Cross-Reference Analysis
Cross-Reference and Theme Analysis — 2 Peter
Purpose and Method
This document maps every Old Testament quotation and allusion, every messianic reference and typological pattern, and every substantive parallel to the Romans curriculum already deployed in Dogri, across all three chapters of 2 Peter. It exists to (a) surface doctrinal load hidden inside allusions that a segment-by-segment translation pass could miss, and (b) lock down rendering-consistency rules wherever 2 Peter shares vocabulary, quotations, or doctrine with Romans, so that a Dogri-speaking learner moving between the two curricula encounters one coherent theological vocabulary, not two.
2 Peter quotes the Old Testament far less densely than Romans (which is saturated with direct LXX-style citation), and instead works mostly by allusion, echo, and named historical example (Noah, Lot, Balaam). Every such case is treated here as a “connection” requiring the same translation-sensitivity discipline as a direct quotation, per the PRD’s full-book-coverage mandate.
1. OT Quotations and Allusions — Chapter 1
| 2 Peter Passage | Theme | Related Person(s) | OT/NT Connection | Translation Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Peter 1:1 | Deity of Christ; Righteousness by faith, not lineage/merit | Jesus Christ | NT parallel: Titus 2:13 (identical “God and Savior” construction); OT background: Isaiah 43:11 (“I am the LORD, and besides me there is no savior”) | Critical. The Greek grammar makes “God” and “Savior” both refer to Jesus Christ. The Dogri rendering must preserve this identification (परमेश्वर … उद्धारकर्ता — both titles applied to the one referent यीशु मसीह) and not be restructured into two separate figures. |
| 2 Peter 1:17 | Sonship of Christ; Transfiguration | Jesus Christ; God the Father | OT background: Psalm 2:7 (“You are my Son; today I have begotten you”); Isaiah 42:1 (“my chosen one, in whom my soul delights”); NT parallel: the Transfiguration accounts themselves (Matthew 17:5, Mark 9:7, Luke 9:35) and the Baptism voice (Matthew 3:17, Mark 1:11, Luke 3:22) | Critical. The Father’s voice combines royal-messianic (Psalm 2) and Servant (Isaiah 42) language. Must be rendered as unique, eternal Sonship (baseline परमेश्वर दा पुत्तर), never as one honored figure among several, and never softened toward an avatar-descent framing. |
| 2 Peter 1:16-18 | Transfiguration typology; Incarnation background | Jesus, Peter, James, John (implicit); Moses, Elijah (implicit — not named in 2 Peter’s text but present in the event being recounted) | OT typology: Exodus 24:15-18 and Exodus 34:29-35 (Moses, glory-cloud, shining face on Sinai); 1 Kings 19:8-18 (Elijah at Horeb) — both patterns of divine self-disclosure on a “holy mountain” | High. “Holy mountain” (पवित्तर पहाड़) must be understood as a one-time, historically located event-site (the Mount of Transfiguration), not extended by resonance to regional shrine-mountain geography (Trikuta hills/Vaishno Devi). |
| 2 Peter 1:19 | Certainty of Christ’s Return; Messianic Promise | Christ (the “morning star”) | OT: Numbers 24:17 (“a star shall come out of Jacob” — Balaam’s own oracle, ironic given ch. 2’s later naming of Balaam); 2 Samuel 23:4 (dawn imagery for the Davidic king); Malachi 4:2 (“the sun of righteousness shall rise”); NT: Revelation 22:16 (Jesus: “I am… the bright morning star”); Luke 1:78 | High. The “morning star” image is messianic and must not be read through any astrological-prediction frame (see baseline’s rejection of ज्योतषी for “prophet”); it names Christ himself, not a celestial omen. |
| 2 Peter 1:19 | Inspiration/Reliability of Scripture | — | OT echo: Psalm 119:105 (“Your word is a lamp to my feet”) | Low. Natural continuation of the lamp-metaphor; no significant cultural collision if kept as a guidance image. |
