Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis — Galatians (Full Book) in Koine Greek → Bodo

Methodology Note

This analysis extends the Romans Language Package (translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, doctrine_risk_registry.json) rather than replacing it. Every term already fixed by the Romans baseline is reused exactly and marked “REUSE — baseline TM” below; only its Galatians-specific contextual sense is added. Genuinely new terms (not present in the Romans baseline) are marked “NEW” and receive full field treatment: original word, transliteration, literal meaning, semantic range, English variants, contextual theological meaning, and destination-language rendering risk, with attention to the same two live comparative-religion currents documented in the baseline — Bathouism (Bathoubwrai, the sijou plant, the five elements ha/dwi/bar/or/okhrang, the Kherai puja and its doudini medium) and Brahma Dharma (the 1912 Sanskritized reform movement). All new renderings are provisional pending confirmation by a Bodo-speaking theologian, per the baseline’s own caveat standard.

The core passage (Galatians 2:15-21) receives full verse-by-verse treatment. Every other chapter of the book (1, 2:1-14, 3, 4, 5, 6) receives chapter-level treatment of its load-bearing terms. Chapters that introduce no new vocabulary beyond what has already been analyzed say so explicitly.

PART A — CORE PASSAGE: Galatians 2:15-21 (Verse-by-Verse)

Galatians 2:15

Greek: Ἡμεῖς φύσει Ἰουδαῖοι καὶ οὐκ ἐξ ἐθνῶν ἁμαρτωλοί. Gloss: “We by nature Jews and not sinners from the Gentiles.”

Ἰουδαῖοι (Ioudaioi) — NEW. Literal meaning: “Jews, Judeans.” Semantic range: ethnic-covenantal identity as heirs of the Mosaic covenant. English variants: “Jews.” Contextual meaning: Paul’s own covenant-insider identity, set up as the premise he is about to relativize. Bodo rendering: जिहूदी (jihudi) — already implicit in the baseline doctrine registry’s compound “जिहूदी आरो गैर-जुथुदनि गोसोमोन” (Unity of Jews and Gentiles); adopted here as the standalone noun. Risk: Medium — requires Old Testament covenant-background teaching, since Bodo hearers have no native concept of ethnic-covenant status; must not be reinterpreted through Bodo clan (afad) lineage categories.
ἐθνῶν (ethnōn) — REUSE — baseline TM. गैर-जुथुद (goir-juthud). Risk: Medium (unchanged from Romans).
ἁμαρτωλοί (hamartōloi) — NEW. Literal meaning: “sinners, ones who miss the mark.” Semantic range: morally guilty before a personal God (not ritual impurity). English variants: “sinners.” Contextual meaning: Paul ironically cites the Jewish/Gentile “sinner” label he is about to dismantle theologically. Bodo rendering: गुनाहगार (gunahgar), built on the already-established baseline root गुनाह (gunah, “sin”). Risk: Low — safely derivative of an established Critical-adjacent root; no new syncretism risk, since it names moral guilt, not ritual defilement addressed by Bathou/Kherai cleansing rites.

Galatians 2:16

Greek: εἰδότες δὲ ὅτι οὐ δικαιοῦται ἄνθρωπος ἐξ ἔργων νόμου ἐὰν μὴ διὰ πίστεως Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, καὶ ἡμεῖς εἰς Χριστὸν Ἰησοῦν ἐπιστεύσαμεν, ἵνα δικαιωθῶμεν ἐκ πίστεως Χριστοῦ καὶ οὐκ ἐξ ἔργων νόμου, ὅτι ἐξ ἔργων νόμου οὐ δικαιωθήσεται πᾶσα σάρξ.

δικαιοῦται / δικαιωθῶμεν / δικαιωθήσεται (dikaioutai / dikaiōthōmen / dikaiōthēsetai) — REUSE — baseline TM. धार्मिक होनाय राव (dharmik honai rao), “justification.” Contextual meaning: the letter’s thesis verb, repeated three times in one sentence for emphasis — this is Galatians’ Romans-4-equivalent center of gravity. Risk: Critical (as in baseline) — must retain the full forensic “declared righteous,” never collapse to mere “forgiven.”
ἔργα νόμου (erga nomou) — NEW compound, built on reused parts. Literal meaning: “works of the law.” Semantic range: covenant-boundary observances (circumcision, food laws, Sabbath) understood by Paul’s opponents as necessary for covenant membership. English variants: “works of the law,” “law-keeping,” “legal observance.” Contextual theological meaning: the explicit negative pole of the letter’s central antithesis (works of law vs. faith in Christ) — arguably the single most load-bearing phrase in Galatians. Bodo rendering: बिथाननि गुनथि (bithanni gunthi), combining baseline बिथान (law) with गुनथि (“conduct/deed,” already attested in the baseline’s compound for imputed_righteousness’s rejected alternative). Risk: Critical — must be kept sharply distinct from बिश्वासनि मानोन (obedience of faith, already Critical in baseline); this phrase is the very “works” pole that both Bathou reciprocal-offering religion and Brahma Dharma’s merit ethic will instinctively pull toward. Requires explicit teaching that “works of the law” here specifically means Torah-observance, not law-keeping in general.
πίστεως Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ / πίστεως Χριστοῦ (pisteōs Iēsou Christou / pisteōs Christou) — REUSE — baseline TM. बिश्वास (biswas), object always specified as “in Jesus Christ.” Risk: High (as baseline) — flag for native-speaker/theologian review since Greek syntax here is genuinely ambiguous between “faith in Christ” (objective genitive, traditional reading) and “the faithfulness of Christ” (subjective genitive, minority scholarly reading); this curriculum should follow the traditional objective-genitive reading for consistency with the Romans baseline’s established बिश्वास usage, but the ambiguity should be recorded in the segment cache per the AI instruction set’s ambiguity-handling rule.
ἐπιστεύσαμεν (episteusamen) — REUSE, verb form of baseline noun. Rendered as बिश्वास खालामबाय (“we believed/put faith in”), verb form of बिश्वास. Risk: High (parallel to noun).
πᾶσα σάρξ (pasa sarx) — NEW (idiom: “all flesh” = “no human being”). σάρξ literal meaning: “flesh, physical body/substance.” Semantic range in Galatians spans (a) literal body/human descent (cf. 1:16, 2:20b), and (b) the theologically loaded sense “sinful human nature in its own strength, opposed to the Spirit” (developed fully in ch. 5). Here in 2:16 it functions idiomatically for “any human being.” English variants: “no flesh,” “no one,” “no human being.” Bodo rendering: गाव (gao), the ordinary Bodo word for body/flesh, used idiomatically here as “गाबेবो मानुष…जायाब्ला नङा” (“not a single person”). Risk: High — σάρξ’s dual semantic range (neutral “physical body” vs. morally loaded “flesh-nature”) must be flagged every time it recurs, since a single Bodo gloss cannot carry both senses without contextual translator notes; full risk analysis deferred to Chapter 5 below where the ethical sense becomes the letter’s explicit topic.

Galatians 2:17

Greek: εἰ δὲ ζητοῦντες δικαιωθῆναι ἐν Χριστῷ εὑρέθημεν καὶ αὐτοὶ ἁμαρτωλοί, ἆρα Χριστὸς ἁμαρτίας διάκονος; μὴ γένοιτο.

