Cross-Reference Analysis
09 Cross-Reference Analysis — Jude (English → Vietnamese)
0. Scope and Method
Jude is a single-chapter, twenty-five-verse letter. Per the full-book coverage mandate, this analysis accounts for every verse of the one chapter that constitutes the entire book (Jude 1:1–25), not only the core passage (Jude 1:3–23). Citations are normalized to Book Chapter:Verse / Book Chapter:Verse-Verse English-canonical form throughout (e.g., Genesis 4:1-16, Numbers 16:1-35, Romans 16:25-27) so that Phase 2 tooling can machine-match references across curricula regardless of destination-language book-name conventions. Vietnamese Bible citation form (Rô-ma 3:23, Sáng Thế Ký 4:1-16, etc., per the baseline’s Cross-Reference Preservation Rules) is applied only at the rendering stage, never in this analysis layer.
Four cross-reference categories are tracked below:
- OT Quotations and Allusions (Section 1) — every identifiable Old Testament source text standing behind a Jude passage.
- Messianic References (Section 2) — passages asserting or assuming Christ’s unique identity and office.
- Typological Patterns (Section 3) — persons/events functioning as types/warnings.
- Parallels to Other Curricula in This Language, Especially Romans (Section 4) — shared vocabulary, shared doctrinal claims, and (where relevant) the extra-curricular NT parallel in 2 Peter, flagged for future consistency even though 2 Peter is not yet part of this pipeline’s curricula.
Section 5 then derives rendering-consistency rules binding Phase 2 translation of any shared quotation or near-verbatim doctrinal formula across Jude and Romans.
Section 1 — OT Quotations and Allusions Matrix (Full Verse Coverage)
| Jude Passage | Theme | Related Character(s) | OT Connection (normalized) | NT Connection (normalized) | Translation Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jude 1:5 | OT Warning as Type — Israel | The Exodus generation; “the Lord” (κύριος) | Exodus 12:1-14:31 (deliverance from Egypt); Numbers 14:1-38 (unbelieving generation destroyed in the wilderness); Deuteronomy 1:32-35 | 1 Corinthians 10:1-11 (Paul’s parallel use of the wilderness generation as a warning “type,” τύπος) | High. Must render “saved” (σώσας) as a historical, national deliverance distinct from σωτηρία’s soteriological sense in v.3, so readers do not conclude covenant membership or a past rescue guarantees final salvation. “Destroyed” (ἀπώλεσεν) must remain personal, judicial destruction by God — never impersonal karmic consequence. |
| Jude 1:6 | OT Warning as Type — Angels | Fallen angels | Genesis 6:1-4 (background tradition of angelic transgression, as developed in Second Temple Jewish literature, esp. 1 Enoch 6-16) | 2 Peter 2:4 (near-verbatim parallel: angels who sinned, cast into chains of darkness) | High. “Kept” (τηρέω) here is judicial-custodial, the negative pole of the letter’s keeping-motif (see Section 3 and the Doctrine Note in 07_semantic_analysis.md). Must not be confused with the Vietnamese folk category of “thần linh” (local/ancestor spirits). |
| Jude 1:7 | OT Warning as Type — Sodom | The men of Sodom and Gomorrah | Genesis 19:1-29 (destruction of Sodom, Gomorrah, and the surrounding cities for sexual sin) | 2 Peter 2:6-7 (parallel use of Sodom and Gomorrah as an example, δεῖγμα); cf. Matthew 11:23-24, Luke 17:29 | High. “Eternal fire” (πυρὸς αἰωνίου) must be rendered as final, unending judgment illustrated by a historical, completed act of destruction — not a temporary purifying fire preceding restoration or rebirth. |
