Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis — 1 John (Koine Greek → Ukrainian)

Scope and Method

This document analyzes 1 John in its original Koine Greek across all five chapters, with the core passage (4:7-21) treated verse-by-verse. Every load-bearing theological term is given: original word, transliteration, literal meaning, semantic range, English variants, contextual theological meaning, and destination-language (Ukrainian) rendering risk.

Where a term already appears in the baseline Romans/Galatians translation_memory.json or bible_term_registry.json, the recorded Ukrainian rendering is reused exactly and marked “(baseline reuse).” New terms proposed here follow the baseline’s established conventions (Ohienko-anchored Scripture register; explicit doctrinal framing rather than assumed common ground across Ukraine’s three living traditions — Orthodox Church of Ukraine, the historically Moscow-linked Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church — plus the Protestant/Evangelical minority that is this curriculum’s primary theological frame).

1 John’s own risk profile compounds the baseline’s: this letter is saturated with sacramentally resonant vocabulary (confession, anointing, water and blood, being “born of God”) that maps with unusual precision onto specific sacraments (Ісповідь/Confession, Миропомазання/Chrismation, Хрещення/Baptism) administered by Ukraine’s two majority traditions — a much denser concentration of this risk pattern than Romans or Galatians presented individually.

PART A — CORE PASSAGE: 1 John 4:7-21 (Verse-by-Verse)

4:7 — Ἀγαπητοί, ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους, ὅτι ἡ ἀγάπη ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ ἐστιν, καὶ πᾶς ὁ ἀγαπῶν ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ γεγέννηται καὶ γινώσκει τὸν θεόν.

(“Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God, and everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God.”)

ἀγαπητοί (agapētoi) — lit. “beloved ones.” Semantic range: term of pastoral endearment, address to the whole congregation. English variants: “beloved,” “dear friends.” Theological meaning: frames the command in relationship, not obligation. Ukrainian: любі / улюблені. Risk: Low. Standard vocative form; no collision risk.
ἀγάπη / ἀγαπάω (agapē / agapaō) — lit. “love” (noun/verb). Semantic range in Koine: committed, willed, self-giving good toward another, distinct from ἔρως (romantic/erotic desire) and φιλία (friendship affection), though NT usage is not always rigidly separated. English variants: “love,” “charity” (older). Contextual theological meaning: the term names both God’s own nature (v.8) and the command believers are given; here it is the ground and evidence of the new birth. Ukrainian: любов (baseline reuse from Galatians TM, love, High risk). Risk: Critical in 1 John specifically — elevated beyond the Galatians baseline’s High rating because 4:7-21 makes love an ontological predicate of God (“God is love,” v.8, 16), not only an ethical fruit (as in Galatians 5:22). Ukrainian любов is lexically unambiguous but semantically crowded (romantic, familial, patriotic, neighborly love share the one word); risk that the identity claim “Бог є любов” is heard as a warm generality (“God is loving,” a mood) rather than a definitional statement about God’s very nature, requiring explicit theological unpacking rather than assumption that любов alone carries it.
γεγέννηται (gegennētai) — perfect passive of γεννάω, “has been born / has been begotten.” Semantic range: birth, begetting, origin. English variants: “is born of,” “has been begotten by.” Contextual theological meaning: new birth is evidenced by ongoing love for others — this is the doctrine “Love for the Brethren as Evidence of New Birth.” Ukrainian: народжений (від Бога). Risk: Critical. Directly collides with the two majority traditions’ strong identification of new birth/regeneration with the moment of sacramental Baptism (Хрещення). 1 John’s argument is diagnostic (love is the evidence one has been born of God, whenever/however that new birth occurred) rather than a claim about the mechanism of new birth; this distinction must be taught explicitly, exactly as the baseline requires for the Romans/Galatians тіло, благодать, and виправдання terms — not assumed shared ground.
γινώσκει (ginōskei) — present active of γινώσκω, “knows / is knowing.” Semantic range: relational, experiential, ongoing knowledge (distinct from οἶδα, settled/reflective knowledge — see v.16, v.13 notes below). English variants: “knows.” Contextual theological meaning: knowing God in 1 John is relational communion, not mere intellectual assent. Ukrainian: знає. Risk: Medium. Ukrainian знати does not formally distinguish γινώσκω from οἶδα; the ongoing-relational nuance of γινώσκω here must be carried by context/exposition, not the verb form alone.

4:8 — ὁ μὴ ἀγαπῶν οὐκ ἔγνω τὸν θεόν, ὅτι ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν.

(“The one who does not love has not known God, for God is love.”)

ἔγνω (egnō) — aorist of γινώσκω, “knew / came to know.” Semantic range: here a summary-punctiliar aorist, “has not known [at all].” English variants: “does not know,” “has never known.” Contextual theological meaning: absence of love is presented as total absence of relational knowledge of God, not a partial deficiency. Ukrainian: не пізнав. Risk: Medium. Must not soften the aorist’s totalizing force into a partial “doesn’t know God very well.”
ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν (ho theos agapē estin) — “God is love.” No article before ἀγάπη (predicate nominative without article), a grammatical point classical commentators use to argue this is not “Love is God” (i.e., not a claim that the abstraction love is divine) but a claim about God’s nature. Contextual theological meaning: God’s essential nature, not merely an activity of God. Ukrainian: Бог є любов. Risk: Critical. This is the doctrinal anchor of the whole passage and one of only two “God is ___” ontological predications in the letter (with “God is light,” 1:5). Must be rendered and taught so that любов names God’s nature (ground for all other love), not the reverse — Ukrainian syntax risks the same ambiguity English carries; exposition must state explicitly that this is not “love is divine” (a philosophical/New-Age-adjacent inversion risk paralleling the baseline’s warning against аватар and елементal-spirits confusions) but “God, in his very being, is love.” Mandatory theologian review.

4:9 — ἐν τούτῳ ἐφανερώθη ἡ ἀγάπη τοῦ θεοῦ ἐν ἡμῖν, ὅτι τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ τὸν μονογενῆ ἀπέσταλκεν ὁ θεὸς εἰς τὸν κόσμον ἵνα ζήσωμεν διʼ αὐτοῦ.

(“In this the love of God was manifested among us, that God sent his only Son into the world, so that we might live through him.”)

ἐφανερώθη (ephanerōthē) — aorist passive of φανερόω, “was manifested / was made visible/known.” Semantic range: to reveal, disclose, bring into visibility what was previously hidden. English variants: “was manifested,” “was revealed,” “was shown.” Contextual theological meaning: love is not an abstract attribute but a historically enacted, visible event — the sending of the Son. This verb recurs at 1:2, 3:5, 3:8 tying incarnation, atonement, and love together across the letter. Ukrainian: з’явилася / була виявлена. Risk: Medium-High. Must be distinguished from a merely internal or mystical “revelation”; the emphasis is historical, public, and christologically concrete — an emphasis the shared icon theology of the Orthodox and Greek Catholic traditions can actually support well (a genuine asset, paralleling the baseline’s note on incarnation and icon theology).
τὸν μονογενῆ (ton monogenē) — “the only (one of a kind) / only begotten.” Semantic range: unique, one-of-a-kind, without peer — not “firstborn among many” (πρωτότοκος), a different word/concept. English variants: “only,” “only-begotten,” “one and only.” Contextual theological meaning: Christ’s Sonship is unrepeatable and unique — reinforces son_of_god (baseline Critical term). Ukrainian: Єдинородний. Risk: Medium. Established, uncontested Nicene-Creed term shared across all three living Ukrainian traditions (prayed in the Divine Liturgy: “Єдинородного Сина Божого”); an asset, not a liability, but must retain “unique” rather than drifting toward a vague “special/beloved” reading.
κόσμον (kosmon) — accusative of κόσμος, “world.” Semantic range: (a) the created physical order; (b) humanity generally; (c) the system of human life organized in opposition to God (a distinctly Johannine negative sense, dominant in 2:15-17, 4:1-5, 5:19). English variants: “world,” “the world.” Contextual theological meaning: here (positive/neutral sense) the object of God’s saving love — contrasted sharply with the negative sense used elsewhere in the letter. Ukrainian: світ. Risk: High. See dedicated entry under Chapter 2/4 below (doctrine: Overcoming the World). Must be disambiguated on first occurrence between κόσμος’s positive sense (God’s love reaches “the world,” 4:9, John 3:16 parallel) and its negative systemic sense (2:15, “do not love the world”) — collapsing the two would either make God’s love partial or make “not loving the world” a call to hate creation/people.
ἀπέσταλκεν (apestalken) — perfect of ἀποστέλλω, “has sent.” Semantic range: sending with commission and purpose, related to ἀπόστολος (apostle, baseline Medium term). English variants: “sent,” “has sent.” Contextual theological meaning: the perfect tense marks a completed act with ongoing effect — the sending remains effective. Ukrainian: послав. Risk: Low-Medium. Distinguish this christological “sending” (Father sends Son) from the missiological “sending” of believers to the nations (baseline mission entry) — same root idea, different referent; do not conflate in exposition.

4:10 — ἐν τούτῳ ἐστὶν ἡ ἀγάπη, οὐχ ὅτι ἡμεῖς ἠγαπήσαμεν τὸν θεόν, ἀλλʼ ὅτι αὐτὸς ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς καὶ ἀπέστειλεν τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ ἱλασμὸν περὶ τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν ἡμῶν.