| 2 Peter 1:20-21 | Inspiration of Scripture | The prophets (unnamed collectively) | NT parallel: Romans 15:4 (“whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction”); 2 Timothy 3:16 (“All Scripture is breathed out by God”) | Critical. Establishes the doctrine of dual authorship (truly human, truly divine) that governs how “carried along by the Holy Spirit” must be taught — see Section 4 below for the mandatory distinction from local oracular-possession practice. |
2. OT Quotations and Allusions — Chapter 2
| 2 Peter Passage | Theme | Related Person(s) | OT/NT Connection | Translation Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Peter 2:1 | False Teachers and Their Judgment | — | OT background: Deuteronomy 13:1-5 and Deuteronomy 18:20-22 (test of true vs. false prophet); Jeremiah 23:16-32; Ezekiel 13 (false prophets denounced) | Medium. Establishes that false-teaching is an old, recognized covenant-community danger, not a uniquely Christian anxiety. |
| 2 Peter 2:4 | Judgment on false teachers, a fortiori argument | The angels who sinned | OT: Genesis 6:1-4 (“the sons of God… Nephilim”); NT parallel: Jude 1:6 (angels “kept in eternal chains”) | High. “Tartarus” (नरक) must be taught as a place/state of confinement awaiting final judgment, explicitly distinguished from the popular regional concept of narak as a temporary purgatorial stage prior to continued rebirth (per texts such as the Garuda Purana). |
| 2 Peter 2:5 | Judgment precedent #1; typology of rescue through judgment | Noah | OT: Genesis 6:5-8:22 (the Flood narrative); NT parallel: Hebrews 11:7 (Noah’s faith); 1 Peter 3:20 (Noah as a type connected to baptism — a sibling epistle’s usage, noted for future cross-curriculum awareness, not this curriculum’s direct scope) | Medium-High. Reuses ch.3’s “flood” vocabulary (जलघाल़); Noah functions here as the pattern of God rescuing the righteous while judging “the world of the ungodly” — the same pattern later applied cosmically in ch. 3. |
| 2 Peter 2:6 | Judgment precedent #2 | Sodom and Gomorrah | OT: Genesis 19:1-29; Genesis 18:20-21; Deuteronomy 29:23; Isaiah 1:9; NT parallel: Jude 1:7; Luke 17:28-29 (Jesus references “the days of Lot”) | Low-Medium. Proper names सदोम/गमोरा transliterated; historical-judgment example, low syncretism risk. |
| 2 Peter 2:7-8 | Judgment precedent #2, continued; rescue of the righteous | Lot | OT: Genesis 19:1, 15-16, 29 | Low. धरमी लूत (righteous Lot) reuses baseline धरमी root; straightforward. |
| 2 Peter 2:11 | Angelic restraint in judgment-speech | Angels (unnamed); implicit reference to a dispute over Moses’ body | NT parallel: Jude 1:9 (Michael’s dispute with the devil over Moses’ body, itself drawing on Zechariah 3:1-2 and extrabiblical tradition) | Low. 2 Peter itself does not name the incident; flag only if a future Jude curriculum requires alignment. |
| 2 Peter 2:15-16 | Judgment precedent #3; false-teacher archetype | Balaam (son of Beor/Bosor) | OT: Numbers 22:1-35 (Balaam and Balak); Numbers 22:21-35 (the donkey speaks); Numbers 31:8, 16; Deuteronomy 23:4-5; Joshua 24:9-10; Nehemiah 13:2; Micah 6:5; NT parallel: Jude 1:11; Revelation 2:14 | High. Balaam is named as the paradigm of a prophet corrupted by love of gain — the same category the letter applies to the false teachers of Duggar-region relevance (see Section 4, guru caution). Requires an explanatory background note, since OT narrative literacy in the target audience is assumed low. |
| 2 Peter 2:22 | Apostasy’s self-destructiveness | — | OT direct quotation: Proverbs 26:11 (“Like a dog that returns to his vomit is a fool who repeats his folly”); the paired “sow… mire” saying is a common ancient proverb NOT found in the OT canon — flagged so it is not mistakenly treated as Scripture quotation | Medium. Only the dog/vomit half is a canonical OT quotation; the sow/mire half is proverbial folk-wisdom Peter cites for illustrative force. Dogri rendering (कहावत, “proverb”) should not imply both halves carry equal scriptural authority. |
3. OT Quotations and Allusions — Chapter 3