| Jude 1:9 | Typology — Restraint in Judgment | Archangel Michael; the devil; (body of) Moses | Deuteronomy 34:5-6 (Moses’ unmarked burial, background to the dispute); the specific dispute over Moses’ body is drawn from a non-canonical tradition (the Assumption of Moses, not extant in full); the rebuke formula “The Lord rebuke you” directly echoes Zechariah 3:2 (the Angel of the LORD’s rebuke of Satan over Joshua the high priest) | — | High. This is a direct verbal quotation of an OT formula (Zechariah 3:2) transposed to a new setting; the Vietnamese rendering of “The Lord rebuke you” must match established Vietnamese Bible phrasing for Zechariah 3:2 if/when that book is translated, to preserve cross-canon recognizability. The non-canonical source of the Michael/devil dispute itself requires the same teaching caution given for v.14 (see below): Jude affirms the truth of this specific tradition without canonizing its source document. |
| Jude 1:11a | OT Warning as Type — Cain | Cain | Genesis 4:1-16 (Cain’s murder of Abel, false worship, and judgment) | 1 John 3:12 (Cain as a negative moral type); Hebrews 11:4 (contrast with Abel’s faith) | Medium. “The way of Cain” functions as shorthand for murderous jealousy and self-willed, unaccepted worship; requires OT narrative literacy the target audience may lack (per system-prompt reading-level note). |
| Jude 1:11b | OT Warning as Type — Balaam | Balaam | Numbers 22:1-24:25 (Balaam’s oracles); Numbers 31:16 (Balaam’s role in Israel’s sin at Peor, retrospectively read as corrupting Israel for profit) | 2 Peter 2:15-16 (parallel use of Balaam); Revelation 2:14 (Balaam as a type of doctrinal corruption for gain) | Medium. “Balaam’s error” (πλάνη) must retain the sense of a paid religious professional corrupting God’s people for gain — directly parallel to the false teachers’ financial exploitation in Jude 1:16. |
| Jude 1:11c | OT Warning as Type — Korah | Korah | Numbers 16:1-35 (Korah’s rebellion against Moses’ and Aaron’s divinely appointed authority, and his judgment) | — | High. “Korah’s rebellion” (ἀντιλογία) must be linked to the letter’s earlier charge of rejecting κυριότης/“dominion” (Jude 1:8); this is rebellion against divinely instituted authority, not merely a personality conflict. |
| Jude 1:12-13 | Judgment on Ungodly False Teachers — Nature Imagery | The false teachers (unnamed) | Composite allusion, not direct quotation: Proverbs 25:14 (clouds without rain, cf. “waterless clouds”); Isaiah 57:20 (the wicked like the tossing sea, cf. “wild waves of the sea”); Ezekiel 34:1-10 (shepherds who feed themselves rather than the flock, cf. “shepherding themselves”) | — | Medium. These are allusive image-clusters, not verbal quotations; the Vietnamese rendering should preserve the vivid, concrete nature-imagery rather than smoothing it into abstract description, since the imagery itself carries the theological indictment. |
| Jude 1:14-15 | Judgment on Ungodly False Teachers — Prophetic Citation | Enoch; “the Lord” coming in judgment | Direct citation of 1 Enoch 1:9 (a non-canonical Second Temple Jewish text); background canonical resonance in Deuteronomy 33:2 (the LORD coming with “holy myriads”), Daniel 7:9-10 (thousands upon thousands attending the divine judgment throne), Zechariah 14:5 (“the LORD… will come, and all the holy ones with him”) | Matthew 25:31 (the Son of Man coming with his angels in glory to judge); 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10 (parallel judgment-coming imagery) | Critical. Requires explicit doctrinal handling: Jude, under inspiration, affirms the truth of this specific statement, not the canonicity of 1 Enoch as a whole. See Doctrine Note below (Section 2) and the parallel caution already flagged for Jude 1:9. Must not be taught as equivalent in authority to consulting an old almanac or a thầy bói’s (fortune-teller’s) sayings. |
| Jude 1:16 | Judgment on Ungodly False Teachers — Grumbling | The false teachers | Allusive parallel to Israel’s wilderness grumbling: Numbers 14:2, 27-29; Exodus 16:2-8; 1 Corinthians 10:10 (explicit NT naming of this OT pattern as a warning) | 1 Corinthians 10:10 | Low-Medium. Ties the present false teachers back to the same wilderness-generation type introduced in Jude 1:5, reinforcing narrative cohesion across the letter. |