(“In this is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.”)

ἱλασμόν (hilasmon) — accusative of ἱλασμός, “propitiation / atoning sacrifice.” Semantic range: a sacrifice that deals with (turns away, satisfies, atones for) sin’s guilt and God’s righteous judgment against it; related to ἱλαστήριον (Romans 3:25’s “mercy seat/propitiation,” already flagged in the baseline as a mandatory theologian-review term). English variants: “propitiation,” “atoning sacrifice,” “expiation.” Contextual theological meaning: Christ’s death is not merely exemplary love but a judicial, sin-bearing sacrifice that satisfies what sin required. Ukrainian: жертва примирення (proposed; transliteration hilasmos). Risk: Critical. Directly extends the baseline’s Romans 3:25 atonement/propitiation escalation rule into 1 John (recurs again at 2:2). Must not be flattened into a generic “sacrifice of love” (losing the judicial, wrath-related dimension) nor allowed to import an unrelated ransom-to-the-devil or purely therapeutic (healing-only) atonement model without explicit comparison; mandatory theologian review for every occurrence (2:2; 4:10).
ἁμαρτιῶν (hamartiōn) — genitive plural of ἁμαρτία, “sins.” Ukrainian: гріхів (baseline reuse, sin = гріх, High risk). Risk: High (inherited).

4:11 — Ἀγαπητοί, εἰ οὕτως ὁ θεὸς ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς, καὶ ἡμεῖς ὀφείλομεν ἀλλήλους ἀγαπᾶν.

(“Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another.”)

ὀφείλομεν (opheilomen) — present of ὀφείλω, “we owe / we are obligated.” Semantic range: debt-language, moral obligation flowing from a prior gift received (not an independent duty). English variants: “ought,” “are bound to,” “owe it.” Contextual theological meaning: love for the brethren is a debt of gratitude for grace received, not a meritorious work that earns standing — this must be held together with the baseline’s grace/works-contrast discipline (Romans 4:4-5, 11:5-6; Galatians 2:16). Ukrainian: повинні / зобов’язані. Risk: Medium. Risk that “obligation” language reads as legalistic duty (a works_of_the_law-adjacent misreading) rather than gratitude-shaped response to grace (баseline Critical term); exposition should make the causal order explicit (God loved first → we are freed and moved to love, not: we love in order to be loved).

4:12 — θεὸν οὐδεὶς πώποτε τεθέαται· ἐὰν ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους, ὁ θεὸς ἐν ἡμῖν μένει καὶ ἡ ἀγάπη αὐτοῦ ἐν ἡμῖν τετελειωμένη ἐστίν.

(“No one has ever seen God; if we love one another, God abides in us and his love is perfected in us.”)

τεθέαται (tetheatai) — perfect of θεάομαι, “has seen / has beheld” (contemplative seeing). Semantic range: to gaze upon, perceive directly. English variants: “seen,” “beheld.” Contextual theological meaning: God’s invisibility means love for the brethren becomes the visible proof and locus of God’s presence — an important corrective against any claim to have “seen”/experienced God apart from concrete love for others. Ukrainian: бачив. Risk: Low-Medium. Note the tension this creates with icon theology’s claim that the incarnate Christ has been “seen” (shared Orthodox/Greek Catholic doctrinal ground, per baseline’s incarnation notes) — 1 John is speaking of the Father’s essential invisibility, not denying the Son’s visible incarnation; this distinction should be stated explicitly to avoid an apparent contradiction with incarnation doctrine.
μένει (menei) — present of μένω, “abides / remains / dwells.” Semantic range: a settled, continuing, relational dwelling — not a temporary visit. English variants: “abides,” “remains,” “dwells,” “lives in.” Contextual theological meaning: the letter’s key relational-continuance verb (used ~24 times across the book: 2:6, 10, 14, 17, 24, 27, 28; 3:6, 9, 14, 15, 17, 24; 4:12, 13, 15, 16). Ukrainian: перебуває. Risk: High. Must retain the sense of settled, ongoing relational indwelling — not merely “stay” or “remain [in a place]” (a locative reading loses the relational/covenantal force) nor collapse into a claim of automatic sacramental indwelling detached from the ethical tests (love, right confession, obedience) 1 John repeatedly ties to it. This verb is load-bearing across the whole letter and must be rendered identically at every occurrence per the baseline’s cross-document consistency rule.
τετελειωμένη (teteleiōmenē) — perfect passive participle of τελειόω, “has been perfected/completed/brought to its goal.” Semantic range: completion, maturity, reaching intended purpose — not sinless moral flawlessness. English variants: “perfected,” “made complete,” “brought to full expression.” Contextual theological meaning: love reaches its intended goal/completeness through being enacted toward others, not through private feeling alone. Ukrainian: досконала / удосконалена. Risk: Medium. Ukrainian досконалий carries a strong connotation of flawless perfection; must be explicitly glossed as “complete/mature/having reached its goal,” not “emotionally flawless,” to avoid setting an impossible moralistic bar readers will feel they cannot meet — a pastoral risk given this doctrine’s proximity to sanctification (baseline Critical term, already flagged against theosis/обоження conflation).

4:13 — ἐν τούτῳ γινώσκομεν ὅτι ἐν αὐτῷ μένομεν καὶ αὐτὸς ἐν ἡμῖν, ὅτι ἐκ τοῦ πνεύματος αὐτοῦ δέδωκεν ἡμῖν.

(“By this we know that we abide in him and he in us, because he has given us of his Spirit.”)

γινώσκομεν (ginōskomen) — see v.7-8 note; here explicitly the basis of assurance (doctrine: Assurance of Salvation and Eternal Life). Ukrainian: знаємо. Risk: Medium (structural γινώσκω/οἶδα issue as above).
ἐκ τοῦ πνεύματος αὐτοῦ (ek tou pneumatos autou) — “of his Spirit.” Ukrainian: від Духа Його / Святого Духа Його (baseline reuse, holy_spirit = Святий Дух, Medium-Critical). Risk: Critical per baseline rule — even though the Greek here has the possessive αὐτοῦ (“his Spirit”) rather than the bare unqualified πνεῦμα the baseline specifically flags as dangerous (cf. Galatians 5:16-25’s bare-pneuma warning), Ukrainian exposition must still render this as capitalized Дух and explicitly gloss it as the Holy Spirit’s personal indwelling, not a “spirit/mood” in the secular wartime sense (“бойовий дух”).

4:14 — καὶ ἡμεῖς τεθεάμεθα καὶ μαρτυροῦμεν ὅτι ὁ πατὴρ ἀπέσταλκεν τὸν υἱὸν σωτῆρα τοῦ κόσμου.

(“And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son as Savior of the world.”)

μαρτυροῦμεν (martyroumen) — present of μαρτυρέω, “we testify/bear witness.” Semantic range: eyewitness legal/formal testimony, not casual opinion. English variants: “testify,” “bear witness,” “attest.” Contextual theological meaning: apostolic eyewitness testimony grounds the church’s proclamation (cf. 1:1-3). Ukrainian: свідчимо. Risk: Medium. Ukrainian свідчити is lexically clear and distinct from мучеництво (martyrdom), so the classical Greek etymological overlap (μάρτυς → both “witness” and, later, “martyr”) poses no confusion risk in Ukrainian as it might elsewhere; a minor asset.
σωτῆρα τοῦ κόσμου (sōtēra tou kosmou) — “Savior of the world.” Ukrainian: Спаситель світу. Risk: High. Extends baseline salvation (Critical) into a title; must not be read through any one tradition’s fuller soteriological system (theosis for Orthodox/Greek Catholic readers) without the explicit forensic/relational anchoring the baseline requires (Romans 10:9-10 pattern) — here κόσμος again carries the positive, universal-scope sense (cf. universal_scope_of_gospel, baseline High-risk doctrine).

4:15 — ὃς ἐὰν ὁμολογήσῃ ὅτι Ἰησοῦς ἐστιν ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ, ὁ θεὸς ἐν αὐτῷ μένει καὶ αὐτὸς ἐν τῷ θεῷ.

(“Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God.”)

ὁμολογήσῃ (homologēsē) — aorist subjunctive of ὁμολογέω, “should confess/acknowledge.” Semantic range: to say the same thing as (ὁμο- + λόγος), i.e., publicly agree with/affirm a stated truth; used both of confessing sin (1:9) and confessing Christ’s identity (here; 2:23; 4:2-3, 15). English variants: “confess,” “acknowledge,” “profess,” “declare.” Contextual theological meaning: here, the christological confession that secures the mutual-abiding relationship — parallel in force to Romans 10:9’s “Jesus is Lord” confession (baseline mandatory-theologian-review passage). Ukrainian: визнає. Risk: Critical. See extended treatment under Chapter 1 (1:9) below — визнавати must be kept distinct from сповідатися (the specific verb for the sacramental rite of Ісповідь/Confession before a priest in the Orthodox and Greek Catholic traditions). Here in 4:15/2:23, the confession is public christological affirmation, close in force to Romans 10:9; render consistently with that verse per the baseline’s cross-document consistency rule (same rendering of Romans 10:9-10) wherever the semantic act (public confession of Jesus’ identity) is the same.

4:16 — καὶ ἡμεῖς ἐγνώκαμεν καὶ πεπιστεύκαμεν τὴν ἀγάπην ἣν ἔχει ὁ θεὸς ἐν ἡμῖν. ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν, καὶ ὁ μένων ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ ἐν τῷ θεῷ μένει καὶ ὁ θεὸς ἐν αὐτῷ μένει.

