Doctrine Analysis
Doctrine Analysis: 2 Peter (French)
Purpose
This document maps every doctrine identified in doctrine_risk_registry.json onto its supporting passages across the full text of 2 Peter (chapters 1–3), organized chapter by chapter for translator and reviewer navigation, followed by a consolidated matrix. Risk levels, French-specific translation risk notes, and review routing are reproduced from the registry without alteration — this document does not introduce new risk tiers, only maps existing ones onto full-book coverage.
Risk tiers (per baseline doctrine_risk_registry.json definitions, reused exactly):
- Critical — mistranslation destroys essential doctrine; human theologian review, every occurrence.
- High — significant theological confusion or denominational-conflation risk; human theologian review.
- Medium — reduces clarity but preserves essential meaning; native speaker review recommended.
- Low — minor imprecision; automated review sufficient.
Chapter 1 (2 Pierre 1:1–21) — Foundations: Calling, Character, and Apostolic Testimony
Chapter 1 introduces the letter’s greeting, the doctrine of the believer’s participation in the divine nature, the call to progressive Christian virtue, and — in the core passage (1:16–21) — Peter’s defense of apostolic eyewitness testimony and the divine origin of prophetic Scripture. This chapter carries the highest concentration of Critical-tier doctrine in the book.
| Doctrine | Supporting Passages (2 Peter) | Risk | Translation Risk (French-specific) | Review Routing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grace and Peace Greeting | 1:2 | Low | Standard epistolary greeting, doctrinally identical to Romains 1:7; stable, non-disputed vocabulary reused exactly from baseline. | Automated review |
| Deity of Christ | 1:1 | Critical | The Granville Sharp construction “notre Dieu et Sauveur Jésus-Christ” must be rendered so French syntax preserves the single-referent reading; inserting “du” before “Sauveur” would wrongly split the phrase into two persons. | Human theologian |
| Christ as Savior | 1:1, 1:11 | High | Secular/pop-cultural French “le sauveur” (sports, financial rescue) risks flattening the exclusive, cosmic saving Lordship into a situational hero-rescuer; fixed formula “Seigneur et Sauveur” demands strict consistency. | Human theologian |
| Lordship of Christ | 1:2, 1:8, 1:11, 1:14, 1:16 | High | ”Seigneur” carries feudal-historical resonance in French; risk of a distant, archaic-title reading, amplified by constant recurrence in the fixed formula. | Human theologian |
| Divine Nature and Escaping Corruption | 1:3-4 | Critical | ”Participer à la nature divine” can be read through Orthodox/Catholic mystical théosis (ontological divinization) or Reformed/evangelical moral-renewal categories; must never imply believers become divine in essence — Creator/creature distinction must remain intact. | Human theologian |
| Growing in Christian Virtue | 1:5-8 | High | ”Vertu” risks narrowing to female chastity (“perdre sa vertu”) or a Catholic scholastic cardinal/theological-virtues framing, foreign to Peter’s dynamic, courage-inflected sense. | Human theologian |
| Sanctified Living and Cleansing from Past Sin | 1:6-9 | Medium | ”Purification” risks a ritual/sacramental reading (confession, absolution) given French Catholic penitential vocabulary; must clarify once-for-all forgiveness at conversion, not an ongoing ritual act. | Native speaker review |
| Divine Calling and Election | 1:10 | High | ”Élection” is the everyday French word for political/democratic elections, risking a competitive or merit-based misreading of God’s sovereign, gracious choice; direct reuse point from the Romans baseline. | Human theologian |
| Assurance of Standing Firm | 1:10 | Medium | Risk that French readers hear assurance against “stumbling” as self-achieved moral perfection rather than confidence flowing from divine calling. | Native speaker review |
| Remembrance and Exhortation | 1:12-15 | Low | Straightforward pastoral purpose statement; “rappeler” carries no doctrinal ambiguity in French. | Automated review |
| Reliability and Inspiration of Scripture (core passage) | 1:16-21 | Critical | ”Ἰδίας ἐπιλύσεως” (1:20) is 2 Peter’s own Trent-vs-Reformation flashpoint; historic “private interpretation” rendering has been used in French Catholic apologetics against believers’ individual reading of Scripture, though the Greek concerns the prophecy’s origin, not the reader’s interpretive act. | Human theologian |
| Apostolic Eyewitness Testimony | 1:16-18 | Medium | French “fable” for μῦθος risks the La Fontaine/Aesop children’s-tale register, softening Peter’s polemical “dangerous fabrication” sense. | Native speaker review |
| Sonship of Christ | 1:17 | Critical | ”Mon Fils bien-aimé” must never drift toward “mon fils préféré,” which reduces the Father’s declaration to ordinary parental favoritism rather than unique, eternal Sonship. | Human theologian |
| Certainty of Christ’s Return (preview via Transfiguration) | 1:16 | High | The Transfiguration functions as a preview/guarantee of the “power and coming” (parousia) later defended in ch. 3; “avènement” risks collapse into secular “dawning of an era” usage or the liturgical “l’Avent.” | Human theologian |
Chapter 1 note: every doctrine in this chapter is either newly introduced (divine nature, virtue list, calling/election, apostolic testimony, Scripture’s origin, Sonship) or first-occurrence of a recurring formula (Lord/Savior). No content in chapter 1 is doctrinally inert; all listed items require carry-forward consistency into chapters 2–3.
