Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Cross-Reference Analysis

Cross-Reference Analysis — Galatians (English → Dogri)

Methodology

This document maps every Old Testament quotation and allusion, every messianic reference, every typological pattern, and every load-bearing narrative-character reference across the whole of Galatians 1–6, and cross-references each against the existing Romans Dogri Language Package where the same Scripture, doctrine, or wording is shared. Citations use normalized Book Chapter:Verse form (e.g. Galatians 2:16, Genesis 15:6) so Phase 2 tooling can match references programmatically.

Three categories are distinguished throughout:

  • Direct Quotation — Paul explicitly cites OT text (often with a citation formula such as “as it is written”).
  • Allusion — Clear verbal/conceptual echo without a citation formula.
  • Typology — A person, office, or event functioning as a pattern fulfilled or reconfigured in Christ or the church.

Where a quotation or theme is also used in the baseline Romans package, this is flagged [ROMANS PARALLEL] with the specific required consistency rule stated in Part C/D. Where a Dogri rendering choice carries a Duggar-culture collision risk already documented in 07_semantic_analysis.md / 08_core_glossary.md, that risk is restated briefly rather than re-derived.


PART A — OT Quotation and Allusion Matrix, by Chapter

Chapter 1

Passage (Galatians)TypeTheme(s)Related Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Galatians 1:1AllusionResurrection of Christ; Paul’s ApostleshipGod the Father; ChristBackground hope: Isaiah 26:19; Daniel 12:2. [ROMANS PARALLEL] Romans 1:4, 4:24, 6:4, 8:11 (identical resurrection formula)Use [BASELINE] मुर्दघरा चा जिंदा होना; never पुनर्जन्म
Galatians 1:4AllusionCrucified with Christ; The True GospelChristSuffering Servant background: Isaiah 53:5-6,12 (“he was pierced for our transgressions… poured out his life”)Never अर्पण; render as substitutionary self-giving, आपणी जान…दित्ती
Galatians 1:6-9AllusionTrue Gospel versus False GospelsPaul; unnamed false teachersCovenant-fidelity warning pattern: Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32 (“you shall not add to the word… nor take from it”)The anathema (फिटकार) is a covenant-guarding formula, not a personal insult; preserve its formal, judicial weight
Galatians 1:13-14AllusionPaul’s ApostleshipPaul (former persecutor); typological echo of zealous OT figuresPhinehas’s zeal, Numbers 25:11; Psalm 106:30-31; Elijah’s zeal, 1 Kings 19:10Paul’s former “zeal for the traditions of the fathers” (पूर्वजां दी रीत-रिवाज) is presented positively in its OT type but negatively as a rival to gospel-revelation here — do not flatten this tension
Galatians 1:15AllusionDivine Calling; ElectionPaul; typological echo of prophetic call-narrativesJeremiah 1:5 (“before I formed you in the womb I knew you… I appointed you a prophet”); Isaiah 49:1,5 (servant called from the womb)Reuse [BASELINE] परमेश्वर दी चोन (election) and सद्देआ होया (called); must not read as किस्मत (fate)
Galatians 1:16— (doctrinal term, not OT quotation)Sonship/Deity of ChristChrist[ROMANS PARALLEL] identical term, Romans 1:4, 1:9[BASELINE] परमेश्वर दा पुत्तर, Critical
Galatians 1:18-24NarrativePaul’s ApostleshipCephas (Peter); James (the Lord’s brother); churches of JudeaEstablishes independent, direct apostolic commission prior to any human sanctioning — narrative parallel to Acts 9:26-30No OT quotation; note for translators that “Cephas” (Aramaic) and “Peter” both refer to the same figure — keep consistent naming across the letter

Chapter 2 (2:1-14; see Core Passage treatment below for 2:15-21)

