Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis — Gospel of Mark (Original Koine Greek)

Scope and Method

This analysis follows the PRD Phase 1 Step 1 mandate: full-book coverage of Mark 1–16 in the original Koine Greek, with the core passage (Mark 10:35–45) receiving exhaustive verse-by-verse treatment as the theological anchor, and every other chapter receiving a section documenting its load-bearing theological vocabulary. Terms already fixed in the baseline Romans Language Package (translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json) are reused exactly — they are marked “(baseline — reuse exactly)” below and are not re-litigated. New terms required for Mark are proposed with a recommended Polish rendering and risk tier, to be ratified in 08_core_glossary.md and formally added to translation memory in Phase 2 preflight.

Risk tiers follow the baseline convention: Critical (human theologian review, every occurrence), High (human theologian review), Medium (native speaker review), Low (automated review).


PART 1 — CORE PASSAGE VERSE-BY-VERSE: Mark 10:35–45

This pericope is the Christological and soteriological summit of Mark: it fuses five of the eight curriculum doctrines — Suffering Servant/Son of God, Faith and Discipleship amid Fear, Necessity of the Cross, Servanthood versus Worldly Greatness, and Ransom for Many — into a single scene.

Mark 10:35 — “Καὶ προσπορεύονται αὐτῷ Ἰάκωβος καὶ Ἰωάννης οἱ υἱοὶ Ζεβεδαίου λέγοντες αὐτῷ, Διδάσκαλε, θέλομεν ἵνα ὃ ἐὰν αἰτήσωμέν σε ποιήσῃς ἡμῖν.”

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
ΔιδάσκαλεDidaskale”Teacher” (vocative)Instructor, rabbi-equivalent title”Teacher,” “Master,” “Rabbi”James and John address Jesus with a merely human-honorific title even as they approach him with a request that presumes messianic enthronement power — an irony central to the Messianic Secret theme: those closest to Jesus still address him below his true identity.”Nauczycielu” — Medium. Standard, unambiguous; risk is purely catechetical (contrast the modest title used here with the full christological weight the passage will reveal).
θέλομεν / θέλῃ (θέλω)thelōto will, wish, desireranges from simple preference to determined intention”want,” “wish,” “desire”The disciples’ θέλω (“we want”) in v.35 is deliberately echoed and reversed by ὃς ἂν θέλῃ (“whoever wants”) in vv.43-44 — Mark structures the whole unit around competing desires (self-exaltation vs. servanthood).“chcemy” / “chce” — Low. Standard verb; translators should preserve the verbal echo across the passage where feasible.
αἰτήσωμέν (αἰτέω)aitēsōmento ask, request, demandrequest ranging from polite petition to presumptuous demand”ask,” “request”The construction (“whatever we ask”) is a blank-check request, revealing presumption before the request’s content is even known.”o co poprosimy” — Low.

Synthesis: No forbidden-substitution risk here, but the verse sets up the irony the rest of the passage resolves: an honorific but inadequate title, paired with a self-serving, open-ended request.

Mark 10:36 — “ὁ δὲ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς, Τί θέλετε ‹με› ποιήσω ὑμῖν;”

No new load-bearing theological term; reuses θέλω (v.35). Jesus’ question functions as a diagnostic probe, typical of Mark’s Christ who exposes hidden motive (cf. 2:8).

Mark 10:37 — “οἱ δὲ εἶπαν αὐτῷ, Δὸς ἡμῖν ἵνα εἷς σου ἐκ δεξιῶν καὶ εἷς ἐξ ἀριστερῶν καθίσωμεν ἐν τῇ δόξῃ σου.”

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
Δὸς (δίδωμι)dosgivegrant, bestow, hand over”give,” “grant”The same root verb (δίδωμι) that James and John use here to demand a gift for themselves recurs in v.45 where Jesus gives his own life — Mark’s sharpest ironic wordplay in the unit: self-serving “give us” vs. self-giving “he gave.” Preserve the verbal link if the Polish verb “dać/dawać” can be used at both points.”Dać nam” — Low lexically, High structurally: translators must ensure “dać” (v.37) and “dać” / “oddać” (v.45) remain recognizably related in Polish so the irony is not lost.
ἐκ δεξιῶν / ἐξ ἀριστερῶνek dexiōn / ex aristerōnat the right / at the left (hand)seats of highest honor and second honor in ancient royal court protocol”at your right hand,” “at your left hand”A request for the two highest positions of honor in Christ’s anticipated messianic enthronement — read (mistakenly) as an earthly royal court.”po prawej… po lewej stronie” — Medium. Cultural note required: modern Polish readers may miss the ancient court-protocol background without a footnote.
δόξῃ (δόξα)doxēgloryradiance, honor, splendor, divine visible presence”glory,” “splendor”(baseline — reuse exactly: “chwała”). Here glory is (mis)understood as courtly, triumphal enthronement glory, which Jesus will redefine through the cross and the “cup.""chwała” — High (per baseline doctrine “Deity of Christ”/“Glory”). Note for Mark: this occurrence must be flagged as a doctrinally instructive misunderstanding of glory that the passage corrects.

Mark 10:38 — “ὁ δὲ Ἰησοῦς εἶπεν αὐτοῖς, Οὐκ οἴδατε τί αἰτεῖσθε. δύνασθε πιεῖν τὸ ποτήριον ὃ ἐγὼ πίνω, ἢ τὸ βάπτισμα ὃ ἐγὼ βαπτίζομαι βαπτισθῆναι;“

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
ποτήριονpotērioncupa literal drinking vessel; figuratively, one’s allotted portion — of blessing or of suffering/wrath”cup”Draws on OT imagery of the “cup” of God’s wrath/judgment (Ps 75:8; Isa 51:17,22; Jer 25:15) and of one’s appointed lot; here it names Jesus’ impending suffering and death, the same cup he prays over in Gethsemane (14:36) and shares at the Last Supper (14:23-24).“kielich” — High/Critical. Risk: Polish “kielich” is also the standard liturgical term for the Eucharistic chalice in the Catholic Mass. Teaching must anchor 10:38 firmly to the OT cup-of-suffering/wrath background, not let it default to a purely liturgical/Eucharistic association that would blunt the passage’s point about the cost of discipleship.
βάπτισμα / βαπτίζομαι (βαπτίζω)baptisma / baptizomaibaptism / to be baptized; literally, to be immersed, plunged, overwhelmedritual immersion; metaphorically, to be overwhelmed by suffering or calamity”baptism,” “immersion”Used metaphorically here for being overwhelmed by suffering and death — parallel and synonymous with “the cup” in this verse. Not a reference to the ritual sacrament in this instance.”chrzest” / “być ochrzczonym” — Critical. NOT YET in baseline TM (Romans never uses this term); must be added. Primary risk: Polish Catholic sacramental theology treats “chrzest” as conferring grace/church membership via infant rite. Mark 10:38-39 uses the term metaphorically for suffering, entirely distinct from the sacrament; this metaphorical sense must be explicitly taught to prevent readers importing sacramental categories into the passage.

Mark 10:39 — “οἱ δὲ εἶπαν αὐτῷ, Δυνάμεθα. ὁ δὲ Ἰησοῦς εἶπεν αὐτοῖς, Τὸ ποτήριον ὃ ἐγὼ πίνω πίεσθε, καὶ τὸ βάπτισμα ὃ ἐγὼ βαπτίζομαι βαπτισθήσεσθε·”

Reuses ποτήριον and βάπτισμα (v.38); no new terms. Theological note: Jesus confirms (rather than denies) that James and John will share his suffering — church tradition holds James was martyred (Acts 12:2) and John endured exile/suffering — directly serving the “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear” doctrine: the disciples’ confident “we are able” (δυνάμεθα) is affirmed but redirected from triumphalist ambition toward costly faithfulness.

Mark 10:40 — “τὸ δὲ καθίσαι ἐκ δεξιῶν μου ἢ ἐξ εὐωνύμων οὐκ ἔστιν ἐμὸν δοῦναι, ἀλλ᾽ οἷς ἡτοίμασται.”

