Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference and Theme Analysis — Titus

0. Citation Normalization Convention

For cross-referencing across curricula and languages, all citations in this document and downstream Phase 2 artifacts are recorded in normalized English book-chapter:verse form (e.g. Galatians 2:16, Genesis 15:6, Titus 2:11). This normalized form is the lookup key for translation-memory consistency checks.

For destination-text rendering, citations must convert to established Punjabi Bible book names per the baseline’s Cross-Reference Preservation Rules, extended here for every book cited in this document:

Normalized (English)Punjabi Book NameNotes
TitusਤੀਤੁਸCurriculum book
RomansਰੋਮੀਆਂBaseline curriculum
Genesisਉਤਪਤ
Exodusਕੂਚ
Numbersਗਿਣਤੀ
Deuteronomyਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਸਾਰNOTE: distinct from the doctrinal term ਬਿਵਸਥਾ (“the Law”) — this is only the book name; do not conflate in translator notes
Psalmsਜ਼ਬੂਰ
Proverbsਕਹਾਉਤਾਂ
Isaiahਯਸਾਯਾਹ
Jeremiahਯਿਰਮਿਯਾਹ
Ezekielਹਿਜ਼ਕੀਏਲ
Joelਯੋਏਲ
Malachiਮਲਾਕੀ
Markਮਰਕੁਸ
Johnਯੂਹੰਨਾ
Actsਰਸੂਲਾਂ ਦੇ ਕਰਤੱਬ
Galatiansਗਲਾਤੀਆਂ
Ephesiansਅਫ਼ਸੀਆਂ
Colossiansਕੁਲੁੱਸੀਆਂ
1 Timothy1 ਤਿਮੋਥਿਉਸ
2 Timothy2 ਤਿਮੋਥਿਉਸ
Hebrewsਇਬਰਾਨੀਆਂ
1 Peter1 ਪਤਰਸ

Citation format in destination text: ਤੀਤੁਸ 2:11 (book, chapter:verse, Arabic numerals — matching the baseline’s YouVersion-compatible convention).


