Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference Analysis — Titus

Methodology Note

This document maps every Old Testament quotation, Old Testament allusion, one significant non-scriptural literary quotation, all messianic references, all typological connections, and all parallels to the Romans curriculum found across the whole letter to Titus (chapters 1–3). Citations are given in normalized “Book Chapter:Verse” form (e.g., “Genesis 15:6”, “Galatians 2:16”) to support Phase 2 tooling. Every row records a translation sensitivity note keyed to risks already established in 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md, and to the baseline Romans doctrine_risk_registry.json. A dedicated closing section states rendering-consistency rules for every quotation or theme shared with the Romans curriculum, so that Phase 2 translators and reviewers enforce identical Dogri vocabulary wherever the same underlying Scripture is in view.

Titus contains no formula-introduced Old Testament quotations of the kind found throughout Romans (no “as it is written”). Its scriptural connections are instead dense verbal echoes and conceptual allusions, plus one quotation of a non-biblical Greek source (Titus 1:12). This document treats both categories with equal rigor, since echoes carry the same doctrinal weight as formal citations for translation purposes.


Chapter 1 Cross-Reference Matrix

Titus PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Titus 1:1Apostolic servanthood and callingPaul, God, Jesus ChristRomans 1:1 (identical opening pattern: “servant… called to be an apostle”); Romans 1:1 also introduces “faith of God’s elect” language echoed hereReuse भेजेआ होया (apostle) and परमेश्वर दी चोन (election) exactly as fixed in the Romans TM; परमेश्वर दा सेवक (servant of God) is new but must mirror the Romans self-identification register.
Titus 1:2God’s truthfulness undergirding hopeGod the FatherNumbers 23:19 (“God is not man, that he should lie”); Hebrews 6:18; cf. Romans 3:4 (“let God be true though every one were a liar”)God’s truthfulness is the ground of the “blessed hope” (2:13) and “hope of eternal life” (3:7); must not be rendered with a stock devotional epithet that could equally honor a regional deity’s reliability.
Titus 1:3Promise manifested at the proper timeGod, ChristGalatians 4:4 (“when the fullness of time had come”); Romans 1:2-4 (promised beforehand through the prophets, concerning his Son)Linear, historical, once-for-all fulfillment; must not be read as a cyclical cosmic pattern. Directly reinforces the baseline’s “fulfillment_of_prophecy” doctrine (Critical routing).
Titus 1:4Epistolary grace-and-peace greetingTitusRomans 1:7 (identical greeting formula: “grace and peace”)Reuse बिना कमाई दित्ती दया / शान्ति exactly; this greeting must read identically to the Romans salutation for cross-curriculum consistency.
Titus 1:5-6Appointing qualified eldersElders in Crete’s congregationsExodus 18:13-26 (Jethro’s counsel: capable, God-fearing leaders); Numbers 11:16-17 (seventy Spirit-equipped elders); Acts 14:23 (Paul and Barnabas appoint elders); 1 Timothy 3:1-7 (parallel qualification list); Genesis 2:24 (marriage background for “husband of one wife”)Elder office is a spiritual-character office, established by appointment, not inherited rank; रendering must avoid any resonance with Dogra Rajput hereditary/birthright leadership expectations (per 07/08 notes on कलीसिया दा बड्डा).
Titus 1:9Sound doctrine and correctionTitus, faithful teachers1 Timothy 6:3 (“sound words”); 2 Timothy 4:3 (“sound teaching”)Consistency: खरी सिखलाई must match exactly wherever “sound doctrine” recurs (1:13; 2:1,2,8) and in any future Pastoral-Epistles curriculum.
Titus 1:10-11False teachers of the circumcision party”Those of the circumcision”Acts 15:1-5 (Judaizing controversy); Galatians 2:11-14 (Peter’s confrontation over circumcision-party pressure)Requires a brief explanatory note for an audience with low Old Testament/Second-Temple literacy; must not be read as commentary on present-day Jewish-Christian relations.
Titus 1:12Non-scriptural literary quotationEpimenides (Cretan poet, not a biblical figure)Acts 17:28 (Paul quoting Greek poets at the Areopagus); 1 Corinthians 15:33 (Paul quoting Menander)NOT Scripture. Render as a reported quotation with a translator note explaining Paul is citing a native Cretan source, not delivering his own original insult, and not delivering a divinely inspired oracle. Low doctrinal risk, but comprehension risk without the note.
Titus 1:13-14Jewish myths and human commandmentsFalse teachersIsaiah 29:13 (“commandments of men,” quoted in Matthew 15:9 and Mark 7:7); 1 Timothy 1:4; 1 Timothy 4:7”Myths” (μῦθοι) must be rendered with clear separation from भविष्यवाणी (prophecy, High-risk Reused baseline term) so that true prophetic Scripture and false human myth are never confused in the same semantic field.
Titus 1:15Moral purity vs. ritual purityBelievers vs. “the defiled and unbelieving”Mark 7:15,18-19 (nothing outside a person defiles); Romans 14:14,20 (nothing unclean in itself); Leviticus 11 (background purity code this verse relativizes)High sensitivity. This verse itself argues against a ritual purity/pollution framework. Must use साफ/निर्मल and मैला होया (moral senses), never शुद्ध or भिट्ट (already rejected baseline ritual-purity terms). Requires a translator note explaining Paul is deconstructing, not affirming, ritual-purity logic — highly salient given Duggar darshan-preparation and caste-purity practices.
Titus 1:16Profession of God contradicted by worksFalse teachersMatthew 7:21-23; Romans 2:13; 1 John 2:4Sets up the letter’s closing positive charge (3:8, 3:14) as a deliberate structural mirror-contrast (profession-without-works vs. faith-producing-works); preserve this inclusio in teaching materials.