Chapter 2 (2 Pierre 2:1–22) — False Teachers and Historical Judgment
Chapter 2 turns to polemic: false teachers who deny the Master who bought them, illustrated by three OT judgment narratives (fallen angels, the Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah) and the cautionary figure of Balaam.
| Doctrine | Supporting Passages (2 Peter) | Risk | Translation Risk (French-specific) | Review Routing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| False Teachers and Their Judgment | 2:1-3, 2:9, 2:12-13 | High | ”Hérésies” is freighted with French ecclesiastical history (the Inquisition, the guerres de religion, historic Catholic polemics labeling French Protestants “hérétiques”); risks an institutional-deviance reading rather than Peter’s doctrinal-content concern (denial of Christ, moral license). | Human theologian |
| Extent of Christ’s Redemption | 2:1 | High | ”Despotēs” cannot be rendered by its French cognate “despote” (exclusively pejorative, tyrant/dictator, in modern French); “Maître souverain” required instead — a distinct lexical choice from the baseline’s separate rejection of “maître” for kyrios/Seigneur. | Human theologian |
| Historical Examples of Divine Judgment | 2:4-8, 2:15-16 | Medium | Narrative content carries low collision risk overall, but the embedded term ταρταρώσας (“cast into Tartarus”) carries Critical-level risk if transliterated “Tartare” (collides absurdly with the culinary term steak tartare); any segment containing this term must escalate to theologian review regardless of the doctrine’s overall Medium rating. | Native speaker review (escalate to theologian for the Tartarus clause specifically) |
Chapter 2 note: although chapter 2 introduces only three doctrine entries at the registry level, it is the densest chapter for vocabulary-collision risk (§C of the core glossary: hérésies, despotēs, ταρταρώσας, δοῦλοι τῆς φθορᾶς). Chapter 2 also silently carries forward “Lord/Savior” formula consistency (2:20’s “Seigneur et Sauveur”) and must not be treated as doctrinally lighter than its single-digit doctrine count suggests.
Chapter 3 (2 Pierre 3:1–18) — The Day of the Lord, Patience, and Final Exhortation
Chapter 3 addresses the scoffers who deny Christ’s coming, grounds the delay in God’s patience and desire for repentance, describes the Day of the Lord’s cosmic judgment and the promised new creation, and closes with a warning about misreading Scripture (Paul’s letters) and a final doxology.