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
ἡτοίμασται (ἑτοιμάζω)hētoimastaiit has been preparedto make ready, arrange in advance”prepared,” “appointed”Assigns final determination of honor to the Father’s sovereign prerogative, not the Son’s independent decision — a note of the Son’s voluntary, relational submission to the Father’s plan (functional, not ontological, subordination) that must be handled with the same care as other Trinitarian texts; must not be read as denying Christ’s full deity.”przygotowane” — High. Flag for theologian review alongside other Sonship-of-Christ passages; ensure teaching material clarifies this is relational/mission submission, not a statement about Christ’s essential nature.

Mark 10:41 — “Καὶ ἀκούσαντες οἱ δέκα ἤρξαντο ἀγανακτεῖν περὶ Ἰακώβου καὶ Ἰωάννου.”

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
ἀγανακτεῖν (ἀγανακτέω)aganakteinto be indignant, angry, resentfulstrong displeasure/outrage”indignant,” “angry,” “resentful”The other ten disciples’ anger is not righteous zeal but shared ambition exposed — all twelve, not just James and John, are implicated in the status-seeking Jesus is about to correct.”obruszyli się” / “gniewali się” — Medium. Ensure the term conveys peer rivalry/jealousy, not mere disapproval.

Mark 10:42 — “καὶ προσκαλεσάμενος αὐτοὺς ὁ Ἰησοῦς λέγει αὐτοῖς, Οἴδατε ὅτι οἱ δοκοῦντες ἄρχειν τῶν ἐθνῶν κατακυριεύουσιν αὐτῶν καὶ οἱ μεγάλοι αὐτῶν κατεξουσιάζουσιν αὐτῶν.”

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
τῶν ἐθνῶν (ἔθνος)tōn ethnōnof the nations/peoplesnon-Jewish peoples; in political contexts, simply “the nations/Gentile world""the Gentiles,” “the nations”(baseline term “gentiles” = “poganie” exists, but flagged here for a context-sensitive override). This occurrence is the purely political/secular sense — “rulers of the [Gentile/secular] nations” — not a religious contrast of pagan belief vs. true faith.”narody” — High. The baseline glossary itself warns that Polish “poganie” over-translates ethnē with a stronger negative religious charge than the Greek carries. Here that risk is acute: “poganie” would wrongly imply the critique is of pagan religion rather than of worldly political power structures as such. Recommend “narody” (nations), not “poganie,” at Mark 10:42 — a deliberate, documented deviation from the default gentiles-mapping, justified by context.
κατακυριεύουσιν (κατακυριεύω)katakyrieuousinlord over, dominate, exercise harsh masteryintensified/negative form of κύριος-root; domineering rule”lord it over,” “dominate”Built on the same root as κύριος (“Lord” — baseline term for Christ, “Pan”), but used here pejoratively of worldly rulers’ oppressive domination — a deliberate contrast Mark draws between illegitimate domineering “lordship” and Christ’s true, self-giving Lordship.”panują nad nimi (z całą surowością)” / “gnębią ich” — High. Risk: translators must avoid vocabulary that would echo the positive title “Pan” used for Christ (baseline Critical term) in a way that blurs the contrast; prefer a rendering distinct from “Pan”-family vocabulary, e.g. “panują nad nimi w sposób despotyczny” or “gnębią,” to keep worldly domination linguistically distinguishable from Christ’s Lordship.
κατεξουσιάζουσιν (κατεξουσιάζω)katexousiazousinexercise authority over, lord it overintensified negative form of ἐξουσία-root”exercise authority over,” “lord it over”Same root (ἐξουσία, “authority”) elsewhere applied positively to Jesus’ authority over sickness, sin, and nature (see Ch.1, Ch.2 below); here applied negatively to worldly rulers. The contrast is a deliberate two-edged use of the same term Mark uses for one of the curriculum’s own doctrines (“Jesus’ Authority over Sickness, Sin, and Nature”).“sprawują nad nimi władzę” — High. Must be taught alongside the “ἐξουσία” glossary entry (below) so students see the same Greek root used for both illegitimate worldly control and Christ’s legitimate divine authority.
μεγάλοι (μέγας)megaloigreat onesthose of high rank/status”the great,” “the important”Sets up the immediate reversal in vv.43-44 (“whoever wants to become great among you…”).“wielcy” — Medium.

Mark 10:43 — “οὐχ οὕτως δέ ἐστιν ἐν ὑμῖν, ἀλλ᾽ ὃς ἂν θέλῃ μέγας γενέσθαι ἐν ὑμῖν, ἔσται ὑμῶν διάκονος,“

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
διάκονοςdiakonosservant, one who waits on/attends to another, ministertable-waiter/attendant; by extension, any servant or minister; later becomes the technical office “deacon""servant,” “minister,” “deacon”The first, lesser degree of the servanthood Jesus prescribes as the true path to greatness — directly serves the “Servanthood versus Worldly Greatness” doctrine.”sługa” — High. NOT in baseline (Romans TM lacks this term). Critical distinction to preserve for Phase 2: Polish also has the loanword “diakon” (the ordained church office); this generic ethical sense in Mark 10:43 must use the common noun “sługa,” not “diakon,” to avoid implying an institutional office is in view.

Mark 10:44 — “καὶ ὃς ἂν θέλῃ ‹ἐν ὑμῖν› εἶναι πρῶτος, ἔσται πάντων δοῦλος·“

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
πρῶτοςprōtosfirstfirst in order, rank, or importance”first,” “foremost”Continues Mark’s repeated first/last reversal motif (cf. 9:35).“pierwszy” — Medium.
δοῦλοςdoulosslave, bondservant (unqualified servitude, no rights of one’s own)involuntary bond-slave, the lowest social/legal status in the Greco-Roman world”slave,” “bondservant,” “servant” (softer English translations blunt the force)Mark escalates the demand from διάκονος (v.43, a servant who nonetheless retains some standing) to δοῦλος (v.44, total, rightless servitude) — the second, greater degree of self-emptying humility, and the exact term Paul uses of himself and, in its verbal cognate, of Christ’s self-emptying in Philippians 2:7.”niewolnik” — Critical. NOT in baseline; must be added and must be kept lexically distinct from “sługa” (v.43) to preserve Mark’s deliberate escalation from lesser to greater self-abasement. Do NOT soften to “sługa” for δοῦλος — this is a documented forbidden substitution for Mark, parallel in spirit to the baseline’s forbidden substitutions for Romans.

Mark 10:45 — “καὶ γὰρ ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου οὐκ ἦλθεν διακονηθῆναι ἀλλὰ διακονῆσαι, καὶ δοῦναι τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ λύτρον ἀντὶ πολλῶν.”

This is the theological center of the entire book of Mark — the only occurrence of λύτρον in the New Testament outside its parallel in Matthew 20:28, and the clearest single-verse fusion of every curriculum doctrine.