Chapter 2 Cross-Reference Matrix (including Core Passage 2:11–15)

Titus PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Titus 2:1Sound doctrine (transition)TitusReused-in-book link to Titus 1:9See 1:9 above.
Titus 2:2-6Household virtue codeOlder men/women, younger men/womenEphesians 5:22-6:9; Colossians 3:18-4:1; 1 Peter 2:18-3:7; 1 Timothy 5:1-2NT household-code genre parallel; vocabulary should stay harmonized with any future Ephesians/Colossians/1 Peter curricula for this language.
Titus 2:5The word of God not reviledYounger wivesIsaiah 52:5 (LXX: “my name is blasphemed among the nations”), directly quoted in Romans 2:24Important cross-curriculum echo. Same βλασφημέω root as Romans 2:24. Flag for Phase 2 harmonization: confirm the Dogri verb used for “revile/blaspheme” here (बदनाम करना) matches whatever rendering Romans 2:24 uses or will use, so the same Greek concept is not rendered two different ways across curricula.
Titus 2:9-10Slaves submit to mastersSlaves, mastersEphesians 6:5-8; Colossians 3:22-24; 1 Peter 2:18-20Requires historical-institutional framing note (first-century slavery, not a template for modern coercive labor). Must use the identical अधीन रौह्ना headword used at 2:9 and 3:1 (see Submission to Authority consistency rule below).
Titus 2:11Grace of God appeared, salvation for allIsaiah 52:10 (“all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God”); Isaiah 49:6 (a light to the nations); Luke 2:10-11 (good news of great joy for all people)Universality must not be softened. Directly reinforces the baseline’s “universal_scope_of_gospel” doctrine (Romans 1:16; 10:12-13) — same Critical-tier caution against Dogra Rajput lineage-honor stratification.
Titus 2:13Great God and Savior (deity of Christ)Jesus ChristIsaiah 43:11; Isaiah 45:21 (“I am the LORD, and there is no savior besides me”); 2 Peter 1:1 (identical grammatical construction, “our God and Savior Jesus Christ”)Critical messianic/deity text. Must preserve the single-referent grammar (both “great God” and “Savior” naming Jesus Christ) — see semantic analysis note on this verse. 2 Peter 1:1 is the closest NT structural parallel and should be rendered with the same grammatical strategy if/when translated.
Titus 2:14aRedemption from lawlessnessChristPsalm 130:8 (LXX Psalm 129:8: “he will redeem Israel from all his iniquities” — near word-for-word source of the λυτρόω…ἀνομίας construction)This is the closest OT verbal source for Titus 2:14’s redemption language; requires the छੁटकारा rendering to be introduced with this OT background so learners see it as fulfillment, not innovation.
Titus 2:14bPurify a treasured peopleChrist, the churchExodus 19:5 (λαὸς περιούσιος, LXX); Deuteronomy 7:6; Deuteronomy 14:2; Deuteronomy 26:18 (Israel as God’s treasured possession); Ezekiel 37:23 (cleansing and covenant people); 1 Peter 2:9 (NT parallel, “a people for his own possession”)Critical typological transfer. Israel’s Exodus-covenant treasured-possession identity is applied to the church across every lineage. Must not be read through a Dogra Rajput lineage/caste-elite lens, per the baseline’s “church_as_gods_people” and “unity_of_jews_and_gentiles” doctrines.
Titus 2:14cZealous for good worksBelieversDeuteronomy 26:18-19 (Israel as a treasured people who keep God’s commandments); Ephesians 2:10 (“created… for good works”)Fruit-not-root order must match Ephesians 2:8-10’s grace-then-works sequence exactly.
Titus 2:15Declaring, exhorting, rebukingTitus2 Timothy 4:2 (preach, reprove, rebuke, exhort)Parallel Pastoral-Epistles ministry-charge language; low risk, keep consistent if 2 Timothy is later translated.