| Jude 1:17-18 | Fulfillment of Apostolic Prediction | ”the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ” | — (NT-internal prediction, not OT) | 2 Peter 3:2-3 (near-verbatim parallel prediction of end-time scoffers); 1 Timothy 4:1; 2 Timothy 3:1-5; Acts 20:29-30 (Paul’s own warning of this pattern) | Medium. This is an intra-apostolic (NT-to-NT) cross-reference rather than an OT citation; establishes that the danger described was already predicted, not a surprising novelty. |
| Jude 1:22-23 | Mercy and Rescue of the Wavering | Those who doubt/waver | Direct verbal echo of Zechariah 3:2 (“Is not this man a brand plucked from the fire?”); cf. Amos 4:11 (“you were… like a firebrand snatched from the burning”) | — | High. “Snatching… out of the fire” (ἐκ πυρὸς ἁρπάζοντες) is a rescue-image drawn from the same OT well as the rebuke-formula in Jude 1:9 — both trace to the Zechariah 3 vision of Satan’s accusation and the LORD’s gracious rescue. The Vietnamese rendering should, where feasible, echo the same root imagery used for Zechariah 3:2 and Amos 4:11 if/when those passages are translated in this pipeline, reinforcing the canonical connection between accusation, rescue, and mercy. |
| Jude 1:24-25 | Doxology and God’s Preserving Power | — | Doxological form echoes OT liturgical ascription patterns (e.g., 1 Chronicles 29:11-13; Psalm 96:6-9) | Close structural and near-verbatim parallel to Romans 16:25-27 (see Section 4 below) | High. See the dedicated rendering-consistency rule in Section 5; this is the single most important cross-curricular consistency point in the entire book. |
Full-chapter coverage note: Jude 1:1-2, 1:3-4, 1:8, 1:10, 1:19-21 contain no additional distinct OT quotation or allusion beyond what is captured above or in the doctrine-note discussions of 07_semantic_analysis.md; they are accounted for as reviewed with no further OT cross-reference to record.
Section 2 — Messianic References
| Jude Passage | Messianic Claim | OT/NT Connection | Translation Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jude 1:1 | Believers are “kept for Jesus Christ” — Christ as the eschatological goal/owner of believers’ security | John 10:28-29 (no one snatches Christ’s sheep from his hand); cf. baseline Romans “Kept by God” resonance in Romans 8:38-39 | Medium. Establishes Christ, not an impersonal fate or accumulated merit, as the one who secures believers. |
| Jude 1:4 | ”our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ” (δεσπότης καὶ κύριος) — single-article apposition asserting Christ’s full deity and exclusive lordship | Direct doctrinal parallel to Romans 10:9 (“Jesus is Lord”) and Romans 14:9 (Christ as Lord of both the dead and the living) | Critical. See baseline’s “Lordship of Christ” and “Deity of Christ” doctrines (Critical risk in doctrine_risk_registry.json). Vietnamese must not separate “Master” from “Lord” as if naming two different persons. |
| Jude 1:5 | ”the Lord” (κύριος) as the one who saved Israel out of Egypt — identifying the OT covenant LORD’s saving/judging activity with the same κύριος title applied to Christ elsewhere in the letter | Consistent with the NT pattern of applying OT YHWH-texts to Christ, cf. Romans 10:13 (citing Joel 2:32) | High. Reinforces a single, continuous divine identity across Testaments rather than two separate “lord” figures. |
| Jude 1:14-15 | Enoch’s prophecy: “Behold, the Lord comes… to execute judgment” — a coming-in-judgment oracle applied by the NT church to Christ’s return | Matthew 25:31-46; Acts 1:11; 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10; cf. Romans’s own future-judgment language in Romans 2:5-6, 14:10-12 | High. The “Lord” who comes in judgment must be recognizably the same Lord Jesus Christ named throughout the letter (vv.4,17,21), not a generic apocalyptic figure. |
