Log in

or use your email

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Requirements bundle

Cross-Reference Analysis

09 Cross-Reference and Theme Analysis — 2 Corinthians (Full Book) | English → Arabic

Purpose and Method

This document maps every Old Testament quotation and allusion, every messianic reference, and every typological pattern in 2 Corinthians 1–13, and cross-references each to its parallel treatment in the Romans Language Package where one exists. It exists to prevent two failure modes in Phase 2: (1) translating a quotation shared with — or thematically parallel to — Romans in a way that is not lexically consistent with the baseline translation_memory.json, and (2) treating an OT quotation as theologically neutral vocabulary when its background (Mosaic law, sacrificial system, covenant-renewal promises, prophetic authentication tests) carries the same class of Islamic-doctrine collision risk documented in the baseline.

Citation format: all citations in this document use the normalizable English-book-name + chapter:verse convention (e.g., “2 Corinthians 5:21”, “Genesis 15:6”, “Isaiah 49:8”), matching the convention already used in doctrine_risk_registry.json. For Phase 2 output in destination-language documents, book names must follow the Van Dyck/NAV Arabic forms already established in 12_ai_translation_requirements.md (e.g., Romans = رومية, Genesis = التكوين, Isaiah = إشعياء). The Arabic form for this curriculum’s own book is ٢ كورنثوس (2 Corinthians) — this exact form must be used consistently in every Phase 2 Arabic-language document header and citation.


PART A: Cross-Reference Matrix

Columns: Passage (2 Corinthians) | Theme | Related Character(s) | OT/NT Connection | Romans/Curriculum Parallel | Translation Sensitivity & Risk

PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionRomans/Curriculum ParallelTranslation Sensitivity & Risk
2 Corinthians 1:3Fatherhood and comfort of GodGod the FatherEchoes divine-compassion titles: Psalm 103:13; Isaiah 63:16No direct Romans lexical parallel; conceptually parallel to Romans 8:15’s Abba-Father intimacyMedium. الآب (baseline Critical) reused; “Father of mercies/comforts” must retain personal, relational warmth, distinct from a generic attribute-title reading of Allah’s raḥmah.
2 Corinthians 1:20Fulfillment of God’s promises in ChristChristGeneral allusion to the whole OT promise-trajectory (Abrahamic, Davidic, New Covenant promises)Direct thematic parallel: Romans 15:8, “Christ became a servant… to confirm the promises”High. Must be framed as fulfillment, not one link in a chain of successive abrogating revelations (see naskh risk, Part C).
2 Corinthians 1:22; 5:5The Spirit as down payment/guaranteeHoly SpiritEchoes OT firstfruits offering pattern (Leviticus 23:10)Direct lexical/doctrinal parallel: Romans 8:23, “firstfruits of the Spirit”High. ختم/عربون — see baseline glossary entry B8; خاتم root collision with خاتم النبيين requires a standing clarifying note every occurrence.
2 Corinthians 2:14Triumphal procession of ChristChrist, PaulPossible background resonance with divine-victory procession imagery (cf. Psalm 68:17-18)No direct Romans parallelLow-Medium. Roman-triumph cultural background may need brief explanatory scaffolding; no doctrinal collision.
2 Corinthians 2:15-16Fragrance of the knowledge of ChristPaul, believersEchoes sacrificial “pleasing aroma” language: Genesis 8:21; Leviticus 1:9,13,17No direct Romans parallelLow. Sacrificial-aroma metaphor transfers cleanly; no Islamic collision identified.
2 Corinthians 3:3New covenant written on hearts, not stoneMoses, Israel, believersDirect allusion: Exodus 31:18; 34:1 (tablets of stone); Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 11:19; 36:26 (new heart)Direct doctrinal parallel: Romans 2:15 (“law written on their hearts”); Romans 7:6 (serving in newness of Spirit, not oldness of letter)Critical. Anchor term of New Covenant doctrine; see Part C rendering rule for Jeremiah 31:31-34.
2 Corinthians 3:6Letter kills, Spirit gives lifeMoses (implicit), the SpiritDirect conceptual quotation of Jeremiah 31:31-34’s new-covenant promiseDirect parallel: Romans 7:6; Romans 8:2 (law of the Spirit of life)Critical. Must be scoped to the Mosaic law’s inability to regenerate, never scripture generally; see baseline note on الناموس (Critical) and Part C.
2 Corinthians 3:7-11Fading glory of the old covenant ministryMosesDirect allusion: Exodus 34:29-35 (Moses’ radiant, veiled face)Thematic parallel: Romans 7:12 (the law is holy, just, good) yet insufficient for life, cf. Romans 8:3High. Moses is a positively-regarded, shared Quranic prophet-figure (Mūsā); his glory here is a type pointing toward, and surpassed by, Christ’s greater and permanent glory — this typological direction must be taught explicitly, not assumed.
2 Corinthians 3:13-14Veil over Moses’ face; veil over mindsMoses, IsraelDirect quotation/allusion: Exodus 34:33-35No direct Romans lexical parallel; thematic parallel: Romans 11:8, quoting Isaiah 29:10/Deuteronomy 29:4 (a “spirit of stupor,” eyes that do not see)High. See baseline glossary B14 — render veil as غطاء; never برقع or حجاب.
2 Corinthians 3:16Removal of the veil upon turning to the LordIsrael, believersDirect allusion: Exodus 34:34Direct parallel: Romans 11:23-26 (Israel’s partial hardening, and its future removal “when they turn”)Critical. Ties directly to the baseline’s “israel” (High) and “unity_of_jews_and_gentiles” (High) doctrine notes; must not be read through a contemporary political lens.
2 Corinthians 3:18Believers transformed into Christ’s glory-image, unveiledBelievers, Moses (background)Continues Exodus 34:29-35 allusion; also echoes Exodus 33:18-23 (Moses beholding God’s glory)Direct parallel: Romans 8:29 (conformed to the image of his Son); Romans 12:2 (transformed by renewal of mind)Medium. صورة (image) — see baseline B15; must denote moral/glory-likeness, never visual depiction, given taṣwīr sensitivities.
2 Corinthians 4:4Satan blinding unbelieving mindsSatanEchoes the blinding motif: Isaiah 6:9-10; Deuteronomy 29:4Direct parallel: Romans 11:7-10, quoting Isaiah 29:10 and Deuteronomy 29:4/Psalm 69:22-23 on hardened mindsMedium. See baseline B19; every occurrence needs the clarifying note that “god of this age” is ironic/descriptive of Satan, not a concession of a rival deity.
