Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis
This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.
Risk tier summary
| Tier | Count | Review routing | Example doctrines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 10 | Human theologian, every occurrence | Faith, Salvation, Sainthood, Prayer and Intercession, Christian Identity in Christ, Deity/Sonship/Resurrection/Lordship of Christ, Messianic Promise |
| High | 10 | Human theologian | Gospel, Grace, Incarnation, Sanctification, Assurance of Salvation, Universal Scope of the Gospel, Universal Human Accountability |
| Medium | 16 | Native speaker review | Inspiration of Scripture, Adoption, Spiritual Gifts, Unity of Jews and Gentiles, Evangelism, Church as God’s People |
| Low | 4 | Automated review only | Apostleship, Thanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship |
Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do
Poland’s Critical-risk cluster is unusual in this pipeline for including Faith and Christian Identity in Christ, doctrines that are Low or Medium risk in most other Language Packages. Here they are Critical because Polish national and Catholic religious identity are historically fused deeply enough (the Polak-katolik phenomenon) that these doctrines face a live risk of being read as inherited cultural-ethnic status rather than personal trust in and union with Christ — Romans’ own argument directly confronts this fusion. Sainthood and Prayer and Intercession are Critical for the same structural reason as in other historically Catholic Language Packages, intensified here by Poland’s exceptional Marian devotion (Częstochowa) and record-setting canonizations under John Paul II.
Review routing rationale
Critical and High risk doctrines (20 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Polish is fluent and devotionally serious without catching that it reinforces, rather than challenges, the collapse of personal faith into inherited national-religious identity. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is general cultural fit rather than a direct doctrinal or identity-conflation risk.