ζητοῦντες δικαιωθῆναι ἐν Χριστῷ — reuses δικαιωθῆναι (Critical, as above) plus ἐν Χριστῷ (en Christō) — NEW phrase, though conceptually anticipated by the baseline doctrine “Christian Identity in Christ” (मसीहाव मसीहि फिसाजोंनाय). Literal meaning: “in Christ,” a locative/incorporative formula for union with Christ. Bodo rendering here: मसीहाव (Mosihau), “in Christ” (locative case marker on मसीह). Risk: High — this spatial-sounding phrase must not be read as Christ being a location, deity-seat, or shrine (नमासोलि, already flagged in baseline as the forbidden church-collision term) but as personal incorporation into Christ’s life and death.
ἁμαρτωλοί (hamartōloi) — reuse of 2:15 rendering, गुनाहगार.
Χριστὸς ἁμαρτίας διάκονος (Christos hamartias diakonos) — NEW. διάκονος literal meaning: “servant, minister, one who serves at table.” Semantic range: functionary/agent who enables or serves something. English variants: “minister,” “servant,” “agent,” “promoter.” Contextual meaning: Paul’s rhetorical horror-question — “Is Christ then a promoter/servant of sin?” Bodo rendering: गुनाहनि सेवक (gunahni sewok), “servant of sin.” Risk: Medium — the rhetorical-question form itself (μὴ γένοιτο) is the greater risk (see next entry); सेवक alone carries low doctrinal risk.
μὴ γένοιτο (mē genoito) — NEW idiom. Literal meaning: “may it not become/happen.” Semantic range: an emphatic negation formula (lit. optative of wish), used 14 times across Paul’s letters. English variants: “Certainly not!”, “By no means!”, “God forbid!”, “Never!” Contextual meaning: strongest possible rhetorical rejection of an unacceptable logical implication. Bodo rendering: no single lexical equivalent; recommend an idiomatic exclamatory rendering such as “बेयेन कभि जायाखै!” (beyen kobhi jayakhoi, “this will certainly never happen!”) rather than a literal “may it not become.” Risk: Medium — flagged under the AI instruction set’s idiom-handling rule: theological force must be preserved (strongest possible denial) even though no direct lexical match exists; must not be softened into a mild “I don’t think so.”

Galatians 2:18

Greek: εἰ γὰρ ἃ κατέλυσα ταῦτα πάλιν οἰκοδομῶ, παραβάτην ἐμαυτὸν συνιστάνω.

κατέλυσα / οἰκοδομῶ (katelysa / oikodomō) — NEW, a building-demolition metaphor pair. Literal meanings: “I tore down / I build up (again).” Semantic range: metaphorical for abandoning vs. reinstating a system (here, the law as a basis for righteousness). English variants: “destroyed/tore down” and “rebuild.” Contextual meaning: Paul illustrates the self-contradiction of a Jewish Christian (like Peter, cf. 2:11-14) who abandoned law-based righteousness in principle but then re-imposes it in practice. Bodo rendering: फेलाबाय (phelabai, “tore down/demolished”) and फिन बानायो (phin banayo, “builds again”). Risk: Low — ordinary construction-metaphor vocabulary; no comparative-religion collision identified.
παραβάτην (parabatēn) — NEW. Literal meaning: “transgressor, one who steps across (a boundary).” Semantic range: a violator of a specific standard (here, the law). English variants: “transgressor,” “lawbreaker,” “offender.” Contextual meaning: Paul says that reinstating the law-based system after abandoning it proves him a transgressor of the very principle he claimed to follow. Bodo rendering: अपराधी (oporadhi), a widely attested Sanskrit/Hindi-derived loan for “offender.” Risk: Low-Medium — generic legal-moral term, but should not be confused with गुनाहगार (sinner, the broader theological category); अपराधी here names a specific rule-violator role in Paul’s argument.

Galatians 2:19

Greek: ἐγὼ γὰρ διὰ νόμου νόμῳ ἀπέθανον ἵνα θεῷ ζήσω. Χριστῷ συνεσταύρωμαι·

διὰ νόμου νόμῳ ἀπέθανον (dia nomou nomō apethanon) — reuses baseline बिथान (law). Contextual meaning: a deliberately paradoxical statement — “through the law I died to the law” — the law itself (in condemning Paul) drove him out of a law-based existence into a Christ-based one. Risk: High — this paradox must be preserved, not smoothed away; flattening it into “I stopped following the law” loses Paul’s point that the law’s own verdict of condemnation is what ends its jurisdiction over the believer.
θεῷ ζήσω (theō zēsō) — “that I might live to God.” ζάω/ζήσω is ordinary vocabulary (Low risk); θεός reuses baseline ईश्वर.
Χριστῷ συνεσταύρωμαι (Christō synestaurōmai) — NEW, CRITICAL — the core passage’s central doctrinal term (doctrine: “Crucified with Christ”). Original word: συσταυρόω (synstauroō), perfect passive here. Literal meaning: “I have been crucified together with.” Semantic range: co-crucifixion, union with Christ’s death, a once-for-all completed state with ongoing effect (perfect tense). English variants: “I have been crucified with Christ,” “I am crucified with Christ.” Contextual theological meaning: the believer’s old self, under the law’s condemnation, has died with Christ on the cross — the ground of the “died to the law” statement just made. Bodo rendering (provisional): मसीहजों समान खुरुसाव गोथाखानाय (Mosihjw soman khurusau gwthakhanai) — “crucified together with Christ on the cross,” built on खुरुस (khurus), the transliterated loan for “cross” (paralleling the established regional Bible-translation convention, cf. Hindi क्रूस/Assamese ক্রুচ), combined with a descriptive compound for “co-crucifixion.” Risk: CRITICAL — this must never be assimilated to (a) Bathou/Kherai possession-trance imagery (a spirit temporarily entering/seizing a person is categorically different from the believer’s old self dying with Christ), (b) any rebirth/reincarnation-adjacent notion (cf. baseline’s फिन जोनोम prohibition for resurrection — this term must not be read as “dying to be reborn in a cycle”), or (c) martyrdom-merit language (this is not Paul earning standing by suffering, but a once-for-all completed legal/spiritual union). Requires mandatory human theologian review per the AI instruction set’s escalation rules (any segment containing Crucifixion/union-with-Christ language should be added to that escalation list alongside Incarnation, Resurrection, and Lordship).

Galatians 2:20

Greek: ζῶ δὲ οὐκέτι ἐγώ, ζῇ δὲ ἐν ἐμοὶ Χριστός· ὃ δὲ νῦν ζῶ ἐν σαρκί, ἐν πίστει ζῶ τῇ τοῦ υἱοῦ τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ἀγαπήσαντός με καὶ παραδόντος ἑαυτὸν ὑπὲρ ἐμοῦ.

