Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis — 1 Corinthians (Portuguese)

Scope and Method

This analysis covers the entire book of 1 Corinthians, chapter 1 through chapter 16, in the original Koine Greek. The core passage, 1 Corinthians 15:1-11 (Paul’s summary of the resurrection gospel), receives verse-by-verse treatment. Every other chapter receives a chapter-level treatment of its load-bearing theological terms using the same fields: original word, transliteration, literal meaning, semantic range, English variants, contextual theological meaning, and destination-language (Portuguese) rendering risk.

Any term already recorded in the baseline Romans translation_memory.json MUST reuse the exact recorded Portuguese rendering and risk tier; this analysis notes reuse explicitly rather than re-deriving a new rendering. New terms introduced by 1 Corinthians follow the same risk-tier logic established in the baseline (Critical/High/Medium/Low), with special attention to two Brazilian-specific collision zones not fully exercised by Romans but heavily exercised by 1 Corinthians:

  1. Kardecist Spiritism — 1 Corinthians 15’s resurrection-body theology and chapter 13’s ethic of love intersect Kardecism’s doctrines of the perispírito (a subtle “fluidic body” surviving death), the soul’s innate immortality, and caridade (charity) as the engine of the spirit’s moral evolution across incarnations — all more sharply engaged here than in Romans.
  2. Afro-Brazilian traditions (Candomblé/Umbanda) — 1 Corinthians 8 and 10’s extended treatment of food sacrificed to idols, and chapters 12-14’s treatment of tongues, prophecy, and spirit-manifestation gifts, intersect comida de santo (food ritually offered to the orixás) and incorporação (spirit possession/channeling) far more directly than anything in Romans.

Part 1: Core Passage Verse-by-Verse — 1 Corinthians 15:1-11

1 Corinthians 15:1

FieldContent
OriginalΓνωρίζω δὲ ὑμῖν, ἀδελφοί, τὸ εὐαγγέλιον ὃ εὐηγγελισάμην ὑμῖν
Term in focusεὐαγγέλιον
Transliterationeuangelion
Literal meaning”good message/announcement”
Semantic rangegood news; an authoritative proclamation of a decisive event, not generic information
English variantsgospel, good news
Contextual theological meaningThe specific apostolic proclamation of Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection “according to the Scriptures,” the foundation of the whole letter’s argument in ch. 15
Portuguese rendering & riskevangelho — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: High). Same Kardecist collision applies: Allan Kardec’s O Evangelho Segundo o Espiritismo reframes “evangelho” as ethical teaching compatible with reincarnation; this passage’s insistence on a bodily, historical resurrection is the sharpest possible rebuttal and must not be softened.

Secondary term in this verse: γνωρίζω (gnōrizō, “I make known / remind”) — Low risk, standard verb of disclosure, no doctrinal collision. Portuguese: anunciar / declarar / lembrar (context-dependent, no glossary entry required).

1 Corinthians 15:2

FieldContent
Originalδι᾽ οὗ καὶ σῴζεσθε, τίνι λόγῳ εὐηγγελισάμην ὑμῖν εἰ κατέχετε, ἐκτὸς εἰ μὴ εἰκῆ ἐπιστεύσατε
Term in focusσῴζεσθε (from σῴζω)
Transliterationsōzesthe (present passive, “you are being saved”)
Literal meaningto be rescued, delivered, kept safe
Semantic rangedeliverance from danger, from death, and — in Pauline usage — from sin’s judgment and its consequences
English variantssaved, are being saved, are receiving salvation
Contextual theological meaningOngoing salvation grounded in the historical gospel event just named; salvation is received and held onto (κατέχετε), not gradually self-achieved
Portuguese rendering & risksalvos / sois salvos (verbal form of salvação) — REUSE baseline Romans TM stem exactly (risk: Critical). This verse’s present-tense “are being saved” must not be read through the Kardecist lens of evolução espiritual accumulated across lifetimes; salvation here is held fast (κατέχετε) on the basis of a completed historical event, not a process of self-improvement whose outcome remains uncertain until some future incarnation.

Secondary term: εἰκῆ (eikē, “in vain / for nothing”) — Low risk, standard adverb; Portuguese em vão.

1 Corinthians 15:3

FieldContent
Originalπαρέδωκα γὰρ ὑμῖν ἐν πρώτοις, ὃ καὶ παρέλαβον, ὅτι Χριστὸς ἀπέθανεν ὑπὲρ τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν ἡμῶν κατὰ τὰς γραφάς
Term in focus (1)παρέδωκα / παρέλαβον (παραδίδωμι / παραλαμβάνω)
Transliterationparedōka / parelabon
Literal meaning”I handed over / I received” — technical language for transmitting fixed tradition
Semantic rangepassing on authoritative, fixed teaching (as opposed to personal opinion or evolving revelation)
English variantsdelivered, passed on, received
Contextual theological meaningPaul is quoting a fixed, pre-existing creedal formula, underscoring that the resurrection gospel is received tradition, not private mystical insight
Portuguese rendering & riskentreguei / recebi — Medium risk. Must be rendered to convey a fixed, once-given deposit of truth, not an evolving revelation. This distinction matters in Brazil because Kardecism claims an ongoing stream of new revelation transmitted through mediums (psicografia); Paul’s language of a closed, once-delivered tradition stands in contrast and should not be flattened into generic “handed on” language that could imply an open-ended revelatory process.
Term in focus (2)ὑπὲρ τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν ἡμῶν
Transliterationhyper tōn hamartiōn hēmōn
Literal meaning”on behalf of / for our sins”
Semantic rangesubstitutionary, vicarious action taken in place of or for the benefit of another
English variantsfor our sins, for the sake of our sins
Contextual theological meaningChrist’s death as a substitutionary payment for sin, not merely a moral example
Portuguese rendering & riskpelos nossos pecados — Critical risk (extends the baseline’s “sin”/pecado and “grace” entries). Kardecism explicitly denies vicarious atonement, teaching that Christ’s death is a supreme moral example, not a payment for another’s guilt, and that each spirit must resolve its own moral debt across successive lives. “ὑπέρ” must retain substitutionary force here (Christ dying in place of, for the sake of sinners), not be softened into “in solidarity with” or “as an example for.”
Term in focus (3)κατὰ τὰς γραφάς
Transliterationkata tas graphas
Literal meaning”according to the Scriptures”
Semantic rangefulfillment of a prior, fixed, written text
English variantsaccording to the Scriptures, as the Scriptures said
Contextual theological meaningOld Testament fulfillment; anchors the gospel in prior revealed Scripture, not new revelation
Portuguese rendering & riskconforme as Escrituras — High risk (ties to baseline “Inspiration of Scripture” doctrine). Must be distinguished from ongoing Kardecist claims of new scripture-like revelation transmitted through mediums; “as Escrituras” here refers to the closed Old Testament canon, a once-given fixed text.