(“And we have known and believed the love that God has for us. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.”)

ἐγνώκαμεν … πεπιστεύκαμεν (egnōkamen … pepisteukamen) — perfects of γινώσκω and πιστεύω, “we have come to know … we have believed,” both with present ongoing force. Pairs relational knowledge with faith (baseline High-risk term, віра). Ukrainian: пізнали … повірили. Risk: Medium-High. Note the baseline’s caution that віра can default to confessional/institutional identity rather than personal trust — here it is explicitly paired with relational knowing of God’s love, reinforcing the personal-trust sense the baseline requires be made explicit.
ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν — repeated verbatim from v.8; per the baseline’s cross-document consistency rule, both occurrences must be rendered identically: Бог є любов. Risk: Critical (as at v.8).

4:17 — ἐν τούτῳ τετελείωται ἡ ἀγάπη μεθʼ ἡμῶν, ἵνα παρρησίαν ἔχωμεν ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῆς κρίσεως, ὅτι καθὼς ἐκεῖνός ἐστιν καὶ ἡμεῖς ἐσμὲν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ τούτῳ.

(“By this love is perfected with us, so that we may have confidence in the day of judgment, because as he is, so are we in this world.”)

παρρησίαν (parrēsian) — accusative of παρρησία, “boldness / confidence / freedom of speech.” Semantic range: originally the right of free public speech in the Greek polis; in NT usage, unashamed confidence before God, especially in prayer (3:21-22; 5:14) and at judgment (here). English variants: “confidence,” “boldness,” “assurance.” Contextual theological meaning: assurance of salvation includes confidence that one will not be condemned at the final judgment (doctrine: Assurance of Salvation and Eternal Life). Ukrainian: впевненість / сміливість. Risk: High. Must not be confused with false presumption or a claim to sinless perfection (see v.18’s τελεία ἀγάπη below); must also be distinguished from Orthodox/Greek Catholic pastoral caution about claiming assurance before final judgment (a distinction the baseline already flags under assurance_of_salvation, mandatory theologian review) — 1 John grounds this confidence in Christ’s finished atoning work (2:1-2, 4:10) and the believer’s present love, not in self-confidence about one’s own merit.
κρίσεως (kriseōs) — genitive of κρίσις, “judgment.” Ukrainian: суду. Risk: Medium. Standard eschatological term.

4:18 — φόβος οὐκ ἔστιν ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ, ἀλλʼ ἡ τελεία ἀγάπη ἔξω βάλλει τὸν φόβον, ὅτι ὁ φόβος κόλασιν ἔχει, ὁ δὲ φοβούμενος οὐ τετελείωται ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ.

(“There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.”)

φόβος (phobos) — “fear.” Semantic range: here specifically dread of punishment/judgment (not reverent “fear of the Lord,” a distinct positive OT category not in view in this verse). English variants: “fear,” “dread,” “terror.” Contextual theological meaning: this is anxious dread before a condemning God, which love-secured assurance displaces — not a claim that no healthy reverence for God exists elsewhere in Scripture. Ukrainian: страх. Risk: Medium. Must be distinguished on first occurrence from the positive “fear of the Lord” (страх Господній) tradition prominent in Wisdom literature and in Orthodox/Greek Catholic devotional vocabulary, so readers do not conclude 1 John contradicts that separate, positive category.
τελεία ἀγάπη (teleia agapē) — “perfect/complete love.” See τετελειωμένη note at v.12; same risk of a moralistic-perfectionism misreading. Ukrainian: досконала любов. Risk: Medium (as v.12).
κόλασιν (kolasin) — accusative of κόλασις, “punishment/torment.” English variants: “punishment,” “torment,” “chastisement.” Ukrainian: покарання. Risk: Low-Medium. Standard term; no significant collision risk.

4:19 — ἡμεῖς ἀγαπῶμεν, ὅτι αὐτὸς πρῶτος ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς.

(“We love, because he first loved us.”)

πρῶτος (prōtos) — “first.” Contextual theological meaning: the priority and initiative of divine love as the sole ground of human love in response — the doctrinal hinge of the whole passage’s grace-logic. Ukrainian: перший / першим. Risk: Medium. Must preserve the strict causal-temporal priority (“he loved first,” full stop) rather than softening into a vaguer “God loves too” mutuality that would blur the baseline’s required grace-priority discipline (parallel to Romans 4:4-5, 11:5-6, Galatians 5:6).

4:20 — ἐάν τις εἴπῃ ὅτι ἀγαπῶ τὸν θεόν, καὶ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ μισῇ, ψεύστης ἐστίν· ὁ γὰρ μὴ ἀγαπῶν τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ ὃν ἑώρακεν, τὸν θεὸν ὃν οὐχ ἑώρακεν οὐ δύναται ἀγαπᾶν.

(“If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen.”)

ψεύστης (pseustēs) — “liar.” Semantic range: one who speaks falsehood, used repeatedly in 1 John for false religious claims (1:10; 2:4, 22; 4:20; 5:10). English variants: “liar.” Contextual theological meaning: false claims to love God are not merely mistaken but constitute active deception. Ukrainian: лжець. Risk: Medium. Uses the established лже- productive prefix already present in the baseline (false_brothers = лжебрати; cf. лжепророк, false prophet) — consistent, natural Ukrainian word-formation; no significant new risk, though the bluntness of “liar” (rather than a softer “mistaken”) must be preserved per the baseline’s rule against softening doctrinal statements.
ἀδελφόν (adelphon) — “brother.” Semantic range: fellow believer in the faith-community (not exclusively biological kin, though the word’s base sense is familial). English variants: “brother,” “fellow believer,” “brother/sister” (inclusive gloss). Contextual theological meaning: central to the doctrine “Love for the Brethren as Evidence of New Birth” — the horizontal test of the vertical claim. Ukrainian: брат. Risk: High. Two grounded Ukraine-specific risks: (1) брат in Orthodox/Greek Catholic usage carries a strong monastic-fraternal connotation (брати, monks addressing one another) that could narrow the referent to clergy/religious rather than the whole believing community — exposition should clarify the corporate-inclusive sense, echoing the baseline’s caution for saints. (2) The Cain/Abel fratricide language this term anchors (3:12, 15) risks unintended resonance with wartime Russian-propaganda rhetoric describing Ukrainians and Russians as “brotherly peoples” (братні народи) betrayed by war — 1 John’s own referent (hatred toward a fellow believer negating a claim of new birth) must be kept sharply distinct from that geopolitical framing; translators and reviewers should be alert to this reflex without importing it into the text.
ἑώρακεν (heōraken) — perfect of ὁράω, “has seen.” Ukrainian: бачив. Risk: Low.

4:21 — καὶ ταύτην τὴν ἐντολὴν ἔχομεν ἀπʼ αὐτοῦ, ἵνα ὁ ἀγαπῶν τὸν θεὸν ἀγαπᾷ καὶ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ.

(“And this commandment we have from him, that whoever loves God must love his brother also.”)

ἐντολήν (entolēn) — “commandment.” Semantic range: an authoritative command/instruction, used throughout the letter for both the whole of Christian obligation (3:22-24) and the specific love-command (here; cf. 2:7-8; John 13:34). English variants: “commandment,” “command,” “instruction.” Contextual theological meaning: love for the brethren is not optional sentiment but binding apostolic instruction, yet one flowing from relationship (see baseline’s caution on the Romans law entry: закон is the standard term for both Mosaic Law and civil law; here ἐντολή is a distinct, narrower term for a specific directive rather than the Law as a whole system). Ukrainian: заповідь. Risk: Medium. Per the baseline’s law entry note (“заповідь reserved for individual commandments”), this is the correct established term; risk is that “commandment” language, stacked against works_of_the_law concerns already flagged as Critical in the Galatians baseline, could be misheard as reintroducing law-keeping as a basis of standing with God rather than the fruit of a love-relationship already secured (v.19). Must be explicitly framed per the baseline’s law_of_christ pattern (Galatians 6:2: “the governing ethic of Christlike… love, not a new legal code”).

PART B — CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER STUDY OF THE WHOLE BOOK

Chapter 1 (1:1-10) — Prologue: The Word of Life; Fellowship, Light, and Confession of Sin

Doctrines represented: God is Light; Fellowship with God and One Another; Confession and Forgiveness of Sin.