2 Corinthians 4:6Light shining out of darknessGod, ChristDirect allusion: Genesis 1:3 (“Let there be light”)Thematic parallel: Romans 4:17 (God who calls into existence things that do not exist)High. Directly undergirds the New Creation doctrine (baseline B2, Critical): the same creative Word that spoke light into the original creation now shines “in our hearts” — a re-creation, not a moral touch-up.
2 Corinthians 4:13”I believed, and so I spoke”The Psalmist, PaulDirect quotation: Psalm 116:10 (LXX/Van Dyck numbering: Psalm 115:1)Thematic parallel: Romans 10:9-10 (believing with the heart, confessing with the mouth)Medium. Note the LXX/MT Psalm-numbering divergence; confirm which numbering the destination Arabic Bible edition (Van Dyck follows MT numbering) uses before citing, to avoid a misdirected cross-reference.
2 Corinthians 5:1Heavenly house not made with handsBelieversEchoes tabernacle/temple-building imagery: Exodus 25; contrasted with “handmade” (cf. Mark 14:58; Acts 7:48)Thematic parallel: Romans 8:18-25 (creation’s groaning, awaiting the redemption of the body)Medium. No major doctrinal collision; note the deliberate contrast with any humanly-constructed sacred structure.
2 Corinthians 5:14-15 (core)Christ’s substitutionary, representative deathChristTypological background: Passover lamb (Exodus 12:1-13); Suffering Servant substitution (Isaiah 53:4-6)Direct doctrinal parallel: Romans 5:6-8, 15-19 (one man’s act determining the destiny of many)Critical. Central collision point with Quran 6:164’s denial of vicarious sin-bearing; requires full apologetic scaffolding per baseline “salvation” note.
2 Corinthians 5:17 (core)New creationBelievers, “in Christ”Direct allusion: Isaiah 43:18-19 (“former things… a new thing”); Isaiah 65:17 (new heavens and new earth)Direct parallel: Romans 6:4 (walk in newness of life); conceptually anticipates Galatians 6:15 and Revelation 21:5Critical. See baseline B2; Isaiah’s “new thing” prophecy is the OT root of this doctrine and should be cited when teaching this passage.
2 Corinthians 5:19 (core)Non-imputation of sinGod, humanityConceptual flip-side of Genesis 15:6 (crediting of righteousness)Direct doctrinal parallel: Romans 4:3-8 (quoting Genesis 15:6); shares the ح-س-ب accounting root with البر المحسوبCritical. Rendering-consistency rule: use the same ح-س-ب root family as Romans’ imputed_righteousness entry; see Part C.
2 Corinthians 5:21 (core)Christ made sin for us; we become the righteousness of GodChristTypological fulfillment: Isaiah 53:6,9-12 (Suffering Servant bears iniquity); Levitical sin offering (Leviticus 4; Leviticus 16, Day of Atonement scapegoat)Direct doctrinal parallel: Romans 3:25 (propitiation); Romans 8:3 (“condemned sin in the flesh”)Critical. The single sharpest collision point with Quran 6:164 in the whole curriculum; see baseline B1/B2 and Part C.
2 Corinthians 6:2”In a favorable time… a day of salvation”The Servant of the Lord (typologically Christ)Direct quotation: Isaiah 49:8Direct lexical parallel: reuses Romans’ Critical الخلاص (salvation) term exactlyHigh. Must retain الخلاص’s full baseline weight (once-for-all, assured deliverance), not a “day” limited to a future pending verdict.
2 Corinthians 6:14Do not be unequally yokedBelieversBackground echo: Deuteronomy 22:10 (mixed plowing prohibition); Leviticus 19:19No direct Romans lexical parallel; thematic parallel: Romans 12:2 (“do not be conformed to this world”)High. Handle with pastoral sensitivity given family/marriage/business social weight; not Sufi-style withdrawal (see baseline “separation_unto_gods_service”).
2 Corinthians 6:16-18God’s indwelling presence; call to separation; adoption as sons and daughtersGod, believersComposite direct quotation: Leviticus 26:11-12/Ezekiel 37:27 (“I will make my dwelling… my people”); Isaiah 52:11 (“Go out from their midst…”); Ezekiel 20:34,41 (“I will welcome you”); 2 Samuel 7:14/Isaiah 43:6 (“a father to you… sons and daughters”)Direct doctrinal parallel: Romans 8:14-17 (Spirit of adoption, “Abba, Father”); Romans 9:26, also quoting Hosea 1:10 on being called “sons of the living God”Critical. Concentrates temple (B21), separation (High), father (Critical), and adoption (Critical) doctrines in one composite quotation; each component OT source must be rendered per its own established Arabic Bible tradition.
2 Corinthians 7:1Perfecting holiness in view of God’s promisesBelieversRefers back to the 6:16-18 composite promiseThematic parallel: Romans 6:19, 22 (sanctification)Medium. See baseline التقديس (High); moral, not ritual, purification.
2 Corinthians 8:9Christ’s voluntary poverty for our richesChristTypological echo: Isaiah 53:2-3 (the Servant’s unimpressive, humbled form)No direct Romans OT-quotation parallel; NT-NT parallel: Philippians 2:6-8Medium. Must be taught alongside the baseline’s Critical Incarnation doctrine, not as a stand-alone economic maxim.