1 Corinthians 15:4

FieldContent
Originalκαὶ ὅτι ἐτάφη, καὶ ὅτι ἐγήγερται τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρᾳ κατὰ τὰς γραφάς
Term in focus (1)ἐτάφη (θάπτω)
Transliterationetaphē
Literal meaning”he was buried”
Semantic rangephysical interment of a corpse
English variantswas buried, was entombed
Contextual theological meaningEstablishes the genuine physical death of Jesus, the necessary premise for a genuine bodily resurrection
Portuguese rendering & riskfoi sepultado — Medium risk. Confirms real, historical death (not apparent death or a temporary “descent” of a spirit), which matters because some popular esoteric retellings of Jesus’ story minimize his actual death.
Term in focus (2)ἐγήγερται (ἐγείρω, perfect passive)
Transliterationegēgertai
Literal meaning”he has been raised” (perfect tense: a past act with continuing present effect)
Semantic rangebodily rising from death to renewed life, with permanent, ongoing significance
English variantshas been raised, was raised, rose
Contextual theological meaningTHE central claim of the passage and of the whole chapter: Christ’s bodily, historical, one-time resurrection, whose reality and consequences persist to the present (perfect tense)
Portuguese rendering & riskressuscitou / foi ressuscitado (from ressurreição) — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: Critical). NEVER “reencarnou” or any construction implying rebirth into a new body for a new life-cycle. The perfect tense’s “abiding result” nuance should, where the target sentence structure allows, be preserved by phrasing that signals a completed-but-still-effective event (e.g., “ressuscitou e vive,” “ressuscitou dos mortos”) rather than a bare simple past that could read as a single detached historical fact disconnected from present significance — this distinction is doctrinally important because Kardecist reincarnation is precisely a repeatable cycle with no single decisive, ongoing-effect event.
Term in focus (3)τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρᾳ
Transliterationtē tritē hēmera
Literal meaning”on the third day”
Semantic rangea specific, historically anchored time reference
English variantson the third day, the third day
Contextual theological meaningHistorical specificity underscoring a real, dated event, not a timeless myth or repeatable cycle
Portuguese rendering & riskao terceiro dia — Low risk, standard.

1 Corinthians 15:5

FieldContent
Originalκαὶ ὅτι ὤφθη Κηφᾷ, εἶτα τοῖς δώδεκα
Term in focusὤφθη (ὁράω, aorist passive)
Transliterationōphthē
Literal meaning”he was seen / he appeared”
Semantic rangea real, objective, visible appearance to witnesses (not a purely inward vision or dream)
English variantsappeared, was seen, showed himself
Contextual theological meaningThe risen Christ was physically visible to named, identifiable witnesses — evidentiary, verifiable appearances underpinning the historical claim of v.4
Portuguese rendering & riskapareceu — High risk. Must be carefully distinguished from Kardecist and mediumistic vocabulary for “apparitions” of discarnate spirits perceived by mediums (a mainstream Brazilian religious category). The text’s point is a real, embodied appearance witnessed by named people in ordinary sight, not a mediumistic vision or spiritual manifestation perceived only by a sensitive medium. A translator note is recommended wherever this verb recurs in vv.5-8.

Proper name: Κηφᾷ (Kēpha, “Cephas,” Peter’s Aramaic name) — reuse established Portuguese Bible form Cefas. Low risk. τοῖς δώδεκα (“the Twelve”) — standard, os doze, Low risk.

1 Corinthians 15:6

FieldContent
Originalἔπειτα ὤφθη ἐπάνω πεντακοσίοις ἀδελφοῖς ἐφάπαξ, ἐξ ὧν οἱ πλείονες μένουσιν ἕως ἄρτι, τινὲς δὲ ἐκοιμήθησαν
Term in focus (1)ἐφάπαξ
Transliterationephapax
Literal meaning”at one time, once for all”
Semantic rangea single, unrepeated, simultaneous occurrence
English variantsat one time, all at once
Contextual theological meaningReinforces the singular, non-repeatable nature of the resurrection appearance event, mirroring Christ’s own once-for-all resurrection
Portuguese rendering & riskde uma só vez — Medium risk; the “once for all” nuance should not be lost, since repeatability (of appearances, of lives, of incarnations) is exactly what Kardecism affirms and this text denies.
Term in focus (2)ἐκοιμήθησαν (κοιμάομαι)
Transliterationekoimēthēsan
Literal meaning”they fell asleep”
Semantic rangea euphemism for death used specifically of believers, implying a temporary state pending resurrection, not annihilation and not ongoing conscious existence elsewhere as a discarnate spirit
English variantsfell asleep, died
Contextual theological meaningDeath is described as “sleep” precisely because a future bodily awakening (resurrection) is certain — the metaphor depends entirely on ch.15’s resurrection argument
Portuguese rendering & riskdormiram / adormeceram (na morte) — High risk. This is a genuine Brazilian-context collision: Kardecism also uses “sleep” and “awakening” imagery for the passage of a spirit from the physical body to the spirit world between incarnations. The Christian sense here — a body will be bodily raised, not merely a spirit continuing on and eventually re-embodying — must be safeguarded, ideally with a translator/teaching note distinguishing “sleep until the resurrection” from “the spirit’s transition to the spirit world before its next incarnation.”

1 Corinthians 15:7

FieldContent
Originalἔπειτα ὤφθη Ἰακώβῳ, εἶτα τοῖς ἀποστόλοις πᾶσιν
TermsἸακώβῳ (James — proper name, standard Tiago, Low risk); ὤφθη (see v.5); ἀπόστολοις (apóstolos — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly, Low risk, unambiguous term).
Contextual theological meaningExtends the roll call of eyewitnesses to include named, known, still-living leaders of the Jerusalem church (implicitly verifiable by Paul’s readers)

1 Corinthians 15:8

FieldContent
Originalἔσχατον δὲ πάντων ὥσπερ τῷ ἐκτρώματι ὤφθη κἀμοί
Term in focusἔκτρωμα
Transliterationektrōma
Literal meaning”miscarried/stillborn child; one born untimely or abnormally”
Semantic rangea term of self-deprecation expressing unworthiness and unexpectedness of Paul’s own apostolic calling
English variantsone born at the wrong time, one untimely born, an aborted birth
Contextual theological meaningPaul’s own resurrection encounter (Acts 9) as the last and most unlikely of the apostolic appearances, grounding his apostleship in grace, not personal merit
Portuguese rendering & riskum abortivo / alguém nascido fora de tempo — Medium risk. Requires care to preserve Paul’s tone of humble self-abasement rather than an obscure or clinical-sounding term; established Portuguese Bible versions typically render this with some variation of “aborto” or “algo fora do tempo natural.” No major doctrinal collision, but obscure vocabulary risks reader confusion; a brief gloss is advisable.

1 Corinthians 15:9

FieldContent
OriginalἘγὼ γάρ εἰμι ὁ ἐλάχιστος τῶν ἀποστόλων, ὃς οὐκ εἰμὶ ἱκανὸς καλεῖσθαι ἀπόστολος, διότι ἐδίωξα τὴν ἐκκλησίαν τοῦ θεοῦ
Term in focus (1)ἐλάχιστος
Transliterationelachistos
Literal meaning”least, smallest” (superlative)
Semantic rangelowest in rank or worth
English variantsleast, the very least
Contextual theological meaningPaul’s self-assessment as unworthy of the apostolic title, setting up v.10’s “grace of God” as the true explanation for his standing
Portuguese rendering & risko menor / o mínimo — Low risk, standard.
Term in focus (2)ἐκκλησία
Transliterationekklēsia
Literal meaning”assembly, called-out gathering”
Semantic rangethe gathered community of believers, local or universal
English variantschurch, assembly, congregation
Contextual theological meaningThe community Paul once persecuted before his conversion — grounding grace as undeserved favor toward a former enemy of the church
Portuguese rendering & riskigreja — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: Medium). Distinguish from the capitalized institutional sense foregrounded in Catholic usage, per baseline note.
Term in focus (3)ἐδίωξα (διώκω)
Transliterationediōxa
Literal meaning”I persecuted”
Contextual theological meaningPaul’s pre-conversion hostility to the church, contrasted with his subsequent apostleship purely by grace
Portuguese rendering & riskpersegui — Low risk, standard historical statement.