Passage (Galatians)TypeTheme(s)Related Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Galatians 2:1-10NarrativePaul’s Apostleship; Unity of Jews and GentilesBarnabas; Titus; James, Cephas, John (“pillars”)Jerusalem council background, cf. Acts 15:1-29”Pillars” (थम्म) must read as a leadership metaphor, not temple architecture (avoid Raghunath Mandir pillar-hall association)
Galatians 2:6AllusionUniversal Human Accountability; Justification by FaithGod; James, Cephas, JohnDeuteronomy 10:17 (“God… shows no partiality”); Leviticus 19:15; 2 Chronicles 19:7[ROMANS PARALLEL — conceptual] Romans 2:11 uses the identical “no partiality” formula; render with the same phrase-structure used there if Phase 2 encounters Romans 2:11, for consistency of God’s impartial-judgment vocabulary
Galatians 2:9AllusionUnity of Jews and Gentiles; Christian FellowshipJames, Cephas, JohnMetaphor pattern of temple “pillars” (e.g. 1 Kings 7:21, Jachin and Boaz) applied to leadersConfirm figurative use only; do not let थम्म acquire devotional-architecture overtones
Galatians 2:11-14NarrativeUnity of Jews and Gentiles; True Gospel vs. False GospelsCephas (Peter); “certain men from James”; BarnabasTable-fellowship dispute; background Acts 10-11 (Peter’s vision, Cornelius) — Peter had already conceded the Gentile-inclusion principle before this lapsePeter’s inconsistency (पाखंड) must be preserved as public rebuke, not softened for honor-preservation reasons (relevant given izzat-culture sensitivities around public correction)
Galatians 2:16AllusionJustification by Faith; Law and GracePaul; Peter (addressee)Echoes Psalm 143:2 (“no one living is righteous before you”). [ROMANS PARALLEL — near-verbatim] Romans 3:20 (“no human being will be justified by works of the law… through the law comes knowledge of sin”)CRITICAL: the shared clause “no one/no human being is justified by works of the law” must be rendered with the identical Dogri wording used for Romans 3:20 wherever both texts are handled in this Language Package. See Part C rule 4
Galatians 2:20Typology/AllusionCrucified with Christ; Adoption and SonshipChrist; PaulSuffering Servant background, Isaiah 53; also anticipates the “Son of God… loved me” language paralleling Romans 8:32,37-39 (“he who did not spare his own Son… who loved us”)[ROMANS PARALLEL] the “loved me/us” and self-giving language should echo, without being mechanically identical to, Romans 8:32-39’s assurance-of-salvation language

Chapter 3

This chapter contains the letter’s densest concentration of direct OT quotations.