| 2 Peter Passage | Theme | Related Person(s) | OT/NT Connection | Translation Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Peter 3:4 | Scoffers denying Christ’s Return | Scoffers (unnamed) | OT echo: Jeremiah 17:15; Ezekiel 12:22, 27 (“every vision comes to nothing”); Malachi 2:17; Psalm 10:4, 11, 13 (the wicked say God will not act) | Medium. Establishes that denial of divine intervention/judgment is an old scriptural pattern, not a modern skeptic’s original insight. |
| 2 Peter 3:5 | Creation by God’s word | — | OT: Genesis 1:1-9; Psalm 33:6, 9; Psalm 148:5 | Low-Medium. रचना/परमेश्वर दे बोल कन्नै — straightforward creation-by-word doctrine. |
| 2 Peter 3:6 | Judgment precedent recap (flood) | Noah (implicit, unnamed here) | OT: Genesis 7:11-8:14 | Medium-High (reused from ch. 2). Same जलघाल़/नाश vocabulary; the flood is cited as proof God has already once judged the world by water — the pattern for the coming judgment by fire. |
| 2 Peter 3:7 | Day of the Lord; cosmic judgment by fire | — | OT: Isaiah 34:4; Zephaniah 1:18; Malachi 4:1; Deuteronomy 32:22; Nahum 1:5-6; NT parallel: 2 Thessalonians 1:7-8 | High. Fire-judgment imagery must be kept within a linear, one-time-event framework — see the pralaya caution in Section 5. |
| 2 Peter 3:8 | Patience of God’s Timing | — | OT direct quotation: Psalm 90:4 (“For a thousand years in your sight are but as yesterday… or as a watch in the night”) | High. This is the clearest direct OT quotation in the letter. Must be rendered and taught as evidence of God’s transcendence of human time serving a purposeful, linear plan — never as support for the vast cyclical yuga/kalpa time-scales of Hindu cosmology. |
| 2 Peter 3:9 | Patience of God’s Timing; universal scope of mercy | — | OT echo: Ezekiel 18:23; Ezekiel 33:11 (“I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked… turn back and live”); NT parallel: Romans 2:4; 1 Timothy 2:4 | Critical. See Section 4 (Romans parallels) below — this is one of the tightest doctrinal links between 2 Peter and the existing Romans curriculum. |
| 2 Peter 3:10 | Day of the Lord | — | OT background: the full prophetic “Day of the LORD” tradition — Joel 2:1; Amos 5:18-20; Zephaniah 1:14-18; Isaiah 13:6, 9; Malachi 4:1, 5; NT parallel: Matthew 24:43; Luke 12:39; 1 Thessalonians 5:2; Revelation 3:3; 16:15 | Critical. प्रभु दा दिन must connect to this entire prophetic tradition as one unified, climactic, historical event — not a recurring seasonal or cyclical “day.” |
| 2 Peter 3:13 | New heavens and new earth | — | OT direct allusion: Isaiah 65:17 and Isaiah 66:22 (“For behold, I create new heavens and a new earth”); NT parallel: Revelation 21:1, 27 (same imagery, John’s vision) | Critical. नमां अकाश ते नमीं धरती is textually dependent on Isaiah’s promise and must be rendered identically to how any future Isaiah or Revelation curriculum would render these verses — see rendering-consistency rules below. |
| 2 Peter 3:15-16 | Canon-consciousness; direct link to the Romans curriculum | Paul (named explicitly as “our beloved brother”) | NT: the entire Pauline corpus, which includes Romans; 2 Peter 3:16 explicitly places Paul’s letters alongside “the other Scriptures” (τὰς γραφάς) | Critical. This is the single most direct textual bridge between this curriculum and the Romans curriculum already deployed in Dogri: 2 Peter 3:15-16 is about letters like Romans. See Section 4. |
| 2 Peter 3:18 | Growing in grace and knowledge; closing doxology | — | NT parallel: Romans 11:33-36 (closing doxology pattern); 2 Corinthians 13:11 | Critical. The letter’s final verse; must match the Romans package’s precedent for verbatim cross-document consistency on thesis-adjacent verses. |
4. Parallels to the Romans Curriculum (Dogri)
2 Peter and Romans share a doctrinal vocabulary at the deepest level (grace, righteousness, calling/election, the Lordship and Sonship of Christ) and, in 2 Peter 3:15-16, an explicit literary self-reference to letters like Romans. The table below locks in required consistency.
