Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Doctrine Analysis

Doctrine Analysis

This Language Package’s doctrine_risk_registry.json tracks 40 doctrines across Romans 1-16, each assigned a risk tier that drives Phase 2 review routing.

Risk tier summary

TierCountReview routingExample doctrines
Critical8Human theologian, every occurrenceSalvation, Incarnation, Grace, Deity of Christ, Sonship of Christ, Resurrection of Christ, Lordship of Christ, Messianic Promise
High20Human theologianGospel, Divine Calling, Faith, Sanctification, Providence, Universal Scope of the Gospel, Unity of Jews and Gentiles
Medium9Native speaker reviewApostleship, Prayer and Intercession, Spiritual Gifts, Mission to the Nations, Evangelism, Church as God’s People, Kingdom Mission
Low3Automated review onlyThanksgiving, Mutual Edification, Christian Fellowship

Why Critical doctrines cluster where they do

Dogri’s eight Critical-risk doctrines cluster around two specific, nameable local institutions rather than a diffuse cultural background. Incarnation, Sonship, and Deity of Christ are Critical because Raghunath Mandir’s royally patronized Rama-avatar devotion gives avatar theology unusual local prestige. Grace and Salvation are Critical because the Vaishno Devi pilgrimage’s mannat vow economy offers a concrete, currently active transactional model that a fluent-sounding Dogri rendering could accidentally reproduce. This is not a coincidence: these are precisely the doctrines where the “obvious” translation risks importing the exact framework Romans is written against.

Review routing rationale

Critical and High risk doctrines (28 of 40) require mandatory human theologian review because an automated or native-speaker-only check could confirm the Dogri is fluent without catching that it imports avatar theology or vow-exchange logic — or, in the opposite failure mode, that it has silently drifted into a Hindi Christian term rather than Dogri’s own vocabulary. Native speaker review is sufficient for Medium-risk doctrines, where the concern is cultural fit (e.g. colonial-mission associations, honor-culture sensitivity) rather than doctrinal contradiction.