1 Corinthians 15:10

FieldContent
Originalχάριτι δὲ θεοῦ εἰμι ὅ εἰμι, καὶ ἡ χάρις αὐτοῦ ἡ εἰς ἐμὲ οὐ κενὴ ἐγενήθη, ἀλλὰ περισσότερον αὐτῶν πάντων ἐκοπίασα, οὐκ ἐγὼ δὲ ἀλλὰ ἡ χάρις τοῦ θεοῦ [ἡ] σὺν ἐμοί
Term in focus (1)χάρις
Transliterationcharis
Literal meaning”grace, favor, gift”
Semantic rangeunmerited favor, freely given, the basis of standing and empowerment
English variantsgrace
Contextual theological meaningThe sole explanation for Paul’s transformation from persecutor to apostle and for his subsequent labor — grace both grants standing AND empowers effective work, but the labor itself does not generate or increase the grace
Portuguese rendering & riskgraça — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: High). This verse is a key text for the grace-versus-merit contrast: Paul’s labor (“ἐκοπίασα,” I labored) is emphatically the result of grace, not its cause, which must be rendered so as to foreclose any reading where diligent effort is what earns or increases standing before God — precisely the logic Kardecism applies to a spirit’s moral effort accumulating merit across incarnations.
Term in focus (2)ἐκοπίασα (κοπιάω)
Transliterationekopiasa
Literal meaning”I labored, I toiled to exhaustion”
Semantic rangestrenuous, wearying effort
English variantslabored, worked hard, toiled
Contextual theological meaningPaul’s real, strenuous ministry effort — genuine effort exists and matters, but it flows from grace already given, not the reverse
Portuguese rendering & risktrabalhei arduamente / labutei — Medium risk; care should be taken that the grammar of the sentence (labor as consequence of grace, “grace … with me” doing the work) is not reversed in translation into effort as the cause of favor.

1 Corinthians 15:11

FieldContent
Originalεἴτε οὖν ἐγὼ εἴτε ἐκεῖνοι, οὕτως κηρύσσομεν καὶ οὕτως ἐπιστεύσατε
Term in focus (1)κηρύσσομεν (κηρύσσω)
Transliterationkēryssomen
Literal meaning”we proclaim, we herald”
Semantic rangeauthoritative public announcement, as by a herald with delegated authority
English variantspreach, proclaim, announce
Contextual theological meaningThe unified apostolic proclamation of the one gospel just summarized (vv.3-8), regardless of which apostle speaks
Portuguese rendering & riskpregamos / proclamamos — Medium risk, standard, but should retain the sense of authoritative heralding rather than casual sharing of opinion, since this reinforces the fixed, received nature of the message (cf. v.3 παρέδωκα).
Term in focus (2)ἐπιστεύσατε (πιστεύω)
Transliterationepisteusate
Literal meaning”you believed”
Semantic rangepersonal trust and reliance placed in a specific claim/person
English variantsbelieved, trusted, put faith in
Contextual theological meaningThe Corinthians’ faith response to this specific, fixed apostolic gospel, not generic religious belief
Portuguese rendering & riskcrestes (from fé/crer) — extends baseline Romans TM “faith” entry exactly (risk: High). The object of belief must remain recoverable as the resurrection gospel just summarized, not generic belief in “the spirit world” or in one’s own moral progress, per the baseline’s existing caution on “fé.”

Part 2: Chapter-by-Chapter Study of the Whole Book

Chapter 1 — Factionalism, the Cross, and the Wisdom of God

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
σχίσμα (1:10)schisma”tear, split”division, faction within a groupdivisions, quarrelsRival factions within the Corinthian church loyal to different leaders (Paul, Apollos, Cephas), undermining gospel unitydivisões — Medium risk. No major syncretism collision, but doctrinally central to the curriculum’s “Christian Unity versus Factionalism” theme; must be distinguished from mere stylistic disagreement — this is a threat to gospel unity itself.
σταυρός (1:17-18)stauros”stake, cross” (instrument of Roman execution)the literal instrument of crucifixion; by extension, the message of Christ’s atoning deaththe cross, crucifixionThe central saving event and message, foolishness to unbelievers but the very power of God to those being savedcruz — NEW entry, Critical risk. Directly ties to the baseline’s “Grace” and “Salvation” cautions: Kardecism explicitly denies substitutionary atonement, framing Christ’s death as a supreme moral example within his own long spiritual evolution rather than a unique, sufficient payment for sin. “A cruz” as “the power of God for salvation” must retain its sufficiency and finality, not be softened into “an inspiring example of self-sacrifice.”
μωρία (1:18, 23, 25)mōria”foolishness, folly”that which appears foolish or irrational by worldly standardsfoolishness, follyThe gospel’s apparent foolishness to Greek philosophical wisdom and Jewish sign-seeking, which is in fact God’s wisdom and powerloucura — NEW entry, High risk. In Brazil, both Kardecism (which presents itself as a rational, “scientific” philosophy superior to “old religious dogma”) and educated skepticism can frame the cross’s message as irrational superstition in a way structurally similar to 1:18-25’s Greek objection; teaching must retain the passage’s own reversal — this “loucura” is in fact wisdom and power — without collapsing into anti-intellectualism.
σοφία (1:17-30)sophia”wisdom”skill, insight, understanding; here contrasted between worldly philosophical wisdom and God’s wisdom revealed in the crosswisdomGod’s wisdom, hidden from and contradicting worldly wisdom, is revealed and enacted in the crucified Christsabedoria — NEW entry, High risk. See Chapter 2 note below; the term recurs heavily through chs. 1-3 and must be handled consistently as “wisdom of God” (revealed in the cross) versus “wisdom of this age” (worldly/philosophical), not conflated with esoteric “sabedoria” claims common to Spiritist and other esoteric movements in Brazil that promise superior hidden knowledge.
κλητός (1:1-2, 24)klētos”called”summoned by GodcalledPaul’s apostolic calling and the Corinthians’ calling to be saints, and the “called” who perceive Christ as God’s wisdom and powerchamado — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: High).
ἅγιοι (1:2)hagioi”holy ones”corporate designation for all believerssaintsThe Corinthian believers, called to be holy, addressed as “santos” alongside believers everywheresantos — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: Critical). Requires the same explanatory note as in Romans 1:7: every believer, not only canonized figures venerated in popular Catholic piety, is called “santo” here.
χάρις (1:3-4)charis”grace”unmerited favorgraceStandard Pauline greeting and thanksgiving formulagraça — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: High).
μαρτύριον / κοινωνία (1:6, 9)martyrion / koinōnia”testimony” / “fellowship, participation”confirmed testimony about Christ; shared participation with Christ’s Sontestimony; fellowshipThe Corinthians’ confirmed testimony to Christ and their calling into fellowship with God’s Sonκοινωνία: companheirismo in the general fellowship sense — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: Low), but see Chapter 10 note below for the distinct Lord’s Supper sense of κοινωνία, which requires comunhão instead.

