Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Linguistic Gap Analysis

Linguistic Gap Analysis — Matthew (Ukrainian)

0. Scope and Method

This analysis extends the baseline Romans/Galatians Language Package (translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, doctrine_risk_registry.json) to the Matthew curriculum, covering all 28 chapters and anchored on the core passage, the Beatitudes (5:1-12). It does not repeat baseline entries already settled (e.g. Ісус, Бог, Святий Дух) except where Matthew’s usage introduces a new gap or intensifies an existing one. Findings here feed directly into the Core Glossary (08_core_glossary.md) and the extended term registry.

Two distinct linguistic problems are tracked separately, per PRD Phase 1 convention:

  • Missing vocabulary — a source concept for which standard Ukrainian has no clean, single, unambiguous equivalent, requiring compounding, paraphrase, or careful first-occurrence glossing.
  • Crowded semantic neighborhoods — a source concept for which standard Ukrainian does have a ready term, but that term already carries other live senses (liturgical, folk-devotional, political, wartime, or Soviet-era) that compete for the reader’s attention and must be explicitly fenced off in exposition.

Matthew’s specific linguistic-risk profile differs from Romans/Galatians in three respects, each recurring below: (1) Matthew is the New Testament’s own source text for several terms whose later institutional and jurisdictional weight in Ukraine did not yet exist for the original audience (church, keys, tell-it-to-the-church, tradition of the elders); (2) Matthew’s narrative genre supplies dense liturgical-feast material (Transfiguration, Beatitudes-as-antiphon, Triumphal Entry) that risks over-familiarity flattening rather than under-familiarity confusion; (3) Matthew’s eschatological material (ch. 13, 24-25) intersects with distinctly Ukrainian folk-devotional imagery (Страшний Суд iconography) not present to the same degree in Romans/Galatians.


1. Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix

DoctrineAvailable Ukrainian Term(s)WeaknessesRecommended Strategy
The Kingdom of HeavenЦарство Небесне (Matthew’s own circumlocution); Царство Боже (baseline, also used by Matthew at 12:28, 19:24, 21:31, 21:43)“Небесне” defaults in ordinary religious speech to an exclusively future, post-mortem destination, undercutting Matthew’s repeated “already breaking in” force (4:17; 12:28); risk of readers concluding two phrases name two doctrinesUse Царство Небесне as the primary curriculum term (matches Matthew’s own usage pattern and the Ohienko text) but state explicitly at first occurrence (3:2/5:3) that it is identical in referent to Царство Боже; teach the already/not-yet tension explicitly rather than let “Небесне” resolve it toward future-only
Jesus as the Promised Messiah and Son of DavidМесія / Христос (baseline); Син Давидів (new, parallel to baseline’s “з насіння Давидового”)Христос functions as an inert surname in everyday speech (baseline already notes this); Син Давидів requires 2 Sam 7 covenant background most readers lack from liturgical-excerpt exposure aloneRe-surface “Anointed One” sense explicitly at 1:1 and 16:16; supply brief 2 Samuel 7 background note at first occurrence of Син Давидів (1:1) rather than assuming it
Fulfillment of Old Testament Prophecyпророки (baseline); щоб сповнилося сказане [пророком] (fulfillment formula, new structural term)Risk of OT prophecy reading as generic ancient religious literature rather than specific, historically anchored promise-and-fulfillment; the recurring formula could be rendered inconsistently across its ~12 occurrences, weakening its function as a structural markerRender the fulfillment formula identically at every occurrence (1:22; 2:15,17,23; 4:14; 8:17; 12:17; 13:35; 21:4; 26:56; 27:9); teach it explicitly as a recurring literary signal readers should learn to recognize
The Authority of Jesus’ Teachingвлада (new, naming this doctrine directly)влада is the ordinary word for “the authorities/the government” — acutely live under current martial-law and wartime governance discourse; risk of 7:29/28:18 being heard as veiled political commentaryExtend the baseline’s existing Romans 13 caution explicitly; anchor each occurrence (7:29; 9:6,8; 21:23-27; 28:18) to Jesus’ self-authenticating teaching and person, never to contemporary state authority debates
Righteousness Exceeding the Phariseesправедність (baseline, Critical); книжники та фарисеї (new)праведність carries the baseline’s forensic/imputed sense from Romans; Matthew’s ethical-conduct emphasis (5:20, 6:1, 6:33) must be taught as complementary, not competing; книжники та фарисеї risks anti-Jewish generalization given Ukraine’s history of antisemitic violenceTeach both senses of праведність explicitly as two facets of one reality (declared righteous → lived righteousness); anchor scribes/Pharisees firmly as first-century intra-Jewish dispute at every occurrence, never a timeless trope
The Church and Church Disciplineцерква (baseline, Critical); громада (baseline’s jurisdiction-neutral synonym)церква is acutely live and jurisdictionally contested (OCU/UOC/UGCC); 16:18 is the NT’s founding application of this word, directly implicated in East-West papal-primacy debate; 18:15-20 supplies the discipline process, itself entangled with sacramental confession/keys authorityUse церква for the plain textual sense but pair with громада where local-assembly emphasis is needed; explicit theologian instruction: present 16:18-19 and 18:15-20 without adjudicating papal primacy or endorsing any one jurisdiction’s disciplinary practice
The Great Commissionмісія / благовістя (baseline); зробіть учнями всі народи (new, core command)ἔθνη must render as народи, never погани, given the latter’s derogatory colloquial drift; учень’s everyday “pupil” register risks flattening total-life discipleship into information-transferEnforce народи absolutely at 28:19; connect зробіть учнями explicitly back to the учень entries throughout the Gospel so Great Commission and Discipleship read as one doctrine, not two
Judgment and the End of the Ageкінець віку (new); вічна кара / життя вічне (new, grammatically parallel pair); геєна (new)кінець віку risks conflation with cosmic annihilation if світ (“world”) is substituted; вічна кара/життя вічне must retain identical register/intensity as Matthew’s parallel grammar intends; геєна risks substitution by пекло, importing dense folk-devotional Страшний Суд iconography extraneous to the textNever substitute світ for вік; keep вічна кара and життя вічне lexically and tonally matched; use геєна exclusively, never пекло, with explicit first-occurrence gloss distinguishing it from folk Last-Judgment imagery
Discipleship and the Cost of Following Jesusучень (new); хрест (new, metaphorical); втратить/знайде своє життя (new)учень’s schoolchild register under-weights cost; хрест’s cultural ubiquity (jewelry, roadside shrines, national symbolism) risks decorative flattening; душа’s strong body/soul dualism (reinforced by icon theology) risks narrowing ψυχή’s holistic “whole life” senseGloss учень at first occurrence as total-life allegiance, not enrollment; explicitly distinguish “take up your cross” (16:24) from decorative/national uses of хрест; render lose/find “life” with life/self framing, not soul-only

2. Missing Vocabulary (No Clean Ukrainian Equivalent)

These concepts require compounding, paraphrase, or mandatory first-occurrence glossing because standard Ukrainian has no single existing word carrying the intended sense without addition.