ζῶ … Χριστός ἐν ἐμοί (zō … Christos en emoi) — “I live, yet Christ lives in me.” Contextual meaning: the positive counterpart of 2:19’s crucifixion statement — union with Christ is not annihilation of the self but new life with Christ as its animating center. Risk: High — must be distinguished explicitly from Kherai-puja possession language (a deity temporarily indwelling/speaking through a doudini medium); Christ’s indwelling here is permanent, personal, and does not displace or override Paul’s own conscious agency, unlike ritual trance possession.
ἐν σαρκί (en sarki) — here σάρξ (see 2:16 entry) carries its neutral, non-ethical sense: “in the body,” i.e., ordinary physical existence. Bodo rendering: गाव (gao), same lexeme as 2:16 but glossed here as simply “bodily life,” not “sinful nature.” Risk: High — precisely because the same Bodo word गाव must carry two different senses within five verses of each other (2:16 idiomatic “no one,” 2:20 neutral “bodily life,” and later in ch. 5 the fully negative ethical sense), translator notes are required at every occurrence to specify which sense is active.
πίστει τῇ τοῦ υἱοῦ τοῦ θεοῦ (pistei tē tou huiou tou theou) — reuses बिश्वास (faith) + ईश्वरनि गोरा (Son of God, REUSE — baseline TM, Critical). Same genitive ambiguity as 2:16 (subjective/objective) applies. Risk: Critical, inherited from both बिश्वास (High) and ईश्वरनि गोरा (Critical in baseline) — this is one of the escalation-list doctrines (Sonship of Christ, Deity of Christ) and must receive mandatory theologian review.
τοῦ ἀγαπήσαντός με (tou agapēsantos me) — NEW (“having loved me”), from ἀγάπη/ἀγαπάω. Literal meaning: “love” in the sense of committed, self-giving benevolence (distinct from ἔρως/romantic love or φιλία/friendship-affection, though Koine usage overlaps somewhat). Semantic range: covenantal, sacrificial, willed love — the term used for both divine love and the love Christians owe one another (cf. ch. 5’s “faith working through love,” and “love your neighbor,” 5:14). English variants: “love.” Contextual meaning here: Christ’s own self-giving love as the ground of Paul’s new life. Bodo rendering (provisional): प्रेम (prem), a Sanskrit/Assamese loan already in wide devotional use across the region. Risk: High — प्रेम must be explicitly taught as willed, self-giving, covenantal love (agapē), not romantic affection, mere family fondness, or the devotional bhakti-love (personal loving devotion to a chosen deity) emphasized in Brahma Dharma’s reformed piety, which centers on the worshipper’s affective devotion to God rather than God’s prior self-giving love toward the sinner. This term recurs as a load-bearing word throughout Galatians 5 (fruit of the Spirit; “faith working through love”; “love your neighbor”) and should be confirmed by a Bodo-speaking theologian before wide deployment, per the baseline’s own standard for provisional compounds.
παραδόντος ἑαυτὸν ὑπὲρ ἐμοῦ (paradontos heauton hyper emou) — NEW. Literal meaning: “having given himself over/handed himself over on behalf of me.” Semantic range: substitutionary self-sacrifice; the same verb (παραδίδωμι) used of Judas “handing over” Jesus and of Jesus voluntarily “handing himself over” — the term deliberately reframes betrayal-language as willing self-gift. English variants: “gave himself for me,” “handed himself over for me,” “sacrificed himself for me.” Contextual theological meaning: substitutionary atonement — Christ’s voluntary, vicarious self-offering “for me” (ὑπέρ, “on behalf of / in place of”). Bodo rendering (provisional): बिनि जिउखौ आं थाखाय दानै होबाय (bini jiukhw ang thakhai danai hobai), “he gave his own life as a gift for me,” deliberately reusing the दान (daan, “gift”) root already fixed in the baseline’s मोफादांनाय दान (grace). Risk: High — this reuse is intentional (Christ’s self-giving is the ground of grace as unmerited gift), but must be explicitly taught as a one-time, sufficient, substitutionary sacrifice, not folded into the reciprocal do-ut-des logic of Bathou/Kherai offerings (which “give” to Bathoubwrai or the pantheon in exchange for protection) — precisely the collision the baseline’s grace entry already warns against. Should be flagged for theologian review any time this phrase co-occurs with atonement/propitiation language, per the AI instruction set’s escalation rule for Romans 3:25-type material.

Galatians 2:21

Greek: Οὐκ ἀθετῶ τὴν χάριν τοῦ θεοῦ· εἰ γὰρ διὰ νόμου δικαιοσύνη, ἄρα Χριστὸς δωρεὰν ἀπέθανεν.

ἀθετῶ (athetō) — NEW. Literal meaning: “I set aside, nullify, reject, treat as invalid.” Semantic range: to render null/void something otherwise valid or binding (a legal/covenantal term). English variants: “nullify,” “set aside,” “reject,” “make void.” Contextual meaning: Paul denies that his gospel of justification apart from law-works nullifies God’s grace — rather, the opposite (adding law-works back in would nullify grace). Bodo rendering (provisional): बाजि खालामनाय (baji khalamnai), “to make void/invalid.” Risk: Medium — must be carefully placed with correct negation (“I do NOT nullify”), since the sentence’s rhetorical structure is a self-defense against a charge Paul is refuting, not a confession.
τὴν χάριν τοῦ θεοῦ (tēn charin tou theou) — REUSE — baseline TM. मोफादांनाय दान (grace of God). Risk: Critical (unchanged) — this verse is one of the clearest single-sentence statements in the New Testament of grace-vs-works incompatibility and should be flagged under the AI instruction set’s existing escalation rule (“any segment where grace is being contrasted with works/merit/ritual exchange”).
διὰ νόμου δικαιοσύνη (dia nomou dikaiosynē) — reuses बिथान (law) + धार्मिकता (REUSE — baseline TM, righteousness, Critical). Contextual meaning: the conditional clause names the very position Paul rejects — righteousness attainable through law. Risk: Critical (inherited).
δωρεὰν ἀπέθανεν (dōrean apethanen) — NEW sense-flag. δωρεάν literal meaning: “freely, as a gift, without payment” — the SAME word used elsewhere (e.g., Romans 3:24) for grace’s free giving — but here functioning idiomatically to mean “for nothing, in vain, to no purpose.” Semantic range: (a) “as a free gift” (positive, grace-related) vs. (b) “needlessly, pointlessly” (negative, used here). English variants: “died for nothing,” “died in vain,” “died needlessly.” Contextual theological meaning: if righteousness could be achieved through law, Christ’s death would have been pointless — the strongest possible argument for the necessity of the cross. Bodo rendering: बेकार (bekar), “in vain, for nothing, useless” (a widely attested Hindi/Urdu-derived loan), deliberately NOT the same lexeme used for grace’s “freely given” sense (मोफादांनाय दान already carries that meaning via दान). Risk: High — flag explicitly in translator notes that δωρεάν here is the negative, contextual sense (“pointlessly”) and must not be rendered with any cognate of दान (gift), which would confusingly suggest Christ’s death was itself a “free gift” in this clause rather than the conditional argument’s “would have been pointless.”

PART B — CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER STUDY OF THE WHOLE BOOK