| Doctrine | Supporting Passages (2 Peter) | Risk | Translation Risk (French-specific) | Review Routing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remembrance and Exhortation | 3:1-2 | Low | Recurs from ch. 1; no new doctrinal ambiguity. | Automated review |
| Certainty of Christ’s Return | 3:3-4, 3:9-10 | High | Recurs from ch. 1 (1:16); the scoffers’ denial (3:4, “où est la promesse de son avènement?”) makes consistent, non-metaphorical rendering of “avènement”/“promesse” especially load-bearing here. | Human theologian |
| Mockery and the Last Days | 3:3-4 | Medium | ”Moqueurs”/“derniers jours” carry low lexical collision risk; the risk is secular France’s default skepticism toward apocalyptic claims understating the doctrinal seriousness Peter assigns to end-time mockery. | Native speaker review |
| Patience of God’s Timing | 3:8-9, 3:15 | High | ”Patience” (μακροθυμία, God’s forbearance) must be kept lexically distinct from ch. 1’s “persévérance” (ὑπομονή, human endurance); collapsing the two would blur God’s sovereign forbearance with human effort across the whole curriculum. | Human theologian |
| God’s Desire for Universal Repentance | 3:9 | High | Parallels the baseline’s Calvinist/Arminian tension around “élection”/“appel efficace” in Romans 9–11; “ne voulant pas qu’aucun périsse” must not be softened or sharpened to resolve the extent-of-God’s-will debate beyond the text. | Human theologian |
| Day of the Lord and Final Judgment | 3:7, 3:10, 3:12 | Critical | MAJOR FRENCH COLLISION: “le jour du Seigneur” is the standard French Catholic and secular designation for Sunday (“le dimanche, jour du Seigneur”); every occurrence requires an explicit clarifying gloss distinguishing the eschatological Day of Judgment from weekly worship. | Human theologian |
| Cosmic Dissolution and New Creation | 3:10, 3:12-13 | Medium | ”Éléments” evokes the ancient/alchemical “quatre éléments” (still culturally present via astrology) or the chemistry periodic table; secular naturalism risks reading “seront dissous” as metaphorical rather than a literal cosmic claim. | Native speaker review |
| Holiness in View of the Day of the Lord | 3:11, 3:14 | Medium | The OT sacrificial-purity background behind “sans tache et sans défaut” is unfamiliar to a low-OT-literacy French readership and risks flattening into generic “good behavior” language. | Native speaker review |
| Proper Handling of Scripture | 3:16 | Medium | The warning against “twisting” Paul’s letters is the reader-side companion to 1:20’s origination warning; must be kept distinct from it in exposition, not collapsed into one undifferentiated “don’t misread the Bible” idea. | Native speaker review |
| Christ as Savior (formula continuation) | 3:2, 3:18 | High | Recurs from ch. 1; closing doxology (3:18) is the book’s final and most quotable occurrence of “Seigneur et Sauveur” — consistency here is pastorally high-stakes. | Human theologian |
| Lordship of Christ (formula continuation) | 3:2, 3:18 | High | Recurs from ch. 1; same feudal-resonance caution applies at the book’s climactic doxology. | Human theologian |
Chapter 3 note: chapter 3 concentrates the book’s other Critical-tier doctrine (Day of the Lord) alongside the highest number of interlocking High-tier doctrines (return, patience, repentance, Savior/Lord formula), making it the second most doctrinally dense chapter after chapter 1.
Cross-Chapter Recurring Doctrines
The following doctrines are not confined to a single chapter and require identical rendering wherever they recur; translators and reviewers must treat each occurrence as linked, not independent:
| Doctrine | Chapter 1 | Chapter 2 | Chapter 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lordship of Christ | 1:2, 1:8, 1:11, 1:14, 1:16 | 2:20 | 3:2, 3:18 |
| Christ as Savior | 1:1, 1:11 | 2:20 | 3:2, 3:18 |
| Certainty of Christ’s Return | 1:16 (Transfiguration preview) | — | 3:3-4, 3:9-10 |
| Remembrance and Exhortation | 1:12-15 | — | 3:1-2 |
No chapter of 2 Peter is doctrine-free; every chapter is confirmed reviewed above with either newly introduced doctrines (chs. 1–2) or the resolution/climax of doctrines introduced earlier (ch. 3).