2 Corinthians 8:15Manna gathered equally, “no one had too much or too little”Israel in the wilderness, MosesDirect quotation: Exodus 16:18No direct Romans parallelMedium. Typological pattern: God’s wilderness provision for Israel models the church’s mutual, grace-based provision for one another; do not present as a call to enforced economic equality.
2 Corinthians 9:7Cheerful, uncompelled givingBelieversBackground echo: Deuteronomy 15:10 (generous, ungrudging giving)No direct Romans parallelLow. No collision; a genuine shared virtue with Islamic generosity ethics (zakāh/ṣadaqah), though the theological ground (grace, not obligation) differs and should be noted.
2 Corinthians 9:9”He has given to the poor; his righteousness endures forever”The generous/righteous personDirect quotation: Psalm 112:9Direct lexical parallel: reuses Romans’ Critical البر (righteousness) termMedium-High. Must be read as righteousness’s practical fruit flowing from an already-credited status (per 5:21), not righteousness earned by the act of giving — see baseline warning on البر’s works-checklist collision risk.
2 Corinthians 10:17”Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord”Prophetic voice (typologically applied to believers)Direct quotation: Jeremiah 9:24NT-NT parallel: also quoted at 1 Corinthians 1:31 (same Corinthian correspondence)High. See baseline B28; render consistently with any other curriculum quoting Jeremiah 9:24, and frame as a deliberate reversal of Arab mufākharah (tribal competitive boasting).
2 Corinthians 11:2Godly jealousy for a pure, betrothed churchPaul, the Corinthian church, Christ (bridegroom)Background marriage-covenant imagery: Hosea 2:19-20; Jeremiah 2:2; Ezekiel 16; Isaiah 54:5No direct Romans parallel; thematically anticipates Ephesians 5:25-27Medium. Anchor to bridegroom-bride betrothal imagery specifically; see baseline B29.
2 Corinthians 11:3The serpent’s deception of EveSerpent, Eve, Adam (implicit)Direct allusion: Genesis 3:1-13No direct Romans OT-quotation parallel; thematic parallel: Romans 5:12-14 (Adam typology, though there applied to sin’s entry, not deception method)Medium. Genesis 3 is a shared narrative reference point (also present, differently framed, in the Quranic Adam account); typological point here is false teachers as agents of the same original deceptive strategy.
2 Corinthians 11:14Satan disguised as an angel of lightSatanNo direct OT quotation; broader Jewish apocalyptic angelology backgroundNo direct Romans parallelMedium. See baseline B32; Quranic angelology (Iblīs as jinn, not fallen angel) differs in taxonomy from this passage’s picture.
2 Corinthians 12:2-4Paul’s vision of paradise / the third heavenPaulEchoes Jewish apocalyptic cosmology (cf. 1 Kings 8:27; Ezekiel 1; Isaiah 6) and παράδεισος as LXX rendering of Eden (Genesis 2:8-15)No direct Romans parallelMedium-High. Typological resonance: restored access to Eden’s paradise through Christ, reversing Genesis 3’s expulsion — see baseline B33 for الفردوس vs الجنة distinction.
2 Corinthians 12:7Thorn in the flesh; messenger of SatanPaul, SatanPossible echo: Numbers 33:55 (“thorns in your sides”); typological parallel: Job’s affliction permitted by God under Satan’s limited agency (Job 1:6-12; 2:1-7)Thematic parallel: Romans 8:26 (the Spirit helps us in our weakness)Low-Medium. Job typology (righteous sufferer, divinely bounded testing) is a strong, safe teaching bridge; see baseline B34 on the shared رسول root.
2 Corinthians 12:9-10Power made perfect in weaknessChrist, PaulConceptual echo: Isaiah 40:29-31 (strength renewed for the weak); Judges 7 (Gideon’s reduced army); 1 Samuel 17 (David vs. Goliath)Direct doctrinal parallel: Romans 8:26; 1 Corinthians 1:27 (“God chose what is weak”)High. See baseline B35; must be taught as a deliberate paradox (boasting IN weakness), not smoothed into “God gives strength” alone.
2 Corinthians 13:1Testimony of two or three witnessesChurch discipline procedureDirect quotation: Deuteronomy 19:15No direct Romans parallelMedium. Reuses the Mosaic-law domain; ensure الناموس-adjacent vocabulary is used if referencing “the Law,” never الشريعة (baseline Critical rule).
2 Corinthians 13:14Trinitarian benedictionFather, Son, Holy SpiritEchoes the threefold structure of the Aaronic priestly blessing (Numbers 6:24-26)Direct doctrinal parallel: no verbatim Romans equivalent, but shares every Critical baseline term used throughout Romans (الرب، يسوع، المسيح، الله، الروح القدس) plus النعمة (High) and the new المحبة term; structurally parallel to Matthew 28:19Critical. See baseline B38; translate with the same rigor as the baptismal formula — preserve all three Persons and their distinct actions.