Chapter 2 — The Spirit-Revealed Wisdom of God

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
σοφία τοῦ θεοῦ / σοφία τοῦ κόσμου (2:1-13)sophia tou theou / sophia tou kosmou”wisdom of God” / “wisdom of the world”God’s hidden redemptive plan, revealed only by the Spirit, versus human philosophical reasoningGod’s wisdom / worldly wisdomPaul deliberately preached “Christ crucified” rather than persuasive rhetoric, because the gospel’s content is revealed by the Spirit, not discovered by unaided human reasonsabedoria de Deus / sabedoria do mundo — extends the Chapter 1 “sabedoria” entry (risk: High). This chapter’s claim that true wisdom is Spirit-revealed, not humanly discovered, must not be read as endorsing a Kardecist-style claim to superior “spiritual knowledge” accessed through mediumistic or esoteric means; the Spirit who reveals wisdom here is the same Holy Spirit the baseline package already distinguishes sharply from “espíritos guias” and orixás.
πνευματικός / ψυχικός (2:14-15)pneumatikos / psychikos”spiritual” / “soulish, natural”a person indwelt by and responsive to God’s Spirit, versus a person operating only by natural human capacityspiritual person / natural personOnly the Spirit-indwelt believer can rightly discern spiritual truth; the “natural” person cannotespiritual / natural — NEW entry, High risk. “Homem espiritual” here refers exclusively to Spirit-indwelt discernment of revealed truth, not to a Kardecist “espírita” or “sensitivo” with heightened mediumistic perception of the spirit world; explicit teaching contrast is warranted given how commonly “ser espiritual” functions as a self-description in Brazilian Spiritist and syncretistic contexts.
νοῦς Χριστοῦ (2:16)nous Christou”mind of Christ”Christ’s own perspective and thinking, given to believers by the Spiritmind of ChristBelievers possess Christ’s mind through the indwelling Spirit, in contrast to the wisdom of worldly rulersmente de Cristo — Medium risk, standard rendering, low collision risk beyond the general spiritual/natural contrast above.
μυστήριον (2:1, 7)mystērion”mystery, secret”a previously hidden divine plan, now revealed in the gospelmysteryGod’s redemptive wisdom, hidden in past ages, now disclosed through the crucified and glorified Christmistério — NEW entry, Medium/High risk. Must be distinguished from the popular Brazilian usage of “mistérios” for occult or esoteric hidden knowledge (astrology, Kardecist “mistérios espirituais,” Umbanda ritual secrets); Paul’s “mystery” is a once-hidden but now openly proclaimed truth, not an esoteric teaching reserved for initiates.

Chapter 3 — Divisions, Building on Christ, and the Temple of God

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
σαρκικός (3:1, 3)sarkikos”fleshly, of the flesh”living according to unredeemed human nature, immaturecarnal, fleshlyThe Corinthians’ factionalism as evidence of spiritual immaturity, not Spirit-directed maturitycarnal — Medium risk, standard theological vocabulary, no significant syncretism collision.
θεμέλιος / οἰκοδομή (3:10-14)themelios / oikodomē”foundation” / “building, building up”the foundation of a structure (Christ) and the ongoing work built upon itfoundation, building, building upChrist alone is the only legitimate foundation; ministry work will be tested by fire on the day of judgmentfundamento / edificação — Medium risk; edificação also recurs as a key term in ch.14 (edification of the church in worship) and should be rendered consistently across both contexts.
ναὸς θεοῦ (3:16-17)naos theou”temple of God”the sacred dwelling place of God’s presencetemple of GodThe corporate church (here) is God’s temple, indwelt by the Spirit; defiling it invites judgmenttemplo de Deus — NEW entry, High risk. See the fuller treatment under Chapter 6 (body as temple, individual sense); here the corporate sense should be kept distinct but consistent in vocabulary. Both senses must guard against confusion with practices in which the human body is understood as a vessel entered and used by spirits (Umbanda/Candomblé incorporação, Kardecist mediumship), since God’s temple in Paul’s sense is exclusively and permanently indwelt by the Holy Spirit, not a vessel periodically entered by various spirits.
σοφία τοῦ κόσμου (3:19)sophia tou kosmou”wisdom of the world”see Chapter 1-2worldly wisdomReiterates the ch.1-2 themesabedoria do mundo — reuse Chapter 1-2 entry.

Chapter 4 — Stewards of the Mysteries, Apostolic Suffering

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
ὑπηρέτης / οἰκονόμος (4:1)hypēretēs / oikonomos”servant/assistant” / “household manager, steward”a subordinate entrusted with managing another’s property or affairsservants, stewardsPaul and the apostles as servants of Christ entrusted with managing God’s mysteries, accountable to Christ alone, not to factional human approvalservos / mordomos — NEW entry, Medium risk, standard theological vocabulary; the accountability-to-Christ-alone emphasis should be preserved against any reading that makes apostolic authority a matter of popular factional endorsement.
μυστήριον (4:1)mystērionsee Chapter 2The gospel entrusted to apostolic stewardsmistérios — reuse Chapter 2 entry (Medium/High risk).
μωρὸς διὰ Χριστόν (4:10)mōros dia Christon”a fool for Christ’s sake”willing self-abasement for the gospel’s sakefools for ChristIronic self-description contrasting apostolic suffering with the Corinthians’ self-satisfied “wisdom”loucos por causa de Cristo — reuse Chapter 1 “loucura” entry (High risk), applied here to voluntary gospel-motivated self-abasement rather than the message of the cross itself; keep vocabulary consistent.

Chapter 5 — Church Discipline and the Removal of Immorality

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
πορνεία (5:1)porneia”sexual immorality”any sexual activity outside the boundaries God has established, here specifically incestsexual immorality, fornicationA specific, named case of sexual sin tolerated by the church, requiring decisive disciplineimoralidade sexual — NEW entry, High risk. Distinct from the baseline’s generic “pecado” (sin) entry; must retain moral seriousness before a holy God without either prudish vagueness or reductive euphemism, given wide variance in how directly Brazilian pastoral culture discusses sexual sin from the pulpit.
ζύμη (5:6-8)zymē”leaven, yeast”a small corrupting agent that spreads through the wholeleaven, yeastTolerated sin spreads corruption through the whole church, as leaven spreads through dough; believers are to be an “unleavened” (pure) communityfermento — NEW entry, Low/Medium risk, standard Passover-rooted metaphor; requires brief Old Testament background (Passover/unleavened bread) for full comprehension, similar to the baseline’s note on OT literacy gaps.
πάσχα (5:7)pascha”Passover”the Passover feast, and by typology, Christ himself as the Passover lambPassoverChrist as the true Passover lamb, whose sacrifice grounds the call to communal purityPáscoa / Cordeiro pascal — Medium risk, requires OT background note (Exodus imagery); no syncretism collision.
παραδοῦναι τῷ Σατανᾷ (5:5)paradounai tō Satana”to hand over to Satan”formal exclusion from the protected fellowship of the church, exposing the offender to the world’s/Satan’s sphere for corrective purposesdeliver/hand over to SatanSevere church discipline aimed at ultimate restoration, not vindictive punishmententregar a Satanás — High risk. Requires careful teaching framing (redemptive intent: “para que o espírito seja salvo” v.5) to avoid either trivializing church discipline or making it sound punitive/magical, distinct from any folk-magical “handing over” or curse practice sometimes assumed in popular religiosity.

Chapter 6 — Lawsuits, the Body as Temple, and Sexual Holiness

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
ἅγιοι (6:1-2)hagioisee Chapter 1saintsBelievers taking fellow believers (“saints”) to secular courts, a scandal given their identitysantos — reuse (Critical, same note as Chapter 1).
ἀπολούω / ἁγιάζω / δικαιόω (6:11)apolouō / hagiazō / dikaioō”washed” / “sanctified” / “justified”cleansing, consecration, and forensic acquittal — three distinct but related aspects of conversionwashed, sanctified, justifiedA triad summarizing the totality of the Corinthians’ transformation from their former sinful life, “in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God”lavados / santificados / justificados — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly for santificação (High) and justificação (Critical). “Lavados” is a new but low-risk term (ritual/moral cleansing imagery, standard).
ναὸς τοῦ ἁγίου πνεύματος (6:19)naos tou hagiou pneumatos”temple of the Holy Spirit”the individual believer’s body as the sacred dwelling place of God’s Spirittemple of the Holy SpiritEach believer’s physical body is exclusively indwelt by the Holy Spirit and therefore must be honored, not defiled through sexual immoralitytemplo do Espírito Santo — Critical risk. This is one of the sharpest Brazilian-specific collisions in the whole epistle: the idea of the body as a dwelling/vessel for a spirit closely parallels the language of Kardecist mediumship and, especially, Candomblé/Umbanda incorporação, in which a human body is a vessel entered and used by an orixá, guide, or discarnate spirit during ritual trance. Paul’s teaching must be taught as the exclusive, permanent, non-alternating indwelling of the one Holy Spirit — never as one instance of a general human capacity for spirit-vessel use that could, in another context, admit other spirits. This term requires the same explicit-contrast teaching note the baseline mandates for “Holy Spirit” itself.
ἠγοράσθητε τιμῆς (6:20)ēgorasthēte timēs”you were bought with a price”purchase/redemption through paymentbought with a priceBelievers belong to God because Christ purchased them at the cost of his own death — grounding the call to bodily holinessfostes comprados por preço — High risk; ties to the “grace”/“salvation” collision: this redemption is a completed transaction accomplished by Christ, not a debt the believer works off through personal effort across time (or lifetimes).