Passage (Galatians)TypeTheme(s)Related Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Galatians 3:6Direct QuotationJustification by Faith; Abrahamic CovenantAbrahamGenesis 15:6 — “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” [ROMANS PARALLEL — identical citation] Romans 4:3, 4:9, 4:22CRITICAL: must use the exact [BASELINE] term गिनी गेई धरमीपन (“credited righteousness”) verbatim, identical to its Romans 4 rendering. See Part C rule 1
Galatians 3:8Direct QuotationAbrahamic Covenant and Promise; Mission to the NationsAbraham; “all the nations/Gentiles”Genesis 12:3 / Genesis 18:18 (conflated) — “In you shall all the nations be blessed.” Related: Genesis 22:18Messianic: the promised blessing to “all nations” is fulfilled specifically in Christ (Galatians 3:16); गैर-यहूदी ([BASELINE]) is the referent-class receiving this blessing
Galatians 3:10Direct QuotationThe Law’s Purpose; Curse of the LawDeuteronomy 27:26 — “Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the Book of the Law.”HIGH: श्राप must always be qualified as (व्यवस्था दा) श्राप — bare श्राप risks conflation with Baba Jitto’s folk-curse pronounced on the exploitative landlord’s lineage, commemorated at the Aghar Jitto shrine and annual Jitto Da Mela. See 08_core_glossary.md
Galatians 3:11Direct QuotationJustification by Faith; Law and GraceThe righteous person (generic)Habakkuk 2:4 — “The righteous shall live by faith.” [ROMANS PARALLEL — identical citation, thesis-level] Romans 1:17CRITICAL: Romans 1:16-17 is designated in the baseline 12_ai_translation_requirements.md as requiring identical rendering across ALL documents in this Language Package (“Same rendering of Romans 1:16-17 across all documents… This is the thesis statement of the curriculum”). The Habakkuk 2:4 clause in Galatians 3:11 MUST use that exact same Dogri wording, word-for-word
Galatians 3:12Direct QuotationThe Law’s PurposeMoses (as lawgiver)Leviticus 18:5 — “The one who does them shall live by them.”Contrast term with 3:11; law’s own internal logic is performance-based, unlike faith’s logic — must not be blended into a single reading
Galatians 3:13Direct QuotationCrucified with Christ; The Law’s PurposeChristDeuteronomy 21:23 — “Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree.” Messianic/typological fulfillment in the crucifixionCRITICAL: this is Christ becoming the curse for others (substitution), the positive resolution of the curse introduced in 3:10 — qualify श्राप the same way; cross-reference to Isaiah 53 substitutionary background reinforces (never अर्पण)
Galatians 3:15-18AllusionAbrahamic Covenant and PromiseAbrahamAncient covenant/testament legal practice pattern (cf. Genesis 15, Genesis 17); conceptually parallel to Hebrews 9:15-17 (different curriculum, note only)नियम ([BASELINE] covenant) must retain its relational-bond sense here, not a negotiable legal contract — same caution as baseline’s समझौता rejection
Galatians 3:16Typology/AllusionAbrahamic Covenant and Promise; Messianic PromiseAbraham; Christ (as the singular “seed”)Genesis 12:7, Genesis 13:15, Genesis 24:7, Genesis 22:18 (seed promise formula)HIGH: Paul’s argument depends on the Greek/Hebrew grammatical singularity of “seed,” read typologically as Christ. Dogri वंश does not naturally preserve this singular/collective ambiguity — flag explicitly for the Phase 2 translator/reviewer, do not resolve silently
Galatians 3:19AllusionThe Law’s PurposeMoses (mediator); angelsDeuteronomy 33:2 (LXX); parallel Acts 7:53 (different curriculum, note only); extra-biblical Jewish tradition of angelic law-givingEstablishes the law’s indirect, mediated mode of transmission, contrasted with the direct promise-relationship of faith
Galatians 3:22AllusionUniversal Human AccountabilityGenesis 3 (fall narrative background); [ROMANS PARALLEL] Romans 3:9, 3:23 (“all… under sin”)Retain unqualified universality — “Scripture imprisoned everything under sin” — consistent with baseline’s rule against softening “all have sinned”
Galatians 3:26-29Allusion/TypologyAdoption and Sonship; Unity of Jews and GentilesAbraham (as father-type); believers (as heirs)Genesis 12, 15, 17 (Abrahamic covenant); baptismal formula echoes Genesis 1:27 (“male and female”) reversed into transcended distinctionGalatians 3:28’s “neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female” directly parallels [ROMANS PARALLEL] Romans 3:22, 10:12 (“no distinction”)—retain unqualified per baseline’s existing rule for Unity of Jews and Gentiles, including against Dogra Rajput izzat stratification

Chapter 4

Passage (Galatians)TypeTheme(s)Related Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Galatians 4:4Typology/FulfillmentIncarnation; Adoption and SonshipChrist (the Son); Mary (unnamed, “a woman”)Possible distant background Genesis 3:15 (“offspring of the woman”); messianic-birth expectation background Isaiah 7:14, Micah 5:2 (not directly quoted)CRITICAL: NEVER अवतार. [BASELINE REUSE] मानखे दा रूप लैना / परमेश्वर दा पुत्तर. Raghunath Mandir’s Dogra-royal-patronized Rama-avatar devotion makes this the single highest-risk verse in the chapter
Galatians 4:5— (doctrinal term)Adoption and SonshipBelievers[ROMANS PARALLEL — identical term] Romans 8:15, 8:23 (υἱοθεσία)[BASELINE] गोद लैने आह् पुत्तर बनाना, High
Galatians 4:6AllusionAdoption and SonshipHoly Spirit; believers[ROMANS PARALLEL — identical formula] Romans 8:15 (“Abba, Father”)CRITICAL for cross-document consistency: this exact phrase must match Romans 8:15’s rendering word-for-word — see baseline’s cross-document consistency table
Galatians 4:8-9AllusionFreedom in Christ; The Law’s PurposeFormer Gentile devotees (Galatian readers)Background: Israel’s repeated OT temptation toward idolatry, e.g. Exodus 32, Judges 2:11-13Requires pastoral sensitivity: parallels the Galatians’ former devotion to “those who by nature are not gods” to any Duggar convert’s own family devotional history (Vaishno Devi, Raghunath Mandir, Bahu Fort) — translate with full doctrinal clarity, no derision
Galatians 4:21-31Typology (explicit, Paul-signaled “allegory”)Abrahamic Covenant; Law and Grace; Freedom in ChristHagar; Sarah; Ishmael; IsaacGenesis 16:1-16, Genesis 21:1-21Two-covenant typology: slave-woman/law-bondage vs. free-woman/promise-freedom. Must preserve as Paul’s own explicit interpretive move (रूपक), not as an incidental illustration
Galatians 4:27Direct QuotationFreedom in Christ; Abrahamic CovenantPersonified barren woman (Sarah-type; also read eschatologically of the heavenly Jerusalem/church)Isaiah 54:1 — “Rejoice, O barren one who does not bear…”Eschatological fruitfulness of the promise-covenant community, contrasted with law-bound barrenness
Galatians 4:29AllusionLaw and GraceIshmael; IsaacGenesis 21:9 (Ishmael’s mocking of Isaac, read by Paul as “persecution”)Establishes ongoing pattern: those born “according to the flesh” oppose those born “according to the Spirit”
Galatians 4:30Direct QuotationAdoption and Sonship; Abrahamic CovenantSarah (speaker); Hagar; Ishmael; IsaacGenesis 21:10 — “Cast out the slave woman and her son, for the son of the slave woman shall not inherit with the son of the free woman.”Scriptural warrant for excluding law-based religion as a rival inheritance-basis; resonates with (and must correct) Dogra Rajput lineage/izzat-based inheritance expectations