1. Cross-Reference Matrix — Titus 1 (Salutation and Elder Qualifications)

Titus PassageThemeRelated Character/GroupOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Titus 1:1Divine calling, electionPaul, “God’s elect”Deuteronomy 7:6–8 (God’s chosen people); Romans 1:1, 1:6–7 (baseline ਸੱਦਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ / ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੀ ਚੋਣ)Reuse baseline ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੀ ਚੋਣ exactly; must read as God’s sovereign personal choice, never ਕਿਸਮਤ (fate) or a qaum-identity election
Titus 1:1–2Godliness (εὐσέβεια), hope, eternal life, God who cannot liePaulNumbers 23:19 (“God is not a man, that he should lie”); Romans 3:4 (“let God be true”); Hebrews 6:18ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਜੋ ਝੂਠ ਨਹੀਂ ਬੋਲਦਾ must echo the Numbers/Romans reliability-of-God theme; keep consistent phrasing with any future Numbers-curriculum rendering
Titus 1:2Promise “before the ages began”GodGenesis 3:15 (protoevangelium, the first promise); 2 Timothy 1:9; Ephesians 1:4Linear, historical promise-and-fulfillment frame; must not be read through a cyclical cosmic-age (yuga) lens
Titus 1:3Proclamation entrusted to Paul; σωτήρ applied to GodPaul, God the FatherIsaiah 45:21 (“a righteous God and a Savior”); Romans 1:1 (ਰਸੂਲ, ਖੁਸ਼ਖਬਰੀ)First of six σωτήρ occurrences in Titus (see §5 below); render ਮੁਕਤੀਦਾਤਾ with mandatory ਮੁਕਤੀ gloss
Titus 1:4Shared faith, grace and peace greetingTitusRomans 1:7 (ਕਿਰਪਾ ਅਤੇ ਸ਼ਾਂਤੀ); Galatians 1:3; Ephesians 1:2MUST match baseline Romans 1:7 greeting-formula rendering exactly — this greeting recurs across nearly every Pauline epistle in the pipeline; consistency is a named baseline requirement
Titus 1:5–9Qualifications for elders/overseersTitus, local elders1 Timothy 3:1–7 (direct NT parallel, near-verbatim qualification list); Exodus 18:21 (Jethro’s counsel: choose capable, God-fearing, honest leaders); Leviticus 21:6–8 (priestly holiness qualifications, typological background)Elder-qualification lists in Titus and 1 Timothy must be rendered with parallel Punjabi vocabulary wherever the underlying Greek term is shared (see §6 rendering-consistency table), so a learner studying both epistles recognizes the same standard
Titus 1:6”One-woman man,” household orderElder candidateGenesis 2:24 (one-flesh marriage pattern); 1 Timothy 3:2Idiom must retain marital-faithfulness sense; do not render as a bare marital-status checkbox
Titus 1:9Sound doctrine (διδασκαλία ὑγιαίνουσα)Elder2 Timothy 4:3 (“will not endure sound teaching”); 1 Timothy 1:10; Romans 16:17 (avoid those who cause division contrary to the doctrine you learned)ਖਰੀ ਸਿੱਖਿਆ must be rendered identically wherever διδασκαλία ὑγιαίνουσα recurs in 1–2 Timothy curricula, to preserve the Pastoral-Epistles signature phrase across the pipeline
Titus 1:10–11False teachers, “the circumcision party”Jewish-Christian legalistsGenesis 17:9–14 (origin of circumcision as covenant sign); Acts 15:1–5 (Jerusalem Council controversy); Galatians 2:12; Romans 2:28–29 (true circumcision is of the heart)Requires a historical-background translator note; risk of a Punjabi reader conflating this with contemporary interfaith identity markers if left unexplained
Titus 1:12Quotation of a Cretan poet (“prophet of their own”)Epimenides (pagan Cretan poet, cited by Paul)Acts 17:28 (Paul quoting Greek poets Epimenides/Aratus at the Areopagus); NOT an Old Testament citationHigh sensitivity — unique case. This is Paul citing a pagan source approvingly for a limited rhetorical point, not Scripture. Must NOT be labeled ਭਵਿੱਖਬਾਣੀ (prophecy, baseline term reserved for God-inspired declaration) or ਨਬੀ (baseline term for a true prophet of God) without a clarifying note; render “a prophet of their own” as ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦਾ ਆਪਣਾ ਇੱਕ ਕਵੀ/ਬੋਲਣ ਵਾਲਾ with an explanatory gloss that this is a Cretan poet’s saying, quoted for its accuracy about a cultural trait, not inspired revelation
Titus 1:15Purity is inward, not ritual/dietaryBelievers vs. the “defiled and unbelieving”Mark 7:18–23 (Jesus: nothing entering from outside defiles); Romans 14:14, 14:20 (nothing is unclean in itself); Acts 10:15Direct parallel to the Romans 14 food-conscience discussion already in the baseline pipeline — render with the SAME ਪਵਿੱਤਰ vocabulary pattern used there; high flashpoint given Punjab’s jhatka/kutha and Hindu purity-code traditions; mandatory translator note
Titus 1:16Profess to know God, deny by worksFalse teachers1 John 2:4 (“whoever says ‘I know him’ but does not keep his commandments…”); Matthew 7:21–23Negative “good works” sense — keep visibly distinct from the positive good-works fruit doctrine of 2:14/3:8

