Semantic Analysis: Philemon (Greek → French)

Book Coverage Note

Philemon is a single-chapter letter of 25 verses in the Greek New Testament. Per the full-book coverage mandate, this document analyzes every verse of the letter, not only the core passage. The core passage (Philemon 1:8-21) receives full verse-by-verse treatment in Part 1. The remainder of the letter — the salutation/thanksgiving (1:1-7) and the closing requests/greetings (1:22-25) — receives the same term-level treatment in Part 2, organized as sections rather than “chapters” because the book has no chapter divisions beyond chapter 1. No verse of the letter is left unreviewed.

Where a term already carries a settled rendering in the baseline Romans Language Package (translation_memory.json), that rendering is reused exactly and marked “(baseline reuse).” New terms specific to Philemon’s vocabulary of slavery, appeal, and reckoning are analyzed fresh and proposed for addition to translation memory in 08_core_glossary.md.

---

Part 1 — Core Passage Verse-by-Verse Analysis: Philemon 1:8-21

Philemon 1:8

Greek: Διὸ πολλὴν ἐν Χριστῷ παρρησίαν ἔχων ἐπιτάξαι σοι τὸ ἀνῆκον Sense: “Therefore, though I have every right/confidence in Christ to order you to do what is proper…”

• παρρησία (parrhēsia)

  • Transliteration: parrhēsia
  • Literal meaning: freedom/boldness of speech; originally a citizen’s right to speak openly in the assembly
  • Semantic range: boldness, confidence, openness, authority to speak frankly
  • English variants: “boldness” (KJV), “confidence” (ESV/NIV), “authority” (NLT paraphrase)
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul’s apostolic standing in Christ would entitle him to command — this sets up the letter’s central rhetorical move: authority renounced in favor of appeal, modeling grace-motivated (not coerced) obedience.
  • French rendering & risk: “assurance” / “pleine liberté” (proposed: “toute liberté” or “assurance” — no baseline entry). Risk: Medium. French “assurance” can drift toward psychological self-confidence rather than a Christ-given standing; “franchise” (also possible) risks sounding merely like frank speech style. Recommend “toute latitude” or “pleine assurance en Christ” with a translator’s note preserving the legal-rhetorical background (the right to command).

• ἐπιτάξαι (epitaxai, from ἐπιτάσσω)

  • Transliteration: epitassō (infinitive epitaxai)
  • Literal meaning: to command, order, give a directive with authority
  • Semantic range: military/administrative command language
  • English variants: “command” (most versions)
  • Contextual theological meaning: The verb Paul explicitly declines to use on Philemon — establishing the doctrine of Intercession and Appeal: gospel relationships are governed by love-based appeal, not top-down command, even where authority exists.
  • French rendering & risk: “ordonner” / “commander.” Risk: Low. Both are unambiguous in French; the risk is entirely in contrast-management (see παρακαλῶ below), not in this word alone.

• τὸ ἀνῆκον (to anēkon, from ἀνήκω)

  • Transliteration: anēkon
  • Literal meaning: “that which is fitting/proper/due”
  • Semantic range: moral propriety, what is owed by duty
  • English variants: “what is proper/fitting/befitting”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Frames Philemon’s expected action as a matter of Christian duty, yet one Paul chooses to elicit through love rather than obligation.
  • French rendering & risk: “ce qui est convenable” / “ton devoir.” Risk: Low-Medium. “Devoir” risks a legalistic overtone that could undercut the “grace-motivated, not compelled” emphasis of v.14; prefer “ce qui convient” to keep it descriptive rather than obligatory in tone.

---

Philemon 1:9

Greek: διὰ τὴν ἀγάπην μᾶλλον παρακαλῶ, τοιοῦτος ὢν ὡς Παῦλος πρεσβύτης, νυνὶ δὲ καὶ δέσμιος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ

• ἀγάπη (agapē) — (baseline reuse: not in Romans TM as a standalone entry, but the concept underlies “grace” and “obedience_of_faith” entries)

  • Transliteration: agapē
  • Literal meaning: selfless, covenantal love
  • Semantic range: God’s love for humanity; believers’ love for one another; distinguished from erotic (erōs) or mere affection (philia)
  • English variants: “love” (all versions)
  • Contextual theological meaning: the ground and motive Paul appeals to instead of authority — Christian Brotherhood and Grace-Motivated Obedience both flow from this term.
  • French rendering & risk: “amour.” Risk: Low. Stable, unambiguous in formal register; no competing secular drift as severe as English “love” (which can mean romance, hobby-affection, etc.) — French theological “amour” in this collocation (“l’amour,” “par amour”) reads clearly as Christian charity when qualified by context. Recommend adding to translation memory as a Philemon-curriculum term given its doctrinal centrality here.

• παρακαλῶ (parakalō) (baseline reuse: “exhorter” is the baseline TM rendering for the related term “exhort/parakaleō” — Low risk, context-sensitive between entreaty and encouragement)

  • Transliteration: parakaleō
  • Literal meaning: to call alongside; to appeal, urge, comfort, exhort
  • Semantic range: beseech (entreaty), exhort (moral urging), comfort/encourage
  • English variants: “beseech” (KJV), “appeal” (ESV/NIV), “urge” (NLT)
  • Contextual theological meaning: Central verb of the letter’s rhetorical strategy — appeal grounded in love, not command. This is the lexical anchor of the doctrine “Intercession and Appeal on Behalf of Another.”
  • French rendering & risk: “je préfère te supplier” / “je t’exhorte” / “je t’adresse une demande.” Risk: Medium — baseline registry flags this verb as context-sensitive (“supplier” for beseeching, “exhorter/encourager” for building up). In Philemon the sense is a personal, humble appeal rather than congregational edification; recommend “je te prie” or “je fais appel à toi” to avoid the more didactic “exhorter” register used for teaching contexts elsewhere, while remaining consistent with the TM entry’s flexible usage note.