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
καὶ γὰρkai garfor indeedexplanatory/causal connective, grounding what precedes in Christ’s own mission”for,” “for even,” “for indeed”Signals that vv.43-44’s ethical demand is not arbitrary but grounded in Christ’s own self-understanding and mission — the servant ethic is Christological, not merely moral advice.”Bo i” / “Albowiem” — Low, but pastorally important: preserve the causal link so v.45 reads as ground, not mere illustration.
ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπουho huios tou anthrōpouthe son of the manJesus’ most frequent self-designation in the Gospels (14x in Mark alone); draws on Daniel 7:13-14’s exalted heavenly figure “given dominion, glory, and a kingdom,” while simultaneously bearing ordinary human/mortal connotations, allowing Jesus to speak of both his coming suffering and his future glory under one title”Son of Man”The title fuses the Suffering Servant and exalted heavenly-ruler strands into a single identity — precisely the tension the curriculum doctrine “Jesus as the Suffering Servant and Son of God” names. Distinguish sharply from “Son of God” (baseline Critical term, “Syn Boży”): “Son of Man” is Jesus’ preferred self-designation emphasizing his human/incarnate, suffering identity fulfilling Daniel 7, not a lesser title but a complementary one.”Syn Człowieczy” — Critical. NOT in baseline (Romans never uses this title). Standard, established rendering across Polish Bible tradition (Biblia Tysiąclecia, Biblia Warszawska, Biblia Gdańska all use “Syn Człowieczy”). Risk: must not be flattened into a generic “son of a human being” or confused with “Syn Boży”; must be taught with its Daniel 7 background so its paradox (humiliation + exaltation) is not lost.
οὐκ ἦλθεν (ἔρχομαι)ouk ēlthendid not cometo come, arrive; here with implied prior existence/sending”did not come,” “has not come”Implies a conscious, purposeful mission from a prior state — an incarnational claim (cf. baseline “incarnation” doctrine) compressed into a single verb.”nie przyszedł” — Medium-High. Preserve as intentional-mission language, not merely “he did not arrive to be served” in a flat, non-purposive sense.
διακονηθῆναι / διακονῆσαι (διακονέω)diakonēthēnai / diakonēsaito be served / to serve (passive infinitive / active infinitive of same verb)to wait on, attend to, minister to (either as recipient or as agent)“to be served” / “to serve”The passive/active infinitive pairing is Mark’s sharpest single grammatical device for the servanthood doctrine: Christ, though entitled to be served (as Son of Man, cf. Daniel 7’s dominion), reverses the expected direction of service.”aby Mu służono… ale aby służyć” — High. The passive/active contrast must be visibly preserved in Polish (e.g., “nie przyszedł, aby Mu służono, lecz aby służyć”) — do not collapse both into one flattened verb form.
δοῦναι (δίδωμι)dounaito givegive, grant, hand over, bestow”to give”Echoes and reverses δὸς (“give [to] us,” v.37): the disciples demanded a gift for themselves; Christ instead gives himself.”dać” / “oddać” — High structurally (see v.37 note); preserve the verbal echo across the passage.
τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ (ψυχή)tēn psychēn autouhis soul/life/selfthe whole life-principle of a person; can mean physical life, the inner self/soul, or the whole person, depending on context”his life,” “his soul,” “himself”Denotes the totality of Christ’s life laid down, not merely his biological existence — the object given as the ransom-price.”swoje życie” — High. Standard Polish Bible rendering (“dać swoje życie”); risk is that “życie” alone may read as merely biological, whereas the Greek ψυχή carries the fuller sense of “his whole self/soul.” A teaching note should supply this fuller nuance without introducing a second, competing Polish term.
λύτρονlytronransom, redemption pricethe price paid to buy back a slave’s freedom or to redeem a captive/hostage; the technical term for a manumission/ransom payment in the Greco-Roman world; LXX background: God’s redemption (e.g., Exodus deliverance imagery) and Isaiah 53’s Suffering Servant “bearing” and “being cut off for” the sins of many”ransom,” “redemption price,” “price of release”The single most theologically loaded word in the passage — Christ’s death is a substitutionary payment that secures release/freedom, directly grounding the curriculum doctrine “The Ransom for Many” and anchoring “The Necessity of the Cross.” Must retain the commercial/transactional force (a price paid) rather than being softened to a vague “sacrifice” or “gift.""okup” — Critical. NOT in baseline (Romans does not use this precise term, though its underlying doctrine parallels the baseline’s “imputed righteousness” and “justification” entries in doctrinal weight). Standard, established Polish rendering across all major traditions. Absolute enforcement required: never substitute a vaguer term such as “dar” (gift) or “ofiara” (offering/sacrifice alone) without also retaining “okup,” since only “okup” carries the price-paid-for-release sense essential to the doctrine.
ἀντὶ πολλῶνanti pollōninstead of/in place of manyἀντί = substitution preposition (“in place of,” “instead of,” as opposed to ὑπέρ, “on behalf of”); πολλῶν = “many,” echoing Isaiah 53:11-12 LXX (“he shall bear their sins,” “he was numbered among the many”)“for many,” “in place of many,” “instead of many”The preposition ἀντί specifically conveys substitution — Christ’s life given in the place of the many, not merely for their benefit in a general sense — the grammatical heart of substitutionary atonement doctrine, and a direct verbal echo of the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53.”za wielu” / “w zamian za wielu” — Critical. Standard Polish rendering “za wielu” is well-established (Biblia Tysiąclecia), but the substitutionary force of ἀντί can be lost if “za” is read merely as “for the benefit of” rather than “in place of.” Teaching materials must make the substitutionary sense explicit alongside the standard rendering; consider a translator’s note rather than an alternate Polish word, to preserve consistency with established Bible tradition while safeguarding the doctrine.

Synthesis of Mark 10:35-45 for Phase 2: This unit requires an unusually dense concentration of Critical-risk terms in a single passage (Syn Człowieczy, okup, za wielu, niewolnik) alongside several High-risk terms (sługa, kielich, chrzest, władza-related vocabulary, przygotowane). Every segment touching vv.38-39 (cup/baptism) and v.45 (Son of Man/ransom/for many) must be routed to human theologian review per the escalation rules established in the baseline 12_ai_translation_requirements.md, extended to Mark’s new Critical terms.


PART 2 — CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER STUDY OF THE WHOLE BOOK OF MARK

Chapter 1 — Foundational vocabulary: Gospel, Son of God, Kingdom, Authority, Repentance