2. Cross-Reference Matrix — Titus 2:1–10 (Household Instructions)

Titus PassageThemeRelated Character/GroupOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Titus 2:1Sound doctrine (repeated banner)TitusTitus 1:9; 2 Timothy 1:13Same ਖਰੀ ਸਿੱਖਿਆ rendering as 1:9
Titus 2:2–3Older men/women, ਬਿਰਧ (age category)Congregation members1 Timothy 5:1–2; Leviticus 19:32 (honor the elderly)Keep ਬਿਰਧ (mere age) sharply distinct from ਬਜ਼ੁਰਗ (the ordained office, 1:5)
Titus 2:3–5Older women teaching younger women; household orderWomen in the churchProverbs 31:10–31 (the capable wife); Ephesians 5:22–24; 1 Peter 3:1–6Frame as mutual household discipleship, not a devaluation of women’s broader calling; consistent with baseline’s gender-language caution
Titus 2:5, 2:9ὑποτάσσεσθαι — submission (wives to husbands; slaves to masters)Wives; bondservantsEphesians 5:22–24; Colossians 3:18, 3:22; 1 Peter 2:18, 3:1; Romans 13:1 (same verb family applied to civil authority)Third and fourth household-code occurrences of the SAME Greek verb ὑποτάσσω that governs Titus 3:1’s civil submission — render ਅਧੀਨ ਹੋਣਾ identically across all three domains (state, marriage, household service) so the underlying unity of the doctrine is visible; always teach as voluntary, gospel-motivated, and bounded by prior obedience to God
Titus 2:9–10Slaves and mastersBondservantsPhilemon 1:16 (Onesimus as “brother,” transforming the master-slave relation); Ephesians 6:5–9Requires a historical-context note: addresses conduct within an existing 1st-century social structure under gospel ethics; not a divine endorsement of slavery as an institution
Titus 2:10”Adorn the doctrine,” σωτήρ applied to GodSlaves, all believersMatthew 5:16 (let your good works be seen, glorifying the Father); Philippians 2:15Fourth σωτήρ occurrence — see §5