| Jude 1:21 | ”the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life” | Direct doctrinal parallel to Romans 6:23 (“the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”) | High. See Section 5 rendering-consistency rule; “eternal life… in/through Christ” should use the same core phrase as the Romans package. |
| Jude 1:25 | ”the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord” — Trinitarian-shaped doxology naming God as Savior and Christ as the mediating agent | Structural parallel to Romans 16:25-27; conceptual parallel to 1 Timothy 1:1, Titus 2:13 (both title God/Christ “Savior”) | Critical. σωτῆρι (“Savior”) ties directly back to σωτηρία (“salvation,” Jude 1:3) and to the whole Romans “Salvation” doctrine (Critical risk); must read as one coherent gospel of rescue by a personal Savior, mediated through Christ. |
Doctrine Note — Messianic Promise / Fulfillment of Prophecy (Enoch citation, Jude 1:14-15): As already flagged in 07_semantic_analysis.md, Jude’s citation of 1 Enoch 1:9 requires a teaching note wherever this passage is translated or taught: Jude, writing under inspiration, affirms this specific prophetic statement as true; he does not thereby certify the whole of 1 Enoch as canonical Scripture, any more than Paul’s citation of pagan poets in Acts 17:28 or Titus 1:12 canonizes those authors’ complete works. In the Vietnamese context this distinction must be drawn clearly against the popular acceptance of old almanacs or the sayings of a thầy bói as equally authoritative religious sources — this is inspired citation, not source-document canonization.
Section 3 — Typological Patterns
| Type / Pattern | OT Basis | Jude’s Use | Cross-Curricular Parallel (Romans) | Translation Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threefold OT judgment sequence: Israel, Angels, Sodom | Numbers 14, Genesis 6, Genesis 19 | Jude 1:5-7 arranges three escalating “even though privileged/powerful, still judged” examples as the structural backbone of his warning | Parallels Romans’s own use of OT judgment narrative to establish “Universal Human Accountability” (Romans 1:18-3:20; cf. Romans 2:6-11) — both letters ground present warning in settled, past, historical divine judgments rather than abstract threat | High. The three types must be kept structurally parallel in Vietnamese (same discourse markers: “just as… in like manner…”) so the escalating logic (chosen people → chosen angels → chosen-for-destruction cities) remains visible. |
| Threefold character type: Cain, Balaam, Korah | Genesis 4, Numbers 22-24 & 31, Numbers 16 | Jude 1:11 names three named figures as moral-vocational types (false worship/jealousy; profit-driven false prophecy; usurped authority) matching the false teachers’ specific sins already described in vv.4,8,16 | No direct Romans parallel; this typological technique (named OT figure as a durable moral category) is distinct to Jude’s polemical style | Medium. Preserve the proper names in their established Vietnamese Bible forms (Table 8 of 08_core_glossary.md) rather than replacing them with descriptive paraphrase, since recognizability of the type depends on the name. |
| Michael’s restraint vs. the false teachers’ recklessness | Background tradition behind Deuteronomy 34:5-6; direct echo of Zechariah 3:2 | Jude 1:9-10 contrasts a chief angel’s refusal to pronounce his own judgment on the devil with the false teachers’ presumptuous slander of “the glorious ones” | Thematic parallel to Romans’s teaching on not usurping God’s prerogative to judge (Romans 12:19, quoting Deuteronomy 32:35) | Medium. The contrast (restraint vs. recklessness) must remain visible; do not let “rebuke” language flatten into a generic moral lesson divorced from the specific angelic-dispute setting. |