PART B: Messianic References and Typological Patterns

B1. Moses as Type of the Old Covenant Ministry (2 Corinthians 3:7-18)

Moses’s veiled, fading glory (Exodus 34:29-35) typifies the old covenant’s real but temporary and ultimately insufficient glory. Christ’s unveiled, permanent glory (2 Corinthians 3:18) is the fulfillment this type anticipates. Translation implication: Moses (موسى) is a positively-regarded shared Quranic prophet; the typological direction — his ministry pointing forward to, and surpassed by, a greater one — must be taught explicitly, since Islamic prophetology has no analogous “succession that surpasses in glory while fulfilling rather than replacing” category (see naskh discussion, Part C).

B2. Adam/Eve Typology (2 Corinthians 5:17; 11:3)

2 Corinthians 5:17’s “new creation” implicitly invokes the old-Adam/new-humanity contrast fully developed in Romans 5:12-21 and 1 Corinthians 15:22,45. 2 Corinthians 11:3’s serpent-deceived-Eve reference frames the Corinthian church’s vulnerability to false teachers as a recurrence of the same primordial deception, with the church cast, typologically, in Eve’s position and Christ as the true, faithful bridegroom (cf. 11:2).

B3. The Passover Lamb and Suffering Servant (2 Corinthians 5:14-15, 21)

Christ’s substitutionary death (“one died for all,” “made him to be sin”) draws on two OT typological streams: the Passover lamb’s substitutionary blood (Exodus 12) and the Suffering Servant’s vicarious sin-bearing (Isaiah 53:4-6, 9-12), further formalized in Levitical sin-offering and Day-of-Atonement scapegoat imagery (Leviticus 4; 16). This is the letter’s single highest-density messianic/typological convergence and its single highest doctrinal-risk point (Quran 6:164).

B4. Manna and Provision (2 Corinthians 8:15)

The wilderness manna account (Exodus 16) — provided sufficiently for each household regardless of gathering-effort — typifies the principle of grace-based mutual sufficiency Paul commends for the Jerusalem collection: not an economic leveling by law, but a grace-shaped pattern of care echoing God’s own provision.

B5. Tabernacle/Temple Indwelling (2 Corinthians 5:1; 6:16)

Both the “house not made with hands” (5:1) and “temple of the living God” (6:16) draw on the tabernacle/temple as the place of God’s manifest presence (Exodus 25; Leviticus 26:11-12; Ezekiel 37:27), reapplied first to the believer’s future resurrection body and second to the corporate/individual believer as God’s present dwelling. Translation implication: given regional veneration of literal sacred sites, both images must be taught as deliberately non-architectural.

B6. Job as Type of the Divinely-Bounded Sufferer (2 Corinthians 12:7)

Paul’s “thorn… messenger of Satan,” permitted but limited by God’s sovereign purpose, echoes Job’s affliction (Job 1-2), where Satan acts only within boundaries God sets, and the suffering serves a purpose beyond the sufferer’s immediate comprehension. This is a strong, low-risk teaching bridge, since Job (أيوب, Ayyūb) is also a positively regarded, patient-endurance figure in Islamic tradition — though the specific theology of God’s purpose in Paul’s case (producing humility amid revelation, 12:7) should be drawn out explicitly rather than assumed shared.

B7. Priestly Benediction Pattern (2 Corinthians 13:14)

The threefold structure of Paul’s closing benediction echoes the Aaronic threefold blessing (Numbers 6:24-26), now filled with explicitly Trinitarian content — each of the three “blessings” naming a distinct divine Person and action.


PART C: Rendering-Consistency Rules for Shared Quotations and Parallel Terms

  1. Genesis 15:6 / imputed righteousness family (2 Corinthians 5:19,21; Romans 4:3-8). No verbatim OT quotation of Genesis 15:6 occurs in 2 Corinthians, but 5:19’s non-imputation of sin and 5:21’s “made him sin… we become the righteousness of God” are the doctrinal mirror-image of Romans 4’s imputed-righteousness argument. Both must use the identical ح-س-ب (crediting/reckoning) root already fixed in the baseline’s البر المحسوب. Do not introduce a new root or a synonym for “credited” in 2 Corinthians documents; the shared root is what allows a learner moving between the two curricula to recognize the doctrinal connection.