ὁ λόγος τῆς ζωῆς (ho logos tēs zōēs) — “the Word of life” (1:1). Literal meaning: “the word/message/person of life.” Semantic range: echoes the Gospel of John’s Λόγος Christology (John 1:1, 14) — both the eternal preexistent person and the message/proclamation about him; 1 John deliberately holds both senses together (1:1-3, “what we have seen and heard… concerning the Word of life”). English variants: “Word of life,” “message of life.” Contextual theological meaning: identifies Jesus Christ himself as the eternal, embodied, apostolically witnessed source of life — foundational to the doctrine of the Incarnation. Ukrainian: Слово життя. Risk: High. Must connect explicitly to the pre-existent, eternal Λόγος of John 1:1 (baseline incarnation/son_of_god Critical terms) rather than being heard as an abstract “life-giving message” detached from the person of Christ; the same icon-theology asset noted at 4:9 (ἐφανερώθη) applies here — the letter opens by insisting this Word was seen, heard, and touched (1:1), a strongly incarnational, anti-docetic claim (see Chapter 4 antichrist discussion below).
ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς (ap’ archēs) — “from the beginning” (1:1). Semantic range: here, the eternal preexistence of Christ before creation (echoing John 1:1), distinct from 2:7 and 2:24’s “from the beginning [of your Christian life/of the apostolic teaching]” and 3:8’s “from the beginning [the devil has sinned]” — the same phrase used with three distinct referents across the letter. Ukrainian: від початку. Risk: Medium-High. Requires explicit disambiguation at each occurrence (1:1 = eternity past; 2:7, 24, 3:11 = the start of the readers’ instruction in the faith; 3:8 = the devil’s primordial rebellion) since Ukrainian від початку carries the same three-way ambiguity as the Greek and English.
ἐφανερώθη / φανερόω (ephanerōthē / phaneroō) — “was manifested” (1:2). See extended note at 4:9 above; recurs here of the Word of life itself being made visible. Ukrainian: з’явилося / було виявлене. Risk: Medium-High (as at 4:9).
μαρτυροῦμεν / ἀπαγγέλλομεν (martyroumen / apangellomen) — “we testify… we proclaim/announce” (1:2-3). ἀπαγγέλλω: to report, announce, bring back word. English variants: “declare,” “proclaim,” “report.” Contextual theological meaning: connects to but is distinct from the baseline’s gospel/mission vocabulary (Євангеліє, місія/благовістя) — here it is the apostolic eyewitness report specifically, not the broader missionary-sending concept. Ukrainian: звіщаємо / проповідуємо. Risk: Medium. Should be kept terminologically distinct from благовістя (the baseline’s mission term) unless the exposition intends to draw that connection explicitly.
κοινωνία (koinōnia) — “fellowship” (1:3, 6, 7). Ukrainian: спілкування (baseline reuse, Low risk in Romans). Risk: Elevated to Medium-High in 1 John. 1 John uses κοινωνία as its central relational category — fellowship with the Father and the Son (1:3) and fellowship with one another (1:7) — making it far more theologically load-bearing here than its baseline Romans occurrences (12:13, 15:26, generic sharing/participation). The specific elevated risk: κοινωνία is the same root concept behind the doctrine of Eucharistic Communion (Свята Тайна Причастя/Євхаристія is itself frequently glossed with κοινωνία-derived vocabulary in Greek patristic and Orthodox/Greek Catholic liturgical theology). Exposition must make clear that 1 John’s spilkuvannya names the shared relational life secured by walking in the light and confessing sin (1:5-2:2), which is a broader, not narrower, category than sacramental Communion specifically, without either denying or being collapsed into that sacramental practice.
φῶς (phōs) — “light” (1:5, 7). Literal meaning: light, illumination. Semantic range: moral/spiritual purity, truth, revelation, God’s own nature (contrasted with σκοτία/σκότος, darkness = sin, falsehood, separation from God). English variants: “light.” Contextual theological meaning: “God is light” (1:5) is the letter’s other great ontological predication alongside “God is love” (4:8, 16) — together these frame the entire epistle’s ethical and relational argument (walking in the light = fellowship + confession; God is love = love for the brethren). Ukrainian: світло. Risk: Medium-High. Genuine cultural asset: “Світло Христове” (the Light of Christ) is a well-known Orthodox liturgical phrase (Lenten Vespers), and light/darkness imagery is deeply embedded in Ukrainian Christian devotional language across all three traditions — low risk of foreign-concept confusion. Primary risk is doctrinal, not lexical: must be taught with the same ontological weight as “God is love” (God’s essential purity/truth, not merely an attribute among others) and must not be flattened into a generic “God brings light/hope” sentiment, especially given how readily “light” functions as a hope-metaphor in wartime pastoral language.
σκοτία / σκότος (skotia / skotos) — “darkness” (1:5, 6). Ukrainian: темрява. Risk: Low-Medium. Standard antonym pairing with світло; low collision risk, though should not be allegorized beyond the text’s own moral-relational sense (separation from God through sin) into an unrelated dualistic cosmology.
περιπατέω (peripateō) — “to walk” (1:6, 7), a Johannine idiom for habitual conduct/way of life. English variants: “walk,” “live,” “conduct oneself.” Ukrainian: ходити. Risk: Low. Well-established biblical idiom in Ukrainian (“ходити у світлі” is natural and already familiar from other NT usage); no significant risk.
αἷμα (haima) — “blood” (1:7, “the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin”). Ukrainian: кров. Risk: Medium-High. Connects directly to the Critical-risk propitiation/ἱλασμός doctrine (4:10, 2:2) and to Christ’s atoning death; must not be read through a merely ritual-purification lens (a risk paralleling the baseline’s caution about sanctification/освячення collapsing into the everyday sense of ritual object-blessing) but as the judicial, once-for-all ground of forgiveness.
καθαρίζει / καθαρισμός (katharizei) — “cleanses” (1:7, 9). Semantic range: to make clean, purify — used of both ritual and moral/spiritual cleansing in the LXX and NT. English variants: “cleanses,” “purifies.” Ukrainian: очищає. Risk: Medium. Must be distinguished from ritual purification practices (obriad-cleansing associations already flagged in the baseline’s works_of_the_law and sanctification notes) — this is moral/forensic cleansing grounded in Christ’s blood, received by confession (1:9), not achieved through rite.
ὁμολογέω / ὁμολογία (homologeō) — “confess” (1:9, “if we confess our sins”). Literal meaning: to say the same thing as, to agree with/acknowledge openly. Semantic range: (a) confessing sin to God (1:9; cf. 5:16-17 context); (b) confessing Christ’s identity publicly (2:23; 4:2-3, 15; treated at 4:15 above). English variants: “confess,” “acknowledge,” “admit,” “own up to.” Contextual theological meaning: the doctrinal center of “Confession and Forgiveness of Sin” — an ongoing, honest acknowledgment of sin to God as the condition for experienced cleansing and fellowship, addressed to believers already in right standing (not a repeated re-justification). Ukrainian: визнавати / визнання. Risk: Critical. This is the single most sacramentally sensitive lexical choice in the letter. Ukrainian religious vocabulary has a specific, well-known verb for the sacramental rite of confession before a priest: сповідатися / сповідь (Ісповідь, the Sacrament/Mystery of Repentance, central and frequent in Orthodox and Greek Catholic practice). Using сповідатися for 1 John 1:9 would strongly imply that forgiveness of sins requires this specific sacramental rite mediated by a priest, a claim this curriculum’s Protestant-evangelical frame does not make (1 John presents direct confession to God as sufficient, on the basis of Christ’s atoning blood already stated in 1:7). Recommendation: use визнавати/визнання, never сповідатися/сповідь, for 1 John 1:9’s confession of sin, while separately and respectfully acknowledging in expository material (not in the translated Scripture text itself) that the Orthodox and Greek Catholic traditions have developed a fuller sacramental practice around this same biblical instruction — parallel in method to how the baseline handles justification/grace (state the doctrinal difference plainly rather than silently picking a side by lexical stealth). Mandatory theologian review for every occurrence of ὁμολογέω in the letter (1:9; 2:23; 4:2-3, 15).
ἀφίημι / ἄφεσις (aphiēmi / aphesis) — “forgive / forgiveness” (1:9, “he will forgive us our sins”). English variants: “forgive,” “pardon,” “remit.” Contextual theological meaning: paired with cleansing (καθαρίζω) as God’s twofold gracious response to confession. Ukrainian: простити / прощення. Risk: Medium-High. The baseline explicitly warns that justification (виправдання) “must not quietly resolve into forgiveness of sins alone” — the reverse caution applies equally here: 1 John 1:9’s прощення is a genuine, valid, standing biblical category in its own right (not to be inflated into full justification-language) but must not be confused with, or substituted for, виправдання where the text is making the fuller forensic point elsewhere in the corpus (e.g., Romans 3-5). In 1 John’s own immediate context, прощення гріхів is the correct and sufficient rendering.
ἀδικία (adikia) — “unrighteousness” (1:9, “cleanse us from all unrighteousness”). Ukrainian: неправедність. Risk: Medium. Direct antonym-pairing with the baseline’s righteousness (праведність); ensure неправедність is not heard as merely “unfairness” (a risk paralleling the baseline’s rejection of справедливість for праведність — the false-friend risk runs in both directions on this root).
ψεύστην / ψεῦδος (pseustēn / pseudos) — “liar / a lie” (1:10, “we make him a liar, and his word is not in us”). Ukrainian: лжець / неправда. Risk: Medium (as at 4:20).
πλανῶμεν ἑαυτούς (planōmen heautous) — “we deceive ourselves” (1:8). English variants: “deceive ourselves,” “lead ourselves astray.” Ukrainian: обманюємо себе. Risk: Low-Medium. Straightforward; minor risk of understating the seriousness (self-deception, not merely a mistake) if softened.

Chapter 2 (2:1-29) — Advocate and Propitiation; Walking in Light; The World; Antichrist; The Anointing

Doctrines represented: Confession and Forgiveness of Sin (continued); The Incarnation and Antichrist; Overcoming the World; Assurance of Salvation.