3. Cross-Reference Matrix — Titus 2:11–3:8 (Core Passage)

Titus PassageThemeRelated Character/GroupOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Titus 2:11Grace appeared, bringing salvation to all peopleGod’s grace personifiedRomans 5:15, 5:20–21 (grace abounding); 1 Timothy 2:3–4 (God our Savior desires all to be saved); John 1:14, 1:17 (grace and truth came through Jesus Christ)ਪਰਗਟ ਹੋਈ must echo the same historic, once-for-all “appearing” register used at 3:4 and contrasted with 2:13’s future glory-appearing; do not soften the universal “all people” scope
Titus 2:12Grace trains for godly livingBelieversHebrews 12:10–11 (God’s discipline/παιδεία trains for holiness); Ephesians 6:4 (fathers bring up children in the “training,” παιδεία, of the Lord)ਸਿਖਲਾਈ ਦੇ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ must not read as external religious duty (ਧਾਰਮਿਕ ਫ਼ਰਜ਼) but as grace’s own internal transforming pedagogy — same principle as Hebrews 12
Titus 2:13Blessed hope; appearing of the glory of “our great God and Savior Jesus Christ”Jesus ChristRomans 9:5 (“Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever”) — the single closest doctrinal parallel in the whole Romans/Titus pipeline for the Deity of Christ; also John 1:1, 20:28; Philippians 3:20; 2 Peter 1:1 (identical “God and Savior” grammatical construction)CRITICAL PARALLEL. Titus 2:13 and Romans 9:5 must be treated as a matched pair in translator notes: both assert Christ’s full deity via a single-referent construction. The Punjabi rendering ਸਾਡੇ ਮਹਾਨ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਅਤੇ ਮੁਕਤੀਦਾਤਾ ਯਿਸੂ ਮਸੀਹ must not read as two beings; cross-check against however Romans 9:5 was ultimately rendered in the baseline curriculum for maximal doctrinal consistency
Titus 2:14Christ gave himself to redeem us and purify “a people for his own possession,” zealous for good worksChrist, the redeemed peopleExodus 19:5 (“you shall be my treasured possession,” LXX λαὸς περιούσιος); Deuteronomy 14:2, 26:18; 1 Peter 2:9 (“a people for his own possession,” direct NT echo of the same Exodus text); Psalm 130:8 (“he will redeem Israel from all its iniquities”)Direct LXX covenant-identity quotation/echo. Must render ਆਪਣੀ ਨਿੱਜੀ ਪਰਜਾ so as to visibly connect (in a translator note) to Exodus 19:5 and 1 Peter 2:9 — the Church inherits Israel’s covenant-identity language; must read as a chosen relational identity in Christ, not an ethnic/qaum designation
Titus 2:15Teach, exhort, reprove with all authorityTitus2 Timothy 4:2 (near-identical charge: preach, reprove, rebuke, exhort)Match ਉਤਸ਼ਾਹਿਤ ਕਰਨਾ (baseline) rendering with the same charge in any 2 Timothy curriculum for consistency
Titus 3:1Submission to rulers and authoritiesBelievers, civil governmentRomans 13:1–7 (extended direct parallel — same doctrine, same verb ὑποτάσσω, same “be ready for every good work” echo); 1 Peter 2:13–17; Proverbs 24:21MAJOR CROSS-CURRICULUM LINK. Titus 3:1 is a compressed restatement of Romans 13:1–7. The Punjabi rendering of ਹਾਕਮ ਅਤੇ ਅਧਿਕਾਰੀ and ਅਧੀਨ ਹੋਣਾ MUST match however these were rendered in the Romans 13 curriculum exactly, so a learner moving between the two books encounters identical vocabulary for identical doctrine
Titus 3:2Gentleness, avoiding slander and quarrelingBelievers toward all peopleJames 3:17–18 (wisdom from above is gentle, peaceable); Colossians 3:12–13Low risk; standard virtue vocabulary
Titus 3:3”We ourselves were once…” — pre-conversion bondage to sinPaul, Titus, all believersRomans 1:21–32 (parallel vice-catalogue of fallen humanity); Romans 6:17, 6:20 (“you were slaves of sin”); Ephesians 2:1–3; Colossians 3:7Direct structural parallel to Romans’ own “before grace” catalogues; must preserve the totality of the “before” state — no partial or self-improved starting point — so that 3:4’s grace reads as sheer unmerited rescue, matching Romans’ own rhetorical strategy
Titus 3:4God’s kindness and love for mankind appeared; σωτήρ applied to GodGod the FatherRomans 2:4 (“God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance”); Ephesians 2:4–5 (“because of the great love with which he loved us…by grace you have been saved”)Fifth σωτήρ occurrence — see §5. ਦਿਆਲਤਾ/ਪਿਆਰ pairing should echo Ephesians 2:4-5’s grace-love pairing in translator cross-notes
Titus 3:5Not by works of righteousness but by mercy; washed, regenerated, renewed by the Holy SpiritGod, believersRomans 3:20, 3:28, 4:4–5 (works excluded as the ground of justification — the single closest doctrinal parallel to this verse in the pipeline); Ephesians 2:8–9 (“not a result of works, so that no one may boast”); Ezekiel 36:25–27 (God’s promise: “I will sprinkle clean water on you… I will give you a new heart… I will put my Spirit within you” — the OT prophetic background for washing/renewal by the Spirit); John 3:5 (“born of water and the Spirit”)CRITICAL, highest-priority cross-reference in this document. The negation οὐκ ἐξ ἔργων must be rendered with the identical absolute force used in the Romans 3–4 grace-versus-works passages: ਕੰਮਾਂ ਦੇ ਕਾਰਨ ਨਹੀਂ. The washing/regeneration language must be tied by translator note to Ezekiel 36:25–27 and John 3:5 as its OT/Gospel background, reinforcing that ਨਵ-ਜਨਮ is Spirit-wrought new creation, not ritual bathing (see baseline ਇਸ਼ਨਾਨ prohibition) and not a stage within ਆਵਾਗਵਣ
Titus 3:6The Spirit poured out richly through Jesus Christ our SaviorHoly Spirit, ChristJoel 2:28–29 (“I will pour out my Spirit”); Acts 2:17–18, 2:33 (Pentecost fulfillment of Joel); σωτήρ, sixth and final occurrenceDirect OT-quotation chain: Joel 2:28 → Acts 2:17 → Titus 3:6 echoes the same “pour out” (ἐκχέω) verb; render ਵਹਾ ਦਿੱਤਾ consistently with however Acts 2 renders Joel’s fulfillment, if/when that curriculum is developed
Titus 3:7Justified by grace, made heirs, hope of eternal lifeBelieversRomans 8:17 (“heirs with Christ”); Galatians 3:29, 4:7; Romans 4:13 (Abraham as heir of the world through faith’s righteousness)ਵਾਰਸ must connect by translator note to the baseline’s ਦੱਤਕ ਪੁੱਤਰਤਾ (adoption) doctrine and to Romans 8:17’s heirship language — justification and adoption converge in this single verse
Titus 3:8”The saying is trustworthy”; devotion to good works as necessary fruitBelievers1 Timothy 1:15, 3:1, 4:9; 2 Timothy 2:11 (the recurring Pastoral formula)Formula ਇਹ ਬਚਨ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸਯੋਗ ਹੈ must be rendered identically wherever Πιστὸς ὁ λόγος recurs across the Pastoral Epistles pipeline

