατὰ σάρκα (douloi; kyrioi kata sarka)slaves; masters according to the fleshthe ancient household-slavery institution, addressed pastorally, not abolished outright in this textbondservants, slaves; mastersHousehold Codes doctrine’s most historically and ethically sensitive section (6:5-9)REUSE दास (dās), the established North Indian Bible term for δοῦλος (also used elsewhere for “servant of Christ”), Low-Medium risk with a note on dual usage. CRITICAL DISAMBIGUATION REQUIRED for “masters” (κύριοι): the same Greek root (κύριος) elsewhere in this very book names the divine Lord (baseline: प्रभु, Critical risk, exclusive supreme Lordship). Here it names ordinary human slave-owners. Baseline’s rejected-alternatives list for “lord” already identifies मालिक as the correct, distinct term for this exact human-master sense — मालिक must be used here specifically so that प्रभु remains reserved exclusively for Christ throughout the book, with no blurring between divine Lordship and human ownership. Flag as a context-sensitive polysemy risk parallel to baseline’s treatment of “called.”
eye-service, people-pleasersὀφθαλμοδουλία, ἀνθρωπάρεσκοι (ophthalmodoulia, anthrōpareskoi)eye-slavery, men-pleasersperformative obedience only when observedeye-service, men-pleasersContrasts external compliance with heartfelt service “as to the Lord” (6:6-7)देखाबटीक सेवा (dekhābaṭīk sevā, “service for show”); मनुष्यकेँ प्रसन्न करएबला (manuṣyakẽ prasanna karaebalā). Low-Medium risk.
no partialityπροσωπολημψία (prosōpolēmpsia)face-receivingfavoritism based on external statusno partiality, no respect of personsGod shows no favoritism between master and slave (6:9) — reinforces Universal Human Accountability doctrine from Romans, extended here across social/economic statusपक्षपात (pakṣapāt, “partiality/favoritism”), negated: पक्षपात नहि करब. HIGH RISK theologically given Mithila’s caste- and status-conscious social structure; must retain full force — God’s impartiality extends across master/slave, and by extension caste/status lines.
be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his mightἐνδυναμοῦσθε ἐν κυρίῳ καὶ ἐν τῷ κράτει τῆς ἰσχύος αὐτοῦ (6:10)reuse κράτος/ἰσχύς stack from 1:19empowerment for spiritual battle, sourced in Christ alonebe strong in the LordOpening summons to the Spiritual Warfare doctrine, echoing ch. 1’s power-vocabularyREUSE पराक्रम and बल from ch.1’s power cluster for consistency; प्रभुमे बलवान होयब (prabhume balavān hoeb). High risk, never शक्ति.
whole armor of Godπανοπλία τοῦ θεοῦ (panoplia tou theou)full/complete armorthe complete set of defensive/offensive equipment God supplieswhole armor of God, full armorThe controlling image of the Spiritual Warfare doctrine (6:11, 6:13)HIGH/CRITICAL RISK — NEW TERM. Proposed: परमेश्वरक सम्पूर्ण हथियार (parameśvarak sampūrṇa hathiyār, “God’s complete weapons/equipment”). अस्त्र (divine mythological weapon, e.g. Brahmastra) and कवच (as in Karna’s mythical invincible armor in the Mahabharata) both carry strong epic-mythological resonance in North Indian religious literature and must be used with caution or avoided; हथियार (weapon/equipment) is comparatively neutral. Requires a translator note distinguishing Paul’s spiritual-equipment metaphor from mythological divine weapons bestowed on epic heroes.
schemes of the devilμεθοδεία τοῦ διαβόλου (methodeia tou diabolou)craftiness/schemes of the devilorganized, strategic deceptionschemes, wiles, deceitful schemes of the devilNames a personal, strategic adversary, not diffuse impersonal misfortuneशैतानक चाल (śaitānak cāl, “the devil’s tactics/moves”). Reuse शैतान (śaitān), an established transliteration.