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
εὐαγγέλιον (1:1,1:14-15)euangeliongood newsauthoritative proclamation of a decisive, saving event”gospel,” “good news”(baseline — reuse exactly: “Ewangelia,” High). Mark 1:1 is the programmatic title of the entire book: “The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God.""Ewangelia” — High, per baseline.
Υἱοῦ Θεοῦ (1:1, 1:11)Huiou TheouSon of Godsee baseline entry”Son of God”(baseline — reuse exactly: “Syn Boży,” Critical). Establishes Mark’s Christology from the opening verse; reaffirmed at the baptism (1:11, voice from heaven) and will bookend the Gospel at 15:39 (centurion’s confession).”Syn Boży” — Critical, per baseline.
υἱός ἀγαπητός (1:11)huios agapētosbeloved sonterm of unique filial love/favor”beloved Son,” “my Son, whom I love”New composite term for Mark: reinforces the uniqueness of Christ’s Sonship (distinct from the adoptive sonship of believers, cf. baseline note on “son_of_god”). Recurs at the Transfiguration (9:7) and in the vineyard parable (12:6).”Syn umiłowany” — Critical (tie to baseline Sonship-of-Christ doctrine).
μετάνοια / μετανοέω (1:4, 1:15)metanoia / metanoeōchange of mind/heart; to turn aroundinward reorientation of the whole person toward God, not merely regret or ritual penance”repentance,” “repent,” “turn”John’s baptism and Jesus’ own preaching both call for μετάνοια as the necessary human response to the in-breaking Kingdom.”nawrócenie” / “nawracać się” — Critical. NOT in baseline. Established Polish Bible rendering (Biblia Tysiąclecia: “Nawracajcie się i wierzcie w Ewangelię,” Mk 1:15). Risk: Polish Catholic culture strongly associates the cognate “pokuta” with the sacrament of Penance/Confession (Sakrament Pokuty i Pojednania); “nawrócenie” must be used instead of “pokuta” to preserve the NT sense of inward, decisive turning rather than the sacramental penitential system.
βάπτισμα μετανοίας (1:4)baptisma metanoiasbaptism of repentanceJohn’s specific rite, marking repentance, distinct from later Christian baptism and from the Catholic sacrament”baptism of repentance”See “chrzest” entry (core passage v.38); here the term is used in its literal ritual sense (unlike its metaphorical use in 10:38-39).“chrzest nawrócenia/pokuty” — High. Same underlying risk as the core-passage entry; here, additionally, must be distinguished from later, fuller “baptism in the Holy Spirit” that Jesus brings (1:8).
κηρύσσω (1:4,1:7,1:14,1:38-39)kēryssōto proclaim, herald, announce publiclyofficial, authoritative public proclamation”preach,” “proclaim,” “herald”The verb of both John’s and Jesus’ public ministry; grounds the “evangelism” doctrine already flagged in the baseline.”głosić” — Medium. Standard term; low collision risk, though should be kept distinct from confrontational “ewangelizacja” framing per baseline note on Catholic-Evangelical sensitivity.
ἐξουσία (1:22, 1:27)exousiaauthoritydelegated right/power to act, as distinct from raw force”authority,” “power”First appearance of a key Markan term: Jesus teaches and casts out demons “with authority” (κατ᾽ ἐξουσίαν), astonishing hearers who contrast him with the scribes. Directly grounds the curriculum doctrine “Jesus’ Authority over Sickness, Sin, and Nature.""władza” — High. NOT in baseline (baseline’s “power_of_god” = “moc Boża” translates δύναμις, a related but distinct word). Risk: modern Polish “władza” carries strong political/governmental connotations (heightened by 20th-century communist-era usage); teaching must clarify this is divine, not political, authority. Note the ironic negative reuse of the same root at Mark 10:42 (κατεξουσιάζουσιν) — see core passage.
πνεῦμα ἀκάθαρτον / δαιμόνιον (1:23-27,1:32-34,1:39)pneuma akatharton / daimonionunclean spirit / demona malevolent spiritual entity in view throughout Mark’s exorcism narratives”unclean spirit,” “demon,” “evil spirit”Demonic recognition of Jesus’ identity (“the Holy One of God,” 1:24) ironically anticipates the human confessions Mark withholds until later (Messianic Secret).“duch nieczysty” / “demon” — Medium. Standard terms; note Poland’s strong folk-Catholic exorcism tradition (well-publicized contemporary exorcists) — teaching should keep focus on Christ’s unique authority, not popular exorcism practice.
ὁ ἅγιος τοῦ θεοῦ (1:24)ho hagios tou theouthe Holy One of Goda unique divine title”the Holy One of God”Spoken by an unclean spirit — an ironic, premature, and suppressed confession of Jesus’ true identity, part of the Messianic Secret pattern.”Święty Boży” — High. Related to baseline “holy” (święty) but here functions as a distinct title; must be flagged alongside the Messianic Secret doctrine.
ἐπιτιμάω / φιμώθητι (1:25, elsewhere)epitimaō / phimōthētito rebuke / “be silenced/muzzled”sharp command to cease speaking or acting”rebuke,” “be silent,” “be muzzled”First instance of Jesus silencing a premature confession of his identity — inaugurates the recurring Messianic Secret command pattern (see also 1:34, 1:44, 3:12, 5:43, 7:36, 8:30, 9:9).“nakazał mu surowo” / “zamilcz” — Medium-High. Recommend a single consistent Polish verb-pattern across all Messianic Secret occurrences (e.g., “przykazał surowo, aby nikomu nie mówił”) for pedagogical consistency; flag doctrine explicitly.
σπλαγχνίζομαι (1:41)splagchnizomaito be moved with compassion (lit. “in one’s inward parts/bowels”)visceral, deeply-felt compassion”moved with compassion,” “pity,” “deep compassion”Describes Jesus’ inner emotional response preceding a healing — grounds the human, incarnate compassion behind his authority over sickness.”ogarnęła Go litość / użalił się” — Medium. Must convey visceral depth, not superficial politeness.
εὐθύς (recurring, 1:10,1:12,1:18,1:21,1:29,1:42, etc.)euthysimmediately, at onceMark’s signature stylistic marker of urgency”immediately,” “at once,” “straightaway”Stylistic device reinforcing the “Kingdom of God Breaking In” doctrine — the narrative itself moves with the urgency of the in-breaking Kingdom.”natychmiast” / “zaraz” — Low, but note for translators as a recurring stylistic feature (used ~40+ times in Mark) worth flagging for register consistency across the whole book.
ἤγγικεν (1:15, ἐγγίζω)ēngikenhas drawn near, has come neara perfect tense verb conveying an event that has arrived and whose effects are now present”is at hand,” “has come near,” “has drawn near""The kingdom of God has drawn near” (ἤγγικεν ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ) — the thesis statement of Mark’s Gospel, paralleling Romans 1:16-17’s thesis-statement status in the baseline package. Directly names the “Kingdom of God Breaking In” doctrine.”przybliżyło się” — High. Must preserve the perfect-tense sense of an event that has already begun to arrive and remains presently in force (already/not-yet tension) — neither purely future (“will come”) nor fully consummated (“has arrived completely”).
βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ (1:15)basileia tou theoukingdom of Godsee baseline entry”kingdom of God”(baseline — reuse exactly: “królestwo Boże,” Medium). First occurrence; central to Mark’s structure.”królestwo Boże” — Medium, per baseline.
πιστεύετε (1:15, πιστεύω)pisteuetebelieve!trust, place confidence in”believe”(baseline — reuse exactly, root term “faith” = “wiara,” Critical). Paired imperative with “repent” as the twin response to the in-breaking Kingdom.”wierzcie” — Critical, per baseline faith entry.
ἀκολουθέω (1:18, 2:14 etc.)akoloutheōto followliteral following; metaphorically, committed discipleship”follow,” “become a disciple”Peter, Andrew, James, John “immediately” leave their nets — total, costly discipleship, not casual interest.”iść za” / “pójść za Nim” — Medium. NOT in baseline. Risk: must preserve costly, total-life commitment; avoid a rendering suggesting casual admiration (“być fanem/zwolennikiem”).
μαθητής (implied from 1:16-20 onward; explicit from 2:15)mathētēsdisciple, learnera committed follower/apprentice, not a mere pupil”disciple”Grounds “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear” doctrine across the whole book.”uczeń” — Medium. NOT in baseline. Note: Polish “uczeń” also means an ordinary school pupil; theological weight (total, costly commitment) must be taught explicitly, not assumed from the word alone.

Chapter 2 — Forgiveness of Sins, Son of Man (first use), Sabbath authority

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
ἀφίημι ἁμαρτίας (2:5,2:7,2:9-10)aphiēmi hamartiasto release/forgive sinsto let go, release a debt or offense”forgive sins”Jesus claims divine prerogative to forgive sins directly and immediately — provokes the blasphemy charge and previews 14:64.”odpuszczać grzechy” / “przebaczać grzechy” — High. Risk: Polish Catholic sacramental practice channels the language of “odpuszczenie grzechów” through the priestly absolution formula in the Sacrament of Reconciliation; Mark 2 asserts Christ’s own direct, unmediated authority to forgive, which must not be flattened into (nor set in unnecessary opposition to) the sacramental practice — teach as Christ’s own divine prerogative, the ground of any subsequent ministry of forgiveness.
ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου (2:10, 2:28)ho huios tou anthrōpouthe Son of Mansee core passage (10:45) full entry”Son of Man”First two occurrences in Mark: 2:10 (authority to forgive sins) and 2:28 (authority over the Sabbath) — both establish Jesus’ unique divine authority through this title before its passion/suffering associations emerge later (8:31 onward).”Syn Człowieczy” — Critical, per core-passage entry; note for teaching that the title’s authoritative sense (2:10, 2:28) precedes its suffering sense (8:31ff.), and the core passage (10:45) fuses both.
ἐξουσία (2:10)exousiaauthoritysee Chapter 1 entry”authority”Reapplication of the term established in Ch.1 to the specific claim of authority to forgive sins.”władza” — High, per Ch.1 entry; reused.
κύριος τοῦ σαββάτου (2:28)kyrios tou sabbatoulord of the Sabbathmastery/authority over the Sabbath institution”lord of the Sabbath”(baseline term “lord” = “Pan” reused; new compound phrase). Jesus claims authority even over the divinely-instituted Sabbath — a direct claim to divine prerogative.”Pan szabatu” — Critical (per baseline Lordship-of-Christ entry, extended to this compound).
νηστεύω (2:18-20)nēsteuōto fastritual abstention from food as religious discipline”fast,” “fasting”Contrast between old covenant fasting practice and the “wedding” joy Jesus’ presence brings — thematic, not lexically high-risk.”pościć” — Low.
νυμφίος (2:19-20)nymphiosbridegrooma groom at a wedding; messianic self-designation”bridegroom”Jesus implicitly identifies himself as the messianic bridegroom whose presence transforms the appropriateness of fasting.”oblubieniec” — Medium.