Chapter 5

Passage (Galatians)TypeTheme(s)Related Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Galatians 5:1Typological AllusionFreedom in ChristExodus deliverance-from-slavery pattern, Exodus 1-15 (Egypt bondage/exodus, not directly quoted but structurally echoed by “yoke of slavery” language)आजादी must not collapse into political-independence connotations nor into मुक्ति (rebirth-liberation, forbidden throughout baseline)
Galatians 5:3AllusionCircumcision and the New Creation; The Law’s PurposeGenesis 17:10-14 (institution of circumcision as covenant sign)खतna must be clarified via translator note as the OT covenant sign, not a marker of conversion to Islam, per baseline’s existing caution
Galatians 5:14Direct QuotationFaith Working through Love; The Law’s PurposeLeviticus 19:18 — “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” [ROMANS PARALLEL — identical citation] Romans 13:9CRITICAL for consistency: must match the Dogri rendering used for this same Leviticus citation in Romans 13:9 exactly. See Part C rule 3
Galatians 5:19-21Allusion (vice catalogue)Flesh versus SpiritWisdom/vice-list tradition, e.g. Proverbs 6:16-19; structurally parallel to [ROMANS PARALLEL] Romans 1:29-31’s vice listNot a direct quotation in either letter, but the two vice-lists should use consistent Dogri renderings for shared items (e.g. idolatry, strife, envy) across the Galatians and Romans curricula where the same English/Greek term recurs
Galatians 5:22-23— (doctrinal term list)Fruit of the SpiritContrasts grammatically-singular “fruit” with the plural “works” of 5:19-21 — an internal literary device, not an OT quotationPreserve singular/plural contrast structurally in Dogri phrasing where feasible

Chapter 6

Passage (Galatians)TypeTheme(s)Related Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Galatians 6:2AllusionBearing One Another’s BurdensChrist (implicit pattern)Distant echo of Isaiah 53:4 (“he has borne our griefs”) as ethical pattern extended to community life; not a direct quotationBearing burdens (बोझ चुक्कणा) as communal outworking of the cross-pattern, not merely generic kindness
Galatians 6:7AllusionLaw and Grace; general ethical exhortationWisdom-tradition sowing/reaping proverbs: Job 4:8, Proverbs 22:8, Hosea 8:7, Hosea 10:12Moral-causal, not karmic-cyclical; must not be read through a rebirth/samsara framework — same caution already flagged in 07_semantic_analysis.md
Galatians 6:15AllusionCircumcision and the New CreationBackground Genesis 17:10-14 (circumcision); conceptually parallel to 1 Corinthians 7:19 (different curriculum, note only)नमीं सृष्टि must not be conflated with Hindu cosmological creation-cycle (Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva srishti) imagery
Galatians 6:16AllusionUnity of Jews and Gentiles”Israel of God”Psalm 125:5, Psalm 128:6 (“peace be upon Israel”) — covenant-blessing formula reapplied[BASELINE REUSE] इस्राएल; परमेश्वर दा इस्राएल extends covenant-people language to the mixed Jew-Gentile church, per Unity of Jews and Gentiles doctrine
Galatians 6:17AllusionCrucified with Christ; Paul’s ApostleshipPaulPossible background: ancient branding/ownership marks (cf. slave-marking practice; also priestly/covenant marking traditions)Must not be equated with a devotional tilak or pilgrimage-mark (Vaishno Devi/Raghunath Mandir ash or sandalwood marks) — these are involuntary suffering-scars, not a voluntary religious identity-marker, per 08_core_glossary.md