• πρεσβύτης (presbytēs) — TEXTUAL VARIANT NOTE

  • Transliteration: presbytēs (“old man”) vs. the well-attested variant πρεσβευτής (presbeutēs, “ambassador/envoy”)
  • Literal meaning: either “an old man” (presbytēs) or “an ambassador” (presbeutēs) — a one-letter textual difference with real exegetical consequence
  • Semantic range: age-based self-description vs. diplomatic-authority self-description
  • English variants: “aged” (KJV, ESV footnote), “ambassador” (some translations/margins, e.g., NIV footnote)
  • Contextual theological meaning: If “ambassador,” Paul again gestures at an authority he sets aside in favor of appeal (parallel to Ephesians 6:20, “an ambassador in chains”); if “old man,” it is a pathos-based appeal to age and imprisonment together.
  • French rendering & risk: Baseline register (TOB/Bible de Jérusalem/Segond) predominantly follows “vieillard/homme âgé” (old man). Recommend “vieillard” with a translator’s note flagging the “ambassadeur” variant reading for reviewer awareness. Risk: Medium — a translator unaware of the textual variant could silently default to the wrong nuance; flag for native speaker/theologian review.

• δέσμιος (desmios)

  • Transliteration: desmios
  • Literal meaning: a bound one, prisoner, one in chains
  • Semantic range: literal captivity; Paul’s characteristic self-designation “prisoner of Christ Jesus” (also 1:1, 1:9, 1:10, 1:23 as συναιχμάλωτος)
  • English variants: “prisoner”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul grounds his appeal in his own suffering/bound status rather than his apostolic office — note that Philemon, uniquely among Paul’s letters opening a salutation, omits “ἀπόστολος” (apostle) entirely and opens with “δέσμιος” instead (1:1). This is a deliberate rhetorical choice reinforcing appeal-not-command.
  • French rendering & risk: “prisonnier.” Risk: Low. Stable and unambiguous. Note for glossary: distinguish from συναιχμάλωτος (1:23, “fellow-prisoner/fellow-captive,” a stronger military-captivity term) — see Part 2.

---

Philemon 1:10

Greek: παρακαλῶ σε περὶ τοῦ ἐμοῦ τέκνου, ὃν ἐγέννησα ἐν τοῖς δεσμοῖς, Ὀνήσιμον

• τέκνον (teknon)

  • Transliteration: teknon
  • Literal meaning: child, offspring
  • Semantic range: biological child; spiritual child/convert (as here and 1 Cor 4:14-15, Gal 4:19)
  • English variants: “son,” “child”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul claims spiritual paternity over Onesimus through leading him to faith — establishes the intimacy and personal stake behind Paul’s intercession.
  • French rendering & risk: “mon enfant” / “mon fils.” Risk: Low-Medium. “Mon fils” carries a warmer paternal register in French pastoral usage but could read (in a Catholic frame) as echoing a priest’s address to a penitent (“mon fils” in confession); this is a minor, manageable resonance, not disqualifying, but worth a light note for native-speaker review given the confession/repentance themes of the letter (Onesimus’s wrongdoing, v.18).

• ἐγέννησα (egennēsa, from γεννάω)

  • Transliteration: gennaō
  • Literal meaning: to beget, to father, to bring to birth
  • Semantic range: biological fathering; spiritual regeneration/conversion language
  • English variants: “begotten” (KJV), “became father to” (NIV/ESV), “led to Christ” (paraphrase)
  • Contextual theological meaning: Metaphor of spiritual birth through Paul’s gospel ministry — related conceptually to regeneration, though not the technical term for it.
  • French rendering & risk: “j’ai engendré” / “dont je suis devenu le père.” Risk: Medium. Literal “engendré” is doctrinally accurate but can sound clinical/archaic in modern French outside of theological register; recommend “dont je suis devenu le père [spirituel] dans mes chaînes” for clarity, flagging for native-speaker review to confirm register.

• δεσμοῖς (desmois) — plural of the root behind δέσμιος (1:9); “chains/bonds/imprisonment.” Reinforces the letter’s repeated bound-in-Christ motif (1:1, 1:9, 1:10, 1:13). French: “chaînes.” Risk: Low.

• Ὀνήσιμον (Onēsimon) — proper name

  • Transliteration: Onēsimos
  • Literal meaning: the name itself means “useful, profitable, beneficial” (from ὀνίνημι, “to benefit”)
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul builds a sustained wordplay across vv.11 and v.20 on the meaning of this name (ἄχρηστος/εὔχρηστος, “useless/useful”; ὀναίμην, “may I have benefit/joy of you” — an optative from the very same root as the name “Onesimus”). This pun is central to the letter’s rhetorical structure and its Slavery-and-Gospel-Transforming-Power doctrine: a slave once regarded as of no value is now supremely “useful” as a brother.
  • French rendering & risk: “Onésime” (standard French Bible transliteration, stable across Segond/TOB/Jérusalem). Risk: Medium — not in the name itself (Low) but in the loss of the wordplay across the letter, since “Onésime” bears no transparent meaning to a French reader unlike “useful/useless” in the surrounding text. Recommend a translator’s/study note at v.11 and v.20 explicitly explaining the Greek pun, since French cannot reproduce it lexically. This is a curriculum-level (not merely translation-memory) requirement — see doctrine notes in 08.

---

Philemon 1:11

Greek: τὸν ποτέ σοι ἄχρηστον, νυνὶ δὲ σοὶ καὶ ἐμοὶ εὔχρηστον

• ἄχρηστος (achrēstos)

  • Transliteration: achrēstos
  • Literal meaning: useless, unprofitable, of no service
  • Semantic range: economic/practical uselessness; by extension, worthless
  • English variants: “unprofitable” (KJV), “useless” (ESV/NIV)
  • Contextual theological meaning: Describes Onesimus’s former status/conduct (likely as a runaway who wronged his master, v.18) — sets up the gospel-transformation contrast in the same verse.
  • French rendering & risk: “inutile” / “sans profit pour toi.” Risk: Low-Medium. Straightforward, but translators must keep it paired tightly with εὔχρηστον below to preserve the antithesis; losing the antithetical parallelism (common if paraphrased loosely) would blunt the doctrinal point about transformation.