| 2 Peter Passage | Shared Theme/Term | Romans Passage(s) | Dogri Rendering-Consistency Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Peter 1:1 | Righteousness of God/Christ; Deity of Christ | Romans 1:17; 3:21-22; 9:5 | धरमीपन reused exactly, no deviation. “Our God and Savior” mirrors Romans 9:5’s “God over all” in asserting Christ’s full deity — teach both texts as a matched pair. |
| 2 Peter 1:2 | Grace and peace (greeting formula) | Romans 1:7 | बिना कमाई दित्ती दया and शान्ति reused exactly — the greeting is structurally identical across both letters. |
| 2 Peter 1:3, 1:16 | Power of God | Romans 1:16 | सामर्थ reused exactly; NEVER शक्ति in either curriculum. |
| 2 Peter 1:5 | Faith | Romans 1:17; 3:22-28 | भरोसा reused exactly. |
| 2 Peter 1:10 | Calling and election | Romans 8:28-30; 9:11-12; 11:29 | सद्द and परमेश्वर दी चोन reused exactly. This is a CRITICAL cross-curriculum consistency point per the theological-consistency rules in 12_ai_translation_requirements.md; any learner who has studied Romans 8:28-30 must recognize identical vocabulary in 2 Peter 1:10. |
| 2 Peter 1:11 | Kingdom | Romans 14:17 | परमेश्वर दा राज्य reused (adapted “मसीह दा राज्य” for the specific phrase “eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior”); same doctrinal category, non-dynastic reign. |
| 2 Peter 1:17 | Sonship/deity of Christ | Romans 1:3-4; 8:3; 8:29; 9:5 | परमेश्वर दा पुत्तर reused exactly. Both curricula must guard against अवतार substitution with equal strictness — this is not a 2 Peter-only risk. |
| 2 Peter 2:19 | Bondage vs. freedom; slavery to corruption/sin | Romans 6:16-22; 8:21 | New term बिगाड़ दे गुलाम (slaves of corruption) should echo Romans’ existing slavery-to-sin imagery in register and tone, even though it is a new compound; both must read as the same moral-bondage category. |
| 2 Peter 3:6-7 | Universal judgment | Romans 1:18-3:20; 2:5-6 | Reinforces the Romans doctrine registry’s “Universal Human Accountability” (Critical/High) — no softening of judgment-scope in either book. |
| 2 Peter 3:9 | God’s patience leading to repentance | Romans 2:4 (“God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance”); Romans 9:22 (“bearing with much patience the vessels of wrath”) | CRITICAL, direct verbal overlap. Both books use the same underlying concept of God’s μακροθυμία (patience/longsuffering) purposefully delaying judgment for the sake of repentance (μετάνοια). Dogri renderings परमेश्वर दा सहनशीलता and मन फिराना, once fixed for 2 Peter, MUST be checked against and (if the Romans package is ever revised) harmonized with any Romans 2:4/9:22 rendering, so the doctrine of “Patience of God’s Timing” reads as one unified biblical teaching, not two unrelated ideas. |
| 2 Peter 3:13 | Cosmic renewal | Romans 8:19-23 (creation’s groaning, longing for the freedom of the glory of the children of God) | धरमीपन reused. Both passages present linear, historical, one-time cosmic renewal — never a cyclical process. Teach these two texts together as complementary witnesses to the same future hope. |
| 2 Peter 3:15-16 | Canon and Scripture’s authority; explicit reference to Pauline letters | The entirety of Romans, as one of “all his [Paul’s] letters” | पवित्तर शास्तर (the new Critical-risk term fixed for 2 Peter) must extend, without adjustment, to cover Romans’s own status as inspired Pauline Scripture. Note for curriculum designers: 2 Peter 3:15-16 can be taught as the New Testament’s own explanation for why Romans itself carries scriptural authority — a valuable integrative teaching point across the two curricula. |
| 2 Peter 3:18 | Grace (closing exhortation) | Romans 11:5-6; 3:24 | बिना कमाई दित्ती दया reused exactly. Thesis-adjacent-verse consistency required, matching the priority already given to Romans 1:16-17, 8:28, and 10:9-10 in 12_ai_translation_requirements.md. |