Consolidated Doctrine Matrix (All 24 Doctrines, Full Book)
| # | Doctrine | Primary Passages | Risk | Review Routing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reliability and Inspiration of Scripture | 1:16-21, 3:2, 3:15-16 | Critical | Human theologian |
| 2 | Deity of Christ | 1:1, 1:11, 3:18 | Critical | Human theologian |
| 3 | Sonship of Christ | 1:17 | Critical | Human theologian |
| 4 | Day of the Lord and Final Judgment | 3:7, 3:10, 3:12 | Critical | Human theologian |
| 5 | Divine Nature and Escaping Corruption | 1:3-4 | Critical | Human theologian |
| 6 | Lordship of Christ | 1:2,1:8,1:11,1:14,1:16, 2:20, 3:2,3:18 | High | Human theologian |
| 7 | Christ as Savior | 1:1,1:11, 2:20, 3:2,3:18 | High | Human theologian |
| 8 | Certainty of Christ’s Return | 1:16, 3:3-4, 3:9-10 | High | Human theologian |
| 9 | Patience of God’s Timing | 3:8-9, 3:15 | High | Human theologian |
| 10 | God’s Desire for Universal Repentance | 3:9 | High | Human theologian |
| 11 | Growing in Christian Virtue | 1:5-8 | High | Human theologian |
| 12 | Divine Calling and Election | 1:10 | High | Human theologian |
| 13 | False Teachers and Their Judgment | 2:1-3, 2:9, 2:12-13 | High | Human theologian |
| 14 | Extent of Christ’s Redemption | 2:1 | High | Human theologian |
| 15 | Apostolic Eyewitness Testimony | 1:16-18 | Medium | Native speaker review |
| 16 | Proper Handling of Scripture | 3:16 | Medium | Native speaker review |
| 17 | Cosmic Dissolution and New Creation | 3:10, 3:12-13 | Medium | Native speaker review |
| 18 | Assurance of Standing Firm | 1:10, 3:17 | Medium | Native speaker review |
| 19 | Historical Examples of Divine Judgment | 2:4-8, 2:15-16 | Medium | Native speaker review |
| 20 | Holiness in View of the Day of the Lord | 3:11, 3:14 | Medium | Native speaker review |
| 21 | Mockery and the Last Days | 3:3-4 | Medium | Native speaker review |
| 22 | Sanctified Living and Cleansing from Past Sin | 1:6-9 | Medium | Native speaker review |
| 23 | Grace and Peace Greeting | 1:2 | Low | Automated review |
| 24 | Remembrance and Exhortation | 1:12-15, 3:1-2 | Low | Automated review |
Risk Summary (must match doctrine_risk_registry.json)
| Tier | Count | Review Routing |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | 5 | Human theologian (every occurrence) |
| High | 9 | Human theologian |
| Medium | 8 | Native speaker review |
| Low | 2 | Automated review |
| Total | 24 | 14 theologian / 8 native speaker / 2 automated |
This matches the registry’s risk_summary block exactly: Critical 5, High 9, Medium 8, Low 2; 14 requiring theologian review, 8 requiring native speaker review, 2 automated-only.
This document is derived from and must remain synchronized with assets/doctrine_risk_registry.json (version 1) and extends the baseline Romans doctrine analysis methodology to full-book coverage of 2 Peter 1–3.
Critical Risk Doctrines
The Reliability and Inspiration of Scripture
French name: la fiabilité et l’inspiration de l’Écriture
Key terms: prophetic word, Scripture, own interpretation, carried along by the Holy Spirit, eyewitnesses
Review routing: Human theologian
The verse’s own phrase ‘ἰδίας ἐπιλύσεως’ (2 Pierre 1:20) is 2 Peter’s version of a Trent-vs-Reformation flashpoint: the historic KJV ‘private interpretation’ rendering has been used in French Catholic apologetics against the principle that believers may read Scripture apart from magisterial authority, even though the Greek concerns the prophet’s origination of the message, not the reader’s later interpretive act. Must render as concerning the prophecy’s source, never the reader’s interpretive freedom.
Deity of Christ
French name: la divinité du Christ
Key terms: God and Savior, Lord
Review routing: Human theologian
The Granville Sharp construction ‘notre Dieu et Sauveur Jésus-Christ’ (1:1) must be rendered so French syntax preserves the single-referent reading; inserting ‘du’ before ‘Sauveur’ would wrongly split the phrase into two persons (God the Father and a separate Savior), destroying the verse’s direct affirmation of Christ’s full deity.
Sonship of Christ
French name: la filiation du Christ
Key terms: my beloved Son, well pleased
Review routing: Human theologian
‘Mon Fils bien-aimé’ must never drift toward ‘mon fils préféré,’ which in French reduces the Father’s declaration to ordinary parental favoritism among several children rather than the Son’s unique, eternal Sonship — the same Critical concern as the baseline’s ‘Fils de Dieu’ doctrine.
The Day of the Lord and Final Judgment
French name: le jour du Seigneur et le jugement final
Key terms: Day of the Lord, judgment, elements dissolved
Review routing: Human theologian
MAJOR FRENCH COLLISION: ‘le jour du Seigneur’ is the standard French Catholic and secular designation for Sunday, rooted in catechesis (‘le dimanche, jour du Seigneur’). Without an explicit clarifying gloss at every occurrence, French readers will default to the familiar weekly-worship-day meaning rather than the intended one-time, final, eschatological Day of Judgment.