• εὔχρηστος (euchrēstos)

  • Transliteration: euchrēstos
  • Literal meaning: useful, serviceable, profitable
  • Semantic range: practically valuable/beneficial (used elsewhere of ministry usefulness, 2 Tim 2:21, 4:11)
  • English variants: “profitable,” “useful”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Onesimus’s new identity in Christ makes him useful to both Paul and Philemon — a direct outworking of the gospel’s transforming power upon a slave, and (via the Onesimus-name pun) a statement that he is now living up to his own name.
  • French rendering & risk: “utile” / “profitable.” Risk: Medium. Recommend the pairing “inutile … utile” or “sans profit … très profitable” be kept verbally close/parallel in French to preserve the antithesis, and flagged with the wordplay note from v.10.

---

Philemon 1:12

Greek: ὃν ἀνέπεμψά σοι, αὐτόν, τοῦτ᾽ ἔστιν τὰ ἐμὰ σπλάγχνα

• ἀνέπεμψα (anepempsa, from ἀναπέμπω)

  • Transliteration: anapempō
  • Literal meaning: to send back, to send up (to a higher authority)
  • Semantic range: general “send back”; in some legal papyri, sending a case/person back to proper jurisdiction
  • English variants: “I have sent back” (most versions); “I am sending” (present-tense reading in some manuscripts)
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul’s action of returning Onesimus to Philemon — a concrete act of reconciliation-facilitation, modeling Intercession and Appeal.
  • French rendering & risk: “je te le renvoie” / “je te le renvoie donc.” Risk: Low.

• σπλάγχνα (splanchna)

  • Transliteration: splanchna
  • Literal meaning: the inward parts/bowels/viscera; figuratively, the seat of deep emotion, “one’s very heart/inmost affections”
  • Semantic range: physical inner organs; metaphorical seat of compassion, love, or grief (cf. Phil 1:8; Phil 2:1; Col 3:12; also 1:7 and 1:20 in this same letter)
  • English variants: “bowels” (KJV, now archaic/misleading), “very heart” (ESV/NIV), “own dear self”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul identifies Onesimus AS his own inmost affections in the flesh — an extraordinarily intimate, almost bodily, expression of pastoral love, repeated in vv.7 and 20 to bracket the letter’s central appeal.
  • French rendering & risk: “mon propre cœur” / “mes entrailles” (archaic). Risk: Medium-High. Literal “entrailles” is used in older French translations (Segond 1910: “mes propres entrailles”) but sounds anatomically crude/archaic to a modern reader; “mon propre cœur” is now standard (TOB, NBS, Bible de Jérusalem) and should be adopted as the curriculum standard, ensured to be used consistently at 1:7, 1:12, and 1:20 (the three occurrences), since it is a deliberate authorial refrain, not three unrelated word choices. Flag for native speaker review to confirm the refrain is preserved identically across all three verses.

---

Philemon 1:13

Greek: ὃν ἐγὼ ἐβουλόμην πρὸς ἐμαυτὸν κατέχειν, ἵνα ὑπὲρ σοῦ μοι διακονῇ ἐν τοῖς δεσμοῖς τοῦ εὐαγγελίου

• κατέχειν (katechein, from κατέχω)

  • Transliteration: katechō
  • Literal meaning: to hold fast, keep back, retain
  • Semantic range: physical retention; legal/custodial holding
  • English variants: “keep,” “keep with me”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul’s stated desire (which he restrains, cf. v.14) to retain Onesimus for his own service — demonstrating self-limitation for the sake of Philemon’s free consent.
  • French rendering & risk: “garder auprès de moi.” Risk: Low.

• διακονῇ (diakonē, from διακονέω) — (baseline-adjacent: not itself in Romans TM, but conceptually parallel to ministry/service vocabulary)

  • Transliteration: diakoneō
  • Literal meaning: to serve, minister, wait upon
  • Semantic range: table service; general practical service; ministry service
  • English variants: “minister to,” “serve,” “help”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Onesimus’s potential service to Paul is framed as gospel ministry, not menial slave-labor — dignifying his role.
  • French rendering & risk: “me servir” / “me venir en aide.” Risk: Low-Medium. Prefer a rendering that does not read as “servile domestic service” only, to preserve the ministry dignity; “me venir en aide au service de l’Évangile” is a stronger option.

• εὐαγγελίου (euangeliou) — (baseline reuse: “Évangile,” Low risk per Romans TM)

  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul’s imprisonment is “for the gospel” — Onesimus’s potential service would itself be gospel-service, dignifying even bond-labor when done “in the Lord” (cf. v.16).
  • French rendering: “Évangile” (baseline term, reused exactly).

---

Philemon 1:14

Greek: χωρὶς δὲ τῆς σῆς γνώμης οὐδὲν ἠθέλησα ποιῆσαι, ἵνα μὴ ὡς κατὰ ἀνάγκην τὸ ἀγαθόν σου ᾖ ἀλλὰ κατὰ ἑκούσιον

• γνώμη (gnōmē)

  • Transliteration: gnōmē
  • Literal meaning: opinion, judgment, consent, will
  • Semantic range: personal judgment/decision; formal consent
  • English variants: “consent” (KJV/ESV), “permission” (NIV)
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul insists on Philemon’s free, uncoerced agreement — theologically central to Grace-Motivated Obedience: genuine Christian response cannot be manufactured by apostolic pressure.
  • French rendering & risk: “ton consentement” / “ton accord.” Risk: Medium. Should be rendered so as to clearly denote voluntary agreement, not mere notification; “avis” (opinion) is too weak. Recommend “sans ton consentement” as the standard rendering; flag alongside ἀνάγκη/ἑκούσιον below as a doctrinally load-bearing cluster.

• ἀνάγκη (anankē)

  • Transliteration: anankē
  • Literal meaning: necessity, compulsion, constraint
  • Semantic range: external compulsion, whether circumstantial or coerced
  • English variants: “by constraint,” “forced,” “compulsion”
  • Contextual theological meaning: The explicit foil to grace-motivated action — what Paul refuses to impose. Directly parallels the Romans doctrine of grace-versus-works/merit (cf. baseline “grace” entry, High risk) in a personal-ethics register rather than soteriology.
  • French rendering & risk: “par contrainte” / “sous la contrainte.” Risk: High. Theological weight is high even though the lexical choice is not obscure: this word anchors the letter’s central ethical claim (obedience must be voluntary, grace-shaped, not coerced) — mistranslation or under-emphasis here would blunt the doctrine “Grace-Motivated Obedience” for the whole letter. Recommend human/native-speaker review flag wherever this verse is rendered.