Chapter 7 — Marriage, Singleness, and the Christian’s Calling

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
γάμος (7:2, 9, etc.)gamos”marriage”the marital unionmarriageA legitimate, honorable calling for most believers, protecting against sexual immorality and providing companionshipcasamento — NEW entry, Medium risk, standard vocabulary; note pastoral sensitivity given wide variance of marriage theology across Catholic (sacramental, indissoluble), Evangelical, and secular Brazilian frameworks — no syncretism collision, but framing should avoid overstating either marriage’s necessity or its sacramental status beyond what the text supports.
παρθένος (7:25-38)parthenos”virgin”an unmarried person, specifically one who has not engaged in sexual relationsvirgin, unmarried personPaul’s teaching on the goodness of remaining unmarried “as I am,” for undivided devotion to the Lordvirgem — NEW entry, Medium risk, standard vocabulary; distinguish Paul’s practical, undivided-devotion rationale from the specifically Catholic category of consecrated virginity as a higher spiritual state, a distinction analogous to the baseline’s caution about “vocação” narrowing to consecrated religious life.
κλῆσις (7:17-24)klēsis”calling”one’s state or circumstance in which God has called a person, and God’s effectual summons itselfcalling, calling in lifeGod’s sovereign call meets a person in their existing life circumstance (married/unmarried, free/slave); a stable principle: “remain in the condition in which you were called”chamado — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: High); note the specific added nuance here of “calling” as one’s providentially assigned life-situation, in addition to the salvation-calling sense already documented in the baseline.
ἁγιάζω (7:14)hagiazō”to sanctify, make holy”to set apart in a derivative, relational sense here (the unbelieving spouse “sanctified” through the believing spouse)sanctifiedA difficult, debated verse: the unbelieving spouse and children of a mixed marriage are in some sense set apart/blessed through the believing spouse’s presence, not personally saved by itsantificado(a) — REUSE baseline Romans TM stem (risk: High). Requires a teaching note clarifying this is not personal salvation of the unbelieving spouse, to avoid confusion with either the Catholic sacramental category of marriage conferring grace, or a Kardecist reading of one spirit’s moral progress benefiting another’s karmic account.

Chapter 8 — Idol Meat, Knowledge, and Love

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
εἰδωλόθυτα (8:1, 4, 7, 10)eidōlothyta”things sacrificed to idols”meat that has been ritually offered to a pagan deity before being sold or eatenfood sacrificed to idols, idol meatThe Corinthians’ dispute over whether believers may eat meat previously offered to idols — a matter of conscience, not of the food’s inherent spiritual contamination, but with real risk of leading weaker believers into actual idol worshipcarne sacrificada a ídolos / comida sacrificada a ídolos — NEW entry, CRITICAL risk. This is among the most direct real-world collisions in the entire epistle for a Brazilian audience: Candomblé and Umbanda practice includes offering and sharing comida de santo (food ritually consecrated and offered to the orixás), and questions of whether/how a Christian may interact with such food, spaces, or social contexts are a live, practical pastoral issue, not a merely historical curiosity. Teaching on this chapter must engage the real contemporary Brazilian parallel directly, neither trivializing it as an irrelevant first-century custom nor treating all contact with any food as automatically contaminating; Paul’s own resolution (the food itself has no independent power, but love and conscience toward others must govern behavior) should be taught with explicit reference to the Brazilian religious landscape.
γνῶσις (8:1-2, 7, 10-11)gnōsis”knowledge”intellectual understanding, here specifically theological knowledge that “idols are nothing”knowledgeCorrect theological knowledge that idols have no real power, which nonetheless “puffs up” and can be wielded without love, harming weaker believersconhecimento — Medium risk; must be paired with the chapter’s insistence that knowledge without love is destructive — ties directly into the ch.13 love theme.
συνείδησις (8:7, 10, 12)syneidēsis”conscience”the inner moral faculty that approves or condemns one’s own actionsconscienceA weaker believer’s conscience, still sensitive to the association with idolatry, must be protected by the stronger believer’s voluntary restraintconsciência — NEW entry, Medium risk, standard vocabulary; no major syncretism collision, but central to the “Christian Liberty” doctrine and must be kept terminologically distinct from “knowledge” (γνῶσις) and “liberty” (ἐλευθερία) though all three interact in this chapter.
ἐλευθερία / ἐξουσία (8:9; cf. 9:1, 10:23)eleutheria / exousia”freedom” / “right, authority”the believer’s genuine freedom in Christ from ritual food restrictions, and the “right” this freedom grantsliberty, freedom, rightGenuine Christian liberty exists but must be voluntarily limited out of love, so as not to become a “stumbling block” (πρόσκομμα) to weaker believersliberdade / direito — NEW entry, High risk. Central to the “Christian Liberty and Idol Meat” doctrine; must be taught as freedom exercised within love’s limits, not as an absolute personal right, and distinguished from any framing that would read Christian liberty as compatible with participation in explicitly idolatrous ritual contexts.
πρόσκομμα / σκάνδαλον (8:9, 13)proskomma / skandalon”stumbling block, obstacle”something that causes another to fall into sin or away from faithstumbling block, occasion to stumbleThe stronger believer’s responsibility not to let their exercised liberty cause a weaker believer’s spiritual harmtropeço / escândalo — Medium risk, standard vocabulary.

Chapter 9 — Apostolic Rights and Self-Discipline for the Gospel

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
εὐαγγέλιον (9:12, 14, 16-18, 23)euangelionsee core passagegospelPaul’s voluntary surrender of legitimate rights (to material support) so as not to hinder the gospel’s advanceevangelho — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: High).
ἀγών / τρέχω (9:24-26)agōn / trechō”contest, race” / “to run”athletic competition imagery for disciplined Christian effortrace, runBelievers are to run the Christian life with the same disciplined intensity as an athlete competing for a prizecorrida / correr — NEW entry, Low/Medium risk, standard athletic metaphor; note the imagery of disciplined effort must not be misread as implying salvation itself is won by the running, since Paul’s own point is self-discipline in ministry service, not the ground of justification (kept distinct from the baseline’s grace/works cautions).
στέφανος ἄφθαρτος (9:25)stephanos aphthartos”imperishable/incorruptible crown”a victor’s wreath that does not fade or decay, unlike an athlete’s laurel crownimperishable crown, incorruptible wreathThe eternal, non-fading reward of faithful service, contrasted with temporary athletic prizescoroa incorruptível — High risk. First occurrence in the book of the ἄφθαρτος/incorruptibility word-group, which recurs with much greater doctrinal weight in Chapter 15 (see below); keep vocabulary for “incorruptível/incorruptibilidade” fully consistent across both chapters.
ἐγκράτεια (9:25)egkrateia”self-control”mastery over one’s own body and impulsesself-control, disciplineAthletic self-discipline as a model for ministry self-disciplinedomínio próprio — Low risk, standard vocabulary.