| 2 Peter 3:10 (Day of the Lord) | Prophetic “Day of the LORD” tradition | Romans 10:13 (quoting Joel 2:32, “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved” — itself embedded in Joel’s Day-of-the-LORD oracle, Joel 2:28-32) | Medium-High, thematic (not verbal) link. Romans 10:13 and 2 Peter 3:10 both draw on the same OT prophetic Day-of-the-LORD complex (Joel), from opposite angles — salvation offered before the Day, judgment executed on the Day. Translator note: teach as two movements of a single biblical storyline, not disconnected topics. |
5. Messianic References and Typology (Full-Book Summary)
| Type/Reference | 2 Peter Passage | OT Root | Fulfillment Pattern | Translation Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beloved Son declared by the Father’s voice | 2 Peter 1:17 | Psalm 2:7; Isaiah 42:1 | Fulfilled uniquely and finally in Christ, confirmed by eyewitness testimony | Critical — see Section 1 above. |
| Morning star | 2 Peter 1:19 | Numbers 24:17; Malachi 4:2 | Fulfilled in Christ per Revelation 22:16’s self-identification | High — must remain a title for Christ, not an astrological reading. |
| ”Our God and Savior” | 2 Peter 1:1 | Isaiah 43:11 | Applied directly and grammatically to Jesus, asserting full deity | Critical — see Deity of Christ / Savior entries in 08_core_glossary.md. |
| Sinai/Horoz theophany pattern → Transfiguration | 2 Peter 1:16-18 | Exodus 24:15-18; Exodus 34:29-35; 1 Kings 19:8-18 | The pattern of God’s glory disclosed on a holy mountain, fulfilled and surpassed in Christ’s own unveiled majesty | High — see holy-mountain note above; must not extend by resonance to regional pilgrimage-mountain sanctity. |
| Noah rescued through the Flood | 2 Peter 2:5; 3:6 | Genesis 6-8 | Type of God’s pattern: judgment on the ungodly world, rescue of the righteous — applied cosmically in ch. 3 to the coming judgment by fire | Medium-High — reinforce as historical, not cyclical/pralaya-adjacent. |
| Lot rescued from Sodom | 2 Peter 2:7-9 | Genesis 19 | Same rescue-through-judgment pattern as Noah, on a smaller scale | Low-Medium. |
| Balaam, the prophet-for-hire | 2 Peter 2:15-16 | Numbers 22-24 | Negative type: prophetic/teaching office corrupted by love of gain — directly informs the letter’s portrait of false teachers | High — reinforces the Section-3 caution (glossary Doctrine 3) against using गुरू even negatively for false teachers, since Balaam himself was a legitimate prophetic office-holder before his corruption; the warning is about corruption of a real office, not illegitimacy of “teacher” as a category. |
| Flood (water) → Day of the Lord (fire) | 2 Peter 3:5-7 | Genesis 6-8; Isaiah 34:4; Zephaniah 1:18 | Explicit typological pairing made by the text itself: as God once judged by water, he will judge by fire — establishing a two-stage historical (not cyclical) pattern | Critical — this is the letter’s own typological argument and must be preserved as historical succession, not assimilated to a repeating cosmic-dissolution (pralaya) pattern. |
| New heavens and new earth | 2 Peter 3:13 | Isaiah 65:17; 66:22 | Future, final, permanent fulfillment; echoed again in Revelation 21:1 | Critical — see Section 3 and the Day-of-the-Lord doctrine note in 08_core_glossary.md. |
6. Rendering-Consistency Rules for Shared Quotations and Terms
-
All baseline-fixed terms are non-negotiable. Wherever a 2 Peter passage uses a term already fixed in the Romans
translation_memory.json(परमेश्वर, प्रभु, यीशु, मसीह, पिता, परमेश्वर दा पुत्तर, पवित्तर आत्मा, बिना कमाई दित्ती दया, धरमीपन, भरोसा, सद्द, परमेश्वर दी चोन, परमेश्वर दा राज्य, सामर्थ, महिमा, भविष्यवाणी, नबी, पाप, शान्ति, उद्धार, भेजेआ होया, पवित्तर, पवित्तर लोक), use it exactly, with zero deviation, per the priority-order rule already established in12_ai_translation_requirements.md. -