4. Cross-Reference Matrix — Titus 3:9–15 (Closing Instructions)

Titus PassageThemeRelated Character/GroupOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Titus 3:9Avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, quarrels about the lawTitus, congregation1 Timothy 1:4, 6:4; 2 Timothy 2:23 (near-identical charges in the Pastorals)Match ਮੂਰਖਤਾ ਭਰੀਆਂ ਬਹਿਸਾਂ / ਕੁਲਪੱਤਰੀਆਂ rendering across any 1–2 Timothy curriculum
Titus 3:10–11Warn and then reject a divisive personLocal congregationMatthew 18:15–17 (graduated correction process); Romans 16:17 (watch out for those who cause divisions)ਫੁੱਟ ਪਾਉਣ ਵਾਲਾ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ must be read as describing persistent division after warning, consistent with the Matthew 18 process, not a single honest disagreement
Titus 3:12–13Personal greetings and travel plans (Artemas, Tychicus, Zenas, Apollos)Paul’s ministry teamActs 18:24 (Apollos); Ephesians 6:21, 2 Timothy 4:12 (Tychicus)No doctrinal risk; transliterate proper names per established Punjabi Bible conventions
Titus 3:14”Let our people learn to devote themselves to good works… so as not to be unfruitful”BelieversJohn 15:1–8 (fruitfulness/unfruitfulness imagery); Matthew 7:19; Galatians 5:22ਬੇਫਲ (unfruitful) closes the letter’s good-works theme; keep ਭਲੇ ਕੰਮ vocabulary consistent with 1:16, 2:7, 2:14, 3:1, 3:8
Titus 3:15Closing grace benedictionAll believersRomans 16:20, 16:24 (near-identical Pauline closing formula); Galatians 6:18; Colossians 4:18ਕਿਰਪਾ ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਸਾਰਿਆਂ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਹੋਵੇ must match the baseline’s benediction rendering pattern for consistency across all Pauline-epistle curricula in this pipeline

5. Messianic and Deity-of-Christ References Summary

Titus contains no direct Old Testament “seed of David” or explicit fulfilled-prophecy quotation of the kind found in Romans 1:2-4 or 15:8-12. Its messianic weight is carried instead through the σωτήρ (Savior) title-chain and the 2:13 deity assertion:

OccurrenceReferentNote
Titus 1:3God the Father”God our Savior”
Titus 1:4Jesus Christ”Christ Jesus our Savior”
Titus 2:10God the Father”the doctrine of God our Savior”
Titus 2:13Jesus Christour great God and Savior, Jesus Christ” — single-referent construction; Critical
Titus 3:4God the Father”God our Savior”
Titus 3:6Jesus Christ”Jesus Christ our Savior”

Translation-consistency rule: Because Titus deliberately alternates σωτήρ between Father and Son six times in three chapters, every occurrence must carry an identical Punjabi rendering (ਮੁਕਤੀਦਾਤਾ) with the identical mandatory ਮੁਕਤੀ gloss, so that the reader recognizes across all six instances that Father and Son are jointly and without division called Savior — this alternation is itself the letter’s implicit argument for the Deity of Christ, matching Romans 9:5’s explicit assertion. Any inconsistency in rendering across the six occurrences would obscure this argument.