Chapter 1 (Galatians 1:1-24) — Apostleship, the True Gospel, and Paul’s Call

ἀπόστολος (apostolos) — REUSE — baseline TM. गोदान जायगारि. Risk: Medium (unchanged). Contextual note: Gal 1:1 stresses the apostleship is “not from men nor through man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father” — the direct-commission emphasis is even sharper here than in Romans and should be preserved forcefully.
εὐαγγέλιον (euangelion) — REUSE — baseline TM. मंगल खबर. Risk: High (unchanged).
χάρις καὶ εἰρήνη (charis kai eirēnē) — REUSE — baseline TM. मोफादांनाय दान / सान्ति (grace and peace, the standard Pauline greeting). Risk: Critical/Medium respectively (unchanged).
μεταστρέψαι (metastrepsai), from Gal 1:7, “to distort/pervert [the gospel]” — NEW. Literal meaning: “to turn/twist around.” Semantic range: distortion that reverses or corrupts something into its opposite. English variants: “pervert,” “distort,” “twist.” Contextual meaning: names the false-gospel activity the whole letter opposes (doctrine: “The True Gospel versus False Gospels”). Bodo rendering (provisional): मंगल खबरखौ बांद्राय खालामनाय (mangal khaborkhw bandrai khalamnai), “to twist/corrupt the gospel.” Risk: High — must clearly convey doctrinal corruption of a fixed, authoritative message, not mere stylistic variation; should be distinguished from Brahma Dharma’s own self-description as a “reform/purification” of prior Bodo religious practice — Paul is not calling for reform of tradition but naming an outright counterfeit of a fixed apostolic message.
ἀνάθεμα (anathema), Gal 1:8-9 — NEW. Literal meaning: “accursed, given over to divine judgment, devoted to destruction.” Semantic range: a solemn covenantal curse-formula (cf. LXX usage for things devoted to destruction under holy war). English variants: “let him be cursed,” “accursed,” “anathema” (transliterated in many English versions). Contextual meaning: Paul’s double pronouncement of curse on anyone preaching a different gospel — the letter’s most severe rhetorical statement. Bodo rendering (provisional): अभिशाप जायो (obhishap jayo), “let a curse come [upon him],” built on the Sanskrit/Hindi-derived loan अभिशाप (“curse”). Risk: High — must be carefully distinguished from folk-belief curses addressed by an ओझा (ritual specialist) or removable through counter-ritual; God’s judicial anathema in Galatians is a solemn, unappealable covenantal condemnation for corrupting the gospel, not a magical affliction subject to ritual reversal. Requires theologian review given the escalation rule for doctrinally severe statements.
ἀποκάλυψις (apokalypsis), Gal 1:12, 1:16 — NEW. Literal meaning: “unveiling, disclosure.” Semantic range: direct divine self-disclosure of previously hidden truth. English variants: “revelation.” Contextual meaning: Paul insists his gospel came not from human teaching but by direct revelation of Jesus Christ. Bodo rendering (provisional): ईश्वरनि खुलাइनाय (Isorni khulainai), “God’s opening/unveiling [of truth].” Risk: High — must be sharply distinguished from the oracular trance-disclosure attributed to a doudini during Kherai puja, in which a deity is understood to speak through a possessed human medium in the moment of ritual trance. Paul’s revelation is a personal, once-for-all divine disclosure of the gospel’s content, not a recurring ritual mediumship event, and should be taught with that distinction explicit (parallel to the baseline’s treatment of “called” and “power_of_god”).
ἀφορίζω (aphorizō), Gal 1:15, “set apart… from my mother’s womb” — conceptually reuses the baseline doctrine “Separation unto God’s Service” (ईश्वरनि सेवानि थाखाय फोजोबनाय). Bodo rendering: फोजोब खालामबाय (phojob khalambai), “was set apart.” Risk: High (inherited from baseline doctrine tier) — Paul’s pre-birth setting-apart for ministry should not be confused with any Bathou household ritual dedication of a child.
ζηλωτής (zēlōtēs), Gal 1:14, “zealous… for the traditions” — NEW. Literal meaning: “zealot, one who is intensely devoted/eager.” Semantic range: intense, often militant devotion to a cause or tradition. English variants: “zealous,” “extremely devoted.” Bodo rendering: उৎসाही (utsahi), “zealous, enthusiastic” (Sanskrit loan). Risk: Low-Medium — describes Paul’s pre-conversion life; low doctrinal risk on its own, but sets up the letter’s broader critique of zeal misdirected toward law-observance.
παράδοσις (paradosis), Gal 1:14, “traditions of my fathers” — NEW. Literal meaning: “that which is handed down.” Semantic range: inherited communal teaching/custom, transmitted across generations. English variants: “tradition,” “ancestral custom.” Contextual meaning: Paul’s pre-conversion devotion to inherited Jewish ancestral tradition (contrasted later with the gospel received by direct revelation). Bodo rendering (provisional): पूर्खा नि नियम (purkha ni niyom), “ancestral rule/custom.” Risk: High — this term sits close to two live Bodo currents at once: strong ancestral-clan (afad) tradition-loyalty generally, and specifically the veneration of ancestral household spirits (बुरहा-बुरही आत्था, already named as a forbidden Holy-Spirit substitution in the baseline). Teaching notes must make clear Paul is describing his own prior religious inheritance neutrally/critically, not making a general statement devaluing ancestral custom as such — but the parallel to Bodo ancestor-reverence needs to be named directly rather than left implicit.
διωγμός (diōgmos), Gal 1:13, “I persecuted the church” — NEW. Literal meaning: “persecution, hostile pursuit.” Bodo rendering: उৎপীড়न (utpiron) or descriptively जोरन खालামনায় (joron khalamnai), “oppression.” Risk: Low.

Chapter 2, verses 1-14 (the remainder of Chapter 2 outside the core passage)

περιτομή (peritomē), “circumcision” — NEW, and among the highest-stakes terms in the whole letter (doctrine: “Circumcision and the New Creation”). Literal meaning: “a cutting around” (the removal of the male foreskin). Semantic range: the Old Testament covenant sign given to Abraham (Genesis 17), by Paul’s opponents’ time treated as a required boundary-marker for full covenant membership. English variants: “circumcision.” Contextual meaning: the concrete practice the “circumcision party” (Titus’s case, 2:3-5; Peter’s withdrawal, 2:12) demanded of Gentile converts — the specific “work of the law” the letter’s thesis in 2:16 has in view. Bodo rendering (provisional): खतना (khatna), a widely attested Persian/Urdu-derived loanword used across South Asian languages (including Hindi) for this specific ritual practice. Risk: High — while Bodo culture has no direct native ritual analogue to circumcision (unlike Bathou practice’s own purification rites), the concept must be carefully unpacked with Old Testament covenant background; care must also be taken that “requiring circumcision” is not flattened into a generic illustration of “legalism” divorced from its specific historical referent, since the whole letter’s argument depends on this concrete, historically located controversy.
ψευδάδελφοι (pseudadelphoi), Gal 2:4, “false brothers” — NEW. Bodo rendering (provisional): मिथ्या भाइयारि (mithya bhaiyari), “false brothers,” using the Sanskrit loan मिथ्या (“false”). Risk: Medium — describes infiltrators feigning Christian identity to impose law-observance; should not be confused with ordinary doctrinal disagreement among genuine believers.
ἡ ἀλήθεια τοῦ εὐαγγελίου (hē alētheia tou euangeliou), “the truth of the gospel,” Gal 2:5, 2:14 — NEW compound, built on the reused मंगल खबर. Bodo rendering: मंगल खबरनि सत्य (mangal khaborni sotyo), using सत्य (“truth,” Sanskrit loan). Risk: Medium — asserts the gospel has one fixed, defensible content, a claim that must be preserved against any drift toward treating गॉस्पेल truth as one valid religious option among several (a live risk given the region’s multiple active religious-identity movements).
στῦλοι (styloi), Gal 2:9, “pillars” (James, Peter, John) — NEW, a leadership metaphor. Bodo rendering: खम (kham), the ordinary Bodo word for “pillar/post.” Risk: Low — natural architectural metaphor; low collision risk, though translators should avoid any resonance with a literal ritual post (such as the sijou plant’s central courtyard placement in Bathou practice) — recommend a brief translator note clarifying this is a purely metaphorical, non-ritual image of leadership stability.
ὑπόκρισις (hypokrisis), Gal 2:13, Peter’s “hypocrisy” — NEW. Literal meaning: “acting a part, playing a role” (theatrical origin). Bodo rendering: कपट (kopot), “hypocrisy/deceit” (Sanskrit/Hindi loan). Risk: Medium — names inconsistency between profession and practice among leaders; pastorally sensitive material given its application to a named apostle (Peter).