devilδιάβολος (diabolos)slanderer, accuserSatan, the personal chief adversarydevil, SatanNames the singular personal adversary of Spiritual Warfare doctrine, distinct from the many localized folk spirits addressed by an OjhaCRITICAL RISK. शैतान (śaitān) is the established transliteration and should be retained, but requires a clarifying note distinguishing it both from (a) mythological antagonist-figures in regional epic narrative (e.g., Ravana), who are defeated rivals within the same storyworld rather than a spiritual adversary opposed through prayer and faith, and (b) the many localized bhoot-pret (troublesome ghosts/spirits) that Mithila’s living Ojha exorcist tradition addresses through mantra, ritual, and shrine-based counter-measures. Biblical spiritual warfare is fought through Christ’s armor, truth, righteousness, faith, and prayer — never through Ojha-style ritual counter-magic.
flesh and blood; rulers, authorities, cosmic powers over this present darkness, spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly placesπρὸς αἷμα καὶ σάρκα…ἀλλὰ πρὸς τὰς ἀρχάς, πρὸς τὰς ἐξουσίας, πρὸς τοὺς κοσμοκράτορας τοῦ σκότους τούτου, πρὸς τὰ πνευματικὰ τῆς πονηρίας ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις (6:12)not against blood and flesh, but against the rulers, the authorities, the world-rulers of this darkness, the spiritual [forces] of wickedness in the heavenliesthe fullest statement in the NT of organized, ranked spiritual oppositionnot against flesh and blood but against principalities, powers, rulers of the darkness of this world, spiritual wickedness in high placesThe doctrinal centerpiece of Spiritual Warfare — real, organized, ranked spiritual opposition, requiring divine equipment, not human strength or ritual counter-measuresCRITICAL RISK — NEW DOCTRINE CLUSTER. REUSE शासक, अधिकारी from ch.1/2/3. New terms: κοσμοκράτορες → propose “ई अन्हार संसारक बलवान शासक” (the powerful rulers of this dark world); πνευματικὰ τῆς πονηρίας ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις → propose “आकाशीय क्षेत्रक दुष्ट आत्मिक शक्तिसभ” (evil spiritual powers of the heavenly realm) — NOTE: शक्ति is used here only as a plain descriptive plural noun (“powers/forces”), never as a name or title for God’s power (which remains सामर्थ्य throughout); this single controlled exception should be flagged explicitly for reviewer awareness to prevent it being mistaken for a violation of the baseline’s शक्ति-prohibition. This entire cluster requires MANDATORY human theologian review and should be recorded as a new “Spiritual Warfare” doctrine entry, comparable in weight to the baseline’s Critical doctrines, given its direct collision with Mithila’s living Ojha/exorcism and bhoot-pret folk-religious practice.
armor pieces: belt of truth, breastplate of righteousness, shoes of the gospel of peace, shield of faith, helmet of salvation, sword of the Spirit/word of Godζώνη τῆς ἀληθείας, θώραξ τῆς δικαιοσύνης, ὑποδησάμενοι…τοῦ εὐαγγελίου τῆς εἰρήνης, θυρεὸς τῆς πίστεως, περικεφαλαία τοῦ σωτηρίου, μάχαιρα τοῦ πνεύματος ὅ ἐστιν ῥῆμα θεοῦitemized armor pieces, each paired with a theological virtuesix pieces of spiritual equipment, each already-established baseline term paired with a piece of Roman military equipmentbelt of truth…sword of the SpiritConcrete, memorable application of prior doctrines (truth, righteousness, gospel, peace, faith, salvation, word of God) to the spiritual-warfare frameEach virtue-term REUSES its baseline/earlier rendering exactly: धार्मिकता (righteousness, Critical), सुसमाचार (gospel, High), शान्ति (peace, Medium), विश्वास (faith, High), उद्धार (salvation, Critical). New equipment-nouns: सत्यक पेटी (belt of truth), धार्मिकताक छाती-कवच (breastplate of righteousness — कवच used narrowly here as ordinary “chest-guard,” acceptable in this itemized-equipment list though flagged above as riskier for the summary phrase “armor of God”), शान्तिक सुसमाचारक जूता (shoes of the gospel of peace), विश्वासक ढाल (shield of faith), उद्धारक टोप (helmet of salvation), आत्माक तरवार, जे परमेश्वरक वचन थिक (sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God). Medium risk as a set; consistency with baseline terms in each phrase is the primary requirement.