Chapter 3 — Unforgivable sin, true family, appointing the Twelve

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
βλασφημία / βλασφημέω (3:28-29)blasphēmia / blasphēmeōblasphemy; to speak profanely againstirreverent, defiant speech against God’s person or Spirit”blasphemy,” “blaspheme""Whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit” — the “eternal/unforgivable sin,” a doctrinally sensitive passage requiring careful, pastorally responsible handling (not to be used to induce despair over ordinary doubt or sin).“bluźnierstwo” / “bluźnić” — High. Standard term; pastoral-doctrinal caution required in teaching material, not lexical difficulty.
Πνεῦμα τὸ Ἅγιον (3:29)Pneuma to Hagionthe Holy Spiritsee baseline”Holy Spirit”(baseline — reuse exactly: “Duch Święty,” Critical).”Duch Święty” — Critical, per baseline.
ἀπόστολος (implied, 3:14)apostolosone sent out, apostlesee baseline”apostle”(baseline — reuse exactly: “apostoł,” Low). Jesus appoints the Twelve, giving them authority (ἐξουσία, 3:15) to cast out demons, previewing 6:7.”apostoł” — Low, per baseline.
ἀδελφός / μήτηρ (3:33-35)adelphos / mētērbrother / motherkinship terms, here redefined”brother,” “mother”Jesus redefines true family as “whoever does the will of God” — theme relevant to Christian-identity-in-Christ doctrine (parallel to the baseline Romans concern about identity in Christ vs. inherited identity, here inherited biological/family identity).“brat” / “matka” — Medium. Note thematic parallel to baseline’s Romans concern about identity “in Christ” superseding inherited (in Poland’s case, national-Catholic) identity — worth a cross-curriculum teaching note.

Chapter 4 — Parables of the Kingdom, Mystery, authority over nature (first nature miracle)

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
παραβολή (4:2,4:10-11,4:33-34, and throughout)parabolēparablea placing-alongside; a short illustrative story or comparison”parable,” “illustration”Jesus’ primary teaching mode for Kingdom truths — conceals from the crowds while revealing to disciples, another Messianic-Secret-adjacent device (hiddenness/disclosure).“przypowieść” — Low. Standard, well-established term.
μυστήριον (4:11)mystērionmystery, secretthat which is hidden until revealed by disclosure, not humanly discoverable”mystery,” “secret""The mystery of the kingdom of God” given to insiders; those outside receive only parables.”tajemnica” — Medium. Risk: Polish Catholic devotional vocabulary strongly associates “tajemnica” with the Rosary’s “tajemnice różańcowe” (mysteries of the Rosary) and sacramental “mysteries”; Mark’s sense (a hidden truth of the in-breaking Kingdom, now disclosed to disciples) should be taught distinctly from that devotional association.
βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ (4:11,4:26,4:30)basileia tou theoukingdom of Godsee baseline”kingdom of God”Three parables (sower, growing seed, mustard seed) all describe the Kingdom’s hidden, organic, yet certain growth — reinforcing “Kingdom of God Breaking In” as gradual as well as sudden.”królestwo Boże” — Medium, per baseline; reused.
ἐπιτίμησεν τῷ ἀνέμῳ (4:39)epetimēsen tō anemōhe rebuked the windsame verb ἐπιτιμάω used of demons (1:25) now used of the storm”rebuked the wind”Jesus’ authority (ἐξουσία, implied though not the exact noun here) extends to nature itself — directly grounds “Jesus’ Authority over … Nature.""rozkazał wichrowi” / “zgromił wiatr” — Medium-High. Note the same verb links exorcism (Ch.1) and nature-miracle (Ch.4) vocabulary; preserve the connection where feasible.
τίς ἄρα οὗτός ἐστιν (4:41)tis ara houtos estinwho then is this?rhetorical identity question”Who then is this?”The disciples’ astonished question is the Messianic Secret’s central unanswered question, which the Gospel as a whole answers only gradually.”Kim więc On jest?” — Medium; thematic marker, not a glossary term per se, but worth flagging as recurring rhetorical device.

Chapter 5 — Authority over demons and death; σῴζω’s dual meaning

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
δαιμόνια / Λεγιών (5:1-20)daimonia / Legiōndemons / “Legion”see Ch.1 entry; “Legion” = a Roman military unit’s name, taken as the demon horde’s self-designation”demons,” “Legion”The Gerasene demoniac exorcism dramatizes Christ’s authority extending even beyond Jewish territory (Gentile region), previewing the Gospel’s wider mission scope.”demony” / “Legion” (proper name, transliterated) — Medium/Low respectively.
σῴζω (5:23,5:28,5:34)sōzōto save, heal, deliver, make wholeranges seamlessly between physical healing/rescue and spiritual salvation — a single Greek verb Mark deliberately exploits for both senses”save,” “heal,” “make well,” “deliver""Your faith has made/saved you well” (ἡ πίστις σου σέσωκέν σε, 5:34) — the same verb used for the woman’s physical healing is the New Testament’s standard verb for spiritual salvation, inviting hearers to see physical healing as a sign pointing toward the fuller salvation Christ brings. Directly serves “Jesus’ Authority over Sickness … ” and “Faith and Discipleship” doctrines together.”uzdrowić” (physical) / “zbawić” (spiritual) — High. NOT in baseline (though baseline’s “salvation” = “zbawienie” is the noun cognate). Polish requires two distinct verbs where Greek uses one, risking the loss of Mark’s deliberate wordplay; teaching material must make explicit that σῴζω’s healing/salvation double-sense is a deliberate authorial signal, best preserved with a translator’s note rather than an artificial single Polish verb.
πίστις (5:34, 5:36)pistisfaithsee baseline”faith”(baseline — reuse exactly: “wiara,” Critical). “Your faith has saved you” / “only believe” (5:36) — reinforces the “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear” doctrine (Jairus’s fear vs. required faith).“wiara” — Critical, per baseline; must retain personal-trust sense, not fatalistic resignation.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε (5:36)mē phobou, monon pisteuedo not fear, only believedirect imperative pairing fear and faith as opposites”do not be afraid; just believe”Programmatic verse for “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear” — fear and faith are presented as mutually exclusive postures toward Jesus.”Nie bój się, tylko wierz” — High (doctrine-defining verse for one of the eight curriculum doctrines; flag for consistency across all lesson materials, parallel to baseline’s insistence on identical rendering of Romans 8:28).

Chapter 6 — Sending of the Twelve, “It is I,” rejection at Nazareth

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
ἀποστέλλω (6:7)apostellōto send outcommission with delegated purpose/authority”send out”Verbal root of ἀπόστολος (baseline “apostoł”); the Twelve are sent with Jesus’ own delegated ἐξουσία (6:7) over unclean spirits.”wysłać” — Low-Medium; verbal cognate of the baseline apostle entry.
ἐξουσία (6:7)exousiaauthoritysee Ch.1 entry”authority”Delegated to the Twelve — the first extension of Christ’s authority beyond himself, previewing the church’s ongoing ministry.”władza” — High, per Ch.1 entry; reused.
προφήτης (6:4,6:15)prophētēsprophetsee baseline”prophet”(baseline — reuse exactly: “prorok,” Low). “A prophet is not without honor except in his hometown” — applied to Jesus’ rejection at Nazareth.”prorok” — Low, per baseline.
σπλαγχνίζομαι (6:34)splagchnizomaito be moved with compassionsee Ch.1 entry”compassion”Precedes the feeding of the 5,000 — compassion grounding a nature/provision miracle.”ogarnęła Go litość” — Medium, per Ch.1 entry; reused.
ἐγώ εἰμι (6:50)egō eimiI amordinary self-identification (“it is I”); but also the LXX’s rendering of God’s self-revelation to Moses (Exodus 3:14) and Isaiah’s divine self-declarations (e.g., Isa 43:10-11)“It is I,” “I am”Spoken by Jesus walking on the water, in a scene already saturated with divine-theophany imagery (walking on the sea, calming fear) — the phrase functions on two levels simultaneously: mundane reassurance and a possible echo of divine self-disclosure.”To Ja jestem” — Critical. NOT in baseline (though thematically adjacent to baseline’s “Deity of Christ” doctrine). Risk: an overly flat translation (“to ja”) could strip all possible theophanic resonance; an overly emphatic translation could overclaim a certain allusion the Greek leaves suggestively ambiguous. Recommend “To Ja jestem” (matching established Polish Bible convention) with a translator’s note flagging the possible Exodus 3:14 echo for theologian review, without asserting it dogmatically in the base text.