Divine Nature and Escaping Corruption
French name: la participation à la nature divine et l’échappée à la corruption
Key terms: partakers of the divine nature, corruption, divine power
Review routing: Human theologian
This curriculum’s single highest-risk phrase: ‘participer à la nature divine’ can be read through Eastern Orthodox/Catholic mystical théosis (ontological divinization) or through Reformed/evangelical moral-renewal categories — the same French words carry genuinely divergent doctrinal freight. Must never be taught to imply believers become divine in essence; the Creator/creature distinction must remain intact.
High Risk Doctrines
Lordship of Christ
French name: la seigneurie du Christ
Key terms: Lord, Lord and Savior
Review routing: Human theologian
Reuses the baseline caution that ‘Seigneur’ carries feudal-historical resonance in French, risking a distant, archaic-title reading; the risk is amplified in 2 Peter because the title recurs constantly in the fixed formula ‘Seigneur et Sauveur,’ demanding unwavering cross-occurrence consistency.
Christ as Savior
French name: le Christ, Sauveur
Key terms: Savior, Lord and Savior
Review routing: Human theologian
Secular/pop-cultural French usage (‘le sauveur’ of a football match, a company’s financial rescuer) flattens ‘Sauveur’ into a situational hero-rescuer rather than the exclusive, cosmic saving Lordship 2 Peter intends; the term’s constant recurrence in a fixed formula makes any inconsistency especially damaging.
The Certainty of Christ’s Return
French name: la certitude du retour du Christ
Key terms: coming/parousia, promise of his coming
Review routing: Human theologian
‘Avènement’ risks collapse into secular ‘dawning of an era’ usage (l’avènement de l’ère numérique) or into the Catholic/Protestant liturgical ‘l’Avent’ (Christ’s first coming), leading readers to conflate the promised personal, bodily, future return with a symbolic new era or a recurring Advent-season commemoration.
Patience of God’s Timing
French name: la patience de Dieu dans son calendrier
Key terms: patience/longsuffering, is not slow
Review routing: Human theologian
‘Patience’ (makrothymia, God’s forbearance in delaying judgment) must be kept lexically distinct from ch. 1’s human ‘persévérance’ (hypomonē, endurance under trial); collapsing the two different Greek words into one French term would blur God’s sovereign forbearance with the believer’s own effort across the whole curriculum.
God’s Desire for Universal Repentance
French name: la volonté de Dieu que tous se repentent
Key terms: not wanting any to perish, repentance
Review routing: Human theologian
Parallels the baseline’s already-flagged Calvinist/Arminian interpretive tension around ‘élection’ and ‘appel efficace’ in Romans 9-11; the French rendering of ‘ne voulant pas qu’aucun périsse’ must not be softened or sharpened to resolve the extent-of-God’s-will debate in either direction beyond what the text itself states.
Growing in Christian Virtue
French name: la croissance dans la vertu chrétienne
Key terms: faith, virtue, knowledge, self-control, perseverance, godliness, brotherly affection, love
Review routing: Human theologian
‘Vertu’ (aretē) carries a live colloquial French risk of narrowing to female chastity (‘perdre sa vertu’) and a competing Catholic scholastic virtue-ethics framing (les vertus cardinales et théologales), both foreign to Peter’s dynamic, courage-inflected sense of active moral excellence.
Divine Calling and Election
French name: l’appel et l’élection divine
Key terms: calling, election, confirm your calling
Review routing: Human theologian
Reuses baseline’s exact caution: ‘élection’ is the everyday French word for political/democratic elections, risking a competitive or merit-based misreading of God’s sovereign, gracious choice — a direct load-bearing reuse point from the Romans baseline.
False Teachers and Their Judgment
French name: les faux enseignants et leur jugement
Key terms: false teachers, destructive heresies, Master who bought them
Review routing: Human theologian
‘Hérésies’ is freighted with French ecclesiastical history — the Inquisition, the guerres de religion, and centuries of Catholic polemics against heterodox movements (including French Protestants historically labeled hérétiques) — risking an institutional-deviance reading rather than Peter’s doctrinal-content concern (denial of Christ, moral license).