PART B — Messianic References and Typology (Consolidated)

Type/Pattern (OT)Fulfillment/Antitype (NT, in Galatians)Key PassagesTheological PointDogri Sensitivity
The singular “seed” of AbrahamChrist, then all who are “in Christ”Genesis 12:7; 13:15; 22:18Galatians 3:16, 29The promise narrows to one man (Christ) before widening again to all believers by union with himFlag वंश’s singular/plural ambiguity for every occurrence
The one hanged/cursed on a treeChrist crucified, bearing the law’s curse for othersDeuteronomy 21:23Galatians 3:13Substitutionary curse-bearing, resolving the curse pronounced in Deuteronomy 27:26श्राप always qualified; never bare, to avoid Baba Jitto folk-curse conflation
The barren woman made fruitfulThe heavenly Jerusalem / the promise-covenant churchIsaiah 54:1Galatians 4:27Eschatological fruitfulness of grace-based, not law-based, covenant membershipAvoid geographic mountain-shrine pilgrimage resonance for “Jerusalem above”
Hagar and Sarah, Ishmael and IsaacTwo covenants: law-bondage and promise-freedom; slave-born vs. promise-bornGenesis 16; 21Galatians 4:21-31Believers are children of promise, not of ordinary human effort or lineageCorrects, without mocking, Dogra Rajput lineage/izzat-based identity claims
Servant/Son sent, born of woman, born under the lawThe Incarnation of the eternal SonIsaiah 7:14 (background)Galatians 4:4Full, genuine, historical human birth of the eternal Son, onceCRITICAL — never अवतार
Suffering Servant who gives himselfChrist’s self-giving death “for our sins” / “for me”Isaiah 53Galatians 1:4; 2:20; 3:13Substitutionary atonement, not devotional offeringNever अर्पण
The righteous who lives by faith (Habakkuk’s prophetic assurance)Justification by faith apart from law-worksHabakkuk 2:4Galatians 3:11Thesis-level doctrine shared verbatim with RomansMust match Romans 1:17 rendering exactly
Abraham’s blessing to “all the nations”Gentile inclusion in the gospelGenesis 12:3; 18:18Galatians 3:8, 14The Abrahamic promise was always Gentile-inclusive; the gospel is its fulfillment, not a departure from itगैर-यहूदी ([BASELINE]), मिशन दा कम्म framing

PART C — Parallels to Romans: Shared Quotations and Required Rendering-Consistency Rules

The following Scripture citations occur in both Galatians and the baseline Romans curriculum. Because both curricula share the same Dogri Language Package, the Dogri rendering of each shared citation must be identical wherever it occurs, per the baseline’s existing “Theological Consistency Rules Across Documents.”