ConceptGapResolution
πτωχὸς τῷ πνεύματι (“poor in spirit,” 5:3)No single Ukrainian word for “recognized spiritual destitution/dependence” distinct from literal poverty or pitiable weaknessCompound вбогий духом retained (Ohienko), with mandatory gloss distinguishing spiritual dependence from вбогий’s colloquial “pathetic” drift
πραΰς (“meek,” 5:5)лагідний names a personality trait (gentleness), not Matthew’s active sense of controlled strength/deliberate non-self-vindicationRetain лагідний but gloss explicitly as strength-under-restraint, not passivity, given wartime self-defense sensitivities
ὀλιγόπιστος (“little faith”)No single-word Ukrainian equivalent for “one who trusts but insufficiently”; малої віри is a genitive descriptive phrase, not a lexical itemRetain the phrase малої віри with explicit gloss as gentle in-relationship correction, not condemnation of unbelief
ψυχή in the “lose/find life” sayings (10:39; 16:25)Ukrainian forces a choice between життя (life, but risks reducing to biological existence) and душа (soul, but risks narrowing to the immaterial alone)Render “своє життя (душу)” — pairing both terms — with exposition clarifying the sense is one’s whole self/existence
στοιχεῖα-type elemental/structural terms are absent from Matthew, but an analogous gap appears with μυστήρια τῆς βασιλείας (“mysteries of the kingdom,” 13:11)таємниці names hidden information generically; no Ukrainian term isolates “previously hidden divine revelation now disclosed” without collision with Тайна/Таїнство (Sacrament)Retain таємниці Царства with mandatory fencing gloss distinguishing it from the Seven Holy Mysteries/Sacraments
παράδοσις τῶν πρεσβυτέρων (“tradition of the elders,” 15:1-9)No compact Ukrainian phrase distinguishes “specific rabbinic legal rulings criticized here” from Передання (Holy Tradition) as a positively-regarded theological categoryUse expanded phrase людське передання старійшин (not bare передання) to keep the criticized referent visibly narrow
κλεῖδας τῆς βασιλείας / δήσῃς / λύσῃς (“keys… bind… loose,” 16:19; 18:18)Ukrainian ключі and зв’язати/розв’язати are lexically available but the underlying rabbinic halakhic-declaration concept has no native equivalent outside of already-contested sacramental-confession theologyRender literally (ключі Царства Небесного / зв’яжеш… розв’яжеш) with mandatory theologian-supplied exposition explaining rabbinic background, explicitly not resolving the papal-primacy question
σταυρόν αὐτοῦ (“his cross,” metaphorical, 16:24)Ukrainian хрест names both the metaphor and the omnipresent physical/cultural object; no separate word isolates the costly-discipleship sense from the decorative/national oneRetain хрест but require explicit contextual anchoring to costly self-denial at first occurrence in any exposition
τάλαντα (“talents,” 25:14-30)таланти is a false friend, defaulting to “natural ability” in modern Ukrainian, echoing the baseline’s already-rejected талан for “grace”Retain таланти but mandatory gloss: entrusted resources/responsibility of any kind, not innate ability

3. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods (Existing Terms Needing Fencing)

These Ukrainian terms are correct and unavoidable, but each already carries competing live senses (liturgical, folk-devotional, political, wartime, or Soviet-era) that must be explicitly fenced off from the text’s intended meaning.

Ukrainian TermCompeting Senses Already Live in UkrainianFencing Required
Царство НебеснеPopular “heaven when you die” default senseFence against future-only reading; teach already/not-yet
блаженнийChanted Beatitudes antiphon in both OCU/UOC and UGCC Divine LiturgyFence against memorized-formula flattening; restore personal, startling force
вбогий (духом)Colloquial “pathetic/wretched”Fence against pejorative reading
лагіднийPassive/soft personality trait; wartime self-defense debateFence against passivity; frame as restrained strength
миротворецьLive political/military term: international peacekeepers, ceasefire negotiators, contested “premature capitulation” discourseFence firmly: interpersonal reconciliation flowing from peace with God, not the political peace-vs-resistance debate
мир (10:34, “not peace but a sword”)Acute post-2022 wartime weight as opposite-of-war; homograph with “world”Fence hard: referent is familial/social division, not literal warfare or a statement about the war
влада”The authorities/the government,” martial-law and wartime governance discourseFence: Jesus’ self-authenticating and universal (28:18) authority is not commentary on state authority
Передання (via людське передання старійшин)Positively-regarded Holy Tradition category in Orthodox/Greek Catholic theologyFence: Jesus’ target is specific rabbinic rulings, not Передання as a category
таємниці (Царства)Тайна/Таїнство = SacramentFence: previously-hidden revealed truth, not sacramental rite
церква / збудую ЦерквуOCU/UOC/UGCC jurisdictional contest; East-West papal-primacy debateFence: universal people of God; use громада where local-assembly sense helps sidestep jurisdiction
ключі Царства / зв’язати-розв’язатиSacramental Confession authority claims across traditionsFence: teach function without resolving papal-primacy in either direction
хрестOmnipresent decorative/national-cultural symbol (jewelry, roadside shrines, national identity)Fence: costly self-denial, not ornament or national emblem
преобразився/ПреображенняMajor shared liturgical feast; Palamite uncreated-light (Tabor light) theologyFence: narrative claims a temporary revelatory disclosure, without importing the fuller theosis framework as textually asserted
геєна (risk if substituted with пекло)пекло carries dense Страшний Суд folk-iconographic tradition (partly Dante-influenced, extra-biblical)Fence: use геєна exclusively; never let folk hell-imagery substitute for the text’s own claim
таланти”Natural ability/gift” in modern usageFence: entrusted resources, not innate talent
найменші брати МоїHighly active, positive wartime humanitarian-ministry culture (aid to displaced, wounded, bereaved)Retain the resonance as an asset but fence: preserve the passage’s judgment-context weight, not humanitarian ethics alone
діва (1:23)Marian dogmatic apparatus: Приснодіва, БогородицяFence: state Matthew’s own claim precisely without importing or flattening the fuller Marian framework
поклонятися (28:9, 17 vs. 2:11, 8:2)Single verb spans respectful-obeisance and full-divine-worship sensesFence by context: distinguish weaker occurrences from the climactic post-resurrection full-worship sense
любов (5:44; 22:37-39)Crowded neighborhood: romantic, familial, patriotic, neighbor-love all share this word (inherited baseline risk, intensified by enemy-love command amid war)Fence: committed active good, explicitly including enemies, not sentiment
хула на ДухаPastoral scrupulosity, intensified by wartime anxietyFence: persistent willful rejection, not momentary doubt or fear
вся влада / прихід Сина Людськогоявлення already rejected baseline term for incarnation; avoid collisionFence: parousia is public/visible/cosmic, not secret or localized, given some sectarian movements’ claims

4. Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions

TermDecisionRationale
Осанна (Hosanna)Transliterate, paired with Сину ДавидовомуEstablished liturgical transliteration; no native equivalent captures the acclamation’s force
ЕммануїлTransliterate + retain Matthew’s own gloss (“Бог з нами”)Matthew supplies his own translation in the source text (1:23); preserve this self-glossing feature rather than assuming prior reader knowledge
ГеєнаTransliterate (not пекло)Avoids importing extraneous folk-devotional Страшний Суд imagery; Ohienko precedent
Мудреці зі Сходу / волхвиParaphrase for exposition (мудреці зі Сходу); reserve transliteration/loanword (волхви) for direct Scripture citation onlyволхви carries residual pre-Christian Kyivan Rus’ pagan-priest and post-Soviet folk-psychic associations; exposition needs the neutral descriptive phrase, citation register can retain the traditional word with a clarifying note
Осанна, амінь, алілуя, АвваTransliterate, inherited from baselineAlready established Ohienko forms; no change needed
Месія / ХристосTransliterate (already established loanwords)Baseline term; re-surface the “Anointed One” sense in exposition rather than re-translating
Талант(и)Do NOT treat as a transliteration-only technical term; retain as ordinary Ukrainian word with mandatory glossUnlike Осанна/Геєна, таланти is not a specialized loanword needing preservation — it is a false-friend ordinary word needing correction, not transliteration
Прихід (Parousia)Paraphrase, not transliterate”Парусія” is not established in general Ukrainian Bible usage; прихід conveys the sense plainly. Do not use явлення (baseline-rejected for incarnation) to avoid term collision
Субота (Sabbath)Paraphrase/native term, not transliterateсубота is the standard, unambiguous native word; no transliteration needed
Гидота спустошення (abomination of desolation)Paraphrase (Ohienko’s established phrase), not transliterateDescriptive phrase already fixed in Ukrainian Bible tradition; transliterating the Greek would produce an opaque neologism
Ключі Царства / зв’язати-розв’язатиParaphrase (literal translation), not transliterateThe underlying rabbinic halakhic concept has no transliterable Greek/Hebrew loanword tradition in Ukrainian; must be exposited, not transliterated
Син Людський / Син ДавидівParaphrase (calque translation), not transliterateTitles must remain transparent compound phrases so their internal logic (Daniel 7; 2 Samuel 7) can be taught; transliteration would obscure rather than aid

5. Ranked List of Highest-Risk Ambiguities

Ranked by combined severity of (a) doctrinal distortion potential, (b) live Ukrainian jurisdictional/political entanglement, and (c) wartime-context misreading risk. All items below require mandatory human theologian review per the escalation rules inherited from 12_ai_translation_requirements.md.