τεκνία (teknia) — “little children” (2:1, 12, 13, 18, 28; 3:2, 7, 18; 4:4; 5:21), a term of affectionate pastoral address, distinct from τέκνα θεοῦ (“children of God,” a theological status term treated under Chapter 3). Ukrainian: діти мої / дітки. Risk: Low. Address form only; no doctrinal content, though should not be confused lexically with the theological “children of God” term below.
παράκλητος (paraklētos) — “Advocate” (2:1, “we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous”). Literal meaning: “one called alongside,” a legal advocate, intercessor, or comforter. Semantic range: in John’s Gospel (14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7) this same word is used of the Holy Spirit (“Advocate/Comforter” sent to be with the disciples after Christ’s departure); here in 1 John 2:1 it is used of the risen Christ himself, interceding with the Father. English variants: “Advocate,” “Comforter,” “Paraclete,” “Intercessor.” Contextual theological meaning: Christ’s ongoing high-priestly intercession on behalf of believers who sin, grounding assurance of forgiveness. Ukrainian: Заступник (proposed). Risk: Critical. This is a uniquely sharp, well-grounded collision: the baseline’s intercession entry explicitly states that “заступництво is the term used almost exclusively in Orthodox and Greek Catholic devotion for the intercession of the saints and the Mother of God (Богородиця)” and must be reserved for that specific devotional context to avoid blurring it with the Spirit’s/Christ’s unique intercessory role. Yet παράκλητος applied to Christ in 2:1 is precisely a claim about Christ’s own unique intercessory office — the very thing заступництво-language is elsewhere fenced off from. Recommend: use Заступник only with an explicit, mandatory expository note that this names Christ’s own unique, singular, high-priestly advocacy before the Father (distinct in kind from the devotional practice of invoking the intercession of departed saints or Mary), rather than фамiliar заступництво devotional language; alternatively, gloss with Посередник (“Mediator/Intercessor”) on first occurrence to further reduce ambiguity. Cross-reference note for future curricula: if a Gospel of John curriculum is later produced, the Spirit’s παράκλητος (traditionally rendered Утішитель, “Comforter,” in the Ohienko text of John 14-16) must be checked for consistency against this term’s use here, since both refer to the same Greek word applied to two different persons of the Trinity in two different Johannine books. Mandatory theologian review for every occurrence.
δίκαιον (dikaion) — “righteous” (2:1, “Jesus Christ the righteous”). Ukrainian: праведний (baseline reuse family, righteousness = праведність). Risk: High (inherited).
ἱλασμός (hilasmos) — “propitiation” (2:2). See extended Critical-risk treatment at 4:10 above; identical term, identical risk, second occurrence in the letter. Ukrainian: жертва примирення. Risk: Critical.
ὅλου τοῦ κόσμου (holou tou kosmou) — “the whole world” (2:2, “not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world”). Contextual theological meaning: the scope-of-atonement question (a genuine point of theological debate even within Protestant traditions, let alone across Ukraine’s three living traditions) — this document flags the term for careful, non-partisan handling rather than resolving it. Ukrainian: цілого світу. Risk: High. Should be presented descriptively (the extent Scripture affirms) without resolving contested questions about the scope/application of the atonement that go beyond this curriculum’s remit; avoid a translation choice that silently forecloses one systematic position.
γινώσκομεν αὐτόν (ginōskomen auton) — “we know him” (2:3), tested by keeping his commandments. Ukrainian: ми знаємо Його. Risk: Medium (as above, γινώσκω pattern).
μένειν ἐν αὐτῷ (menein en autō) — “to abide in him” (2:5-6, 24, 27, 28). See extended note at 4:12 above; recurs as a major structural term across chapter 2. Ukrainian: перебувати в Ньому. Risk: High (as at 4:12); consistency required across all occurrences per baseline cross-document rule.
ἐντολὴν καινήν / παλαιάν (entolēn kainēn / palaian) — “a new commandment… an old commandment” (2:7-8). Ukrainian: нова заповідь / стара заповідь. Risk: Medium. See ἐντολή note at 4:21; here specifically about the love-command’s paradoxical newness-in-continuity with the old command already given “from the beginning” (2:7) — requires exposition to hold both together (not a contradiction).
μισῶν τὸν ἀδελφόν (misōn ton adelphon) — “hating his brother” (2:9, 11). Ukrainian: ненавидить брата. Risk: High (see ἀδελφός note at 4:20 for the брат risk profile).
σκάνδαλον (skandalon) — “stumbling block/cause of stumbling” (2:10). English variants: “occasion for stumbling,” “cause to sin.” Ukrainian: спокуса/причина падіння. Risk: Low-Medium.
τυφλοῖ (typhloi) — “blinds” (2:11, “darkness has blinded his eyes”). Ukrainian: засліпила. Risk: Low.
νενικήκατε τὸν πονηρόν (nenikēkate ton ponēron) — “you have overcome the evil one” (2:13-14). See extended treatment of νικάω under the Chapter 4/5 “Overcoming the World” discussion below; first occurrence in the letter. Ukrainian: перемогли лукавого. Risk: High.
ἀγαπᾶτε τὸν κόσμον (agapate ton kosmon) — “love the world” (2:15, negative command: “do not love the world”). See extended κόσμος treatment below (Chapters 4-5). Ukrainian: любити світ. Risk: High.
ἐπιθυμία τῆς σαρκός / τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν, ἀλαζονεία τοῦ βίου (epithymia tēs sarkos / tōn ophthalmōn, alazoneia tou biou) — “the lust/desire of the flesh, the lust/desire of the eyes, and the pride/arrogance of life” (2:16). Literal meaning: ἐπιθυμία = strong desire/craving (neutral in form, negative here by context); ἀλαζονεία = boastful arrogance, ostentatious self-display; σάρξ = flesh; βίος = (this-worldly) life/livelihood, distinct from ζωή (life in the fuller, especially spiritual, sense — an important distinction, since 1 John elsewhere uses ζωή extensively for eternal life). English variants: “lust of the flesh,” “lust of the eyes,” “pride of life,” “boastful pride in one’s possessions” (modern gloss). Contextual theological meaning: a threefold diagnostic summary of worldly desire opposed to the Father’s will, foundational to “Overcoming the World.” Ukrainian: пожадливість тіла / пожадливість очей / пиха життя. Risk: High. σάρξ/тіло inherits the Galatians baseline’s Critical structural risk (тіло also renders σῶμα, “body,” requiring disambiguation from the traditions’ positive body-theology) — must be flagged on first occurrence here exactly as required for Galatians 5. βίος (this-worldly life/livelihood) must be kept distinct in exposition from ζωή (life, especially eternal life) elsewhere in the letter (2:25; 3:14-15; 5:11-13, 16, 20) — a genuine Greek lexical distinction Ukrainian життя alone does not preserve, requiring explicit exposition.
παράγεται ὁ κόσμος (paragetai ho kosmos) — “the world is passing away” (2:17). Ukrainian: світ проходить. Risk: Medium.
ἐσχάτη ὥρα (eschatē hōra) — “the last hour” (2:18). Literal meaning: the final, climactic period. Semantic range: eschatological urgency-language, not a literal 60-minute countdown; comparable to “the last days” elsewhere in the NT. English variants: “last hour,” “final hour,” “the end times.” Ukrainian: остання година. Risk: Medium. Must be taught as qualitative/eschatological (“the decisive final era inaugurated by Christ’s first coming, marked by the rise of antichrists”) rather than a falsified short-term prediction (nearly 2,000 years have since elapsed) — a risk compounded by heightened apocalyptic anxiety already present in wartime Ukrainian religious discourse, which this term should not be allowed to feed uncritically.
ἀντίχριστος (antichristos) — “antichrist” (2:18, 22; 4:3; cf. 2 John 7). Literal meaning: “against/instead-of Christ.” Semantic range: 1 John is the only NT book to use this exact term, and defines it precisely and narrowly: one who “denies that Jesus is the Christ” (2:22) and denies “that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh” (4:2-3) — i.e., a specific christological/incarnational heresy (proto-Docetism/Gnosticism), plus a class of many such deceivers already active (“many antichrists,” 2:18), not one single end-times individual (that composite/singular figure is a later theological synthesis with Revelation and 2 Thessalonians, not 1 John’s own vocabulary). English variants: “antichrist,” “the antichrist,” “false christ” (imprecise). Contextual theological meaning: central to “The Incarnation and Antichrist” doctrine — the theological test is specifically Christ’s genuine incarnation (“come in the flesh”), not a general moral or political evil. Ukrainian: антихрист. Risk: Critical. Established loanword across all Ukrainian traditions, but the term carries rich East Slavic apocalyptic-folk resonance (historical accusations leveled at various rulers across Russian and Ukrainian religious history) and an acute contemporary temptation, given the current war, to identify “the antichrist” polemically with a living political figure or enemy nation. 1 John’s own definition must be taught and enforced explicitly: the test is a specific denial of the true incarnation and messianic identity of Jesus (2:22; 4:2-3), not a free-floating label for any perceived moral or political evil. Mandatory theologian review for every occurrence; exposition should proactively name and set aside the identify-a-current-figure temptation.
χρῖσμα (chrisma) — “anointing” (2:20, 27, “you have an anointing from the Holy One… his anointing teaches you all things”). Literal meaning: an anointing, the act or substance of being anointed with oil. Semantic range: here a metaphor for the Holy Spirit’s teaching presence given to every believer (contrasted with the false teachers’ claims to superior/esoteric knowledge), not a specific liturgical rite in 1 John’s own usage. English variants: “anointing,” “unction” (archaic). Contextual theological meaning: every believer, not an elite class of teachers, has Spirit-given discernment of truth — closely tied to “Testing the Spirits.” Ukrainian: помазання. Risk: Critical. Sharp, well-grounded collision: Миропомазання (Chrismation/Confirmation) is a major sacrament in both the Orthodox and Greek Catholic traditions, administered once by a priest with holy oil (миро) shortly after baptism, understood to seal the gift of the Holy Spirit. 1 John’s χρῖσμα, by contrast, describes an already-possessed, ongoing teaching reality common to all genuine believers as such, used polemically against a rival claim to special spiritual knowledge — not primarily a description of, or reference to, the liturgical rite. Exposition must explicitly distinguish 1 John’s meaning (the Spirit’s indwelling teaching ministry, given to every believer) from the specific sacramental rite of Миропомазання, without denying that Ukraine’s majority traditions have historically read this verse partly in connection with that sacrament — state the difference plainly, per the baseline’s standard method for sanctification and grace.
παρρησίαν … παρουσία (parrēsian … parousia) — “confidence … his coming” (2:28). παρουσία: technical term for Christ’s return/second coming. Ukrainian: впевненість … прихід Його (парусія, транслітерація допустима в поясненнях). Risk: Medium.
γεγέννηται ἐξ αὐτοῦ … δικαιοσύνην ποιῶν (gegennētai ex autou … dikaiosynēn poiōn) — “has been born of him… doing righteousness” (2:29). First occurrence of the “born of God” formula in the letter, immediately paired with practicing righteousness. Ukrainian: народжений від Нього … хто чинить праведність. Risk: Critical (see extended treatment at Chapter 3 and 4:7 above).