#Shared OT/Formula CitationGalatians OccurrenceRomans OccurrenceConsistency Rule
1Genesis 15:6 — “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”Galatians 3:6Romans 4:3, 4:9, 4:22Use [BASELINE] गिनी गेई धरमीपन verbatim in both; this is the imputed_righteousness Critical-risk term — no paraphrase permitted in either document
2Habakkuk 2:4 — “The righteous shall live by faith”Galatians 3:11Romans 1:17 (thesis statement)Romans 1:16-17’s rendering is already designated in 12_ai_translation_requirements.md as required-identical across ALL documents. Galatians 3:11 MUST reuse that exact wording, word-for-word, not a fresh translation of the same Habakkuk text
3Leviticus 19:18 — “Love your neighbor as yourself”Galatians 5:14Romans 13:9Use one fixed Dogri rendering for both occurrences; do not vary phrasing between the two curricula
4Echo of Psalm 143:2 — “no one/no human being is justified by works of the law”Galatians 2:16Romans 3:20The shared clause must use identical Dogri wording (व्यवस्था दे कम्मां कन्नै कोई बी मनुक्ख धर्मी नईं ठहराइया जाग) in both documents; this is a Critical-risk justification-doctrine clause
5”Abba, Father” (Aramaic formula)Galatians 4:6Romans 8:15Identical phrase required in both: पवित्तर आत्मा…अब्बा, पिता पुकारदी होई
6υἱοθεσία / adoptionGalatians 4:5Romans 8:15, 8:23Use [BASELINE] गोद लैने आह् पुत्तर बनाना identically in both
7”No distinction” universalism (Jew/Gentile; also slave/free, male/female in Galatians)Galatians 3:28Romans 3:22; 10:12The “no distinction before God” doctrinal core must be rendered consistently; Galatians 3:28’s additional pairs (slave/free, male/female) extend but do not alter the underlying “no distinction” formula used in Romans
8Universal accountability under sinGalatians 3:22Romans 3:9, 3:23Retain unqualified “all/everything under sin” language in both; do not soften in either document
9Seed typology — distinct referents, same lexical familyGalatians 3:16, 29 (seed of Abraham = Christ, then believers)Romans 1:3 (seed of David = Christ’s Davidic lineage)Both use वंश but refer to different OT covenant lines (Abrahamic vs. Davidic). Do NOT merge these into a single note; flag each occurrence with its correct covenant referent so translators do not conflate the two promises
10Deity/Sonship of ChristGalatians 1:16; 2:20; 4:4Romans 1:4; 9:5Use [BASELINE] परमेश्वर दा पुत्तर identically; Critical risk in both
11Grace vs. works-of-the-law contrastGalatians 2:16, 21; 3:2-14; 5:4Romans 3:20-28; 4:4-5; 11:5-6Both curricula guard grace (बिना कमाई दित्ती दया) against the same two rejected logics: merit-earning and the Vaishno Devi mannat vow-for-boon economy. Galatians additionally guards against a law-based substitute for grace — flag both threats together wherever Galatians 2-3 material is translated
12Incarnation formulaGalatians 4:4 (“born of woman, born under the law”)Romans has no directly parallel single verse, but shares the same Critical doctrine and forbidden-term ruleApply the identical NEVER अवतार rule from the Romans package; use [BASELINE] मानखे दा रूप लैना
13Resurrection formulaGalatians 1:1Romans 1:4, 4:24, 6:4, 8:11Use [BASELINE] मुर्दघरा चा जिंदा होना identically; never पुनर्जन्म

PART D — Consolidated Rendering-Consistency Rules for Phase 2

  1. Habakkuk 2:4 / Romans 1:17 thesis rule extends to Galatians 3:11. Load the Romans 1:16-17 approved rendering before translating Galatians 3:11; reuse it verbatim for the shared clause.
  2. Genesis 15:6 / Romans 4:3 imputed-righteousness formula extends to Galatians 3:6. No independent retranslation permitted.
  3. Leviticus 19:18 love-command extends identically to Galatians 5:14 and Romans 13:9.
  4. Psalm 143:2 echo (“no one justified by works of the law”) must match between Galatians 2:16 and Romans 3:20.
  5. “Abba, Father” (Galatians 4:6) must match Romans 8:15 exactly, per the baseline’s existing cross-document consistency table.
  6. Seed of Abraham (Galatians 3:16, 29) and Seed of David (Romans 1:3) are distinct covenant lines sharing the lexeme वंश; annotate each occurrence with its specific covenant referent — never treat as interchangeable.
  7. Curse of the law (Galatians 3:10, 13) has no Romans-package precedent and must always be qualified — (व्यवस्था दा) श्राप or (परमेश्वर दा) श्राप — never bare श्राप, to avoid collision with the Baba Jitto folk-curse narrative at the Aghar Jitto shrine.
  8. All doctrines flagged Critical or High anywhere in this matrix inherit the escalation rule from 12_ai_translation_requirements.md: automatic human theologian review, no exceptions, including every direct OT quotation listed in Part A that touches justification, incarnation, resurrection, sonship, or grace.
  9. Vice-list terms shared structurally between Galatians 5:19-21 and Romans 1:29-31 (e.g. idolatry, strife, envy, jealousy) should use one consistent Dogri rendering per item across both curricula, even though neither list is a direct OT quotation.
  10. Narrative character names (Cephas/Peter, James, John, Barnabas, Titus) must be transliterated consistently throughout Galatians and must not be re-rendered differently between chapters 1 and 2.

This document extends, and must be read alongside, 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md. It does not alter any Critical or High risk rendering already fixed in the baseline Romans translation_memory.json.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words