• ἑκούσιον (hekousion)

  • Transliteration: hekousios
  • Literal meaning: voluntary, willing, of one’s own accord
  • Semantic range: free choice, as opposed to compulsion
  • English variants: “willingly,” “of your own free will,” “voluntary”
  • Contextual theological meaning: The positive term Paul desires — direct doctrinal counterpart to ἀνάγκη; together they form the letter’s key contrastive pair for Grace-Motivated Obedience.
  • French rendering & risk: “de bon gré” / “de plein gré” / “volontairement.” Risk: High (paired with ἀνάγκη above — treat this contrastive pair as a single high-risk translation unit). Recommend “non par contrainte, mais de bon gré” as the fixed rendering for curriculum consistency.

---

Philemon 1:15

Greek: τάχα γὰρ διὰ τοῦτο ἐχωρίσθη πρὸς ὥραν, ἵνα αἰώνιον αὐτὸν ἀπέχῃς

• ἐχωρίσθη (echōristhē, from χωρίζω)

  • Transliteration: chōrizō
  • Literal meaning: to separate, part, be divided from
  • Semantic range: general separation; here a euphemistic passive (“was separated,” softening “ran away”)
  • English variants: “was separated” (rhetorically gentle), “departed”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul’s diplomatically gentle description of Onesimus’s flight, read providentially (“perhaps for this reason”) — an implicit providence doctrine, resonant with the baseline “providence” entry’s caution against fatalistic readings.
  • French rendering & risk: “a été séparé de toi.” Risk: Medium. The passive voice softens Onesimus’s culpability; French must preserve this same diplomatic passive register rather than actively naming him “s’est enfui” (which would flatten Paul’s careful rhetoric), while v.18 still openly acknowledges wrongdoing. Flag for native-speaker review on register-matching.

• αἰώνιον (aiōnion) — (baseline-adjacent: related to eschatological “eternal” vocabulary, not itself a Romans TM entry)

  • Transliteration: aiōnios
  • Literal meaning: age-long, eternal, permanent
  • Semantic range: temporal permanence; in NT usage frequently eschatological (“eternal life”)
  • English variants: “for ever,” “permanently,” “eternally”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Contrasts the temporary separation (“for an hour,” πρὸς ὥραν) with a now-permanent restored relationship — reframed by the next verse as brotherhood “in the Lord,” implying a relationship that outlasts even earthly life.
  • French rendering & risk: “pour toujours” / “à jamais.” Risk: Low-Medium. Avoid a purely eschatological-technical rendering (“éternel” alone can sound overly doctrinal here); “pour toujours” better captures the permanence-of-relationship sense intended.

• ἀπέχῃς (apechēs, from ἀπέχω)

  • Transliteration: apechō
  • Literal meaning: to have back, to possess fully, to have received in full (a commercial term for a completed transaction/receipt)
  • Semantic range: financial “receipt in full” (cf. Phil 4:18, “I have received full payment”); by extension, full possession/restoration
  • English variants: “have him back,” “receive him fully”
  • Contextual theological meaning: A commercial-receipt term repurposed relationally — Philemon is to “receive Onesimus back in full,” reinforcing the letter’s persistent debt/accounting imagery (cf. vv.18-19) redirected toward reconciliation rather than punishment.
  • French rendering & risk: “le retrouver pour toujours” / “le posséder à jamais [comme frère].” Risk: Medium. The commercial “receipt in full” nuance is easily lost; recommend a translator’s note connecting this term to the accounting language of vv.18-19 for the study curriculum, even if the French rendering itself must be relational rather than commercial for readability.

---

Philemon 1:16

Greek: οὐκέτι ὡς δοῦλον ἀλλ᾽ ὑπὲρ δοῦλον, ἀδελφὸν ἀγαπητόν, μάλιστα ἐμοί, πόσῳ δὲ μᾶλλον σοί, καὶ ἐν σαρκὶ καὶ ἐν κυρίῳ

• δοῦλος (doulos)

  • Transliteration: doulos
  • Literal meaning: slave, bondservant; one who is owned and obligated to serve another
  • Semantic range: chattel slave (the dominant Greco-Roman institutional sense); metaphorically, “slave/servant of Christ” (Paul’s own self-designation in Romans 1:1, “Παῦλος δοῦλος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ”)
  • English variants: “servant” (KJV, softening), “slave,” “bondservant” (ESV)
  • Contextual theological meaning: THIS IS THE DOCTRINAL AND CULTURAL CRUX TERM OF THE ENTIRE LETTER. Paul does not ask Philemon to legally manumit Onesimus (the letter never uses the technical manumission vocabulary) but insists the relationship must now be governed by brotherhood “no longer as a slave but more than a slave.” The doctrine “Slavery and the Gospel’s Transforming Power” depends entirely on preserving both halves of this verse: the real, unminimized social institution (δοῦλος) AND its transformation/transcendence by gospel brotherhood (ἀδελφὸν ἀγαπητόν), without collapsing into either (a) an anachronistic abolitionist proof-text Paul does not actually state, or (b) an endorsement of slavery as a permanent, acceptable Christian institution.
  • French rendering & risk: “esclave.” Risk: CRITICAL. This is a distinctly French cultural-historical collision of the same class the baseline documents for other terms (e.g., “élection,” “saints”), but more severe: France’s own transatlantic slave trade (la traite négrière), the Code Noir (1685), and the long, still politically live national reckoning with slavery as crime contre l’humanité (loi Taubira, 2001) mean “esclave” cannot be a neutral or merely historical-sounding word for a contemporary French reader. Two failure modes must both be guarded against: (1) softening “esclave” to something weaker (e.g., “serviteur,” “domestique”) to avoid discomfort, which erases the real, unromanticized social stakes Paul is addressing and thereby weakens the force of “more than a slave”; (2) leaving the term unglossed such that Philemon reads as calmly accepting slavery as a permanent institution, missing that Paul is relativizing the master-slave category through the gospel without yet dismantling it structurally — a nuance requiring explicit study-note commentary given the length of the historical shadow this text has cast (both for and against abolition arguments across church history). MANDATORY: human theologian review for every occurrence of δοῦλος/“esclave” in this curriculum, paired with explicit teaching-note commentary distinguishing Paul’s rhetorical strategy from a modern abolitionist argument, and firmly repudiating any reading that treats New Testament tolerance of the social institution as present-tense endorsement.