  1. Keys of the Kingdom / bind and loose (16:19; 18:18) — Directly load-bearing for centuries-old East-West papal-primacy debate, live and unresolved across OCU/UOC/UGCC in Ukraine today; any translation choice risks being read as adjudicating that debate.
  2. Church founding statement, “I will build my church” (16:18) — The NT’s first application of ἐκκλησία to the Christian community; entangled with the same jurisdictional contest as #1, compounded by post-2022 public distrust specifically toward the Moscow-linked UOC.
  3. “Tell it to the church” / church discipline process (18:15-17) — Risk of implicitly endorsing one jurisdiction’s formal disciplinary/excommunication procedure; parallels the baseline’s existing “anathema” caution from Galatians.
  4. Gehenna vs. пекло (5:22,29-30; 10:28; 18:9; 23:15,33) — Substitution with пекло would import a dense, extraneous, partly non-biblical folk-iconographic Last Judgment tradition; lexical choice alone (геєна vs. пекло) determines whether this risk is avoided.
  5. Eternal punishment / eternal life parallelism (25:46) — The single starkest final-judgment statement in the Gospel; Matthew’s deliberate grammatical parallel (identical αἰώνιος) must not be softened by mismatched Ukrainian register between вічна кара and життя вічне.
  6. “Not peace but a sword” (10:34) — Acute risk of being heard, in a country at war since 2022, as endorsing armed conflict or opposing peace-seeking; actual referent is familial/social division from allegiance to Christ.
  7. Peacemakers (5:9) — Core-passage term; миротворець is live, contested vocabulary in current ceasefire/peacekeeping political discourse; the Beatitude’s interpersonal-reconciliation sense must not collapse into, or be read as commentary on, that debate.
  8. Kingdom of Heaven vs. Kingdom of God dual phrasing (throughout; esp. 3:2 vs. 12:28) — Risk that readers infer two distinct doctrines from Matthew’s two phrases; also risk of “Небесне” defaulting to future-only, undercutting the already/not-yet tension central to the whole Gospel.
  9. Mysteries of the Kingdom (13:11) vs. Тайна/Таїнство — Direct lexical collision with Sacrament terminology central to Orthodox and Greek Catholic sacramental life; requires explicit fencing to avoid a sacramental misreading of Jesus’ parabolic teaching method.
  10. Tradition of the elders (15:1-9) vs. Передання — Risk of Jesus being heard as condemning Holy Tradition as a category rather than his specific historical target (rabbinic legal rulings nullifying God’s command).
  11. Righteousness exceeding the Pharisees (5:20) — праведність’s forensic/ethical duality — Inherits the baseline’s Critical grace/righteousness tension across three living traditions, now compounded by Matthew’s own distinct ethical-conduct emphasis needing explicit complementary framing.
  12. Transfiguration (17:1-8) — Major shared liturgical feast tied to Palamite uncreated-light theosis theology; narrative claim (temporary revelatory disclosure) risks being silently expanded into, or contracted from, that fuller theological framework.
  13. Authority — влада (7:29; 9:6,8; 21:23-27; 28:18) — Live collision with wartime governance/martial-law discourse; extends the baseline’s Romans 13 caution with a full doctrine built on this term.
  14. Blasphemy against the Spirit (12:31-32) — High pastoral-scrupulosity risk, intensified by wartime anxiety; readers may wrongly fear they have committed this specific, narrowly-defined sin.
  15. “Take up your cross” (16:24) — хрест’s cultural ubiquity — Risk of the metaphor flattening into decorative or national-symbolic use given хрест’s omnipresence in Ukrainian visual and civic culture.
  16. Virgin conception — діва (1:23) — Entangled with the fuller Marian dogmatic apparatus (Приснодіва, Богородиця) shared by Orthodox and Greek Catholic traditions, beyond Matthew’s own textual claim.
  17. Son of Man (8:20; 9:6; 12:8; 16:13-28; chs. 24-26) — Risk of being heard as a merely humble self-designation without the Daniel 7 exaltation background, losing its claim to divine authority.
  18. “Least of these my brothers” (25:40,45) — Strong positive wartime humanitarian-ministry resonance risks flattening the passage into humanitarian ethics alone, losing its judgment-context weight.
  19. Worship — поклонятися (2:11; 8:2; 28:9,17) — Single Ukrainian verb spans respectful obeisance and full divine worship; risk of uniform-sense reading obscuring the climactic post-resurrection confession.
  20. Talents (25:14-30) — False-friend risk (natural ability vs. entrusted resource), echoing the baseline’s already-rejected талан for “grace”; low doctrinal severity but high frequency of casual misreading.