Chapter 10 — Idolatry, the Table of the Lord, and Christian Freedom

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
εἰδωλολατρία / εἴδωλα (10:7, 14, 19-20)eidōlolatria / eidōla”idolatry” / “idols”worship directed toward false gods/imagesidolatry, idolsWarning against Israel’s wilderness idolatry as a pattern to avoid; idol feasts involve real spiritual danger (“what pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons,” v.20)idolatria / ídolos — NEW entry, Critical risk. Directly continues the ch.8 collision but sharpens it: Paul states that behind idol worship stand real “demons” (δαιμόνια), not merely inert statues — an important corrective against a purely rationalist reading (“idols are just powerless objects, so any association is harmless”). In the Brazilian context this must be taught carefully: the passage affirms both that idols/orixás have no independent divine legitimacy AND that participation in their worship is spiritually dangerous, not neutral — a nuanced position requiring careful, non-dismissive, non-alarmist teaching given Candomblé/Umbanda’s mainstream cultural presence.
τράπεζα κυρίου / ποτήριον κυρίου (10:21)trapeza kyriou / potērion kyriou”table of the Lord” / “cup of the Lord”the Lord’s Supper meal and cup, in exclusive contrast to “the table of demons”the Lord’s table / the Lord’s cupSharing the Lord’s Supper creates a real spiritual participation that is incompatible with also sharing in idol feastsmesa do Senhor / cálice do Senhor — Critical risk; first explicit Lord’s Supper vocabulary in the book (fuller treatment in ch.11), directly juxtaposed here against idol-feast participation — the exclusivity claim (“you cannot have both”) must be preserved without softening.
κοινωνία (10:16-18)koinōnia”communion, participation, fellowship”shared, real participation in the body and blood of Christ (v.16), and by contrast, in idol sacrifices (v.18, 20)communion, participation, fellowshipEating the Lord’s Supper is a real spiritual participation (“communion”) in Christ’s body and blood, not a merely symbolic social mealcomunhão — NEW entry (context-specific sense), Critical risk. This is an important terminological refinement to the baseline: Romans’ general “fellowship” sense of κοινωνία is rendered companheirismo per the baseline TM, and that should continue for general fellowship contexts. However, in the specific Lord’s Supper sense here and in Chapter 11, established Portuguese Bible tradition (Catholic and Protestant alike, following Almeida) renders κοινωνία as comunhão — “comunhão do sangue de Cristo,” “comunhão do corpo de Cristo.” This is NOT the same as the baseline’s rejected “comunhão dos santos” creedal phrase (which remains excluded), but IS the correct, standard, and required rendering for κοινωνία specifically in Lord’s Supper contexts. Both senses of κοινωνία (general fellowship = companheirismo; Lord’s Supper participation = comunhão) must be kept terminologically distinct and consistently applied throughout 1 Corinthians.
πάντα εἰς δόξαν θεοῦ (10:31)panta eis doxan theou”all things to the glory of God”the governing principle for all disputable practices (food, drink, any action)do all to the glory of GodThe chapter’s summary ethic for navigating Christian liberty questionstudo para a glória de Deus — reuse baseline “glory”/glória entry (Medium risk).

Chapter 11 — Order in Worship and the Lord’s Supper

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
κεφαλή (11:3-10)kephalē”head”both the literal body part and a metaphor for authority/source relationshiphead, headshipA disputed passage on relational order between Christ, man, and woman in worship, expressed partly through head-covering customcabeça — NEW entry, Medium/High risk. Sensitive across the whole spectrum of contemporary Brazilian church traditions (Catholic, mainline Protestant, Evangelical, Pentecostal) with differing views on gender roles in worship; render literally and let doctrine notes carry the interpretive weight rather than resolving the debate in the translation itself.
κατακαλύπτω / κάλυμμα (11:4-15)katakalyptō / kalymma”to cover” / “covering, veil”head-covering practice in worshipveil, coveringContested cultural-theological instruction on head coverings during prayer/prophecy, tied to the honor/shame conventions of the original settingcobrir / velo — Medium risk; requires careful framing given how differently this passage is received/practiced across Brazilian church traditions (from unremarked to strictly practiced), and should avoid imposing a single resolution not clearly settled by exegesis.
κυριακὸν δεῖπνον (11:20)kyriakon deipnon”the Lord’s Supper”the church’s shared commemorative meal instituted by Christthe Lord’s SupperThe proper name for the ordinance itself, introduced explicitly here for the first time in the bookCeia do Senhor — NEW entry, Critical risk. The central term for the entire “Lord’s Supper” curriculum doctrine. Portuguese Christian tradition (Catholic “Eucaristia/Santa Ceia,” Protestant “Ceia do Senhor/Santa Ceia”) already carries the Trent-era Catholic/Protestant transubstantiation-versus-memorial tension documented in other Language Packages in this pipeline; in the Brazilian context this tension is compounded by the general body/spirit-vessel collision already flagged for ch.6 and ch.3’s temple language. Must be taught with clear reference to Christ’s own words of institution (11:23-25) without importing either a magical/quasi-mediumistic framing of “receiving a spirit” or an entirely memorial-only framing that would flatten the “discerning the body” warning in v.29.
σῶμα καὶ αἷμα (11:24-27)sōma kai haima”body and blood”Christ’s body and blood, given in the bread and cup of the Supperbody and bloodThe words of institution; “This is my body… this cup is the new covenant in my blood”corpo e sangue — Critical risk, same considerations as κυριακὸν δεῖπνον above.
διακρίνων τὸ σῶμα (11:29)diakrinōn to sōma”discerning/distinguishing the body”rightly recognizing the significance of Christ’s body in the Supper, as opposed to careless, irreverent participationdiscerning the bodyFailure to discern the body brings judgment (sickness, even death, vv.29-30) upon the unworthy participantdiscernir o corpo — High risk; requires careful, non-alarmist pastoral framing while preserving the passage’s real seriousness about right-hearted participation in the Supper.