• ἀδελφὸν ἀγαπητόν (adelphon agapēton)

  • Transliteration: adelphos agapētos
  • Literal meaning: “beloved brother”
  • Semantic range: ἀδελφός = brother (biological or fictive/spiritual kinship); ἀγαπητός = beloved, dearly loved
  • English variants: “beloved brother,” “dear brother”
  • Contextual theological meaning: The gospel’s redefinition of Onesimus’s identity — family status transcending property status. Central term for “Christian Brotherhood across Social Status.”
  • French rendering & risk: “frère bien-aimé.” Risk: Medium-High. “Frère” in French Christian usage carries mixed register: warmly familial in Protestant/evangelical usage (“frère en Christ”), but can sound distinctively Protestant/free-church to Catholic ears attuned to more formal address; ensure the phrase is glossed contextually (as spiritual kinship, not biological) for readers with low ecclesial literacy. Recommend consistent pairing with δοῦλος above as a single high-risk contrastive translation unit — the antithesis “ne…plus comme un esclave, mais bien mieux, comme un frère bien-aimé” must be rendered as one deliberate rhetorical unit, not split across sentences that dilute the contrast.

• σάρξ (sarx) / κύριος (kyrios) — “in the flesh and in the Lord”: σάρξ here denotes the earthly/social sphere (Onesimus’s household-servant relation to Philemon), and κύριος (baseline reuse: “Seigneur,” High risk per Romans TM) the spiritual-familial sphere. Risk: Medium for σάρξ (ensure it is read as “in the earthly/social relationship,” not with the negative moral sense σάρξ carries elsewhere in Paul, e.g., Romans 8); French “selon la chair” / “selon la chair et selon le Seigneur”, flagged for a clarifying note distinguishing this neutral social-sphere sense from the negative “flesh vs. Spirit” moral contrast found in Romans, to avoid readers importing the wrong doctrine.

---

Philemon 1:17

Greek: εἰ οὖν με ἔχεις κοινωνόν, προσλαβοῦ αὐτὸν ὡς ἐμέ

• κοινωνόν (koinōnon, from κοινωνός)

  • Transliteration: koinōnos
  • Literal meaning: partner, sharer, associate, one who holds something in common
  • Semantic range: business/financial partnership; shared participation (root shared with κοινωνία, “fellowship,” baseline reuse “communion fraternelle”)
  • English variants: “partner” (ESV/NIV), “fellow” (KJV, “if thou count me therefore a partner”)
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul asks Philemon to extend to Onesimus the same reception he would give Paul himself — a radical equalizing move directly serving Christian Brotherhood across Social Status. Paul stakes his own relational standing on Philemon’s reception of a slave as an equal.
  • French rendering & risk: “associé” / “partenaire.” Risk: Medium. Neither French option carries strong doctrinal baggage, but both risk a purely commercial/business register (an “associé” in a firm) if unqualified; recommend “comme un frère dans la communion” or an explanatory phrase linking it back to κοινωνία-fellowship vocabulary already established, rather than a bare business term. Note: distinct from κοινωνία (baseline “communion fraternelle”) — κοινωνός is the person (partner), κοινωνία is the relationship (fellowship); keep the derivational link visible in translator notes even though French requires two different words.

• προσλαβοῦ (proslabou, from προσλαμβάνω)

  • Transliteration: proslambanō
  • Literal meaning: to take to oneself, welcome, receive
  • Semantic range: hospitable reception; the same verb used in Romans 14:1, 15:7 (“welcome one another”)
  • English variants: “receive,” “welcome,” “accept”
  • Contextual theological meaning: A concrete act of reconciliation — receiving Onesimus exactly as one would receive Paul.
  • French rendering & risk: “accueille-le” / “reçois-le.” Risk: Low. Note the cross-reference to Romans 15:7’s “accueillez-vous les uns les autres” for curriculum consistency; if the Romans package rendered this verb a particular way, match it here.

---

Philemon 1:18

Greek: εἰ δέ τι ἠδίκησέν σε ἢ ὀφείλει, τοῦτο ἐμοὶ ἐλλόγα

• ἠδίκησεν (ēdikēsen, from ἀδικέω)

  • Transliteration: adikeō
  • Literal meaning: to do wrong, to wrong someone, to act unjustly toward
  • Semantic range: legal/moral wrongdoing, injury, injustice
  • English variants: “wronged,” “done wrong”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul does not deny or minimize Onesimus’s wrongdoing (likely theft and/or flight) — the doctrine of Forgiveness and Reconciliation in this letter presupposes real, named wrong, not a pretense that nothing happened.
  • French rendering & risk: “t’a fait du tort” / “t’a offensé.” Risk: Low-Medium. Should retain the sense of an acknowledged, real wrong (not merely a misunderstanding) to preserve the letter’s honest confrontation of sin prior to its offer of grace-covered restoration.

• ὀφείλει (opheilei, from ὀφείλω) — (conceptually related to but distinct from baseline “sin” as debt-metaphor; not itself a Romans TM entry)

  • Transliteration: opheilō
  • Literal meaning: to owe, be indebted
  • Semantic range: financial debt; moral/relational obligation
  • English variants: “owes,” “is in debt”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Introduces the letter’s sustained debt/ledger metaphor (continuing through v.19), theologically resonant with the wider NT metaphor of sin as debt (cf. the Lord’s Prayer, “forgive us our debts”) — though here the literal reference is likely a real, material debt (stolen goods, unpaid obligations from the flight).
  • French rendering & risk: “est en dette” / “te doit quelque chose.” Risk: Medium. Keep literal-financial force; over-spiritualizing too early (before v.19’s clearer wordplay) would blur the concrete, real-world financial dimension Paul is actually engaging.