Chapter 3 (3:1-24) — Children of God; Sin as Lawlessness; Love unto Death; Confidence in Prayer

Doctrines represented: Love for the Brethren as Evidence of New Birth; Assurance of Salvation and Eternal Life.

τέκνα θεοῦ (tekna theou) — “children of God” (3:1, 2, 10). Literal meaning: “children,” emphasizing organic birth-relationship (τέκνον, from τίκτω, “to bear/beget”) rather than the specifically legal-status emphasis of υἱοθεσία (adoption, baseline High-risk term, усиновлення). English variants: “children of God,” “God’s children.” Contextual theological meaning: complements rather than replaces the baseline’s adoption doctrine — 1 John emphasizes the organic, birth-based, family-resemblance aspect of belonging to God (hence its constant pairing with the “born of God” formula), while Romans 8’s usynovlennya emphasizes the legal, inheritance-securing aspect; both are true, and this curriculum should present them as complementary facets of the one doctrine of belonging to God’s family, not competing categories. Ukrainian: діти Божі. Risk: High. Inherits the baseline’s flagged wartime sensitivity around усиновлення (the large number of Ukrainian children orphaned or displaced by the war) with equal or greater pastoral force, since “children of God… called God’s children… and so we are” (3:1) speaks with warm, direct, family-belonging language that will land with particular weight for a wartime readership. Must stress secure, permanent, loving family belonging (echoing the baseline’s adoption note) alongside the distinct organic-birth emphasis proper to τέκνα.
κόσμος οὐ γινώσκει ἡμᾶς (kosmos ou ginōskei hēmas) — “the world does not know us” (3:1). Ukrainian: світ не знає нас. Risk: Medium (see κόσμος treatment below).
ὅμοιοι αὐτῷ ἐσόμεθα (homoioi autō esometha) — “we shall be like him” (3:2), of future glorification at Christ’s appearing. Literal meaning: “like/similar to him.” English variants: “like him,” “we shall resemble him.” Contextual theological meaning: future glorification hope, resembling Christ morally and (in some sense) in resurrection-nature — not identity or absorption into the divine essence. Ukrainian: подібні до Нього. Risk: High. Directly adjacent to the theosis (обоження) risk the baseline already flags for sanctification (Critical) and for crucified_with_christ (Critical, Galatians 2:20) — Orthodox and Greek Catholic readers may naturally and legitimately hear this verse through their traditions’ developed theosis theology (becoming “partakers of the divine nature,” 2 Peter 1:4, a verse often read alongside this one). This curriculum’s Protestant-evangelical frame should state explicitly that “being like him” here denotes moral/relational Christlikeness and bodily resurrection-glory (per 3:2’s own qualifier, “for we shall see him as he is”), and should neither flatly deny nor silently assume the fuller theosis framework — following the same explicit-comparison discipline the baseline requires for grace and crucified-with-Christ language.
ἁγνίζει ἑαυτόν (hagnizei heauton) — “purifies himself” (3:3). Related to holy/ἅγιος family (baseline High-risk святий). Ukrainian: очищає себе. Risk: Medium.
ἁμαρτία … ἀνομία (hamartia … anomia) — “sin is lawlessness” (3:4). Literal meaning: ἀνομία = “without-law-ness,” rebellion against/rejection of God’s law. English variants: “lawlessness,” “transgression of the law.” Contextual theological meaning: 1 John’s own definition of sin, tying it to the baseline’s law and sin entries. Ukrainian: беззаконня. Risk: Medium. Must connect explicitly to закон (baseline law term) so readers see this as a definitional statement, not an isolated new category; avoid drift toward a vague “wickedness in general” that loses the specific law-relational sense.
ἐφανερώθη ἵνα τὰς ἁμαρτίας ἄρῃ … ἀναμάρτητος (ephanerōthē… anamartētos) — “he was manifested to take away sins… in him there is no sin” (3:5). Reinforces the sinlessness of Christ, grounding his qualification as ἱλασμός. Ukrainian: з’явився, щоб взяти на Себе грiхи … в Ньому немає грiха. Risk: High (Christological purity claim, foundational to atonement doctrine).
γεγεννημένος ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ … σπέρμα αὐτοῦ (gegennēmenos ek tou theou … sperma autou) — “born of God… his seed” (3:9). σπέρμα here = the divine generative principle/nature abiding in the believer (a distinct sense from the baseline’s seed_of_abraham/seed_of_david genealogical usage — same Greek word, different referent). Ukrainian: народжений від Бога … насіння Його. Risk: Critical (born of God, as throughout) with an added note: exposition must explicitly distinguish this metaphorical, generative sense of насіння from its established baseline usage for physical/covenantal descent (Abraham’s seed, David’s seed) to avoid readers importing genealogical-covenant categories into what is here a statement about the new birth’s inward, God-given nature.
οὐ δύναται ἁμαρτάνειν (ou dynatai hamartanein) — “cannot sin” (3:9). A famously difficult verse requiring careful exposition (present-tense habitual sense — “cannot go on sinning as a settled way of life” — reconciling it with 1:8-10 and 2:1’s acknowledgment that believers do sin). Ukrainian: не може грiшити. Risk: High. Must be explicitly reconciled with 1:8-2:2 in exposition (habitual/settled-pattern sense of the present tense) to avoid either (a) a perfectionist misreading that induces despair or denial, or (b) a licentious misreading that treats sin as irrelevant to genuine new birth.
Κάϊν … ἔσφαξεν (Kain … esphaxen) — “Cain… slew [his brother]” (3:12). See ἀδελφός/wartime “brotherly nations” risk note at 4:20 above; this is the narrative anchor of that risk. Ukrainian: Каїн … вбив. Risk: High.
ἀνθρωποκτόνος (anthrōpoktonos) — “murderer” (3:15, “everyone who hates his brother is a murderer”). Literal meaning: “man-killer.” English variants: “murderer.” Contextual theological meaning: hatred is morally equated with murder in its root disposition (cf. Matthew 5:21-22) — a strong, deliberately shocking claim not to be softened. Ukrainian: убивця / людиновбивця. Risk: Medium-High. Must retain full rhetorical force (“everyone who hates… is a murderer”) rather than softening to “is like a murderer”; given intensified wartime discourse about literal killing and just-war ethics, exposition should clarify 1 John’s specific point (hatred toward a fellow believer reveals the absence of new birth) without either flattening the moral seriousness of the claim or inviting confusion with contemporary just-war/self-defense debates the letter does not address.
ἔθηκεν τὴν ψυχὴν (ethēken tēn psychēn) — “laid down his life” (3:16, of Christ, and the pattern for believers, “we ought to lay down our lives for the brothers”). Literal meaning: “placed/laid down the soul/life.” English variants: “laid down his life,” “gave his life.” Contextual theological meaning: sacrificial, other-directed love as the concrete measure of ἀγάπη (3:16-18). Ukrainian: поклав життя (душу) Своє. Risk: High. Carries unusually direct and current resonance in wartime Ukraine, where laying down one’s life for others (soldiers, defenders) is a lived, immediate reality rather than a purely historical or metaphorical image. This pastoral resonance is a genuine asset for this doctrine and should be allowed to register, while keeping clear that 1 John’s own focus is sacrificial love and material generosity toward fellow believers in ordinary need (3:17-18, “if anyone has the world’s goods and sees his brother in need…”), not a general theology of martial sacrifice, which the text itself does not address.
τὰ σπλάγχνα (ta splanchna) — “compassion” (3:17, lit. “bowels/inward parts,” the seat of emotion in ancient thought). Ukrainian: милосердя / співчуття. Risk: Low.
ἐν ἔργῳ καὶ ἀληθείᾳ (en ergō kai alētheia) — “in deed and in truth” (3:18, contrasted with “in word or talk”). See extended ἀλήθεια treatment below (Chapter 5). Ukrainian: ділом і правдою (справдi). Risk: Medium-High (see ἀλήθεια note).
παρρησίαν πρὸς τὸν θεόν (parrēsian pros ton theon) — “confidence before God” (3:21), in prayer. See extended note at 4:17. Ukrainian: впевненість перед Богом. Risk: High (as at 4:17).
τηρῶμεν τὰς ἐντολὰς (tērōmen tas entolas) — “we keep his commandments” (3:22, 24; recurring at 5:2-3). Ukrainian: дотримуємося заповідей Його. Risk: Medium (as ἐντολή at 4:21).