Chapter 3 (Galatians 3:1-29) — Abraham, the Curse of the Law, and the Promise

ἐβασκάνατε (ebaskanate), Gal 3:1, “who has bewitched you?” — NEW, and among the letter’s most culturally sensitive terms. Literal meaning: “cast the evil eye upon, bewitched.” Semantic range: in Greco-Roman folk belief, malevolent supernatural harm inflicted through a look/spell; used here rhetorically/metaphorically by Paul, not literally. English variants: “bewitched,” “cast a spell on,” or more neutrally “deceived, misled.” Contextual meaning: Paul’s incredulous rhetorical question expressing astonishment that the Galatians abandoned the true gospel so quickly, as if placed under a spell. Bodo rendering (provisional, RECOMMENDED): गोरोबथाव खालामबाय (gorobthau khalambai), “[who] has deceived/misled [you]” — a non-literal rendering deliberately chosen over any Bodo term naming actual evil-eye sorcery. Risk: CRITICAL — Bodo village religious life includes real, currently-practiced fear of evil-eye affliction and folk-curse activity typically addressed by an ओझा ritual specialist; a literal rendering here risks being read as Paul affirming that the Galatians were literally placed under an occult curse by a rival sorcerer, rather than using a common idiom rhetorically for “who deceived you doctrinally.” Mandatory theologian and native-speaker review before deployment; translator note must state explicitly that this is rhetorical/idiomatic, not a claim about literal sorcery.
Ἀβραάμ (Abraam) — NEW proper name. Standard transliteration: अब्राहाम (Abraham). Risk: Medium — requires substantial Old Testament narrative background (Genesis 12, 15, 17), since neither Bathou oral tradition nor Brahma Dharma’s Sanskritized reform literature contains an analogous founding-patriarch-with-covenant-promise narrative; this is a genuine content gap to teach, not merely a vocabulary choice.
ἐλογίσθη αὐτῷ εἰς δικαιοσύνην (elogisthē autō eis dikaiosynēn), Gal 3:6, quoting Genesis 15:6 — REUSE — baseline TM. दानै लाबोनाय धार्मिकता (imputed righteousness). Risk: Critical (unchanged) — Galatians 3 is in fact the letter’s own extended argument from this same Genesis text that Romans 4 also expounds; renderings must be verbatim-identical across both curricula per the Theological Consistency Rules already established.
κατάρα (katara), Gal 3:10, 13, “the curse of the law” — NEW. Literal meaning: “curse, imprecation.” Semantic range: the covenantal curse pronounced on those who fail to keep the whole law (Deuteronomy 27-28 background); distinct from ἀνάθεμα’s specific apostolic-authority curse-pronouncement in ch. 1. English variants: “curse.” Bodo rendering (provisional): अभिशाप (obhishap) — the same lexeme proposed for ἀνάθεμα in ch. 1, since both name solemn covenantal condemnation, though the referent differs (law’s curse on lawbreakers vs. Paul’s curse on false teachers). Risk: High — must be distinguished carefully from folk-belief curses/black magic addressed through an ओझा, exactly as noted above for ἀνάθεμα and ἐβασκάνατε; this chapter contains three related “curse” concepts within thirteen verses (3:1 bewitchment, 3:10/13 law’s curse) and risks compounding confusion if not each separately flagged with translator notes distinguishing biblical covenant-curse from folk-magic curse categories.
ἐξαγοράζω (exagorazō), Gal 3:13, “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law” — NEW. Literal meaning: “to buy out of, to purchase out of (slavery/a marketplace).” Semantic range: a commercial ransom/redemption metaphor, drawn from the slave market. English variants: “redeemed,” “bought back,” “ransomed.” Contextual theological meaning: Christ’s death as the price paid to release believers from the law’s curse — closely related to, but distinct from, φοराय (baseline’s “salvation/deliverance” term). Bodo rendering (provisional): दाम होनाय फोरायनाय (daam honai phoraynai), “delivered by paying a price,” combining बाजार-language दाम (“price,” a common Assamese/Bodo commercial loanword) with the baseline फोराय- root. Risk: High — must not collapse into ordinary फोरायनाय (salvation) without the “paid a price” nuance, since Galatians 3:13 makes the atonement’s cost explicit (Christ himself “became a curse for us,” quoting Deuteronomy 21:23) — this should be flagged for theologian review alongside atonement/propitiation material per the AI instruction set’s escalation rule.
ἐπαγγελία (epangelia), “promise,” used repeatedly through ch. 3 (vv. 14, 16-22, 29) — NEW, though structurally parallel to the baseline doctrine-name compound “मसीहनि थारायनाय” (Messianic Promise). Bodo rendering: थारायनाय (tharainai), “promise, what is promised,” extracted as a standalone noun from that existing compound for consistency. Risk: Medium — must be kept terminologically distinct from नियम/बिथान (law); the entire chapter’s argument depends on promise and law being sequentially and logically distinct categories, not synonyms.
σπέρμα (sperma), Gal 3:16, 29, “seed/offspring [of Abraham]” — NEW, structurally parallel to the baseline’s दाऊदनि बेंसे (seed of David). Bodo rendering: अब्राहामनि बेंसे (Abrahamni bense), reusing बेंसे (“seed/lineage/descendant”). Risk: High — Paul’s argument in 3:16 turns on the singular form of “seed” pointing specifically to Christ, not the plural “descendants” generally; then in 3:29 all believers are declared Abraham’s “seed” by union with Christ. This singular/corporate-through-Christ argument has no ready parallel in Bodo clan (afad) lineage thinking, where lineage identity runs strictly through birth descent, and must be explicitly taught rather than assumed, exactly as the baseline already flags for “seed of David.”
μεσίτης (mesitēs), Gal 3:19-20, “mediator” (of the law, i.e., Moses) — NEW. Literal meaning: “one who stands in the middle, a go-between.” Bodo rendering (provisional): मध्यस्थ (modhyostha), a Sanskrit/Hindi-derived loan for “mediator, intermediary.” Risk: High — must be sharply distinguished from the mediating role Bodo tradition attributes to a doudini or ओझा carrying petitions between the human community and Bathoubwrai/the Kherai pantheon; Moses’ mediatorial role here is a historical, one-time covenant-giving function, not an ongoing ritual-mediumship office, and Christ’s own superior mediatorial role (developed further in later New Testament books) should be flagged for future curricula.
παιδαγωγός (paidagōgos), Gal 3:24-25, “the law was our guardian/tutor until Christ came” — NEW. Literal meaning: a household slave charged with supervising and disciplining a freeborn child until adulthood (not a “teacher” in the modern sense). Semantic range: temporary, custodial, disciplinary supervision with a built-in expiration point. English variants: “guardian,” “tutor,” “disciplinarian,” “custodian.” Contextual theological meaning: the law’s temporary, custodial function preparing for and giving way to faith in Christ — critical to the doctrine “The Law’s Purpose.” Bodo rendering (provisional): बिथाननि रखिया (bithanni rokhia), “the law’s guardian/keeper,” built on baseline बिथान plus the Assamese-derived रखिया (“guard/custodian”). Risk: High — must convey the temporary, preparatory, now-superseded nature of this guardianship; must not be read as implying the law was worthless or evil (a misreading Paul explicitly guards against elsewhere in the chapter), nor collapsed into the generic “law” entry without the specific custodial-until-maturity nuance.
βαπτίζω / βάπτισμα (baptizō / baptisma), Gal 3:27, “as many as were baptized into Christ” — NEW (not previously required by the Romans curriculum’s core passages). Bodo rendering: बाप्तिस्मा (baptisma), a standard transliteration already in wide use in South Asian Christian usage. Risk: Medium — should be clearly distinguished from any household or Kherai purification-washing rite; baptism here signifies incorporation into Christ, not ritual cleansing per se.
οὐκ ἔνι Ἰουδαῖος οὐδὲ Ἕλλην, οὐκ ἔνι δοῦλος οὐδὲ ἐλεύθερος, οὐκ ἔνι ἄρσεν καὶ θῆλυ (Gal 3:28) — the unity formula. Reuses जिहूदी (Jew), introduces δοῦλος/ἐλεύθερος (doulos/eleutheros, “slave/free”) — NEW, anticipated fully in ch. 4-5 below. Contextual meaning: in Christ, these socially defining categories no longer determine standing before God or access to the promise. Risk: High — parallels the baseline’s “Unity of Jews and Gentiles” doctrine (already High risk) but extends it to social class and gender categories; should be taught with the same care the baseline gives to not folding this into contemporary regional identity-politics rhetoric.