Chapter 12 — Spiritual Gifts and the One Body

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
χαρίσματα (12:4, 9, 28, 30-31)charismata”grace-gifts”Spirit-given enablements distributed for the common good of the churchspiritual giftsThe diverse gifts distributed by the one Spirit for building up the one body, not for status competitiondons espirituais — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: High). The baseline’s caution against conflation with Kardecist mediunidade and Candomblé/Umbanda “dons de incorporação” is even more directly load-bearing here than in Romans 12:6-8, since 1 Corinthians 12-14 gives the fullest New Testament treatment of these gifts, including tongues and prophecy specifically (see below).
πνεῦμα ἅγιον (12:3-13)pneuma hagion”Holy Spirit”the personal third Person of the Trinity, the sole source of legitimate spiritual giftsHoly Spirit”No one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except by the Holy Spirit”; one Spirit distributing many gifts to one bodyEspírito Santo — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: Critical).
γλῶσσαι (12:10, 28, 30)glōssai”tongues”Spirit-given utterance in unlearned languages or ecstatic Spirit-given speech, requiring interpretationtongues, speaking in tonguesOne among several gifts distributed by the Spirit, valuable but not superior to others, and one of the most misused/overvalued gifts at Corinthlínguas — NEW entry, Critical risk. This is one of the sharpest gift-related collisions for a Brazilian audience: uncontrolled or ecstatic speech attributed to spirit activity is a familiar category not only within (differing) Christian Pentecostal/charismatic tradition but also within Kardecist mediumship (psicofonia, spirits speaking through a medium) and Candomblé/Umbanda trance-possession utterance. Teaching must clearly ground “línguas” as a gift of the one Holy Spirit, exercised under the speaker’s ongoing self-control and always subject to order and interpretation (ch.14), never a state of spirit-possession displacing the speaker’s own consciousness or agency — a meaningful theological distinction from possession-trance phenomena.
προφητεία (12:10, 28-29)prophēteia”prophecy”Spirit-inspired, intelligible declaration of God’s truth for the church’s edificationprophecyA gift of intelligible, edifying, Spirit-given speech, distinct from and generally preferred over uninterpreted tongues (ch.14)profecia — REUSE baseline Romans TM exactly (risk: Low, per baseline; note however that the risk is meaningfully elevated in 1 Corinthians relative to Romans, since chs.12-14 treat prophecy as a currently operating congregational gift rather than the fulfilled-in-Christ Old Testament category emphasized in Romans — flag for native speaker review even though the baseline default is Low, given the mediumistic psicografia/psicofonia collision already documented for this term category).
διάκρισις πνευμάτων (12:10)diakrisis pneumatōn”distinguishing/discernment of spirits”the Spirit-given ability to judge whether a purported spiritual utterance or manifestation is truly from Goddiscerning of spirits, distinguishing spiritsA specific gift for testing claimed spiritual manifestations within the churchdiscernimento de espíritos — NEW entry, Critical risk. Extremely significant in the Brazilian context, where the practical question of distinguishing genuine Spirit-given manifestation from other spiritual phenomena (mediumistic, Afro-Brazilian ritual, or purely psychological) is a live pastoral concern, not a theoretical one; this gift should be taught as the church’s God-given tool for precisely this kind of discernment, reinforcing rather than undermining the doctrinal boundaries the baseline package already establishes around Holy Spirit, spiritual gifts, and prophecy.
σῶμα Χριστοῦ / μέλη (12:12-27)sōma Christou / melē”body of Christ” / “members”the church as a single organic body composed of interdependent members/partsbody of Christ, membersThe classic “body” metaphor: diverse members, one body, mutual interdependence, no member dispensable or superiorcorpo de Cristo / membros — NEW entry, High risk (central to the “Spiritual Gifts and the Body of Christ” curriculum doctrine); “corpo de Cristo” must be distinguished, where relevant, from the sacramental “corpo de Cristo” language of the Lord’s Supper (ch.11) — same phrase, two related but distinct referents (the church corporately here; the elements of the Supper there) — requiring context-sensitive handling and possibly a translator note where the two senses could be confused in close proximity.
βάπτισμα / βαπτίζω (12:13)baptisma / baptizō”baptism” / “to baptize, immerse”ritual/spiritual incorporation into Christ and his body, here specifically “baptized … into one body” by/in “one Spirit”baptism, baptizedAll believers, regardless of ethnic or social background, are united into the one body by the one Spiritbatismo / batizados — NEW entry, Medium risk. Standard vocabulary, though “baptized … in one Spirit” versus “baptized … with water” is a point of ongoing debate across denominational traditions represented in the target audience (Catholic sacramental baptism, Evangelical/Baptist believer’s baptism, Pentecostal Spirit-baptism theology); render literally without resolving the denominational debate in the translation itself.

Chapter 13 — Love as the Greater Way

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
ἀγάπη (13:1-13)agapē”love”self-giving, others-oriented love, as opposed to romantic or merely affectionate lovelove, charity (older English versions)The greatest and most necessary quality, without which even the most impressive spiritual gifts and sacrificial acts are worthless; love “never fails” and outlasts all giftsamor — NEW entry, HIGH risk. This is a genuinely significant Brazilian-specific collision: Kardecist Spiritism places caridade (charity/practical love of neighbor) at the very center of its ethical system as the primary means by which a spirit progresses morally across successive incarnations toward perfection — a framework with real surface-level resemblance to 1 Corinthians 13’s exaltation of love as “the greatest.” Teaching on this chapter must make explicit that Paul’s ἀγάπη is (a) a fruit and expression of a salvation already secured by grace through faith in the risen Christ (chs.1, 15), not a merit-generating practice advancing one’s own spiritual evolution across lifetimes, and (b) inseparable from the specific “resurrection gospel” content of ch.15 and the cross-centered gospel of ch.1-2, not a free-standing ethical principle detachable from those doctrines. Older English/Portuguese versions render this “caridade” (Almeida’s ARC uses “caridade” in 1 Corinthians 13 following the KJV’s “charity”); MODERN Portuguese Bible tradition (ARA and most contemporary versions) uses amor, which this Language Package adopts as the primary rendering specifically BECAUSE “caridade” in contemporary Brazilian usage is now even more strongly associated with the Kardecist ethical-progress framework than with the older English “charity” sense — “amor” is the safer and now-standard choice, but must always be taught with the contrastive note above.
τὰ τέλεια / τὰ ἐκ μέρους (13:9-12)ta teleia / ta ek merous”the complete/perfect things” / “the partial things”the future state of complete knowledge versus the present, partial statethe perfect / the partialPresent spiritual gifts (prophecy, tongues, knowledge) are partial and will be superseded by fuller knowledge; love alone continues into that completenesso que é perfeito / o que é parcial — Medium risk, standard vocabulary; ties to eschatological themes developed fully in ch.15.

Chapter 14 — Order, Edification, and Intelligible Worship

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
γλῶσσαι / προφητεία (14:1-40, throughout)glōssai / prophēteiasee Chapter 12tongues / prophecyThe relative value and proper regulated use of these two gifts in corporate worship; prophecy preferred because it is immediately intelligible and edifying to the whole church, while uninterpreted tongues are notlínguas / profecia — REUSE Chapter 12 entries exactly (Critical / Low-elevated risk respectively); chapter 14’s extended regulation of these gifts makes the Critical designation for “línguas” especially load-bearing here, since this chapter gives the fullest practical instruction on how tongues must function in a way clearly distinct from ecstatic/possession-trance phenomena — always intelligible when interpreted, always under the speaker’s self-control, always ordered (“one at a time,” v.27), never chaotic.
οἰκοδομή (14:3-5, 12, 17, 26)oikodomē”building up, edification”constructive strengthening of the church communityedification, building upThe governing criterion for evaluating and ordering the use of spiritual gifts in worship: does this build up the church?edificação — REUSE Chapter 3 entry (Medium risk); the central regulatory principle of the whole chapter.
ἑρμηνεία γλωσσῶν (14:5, 13, 26-28)hermēneia glōssōn”interpretation of tongues”the companion gift enabling the church to understand an utterance in tonguesinterpretation of tonguesTongues without interpretation are of no benefit to the gathered church and should not be exercised without itinterpretação de línguas — NEW entry, High risk; extends the ch.12/14 “línguas” collision — the requirement of interpretation for corporate benefit further distinguishes this gift from unregulated ecstatic/trance speech.
εὐσχημόνως καὶ κατὰ τάξιν (14:40)euschēmonōs kai kata taxin”decently/properly and in order”fitting, orderly conduct as opposed to chaosdecently and in orderThe chapter’s summary principle for all corporate worship practicesde modo decente e ordenado — Medium risk, standard vocabulary; central to the “Order in Worship” curriculum doctrine and should be rendered consistently wherever the principle recurs in teaching material.

Chapter 15 — The Resurrection of Christ and of Believers (continued beyond the core passage, vv.12-58)

(Verses 1-11 receive full verse-by-verse treatment in Part 1 above. The following terms occur in vv.12-58 and complete the chapter’s — and the book’s — central doctrine.)