Chapter 4, verses 1-6 (outside the core passage) — Testing the Spirits

Doctrine represented: Testing the Spirits (this section is the doctrine’s primary textual anchor; 4:7-21, the core passage proper, is treated in full above).

μὴ παντὶ πνεύματι πιστεύετε ἀλλὰ δοκιμάζετε τὰ πνεύματα (mē panti pneumati pisteuete alla dokimazete ta pneumata) — “do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits” (4:1). Literal meaning: δοκιμάζω = to test, examine, prove genuine (as one tests metal for purity). Semantic range: here τὰ πνεύματα (plural, lowercase-sense “spirits”) refers to the spiritual source or inspiration behind various prophetic/teaching claims circulating in the churches — distinct from ὁ Ἅγιον Πνεῦμα, the Holy Spirit himself (singular, personal, always distinguished in context). English variants: “test the spirits,” “examine the spirits,” “discern the spirits.” Contextual theological meaning: believers are called to actively, discerningly evaluate religious/prophetic claims against the apostolic christological standard (v.2-3), not accept every claim to spiritual authority uncritically. Ukrainian: випробовуйте духів. Risk: High. Two distinct, well-grounded Ukrainian risks: (1) lowercase, plural “spirits” here must NOT be capitalized or read as referring to the Holy Spirit — the opposite disambiguation direction from the baseline’s Galatians 5 bare-pneuma warning (there, bare lowercase πνεῦμα is the Holy Spirit and must be capitalized; here, plural τὰ πνεύματα are not the Holy Spirit and must remain lowercase/plural — both directions of this capitalization rule must be taught together as a matched pair). (2) “Testing spirits” risks resonance with the persistent post-Soviet folk-psychic culture already flagged in the baseline under spiritual_gifts (екстрасенси, fortune-tellers, “sensing energies”) — 1 John’s test is specifically doctrinal/christological (does this teaching confess Jesus Christ come in the flesh, v.2-3?), not an intuitive or experiential “sensing” of spiritual atmospheres, and must be taught as such to avoid collapsing biblical discernment into that folk-cultural category.
ὁμολογεῖ Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν ἐν σαρκὶ ἐληλυθότα (homologei Iēsoun Christon en sarki elēlythota) — “confesses Jesus Christ having come in the flesh” (4:2). See ὁμολογέω treatment at 1:9 and 4:15; here the confession’s content is the true incarnation, the positive test-standard corresponding to the ἀντίχριστος definition at 2:22-23. Ukrainian: визнає Ісуса Христа, що прийшов у тілі. Risk: Critical. Ties together the confession-vocabulary Critical risk (see 1:9) with the incarnation/antichrist Critical risk (see 2:18-22) — this is the letter’s doctrinal fulcrum for testing all spiritual claims, and the two risk patterns compound here.
πνεῦμα τοῦ θεοῦ … πνεῦμα τοῦ ἀντιχρίστου (pneuma tou theou … pneuma tou antichristou) — “Spirit of God… spirit of the antichrist” (4:2-3). Ukrainian: Дух Божий … дух антихриста. Risk: Critical. Exemplifies the same disambiguation pair as above: Дух (capitalized, personal, the Holy Spirit) versus дух (lowercase, an impersonal spiritual disposition/orientation, “the spirit of antichrist” as a pattern of false teaching already active in the world) — both forms occur in the same two verses and must be rendered with the capitalization distinction intact and explicitly taught, extending the baseline’s Galatians 5:16-25 spirit_bare_pneuma Critical-risk pattern into its most concentrated form yet across either curriculum.
νενικήκατε αὐτούς (nenikēkate autous) — “you have overcome them” (4:4). See extended νικάω treatment below (Chapter 5). Ukrainian: ви перемогли їх. Risk: High.
πνεῦμα τῆς ἀληθείας … πνεῦμα τῆς πλάνης (pneuma tēs alētheias … pneuma tēs planēs) — “Spirit of truth… spirit of error/deception” (4:6). Same capitalization-pair pattern as above. Ukrainian: Дух істини … дух омани. Risk: Critical (as above).

Chapter 5 (5:1-21) — Overcoming the World by Faith; The Threefold Witness; Assurance and Eternal Life; Sin unto Death; Closing Warning against Idols

Doctrines represented: Overcoming the World; Assurance of Salvation and Eternal Life.