Chapter 3 Cross-Reference Matrix (including Core Passage 3:1–8)

Titus PassageThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Titus 3:1Submit to rulers and authoritiesTitus’s congregations, civil rulersRomans 13:1-7 (the direct doctrinal twin passage); 1 Peter 2:13-17Major consistency point. अधीन रौह्ना and राज-अधिकारी must be used identically here and wherever Romans 13:1-7 is taught, so the “Submission to Authority” doctrine reads as one coherent teaching across both curricula.
Titus 3:2Gentleness and courtesy toward allBelieversPhilippians 4:5 (“let your gentleness be known to everyone”); James 3:17 (wisdom’s gentleness)Low-Medium risk; tone-setting for both submission (3:1) and correction (1:13; 2:15).
Titus 3:3The “before” picture: former slavery to sinPaul, Titus, all believersRomans 1:29-31 (vice list); Ephesians 2:1-3; Colossians 3:5-8; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 (“such were some of you… but now”)Same rhetorical “before/but now” contrast structure as 1 Corinthians 6:11 and Ephesians 2:1-5. The “but” (δέ) opening 3:4 must land with full rhetorical force in Dogri — this is the letter’s hinge verse.
Titus 3:4-5aKindness and mercy of God our Savior appeared; not by worksGod, ChristEphesians 2:4-7 (God’s mercy and kindness in Christ Jesus); Psalm 86:5; Psalm 103:8 (God abounding in mercy); Genesis 15:6 (Abraham’s faith credited as righteousness — root OT text behind the whole “not by works” doctrinal cluster)Same grace-not-works logic as Romans 3:24, Romans 4:4-5, Romans 9:11-12, Romans 11:5-6 (all baseline Critical). धरमीपन and नेक कम्म vocabulary must be applied with the identical fruit/root discipline used in the Romans materials.
Titus 3:5bWashing of regenerationHoly SpiritEzekiel 36:25-27 (sprinkle clean water, give a new heart and a new spirit — the direct OT conceptual source); John 3:3-8 (born again/born of the Spirit); Acts 2:38; 1 Corinthians 6:11 (“washed, sanctified, justified”)Critical. Ezekiel 36:25-27 should be cited in teaching notes to anchor “washing/regeneration” in prophetic promise, not in temple/pilgrimage ritual bathing (Vaishno Devi darshan preparation) or reincarnation cosmology. John 3’s “born again” is the closest NT parallel term; Dogri vocabulary must stay compatible (जीवन, never जनम-rooted compounds), matching the choice already made for παλιγγενεσία.
Titus 3:6Spirit poured out through Jesus ChristHoly Spirit, ChristJoel 2:28-29 (“I will pour out my Spirit”); Acts 2:17-18, 2:33 (Pentecost fulfillment, poured out through the exalted Christ)Important parallel to Romans. Romans 10:13 quotes Joel 2:32 (“everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved”) — the very same OT chapter (Joel 2) anchors both curricula’s core doctrines. Ensure any Joel-sourced Spirit/salvation vocabulary is harmonized between Romans and Titus teaching materials.
Titus 3:7Justified by grace; heirs of eternal lifeBelieversRomans 3:24; Romans 5:1 (justified by grace); Romans 8:17 (heirs, fellow heirs with Christ); Galatians 3:29; Galatians 4:7 (heirs according to promise); Genesis 15:6 (root text for imputed righteousness)Critical, direct terminological overlap with Romans. धर्मी ठहराए जाना and वारिस (built alongside गोद लैने आह् पुत्तर बनाना) must carry the identical sense used for Romans 4 and Romans 8; this verse is functionally a one-sentence summary of Romans’s whole justification-and-adoption argument.