Chapter 4 (Galatians 4:1-31) — Adoption, Slavery to the Elemental Spirits, and the Two Covenants (Hagar/Sarah)

υἱοθεσία (huiothesia), Gal 4:5, “adoption as sons” — REUSE — baseline TM. गोसोआव फैनाय. Risk: High (unchanged) — the baseline’s caveat about adoption not being a settled category in Bodo birth-lineage kinship applies with full force here, since Galatians 4 makes the slave/heir contrast (see κληρονόμος below) even more explicit than Romans 8.
Ἀββά ὁ πατήρ (Abba ho patēr), Gal 4:6 — REUSE — baseline TM. अब्बा / आफा (Abba/Father). Risk: High (unchanged) — identical construction to Romans 8:15; per the Theological Consistency Rules, this phrase must render identically across both curricula.
κληρονόμος (klēronomos), Gal 4:1, 7, “heir” — NEW. Literal meaning: “one who inherits, an heir.” Semantic range: legal recipient of an inheritance/estate. English variants: “heir,” “inheritor.” Contextual meaning: the believer’s adopted status carries full inheritance rights, not a probationary or lesser status — the positive counterpart to the slave/son contrast running through the chapter. Bodo rendering (provisional): आबाद लाबग्रा (abad labgra), “one who receives/will receive the inheritance/estate,” or more simply वारिस (waris), a Persian/Urdu-derived loan for “heir/inheritor” widely used across regional Indic languages. Risk: High — inheritance-rights language intersects directly with the strong Bodo cultural emphasis on clan (afad) lineage-based land and property inheritance running through birth descent; the chapter’s claim that adoptive, faith-based sonship carries the same full inheritance rights as birth-sonship needs explicit, careful teaching, since it directly challenges the assumed birth-only inheritance logic of local kinship custom (an intensification of the same risk the baseline already names for adoption).
δοῦλος (doulos), contrasted with υἱός/κληρονόμος throughout ch. 4 — NEW. Literal meaning: “slave, bondservant.” Bodo rendering (provisional): गुलाम (gulam), a widely attested Persian/Urdu loan for “slave.” Risk: Medium — should be kept distinct in register from generic “servant” (सेवक, used for διάκονος above); δοῦλος here specifically names a legally unfree status without inheritance rights, the sharp foil to the chapter’s adoption argument.
στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου (stoicheia tou kosmou), Gal 4:3, 9, “the elemental spirits/basic principles of the world” — NEW, and the single highest-risk new term introduced anywhere in this curriculum. Literal meaning: “the elements/basic components of the world” — in Koine usage this can mean either (a) basic/elementary teachings or (b) personal cosmic-elemental powers/spirits thought to govern earthly life, a live ambiguity among Pauline scholars. Semantic range spans both senses; Paul applies the term to both the Galatians’ pre-Christian pagan worship (4:8-9, “you were enslaved to beings that by nature are not gods”) and, startlingly, to reversion to law-observance (4:9-10, observing “days and months and seasons and years”). English variants: “elemental spirits,” “elemental spiritual powers,” “basic principles,” “elemental things.” Contextual theological meaning: whether cast as literal spirit-powers or as merely elementary religious systems, Paul treats both pagan idolatry and law-observance-as-salvation as forms of the SAME underlying bondage from which Christ has freed believers. Bodo rendering (provisional, with an explicit AVOIDANCE constraint): दुनिया नि गिबि निয়म (duniyani gibi niyom), “the world’s basic/elementary rules,” a deliberately generic descriptive compound. CRITICAL EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION: this compound and any alternative rendering of στοιχεῖα must NOT incorporate the Bodo names of the five Bathou cosmological elements (ha/earth, dwi/water, bar/air, or/fire, okhrang/sky) represented by the sijou plant’s five branches. Any rendering that echoes ha-dwi-bar-or-okhrang terminology would directly and disastrously suggest that Paul is naming the Bathou five-element cosmology itself as the “elemental spirits” of pagan bondage — a reading that, while perhaps not entirely theologically wrong in substance (Paul is indeed describing pre-Christian elemental religion as bondage), would be catastrophic pastorally and apologetically if it appeared to single out Bathou tradition by name using its own sacred vocabulary, rather than describing the general category of elemental/cosmic religion Paul has in view. Risk: CRITICAL — mandatory human theologian review for every occurrence; this term should be added explicitly to the Phase 2 AI instruction set’s escalation list and forbidden-substitution list for the Galatians curriculum specifically.
Ἁγὰρ / Σάρρα (Hagar / Sarra), Gal 4:21-31 — NEW proper names + allegorical framework. Standard transliterations: हागार (Hagar), सारा (Sarah). Contextual meaning: Paul allegorizes Genesis 16-21 (Hagar the slave-woman/Ishmael vs. Sarah the free woman/Isaac) as two covenants — slavery under the law vs. freedom through promise. Risk: Medium — like the Abraham material in ch. 3, this requires substantial Old Testament narrative background not otherwise available to hearers; the allegorical method itself (using a historical narrative as a symbolic argument) is also a genre unfamiliar to oral Bathou tradition and should be explained as a distinctly Pauline argumentative technique, not assumed to be self-evident.
ἡ ἄνω Ἰερουσαλήμ (hē anō Ierousalēm), Gal 4:26, “the Jerusalem above” — NEW. Bodo rendering (provisional): उফरनি यरूशलेম (uphorni Jerusalem), “the Jerusalem above/heavenly Jerusalem.” Risk: Medium — an eschatological, heavenly-city concept; must be explicitly distinguished, as the baseline already flags for “kingdom of God,” from any territorial or ethnic-political reading of “Jerusalem” or “Israel,” given the Bodoland Territorial Region’s own strong contemporary association of ethnic identity with territorial claims.