| τηρέω (“keep”) as a single verb tracking failure and security | Conceptually rooted in OT covenant-keeping language (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:9, God “keeping” covenant) | Jude 1:1,6,13,21,24 — the letter’s structural spine (see Doctrine Note in 07_semantic_analysis.md) | Direct doctrinal parallel to Romans’s “Assurance of Salvation” (Romans 8:28-39, esp. 8:38-39) — both letters hold human responsibility and divine preservation together without contradiction | High. Vietnamese must use one consistent root (giữ) across all five occurrences, with translator notes distinguishing subject/object at each, per the dedicated Doctrine Note already established. |
| ”Snatched from the fire” as rescue-typology | Zechariah 3:2; Amos 4:11 | Jude 1:23 applies the OT rescue-from-judgment image to the church’s present duty toward wavering members | No direct Romans parallel; conceptually resonant with Romans’s grace-rescue logic (Romans 5:6-10) | High. See Section 5 rule; keep “kéo… ra khỏi lửa” consistent with any future translation of Zechariah 3:2/Amos 4:11 in this pipeline. |
Section 4 — Parallels to Other Curricula in This Language (Especially Romans)
Jude and Romans share a substantial theological vocabulary already fixed in the baseline translation_memory.json. This section records where Jude’s use of a shared term or formula must remain identical to its established Romans rendering, and where Jude introduces a related but distinct sense requiring a clarifying note rather than a different Vietnamese word.
| Shared Element | Romans Locus | Jude Locus | Relationship | Rendering Rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| σωτηρία / “salvation” | Romans 1:16, 10:1,10, 13:11 | Jude 1:3 (“our common salvation”), 1:25 (“our Savior”) | Same sense: personal deliverance by God through Christ, never Buddhist liberation from rebirth | Use sự cứu rỗi exactly as fixed in baseline; Jude 1:25’s Cứu Chúa (“Savior”) must be recognizably built on the same root. |
| χάρις / “grace” | Romans 3:24, 5:2,15-17,20-21, 6:1,14-15, 11:5-6 | Jude 1:4 (grace perverted into license) | Jude presents the negative case: the same grace Romans defends against legalism is here defended against antinomian abuse | Use ân điển exactly; the Vietnamese must make clear this is the identical gift being twisted, not a different, lesser “grace.” Both letters converge on: grace never becomes a license to sin (cf. Romans 6:1-2 and Jude 1:4 as mirror-image warnings). |
| κύριος / “Lord,” confession of Christ’s Lordship | Romans 10:9 (“Jesus is Lord” = salvation confession) | Jude 1:4 (“our only Master and Lord… Jesus Christ”) | Same exclusive, supreme Lordship claim | Chúa exactly, per baseline. The Vietnamese rendering of Jude 1:4 must not read as a weaker or merely honorific lordship than the Romans 10:9 confession. |
| κλητός / “called” | Romans 1:6-7, 8:28-30 | Jude 1:1 (“to those who are called”) | Same effectual-calling sense | được kêu gọi exactly. |
| ζωὴ αἰώνιος / “eternal life” | Romans 6:23 (“the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”) | Jude 1:21 (“the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life”) | Near-identical formula: eternal life as the outcome of Christ’s mercy/gift, mediated through him as Lord | sự sống đời đời, exactly as would be used for Romans 6:23; both passages must avoid any hint of a repeatable/cyclical afterlife. |
| ἀσπάζομαι-pattern doxology (“to him be glory… forever, Amen”) | Romans 16:25-27 (closing doxology: “to the only wise God be glory forevermore through Jesus Christ. Amen”) | Jude 1:24-25 (closing doxology: “to the only God our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory… forever. Amen”) | Direct structural and near-verbatim parallel — both are climactic closing doxologies naming God as the sole, wise/only God, mediating glory through Jesus Christ, extending into unending future ages, sealed with Amen | See Section 5 Rule 1 below — the single most important cross-curricular rendering-consistency requirement in this analysis. |