• ἐλλόγα (ellonga, from ἐλλογάω / ἐλλογέω)

  • Transliteration: ellogeō
  • Literal meaning: to charge to an account, to reckon/credit against someone’s ledger — a technical accounting/commercial term
  • Semantic range: bookkeeping, debt-crediting language
  • English variants: “charge it to me,” “put it on my account,” “credit it to my account”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Directly cognate in root and metaphorical domain with λογίζομαι, the verb behind Romans 4:3’s “it was credited/imputed to him as righteousness” (ἐλογίσθη — baseline TM “imputed_righteousness,” Critical risk). Paul applies substitutionary accounting logic personally: Onesimus’s debt is to be transferred to Paul’s account — a vivid, structurally parallel enactment, at the interpersonal level, of the imputation doctrine Paul teaches theologically in Romans. This cross-book connection should be surfaced explicitly in curriculum teaching notes.
  • French rendering & risk: “mets-le sur mon compte” / “porte-le à mon compte.” Risk: High. Given the direct conceptual link to the baseline Critical-risk term “justice imputée” (justice/righteousness credited/imputed), translators and reviewers must be alerted that this verse is not merely a commercial figure of speech but a lived enactment of imputation theology; recommend a cross-reference note to Romans 4:3-8 / “justice imputée” in the teaching material, and human theologian review of this verse given its doctrinal density.

---

Philemon 1:19

Greek: ἐγὼ Παῦλος ἔγραψα τῇ ἐμῇ χειρί, ἐγὼ ἀποτίσω· ἵνα μὴ λέγω σοι ὅτι καὶ σεαυτὸν μοι προσοφείλεις

• ἀποτίσω (apotisō, from ἀποτίνω)

  • Transliteration: apotinō
  • Literal meaning: to pay back, repay in full, discharge a debt
  • Semantic range: standard commercial/legal repayment term, continuing the accounting metaphor of v.18
  • English variants: “I will repay,” “I will pay it back”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul offers to personally satisfy Onesimus’s debt — a small-scale enactment of substitutionary payment, echoing (without being formally identical to) the atonement pattern of Christ paying a debt not his own.
  • French rendering & risk: “je le rembourserai” / “je paierai moi-même.” Risk: Medium. Recommend the curriculum’s teaching notes draw the (careful, appropriately qualified) parallel to substitutionary atonement without overstating Paul-as-Christ-figure; Paul is an illustration of gospel logic, not himself a savior figure.

• προσοφείλεις (prosopheileis, from προσοφείλω)

  • Transliteration: prosopheilō
  • Literal meaning: to owe besides, to owe in addition, to be further indebted
  • Semantic range: intensified/compounded form of ὀφείλω (v.18) — “you owe me even more” (than Onesimus’s debt)
  • English variants: “you owe me even your own self,” “you owe me your very self”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul reminds Philemon that his own conversion (presumably through Paul’s ministry) constitutes a debt dwarfing whatever Onesimus owes — grounding the appeal in prior grace received, a rhetorical instance of Grace-Motivated Obedience: Philemon should act graciously because he himself stands as a debtor to grace.
  • French rendering & risk: “tu me dois ta propre personne” / “c’est toi-même que tu me dois.” Risk: Medium-High. Must retain the rhetorical force (Philemon’s entire self, spiritually, is “owed” to Paul’s ministry) without implying Paul is owed worship or personal fealty properly due only to God — a fine but important line; flag for native-speaker/theologian review to ensure the French does not overstate Paul’s claim on Philemon.

---

Philemon 1:20

Greek: ναί, ἀδελφέ, ἐγώ σου ὀναίμην ἐν κυρίῳ· ἀνάπαυσόν μου τὰ σπλάγχνα ἐν Χριστῷ

• ὀναίμην (onaimēn, optative of ὀνίνημι)

  • Transliteration: oninēmi (optative onaimēn)
  • Literal meaning: “may I have benefit/joy of you,” “may I be profited by you” — a rare optative-mood wish-form
  • Semantic range: benefit, profit, joyful advantage from another person
  • English variants: “let me have joy of thee” (KJV), “I want some benefit from you” (ESV), “do this for me” (NIV paraphrase)
  • Contextual theological meaning: This verb shares its root directly with the name “Ὀνήσιμος” (Onesimus, “useful/beneficial”) and with εὔχρηστον in v.11 — Paul’s closing wordplay: “may I have Onesimus’s benefit [onaimēn] from you, Onesimus [Onēsimos].” The pun brackets the whole appeal (name in v.10, “useful” in v.11, this verb in v.20) and cannot be reproduced lexically in French.
  • French rendering & risk: “que j’obtienne de toi ce bienfait” / “accorde-moi cette joie.” Risk: Medium-High (wordplay-loss risk, not doctrinal-content risk). MANDATORY translator’s note explaining the Onesimus/onaimēn/euchrēston wordplay cluster, since none of these three occurrences can carry their connection into French without explicit commentary — a curriculum-level teaching requirement, not merely a lexical choice.

• ἀνάπαυσόν (anapauson, from ἀναπαύω)

  • Transliteration: anapauō
  • Literal meaning: to give rest, refresh, revive
  • Semantic range: physical rest; emotional/relational refreshment and relief
  • English variants: “refresh,” “give rest to”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Echoes 1:7 (“the hearts/σπλάγχνα of the saints have been refreshed [ἀναπέπαυται] through you”) — Paul asks Philemon to do for him now what Philemon has habitually done for others, closing the letter’s inclusio on σπλάγχνα/refreshment.
  • French rendering & risk: “donne du repos à mon cœur” / “réconforte mon cœur.” Risk: Medium. Must be rendered so as to echo the same root/phrase used at 1:7’s “ἀναπέπαυται” for curriculum consistency (the inclusio effect is a deliberate authorial structure); recommend a single fixed French verb family (“soulager / apporter du soulagement” or “donner du repos”) used identically at both 1:7 and 1:20.