6. Typology Summary

Old Testament TypeNew Testament Fulfillment in TitusNote
Israel as God’s treasured possession, a holy nation (Exodus 19:5–6)The Church as “a people for his own possession, zealous for good works” (Titus 2:14)Church inherits and fulfills Israel’s covenant-identity vocabulary; render ਆਪਣੀ ਨਿੱਜੀ ਪਰਜਾ with cross-note to Exodus 19:5
Levitical priestly holiness qualifications (Leviticus 21:6–8; Exodus 28)Elder/overseer character qualifications (Titus 1:6–9)Not a literal priesthood parallel but a structural echo: God’s appointed leaders must meet a distinct holiness standard
Circumcision of the flesh as covenant sign (Genesis 17:9–14)“Circumcision party” controversy rejected; true inward change taught instead (Titus 1:10–11; cf. Romans 2:28–29)Old covenant sign superseded by inward regeneration (Titus 3:5)
Ceremonial washings (Leviticus 14–15; Numbers 19)“Washing of regeneration” by the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5)External ritual cleansing typologically fulfilled by internal Spirit-wrought new birth; reinforces the ਧੋਣਾ-not-ਇਸ਼ਨਾਨ rendering choice
Promised outpouring of the Spirit (Joel 2:28–29; Ezekiel 36:25–27)The Spirit “poured out richly” through Christ (Titus 3:6)Direct prophetic fulfillment chain (Joel → Acts 2 → Titus 3:6)

7. Parallels to the Romans Curriculum — Rendering-Consistency Rules

Because Romans and Titus will circulate within the same Punjabi learner pipeline, the following shared quotations, formulas, and doctrines REQUIRE identical Punjabi rendering across both curricula:

Shared ElementRomans LocationTitus LocationConsistency Rule
Grace-and-peace greeting formulaRomans 1:7Titus 1:4ਕਿਰਪਾ ਅਤੇ ਸ਼ਾਂਤੀ rendered identically
Grace excludes works as the ground of salvationRomans 3:20, 3:28, 4:4–5, 11:5–6Titus 3:5ਕੰਮਾਂ ਦੇ ਕਾਰਨ ਨਹੀਂ (or equivalent absolute negation) used identically; both passages are flagged Critical under the baseline’s grace-vs-works escalation rule
Single-referent “God and Savior” deity assertionRomans 9:5Titus 2:13Treat as a matched theological pair; ensure neither rendering allows a two-beings misreading
Submission to civil authorityRomans 13:1–7Titus 3:1ਹਾਕਮ ਅਤੇ ਅਧਿਕਾਰੀ / ਅਧੀਨ ਹੋਣਾ rendered identically; same voluntary, gospel-bounded framing
Pre-conversion vice catalogue (“we/you once were…”)Romans 1:21–32; 6:17, 6:20Titus 3:3Maintain full totality of the “before” state in both; do not soften either
Heirship following justificationRomans 8:17Titus 3:7ਵਾਰਸ rendered identically; both connect to baseline ਦੱਤਕ ਪੁੱਤਰਤਾ
Closing grace benedictionRomans 16:20, 16:24Titus 3:15ਕਿਰਪਾ ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਸਾਰਿਆਂ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਹੋਵੇ (or minimal variant) used identically
Watch for/avoid divisive personsRomans 16:17Titus 3:10–11Consistent vocabulary for “divisive,” though Titus’s αἱρετικὸς ἄνθρωπος is a distinct term from Romans’ more general warning — flag the terminological difference in a translator note rather than force identical wording
Food/ritual purity is not the issue; inward condition isRomans 14:14, 14:20Titus 1:15ਪਵਿੱਤਰ vocabulary pattern used identically; both require the same mandatory translator note regarding Punjab’s dietary/ritual-purity traditions

This document extends 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md. All new terms introduced by cross-references (e.g. references to Exodus, Ezekiel, Joel, Acts) that are not yet in translation_memory.json should be evaluated for registry inclusion only if they recur as load-bearing terms within the Titus curriculum itself; incidental cross-reference vocabulary from other books does not require new registry entries unless quoted directly in a Titus passage.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words