6. Full-Book Coverage Confirmation (Matthew 1-28)

Per the PRD Phase 1 full-book coverage mandate, every chapter has been reviewed. Chapters contributing new terms or doctrines are cross-referenced above; chapters below contributing no new terms beyond those already treated are explicitly noted as reviewed.

Chapter(s)Coverage Status
1Contributes: Son of David, Virgin, Emmanuel, Incarnation, seed-of-David genealogy — treated above
2Contributes: Magi, fulfillment formula (first occurrence) — treated above
3Contributes: Repentance, Baptism (John’s), Kingdom of Heaven (first occurrence), Son of God (baptism voice) — treated above
4Contributes: Temptation, Kingdom of Heaven inaugurated (4:17) — treated above
5:1-12 (core passage)Contributes: Blessed, poor in spirit, meek, peacemakers, persecuted for righteousness — treated above in full
5:13-48Contributes: fulfill the Law (5:17), righteousness exceeding the Pharisees (5:20) — treated above; remainder (salt/light, anger, oaths, love enemies) uses already-established terms (любов, гнів — reviewed, no new gap)
6Reviewed — Lord’s Prayer uses baseline Отець and established terms; no new gaps beyond those already recorded
7Contributes: Authority of Jesus’ teaching (7:28-29) — treated above; golden rule and narrow gate use established vocabulary, reviewed
8Contributes: Faith (centurion), Son of Man (8:20), little faith — treated above
9Reviewed — forgiveness of sins, faith, calling of Matthew use already-established terms; no new gap
10Contributes: Mission/commissioning of the Twelve, “not peace but a sword” (10:34), lose/find life (10:39) — treated above
11Contributes: Easy yoke/rest (11:28-30) — treated above; John the Baptist material reviewed, no new gap
12Contributes: Sabbath/Lord of the Sabbath, blasphemy against the Spirit (12:31-32), Kingdom of God (explicit, 12:28) — treated above
13Contributes: Parable, mysteries of the Kingdom, end of the age (first occurrence) — treated above
14Reviewed — feeding of the 5,000, walking on water; little faith and worship terms already treated under ch. 8/28 entries
15Contributes: Tradition of the elders (15:1-9) — treated above; Canaanite woman’s faith reviewed under established faith entry
16Contributes: Peter’s confession (Son of God), church founding statement, keys of the Kingdom, cross (discipleship), lose/find life reprise — treated above
17Contributes: Transfiguration — treated above; Son of Man suffering prediction reviewed under existing entry
18Contributes: “Tell it to the church,” gathered in my name — treated above; keys/bind-loose reprise treated at ch. 16
19Contributes: Eternal life (19:16,29) — treated above; divorce teaching and rich young man use established vocabulary, reviewed
20Contributes: Ransom (20:28) — treated above; Laborers in the Vineyard reviewed under baseline grace/reward caution
21Contributes: Hosanna to the Son of David, cornerstone — treated above; temple-cleansing and authority-questioned material reviewed under existing authority entry
22Contributes: Many called few chosen (22:14) — treated above; greatest commandment (love) reviewed under existing любов entry; tribute to Caesar reviewed under existing authority entry
23Contributes: Hypocrites, scribes and Pharisees (climactic use) — treated above; Gehenna reference reviewed under ch. 5/10/18 entry
24Contributes: End of the age, abomination of desolation, Parousia, “this generation” — treated above
25Contributes: Talents parable, “least of these,” eternal punishment — treated above
26Contributes: New covenant, forgiveness of sins (institution), Gethsemane — treated above; betrayal narrative reviewed, no additional new gap
27Contributes: Cry of dereliction (27:46), worship/Son of God (centurion, 27:54) — treated above; crucifixion narrative otherwise reviewed under established terms
28Contributes: Resurrection (narrated), worship (climactic), Great Commission, all authority given, make disciples of all nations, Trinitarian baptismal formula, teaching to observe, “I am with you always” — treated above

All 28 chapters have been reviewed against the doctrine list and the baseline Language Package; no chapter has been silently omitted. This analysis, together with 08_core_glossary.md, is ready to inform the extended translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, and doctrine_risk_registry.json for Phase 2 processing of the Matthew curriculum.


This document extends, and must be loaded alongside, the baseline Romans/Galatians Language Package. It does not contradict any baseline entry; all baseline Critical/High terms retain their established Ukrainian renderings unchanged.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words