| πίστις / “faith” | Romans 1:17, 3:22-28, 4:1-25, 10:9-10,17 (personal trust sense) | Jude 1:3, 1:20 (deposit-of-doctrine sense: “the faith… delivered,” “your most holy faith”) | Related but distinct sense of the same Greek word | Reuse đức tin (per baseline reuse rule), but Jude occurrences require an added translator note (already specified in 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md) distinguishing the “body of apostolic doctrine” sense from personal trust, and guarding against collapse into generic đạo (“a religion/way”). This is a genuine extension of baseline usage, not a contradiction of it. |
| ἐπιθυμία / “desires/lusts” | Not a keyword in the Romans baseline package, but conceptually present in Romans 1:24, 6:12, 7:7-8 (bodily/sinful desire) | Jude 1:16, 1:18 (“their own sinful desires,” “their own ungodly passions”) | Consistent NT moral-theological category: appetite in rebellion against a personal God | tư dục, as newly fixed in 08_core_glossary.md; must be kept distinct from the Buddhist metaphysical category of “dục” as the root of suffering within samsara, a distinction Romans did not need to make as explicitly but which Jude’s polemical context brings to the fore. |
| δεσπότης καὶ κύριος apposition (Jude 1:4) vs. Romans’s Father/Son distinctions | Romans 1:7 (“God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” — Father and Son distinguished by separate titles) | Jude 1:4 (both “Master” and “Lord” applied to the same referent, Jesus Christ) | Important grammatical contrast, not a contradiction: Romans regularly distinguishes Father (“God”) from Son (“Lord Jesus Christ”) using separate titles for separate Persons; Jude 1:4 uniquely stacks two sovereignty-titles onto Christ alone | Translator note required: do not let Vietnamese readers assume Jude 1:4’s “Đấng Chủ Tể” refers to the Father as it might by analogy with Romans 1:7’s pattern; the single Greek article makes both titles co-referential to Christ. |
| Second Temple/extra-canonical citation practice | No Romans parallel (Paul does not cite non-canonical apocalyptic literature in the Romans corpus) | Jude 1:9, 1:14-15 | Jude-specific feature with no baseline precedent | New doctrine-note requirement (Section 2 above); flag for theologian review whenever this curriculum is taught alongside Romans so students do not wrongly infer that Romans’ silence on such sources implies they carry no truth-value, or conversely that Jude’s citation implies canonical status for the source document. |
| Extra-curricular NT parallel: 2 Peter | Not part of the current curriculum set | Jude 1:4-13, 1:16-18 are paralleled almost verse-for-verse in 2 Peter 2:1-18 and 2 Peter 3:1-3 | Literary-historical relationship (either direct literary dependence or shared source), not a doctrinal cross-reference within the current curriculum set | Flagged for future consistency only: if 2 Peter is ever added as a curriculum in this language pipeline, the overlapping Vietnamese renderings (ἀσεβεῖς, ἀσέλγεια, πλάνη Βαλαάμ, ἐμπαῖκται, etc.) established here for Jude should be reused rather than re-derived independently, to preserve cross-book consistency for the same underlying Greek vocabulary. |
Section 5 — Rendering-Consistency Rules for Shared Quotations
The following rules are binding on Phase 2 translation whenever Jude and Romans (or any future curriculum sharing these texts) are processed together, and must be added to the AI translation requirements instruction set (Step 4 deliverable):
-
Jude 1:24-25 / Romans 16:25-27 (closing doxologies). Both passages ascribe glory to the “only” God/wise God, mediated “through Jesus Christ,” extending into unending future ages, sealed with “Amen.” The Vietnamese renderings must use matching vocabulary for the shared elements:
- “the only [wise] God” → Đức Chúa Trời có một, là Đấng duy nhất (Jude) should structurally echo whatever established rendering exists for Romans 16:27’s “the only wise God” (Đức Chúa Trời khôn sáng có một, per Bản Dịch Truyền Thống convention) — the “only… God” core must match even though Jude adds “our Savior” and Romans adds “wise.”