• σπλάγχνα (splanchna) — see full entry at v.12; reused here to close the inclusio with vv.7 and 12. French: “mon cœur” (fixed rendering, consistent across all three occurrences — see v.12 note). Risk: Medium-High (consistency risk, not lexical risk).

---

Philemon 1:21

Greek: Πεποιθὼς τῇ ὑπακοῇ σου ἔγραψά σοι, εἰδὼς ὅτι καὶ ὑπὲρ ἃ λέγω ποιήσεις

• πεποιθὼς (pepoithōs, perfect participle of πείθω)

  • Transliteration: peithō (perfect participle pepoithōs)
  • Literal meaning: having been persuaded, trusting, being confident
  • Semantic range: settled confidence/trust, often in a person’s character or God’s faithfulness
  • English variants: “confident,” “trusting”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Paul’s confidence rests on Philemon’s established Christian character (cf. 1:5-7), not on apostolic coercion — reinforcing that the anticipated “obedience” flows from a relationship of trust, consistent with Grace-Motivated Obedience.
  • French rendering & risk: “confiant en” / “plein de confiance dans.” Risk: Low.

• ὑπακοή (hypakoē) — (baseline-adjacent term: the Romans TM entry “obéissance de la foi” / “obedience_of_faith” is High risk, but that is a specific compound phrase for Romans 1:5/16:26’s ὑπακοὴ πίστεως; here the noun stands alone, referring to Philemon’s personal compliance with Paul’s appeal, not the doctrinal “obedience that flows from faith” formula)

  • Transliteration: hypakoē
  • Literal meaning: obedience, compliance, submission to what is heard
  • Semantic range: general obedience/compliance; in Paul’s theological vocabulary elsewhere, obedience flowing from faith (cf. Romans 1:5)
  • English variants: “obedience,” “compliance”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Must be carefully distinguished in teaching notes from the baseline’s Romans doctrinal phrase “obéissance de la foi” (High risk, guarding against a Trent-style merit reading). Here ὑπακοή is Philemon’s expected free response to Paul’s personal appeal specifically, not a general soteriological formula — though it exemplifies the same underlying principle (faith-grounded, non-coerced obedience) in miniature.
  • French rendering & risk: “obéissance.” Risk: High. Recommend NOT importing the fuller baseline phrase “obéissance de la foi” here (that would overstate a doctrinal technical term where Paul is using the plain noun); use bare “obéissance” but add a teaching note distinguishing this personal-appeal usage from the Romans technical phrase, so students do not conflate the two or assume this verse teaches merit-based standing before God. Flag for human theologian review given the proximity to a Critical/High-risk baseline term family.

---

Part 2 — Whole-Book Coverage: Remaining Sections of Philemon

(Philemon has only one chapter; the sections below cover every verse outside the core passage to guarantee full-book coverage, as no other chapters exist.)

Philemon 1:1-7 — Salutation and Thanksgiving

• δέσμιος (desmios) — reused from v.9 analysis above (Low risk, “prisonnier”). Notable here: Paul opens the letter as “δέσμιος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ” rather than “ἀπόστολος” — a deliberate rhetorical choice (see v.9 note) establishing the appeal-not-command register from the very first word.

• ἀδελφός (adelphos) — “brother” (Timothy, 1:1; Onesimus, 1:16; direct address to Philemon, 1:7, 1:20). New term for this curriculum (no standalone Romans TM entry). French: “frère.” Risk: Medium — see full doctrinal discussion under “Christian Brotherhood” in the v.16 entry above; the term recurs as a structural refrain across the whole letter and should be rendered identically throughout.

• ἀγαπητός (agapētos) — “beloved” (Philemon himself, 1:1; Onesimus, 1:16). French: “bien-aimé.” Risk: Low-Medium. Stable term, but must be applied evenly to both the free master (1:1) and the slave (1:16) to visibly enact the letter’s social leveling — an intentional structural symmetry worth flagging for translators.

• συνεργός (synergos) — “fellow worker” (Philemon, 1:1; also 1:24 of Paul’s companions). French: “collaborateur” or “compagnon d’œuvre.” Risk: Low. Avoid a purely secular-professional “collaborateur” reading in isolation; qualify as gospel co-labor where context allows.

• ἀδελφή (adelphē) — “sister” (Apphia, 1:2). French: “sœur.” Risk: Low.

• συστρατιώτης (systratiōtēs) — “fellow soldier” (Archippus, 1:2; cf. Phil 2:25). French: “compagnon d’armes.” Risk: Low-Medium. Military metaphor for gospel partnership; ensure it does not read as literal militarism given contemporary sensitivities, though this is a minor, well-precedented biblical metaphor.

• ἐκκλησία (ekklēsia) — (baseline reuse: “Église,” High risk per Romans TM) — “the church in your house” (1:2). Contextual note: this is explicitly a house church, a small domestic gathering, not the institutional sense French readers may default to for “l’Église.” Recommend the qualifying phrase “l’Église qui se réunit dans ta maison” be used in full (not abbreviated to bare “l’Église”) to preserve the baseline’s caution against defaulting to the institutional referent.

• χάρις (charis) and εἰρήνη (eirēnē) — (baseline reuse: “grâce” and “paix,” both from the standard Pauline greeting formula, High and Low risk respectively per Romans TM), 1:3. Rendered exactly as in the Romans package: “grâce et paix.”

• θεὸς πατήρ (theos patēr) and κύριος Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (kyrios Iēsous Christos) — (baseline reuse: “Dieu,” “Père,” “Seigneur,” “Jésus,” “Christ” — all per Romans TM), 1:3.

• εὐχαριστῶ (eucharistō) — (baseline-adjacent: cognate with the Romans TM noun entry “thanksgiving” → “action de grâce,” Low risk) — verb form, “I give thanks,” 1:4. French: “je rends grâce” or “je remercie.” Risk: Low. Note the Eucharistic overlap caveat already recorded in the baseline for the noun form applies equally here.

• μνεία (mneia) — “remembrance/mention” (in prayer), 1:4. French: “mention” / “souvenir.” Risk: Low.

• προσευχή (proseuchē) — “prayer,” 1:4. French: “prière.” Risk: Low.