Chapter 5 (Galatians 5:1-26) — Freedom, Flesh versus Spirit, and the Fruit of the Spirit

ἐλευθερία (eleutheria), Gal 5:1, 13, “freedom, liberty” — NEW, and the doctrine-title term for “Freedom in Christ.” Literal meaning: “freedom, liberty, the state of a free person” (as opposed to a slave — the same δοῦλος/ἐλεύθερος contrast from 3:28 and ch. 4). Semantic range: civil/social freedom (opposite of slavery) applied metaphorically-theologically to freedom from the law’s condemning power and from sin’s dominion. English variants: “freedom,” “liberty.” Contextual meaning: “For freedom Christ has set us free… do not submit again to a yoke of slavery” (5:1) — the positive banner-statement summarizing chs. 3-4’s slave/heir argument. Bodo rendering (provisional, RECOMMENDED): स्वाधीनता (swadhinota), a Sanskrit/Hindi-derived loan meaning “freedom, independence,” in wide secular/political use across the region (e.g., for freedom from colonial rule) rather than a religious-liberation term. Risk: High — deliberately AVOID any cognate of मुक्ति/मोक्ष (mukti/moksha): both share the Sanskrit root मुच् (“to release”) and मोक्ष is specifically Brahma Dharma’s own reform-era liberation-from-the-rebirth-cycle category (explicitly forbidden already by the baseline for “salvation”). Using स्वाधीनता instead sidesteps this collision, but requires its own translator note explaining that Galatians’ “freedom” is not political independence either — it is freedom from the law’s condemnation and sin’s dominion, for the purpose of loving service (5:13), not autonomous self-rule. This term should be confirmed by a Bodo-speaking theologian before wide deployment.
δουλεία (douleia), Gal 5:1, “a yoke of slavery” — NEW. Bodo rendering: दासत्व (dasatwa), “slavery, servitude” (Sanskrit loan), or गुलामी (gulami) (parallel to δοῦλος above). Risk: Medium — the negative foil to ἐλευθερία; low independent risk beyond consistency with the δοῦλος entry in ch. 4.
ἐξέπεσατε τῆς χάριτος (exepesate tēs charitos), Gal 5:4, “fallen from grace” — reuses REUSE — baseline TM मोफादांनाय दान (grace, Critical). Contextual meaning: seeking justification through law-keeping (specifically circumcision, in context) constitutes a fall away from the grace-basis of standing with God. Risk: Critical (inherited) — another explicit grace-vs-works contrast passage requiring mandatory escalation per the existing AI instruction set rule.
σάρξ (sarx), now used throughout 5:13-24 in its fully negative ethical sense: “the flesh” as the sin-inclined, self-oriented aspect of human nature in active conflict with the Spirit. This is the sense anticipated but not fully developed at 2:16/2:20 above. Contextual theological meaning: 5:17, “the flesh desires against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other” — establishes the doctrine “Flesh versus Spirit” as a central ethical framework for the rest of the letter. Bodo rendering: continues to use गाव (gao), but MUST be accompanied by a translator note in every occurrence within 5:13-24 specifying “flesh” here names the sin-oriented disposition of human nature, not the neutral physical body-sense used at 2:20. Risk: High — the single Bodo lexeme’s necessary semantic stretch across three distinct senses (idiomatic “no one” at 2:16, neutral “bodily life” at 2:20, and now morally-loaded “sinful nature” at 5:13-24) is this curriculum’s clearest example of a term requiring consistent contextual flagging rather than a single fixed gloss.
τὰ ἔργα τῆς σαρκός (ta erga tēs sarkos), Gal 5:19-21, “the works of the flesh” (a vice-list: πορνεία “sexual immorality,” ἀκαθαρσία “impurity,” ἀσέλγεια “debauchery,” εἰδωλολατρία “idolatry,” φαρμακεία “sorcery,” ἔχθραι “enmity,” ἔρις “strife,” ζῆλος “jealousy,” θυμοί “fits of anger,” ἐριθεῖαι “rivalries,” διχοστασίαι “dissensions,” αἱρέσεις “factions,” φθόνοι “envy,” μέθαι “drunkenness,” κῶμοι “orgies”) — NEW composite entry. Bodo rendering: गावनि गुनथि (gaoni gunthi), “deeds/works of the flesh,” reusing गुनथि exactly as in the ch. 2 ἔργα νόμου entry (deliberately parallel construction — both “works of the law” and “works of the flesh” are named with गुनथि to preserve Paul’s own rhetorical parallel between the two false paths). Risk: High — of particular note within this list, εἰδωλολατρία (“idolatry”) and φαρμακεία (“sorcery,” root of English “pharmacy,” referring to magical use of potions/drugs) require specific translator flags: idolatry must be taught as covering any worship directed to Bathoubwrai, the Kherai pantheon, or ancestral household spirits alongside more generic “idol” categories, and φαρμακεία must be linked to the same real, currently-practiced folk sorcery/ओझा-mediated ritual categories already flagged for ἐβασκάνατε and κατάρα above — this list is not abstract vice-naming but names practices genuinely present in the target culture’s religious landscape, and should receive theologian input on culturally accurate equivalents for each item rather than generic translation.
ὁ καρπὸς τοῦ πνεύματος (ho karpos tou pneumatos), Gal 5:22-23, “the fruit of the Spirit” (ἀγάπη “love,” χαρά “joy,” εἰρήνη “peace,” μακροθυμία “patience,” χρηστότης “kindness,” ἀγαθωσύνη “goodness,” πίστις “faithfulness,” πραΰτης “gentleness,” ἐγκράτεια “self-control”) — NEW composite entry, doctrine: “Fruit of the Spirit.” Reuses REUSE — baseline TM पबित्र आत्था (Holy Spirit, Critical) + newly proposed फल (phal), “fruit” (Sanskrit loan, in ordinary use). Bodo rendering: पबित्र आत्मानि फल (pobitro aatmani phal), “fruit of the Holy Spirit,” deliberately parallel in construction to the baseline’s आत्मानि दान (spiritual gifts). Risk: Medium — distinguish from आत्मानि दान (which names Spirit-given enablements for ministry, 1 Corinthians/Romans 12 territory) — फल here names Spirit-produced character, a different category the curriculum should keep terminologically distinct. Two items within the list deserve individual flags: ἀγάπη (love) reuses the प्रेम rendering proposed at 2:20 above (High risk, same rationale); πίστις (here meaning “faithfulness,” a character trait, NOT saving faith) reuses बिश्वास but requires an explicit translator note that this occurrence of बिश्वास means trustworthy, reliable character, NOT the saving-faith sense fixed everywhere else in the glossary — a genuine homonym-risk within the Bodo rendering itself that must be flagged wherever it recurs.
πίστις δι’ ἀγάπης ἐνεργουμένη (pistis di’ agapēs energoumenē), Gal 5:6, “faith working through love” — NEW compound phrase, and its own named doctrine (“Faith Working through Love”). Combines reused बिश्वास (faith) + newly proposed प्रेम (love) + ἐνεργουμένη (“working, being made effective,” from ἐνεργέω, root of English “energy”). Bodo rendering (provisional): प्रेमजों बिश्वास काम खालामो (premjw biswas kaam khalamo), “faith works/is active through/by means of love.” Risk: High — this short phrase functions as a hinge summarizing the entire letter’s argument (justification is by faith alone, yet genuine faith inevitably expresses itself in love, cf. ch. 5’s ethical instruction and ch. 6’s practical exhortations); must be taught carefully so that “faith working through love” is not misheard as a return to works-based righteousness (love as a new “work” that justifies) — love is faith’s necessary fruit and expression, not a supplementary ground of standing before God. Should be cross-referenced explicitly with the core passage’s justification-by-faith-not-works-of-law argument.
ἀλλήλους δάκνετε καὶ κατεσθίετε (allēlous daknete kai katesthiete), Gal 5:15, “biting and devouring one another” — NEW idiom (animal-conflict metaphor for destructive communal strife). Bodo rendering: a natural Bodo equivalent for mutual destructive conflict, e.g. गोबां-गोबां घुरखांनाय (gwbang-gwbang ghurokhannai), “biting/tearing at one another.” Risk: Low — vivid but low doctrinal-collision risk; primarily a matter of idiomatic naturalness per the AI instruction set’s idiom-handling rule.