- “through Jesus Christ [our Lord]” → qua Đức Chúa Giê-xu Christ, Chúa chúng ta in both books, exactly.
- “be glory… forever/forevermore. Amen.” → δόξα renders sự vinh hiển (reuse) in both; the eternity-phrase must render as a single unbroken timeline (đời đời / cho đến đời đời không cùng), never with cyclical-time vocabulary, in both books.
-
Jude 1:21 / Romans 6:23 (“eternal life” through/from the Lord Jesus Christ). Render sự sống đời đời identically in both loci; do not vary to “cuộc sống vĩnh cửu” or other synonyms in either book, to preserve the learner’s ability to recognize the recurring formula across curricula.
-
Jude 1:4 / Romans 10:9 (Lordship confession). Both passages carry the letter’s/curriculum’s highest-stakes Christological claim. “Chúa” must be used in both with no qualifying or softening modifier (e.g., never “một chúa” implying “a lord among others”). Jude 1:4’s compound title requires the additional Đấng Chủ Tể for δεσπότης, but Chúa for κύριος must remain textually identical to Romans 10:9’s Chúa.
-
Jude 1:4 (grace perverted) / Romans 6:1, 3:24, 11:5-6 (grace defended). Both must use ân điển with no variation, and the surrounding Vietnamese phrasing in both must preserve the explicit contrast between free, undeserved gift and either (a) legalistic merit-earning (Romans’s typical polemical target) or (b) antinomian license (Jude’s polemical target) — never allow either passage’s grace-defense to be flattened into “good fortune” or “blessing” vocabulary.
-
Jude 1:3, 1:20 (πίστις, deposit sense) / Romans (πίστις, personal-trust sense, throughout). Both use đức tin, but Phase 2 segment cache entries for Jude 1:3 and 1:20 must carry an explicit
sense: "deposit_of_doctrine"tag distinct from the defaultsense: "personal_trust"tag used for Romans occurrences, so that back-translation review and footnoting can apply the correct teaching note (see07_semantic_analysis.mdDoctrine Note, Jude 1:3) without altering the shared Vietnamese term itself. -
Citation format. All Scripture cross-references appearing in Phase 2 output (footnotes, teaching notes, cross-reference call-outs) must render in Vietnamese Bible citation form per the baseline’s Cross-Reference Preservation Rules (e.g.,
Jude 1:3→ “Giu-đe 1:3”;Romans 16:25-27→ “Rô-ma 16:25-27”;Zechariah 3:2→ “Xa-cha-ri 3:2”;Genesis 19:1-29→ “Sáng Thế Ký 19:1-29”), while this analysis document and all Phase 1 segment-cache metadata retain the English-canonical normalized form given above for machine cross-matching. -
New book-name additions required for translation memory. Jude’s OT/NT cross-references introduce book names not present in the Romans-only baseline transliteration list (
12_ai_translation_requirements.md). The following established Vietnamese Bible book names must be added to that list before Phase 2 processing of any Jude cross-reference footnote: Xuất Ê-díp-tô Ký (Exodus), Sáng Thế Ký (Genesis, already implicitly needed), Dân Số Ký (Numbers), Phục Truyền Luật Lệ Ký (Deuteronomy), Xa-cha-ri (Zechariah), A-mốt (Amos), Đa-ni-ên (Daniel), 1 Sử Ký (1 Chronicles), Thi Thiên (Psalms, already listed), 2 Phi-e-rơ (2 Peter, for the extra-curricular parallel note only), 1 Giăng (1 John), Hê-bơ-rơ (Hebrews), Khải Huyền (Revelation).
This document depends on and extends 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md. It must be loaded alongside those files and the Romans baseline package before Phase 2 processing of any Jude segment containing a Scripture cross-reference or a shared quotation with Romans.