• ἀγάπη (agapē) and πίστις (pistis) — 1:5. (baseline reuse for πίστις: “foi,” Medium risk per Romans TM.) ἀγάπη analyzed fully at v.9 above.

• ἅγιοι (hagioi) — (baseline reuse: “saints,” High risk per Romans TM — the same caution against the canonized-intercessor reading applies here), 1:5, 1:7. French: “saints” with the same mandatory clarifying gloss (“tous les croyants”) the baseline requires wherever the corporate-believer sense is intended and the audience includes general readers.

• κοινωνία (koinōnia) — (baseline reuse: “communion fraternelle,” Low risk per Romans TM), 1:6, “the fellowship/partnership of your faith.” Contextual note: here κοινωνία refers to the practical outworking of Philemon’s faith in generosity toward others (paired with the same root as κοινωνός in v.17) — recommend cross-referencing with v.17’s κοινωνόν entry in teaching notes to surface the derivational link even though French renders them with different words (“communion fraternelle” vs. “associé/partenaire”).

• ἐνεργής (energēs) — “effective, active, at work,” 1:6. French: “efficace” / “actif.” Risk: Low.

• ἐπίγνωσις (epignōsis) — “full knowledge, deep knowledge,” 1:6. French: “pleine connaissance.” Risk: Low.

• χαρά (chara) — “joy,” 1:7. French: “joie.” Risk: Low.

• παράκλησις (paraklēsis) — “comfort, encouragement, appeal” (noun form of the same root as παρακαλῶ, analyzed at v.9), 1:7. French: “encouragement” / “consolation.” Risk: Low-Medium. Note the derivational link to παρακαλῶ for curriculum consistency, though rendered with a different French word.

• σπλάγχνα (splanchna) — 1:7, “the hearts of the saints have been refreshed [ἀναπέπαυται] through you” — first occurrence of the inclusio analyzed fully at v.12 and v.20 above. French: “le cœur” (fixed rendering; see v.12/v.20 notes on consistency).

Philemon 1:22-25 — Closing Requests and Greetings

• ξενία (xenia) — “guest room, lodging, hospitality,” 1:22. French: “une chambre” / “un logement.” Risk: Low. Note: distinct from the broader NT hospitality vocabulary (φιλοξενία); here it is a concrete, literal request for lodging, not a doctrinal term, though it reflects the same relational warmth running through the letter.

• ἐλπίζω (elpizō) — “I hope,” 1:22. French: “j’espère.” Risk: Low. (No standalone “hope” entry in the Romans TM to conflict with; render plainly.)

• χαρισθήσομαι (charisthēsomai, from χαρίζομαι)

  • Transliteration: charizomai
  • Literal meaning: to be given as a favor/grace, to be granted freely — the passive here means “I shall be granted to you [as a gift],” i.e., “I shall be restored/given back to you [through your prayers]”
  • Semantic range: shares its root directly with χάρις (grace) — a wordplay: Paul’s own release from prison would itself be an act of “grace” granted through the Philippians’/Colossians’ prayers.
  • English variants: “I shall be given to you,” “I will be restored to you”
  • Contextual theological meaning: A subtle but genuine grace-wordplay: Paul’s hoped-for release is itself framed in the vocabulary of grace/gift, tying the letter’s closing back to its opening “χάρις ὑμῖν” (1:3) and reinforcing that even apostolic freedom is a matter of grace, not entitlement.
  • French rendering & risk: “je vous serai rendu [par la grâce de Dieu]” or “je vous serai accordé.” Risk: Medium. The χάρις-wordplay is subtle and easily lost entirely in French; recommend a brief translator’s note surfacing the connection to “grâce” for teaching purposes, though a forced literal rendering is not necessary for basic comprehension.

• συναιχμάλωτος (synaichmalōtos)

  • Transliteration: synaichmalōtos
  • Literal meaning: fellow captive, fellow prisoner-of-war (a stronger, more specifically military-captivity term than δέσμιος)
  • Semantic range: joint military captivity; used figuratively by Paul of gospel-companions who share his imprisonment (cf. Col 4:10; Rom 16:7)
  • English variants: “fellow prisoner,” “fellow captive”
  • Contextual theological meaning: Describes Epaphras (1:23); reinforces the letter’s persistent bound-in-Christ motif alongside δέσμιος (1:1, 9, 10, 13) and further personalizes the appeal by surrounding it with a community of those who share Paul’s suffering.
  • French rendering & risk: “mon compagnon de captivité.” Risk: Low. Distinguish from bare “prisonnier” (δέσμιος) in teaching notes if precision is desired, though French may reasonably collapse the distinction in running prose.

• συνεργός (synergos) — 1:24, reused from 1:1 above (“fellow worker,” of Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, Luke). French: “collaborateurs.” Risk: Low.

• χάρις (charis) and πνεῦμα (pneuma) — 1:25, closing benediction “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit.” (baseline reuse for χάρις: “grâce.”) Note on πνεῦμα here: this is “your [human/collective] spirit,” grammatically singular but addressed to the whole house-church community (cf. Gal 6:18; Phil 4:23; 2 Tim 4:22 for the identical Pauline closing formula) — NOT a reference to the Holy Spirit (baseline “Esprit Saint,” Critical risk, is a distinct referent). French rendering & risk: “votre esprit” (lowercase, unambiguous in French since capitalization already distinguishes “l’Esprit Saint” from “votre esprit”). Risk: Low, provided the lowercase convention is followed consistently to avoid any accidental capitalization that would misidentify the referent as the Holy Spirit.

---

Summary Statement of Full-Book Coverage

Every verse of Philemon (1:1-25) has been reviewed above: vv.1-7 (salutation/thanksgiving), vv.8-21 (core passage, full verse-by-verse treatment), and vv.22-25 (closing requests/greetings). No verse contributes zero load-bearing vocabulary; even the closing greetings (1:22-25) carry theologically significant terms (χαρισθήσομαι’s grace-wordplay; συναιχμάλωτος’s captivity-solidarity motif; the precise human-spirit referent of πνεῦμα in the benediction). All terms with established Romans-baseline renderings have been reused exactly; all newly identified Philemon-specific terms are carried forward into 08_core_glossary.md with proposed translation-memory entries and risk tiers.