Chapter 7 — Tradition of the elders, true defilement, Syrophoenician woman

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
παράδοσις (7:3-5,7:8-9,7:13)paradosistradition, that which is handed downinherited teaching/practice, here specifically the Pharisaic oral tradition surrounding Torah observance”tradition”Jesus critiques human tradition that “sets aside” God’s actual command — a targeted critique of one specific tradition-system (first-century Pharisaic oral law), not a blanket statement about the value of tradition as such.”tradycja” — High. NOT in baseline. Risk: Polish Catholic theology holds Sacred Tradition (Tradycja) as a co-authoritative source of revelation alongside Scripture; this passage’s critique of “tradycja ludzka” (human tradition that nullifies God’s word) must be carefully scoped to the specific first-century target Mark names, not generalized into a polemic against the Catholic doctrine of Tradition — a distinction requiring deliberate pastoral framing in teaching material.
κοινός / ἀκάθαρτος (7:2,7:15,7:18-23)koinos / akathartoscommon/defiled / uncleanritual impurity language reapplied by Jesus to moral, heart-level defilement”unclean,” “defiled,” “common""Nothing outside a person can defile him… what comes out of a person is what defiles” — relocates true impurity from ritual to the heart, directly relevant to “sin” (baseline term, reused) as an internal, moral reality.”nieczysty” / “pokalać” — Medium. Standard terms; low lexical risk, doctrinal emphasis (heart vs. ritual) is the teaching point.
καρδία (7:19,7:21)kardiaheartthe inner moral/volitional center of a person”heart""Out of the heart come evil thoughts…” — grounds the doctrine of universal human sinfulness as internal, not merely behavioral.”serce” — Low-Medium.
κυνάρια (7:27-28)kynarialittle dogs, house-dogsa diminutive, softened form of “dogs,” used in a boundary-testing exchange”little dogs,” “puppies”The Syrophoenician woman’s exchange with Jesus previews the Gospel’s inclusion of Gentiles — thematically related to baseline’s “unity_of_jews_and_gentiles” doctrine.”szczenięta/pieski” — Low; cultural-idiomatic note required so the term is not read as a simple insult without its diminutive softening.

Chapter 8 — Second feeding, Peter’s confession, first Passion prediction, the Cross

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
Χριστός (8:29)ChristosAnointed Onesee baseline “messiah""Christ,” “Messiah”(baseline — reuse exactly: “Mesjasz,” Critical). Peter’s confession, “You are the Christ” — the Gospel’s structural turning point, after which Jesus begins openly predicting his suffering. Note: elsewhere (1:1) Χριστός functions as part of the fused proper name “Jesus Christ” (Jezus Chrystus); here (8:29) it functions as a confessional title and should render as “Mesjasz” to match baseline confessional-title usage, while 1:1’s “Jezus Chrystus” retains the name-form “Chrystus.” Flag for Phase 2 consistency review.”Mesjasz” (title, 8:29) / “Chrystus” (name-form, 1:1 etc.) — Critical, per baseline; document the dual-form policy explicitly in glossary.
ἐπιτιμᾶν (8:32-33)epitimanto rebuke, reprimand sharplysame verb used of exorcisms (1:25) and the storm (4:39), now used by Peter of Jesus, and then by Jesus of Peter”rebuke”Peter rebukes Jesus for predicting suffering; Jesus rebukes Peter as “Satan” — the sharpest confrontation in the Gospel over the necessity of the cross.”zaczął Go upominać” / “zgromił” — Medium-High; note the ironic reuse of the exorcism/nature-miracle verb in a purely human confrontation.
Σατανᾶς (8:33)SatanasSatanproper name/title for the chief adversary”Satan”Jesus identifies Peter’s resistance to the cross as satanic in character — underscores “The Necessity of the Cross” as non-negotiable.”szatan” — Low. Standard, unambiguous.
σταυρός / σταυρόν ἄρας (8:34)stauros / stauron arascross / “having taken up a cross”a Roman execution instrument; metaphorically, the call to self-denying, potentially fatal discipleship”cross,” “take up his cross”First explicit call to cross-bearing discipleship — grounds “The Necessity of the Cross” directly for all disciples, not only for Jesus.”krzyż” / “weźmie swój krzyż” — Critical. NOT in baseline (Romans never introduces this specific term, though Romans 6 deals with union with Christ’s death). Risk: the omnipresence of the crucifix (“krzyż”) in Polish Catholic visual/devotional culture (worn, displayed in homes and schools, roadside shrines) risks the term becoming a familiar cultural/decorative icon rather than carrying its full weight of costly, self-denying, potentially fatal discipleship — teaching material must reactivate the term’s original violent, costly force.
ψυχή (8:35-37)psychēsoul, life, selfsee core-passage entry”life,” “soul""Whoever wants to save his life (ψυχή) will lose it…” — the same term as 10:45’s ransom verse, showing Mark’s structural link between cross-bearing discipleship (Ch.8) and Christ’s own ransom-death (Ch.10).“życie/dusza” — High, per core-passage entry; note structural link across Ch.8 and Ch.10 for teaching material.
ἐπαισχύνομαι (8:38)epaischynomaito be ashamed ofto feel shame in relation to a person or message”be ashamed”Warns against shame-based apostasy under social pressure — relevant to “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear.""wstydzić się” — Medium.
δόξα (8:38)doxaglorysee baseline”glory”(baseline — reuse exactly: “chwała,” Medium/High per baseline’s Deity-of-Christ note). Son of Man’s future coming “in the glory of his Father” — links suffering (present) and glory (future) as one unified Son-of-Man identity.”chwała” — reused per baseline.

Chapter 9 — Transfiguration, unbelief and faith, warnings about sin (Gehenna)

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
μετεμορφώθη (9:2, μεταμορφόω)metemorphōthēhe was transfigured, transformed in forma visible change of outward appearance revealing inner glory/divine nature”was transfigured”Momentary unveiling of Christ’s divine glory to three disciples — directly serves “Jesus as … Son of God” doctrine, and stands in deliberate narrative tension with the surrounding suffering predictions.”przemienił się” — High. Standard Polish rendering; theologically significant as a preview of resurrection glory bracketed by passion predictions (8:31; 9:31).
οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός (9:7)houtos estin ho huios mou ho agapētosthis is my beloved Sondivine voice from the cloud”This is my beloved Son”(baseline “son_of_god” reused; also links to Ch.1’s “Syn umiłowany” entry). Second of three divine voice-confirmations of Sonship in Mark (1:11; 9:7; implied at 15:39’s human confirmation).”To jest Syn mój umiłowany” — Critical, per baseline.
πιστεύω / ἀπιστία (9:23-24)pisteuō / apistiato believe / unbelieftrust vs. its absence”believe” / “unbelief”The father’s cry, “I believe; help my unbelief!” — a paradigmatic statement of “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear,” modeling faith that coexists with acknowledged weakness rather than requiring prior perfection.”wierzę, pomóż niedowiarstwu memu” — High (doctrine-defining verse for the Faith-amid-Fear doctrine; recommend fixed, consistent rendering across all lesson materials).
σκανδαλίζω (9:42-47)skandalizōto cause to stumble, to trip up, to cause to sinto be an occasion of moral/spiritual downfall for another”cause to stumble,” “cause to sin”Series of severe warnings about causing others (or oneself) to sin, using amputation hyperbole — serves the doctrine of the seriousness of sin.”prowadzić do zgorszenia/grzechu” — Medium.
γέεννα (9:43,9:45,9:47)geennaGehennaa valley near Jerusalem (Hinnom) associated with judgment/burning, used as the standard NT image for final judgment/hell”hell,” “Gehenna”Concrete, geographically-rooted judgment imagery, distinct from generalized folk notions of “piekło.""Gehenna” (transliterated, with explanatory note) or “piekło” (per established Bible convention) — Medium. Recommend transliteration with a footnote on first occurrence to preserve the concrete OT/geographic background, since “piekło” alone risks importing Polish folk-cultural (Dante-influenced) imagery not present in the Greek term.