New 2 Peter-specific terms must be locked at first use and never re-negotiated within the book. पवित्तर शास्तर, मसीह दा फिर औना, प्रभु दा दिन, परमेश्वर दा दैविक सुभा, पूरी पछान, परमेश्वर दा आदर करदा जीवन, परमेश्वर दा सहनशीलता, मन फिराना, and नमां अकाश ते नमीं धरती must appear identically at every occurrence across chapters 1-3, and must be added to
translation_memory.jsonbefore Phase 2 begins (per08_core_glossary.md§“New Terms Requiring Translation Memory Addition”). -
Proper names new to this curriculum require fixed transliterations, to be added to translation memory:
- Noah = नूह (Nuh)
- Lot = लूत (Lut) — already used in the semantic analysis as धरमी लूत
- Sodom = सदोम (Sodom)
- Gomorrah = गमोरा (Gomora)
- Balaam = बलआम (Balaam)
- Moses (implicit, Transfiguration typology) = मूसा (Musa) — reserve for background/teaching notes since 2 Peter’s text does not name him directly
- Elijah (implicit, Transfiguration typology) = एलिय्याह (Eliyyah) — same reservation as Moses
-
Direct OT quotations require fixed renderings usable in any future curriculum quoting the same verse:
- Psalm 90:4 (2 Peter 3:8): “प्रभु आस्तै इक दिन हज़ार साल बरगा है, ते हज़ार साल इक दिन बरगे।” Any future Psalms curriculum translating Psalm 90:4 must match this rendering exactly, per the cross-curriculum consistency principle already established for Romans 1:16-17, 8:28, and 10:9-10.
- Proverbs 26:11 (2 Peter 2:22): fix as “जिस चाल्ले कुत्ता आपणी कैह् पासै मुड़दा है…” — flag clearly in translator notes that only this first half of 2 Peter 2:22 is a canonical OT quotation; the “sow returns to the mire” half is proverbial illustration, not Scripture.
- Isaiah 65:17 / 66:22 (2 Peter 3:13): fix नमां अकाश ते नमीं धरती as the standing Dogri phrase for “new heavens and new earth” across any future Isaiah or Revelation curriculum, matching Revelation 21:1’s use of the identical image.
-
Thematic (non-verbal) OT connections must be flagged in teaching notes even where no fixed quotation-rendering rule applies — most importantly the shared “Day of the LORD” prophetic complex (Joel, Amos, Zephaniah, Malachi) underlying both 2 Peter 3:10 (प्रभु दा दिन) and Romans 10:13’s citation of Joel 2:32. These should be cross-referenced in curriculum materials even though they require no single shared Dogri phrase.
-
Cross-curriculum bridge passages (2 Peter 3:15-16) must be flagged for editorial coordination. Because these verses explicitly refer to Paul’s letters (including Romans) as Scripture, any teaching material built from this passage should explicitly name Romans as an example, reinforcing rather than duplicating the existing Romans Language Package.
-
Typological pairing (flood/fire, Noah/Lot as rescue-patterns) must be taught as historical succession within a single linear timeline, never assimilated to the cyclical dissolution-and-renewal (pralaya) pattern of Hindu cosmology — this rule applies with equal force to every fire/water/judgment/renewal term across chapters 2 and 3, and is the single highest cross-chapter theological caution in this curriculum.
7. Full-Book Coverage Confirmation
- Chapter 1 — reviewed in full; every OT allusion (Psalm 2:7, Isaiah 42:1, Numbers 24:17, Malachi 4:2, Psalm 119:105, Exodus 24/34, 1 Kings 19) and every Romans parallel documented above.
- Chapter 2 — reviewed in full; every named judgment-precedent (Genesis 6, Genesis 19, Numbers 22-24, Proverbs 26:11) and typological pattern documented above.
- Chapter 3 — reviewed in full; every OT allusion and quotation (Genesis 1, Psalm 33, Psalm 90:4, Isaiah 34, Isaiah 65-66, Zephaniah 1, Malachi 4, the Joel-rooted “Day of the LORD” tradition) and the direct literary bridge to Romans (3:15-16) documented above.
- No chapter of 2 Peter lacks cross-reference material; all three chapters are fully represented in this analysis.
See 10_biblical_theme_map.md for how these cross-references organize into the letter’s larger theme structure.