Extent of Christ’s Redemption
French name: la portée du rachat opéré par le Christ
Key terms: bought/redeemed, Master/Sovereign Owner
Review routing: Human theologian
‘Despotēs’ cannot be rendered by its French cognate ‘despote,’ which in contemporary French is exclusively pejorative (tyrant/dictator); ‘Maître souverain’ must be used instead, and this distinct-word choice must not be confused with the baseline’s separate rejection of ‘maître’ as a substitute for kyrios/Seigneur.
Medium Risk Doctrines
Apostolic Eyewitness Testimony
French name: le témoignage oculaire des apôtres
Key terms: eyewitnesses, myths, majestic glory, voice from heaven
Review routing: Native speaker review
French ‘fable’ for mythos risks the La Fontaine/Aesop children’s-tale register, softening Peter’s polemical ‘dangerous fabrication’ sense against fabricated religious tales into something quaint.
Proper Handling of Scripture
French name: le bon maniement de l’Écriture
Key terms: twist/distort, hard to understand
Review routing: Native speaker review
The warning against ‘twisting’ Paul’s letters (3:16) is the reader-side companion to 1:20’s origination warning; French exposition must keep these two distinct cautions (origin of prophecy vs. distortion by readers) from collapsing into one undifferentiated ‘don’t misread the Bible’ idea.
Cosmic Dissolution and New Creation
French name: la dissolution cosmique et la nouvelle création
Key terms: elements, dissolved, new heavens and new earth
Review routing: Native speaker review
‘Éléments’ evokes the ancient/alchemical ‘quatre éléments’ (still culturally present via astrology in France) or the periodic table of modern chemistry; secular naturalism also risks reading ‘seront dissous’ as metaphorical change rather than Peter’s literal claim about the physical cosmos.
Assurance of Standing Firm
French name: l’assurance de ne jamais chuter
Key terms: stumble, stability, unstable
Review routing: Native speaker review
Modest risk that French readers hear assurance against ‘stumbling’ as self-achieved moral perfection rather than grounded confidence flowing from divine calling; the vocabulary itself (‘trébucher,’ ‘fermeté’) carries no major collision.
Historical Examples of Divine Judgment
French name: les exemples historiques du jugement divin
Key terms: angels who sinned, flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, Balaam
Review routing: Native speaker review
The narrative content itself carries low collision risk in French, but one embedded term (ταρταρώσας, ‘cast into Tartarus’) carries a Critical-level risk of comic mistranslation if transliterated as ‘Tartare’ (the culinary term); any segment containing this term specifically requires escalation to human theologian review regardless of the doctrine’s overall Medium rating.
Holiness in View of the Day of the Lord
French name: la sainteté dans l’attente du jour du Seigneur
Key terms: spotless and blameless, holy conduct
Review routing: Native speaker review
The OT sacrificial-purity background behind ‘sans tache et sans défaut’ (unblemished offering) is unfamiliar to a low-OT-literacy French readership and risks being flattened into generic ‘good behavior’ language without its sacrificial resonance.
Mockery and the Last Days
French name: la moquerie et les derniers jours
Key terms: scoffers, last days
Review routing: Native speaker review
Vocabulary itself (‘moqueurs,’ ‘derniers jours’) carries low collision risk; the risk lies in secular France’s default skepticism toward apocalyptic claims generally understating the doctrinal seriousness Peter assigns to end-time mockery of Christ’s promised return.
Sanctified Living and Cleansing from Past Sin
French name: la purification des péchés passés et la vie sanctifiée
Key terms: cleansing of former sins, self-control, godliness
Review routing: Native speaker review
‘Purification’ risks a ritual/sacramental reading (confession, absolution) given French Catholic penitential vocabulary and katharismos’s ceremonial background; must clarify this is the once-for-all forgiveness received at conversion, not an ongoing ritual act.
Low Risk Doctrines
Grace and Peace Greeting
French name: la grâce et la paix (salutation)
Key terms: grace and peace, full knowledge of God
Review routing: Automated review
Standard epistolary greeting, doctrinally identical to Romans 1:7; stable, non-disputed vocabulary reused exactly from the baseline.
Remembrance and Exhortation
French name: le rappel et l’exhortation
Key terms: remind, stir up your memory
Review routing: Automated review
Straightforward pastoral purpose statement; ‘rappeler’ carries no doctrinal ambiguity in French.
Referenced passages