Chapter 6 (Galatians 6:1-18) — Bearing Burdens, Sowing and Reaping, and the New Creation

βαστάζετε (bastazete) / βάρη (barē), Gal 6:2, 5, “bear one another’s burdens” — NEW, doctrine: “Bearing One Another’s Burdens.” Literal meaning of βάρος: “weight, load, burden.” Bodo rendering (provisional): एकबेनि बजन बिफांदो लांबो (ekbeni bojon biphando lango), “let us carry one another’s burden,” using बजन (bojon), a common regional loanword for “weight/burden.” Risk: Low-Medium — a mutual-care instruction with low comparative-religion collision risk, though should be distinguished from any notion of ritually transferable merit or guilt (avoid any phrasing suggesting one person’s sin/debt can be religiously “absorbed” by another in a merit-transfer sense reminiscent of accumulated-पुण्य thinking).
καταρτίζετε (katartizete), Gal 6:1, “restore [a fallen brother] gently” — NEW. Bodo rendering (provisional): फिन सुद्ध खालামनাय (phin sudho khalamnai), “make right/restore again.” Risk: Low.
σπείρῃ / θερίσει (speirē / therisei), Gal 6:7-8, “whatever one sows, that he will also reap” — NEW, and a high-risk agricultural metaphor given local context. Literal meaning: “to sow [seed]” / “to reap [harvest].” Semantic range: moral-spiritual cause-and-effect, framed through an agricultural image (“sowing to the flesh” reaps corruption; “sowing to the Spirit” reaps eternal life). English variants: “sow/reap.” Bodo rendering (provisional): बुनाय (bunai, “to sow/plant”) and दाननाय (dannai, “to harvest/reap”), both ordinary Bodo agrarian vocabulary given rice cultivation’s centrality to Bodo life. Risk: High — precisely because sowing and harvest imagery is so culturally central, it carries a specific collision risk with the Kherai puja’s veneration of Mainao, the goddess of wealth and rice, whose favor is traditionally sought to secure a good harvest; Paul’s sowing/reaping metaphor is about moral-spiritual cause-and-effect (what kind of life one cultivates), not a fertility-ritual appeal for agricultural abundance, and this distinction should be made explicit in translator notes rather than left for readers to infer, given how easily the vivid natural resonance could pull the metaphor toward its literal agricultural/ritual associations instead of Paul’s ethical point.
καινὴ κτίσις (kainē ktisis), Gal 6:15, “a new creation” — NEW, CRITICAL — doctrine: “Circumcision and the New Creation.” Literal meaning: “new creation/creature.” Semantic range: a radically new state of being brought about by union with Christ, replacing the old circumcision/uncircumcision distinction as what actually matters. English variants: “new creation,” “new creature.” Bodo rendering (provisional): नতুन সৃষ্টি (notun sristi), “new creation,” combining the Assamese/Bengali-shared loan नতুन (“new”) with the Sanskrit loan सৃষ্টि (“creation”). Risk: Critical — सৃष्टि carries strong pre-existing associations with Hindu-influenced cosmological creation/dissolution cycles absorbed into Brahma Dharma’s reform cosmology; this term must be explicitly taught as a ONE-TIME, non-cyclical, definitive transformation of the individual believer’s identity and standing through union with Christ (paralleling the baseline’s insistence that resurrection is bodily/historical/once-for-all, never cyclical rebirth) — NOT a stage within any cosmic creation-and-dissolution cycle. Mandatory theologian review; should be added to the Galatians-specific escalation list alongside στοιχεῖα above.
καύχημα / καυχάομαι (kauchēma / kauchaomai), Gal 6:4, 13-14, “boasting” (negatively, in circumcision/the flesh; positively, “far be it from me to boast except in the cross”) — NEW. Bodo rendering (provisional): गर्ब (garbo), “pride, boast” (Sanskrit loan), verb form गर्ब खालামনাय (garbo khalamnai). Risk: High — Paul’s contrast between illegitimate boasting (in one’s own religious performance or others’ outward conformity) and legitimate boasting (only in Christ’s cross) intersects directly with the strong honor/status culture surrounding Bodo clan (afad) lineage-pride and religious-community standing; this contrast should be taught with that cultural parallel explicitly named, not left as an abstract moral point.
τὰ στίγματα τοῦ Ἰησοῦ (ta stigmata tou Iēsou), Gal 6:17, “I bear on my body the marks of Jesus” — NEW. Literal meaning: “brand-marks, tattoo-marks” (originally marks of slave-ownership or military/religious devotion in the Greco-Roman world). Bodo rendering (provisional): जिसुनि दागि (Jisuni dagi), “the marks/scars of Jesus,” using दागि (“mark, scar, brand”). Risk: Medium — refers to Paul’s actual physical scars from persecution suffered for the gospel (cf. 2 Corinthians 11:23-25), not a ritual tattoo, brand, or decorative body-marking practice; should be clarified as literal battle-scars of gospel ministry, distinguished from any ritual scarification or clan-marking practice that may carry different cultural meaning locally.
οἱ οἰκεῖοι τῆς πίστεως (hoi oikeioi tēs pisteōs), Gal 6:10, “the household of faith” — NEW compound, built on reused बिश्वास. Bodo rendering: बिश्वासनि परिवार (biswasni paribar), “family of faith,” using परिवार (“family,” Sanskrit/Hindi loan). Risk: Low-Medium — a warm relational term for the church as extended spiritual family; should reinforce rather than compete with the baseline’s मण्डली (church) and गोसो जोंथानाय (fellowship) terms, used for a related but distinct nuance (household-like mutual obligation specifically toward fellow believers, “especially” — 6:10 — though not exclusively).

Summary of Chapter Coverage

Chapter	New Terms Introduced	Reused Baseline Terms (Highlights)
1	εὐαγγέλιον-distortion, ἀνάθεμα, ἀποκάλυψις, ζηλωτής, παράδοσις, διωγμός	ἀπόστολος, εὐαγγέλιον, χάρις, εἰρήνη, “set apart”
2:1-14	περιτομή, ψευδάδελφοι, ἀλήθεια τοῦ εὐαγγελίου, στῦλοι, ὑπόκρισις	γαρ/gospel terms, ἔθνη, Ἰουδαῖοι
2:15-21 (CORE)	ἔργα νόμου, μὴ γένοιτο, παραβάτης, συσταυρόω, ἀγάπη, παραδίδωμι ἑαυτόν, ἀθετέω, δωρεάν (contextual)	δικαιοῦται, πίστις, νόμος, σάρξ (introduced), χάρις, δικαιοσύνη, υἱὸς θεοῦ
3	ἐβασκάνατε, Ἀβραάμ, κατάρα, ἐξαγοράζω, ἐπαγγελία, σπέρμα, μεσίτης, παιδαγωγός, βαπτίζω, δοῦλος/ἐλεύθερος	ἐλογίσθη εἰς δικαιοσύνην (imputed righteousness)
4	κληρονόμος, δοῦλος, στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου (Critical), Ἁγάρ/Σάρρα, ἡ ἄνω Ἰερουσαλήμ	υἱοθεσία, Ἀββά ὁ πατήρ
5	ἐλευθερία, δουλεία, ἔργα τῆς σαρκός, καρπὸς τοῦ πνεύματος, πίστις διʼ ἀγάπης ἐνεργουμένη, biting/devouring idiom	χάρις (fallen from), σάρξ (ethical sense), πνεῦμα ἅγιον
6	βάρος/βαστάζω, καταρτίζω, σπείρω/θερίζω, καινὴ κτίσις (Critical), καύχημα, στίγματα, οἰκεῖοι τῆς πίστεως	χάρις (closing benediction), περιτομή

No chapter of Galatians was found to introduce zero new theological vocabulary; the letter’s argumentative density (especially chs. 3-4’s Abraham/law material and ch. 5’s flesh/Spirit material) means every chapter contributes load-bearing terms requiring dedicated treatment.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.