Chapter 10 — (Core passage is vv.35-45, treated fully in Part 1 above.) Remaining chapter content: marriage, children and the Kingdom, the rich man, Son of David

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
παιδία (10:14-15)paidialittle childrenyoung children, used as a model of Kingdom-receptivity”children""Whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child will not enter it” — the Kingdom is received by dependent trust, not achievement, directly relevant to “Faith and Discipleship” and the surrounding rich-man pericope’s critique of self-reliant merit.”dzieci” — Low-Medium.
ζωὴν αἰώνιον (10:17,10:30)zōēn aiōnioneternal lifelife of the age to come, qualitatively and temporally unending”eternal life”The rich man’s question (“what must I do to inherit eternal life?”) and Jesus’ answer frame the whole discipleship-and-possessions unit leading directly into the core passage’s servanthood teaching.”życie wieczne” — High. NOT in baseline (Romans discusses “salvation”/“zbawienie” but not this exact phrase). Risk: must not be read as automatically secured by religious observance/almsgiving (the rich man’s implicit assumption) — connects to baseline’s broader caution about merit-based assumptions concerning salvation.
υἱὸς Δαυίδ (10:47-48)huios Dauidson of Davida royal-messianic title invoking the Davidic covenant”Son of David”Bartimaeus’s cry — a public, unrebuked messianic confession (contrast the Messianic Secret’s usual suppression), signaling the approach of the Jerusalem/Passion narrative where secrecy begins to lift.”Syn Dawida” — High. Related to, but distinct from, baseline’s “seed_of_david” (“potomek Dawida”); recommend “Syn Dawida” as the fixed rendering for this specific messianic-address formula, kept distinguishable from the baseline’s genealogical phrase.
πίστις σέσωκέν σε (10:52)pistis sesōken seyour faith has saved/healed yousee Ch.5 σῴζω entry”your faith has healed/saved you”Repetition of the healing/salvation double-sense verb, bracketing the “blindness/sight” theme with the disciples’ spiritual blindness throughout Ch.8-10.”wiara twoja cię uzdrowiła/ocaliła” — High, per Ch.5 entry; reused.

Chapter 11 — Triumphal entry, temple, fig tree, authority questioned

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
ὡσαννά (11:9-10)hōsanna”save now!” (Hebrew loanword)a shout of acclamation/petition, by NT times largely a fixed liturgical exclamation”Hosanna”Crowd’s acclamation at the triumphal entry, invoking Davidic-kingdom hope; ironically precedes the crowd’s later silence/hostility during the Passion.”Hosanna” (transliterated) — Low. Familiar through Catholic liturgy (Sanctus); minimal risk.
ἱερόν (11:11,11:15-17)hierontemple (precincts)the wider temple courts, distinct from the sanctuary proper (ναός)“temple”Temple-clearing action enacts prophetic judgment on corrupted temple worship (“house of prayer” vs. “den of robbers,” quoting Isaiah 56:7/Jeremiah 7:11).“świątynia” — Medium. Standard term.
ἐξουσία (11:28-29,11:33)exousiaauthoritysee Ch.1 entry”authority”Chief priests directly interrogate the source of Jesus’ authority — the question the whole Gospel has been implicitly posing since 1:22,1:27.”władza” — High, per Ch.1 entry; reused, now made explicit as the narrative’s central question.
πίστις (11:22-24)pistisfaithsee baseline”faith""Have faith in God” — faith described with mountain-moving hyperbole, tied to prayer.”wiara” — Critical, per baseline; reused.

Chapter 12 — Parable of the tenants, greatest commandment, widow’s offering

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
παραβολή τῶν γεωργῶν (12:1-12)parabolē tōn geōrgōnparable of the tenant farmerssee Ch.4 entry for παραβολή”parable of the tenants/vineyard”Allegorizes Israel’s rejection of God’s messengers, climaxing in the rejection of “the beloved son” (ὁ υἱός ὁ ἀγαπητός, 12:6) — direct echo of 1:11/9:7’s divine-Sonship language, now cast in a narrative of rejection anticipating the Passion.”przypowieść o dzierżawcach/rolnikach” — Medium; note the deliberate echo of “beloved son” vocabulary.
κεφαλὴ γωνίας (12:10)kephalē gōniashead of the corner, cornerstonethe key structural stone in ancient construction”cornerstone”Quotation of Psalm 118:22 applied to Christ’s rejection-then-vindication — messianic proof-text.”kamień węgielny/głowicy” — Medium.
ἀγαπήσεις (12:30-31, ἀγαπάω)agapēseisyou shall loveself-giving, willed love, not merely emotion”love”The Great Commandment (love God, love neighbor) — foundational ethical summary undergirding “Servanthood versus Worldly Greatness.""będziesz miłował” — Medium. NOT in baseline; standard, low ambiguity in Polish Bible tradition, though catechesis should distinguish from romantic/sentimental “miłość.”
πλησίον (12:31)plēsionneighborone nearby; in context, any person encountered, not merely a literal neighbor”neighbor”Universalizes the scope of love beyond in-group boundaries — related to baseline’s unity-of-Jews-and-Gentiles concerns.”bliźni” — Low-Medium.
Καῖσαρ (12:14-17)KaisarCaesarthe Roman emperor”Caesar""Render to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s” — establishes a framework for civic-authority questions (cf. baseline’s flagged sensitivity around Romans 13’s government-authority passages).”Cezar” — Low lexically; doctrinally Medium given church-state discussion sensitivity in a Polish historical context (partitions, communism) already noted in the baseline.

Chapter 13 — Olivet Discourse: eschatology, false messiahs, the Son of Man’s coming

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
θλῖψις (13:19,13:24)thlipsistribulation, afflictionsevere distress/suffering”tribulation,” “affliction”Describes the unprecedented distress preceding the end — relevant background for “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear.""ucisk” — Medium.
ψευδόχριστοι / ψευδοπροφῆται (13:22)pseudochristoi / pseudoprophētaifalse christs / false prophetscounterfeit messianic and prophetic claimants”false christs,” “false prophets”Warns against deception regarding Christ’s identity — reinforces the uniqueness of the true Χριστός (baseline “Mesjasz,” Critical) against imitators.”fałszywi mesjasze / fałszywi prorocy” — Medium-High (ties directly to baseline Critical messiah entry).
ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ἐρχόμενος ἐν δόξῃ (13:26)ho huios tou anthrōpou erchomenos en doxēthe Son of Man coming in glorysee core-passage entry”the Son of Man coming in glory”Final, fully-glorious appearance of the Son of Man, completing the trajectory begun at 8:38 and reaching its ground in 10:45’s suffering-then-glory pattern.”Syn Człowieczy przychodzący w chwale” — Critical, per core-passage entry; reused.
γρηγορεῖτε (13:33-37)grēgoreitewatch! be alert!stay awake, be vigilant”watch,” “be alert,” “stay awake”Repeated imperative closing the discourse — eschatological vigilance as the appropriate disciple posture, linking eschatology back to “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear.""czuwajcie” — Low-Medium.

Chapter 14 — Last Supper, Gethsemane, betrayal, trial

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
διαθήκη (14:24)diathēkēcovenantsee baseline”covenant”(baseline — reuse exactly: “przymierze,” High). “This is my blood of the covenant, poured out for many” (τὸ αἷμα… τὸ ἐκχυννόμενον ὑπὲρ πολλῶν) — note the parallel to 10:45’s “for many” (ἀντὶ πολλῶν there; ὑπέρ here — a different preposition, “on behalf of,” worth a brief translator’s note distinguishing ἀντί’s substitution-force from ὑπέρ’s benefit-force, both converging on the same “many”).“przymierze” — High, per baseline; reused. Note the ἀντί/ὑπέρ distinction for theologian review.
ποτήριον (14:23,14:36)potērioncupsee core-passage entry”cup”Both the Eucharistic cup (14:23, literal) and the Gethsemane cup of suffering (14:36, metaphorical, echoing 10:38) — the two senses converge here, making explicit what 10:38 anticipated.”kielich” — High/Critical, per core-passage entry; reused, now with the added complexity of both literal and metaphorical uses appearing within the same chapter.
Ἀββά ὁ Πατήρ (14:36)Abba ho PatērAbba, Fathersee baseline”Abba, Father”(baseline — reuse exactly: “Abba,” paired with “Ojcze,” Medium). Jesus’ own Gethsemane prayer uses the identical intimate address later applied to believers in Romans 8:15 — a direct thematic bridge between the two curricula.”Abba, Ojcze” — Medium, per baseline; reused exactly.
παραδίδωμι (14:10-11,14:18,14:21,14:41-44)paradidōmito hand over, deliver up, betrayto give into another’s power/control; ranges from neutral “handing over” to treacherous “betrayal” depending on agent and context”betray,” “hand over,” “deliver up”The verb threading the entire Passion narrative — used of Judas’s betrayal but also, theologically, of the Father’s/Son’s own giving-over of the Son to death (echoing Isaiah 53:6,12 LXX, “the Lord handed him over”). Distinguish from the narrower “betray” (used specifically of Judas’s personal treachery) to preserve the theological thread of divine purpose running through human treachery.”wydać” — High. NOT in baseline. Recommend consistent “wydać” across the Passion narrative to preserve the theological thread (echoing “ransom”/“for many” theology), reserving “zdradzić” (betray) specifically for Judas’s personal act where the text’s focus is his treachery rather than the divine plan.
ἀρχιερεύς (14:53,14:60-61,14:63-64)archiereushigh priestthe chief religious authority in Second Temple Judaism”high priest”Presides over the trial where Jesus is condemned on the blasphemy charge tied to his Messianic/Son-of-God claims (14:61-64).“arcykapłan” — Low-Medium lexically; doctrinally significant context (trial).
υἱὸς τοῦ εὐλογητοῦ (14:61)huios tou eulogētouSon of the Blessed Onea reverent circumlocution for “Son of God""Son of the Blessed”High priest’s direct question, “Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” — provokes Jesus’ clearest self-identification in the entire Gospel (14:62, “I am”), immediately followed by the Son-of-Man-in-glory citation (Daniel 7).”Syn Błogosławionego” — Critical, tied directly to baseline Sonship/Deity-of-Christ entries.
ἀλέκτωρ / ἀπαρνέομαι (14:30,14:66-72)alektōr / aparneomairooster / to deny utterlythe rooster’s crow as fulfillment-marker; intensified form of denial”rooster,” “deny”Peter’s threefold denial, framing the doctrine of “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear” at its lowest point — paired later with restoration (implied, 16:7).“kogut” / “zaprzeć się” — Low/Medium.