πιστεύων ὅτι Ἰησοῦς ἐστιν ὁ Χριστὸς γεγέννηται ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ (pisteuōn hoti Iēsous estin ho Christos gegennētai ek tou theou) — “whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God” (5:1). Ties faith (baseline High-risk віра) directly to the “born of God” formula. Ukrainian: хто вірує, що Ісус є Христос, той народжений від Бога. Risk: Critical (compounding faith + born-of-God + Messiah baseline terms).
νικάω / νίκη (nikaō / nikē) — “to overcome / victory” (2:13-14; 4:4; 5:4-5, “everyone who has been born of God overcomes the world… this is the victory that has overcome the world, our faith”). Literal meaning: to conquer, prevail, win a victory (military/athletic contest imagery). Semantic range: spiritual conquest over the world’s opposition and the evil one, secured through faith in Christ, not human effort or strength. English variants: “overcome,” “conquer,” “be victorious,” “win the victory.” Contextual theological meaning: the doctrinal center of “Overcoming the World” — the decisive means of victory is specified precisely as πίστις (faith), not moral struggle, political action, or military strength. Ukrainian: перемагати / перемога. Risk: High, with an acute, specific, current Ukrainian resonance requiring careful handling: перемога (“victory”) is the single most emotionally and politically charged word in wartime Ukrainian public discourse (the stated national goal, invoked constantly in political, military, and civic speech since 2022) — a resonance of the same magnitude and kind the baseline already flags for слава (“Glory to Ukraine”) and свобода/воля (Galatians freedom, Critical). 1 John’s spiritual victory over the world through faith must not be silently collapsed into, treated as a devotional metaphor for, or made to compete with Ukraine’s legitimate and urgent wartime hope for military and political victory; the resonance may be allowed to register pastorally (this doctrine can speak powerfully and appropriately to a wartime readership) but the text’s own specific referent (victory over the world-system’s values and the evil one, achieved through faith in the incarnate, atoning, risen Christ) must remain the primary, explicit meaning. Recommend mandatory theologian review for every occurrence, following the same discipline the baseline requires for свобода/воля and слава.
δι’ ὕδατος καὶ αἵματος (di’ hydatos kai haimatos) — “through water and blood” (5:6, of Jesus Christ), together with τὸ πνεῦμα (to pneuma), “the Spirit” (5:6, 8) as the third witness — the well-known “threefold witness” of 5:6-8. Textual-critical note: the explicitly Trinitarian gloss found in some later manuscripts and some historic translations (“the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit… and these three are one,” the so-called Comma Johanneum) is widely regarded by modern textual critics as a later addition absent from the earliest Greek manuscripts; this analysis follows the majority modern critical text (water, blood, and Spirit as the three witnesses, 5:6, 8), consistent with standard modern translation practice. English variants: “water and blood,” “the Spirit, the water, and the blood.” Contextual theological meaning: contested among interpreters — most plausibly referring to the reality of Jesus’ incarnate life and death (water = his baptism and/or the water at his side on the cross, John 19:34; blood = his atoning death) as authenticated by the Spirit’s testimony, all bearing witness against the docetic-leaning denial of the true incarnation already opposed throughout the letter (2:22; 4:2-3). Ukrainian: вода і кров… Дух. Risk: Critical. This is among the most theologically freighted passages in the letter for a Ukrainian audience: both the Orthodox and Greek Catholic traditions have historically read “water” and “blood” here in close connection with the sacraments of Baptism (Хрещення, water) and the Eucharist (Причастя/Євхаристія, understood as Christ’s blood) respectively, a sacramentally rich reading with deep roots in patristic exegesis. This curriculum’s Protestant-evangelical frame reads the verse primarily as testimony to the reality and significance of Christ’s incarnate life and atoning death, not as a direct reference to the two sacraments as such. As with crucified_with_christ and flesh_versus_spirit in the Galatians baseline, this distinction must be stated explicitly in expository material rather than resolved silently toward either framework; mandatory theologian review, and the Comma Johanneum textual-critical question should be flagged transparently rather than silently harmonized.
μαρτυρία τοῦ θεοῦ (martyria tou theou) — “the testimony of God” (5:9-11). See μαρτυρέω note at 4:14. Ukrainian: свідчення Боже. Risk: Medium-High.
ζωὴν αἰώνιον (zōēn aiōnion) — “eternal life” (2:25; 3:15; 5:11, 13, 20, and throughout). Literal meaning: “life pertaining to the age [to come] / everlasting life.” Semantic range: not merely unending duration but a qualitatively new kind of life, God’s own life, already possessed by believers in the present (a strongly Johannine “already” emphasis) as well as its future consummation. English variants: “eternal life,” “everlasting life,” “life of the age to come.” Contextual theological meaning: the doctrinal center of “Assurance of Salvation and Eternal Life” — explicitly stated to be knowable and possessed now (5:13, “these things I have written… so that you may know that you have eternal life”), not only a future hope. Ukrainian: вічне життя. Risk: High. Must be anchored, per the baseline’s salvation discipline, to Christ’s person and finished work (5:11-12, “he who has the Son has life”) rather than defaulting unqualified into any one tradition’s fuller eschatological framework; the letter’s insistence on present, knowable possession (5:13) should be stressed as distinct from — though not opposed to — the two majority traditions’ greater emphasis on eternal life as the object of hope realized fully only in the age to come, following the same explicit-comparison discipline required elsewhere.
εἰδῆτε ὅτι ζωὴν ἔχετε αἰώνιον (eidēte hoti zōēn echete aiōnion) — “that you may know that you have eternal life” (5:13). οἴδα (know, settled/reflective knowledge) here, distinct from γινώσκω (relational/experiential knowing) used throughout the letter’s love-passages — a genuine, deliberate Johannine distinction between two Greek verbs for “know,” neither of which Ukrainian знати formally distinguishes. Ukrainian: щоб ви знали, що маєте вічне життя. Risk: High. This structural gap (two distinct Greek verbs for “to know,” γινώσκω and οἶδα, collapsing into one Ukrainian verb знати) recurs across the whole letter (γινώσκω: 2:3, 5, 13-14; 3:1, 6, 16, 19-20, 24; 4:2, 6-8, 13, 16; οἶδα: 2:20-21, 29; 3:2, 5, 14-15; 5:13, 15, 18-20) and must be carried by explicit exposition rather than the translated text alone, exactly as the baseline already requires for the untranslatable Greek singular/plural distinction in Galatians 3:16’s “seed” argument — flag as a structural translation-form gap, not a doctrinal drift risk per se, but one that could obscure the letter’s careful epistemology of assurance if left unaddressed.
παρρησία … κατὰ τὸ θέλημα αὐτοῦ (parrēsia … kata to thelēma autou) — “confidence… according to his will” (5:14-15), of answered prayer. Ukrainian: впевненість … згідно з волею Його. Risk: High (as at 3:21, 4:17); note also the baseline’s Galatians freedom register-split convention for воля (свобода/воля) — here воля translates θέλημα (“will”), a different sense from ἐλευθερία (“freedom”), and the two must not be confused despite the shared Ukrainian word воля for both “will” and (in Scripture-citation register) “freedom.” Flag this specific homograph for translator awareness.
ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον / μὴ πρὸς θάνατον (hamartia pros thanaton / mē pros thanaton) — “sin unto death / sin not unto death” (5:16-17). Literal meaning: sin leading to (physical) death, as opposed to sin not leading to death. Semantic range: much debated by interpreters — likely referring to a specific, unrepentant, entrenched sin pattern (possibly connected to the false teachers/antichrists already opposed in the letter) for which intercessory prayer for that person’s life is not commanded, contrasted with ordinary sins for which such prayer is encouraged; not a general doctrine of unforgivable sins or two fixed moral categories covering all sin. English variants: “sin that leads to death,” “mortal sin” (a translation to avoid, see below), “sin unto death.” Ukrainian: грiх до смерті / грiх не до смерті. Risk: Critical. Sharp, well-grounded collision risk: Catholic moral theology (shared in substantial part by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic tradition) has a fully developed, systematic doctrine of смертний грiх (“mortal sin,” a grave sin that severs a person from sanctifying grace, requiring sacramental confession and absolution to restore) as distinct from простий/легкий грiх (“venial sin”); the Orthodox tradition has a related though less systematized category. Rendering 5:16-17 as “смертний грiх / грiх не до смерті” risks importing this entire developed, foreign systematic framework wholesale into a difficult, debated, narrowly-occasioned verse that most Protestant-evangelical interpreters read quite differently (as noted above). Recommendation: use the more literal, less system-laden “грiх до смерті / грiх не до смерті” (sin unto/toward death, avoiding “mortal”) and require explicit exposition presenting the interpretive difficulty honestly rather than resolving it either toward the mortal/venial sin framework or toward a confident alternative reading the text itself does not fully specify. Mandatory theologian review.
ὁ γεννηθεὶς ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ οὐχ ἁμαρτάνει (ho gennētheis ek tou theou ouch hamartanei) — “he who has been born of God does not sin” (5:18). Restates 3:9’s difficult claim; same reconciliation-with-1:8-2:2 exposition requirement applies. Ukrainian: народжений від Бога не грiшить. Risk: High (as at 3:9).
ὁ κόσμος ὅλος ἐν τῷ πονηρῷ κεῖται (ho kosmos holos en tō ponērō keitai) — “the whole world lies in [the power of] the evil one” (5:19). Final, starkest statement of κόσμος’s negative sense in the letter. Ukrainian: цілий світ лежить у владі лукавого. Risk: High (κόσμος negative-sense, as throughout).
κόσμος (kosmos), consolidated note — across the letter κόσμος carries at least three distinct senses requiring disambiguation at every occurrence: (a) the created order/humanity generally, the object of God’s saving love (4:9, 14; John 3:16 parallel — positive/neutral); (b) the organized system of human life and desire opposed to God and dominated by the evil one (2:15-17; 4:5; 5:19 — sharply negative); (c) “everyone” in a loose, non-technical sense (occasionally). Ukrainian: світ (consistently). Risk: High, consolidated across the whole book. Distinct from мир (peace, baseline High-risk term, unrelated homograph risk already flagged for Romans 5:1/8:6) — a genuine asset of Ukrainian over Russian here, since світ (world) and мир (peace) are lexically and orthographically fully distinct in Ukrainian, unlike Russian’s мир/мир homograph; this reduces (but does not eliminate) one layer of the baseline’s peace-related risk when translating 1 John specifically. The primary remaining risk is doctrinal disambiguation among κόσμος’s three senses above, which must be made explicit at each occurrence rather than left to a single undifferentiated світ.
ὁ ἀληθινός (ho alēthinos) — “the true one” (5:20, of God, “we know him who is true”). Related to the ἀλήθεια (truth) word-family — see consolidated note below. Ukrainian: Істинний. Risk: Medium-High.
ἀλήθεια (alētheia), consolidated note — “truth” (1:6, 8; 2:4, 21; 3:18-19; 4:6; 5:20 and throughout — one of the letter’s most frequent terms). Literal meaning: truth, reality, that which is not concealed. Semantic range: propositional truth (correct doctrine, especially christological, 4:6), relational/existential truthfulness (walking “in truth,” acting “in deed and in truth,” 3:18), and personal designation (God/Christ as “the true one,” 5:20). English variants: “truth,” “the truth,” “truly,” “in truth.” Contextual theological meaning: truth in 1 John is never merely abstract or philosophical but always tied to right confession of Christ’s identity and to a corresponding manner of life. Ukrainian: правда (proposed as primary rendering, following Ohienko’s practice for ἀλήθεια, e.g., John 14:6) / істина (for more abstract/philosophical register where appropriate). Risk: High, for two distinct, well-grounded reasons. (1) Ukrainian правда shares its root with праведність (righteousness, baseline Critical term) — правда/правий/праведний — creating a false-friend adjacency risk parallel to, though distinct from, the baseline’s warning against справедливість for праведність; exposition should make clear ἀλήθεια (правда, truth/reality) and δικαιοσύνη (праведність, righteousness/right standing) are related but distinct biblical categories, not interchangeable. (2) Правда carries very heavy, current Ukrainian national-political resonance (a familiar patriotic and journalistic register — “наша правда переможе,” “правда must be told,” the historic underground/dissident press name Правда and its ideological opposite uses under Soviet rule) comparable in kind to the baseline’s already-flagged risk for слава and to this document’s own new flag for перемога above. 1 John’s christological, relational sense of truth must not be silently absorbed into, or diluted by, this patriotic/journalistic register, even though (as with слава and перемога) the resonance may be permitted to register pastorally without replacing the theological referent.

Summary of Structural (Non-Doctrinal) Translation-Form Gaps Identified

For completeness, alongside the doctrinal risks above, this analysis identifies the following genuine Greek-to-Ukrainian structural gaps requiring exposition rather than lexical solution (parallel to the baseline’s treatment of Galatians 3:16’s seed singular/plural gap):

γινώσκω vs. οἶδα — two distinct Greek verbs for “know” (relational/ongoing vs. settled/reflective), both rendered by the single Ukrainian verb знати; recurs at high density throughout the letter and is directly load-bearing for the doctrine of Assurance (5:13).
σάρξ vs. σῶμα — both rendered тіло; inherited directly from the Galatians baseline, recurring at 2:16 and 4:2.
βίος vs. ζωή — two distinct words for “(this-worldly) life” and “(especially eternal) life,” both potentially rendered життя; occurs at 2:16 (βίος) against the letter’s dominant ζωή usage.
παράκλητος applied to two different Persons (Christ, 1 John 2:1; the Holy Spirit, John 14-16) — a cross-book consistency question for future curricula, not resolvable within 1 John alone.

This document extends but never contradicts the baseline Romans/Galatians translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, and doctrine_risk_registry.json. All baseline term renderings are reused exactly. New terms proposed here await Phase 1 Steps 2-8 confirmation and formal entry into an updated translation memory before Phase 2 processing.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.