word of God (rhema)ῥῆμα θεοῦ (rhēma theou)a spoken word/utterance of GodGod’s spoken utterance, here identified with the Spirit’s swordword of GodDefines the offensive weapon of the armor setNew term — परमेश्वरक वचन (parameśvarak vacan). Low-Medium risk, standard.
praying at all times in the Spirit; being watchfulπροσευχόμενοι ἐν παντὶ καιρῷ ἐν πνεύματι…ἀγρυπνοῦντες (6:18)praying in every season, in the Spirit; keeping watch/being sleeplesscontinuous, Spirit-empowered, alert prayerpray at all times in the Spirit, keep watchPrayer as the sustaining posture of spiritual warfare, distinct from ritual petition to a shrine deity or intermediaryREUSE baseline’s प्रार्थना (prayer) and पवित्र आत्मा; New term — जागरूक रहब (jāgarūk rahab, “remain watchful/alert”). Medium risk: distinguish this direct, Spirit-enabled prayer from ritual puja or Ojha-mediated petitionary practice.
ambassador in chainsπρεσβεύω ἐν ἁλύσει (presbeuō en halysei)to act as an elder/envoy, in a chainPaul’s self-description as Christ’s authorized representative even while imprisonedambassador in chains, ambassador for the gospel though in chainsReinforces the Apostleship and Mission doctrines under sufferingNew term — साँकरमे राजदूत (sã̃karme rājdūt, “ambassador/envoy in chains”). Low-Medium risk, descriptive; राजदूत ties naturally to प्रेरित (apostle, baseline) as an authorized representative sent with delegated authority.

Cross-Cutting Risk Themes Introduced by Ephesians (Beyond the Romans Baseline)

  1. Predestination vocabulary (προορίζω) is a genuinely new Critical-risk term not covered by baseline’s “election,” requiring its own fatalism-avoidance safeguard (प्रारब्ध/भाग्य/किस्मत forbidden).
  2. Mystery vocabulary (μυστήριον) collides with Mithila’s living Tantric-esoteric tradition; भेद is proposed over रहस्य, with a mandatory “hidden-then-revealed-to-all” disambiguating note at every occurrence.
  3. Spiritual Warfare/armor vocabulary (chs. 1, 3, 6) is an entirely new Critical doctrine cluster colliding with the region’s living Ojha-exorcism and bhoot-pret folk tradition, and secondarily with epic-mythological divine-weapon imagery (अस्त्र, कवच).
  4. “Temple” as a metaphor for the church (ναός, 2:21) risks reopening the baseline’s settled church≠मन्दिर distinction if not handled with a fresh, non-मन्दिर rendering (पवित्र धाम).
  5. Household Codes vocabulary (submission, headship, masters) intersects Mithila’s strong patriarchal family/marriage customs and requires careful preservation of Paul’s mutual-submission frame (5:21) and the κύριος/मालिक-प्रभु disambiguation (6:5-9).
  6. Ministry-office vocabulary, specifically “pastor/shepherd,” risks an inadvertent caste-occupational-name collision (e.g., गड़ेरिया) and should use an abstract guardianship term (रखवार) instead.
  7. αἰών (“age”) recurs far more densely in Ephesians (1:21, 2:2, 2:7, 3:9, 3:21) than in Romans and requires sustained vigilance against a yuga-cycle cosmological reading throughout, not just at isolated points.
  8. εἰδωλολατρία (“idolatry”) applied metaphorically to covetousness (5:5) is one of the single most culturally sensitive individual clauses in the whole book given the dominant regional tradition of मूर्तिपूजा, and requires a mandatory theologian-reviewed note on Paul’s specific comparative logic.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words