Chapter 15 — Crucifixion, death, centurion’s confession

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
σταυρόω / σταυρός (15:13-15,15:20-27,15:30-32)stauroō / staurosto crucify / crosssee Ch.8 entry for σταυρός”crucify,” “cross”The narrated fulfillment of everything the “cross” sayings (8:34; 10:38-39,45) anticipated — directly grounds “The Necessity of the Cross.""ukrzyżować” / “krzyż” — Critical, per Ch.8 entry; reused.
βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων (15:2,15:9,15:12,15:18,15:26)basileus tōn IoudaiōnKing of the Jewsa title used mockingly by Roman authorities, yet Mark places it as an unwitting confession of truth”King of the Jews”Ironic royal/messianic title, mocked in the moment yet theologically accurate — ties the Passion to the earlier messianic-title material (Son of David, Christ).“król żydowski” — High. Ironic-messianic title; teach the deliberate Markan irony (mockery that speaks truth).
Ἐλωΐ Ἐλωΐ, λεμὰ σαβαχθανί (15:34)Elōi Elōi, lema sabachthani”My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (Aramaic, quoting Psalm 22:1)Jesus’ cry of dereliction, preserved untranslated in the Greek text itself before Mark supplies the Greek translation”Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani”The most theologically fraught cry in the Gospel — must be handled with the same Trinitarian care as other texts implying strain within the Godhead; orthodox teaching holds this expresses the real horror of bearing sin’s judgment without implying the Father-Son relation was ontologically severed.”Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani” (Aramaic retained, per standard Polish Bible practice of preserving transliterated Aramaic phrases as with “Abba” and “Talita kum”) — Critical. Flag for theologian review alongside “Deity of Christ” and “Sonship of Christ” doctrines; teaching material must supply careful Trinitarian framing.
ἐγκατέλιπες (ἐγκαταλείπω, 15:34)egkatelipesyou have forsaken/abandonedto leave behind, abandon, desert”forsaken,” “abandoned”See above; the specific verb bearing the doctrinal weight of the cry of dereliction.”opuściłeś” — Critical, per above.
καταπέτασμα (15:38)katapetasmathe curtain/veil (of the temple)the veil separating the Holy of Holies”curtain,” “veil”Torn “from top to bottom” at Jesus’ death — signifies opened access to God through the cross, a symbolic confirmation of “The Necessity of the Cross” and its atoning effect.”zasłona” — Medium; doctrinally significant symbol, low lexical ambiguity.
ἑκατοντάρχης (15:39)hekatontarchēscenturiona Roman military officer commanding roughly 100 soldiers”centurion”Speaks the Gospel’s climactic human confession — “Truly this man was the Son of God” (Υἱὸς Θεοῦ) — a Gentile’s confession bookending Mark 1:1’s opening title, and the first fully unequivocal human confession of Jesus’ divine Sonship in the entire book.”setnik” — Low lexically; the confession itself (“Syn Boży”) is Critical per baseline, now reused at its most climactic narrative placement.

Chapter 16 — Resurrection

GreekTransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPolish rendering & risk
ἠγέρθη (16:6, ἐγείρω)ēgerthēhe was raised, he has risenpassive verb, “he was raised [by God]” — theologically implies the Father’s action in the Son’s resurrection, distinct from ἀνέστη’s more agentive “he rose""he is risen,” “he has been raised”Angelic proclamation at the empty tomb — the climactic resolution of every suffering/glory tension the Gospel has built (8:31; 9:31; 10:33-34,45; 13:26).”Powstał” / “Zmartwychwstał” — Critical, per baseline resurrection entry (noun “zmartwychwstanie” reused; note for translators that established Polish Bible tradition sometimes renders this specific passive verb form as “Powstał” at Mk 16:6 rather than the fuller compound “Zmartwychwstał” — flag for theologian review to fix one consistent choice for this curriculum).
μνημεῖον (16:2-6)mnēmeiontomb, memoriala burial monument/tomb”tomb”The empty tomb itself, the physical evidence-datum of the resurrection.”grób” — Low.
φόβος / ἔκστασις (16:8)phobos / ekstasisfear / astonishment, amazement (bordering on trembling shock)strong emotional/psychological response”fear,” “trembling,” “amazement”Mark’s original ending (widely regarded by textual scholars as concluding at 16:8) closes on unresolved fear and silence rather than triumphant certainty — a deliberate literary-theological choice inviting the reader into the disciples’ own unfinished journey of faith amid fear, directly serving the “Faith and Discipleship amid Fear” doctrine as the Gospel’s final word.”strach” / “zdumienie” — Medium; teaching note required on Mark’s distinctive, unresolved ending.
Textual noteMark 16:9-20 (the “longer ending”) is absent from the earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus) and is widely regarded by textual scholars as a later addition; most modern Bible editions (including Polish translations) print it with a bracketed or footnoted textual note.Recommend the curriculum follow standard modern Bible practice: include vv.9-20 with a clear textual footnote rather than silently omitting or silently including it without comment, matching the practice of major Polish Bible editions (Biblia Tysiąclecia, Biblia Warszawska both footnote this).

Summary Observations for Phase 2

  1. Terms absent from Mark entirely that appear prominently in the Romans baseline: χάρις (“grace”), δικαιοσύνη (“righteousness”) as a technical forensic term, δικαίωσις (“justification”), υἱοθεσία (“adoption”), ἐκκλησία (“church” — the word never occurs in Mark), and the technical Pauline “imputed righteousness” formula. These baseline entries remain valid Language Package assets for cross-curriculum consistency (e.g., if a lesson draws a Mark-Romans connection) but are not independently generated by Mark’s own vocabulary.
  2. Terms shared with Romans and reused exactly: gospel, faith, sin, kingdom of God, glory, son of God, messiah, apostle, covenant, Holy Spirit, God, Jesus, Father, Abba, resurrection, lord, prophet, peace, election (root, see below).
  3. A new, thematically related term to baseline “election”: Mark uses the adjective ἐκλεκτός (“elect,” 13:20,13:22,13:27) rather than the baseline’s noun ἐκλογή; propose “wybrani” (the elect/chosen ones) as the companion adjectival form to baseline’s “wybranie,” High risk, same fatalism-avoidance caution as baseline.
  4. New Critical-risk terms Mark requires that Romans never introduced: Syn Człowieczy (Son of Man), okup (ransom), za wielu (substitutionary “for many”), niewolnik (slave), krzyż/ukrzyżować (cross/crucify), nawrócenie (repentance), To Ja jestem (egō eimi), Eloi Eloi lema sabachtani / opuściłeś (cry of dereliction). These require the highest tier of theologian review and are documented fully in 08_core_glossary.md.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words