Titus 3:8Devotion to good works, profitable teachingBelieversJames 2:14-26 (faith without works is dead); Ephesians 2:10Closes the fruit/root loop opened at 3:5’s “not by works”; the order (grace/regeneration first, works as fruit) must be unmistakable.
Titus 3:9Foolish controversies, genealogies, quarrels about the lawTitus’s congregations1 Timothy 1:4 (myths and endless genealogies); 1 Timothy 6:4 (disputes about words); 2 Timothy 2:23 (foolish, ignorant controversies)Must be explicitly distinguished from the positive Davidic-genealogy theology of Romans 1:3 and the baseline’s “seed_of_david”/“davidic_covenant” doctrines. This verse condemns quarrelsome preoccupation with lineage disputes, not lineage theology itself — a distinction with real cultural weight given Dogra Rajput vansh-consciousness.
Titus 3:10-11The divisive/factious personAn unnamed factious individualMatthew 18:15-17 (process of correction); Romans 16:17 (watch those who cause divisions); 2 Thessalonians 3:14-15Apply narrowly to a proven, repeated pattern after warning — never to a first disagreement, an honest theological question, or a native-speaker reviewer’s challenge during Phase 2 review.
Titus 3:12-13Named co-workers and travel instructionsArtemas, Tychicus, Zenas, Apollos; place-name NicopolisActs 18:24 (Apollos); 2 Timothy 4:12 (Tychicus)Standard transliterated proper names, consistent with the baseline’s convention for proper nouns (दाऊद, इस्राएल). Low risk.
Titus 3:14Devotion to good works for urgent needs”Our people”Same good-works cluster as 3:8; Ephesians 4:28 (working to have something to share with those in need)Final restatement of the letter’s fruit-not-root structure; forms a closing bracket with 1:16’s negative mirror.
Titus 3:15Closing grace benedictionTitus, “all with you”Romans 16:20; Romans 16:24 (identical closing-grace formula); Galatians 6:18; Philippians 4:23Reuse बिना कमाई दित्ती दया exactly, matching the Romans closing benediction word-for-word.

Messianic References Summary

Titus PassageMessianic ContentOT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Titus 1:2-3Eternal promise manifested in history at the proper timeRomans 1:2-4 (promised beforehand through the prophets, concerning his Son); Galatians 4:4Reinforces the baseline’s “messianic_promise” and “fulfillment_of_prophecy” doctrines (both Critical/High). Christ’s coming is the fulfillment of a single unified promise, not one of several religious figures’ periodic appearances.
Titus 2:13Jesus Christ named “great God and Savior”Isaiah 43:11; Isaiah 45:21; 2 Peter 1:1Direct affirmation of full deity — the letter’s single most theologically weighted messianic/Christological statement. See baseline “deity_of_christ” and “sonship_of_christ” doctrines (both Critical).
Titus 2:14Christ’s self-giving redemptive deathIsaiah 53:5-6,12 (Suffering Servant, substitutionary death); Mark 10:45 (“give his life as a ransom for many”); 1 Timothy 2:6 (“gave himself as a ransom for all”)Substitutionary atonement; per baseline escalation rules, atonement/propitiation-adjacent language always requires human theologian review.
Titus 3:6The Spirit given “through Jesus Christ our Savior”Joel 2:28-29; Acts 2:33 (Christ, having been exalted, pours out the Spirit)Christ is the mediating agent of Pentecost fulfillment; Messiah’s exaltation, not merely his first appearing, is in view here.