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
ἀνάστασις νεκρῶν (15:12-13, 21, 42)anastasis nekrōn”resurrection of the dead”the general, future bodily resurrection of all the dead, of which Christ’s own resurrection is the pattern and guaranteeresurrection of the deadIf Christ was not raised, the whole gospel and faith are worthless (vv.14-19); but Christ was raised, guaranteeing believers’ own future bodily resurrectionressurreição dos mortos — REUSE baseline Romans TM stem exactly (risk: Critical). The single most important term in the entire curriculum for the Brazilian context: this chapter is the fullest New Testament argument for bodily resurrection anywhere in Scripture, engaged directly against a live, majority-adjacent cultural alternative (reincarnation) rather than a marginal one.
ἀπαρχή (15:20, 23)aparchē”firstfruits”the first portion of a harvest, guaranteeing and representing the full harvest to comefirstfruitsChrist’s resurrection as the “firstfruits” guaranteeing believers’ own future resurrection at his returnprimícias — NEW entry, High risk; requires an agricultural-metaphor gloss for readers without OT/agrarian background, and must retain the “guarantee of what is to come” logic central to the chapter’s argument — one, unrepeated resurrection event guaranteeing one, future bodily resurrection for believers, not a repeatable cycle.
ὁ ἔσχατος Ἀδάμ / ὁ πρῶτος Ἄνθρωπος (15:21-22, 45-49)ho eschatos Adam / ho prōtos anthrōpos”the last Adam” / “the first man”Christ as the second representative head of humanity, undoing the death brought by the first Adamlast Adam, first AdamAdam-Christ typology: as in Adam all die, so in Christ all who belong to him will be made alive; two representative heads of humanityo último Adão / o primeiro homem — NEW entry, High risk; requires OT background (Genesis creation and fall narrative) not universally assumed among culturally Christian or Spiritist-influenced readers; central to the chapter’s theological logic and must be rendered with care to preserve the one-to-one representative-head structure (not a cyclical or evolutionary succession of “improved” humanities).
σῶμα πνευματικόν / σῶμα ψυχικόν (15:44-46)sōma pneumatikon / sōma psychikon”spiritual body” / “natural/soulish body”the transformed, Spirit-empowered resurrection body, as opposed to the present, mortal, “natural” bodyspiritual body / natural bodyThe resurrection body is a real, transformed, physical body — not merely a surviving disembodied spirit or soul — empowered and directed entirely by the Spiritcorpo espiritual / corpo natural — NEW entry, CRITICAL risk. This is the single most theologically hazardous term-pair in the entire book for a Brazilian audience: Kardecism teaches that every human being possesses a perispírito (also called “corpo espiritual” or “corpo fluídico” in popular Spiritist literature) — a subtle body that survives physical death and is the vehicle for the spirit’s ongoing, disembodied existence and eventual re-incarnation into a new physical body. Paul’s “spiritual body” in 15:44 is doctrinally the OPPOSITE claim: not a naturally-existing subtle body a person already possesses and that simply continues after death, but a NEW, transformed, physical resurrection body given by God’s power at a future, one-time, bodily resurrection, replacing (not merely housing) the present mortal body. Every occurrence of “corpo espiritual” in Portuguese teaching materials on this passage must carry an explicit contrastive note distinguishing it from the Kardecist “corpo espiritual”/“perispírito,” or the term will very likely be heard by a Brazilian audience as confirming rather than confronting Spiritist doctrine. This is a Critical risk of the same order as the baseline’s treatment of “encarnação.”
φθαρτόν / ἄφθαρτον, φθορά / ἀφθαρσία (15:42, 50, 52-54)phtharton / aphtharton, phthora / aphtharsia”perishable/corruptible” / “imperishable/incorruptible”subject to decay versus permanently incapable of decayperishable / imperishable, corruption / incorruptionThe present body, “sown” in weakness and decay, is “raised” imperishable — a transformation given by God at the resurrection, not a property any human being (or spirit) already inherently possessescorruptível / incorruptível, corrupção / incorruptibilidade — CRITICAL risk. Directly related to and reinforcing the σῶμα πνευματικόν entry above: Kardecism teaches the soul/spirit’s INNATE, ALREADY-POSSESSED immortality, needing no future transformative act of God — the spirit simply continues indefinitely by its own nature, progressing across lives. Paul’s ἀφθαρσία is instead a FUTURE GIFT bestowed at the resurrection upon what is presently mortal and corruptible; immortality/incorruptibility is God’s gift given at a specific future moment to the body, not a natural, already-possessed property of an inherently immortal soul. This distinction is the theological crux of the entire chapter and must never be blurred in translation or teaching.
τὸ κέντρον τοῦ θανάτου / νῖκος (15:54-57)to kentron tou thanatou / nikos”the sting of death” / “victory”death’s power to harm, now nullified; decisive triumphsting of death / victoryChrist’s resurrection has decisively and permanently defeated death’s power over believers — a once-for-all victory, not an ongoing struggle across repeated life-cycleso aguilhão da morte / vitória — High risk; the decisive, completed nature of this victory (“Graças a Deus, que nos dá a vitória”, v.57) must be preserved against any reading that would relocate the “real” victory over death to a future, still-uncertain outcome of an ongoing cycle of lives.

Chapter 16 — The Collection, Final Greetings, and Maranatha

Term (Greek)TransliterationLiteral meaningSemantic rangeEnglish variantsContextual theological meaningPortuguese rendering & risk
λογεία (16:1-2)logeia”collection”a gathered monetary contributioncollection, offeringThe collection for the impoverished believers in Jerusalem, an expression of the ch.12 “one body” unity across congregationscoleta / oferta — NEW entry, Low risk, standard vocabulary; ties practically to the “Christian Unity” and “Body of Christ” doctrines already established.
φίλημα ἅγιον (16:20)philēma hagion”holy kiss”a customary greeting of Christian affection among believersholy kissA physical expression of genuine Christian fellowship and unity, closing the letter’s argument for unity with an embodied practice of itbeijo santo / ósculo santo — Low risk, standard formulaic greeting; note contemporary Brazilian custom typically substitutes a different physical greeting in practice (embrace, handshake), so teaching should clarify this reflects the cultural form of the affection commanded, not the specific physical act required.
μαράνα θά (16:22)marana thaAramaic, “Our Lord, come!“an urgent eschatological prayer/exclamation for Christ’s returnMaranatha, “Our Lord, come”A primitive, untranslated liturgical exclamation expressing longing for Christ’s return, closing the letter with the same resurrection-and-return hope that grounds ch.15Maranata — NEW entry, Medium risk; preserve the Aramaic transliteration untranslated, per the same principle the baseline established for “Abba” — do not translate into Portuguese (“Vem, Senhor nosso”) as the primary rendering, but retain the transliterated form with a gloss, consistent with established Portuguese Bible tradition (Almeida retains “Maranata”).

Chapters with No New Theological Vocabulary Beyond What Is Already Documented

No chapter of 1 Corinthians is entirely devoid of load-bearing theological vocabulary; every chapter (1-16) introduces at least one term requiring documentation, as reflected above. Chapters 9, 13, and 16 introduce comparatively fewer new terms and lean more heavily on vocabulary already established earlier in the book (e.g., ch. 9 reuses “evangelho” from the core passage; ch. 13 reuses “conhecimento” and “profecia” from ch. 8/12; ch. 16 reuses “igreja” and “santos” from earlier chapters) — this reuse is noted explicitly within each chapter’s table above rather than omitted.


This document extends but never contradicts the baseline Romans Language Package. All overlapping terms reuse the baseline’s exact recorded Portuguese rendering and risk tier. New terms follow the same Critical/High/Medium/Low framework, with explicit, grounded reasons tied to Brazil’s specific religious landscape (Kardecist Spiritism, Catholic popular piety, Afro-Brazilian Candomblé/Umbanda traditions, and Evangelical/Pentecostal diversity).

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words