  2. Jeremiah 31:31-34 (New Covenant promise), echoed at 2 Corinthians 3:3,6 and cross-referenced from Romans 2:15; 7:6; 8:2. Where this passage is quoted or closely paraphrased in any future Jeremiah-based curriculum, and wherever it is alluded to here, use العهد الجديد (baseline-extension term, Critical) consistently, and always accompany it with the naskh-correction note from Part D below.

  3. Isaiah 49:8 (2 Corinthians 6:2) and the baseline’s الخلاص (salvation, Critical). “Day of salvation” must use الخلاص exactly, never a softer alternative like نجاة (rescue) or فوز (triumph/winning), preserving lexical identity with every other salvation-doctrine occurrence across both curricula.

  4. Jeremiah 9:24 (2 Corinthians 10:17), also quoted at 1 Corinthians 1:31. If a 1 Corinthians language package exists or is later produced for Arabic, the Arabic rendering of this quotation must be verified identical across both curricula documents. Recommended standard rendering: “فَمَنِ افْتَخَرَ فَلْيَفْتَخِرْ بِالرَّبِّ” (following Van Dyck), reusing باseline الرب (Critical) exactly.

  5. Exodus 34:29-35 veil narrative (2 Corinthians 3:7-18). Every occurrence of “veil” in this narrative complex must use غطاء, never برقع or حجاب, per baseline glossary entry B14 — apply this rule uniformly across all three verses (3:13, 3:14, 3:16) even though English versions render the underlying Greek with different surrounding phrases.

  6. 2 Samuel 7:14 / adoption language (2 Corinthians 6:18), cross-referenced from Romans 8:15-17; 9:4. “Sons and daughters” here must use the baseline’s established التبني framework’s full-inheritance sense even though the word التبني itself does not appear in this specific verse; the surrounding teaching must make clear this is the same full-filial-status doctrine as Romans 8, not a separate or lesser category.

  7. Proper names. All OT proper names cited in this document (Moses = موسى, David = داود [baseline], Adam = آدم, Eve = حواء, Job = أيوب, Jeremiah = إرميا, Isaiah = إشعياء [baseline]) must use the established Van Dyck/NAV Arabic Bible forms exactly, matching the baseline’s existing name conventions (see 12_ai_translation_requirements.md transliteration standards) — never a Quranic-form alternative where one differs (e.g., Job’s Quranic form أيوب happens to match the Christian form; no substitution needed there, but always verify case by case).

  8. Citation format. All Scripture cross-references embedded in Phase 2 teaching notes must use the Arabic Bible citation convention already fixed for Romans (book name per Van Dyck abbreviation + Hindu-Arabic numerals for chapter:verse). The Arabic book-name form for this curriculum is ٢ كورنثوس; do not use alternate abbreviations (e.g., كو٢) inconsistently within the same document set.


PART D: Doctrinal Correction Notes Required at Point of Use

  • Naskh/abrogation risk (applies to rows: 1:20; 3:3; 3:6; 3:7-11). Every “old covenant superseded by new covenant” statement in this letter must be actively taught as fulfillment of a promise, not as an instance of a general pattern of revelation abrogating revelation — because that general pattern, once conceded, is precisely the logic mainstream Islamic doctrine uses to claim the Quran supersedes the Injīl. State explicitly, at first occurrence in any Phase 2 document: “the New Covenant is not one link in an open chain of replacements; Paul teaches it is God’s own promised and final fulfillment (2 Corinthians 3:11), already anticipated by Jeremiah 31 centuries earlier.”
  • Substitutionary atonement risk (applies to rows: 5:14-15; 5:21; 6:16-18 (temple/sonship not directly but adjacently); 8:9). Every occurrence of vicarious/representative death language must carry the reminder that this directly contradicts Quran 6:164’s “no bearer of burdens shall bear another’s burden” and must never be softened to avoid the collision — the collision is the theological point requiring careful, not evasive, treatment.
  • Israel/contemporary-politics risk (applies to rows: 3:13-14; 3:16). Any teaching on the veil over Israel’s reading of the old covenant must be framed as a first-century redemptive-historical argument (paralleling Romans 9-11), not as commentary on the modern Israeli-Palestinian situation.

This document extends, and must not contradict, 07_semantic_analysis.md, 08_core_glossary.md, and the Romans baseline. All rendering-consistency rules in Part C are binding for Phase 2 processing of any segment containing the listed OT quotations.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words