Typological Connections

Type (OT)Antitype/Fulfillment (Titus)ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Israel as God’s treasured possession (Exodus 19:5; Deuteronomy 7:6; Deuteronomy 14:2)The church as λαὸς περιούσιος (Titus 2:14)Israel’s unique covenant-possession identity is extended to a Jew-and-Gentile people constituted by graceMust not be filtered through Dogra Rajput lineage/caste-elite categories; the church is God’s treasured people across every lineage, not an inherited-birthright class.
Exodus redemption from Egypt / Psalm 130:8’s redemption from iniquityChrist’s redemption from lawlessness (Titus 2:14)Old covenant redemption-by-God’s-mighty-act becomes the pattern for redemption-by-Christ’s-self-giftCostly, historical, personal deliverance — not to be confused with छੁटकारा as escape from an impersonal karmic/rebirth cycle (मुक्ति, already forbidden in the baseline).
OT elder-councils (Exodus 18; Numbers 11)Church elders (Titus 1:5-9)Character-qualified, Spirit-enabled communal leadershipOffice established by appointment and character, not by hereditary rank.
Ritual washings and the water of purification (Ezekiel 36:25; Numbers 19:9; 2 Kings 5:10-14, Naaman)The Spirit’s washing of regeneration (Titus 3:5)External ceremonial cleansing anticipates and is fulfilled by inward Spirit-wrought cleansingCritical. Explicit teaching note required distinguishing this fulfillment-typology from ongoing ritual bathing practice (Vaishno Devi darshan preparation, Ganga-style immersion) — the type is fulfilled and completed, not repeated.
Sinai covenant renewal promise of a new heart (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Ezekiel 36:26)New Covenant regeneration by the Spirit (Titus 3:5)Prophesied inward transformation now accomplishedSame collision guard as παλιγγενεσία throughout — never πुनर्जन्म/आवागमन framing.

Parallels to the Romans Curriculum

Shared DoctrineRomans Anchor Passage(s)Titus Anchor Passage(s)Consistency Rule
Grace as unmerited favorRomans 3:24; 4:4-5; 11:5-6Titus 2:11; 3:4-5,7,15Reuse बिना कमाई दित्ती दया verbatim; never a mannat vow-boon or पुण्य merit framing in either curriculum.
Justification by faithRomans 3:21-28; 4:1-8; 5:1Titus 3:7Reuse धर्मी ठहराए जाना verbatim; forensic declared-righteousness sense, never mere forgiveness.
Salvation not by worksRomans 9:11-12; 11:5-6Titus 3:5Identical fruit/root discipline: works are never the ground, always the consequence, of salvation.
Adoption / inheritanceRomans 8:14-17,23Titus 3:7गोद लैने आह् पुत्तर बनाना and new term वारिस (heir) must be taught together as one doctrine of full, secure inheritance rights.
Faith and its objectRomans 1:17; 3:22-28; 10:9-10Titus 1:1,4,13; 2:2,10; 3:8,15Reuse भरोसा verbatim; the object of faith (God/Christ) must always be recoverable from context in both curricula.
ApostleshipRomans 1:1; 11:13Titus 1:1Reuse भेजेआ होया verbatim.
ElectionRomans 8:28-30; 9:11-12; 11:5-7Titus 1:1Reuse परमेश्वर दी चोन verbatim; never किस्मत (fate).
Submission to civil authorityRomans 13:1-7Titus 3:1Reuse अधीन रौह्ना and राज-अधिकारी identically; both passages teach the same doctrine and must read as one teaching, not two.
Vice-list contrast rhetoric (“before/but now”)Romans 1:29-31Titus 3:3-4Preserve the same rhetorical hinge structure; the contrastive “but” must carry full force in both.
Unity and avoidance of divisionRomans 14:1-15:7; 16:17-18Titus 3:9-11Both passages guard church unity while permitting doctrinal correction; neither should be applied to silence legitimate theological inquiry.
Epistolary grace-and-peace greetingRomans 1:7Titus 1:4Identical greeting formula; render word-for-word identically.
Closing grace benedictionRomans 16:20,24Titus 3:15Identical closing formula; render word-for-word identically.
Universal scope of the gospelRomans 1:16; 10:12-13Titus 2:11Retain unqualified universality (“to all people”) in both; do not soften against lineage-honor stratification.

Rendering-Consistency Rules for Shared Quotations and Echoes

  1. Isaiah 52:5 / Romans 2:24 / Titus 2:5 — Both New Testament passages echo the same OT verse about God’s name/word being “reviled/blasphemed” among unbelievers because of believers’ conduct. Whatever Dogri verb is finalized for βλασφημέω in Romans 2:24 (if/when that passage is translated) MUST be the same verb used at Titus 2:5 (currently बदनाम करना). Flag for Phase 2 harmonization review before either document is finalized.

  2. Joel 2:28-32 / Romans 10:13 / Titus 3:6 — Romans 10:13 quotes Joel 2:32 directly (“everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved”); Titus 3:6 echoes the immediately preceding verses of the same chapter (Joel 2:28-29, the Spirit poured out). Both curricula draw on the same OT prophetic chapter. Any teaching note referencing Joel in either curriculum should cross-reference the other passage, and Spirit/salvation vocabulary must remain harmonized (पवित्तर आत्मा, उद्धार).

  3. Genesis 15:6 / Romans 4:3 / Titus 3:5,7 — The Abraham-faith-credited-as-righteousness text underlies both Romans 4’s extended argument and Titus 3:5-7’s compressed summary. गिनी गेई धरमीपन (imputed righteousness, baseline Critical) and the Titus 3:5 “not by works” clause must be taught as the same doctrine in miniature.

  4. Psalm 130:8 / Titus 2:14 — Though Romans does not quote this verse directly, it belongs to the same redemption-by-God’s-initiative theme running through Romans 3:24’s ἀπολύτρωσις (redemption). Ensure छੁटकारा (Titus’s redemption term) and any future Romans रendering of “redemption” are built on compatible, non-competing vocabulary so a Dogri reader recognizes them as the same doctrine.

  5. Romans 13:1-7 / Titus 3:1-2 — These are the two closest textual twins across the whole Pauline corpus on civil submission. अधीन रौह्ना and राज-अधिकारी must be used identically in both; any future Romans 13 teaching material must load this Titus glossary entry (or vice versa) before translation.

  6. Romans 1:1,7 / Titus 1:1,4 and Romans 16:20,24 / Titus 3:15 — Opening and closing epistolary formulas. These must be rendered identically letter-for-letter across both curricula; any deviation should be treated as a translation memory violation, not a stylistic variant.

  7. Non-scriptural quotation caution (Titus 1:12) — The Epimenides quotation must never be treated as inspired Scripture in translation notes or footnotes; keep it visually and grammatically marked as reported cultural speech, consistent with how Acts 17:28 and 1 Corinthians 15:33 should eventually be handled if those passages are translated for this language.

  8. Genealogies (Titus 3:9) vs. seed-of-David theology (Romans 1:3) — These must never share the same Dogri phrase without a disambiguating note. बंस-परमपरा दी गल्लां (Titus 3:9, negative/unprofitable sense) must remain visibly distinct in surrounding teaching material from दाऊद दे वंश चा (seed of David, Romans 1:3, positive/covenantal sense), even though both are built on the vansh/lineage root.


Summary: Coverage Confirmation

Every chapter of Titus (1, 2, 3) has been reviewed above for Old Testament quotations and allusions, the one non-scriptural literary quotation (1:12), messianic references, typological connections, and parallels to the Romans curriculum. No chapter contributes zero cross-reference material; Titus 1, despite falling entirely outside the core passage, carries the heaviest concentration of Old Testament allusion (elder-office typology, the circumcision-party controversy, the Isaiah 29:13/Mark 7:7 “commandments of men” echo, and the Mark 7:15/Leviticus 11 purity-code relativization at 1:15).

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words